Yes, we do. We're looking at projects all the time. We'll see what -- which projects actually comes together and materialize this. But what we do see here is that have the lowest order book on a relative scale since the mid-1990s, which was a record low order book level. And we see a lot of phaseout of older vessels because there was a huge wave of vessels that came in the early 2000s, and they are now getting to 20 years of age, and therefore, very difficult to trade and very expensive to take through special surveys.
So that in itself could lead to a tightness of the market. But we've seen now with production cuts and floating storage on winding, we've seen that the near term, call it, the market has been quite soft. But this is a market, as we have seen in the past, it can turn very quickly, and the price elasticity here is quite interesting. But back to your question, I mean, about the tanker owners, I mean, what we -- you have 2 sets of call it, charters or leases, you have what we call just straight financing, sort of they're both financing at some advance rate, you've seen maybe 90% to 100% of value there both over time and a purchase obligation.
In our mind, that's a financing. And it's quite different from the deal we did on those Suezmax tankers where we run the vessels, we manage the vessels and where we have a profit split and there is incentive during the term of the charter to actually maximize returns by timing, potential sale of one or more of the vessels. So it's a much more opportunistic approach, while we think that we have our downside covered quite well through the base charter rate if it goes to the end of the charter period. So this is a market where we think being a little opportunistic, it can create value, but at the same time, in a defensive way.