Good morning. And welcome to Vivid Seats' Fourth Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. Following management's prepared remarks, we will open the call for Q&A. I would now like turn the call over to Kate Copouls. Please go ahead.

Good morning, and welcome to Vivid Seat's fourth quarter 2022 earnings conference call. I am Kate Copouls, Head of Investor Relations at Vivid Seats. Joining me today to discuss Vivid Seats results are Stan Chia, Chief Executive Officer; and Larry Fey, Chief Financial Officer. By now, everyone should have access to the company's fourth quarter earnings press release filed earlier this morning. We have also provided supplemental earnings slides. The press release and earnings slides are available on the Investor Relations page of Vivid Seats' website at investor.vividseats.com. During the course of this call, management may make forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements are subject to the risks and uncertainties as described in the company's earnings press release and other filings with the SEC. On today's call, we will refer to adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin, which are non-GAAP financial measures that provide useful information for our investors. You will find a historical reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin to the corresponding GAAP measure in the earnings press release, supplemental earnings slides and SEC filings. And now, I would like to turn the call over to Stan.

Good morning everyone. And thank you for joining us today. 2022 was a stellar year for live events and an exceptional year for Vivid Seats. Our team capitalized on strong demand, continued to innovate and expand our suite of leading marketplace products, navigated the competitive landscape with agility and delivered on financial and strategic objectives that strengthened our business for 2023 and beyond. Larry will take you through the fourth quarter and full year 2022 financial results in detail and discuss our outlook for 2023. But first, I'd like to share highlights from our first full year as a public company and discuss the progress we've made on strategic objectives. Looking first at the most recent fourth quarter, I am proud to report that we generated $846 million of Marketplace GOV, $165 million of revenues and $34 million of adjusted EBITDA. For the full year 2022 we delivered Marketplace GOV of $3.2 billion, revenues of $600 million and adjusted EBITDA of $113 million. At Vivid Seats we commit as a team to achieve our goals. Over the last year, we've demonstrated our ability to leverage our robust tools and execute adeptly regardless of the environment, which became more challenging as the year progressed. We continued to set new records in 2022 with Marketplace GOV and revenues both surpassing 2021’s records by more than 30%. 2022 Marketplace GOV and revenues also exceeded our initial guidance midpoint by 10%. Even with unprecedented competitive pressures in the second half, we delivered adjusted EBITDA within our guidance range while making deliberate investments to drive higher customer lifetime value. As we all witnessed, 2022 was a phenomenal year for the live event industry. Live events were back and then some after seeing some cancellation impact from the Omicron variant in the first quarter, the risk…

Thanks Stan. I'll begin with the discussion of our fourth quarter and full year 2022 results, before turning to our outlook for 2023. The fourth quarter was a compelling cap-stone to our first year as a public company. We delivered another strong quarter and with that hit our revised full-year guidance for each of Marketplace GOV, revenues and adjusted EBITDA. Our fourth quarter 2022 Marketplace GOV of $846 million decreased 3% year-over-year, driven by a 4% decline in total marketplace orders, which was impacted by a lower than normal number of MLB championship series games along with competitive dynamics. For the full year 2022, we delivered $3.2 billion of Marketplace GOV up 33% year-over-year and 40% higher than pre-pandemic levels. Fourth quarter average order size came in at $388, up slightly year-over-year and 9% above Q4 2019. Our quarterly AOS was volatile throughout 2020 and 2021, but has since returned to the 3% to 4% annual CAGR we have seen historically. Our fourth quarter 2022 revenues of $165 million increased 1% year-over-year, and our take-rate was 16.6%. For the full year revenues of $600 million increased 35% year-over-year and our take-rate was 16.0%. Our full year take-rate which is calculated by dividing our marketplace revenues by our Marketplace GOV was consistent with historical levels when considering the impact of our loyalty program, which is accounted for as a reduction to revenue. Some quarterly variation in our take-rate is normal due to the mix of event categories. We also experienced additional quarterly take-rate variation in 2022 as we refined our loyalty program assumptions throughout the year, resulting in relative take-rate headwinds in the first half of the year compared to the second half. In the fourth quarter, we generated $34 million of adjusted EBITDA at a 20% adjusted EBITDA margin. For…

Thanks Larry. In conclusion, it was a record 2022 for Vivid Seats and the broader live event industry, and I'm proud of what our committed and talented team achieved. I'm confident that our team, our strategy, our investments, our technology and our balance sheet put us in an excellent strategic position to capture and deliver value both in the near- and long-term. And with that operator, I will open it up for questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question coming from the line of Stephen Ju with Credit Suisse. Your line is open.

Okay. Thank you. So well, I guess concerts as you guys mentioned particularly strong in 2022. Can you talk about what the mix of events might look like for this year and if we're indeed going to be looking at a scenario in which sports begin to index higher and concerts lower maybe even back to what the mix was in 2019. Can you talk about how your customer retention rates may change because I would imagine there's probably greater frequency among the sports fans? And I think both you and Stan – Stan and Larry you guys have both mentioned expectation that customer acquisition costs will otherwise normalize. So what gives you the confidence that we will see that perhaps even this year or maybe over the longer term, because not all of its within your control, but if you can speak to what's driving that confidence that would be helpful? Thanks.

Yes. Good morning, Stephen. Thanks for the questions. Stephen maybe I'll take a little bit of where we think our investments in some of the repeat rate dynamics that's been? And then certainly let Larry kind of talk to you about how we anticipate the full year and the mix shaking out.

Yes. In a world where you see rising customer acquisition like we talked about, I think it's really important that you continue to invest in the long-term sustainable things. And I think what we've talked about this quarter, which we're really thrilled about is our investments are really starting to pay dividends, most notably in the forms of our highest repeat rates that we've ever seen amongst our customers. And that's really spread across the categories, right? I think it would be different if we said we saw higher repeat rates in sports versus concerts and we're mixing into a total higher repeat rate. But when we look at our investments in the loyalty program, some of our engagement protocols, but we're happy to see is that. We're seeing repeat rates higher in every single category that we participate in. And beyond that, as we continue to drive that repeat behavior, we also continue to mix more profitably into a repeat segment of customers. All of that, frankly allowing us to participate in a very CAC intensive environment where some of those effects might look muted at the bottom line, but internally all of that core strength is there, which I think allows us to one, sustain for the very long term; and two, when that environment rationalizes you'll see a lot of leverage in terms of what we're driving into repeat users as it flows through to the bottom line.

And just building on that, on the mixed question, I don't think we anticipate a meaningful shift from the 2022 mix into 2023 and it's been reasonably balanced and we see in our business have talked about 60% between concerts and theater, 40% in sports at the pre-pandemic level, and we are almost right on top that for 2022. So maybe a few basis points here and there of variance, but nothing that would impact overall mix in a meaningful way [indiscernible].

Thank you.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our next question coming from the line of Ralph Schackart with William Blair. Your line is open.

Good morning. Thanks for taking the question. First question just curious, now that you're almost through Q1; how is the quarter trending, I guess after coming off of 2022? And then as you think about 2023, can you just remind us what we expect for seasonality through the year that I'd follow-up with?

Yes. Thanks Ralph. The seasonality I would say is pretty similar to what we've historically pointed to 23% to 24% of our full year GOV in each of quarters one, two and three. And in the balance coming in Q4, which we expect will remain our strongest quarter of the year. Against that, I'd say we've seen robust performance and demand continue into Q1, which we're excited to see. Leading about the year-over-year comparison that we're lapping, last Q1 and this will hopefully be the last time we ever say this, we were fighting COVID, the omicron variant, which impacted the January volume. And then we had abnormal cancellations for non-COVID reasons, the MLB issues swaying the ARPU traders. So we have not seen those recur, you see just being canceled but in general much lower canceled than prior year. No COVID impact. So I think we are expecting a pretty healthy year-over-year Q1 performance. The other part I've noted, we've been a little wider on some of our marketing efforts out of the gate in Q1 to make sure we have the target drives as we get to the back half of the year with full sports season. So maybe actually see some margins above full year levels in the quarter.

Great. And then Stan, you talked about brand investments helping repeat rates, maybe just kind of help us think through those investments for 2023 and how they could continue to, I guess, benefit the repeat rates to potentially offset some of the higher levels of CAC that you're seeing?

Yes. Sure thing, Ralph. I think we've seen a lot of success. When we look at our loyalty program, the components of that driving increase repeat rate. I think whether we're building that into the economics of our buy 10 get one free program, whether it's the experiential components, I think we continue to look to innovate along those dimensions, can we find new things that drive differentiated value to users? And I think you'll see us continue to drive integrated and innovative play options through Vivid Picks. We've talked about having our user base there on that platform just grow 300% on a year-over-year basis where we can then use those two ecosystems to drive engagements where – where we're looking at that with, now I think on average close to 15 entries per month on that. So when you put together kind of innovation in the loyalty program itself, combined with an engagement vehicle with 15 entries per month, I think we feel pretty good about the ability to continue to drive increased engagement and loyalty to our collective ecosystem and platform.

Great. Thanks Stan. Thanks Larry.

Thank you. And our next question coming from the line of Maria Ripps from Canaccord. Your line is open.

Great. Thanks so much for taking my questions. First appreciate all the color around the 2023 outlook. Can you maybe just talk about how sort of competitor marketing spend has been trending so far this year and what is embedded in your outlook in terms of expectations for competitor marketing activity? And then I have a quick follow up.

Yes, thanks Maria. I think throughout 2022 we saw a fairly consistent trend where competitor intensity was increasing with a particular shift upward starting in early Q3. That intensity continued through Q4. I'd say for the large part, it's continued into Q1 and so we have presumed that persists throughout the year in our guidance. I think we've alluded to it before, but we continue to be of the mindset that one can only lose money for so long before gravity catches you. And so if we don't want to predict the win with too much precision, but it does feel like the current environment that has persisted in the Q1 feels unsustainable given some of the – our understanding of some of the profitability implications of those decisions for others.

Got it. That makes sense. Thanks Larry. And then secondly, there's been a lot of sort of increased regulatory scrutiny on the music industry of late with the Justice Department sort of having recently opened an antitrust investigation into Live Nation. So I’d love to hear your view on sort of on the government potentially taking some form of action to promote increased competition and how might that impact your business and the secondary ticketing market more broadly?

Yes. Sure, hey Maria. Look, I think it starts from just fundamentally a belief that, I think we have strongly that promoting competition is a good thing, and when fair competition exists we see platforms like Vivid Seats continue to innovate on behalf of fans with, as we talk a lot about here, best-in-class customer service, a loyalty program that continues to drive differentiated value, Vivid Picks; that all exists when there's a fair competition. I would say rather than comment directly on what they're doing, I think with a bunch of senators recently reviewed the industry, and I think the focus and the perspective of that investigation is fairly clear. I think when you have large vertically integrated players who potentially leverage their advantages deceitful competition, I think the end result for that is that anyone who plays by the rules is going to benefit. And in our space, I think about things which have great momentum like legislative ticket transferability, transparency into real supply and demand, transparency into pricing where in particular our lean cost structure always allows us to be competitive. I look at that and say as there continues to be scrutiny, anything that promotes fair competition in this space, I think Vivid Seats is well poised to take advantage of and we look forward to seeing how that plays out.

Great. Thank you very much.

Thank you. And our next question coming from the line of Thomas Forte with D.A. Davidson. Your line is now open.

Great, thanks. So first off, Stan and Larry, congrats to the quarter and year. I have two compare and contrast questions. I'll ask one and then the second is a follow-up. So first, can you compare and contrast the sales and profitability of performance marketing versus brand marketing?

Yes. I'd say as we've experiment there's a little bit of a time longitudinal answer, Tom as we've gone deeper into brand marketing one of our tenants has been, we don't want to put too much gas on the fire until we feel like we've at a minimum replicated the lifetime economics. And so as we talked about some of our experimenting and trying to unlock that brand marketing angle, that that was part of the journey. With some of the experiments that, that we've been able to complete throughout 2022, we feel pretty good to achieve that, and that the economics on the brand side will at least replicate. What we've been able to deliver on the performance marketing side, with that basically different timing where you spend some of the brand dollars up-front with a little more of a lag before you get the return relative to performance marketing that's more immediate feedback. But alongside that, we take the brand – a customer acquired through brand channels likely has higher repeat, higher longevity, higher LPD. So on a dollar percentage term basis we think it'll be these people and the data we're seeing now actually suggests it may be better.

Great. And then for my second question, can you compare and contrast consumers returning to live events from influences – historical influences, like fear of missing out versus a reflection of COVID-19 not unlike revenge travel?

Yes. I can take a first crack at that. I think as we've looked at our guide for the year, there's a combination of both order volume and AOS dynamics that could tie into a pent-up demand thesis. And I think our view has been the average order size of things, it looks like that's largely normalized and we exited 2022 at what I'd consider our historical trend-line. On the order side similarly sports is now entering its third year of being reopened, so I think we're well through that. We did, I think expressed some caution relative to perhaps other perspectives out in the market on what the concert vibrant fee may look like this year. But overall in a world where we think 7% to 10% annual long-term growth is where this industry fits, and we were up 40% in 2022 relative to 2019. Having 2023 is a flat-ish year kind of catches you up the trend-line and in no way changes our expectation of trend-line. And I think we alluded to a few doses of caution around exactly what the lack of postponed concerts can do to overall industry volumes. A little bit of caution around what competitor posture may look like, but that's not to say there's not opportunity for outperformance on both of those metrics.

Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question coming from the line of Jason Bennett from Citi. Your line is open.

I know there's a little complexity analyzing this sales and marketing costs as a percentage of revenue, and I say complexity just given the impact of the loyalty being book this contract revenue. But the sales and marketing as a percentage of your revenue seems like it's been balancing around between 40% and 42% over the last four quarters. It doesn't sound as bad as your rhetoric about the higher competitive intensity and higher CAC. So I was just wondering if you could just unpack that a little bit or maybe I'm looking at the wrong metric?

Yes. No, I think it's an astute question and you make our comments around some of our agility and the levers that we have to poll. I think that's exactly what we're speaking to and in Q4 as an example, I made conscious decision to let some volume that was of unattractive profitability go in favor of maintaining profitability and holding the line on that marketing efficiency. I think the other thing that that we've seen is a shift in terms of our customer mix towards repeat customers and away from fishing in the free agent pool that has gotten particularly expensive. And so it gets us really excited, again without trying to predict exactly which quarter it happens, but with a strong effect that eventually happens when the cap normalizes, I think we expect to really see that benefit in the new customer acquisition where we pulled back a bit.

Got it. That's super helpful. Thank you.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our next question coming from the line of Benjamin Black from Deutsche Bank. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning. Thank you for the questions. Larry, I think you allotted this earlier but on Live Nation's earnings call, they mentioned no signs of a slowdown. In fact, they expect even more robust trends into 2023, yet you're seeing saying that 2023 growth should be more muted. So it'd be great if you could sort of bridge that disconnect there? And then Stan, in your prepared remark you highlighted Skybox Drive; I'd be curious to hear your perspective on how that new offering has been received or what the early results have demonstrated so far? And how should it impact the P&L going forward longer term? Thank you.

Yes. So I'll take the first part on Live Nation. So we certainly saw a big bag. And I think in some ways we've seen similar to them, and then there's places where we diverge in terms of comparability. They quoted a lot of metrics on January to mid-February, performance being quite robust. We think they alluded to it, but we can confirm that we are seeing directionally similar trends in terms of very strong year-over-year performance and year-to-date period. Where I think we perhaps diverge a bit is one just having a slightly more cautious view of what the impact of postponed events not recurring being at the end of Q2 and Q3 on the concert side. I think they are overweight concerts when you look at their business overall, whereas concert at half of our business, so if you believe there's a more geared growth outlook in sports that'll pull it down a little bit. And then the last variable is, I think they alluded to international being quite strong, international be opening a little bit later. So I think there's a little bit of a handoff between global strength in the first couple months and their guidance and then international perhaps carrying a little bit higher growth to back half of the year relative to we anticipate seeing in North America.

I'll take the second part, Ben. I think we're really excited to announce Skybox Drive, right? So I think when we announced that early last week, I'd say early signs of interest is through the roof. I think we are very proud of the platform that we built on Skybox and Skybox Drive is an additional kind of product line that we're launching next to that to further help the seller community as a turnkey solution to Skybox, I think, has received tons of interest. We are in our beta period, I would say the minute we announced and open the beta, we were oversubscribed within the first two minutes to how many people wanted to participate. And I think if that's a good indicator, I think, that would underlie the fact that, I think, there is going to be a lot of demand and interest in the product that we are building. As we continue to do on all of our lines, I think, we're going to evaluate what the right economics are and if there is an opportunity to make sure there is value that we can derive from that product line, I think, we'll do so, but we're probably a little too early to talk about long-term P&L impact of Skybox Drive right now.

Great. Thank you very much.

Thank you. And our next question is coming from the line of Logan Reich from RBC. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. It's Logan on for Brad Erickson. Just another one on marketing spend. What's your guys' philosophy? I know you said you guys pulled back a little bit on the performance marketing spend in Q4, but as you go forward into 2023 on the full year, what's your expectation for competitive marketing intensity? And what is your philosophy on kind of matching that versus pulling back a bit on the less profitable orders for the full year? Thanks.

Yes, I'd say embedded in our guidance, we have assumed current environment persists throughout the year, i.e. intensity above what we believe is long-term sustainable. We're certainly hoping that that cracks, but didn't want to build that into the baseline. And so, we'll see what comes from there.

Yes, I think…

And maybe the bright way to hone this too as we think about the timing impact, which I think, is front of everybody's mind, which we just don't know how long it persists. I think the right question, which we certainly oriented around is when you spend, whether that's in the form of marketing, whether that's in the form of degraded take rate, all the things that we're seeing now in the industry, the question is just when you stop spending that and when you stop degrading your take rate, does that volume remain? And if that volume doesn't remain, then all of that acquisition is just unsustainable. So our perspective has always been, we are in this for the long haul and as we've prioritized, I think, making sure that we are diligent and smart about how we invest to both remain profitable, drive growth, and continue to grow our cash balance for potential offensive inorganic activities, I think, what you see is continued investment in the sustainable cohorts of customers that we continue to reap benefit from both now and we think even more so in the long term.

And just to wrap it up, I certainly don't – I do need to strike a balance, right? We're not going to roll over and let competitors it keep the volume without a fight. Similarly, we're not going to follow them down what we think is somewhat short-sighted path. So finding the balance between those two into the pockets where you can pursue the most economic volume, the most economic customers in terms of lifetime value, that's where we feel like a lot of our commentary around our unique data, and some of our agility and marketing capabilities can really show it though.

Great. Thanks for the color.

Thank you. And our next question coming from the line of Daniel Kurnos with Benchmark. Your line is now open.

Yes, thanks. Good morning. I know you guys just tried to kind of put an exclamation point on sort of your strategy. I guess the question that we get is in this environment and given the uncertainty of the consumer, if you put further pressure on your competitors, would you not accelerate sort of the cut off or do you not think that's a possibility given how much better your balance sheet is? And given look, we understand that the dynamics are somewhat like online travel when there is certain segments of cohorts that will be loyal to one, and then there will be certain segments of the cohort group that were probably loyal to none and just to price alone. And it feels like your competitors are: a) have no tools to get better loyalty; and b) are more efficient in that non-repeat rate bucket. But is there no way that you guys could put incremental pressure on them beyond just sort of striking the balance given how strong your balance sheet is right now?

Yes, it's a great question, Dan, and it's a topic that we wrestle with a fair bit. I think if we saw an opportunity to clearly accelerate that, we would lean into it. I think the flip side is we can't speak with precision or conviction around what fundraising or capital access looks like for competitors. And so, we're trying to take a balance where we continue to put pressure, steady pressure that gets to the end result we want, but also doesn't unduly camper near term performance only to find out that they have more capital stashed away.

Yes. And Dan, I know you sort of said, alluded to this in your remarks, but I kind of reemphasize to a certain extent, we are doing what you're suggesting in our investments, right. Because as you think about it, look, everybody who repeats with us is in order that we've taken away from somebody else. And where we've seen again, the various increase in repeat rates across categories for us at the highest levels it's ever been, I think, that's certainly something we continue to drive down and every time that happens is an incremental order since they are all increased repeat rates with a higher mix into that, we think that's actually a very strong accelerant into, call it the sustainability of our competitors.

Got it. I mean, that makes sense. And then just on the mix that those interesting that you guys actually spent less sequentially online in Q4 and more offline, which obviously talks to the brand spend that you guys are pushing here, even though it seems like everybody else wants to push performance, but I get the dynamics are different here. How much of the brand is more towards Vivid Seats versus internally you are just investing on some of the gamification aspects and trying to make it your point as you called out and more integrated into the process versus, kind of just broader Vivid Seats’ brand awareness, just remember, hey, we still have really small unaided brand awareness and if we can bring that up and we get people into the ecosystem that way.

Yes. I will start Dan. I mean, couple of different things. I think where you've seen a lot of our honing of our brand spend is into channels that, I think, we're starting to see increased economic performance, right? I think if you recall maybe in 2021 we tested a lot of very heavy media-oriented channels that, I think, we were not as pleased with some of the kind of time horizon in return to that drive. I think we have found some great channels. As we talk about our ability to drive brand into other more programmatic areas. And where we've seen a lot of success you call out Vivid Seats, but I think, we're certainly excited about that. I think if you looked at what we've done in the fourth quarter, and certainly into first quarter and some of our more programmatic brand channels. We've got our Real Rewards for Real Fans campaign, right. I think that continues to resonate with fans that continues to drive a halo around our performance both in normal performance channels and frankly as a direct channel itself for acquiring users. So I think we've been pleasantly surprised by the efforts on our marketing team to so quickly find a brand channel that has both driven the halo, but also the performance itself. And I think we've seen that resonate really around one of our core propositions, which we've invested in for a while now, which is rewards. And I think the fans speak that that campaign is something that matters to them and that value prop is something they will continue to reward with purchases from us. And I think – go ahead Larry.

Vivid Seats at $3 billion plus of ticketing is going to command the significant preponderance of marketing, both performance and brand. We are targeting Vivid Picks opportunities, particularly where it’s deep into the ecosystem, but you should think of the significant majority of that brand spend being on for ticketing offering.

I would have assumed that, Larry, I just didn't know if there was like an incremental push, but that's helpful. And just something, just a housekeeping I guess, Larry, a little more than that on your comments that it sounds like you said free cash generation is going to normalize in 2023. I know there were some puts and takes in 2022. So you guys are going to be in a firmly net cash position this year assuming that you have your typical conversion the way that that kind of plays out. So how are you thinking about kind of that benefit in this environment? You hold onto your cash, you pay down your debt, you push share buyback more even with stock? Just help us move through that.

I think yes, to considering all the standard possibilities, we didn't touch on it much, but we did complete a significant share repurchase effort through with 32 million repurchased under our program through year end, which I think, is a testament to our willingness to repurchase shares balanced by, we have a little bit less scope than we would like. And so there is some limit in the short term on the amount of shares we can repurchase. On the debt side of things, the current interest rate environment with our cash balance approximating our debt balance, but we're effectively synthetically hedged as rates have gone up. So, our interest expense hasn't really moved commensurate, so we feel like it's still a reasonable price pay for the optionality, whether it relates to comment I just say for M&A whether that be adjacencies or more meaningful opportunities. I think that's something that we continue to review. So, we like seeing the strong, robust balance sheet. I think it ties in a little bit to the competitive landscape and some of the comments we made about competitive P&Ls, but I think, having the gold plated balance sheet alongside that gives us great confidence in our ability to come out the other side of this stronger than ever.

Great. Thanks for sticking with me. I appreciate all the color guys.

Thank you. And our next question coming from the line of Shweta Kajaria from Evercore ISI. Your line is open.

Okay, thank you. Stan, could you please provide a little bit more detail on Skybox Drive? So, how does that work and understood your commentary on economics of it, but where do you think will it have the most impact post scale launch? Thank you.

Sure. Yes, look, I think, all sellers look for ways to maximize revenue. And I think in the auto pricing arena, there are multiple payers that provide that service. What's been unique about our divisions along Skybox Drive is we've never had a turnkey solution integrated into our Skybox platform that allows for kind of an immediate auto pricer to be turned on. We've also never allowed others to utilize some of our industry leading marketplace data to drive some of their revenue optimization strategies. I think those two things have strongly been in demand by the seller community, and we were happy to provide that, which again, I think, nobody else will be able to provide given that's all proprietary. So in the long term as we launch that, we remain really excited about the fact that we can grow the install base, the Skybox Drive more stickiness to that and ultimately drive more value to our sellers. And in turn, all of those things feed our flywheel better data, better insight and potentially advantaged cost structure, again, that flows through from kind of an embedded revenue optimization system that functions in real time. As you think about the economics, like I said, I think, it's early for us, but I think it's safe to say that in the market, nobody gives an auto pricer away for free. So there is probably some incrementality there. But for us, I think, still a little too early to gauge what the long term impact is going to be.

Okay, thanks Dan.

Thank you. And our next question coming from the line of Andrew Marok from Raymond James. Your line is open.

Hi, thanks for taking my question. It's been asked kind of a couple of times in different ways, but I kind of want to address it directly. So, in the overall space, I mean the consumer experience has kind of been built on trust and there have been pretty decent repeat loyalty rates, et cetera. Have there been kind of any changes in the overall brand loyalty of a customer within the industry with kind of the puts and takes, obviously you guys are seeing good progress on your loyalty and rewards program, kind of counteracted with the increased marketing spend around the industry going for that kind of free agent pool. Thank you.

Andrew, I think, maybe two things to point to. One, clearly what we can see is that our repeat rates are higher than ever. I think the buttress that maybe as a point against others, we’ve tracked a lot of social sentiments amongst the competitive landscape, which you might argue it could be a leading indicator into brand loyalty. And I think what we've felt really good about is that since we started looking at that every month since we've been tracking social sentiment, we've always been number one or two, where historically we've not shown up, I think, in the top, five probably. So I think being in the first and second position combined with our ability and our kind of proven now increase in repeat rates, I would say we probably out indexed the competitive landscape.

Great. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question coming from the line of Matt Farrell from Piper Sandler. Your line is open.

Thanks guys. Maybe just how are you thinking about the broader macro and maybe consumer spending as it relates to the full year guide? And maybe digging a little bit deeper, how do you delineate maybe the competitive pressures that you are seeing between potentially it being some softening consumer trends? Thanks.

Yes, I think we continue to similar to some of our postures throughout the year last year, where we wanted to take a balance view where we certainly reflected some awareness of risk inherent in the market whether it be COVID or economic concerns. I think we can pitch that perspective. So, I alluded to it. We are not seeing anything in the numbers that would suggest the consumer is weakening at the moment, but we also see all the same headlines that everyone on this call does and can prudence to build in some possibility or possibility of that in particularly in the second half of the year. And so again, similar to last year, should that not manifest that would be a positive incremental to what we contemplated. Yes, I think if you find yourself in a world where consumer and most industry backdrop were to weaken, meaningfully from where we are, I think, that's a scenario where we long term get excited and short term to be a bit of pain, but I think that will really disproportionately hit competitors that are already running on the edge of cliff.

Yes. Yes, I think that just hones in the point, right. I think when you look at, I think, what we've invested in and what we've built and the decisions that we've made, I think, what we've really have is a long term sustainable model with really great unit economics, investments that, I think, we believe will get a lot of leverage on in the long term, whether that's our repeat rates in our loyalty program, whether that's engagement in Vivid Pix, or even more recently, I would say, truly long-term economically, sustainable brand channels, right? So I think when we look at it we've certainly been conservative as we look at the guidance for 2023 in terms of, I think, as Larry said, the best way to look at it is, look, there's a lot of chatter around that, we want to make sure we've accounted for those scenarios. But in a world where any of that happens, I think, we continue to have the strongest balance sheet probably out there of all the pure secondary marketplaces along with strong unit economics and strong key indicators for sustained growth and sustained profitability. And I think that ultimately is what has us excited about continuing to win in the long term.

Thank you. And I am showing no further questions in the queue at this time. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This does concludes your program. And you may now disconnect. Everyone have a great day.