Good afternoon, and welcome to the Serra Prognostics Conference Call to Review Third Quarter Fiscal Year twenty twenty five Results. At this time, all participants are in listen only mode. We will be facilitating a question and answer session towards the end of today's call. As a reminder, this call is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the call over to Jennifer Zebuda, CERA's Head of Investor Relations for a few introductory comments. Sarah? Please go ahead. Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, everyone.

Welcome to Sare Prognostics Third Quarter Fiscal Year twenty twenty five Earnings Conference Call. At the close of market today, SeraPrognostics released its financial results for the quarter ended 09/30/2025. Presenting for the company today will be Genya Lyngard, President and CEO and Austin Eretz, our CFO. During the call, we will review the financial results we released today after which we will host a question and answer session. If you've not had a chance to review our quarterly earnings release, it can be found on our website at sarah.com. This call can be heard live via webcast at sarah.com, and a recording will be in the Investors section of our website. Please note some of the information presented today may contain projections or other forward looking statements about events and circumstances that have not yet occurred, including plans and projections for our business, future financial results, and market trends and opportunities. These statements are based on management's current expectations and the actual events, or results may differ materially and adversely from these expectations for a variety of reasons. We refer you to the documents the company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission specifically the company's annual report on Form 10 its quarterly reports on Form 10 Q, and its current reports on Form eight ks. These documents identify important risk factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those contained in our projections and other forward looking statements. Will now turn the call over to Genya.

Thank you, Jennifer.

And good afternoon, everyone. Building on the momentum from our PRIME study and ongoing commercialization efforts in the 2025, marked continued progress in our transition toward pretrum test adoption. We advanced our geographically focused strategy In these regions, we are executing an integrated approach to achieving fair coverage, physician education, and patient awareness. We've continued to build visibility through key industry events and data presentations. Earlier this week, we presented health economics data at the International Society for Pharmaconomics and Outcomes Research. Or ISPOR, Europe. Conference. In October, doctor Brian Eerie delivered a compelling presentation of PRIME study outcomes at the inaugural Renaissance Conference. The three ages of the woman, titled dismantling the preterm barrier, biomarker guided bundle care to improve neonatal outcomes. Links to both the poster and the presentation are now available in our press release issued today. We remain on track to publish the full results of our PRIME study in a peer reviewed journal by the end of the year. We're very far along through the process of preparing a publication, and we look forward to sharing it with all stakeholders. You can expect from us is a press release upon acceptance for publication followed by an investor and analyst event with our principal investigators to discuss the strong primary outcomes we shared earlier this year. As well as some new and compelling data points from the study demonstrating the efficacy of the preterm test. Following PRIME, we plan to maintain a steady cadence of data publications and presentations focused on key topics including health economic benefits, population analysis, for example, first time moms versus other moms, and Medicaid expected cost savings associated with SARA preterm test. These data subsets will build on the robust evidence base already established by our PRIME and AVERT clinical studies.…

As additional pilots launch,

we will use the resulting data to demonstrate feasibility and build a strong business case for statewide coverage. Our commercial commercialization strategy in the immediate term will focus on this target geography adoption wave by wave until guideline inclusion. Success of these efforts depends on achieving coverage in Medicaid and commercial plans, value based care arrangements, and activating physician adoption and advocacy. Engagement with clinical leaders and alignment on target populations will be critical to securing guideline inclusion and accelerating adoption. Post guidelines, will scale nationally with a field sales force aiming for broader payer coverage and expand national awareness building through traditional marketing channels. Although guideline inclusion is a longer term milestone, our focused efforts both in evidence generation KOL engagement, targeted state coverage, and physician adoption are all needed to support it. Ultimately, the strategy positions us to drive meaningful revenue growth while improving outcomes for mothers and babies nationwide in helping address health care utilization trends, including rising costs associated with NICU admission rates and longer hospital states, stays surrounding maternal and neonatal care. To provide clear visibility into our accelerating commercial execution, even at this early stage, we will begin sharing some key traction indicators such as Medicaid pilot momentum, including number of live pilots, enrollment completion milestones, and expanding pipeline of state in discussions? That will serve as tangible markers of progress as we build towards the sustainable revenue growth. We're gaining meaningful traction across the payer landscape. We're actively engaging with 10 payers across 13 states. A diverse mix, both national and regional, Medicaid and commercial, who are focused on offering a competitive health care benefits while managing rising costs. Our strategy targets forward thinking organizations will with strong member bases in key states, where our sales reps are positioned well to maximize pull…

With that,

I'll turn it over to Austin, our CFO, for a review of our financial results. Austin?

Thanks, Jenny, and good afternoon, everyone. I'll provide an overview of our financial performance for the 2025 and our balance sheet position. Net revenue for the third quarter was $16,000 compared to $29,000 in the same period last year. During the quarter, we received a $100,000 prepayment from the first Medicaid pilot in Nevada, which increased our revenue balance as of 09/30/2025. Total operating expenses for the quarter $9,000,000 compared to $8,900,000 in the 2024. Research and development expenses were $3,300,000 down from $3,500,000 for the 2024 primarily due to lower clinical study costs, following the completion of the pivotal PRIME study and as the company shifts towards commercialization. Selling, general, and administrative expenses $5,700,000, up from $5,400,000 for the prior year period, a modest increase as we carefully invest in targeted commercial activities and strategic headcount additions building market awareness in preparation for the publication of PRIME study data. Our net loss for the quarter was $7,800,000 down from $7,900,000 in the 2024 as we continued our focus on managing our capital resources ahead of revenue expansion in the future. As of 09/30/2025, we had cash, cash equivalents, and available for sale securities of approximately $102,400,000. We are encouraged by the commercial momentum that Genya discussed, including our first Medicaid pilot program in Nevada. We are diligently working to translate our foundational progress into tangible outcomes and significant growth opportunities. In the meantime, we continue to manage our capital prudently, prioritizing high ROI opportunities to support commercialization, while maintaining a strong balance sheet to fuel our growth strategy. Operator, we can now open the line for questions.

Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question and answer session. You will hear a prompt that your hand has been raised. And should you wish to cancel your request, please press star followed by the 2. If you are using a speaker phone, please lift the handset before pressing any keys. One moment please for your first question. Thank you. And your first question comes from the line of Dan Brennan from TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Great. Thank you. Thanks for the update. Maybe just on

the Medicaid pilots, Nevada, you've got six other states behind it or five other states behind it. I know at the Q2 call, discussed two to four pilots signed up kind of don't know what the time frame was, but was kind of in the near term. So do you feel like your progress is going on track? Do you feel ahead of plan, behind plan in terms of getting Nevada signed up and when do you think you'd have you know, get the four or, you know, get to the six pilots signed up?

Dan, thank you so much for the question. We're very much on track. One is launched in recruiting. Another one is in contracting. And so that gets us to two. And we believe a couple more shortly in active discussions with the payers in other states. So with that, the fact that we've expanded to the next wave of states tells you that we're very much on track on getting a foot in the door in each of the states and going beyond because we feel we have good traction even in the first wave of the states. So we'll definitely continue communicating progress once the pilots are up and running. Obviously, while we're in contracting, we're gonna probably not communicate what the states and the payers are. But but once we're underway with their permission, we'll we'll share it with all of you.

And how big are the pilots? So Navati, you said a 100,000 pre prepayment. Just how do we think about I know the criticality is to get it established so you can eventually get state Medicaid coverage. But just speak to and during the pilot phase, like, what's the what's the economics? Like, what are you getting paid to run these tests? How big the Nevada program? Just any color on that.

Sure. The trade offs here, Dan, are how fast we want results So, the fewer patients in the pilot, the faster the decision on coverage. Which, of course, would be best to driving outcomes for moms and babies sooner. The drive to have a bigger pilot, of course, is powering the pilot to show great results. Because, again, we are looking at reasonably rare events of significant preterm birth that we want to ameliorate. So from that perspective, the typical size of a pilot would probably be a few 100 patients. However, I will tell you, as we're engaging with plans, and state Medicaid directors, we're not only suggesting that we pilot, but we are in active discussions with some value based health care arrangements and contracts. Where we can show what the test can do when screening the moms in the state with achieving quality metrics and putting some dollars at risk as opposed to setting up a similar conversation in context of a pilot. So it's hard to tell you specifically because each state has a slightly or each payer has a slightly different arrangement. And size and scale of the program. Some payers and states are looking for a statewide contract that is value based. So obviously, that would be many thousands of patients as opposed to a few 100.

Does it help? Okay.

And and okay, and are you collecting, like, full price when you even though it's small, like, you know, hundreds of thousands, are you collecting the the full preterm birth price, or is it discount? Or just how does that work?

So, again, the

the specifics, I won't get into. But we are very happy with the price realization in these early engagements with payers, and state Medicaids. We don't know how that will evolve when we get to full scale coverage for the state, but we're optimistic with what we've seen to date.

Got it. And and then just in terms of PRIME, so so timing wise, you guys still feel confident it'll come before year end. So we got whatever, eight weeks? Oh, excuse me, like, six weeks left. So you think it'll come before then? So maybe just any more color on the confidence there if it slips a little bit, I guess, no big deal. But then b, just remind us of the additional data we're gonna get and what's gonna be impactful that'll come out in the publication that we didn't see so far.

Yeah. No, Dan. We are. And I know we've been talking about any day now for the last few quarters, but it truly is super close now, and we are confident it is coming in the coming in the coming week. Ideally before the end of the year. And in terms of specific data, of course, it would be it would be impossible to highlight the data before the publication itself, but what I can promise is as soon as the publication is out, we'll have an in-depth event to go over all of the new insights. I will highlight that the insights are coming from engagement with the reviewers. And as you know, we've talked about a series of publications coming out of mining an incredibly rich dataset that comes out from PRIME. So we pulled forward some of the insights that were coming in future publications because of the requests of the reviewers to to add that to the publication. So look forward to sharing that, but unfortunately I can't highlight those until until publication date.

Got it. Let me let me be one more. Just in terms of the path forward, a $100,000,000 in cash, You have these pilot studies. In the background. And then the prime study and then, obviously, guidelines. But as we think about the next one, two, three years, getting PRIME out, getting the pathway to guideline inclusion, whatever you need to do there, and then simultaneously, like you said, with these pilot studies. But on the on the guideline, you said in the past, I think, typical cadence is what twenty four to forty eight months post publication. Is that still your best guess right now such that if the publication, let's say, comes out you know, in the next month, the '25, are we thinking more, like, '27, '29 is when guidelines could occur, and then, I guess, the focus between then and now would just be these pilot studies?

Okay. So a couple of questions on that. One. Yes, we are that is still twenty four to thirty six months is still a pretty good guesstimate, I would say. We are we've developed an engine to mine the data and, add, real world evidence to our portfolio, that certainly is going to be the best thing we can do. To influence and create literature for review for the guidelines to be updated. With the new tools that are available to clinicians. So that is a critical work stream for us and we're hoping that it will be truly a steady stream of data. In addition to mining prime data, of course, we talked about a real world evidence, which should see its first publication next year, as well as the data that's coming out of engagement with the plans and the states. Until the guidelines, I do think the key focus is this geographic focus in driving density of adoption in specific states Given our first target states represents over a third of birth in The United States, that's not small volume at all. That is plenty of work to get done and volume to drive. I don't want to just zero in and call it pilot engagement. Not at all. It's gonna be much broader than that, including policy positive policy coverage achievement across plans and value based care contract arrangements, and just driving physician adoption institution by institution in some of the multi hospital systems and women's health clinics. So a lot more to come on that, but please don't just focus on the pilots. Pilots is one tool in our toolkit. But indeed, it's gonna be a geography focused effort and post guidelines, we're going to move to a nationwide commercialization.

Got it. Okay.

Great. Well, I've taken up, like, four questions, so I guess I'll stop there. Thank you. No. No problem at all. Thank you for

the great questions.

Thank you once again. You have a question, please press 4 by the one on your telephone keypad. And your next question comes from the line of Andrew Brackmann from William Blair. Please go ahead.

Everyone. This is Maggie Bowie on for Andrew today. Thanks for taking our questions. Maybe first, just to start, can you walk through just once you have the prime publication in your hands, what your plans are there, and how you think about organizational readiness at this point once the prime publication comes hopefully before year end? Thank you so much, Maggie. Organizational readiness, we've been preparing for quite a few quarters for PRIME to come out. So what we've done is prepared the dialogue that can commence once the data is out, specifically policy review by payers. As you can imagine, without a peer reviewed publication, engagement is on the pilot basis and early early engagement. However, once we have the publication, the formal processes of review can commence. Within the payer institutions. So number one priority, as we mentioned, is getting coverage and reimbursement. So that's the first thing that organization will drive. Upon publication. Second, of course, is dissemination of information. With clinicians, education, awareness building. What you can anticipate is presence at conferences, a district conferences, seminars, CME events, We really want to get the data out to as many physicians and opinion leaders as possible. In parallel, of course, we are engaged with opinion leaders on the new data that is coming out of the PRIME that will shape new publications coming out of the data. Our field force is going to use as a third key thrust the prime publication to make sure that in all of our target states, we are driving physician adoption with the major institutions and hospitals who've been engaging with us under CDA around the data, to go ahead and drive education with all of their clinicians. With the publication in hand. So we feel the organization is very much ready with all of the appointments we've made this year with our chief commercial officer, Lee Anderson, with our chief medical officer, doctor Tiffany Inglis, a lot of roles within the commercial organization and hiring our sales force we are in great shape, to press go on our plan post publication. Great. Thank you for that. And then maybe just one just on the commercial team. You know, how should we be thinking about that build out as we get into 2026 once

the

prime publication is out there? And then just with that, how should we think about your SG and A expense in 2026? Thank you. Great question. I'll start with the commercial team size, and then, Austin, if you want to talk through the the SG and A question, that would be great. So Maggie, what we're aiming to do as we expand the the engagement with states and the payers and have the initial coverage established. We plan to expand the sales force to drive the pull through in those geographies. So each of the waves is about four to six states. So we staffed the first wave of six states You can anticipate that we will bring new sales reps and medical science liaisons to the next wave of states, as traction in those geographies is achieved. So we'll continue following our philosophy of investing behind the wins to put field personnel in place to drive engagement on the ground with physicians, with practices, with office managers, and opinion leaders.

So

Austin, do you wanna talk through on the parameters of our SG and A change anticipated in 2026,

Sure. Hi hi, Maggie. Thanks for the question. We're aiming next year to keep expenses relatively similar to the way they are this year while also shifting a lot of our capital allocation certainly towards sales and marketing activities. So we do expect to see a relatively significant increase on the sales and marketing line while overall expenses stay relatively flat.

Great. Thank you both.

Thank you so much, Maggie. We're excited to reallocate capital to commercialization. From our main evidence generating activities over the last couple of years. Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. Ms. Lingard, please proceed with closing remarks. Thank you so much. Before we close the call, I just want to the strong foundation we've built this quarter with advancing the evidence generation, accelerating commercial execution, and strengthening our leadership team. With the first Medicaid pilot live and active engagement across 13 states, and key hires in place, we're really well positioned to drive adoption of the test and delivering meaningful impact in maternal and neonatal outcomes. Looking ahead, we remain focused on disseminating prime results, expanding payer coverage, and working towards guideline inclusion. Thank you all so much for the continued support as we work towards transforming prenatal care and creating long term value for patients, providers, and shareholders. Over to you, operator. To close the call.

Thank you. And this concludes today's call. Thank you for participating. You may all disconnect.