Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. My name is Desiree, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the SandRidge fourth-quarter 2023 conference call. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to turn the conference over to Scott Prestridge, SVP, Finance and Strategy. Please go ahead.

Thank you, and welcome, everyone. With me today are Grayson Pranin, our CEO; Brandon Brown, our CFO; as well as Dean Parrish, our SVP of Operations. We would like to remind you that today's call contains forward-looking statements and assumptions which are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements. We may also refer to adjusted EBITDA and adjusted G&A and other non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of these measures can be found on our website. With that, I'll turn the call over to Grayson.

Thank you and good morning. I'm pleased to report on another consistent quarter of results and year. The company's activity continues to translate to meaningful free cash flow from our producing assets. Before expanding on this, Brandon will touch on a few highlights.

Thank you, Grayson. Production averaged approximately 17 MBoe per day for the year with oil production up approximately 10% compared to the prior year, driven by the higher oil content from our Northwest Stack wells. The company generated adjusted EBITDA of nearly $20 million for the quarter and approximately $93 million for the year. As we have pointed out in the past, our adjusted EBITDA is a unique metric for SandRidge due to us having no I and very T given that we have no debt and a substantial NOL position that shields our cash flows from federal income taxes. On the I portion, we in fact generated approximately $2.8 million of interest income during the quarter and $10.6 million for the year for cash out and diversity of high-yield deposit accounts. The company initiated a return of capital program last year with a total cumulative dividends paid to date of approximately $137 million or $3.70 per share, including the one-time dividend of $1.50 per share paid on February 20 of this year. In addition, our Board recently approved an $0.11 per share dividend which is a 10% increase over the previous quarter's regular-way dividend. This will be paid on March 29, 2024 to shareholders of record on March 15, 2024. Net cash including restricted cash at year end 2023 was $254 million and adjusted for the $1.50 per share dividend paid on February 20, 2024, approximately $200 million which represents over $5.30 per share of our common stock issued and outstanding. The company has no term debt or revolving debt obligations as of December 31, 2023 and continues to live within cash flow, funding all its capital expenditures and cash flow from operations and cash held on the balance sheet. Commodity price realizations for the year before considering the impact of hedges were $74.69 per barrel of oil, $1.71 per Mcf of gas, and $20.83 per barrel NGLs. As alluded to earlier, we have maintained our large federal NOL position which is estimated to be $1.6 billion at quarter end. Our NOL position has and will continue to allow us to shield our cash flows from federal income taxes. Our commitment to cost discipline has continued to be impactful with adjusted G&A for the quarter of $2.2 million and $8.8 million or $1.42 per BOE for the year. We continue to generate net income for our shareholders. During the year, we earned adjusted net income of approximately $69 million or $1.87 per basic share and net cash provided by operating activities of approximately $116 million. This has all culminated in the company producing approximately $89 million in free cash flow for the year, which represents a conversion rate of approximately 96% relative to adjusted EBITDA or approximately $2.40 per share of common stock outstanding. Before shifting to our outlook, we should note that our earnings release and 10-K provide further detail on our financial and operational performance during the year.

Thank you, Brandon. We thought it would be helpful to walk through some of the company's highlights, business strategy, and other business details. As I mentioned previously, we had positive results this past year with the Northwest Stack wells adding oilier production while converting over 96% of EBITDA to free cash flow. Production for the year from our Mid-Con assets averaged approximately 17 MBoe per day, roughly 4% over the midpoint of 2023 guidance with oil volumes increasing 10% from the prior year, aided by the oilier content from our Northwest Stack area. The company's largest natural gas purchaser remained in ethane rejection, and we anticipate that a majority of our natural gas stream could remain in ethane rejection this year. While this impacts the total volume of NGLs, the remaining volume will be composed of more profitable C3-plus components like propane, butane, and gasoline on a percentage basis. Likewise, the ethane remaining in the natural gas stream will improve its BTU quality. Let us pause for a moment to revisit the key highlights of SandRidge. Our asset base is focused in the Mid-Continent region with a primarily PDP well set, which do not require any routine flaring of produced gas. These well unlisted assets are most fully held by production with a long history, shallowing and diversified production profile and double-digit reserve life. These assets include more than 1,000 miles each of owned and operated SWD and electric infrastructure over our footprint. This substantial owned and integrated infrastructure provides the company both cost and strategic advantages, bolstering asset operating margin, reduce lifting as well as water handling and disposal costs, and combined with other advantages help derisk individual well profitability for majority of our producing well down to $40 WTI and $2 Henry Hub. While we have recently seen…

[Operator Instructions]. Your first question comes from the line of Josh Young with Bison Interests.

So first of all, you guys results are great considering how little you're reinvesting, so I wanted to commend you on that very low decline rate, and you're also not reinvesting into gas production at low prices. So I wanted to I commend you for that. I wanted to ask on the cash balance. So you guys have done some special dividends which are fun to receive as a shareholder but don't really compound value over time, and you are sitting on a very large cash balance. How do you think about the maximum return approach towards deploying that and what the opportunity cost is of sitting on such a large cash balance considering the free cash flow profile?

Know this is something that we consistently spend a lot of time on and have meaningful conversations with our Board and are constantly evaluating. We're trying to balance our growing cash position with maintaining the optionality of M&A, especially given the reduced natural gas price environment today that we think that we can take advantage of, as well as the other things that I mentioned on the call, as well as returning capital to shareholders. And we're looking at that as a three-pronged approach, right, on making sure that we have a good regular-way dividend that we can consistently approve quarter after quarter and balance that out over time. Second is, to top off the special dividends, again, just balancing the time that we're taking to review M&A versus being capitally disciplined in the current environment, as well as opportunistic share repurchases. So I don't think that we're sticking to any one option and know that as dynamics change this year going forward, we'll re-evaluate. So if something's not working. We'll have additional discussions and try to account for all the facts at the time.

Okay. But I guess two quick follow-ups on that. One, have you guys actually repurchased a single share since you went net cash positive at, I think, it was $5 a share three years ago? There has been discussion of getting approval of it. Have you guys actually bought a single share back?

We have not, but we continue to maintain the program. And since there's opportunistically repurchased during market dislocations compared to our NAV, the program is not intended to buy back certain amounts at certain times or do it under any circumstances. So we're not trying to make a goal of repurchasing all $75 million this year. But for example, if there's a dislocation between our share price and we still have strong support commodity, a high NAV, those are perfect opportunities to buoy our share price and repurchase shares. Fortunately or unfortunately, the share prices have performed relatively well since the announcement of the return of capital program with the recent changes that we made last year and then again this year with less instances of market dislocation.

Okay, great. And then just last follow-up. Aren't you better off buying much smaller assets of this sort? You did buy one last year of this sort at a very high discount rate with a lot of cash flow versus the purchase cost. Aren't you better off focusing on that rather than on sort of this M&A where you'd be advantaged with having a large cash balance, and aren't you better off going on hiring more land, men, and doing many million dollar to $10 million sorts of deals rather than trying to preserve this optionality?

No, it's a great question. The answer is we are looking at those things. We try to take advantage of them when they come. We're constantly doing to drum up new opportunities. However, there's not always perfect timing with buyer and seller, right? And we have to have that -- to get things done on the small ball acquisition front, and we'd like to maintain the optionality for something that's more significant than that. So we're evaluating evaluating a range of opportunities that range from a couple of million up to a couple of hundred million and know that we have a high bar, and anything that we do is going to be accretive to our shareholders. But we are promoting those small ball on acquisitions right, alongside the larger ones.

Your next question comes from the line of David Cardell with BluePond Capital.

Yes. I'm interested in exploring more the M&A environment, and I'm curious if deal prices are better on smaller deals or for larger deals. I'm curious how big a deal you feel you could do. And I'm also curious about -- right now, you would think that the price environment is very good that there being a lot of opportunities. The Mid-Con, in a sense, is kind of an undervalued basin and the pricing, Henry Hub gas prices are so low. So I would think that there would be deals to be had. And I appreciate the fact that you are very careful. I totally am on board with that. But I'm just trying to get a realistic understanding about what we can expect over the course of the year. How you're seeing the deal flow? What there there is out there, if it's looking better? So I realized I've asked a lot of questions on an M&A, but if you can opine on any of those, that would be helpful.

I'll try to hit as many of them as I can. If I miss anything, please follow back up. I think we're seeing a constructive M&A market within the Mid-Con. We agree with you that Mid-Con is a place we are able to generate meaningful cash flow just like we have in our incumbent assets. We think we can further leverage that by expanding our asset base and taking our cost focus efforts, both to the expense and the back office side leverage, and we know the area well. So we continue to see things -- like I mentioned to Josh, the challenge is you have to have alignment between the buyer and seller. We're committed as a Board and management team to make this a top priority. With return of capital, M&A is right behind it, making sure that we are actively looking at and evaluating opportunities that make sense and trying to do something that's really accretive to shareholders, trying to take advantage of the currently lower natural gas prices. But again, we can't opine on success right there, only that we're going to roll up our sleeves, look at things that are small but make sense, look at things that are a little bit larger, and it still makes sense. And relative to how does one look to the other, it depends on the asset type. Obviously where we bought back interest in the wells that we operate, we have an operating advantage there. So those things are really intuitive, make lot of sense, and you have a really strong margin there. As we look at opportunities where we don't currently operate, there are things where you can get a better discount rate on things, both smaller and larger, depending on the asset quality. Are those things well historied? Are they relatively newer where there's more subjective interpretation of the performance? Is there upside? Those are all things that we look at and value differently, depending on the assets. So hopefully I covered all your questions, David, please let me know if I haven't.

There is one more. I'm just curious, are you more likely to find good deals on small-sized acquisitions or maybe big deals, they are better deals because there are fewer bidders. And I'm also curious, how big a deal could you do?

Sure. Again, go back to my previous comment, I think there are great small ball deals. I think there are really good larger deals. We would have to have a string of pearls on the smaller deals where they may have a better cash-on-cash return. They're harder to string together to be as impactful. It's like the differences for our organic opportunities with our capital workover program that have really high rates of return versus our prior drilling campaign that still had high rates of return, a little bit less but contributes more meaningfully on a value basis. So we think there's justification for looking at both because there's different drivers between each of those options and know that we're going to do something that makes sense.

Okay. I'll just say that personally I think there is dislocation in your share price given your net cash balance, your asset, your low-cost operations. Personally, I think that the stock is dislocated from the value that it offers shareholders.

Well, appreciate your comment, David. I think that's something that we look at consistently from day to day, make sure we're making good long-term decisions. And we want to ensure that when we do repurchase shares, we're doing it at a level that also have good returns. So we're valuing that option right alongside all the other options, so it's not an either or answer. But know that will continue to [Technical Difficulty] as we move forward through the year.

[Operator Instructions]. There are no further questions at this time. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.