Good morning, everyone. My name is Dennis, and I will be your operator today. Welcome to the Sigma Lithium First Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded and is broadcast live on Sigma's website. On the call today is the company's CEO, Ana Cabral-Gardner; and company Executive Vice President, Matthew DeYoe. We will now turn the call over to Matthew DeYoe.

Thank you, Dennis. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us on our first quarter 2024 earnings conference call. On the call with me today is company's CEO, Ana Cabral. This morning, before market open, we published our 1Q earnings release and posted our financial results, which would be available through SEDAR and SEC. Before we begin, I'd like to cover 2 items. First, during the presentation, you'll hear certain forward-looking statements concerning our plans and expectations. We note that actual events or results could differ materially from changes in market conditions in our operations. Additionally, earnings referenced in this presentation may exclude certain noncore and nonrecurring items. Reconciliations to the most comparable IFRS financial measures and other associated disclosures, including descriptions of adjustments can be found in the back of the release. With that, I'll pass it over to Ana. Ana?

Thank you, Matt. Good morning, everyone. We're delighted to present you with our first quarter 2024 results. And without further ado, I encourage you to go to the following page. We are extremely enthusiastic about our prospects as we have been advancing towards key catalysts of our plan to double production capacity by 2025. The 4 key deliveries of this quarter were: first, the delivery of an increased premium pricing where we achieved a fixed floating formula of 9% of the London Metals Exchange lithium equivalent, basically reaching a $1,290 pricing. That represented an 11% increase to the April 24 realized pricing. The numbers we released for the first quarter of 2024. So, that clearly demonstrates that the pricing trend is upwards, an 11% increase from previous months in an overall almost 30% increase from the average pricing of the previous quarter. The second catalyst is that we have been reaching our marks on achieving a low cost of production. We became the world's second lowest cost lithium concentrate producer this quarter, reporting the cost of $397 per ton. So more importantly, we have also managed to increase the operating life of the company to 25 years. We increased mineral reserves by 40%, auditing 77 million tonnes, 43-101. We also made a final investment decision on a fully funded expansion to double production to 520,000 tonnes annually, equivalent to 70,000 tonnes LCE. So, on the next page, we demonstrate that we've been delivering our vision to combine this large-scale production with low cost and higher standards of environmental and social sustainability in lithium. These 3 elements are rarely achieved together. More often than not, scale and costs are achieved at the expense of traceability and environmental high standards. Alternatively, scale and traceability and environmental and social high standards are achieved…

Thank you, Ana. So, in the first quarter, the company sold 52,857 tons of lithium concentrate, which composed of 2 full shipments and a partial sale of warehouse inventory to Glencore towards the end of the quarter. Production totaled just over 54,000 tons. Reported revenue in the quarter totaled $37.2 million, which included a $12 million impact from provisional adjustments associated with prior shipments, particularly our November shipment. This reduction or this is a reduction versus the $30 million we experienced in 4Q. The company assesses revenue for business conducted during the first quarter at $49 million. And against our volumes, that would imply a realized price for business again conducted in the first quarter of $930 a ton. Operating cash cost per ton at plant gate of $462 a ton, down about 16% sequentially and delivers a 50% FOB margin against that $930 per ton price. Reported adjusted EBITDA of $6 million drives a margin of nearly 16%. Though again, we assess EBITDA for business conducted in 1Q, and that's excluding the provisional implications at about $17 million, which reflects an EBITDA margin closer to 35%. Importantly, as we want to note, as prices rallied during the first quarter, the implications of these provisional adjustments subsided. And given our fixed shipment in April and the material correction we've seen in market prices; these adjustments should be immaterial going forward. I want to move, I guess, to our cost bridge. We believe our guided targets are very much in reach. Importantly, as well as we're moving past much of the noise associated with commissioning activity is really helping us deliver a much cleaner quarter and a cleaner look into the company's advantaged cost structure. Cash cost per ton, as Anna had mentioned earlier, was $397 for the first quarter, which…

So, going to -- straight to the point where Matt left off of doubling production capacity. Again, we show the drone aerial picture of the simplicity of that project. And you can clearly see in the back the expansion area highlighted in red, where we already have the truck maintenance patio installed. It's an area without vegetation. It's pretty -- it's basically former pasture areas. So, very straightforward, perpendicular to the elevation of the terrain, perfect for the installation of our ROM pad that will feed a second Greentech production plant. That second line trend will be equivalent to the one highlighted in yellow, and it will be sustained by the existing infrastructure in green, which also could sustain a third Greentech line expansion, which we do plan to execute the moment we commission the second Greentech plant. So, infrastructure, which costs almost $40 million, $45 million is no longer necessary because it sustains 2 additional Greentech plant expansions. So, with that, we again would like to reiterate that the cash to build it is at hand. We've been able to secure a robust and resilient trade lines as a result of our consistent, resilient performance of production, shipping, delivery, and customer acceptance of our product throughout the first 10 months of operation. So that reliability gives us access to green line mandatory funding. It's called ACEs in Brazil, advancements on export contract, which are the main source of funding for this construction at the moment. It's cash sitting in our treasury right now. We will continue to work to improve the capital structure for the construction of the project. And we have a very interesting plans to tap that capital markets -- that low markets throughout the course of the next few months. But without it or irrespectively of…

Yes. I mean again, from the perspective of the company, right, we have a unique track record of being able to build on time and on budget, and we're going to do that again. So as Ana had mentioned, April 1, Sigma's Board of Directors issued the Phase II FID. As we said, the CapEx budget is only about $100 million to add 250,000 metric tons, which is enough lithium equivalent for about 850,000 EVs. EPCM teams are finishing earthworks engineering and mobilization is ongoing. And Phase II flow sheet importantly follows Phase I. The goal is to reduce risks as much as possible as we go through this process. The local EPCM team is the same. The parts design team is the same. But we're going through Phase II with the knowledge and experiences gained through Phase 1, which should mean a faster ramp and a faster path to free cash flow as we move forward. This is just in a higher-level path to where we're going. And as Ana mentioned, there's a third phase coming on the back end, which is already supported through the infrastructure.

Yes. So here is kind of the whole picture, right? This is the industrial plan we submitted to our development bank and to our investors earlier in the year. And that kind of shows graphically where we are and where we had it, and how disciplined we have been in adding production capacity based essentially on the one element in short supply, our ability to execute on time and on budget and comfortably, because we're maintaining our operations at the highest standards of performance, we set out for ourselves. So, we got here in '23 what we've delivered over the last 12 months. So, '23 today, actually is 175,000 tonnes produced, so that goes over to now. Then we have that cash flow to propel us and to give us a base. That's our safety net, let's put it that way. And then if you annualize '24 from now, we would have 270,000 tonnes of production, and again, furthering that safety net of cash generation. So, we're building double capacity -- approximately double capacity, another Greentech line at 250,000 tonnes. So, we're in construction of what equates to 35,000 tonnes LCE. And then again, we're going to do the third line, as I showed you earlier, with the drone pictures that's supported by the existing infrastructure that will get us to another 250,000 tons. So, you get us to 770,000 tonnes of annual capacity. So approximately what we call the magic number of 100,000 tons of LCE a year. Gentlemen and ladies, there are very few companies that can actually deliver and operate at these levels and they are called the super majors. And with our careful, conservative, and disciplined execution, we plan to get there most likely at the beginning of 2026 with 3 Greentech production lines, and we…

Yes. Thank you, Dennis. If you can move now to Q&A, that would be great.

[Operator Instructions]. Your first question is from the line of Rob Hoffman with Bank of America.

Just wondering, can you provide the latest regarding the strategic review? And is that currently on pause?

Yes, it is. We've been publicly reiterated, that's on pause. And again, the reasons are quite clear. I mean, there's a symmetrical disconnect between what we believe our fair value should be. And we decided to -- given the strength and resilience of our operation that we will just continue to deliver. We have a fantastic business, and there's absolutely no pressure to conduct any review from our end. So, we will deliver on the targets we set out for ourselves, and probably emerge 2 years from now and decide what we were going to do for the next phase of growth.

Understood. And just to follow-up in regards to the LG press release regarding arbitration. Just wondering what the time line is on that and the updates on that process?

Well, we have a very friendly relationship with the LG Group and with South Korea. And there are going to be more positive news on that end that we're going to publicize in due course. But what I can say as of now is that the commercial relationship actually couldn't be better with the LG Group as a whole, and that includes their trading arms, which was actually visiting our plant facilities at the time, another subsidiary of the group, initiated arbitration, and kind of made everyone rather dumbfounded. But again, that's being mandate. And we just want to reiterate how we have a fantastic relationship with both the government of South Korea and with LG Group as a whole. And we don't see any reason to worry about it.

Dennis, if you want to move on to the next question?

Of course. Your next question from the line of Mac Whale with Cormark Securities.

Congratulations on bringing the cost down quite handily. I was wondering, can you speak a little bit to -- I saw 2 big items in there versus Q4 in mining services and consumables. What's such a big decrease in those 2 items in particular?

So, hey, Mac, on the consumables side, we got pretty effective in using our ferrosilicon and recycling that through the process. If you recall as well, we installed the magnetic separator in November. And part of that was on the tailing side of the equation and being able to improve our recyclability of ferrosilicon through our process. Also, some of these purchases may be a little bit lumpy, but we are getting better at optimizing and running the plant. So, that's going to explain a good portion of the consumable side. The decrease in the shared services, I'll have to double check. But look, as part of what we've said, we're removing a lot of on-site contractors and replacing them with domestic and local labor. So, as the roll-off happens, you're going to see perhaps an overall reduction in costs, but also a little bit of left pocket, right pocket as some of that stuff gets allocated and reallocated through our cost lines, if that makes any sense.

Yes. That's helpful. And then on the G&A, your various sort of underneath the operations line on the -- in some of your costs for G&A, in particular, was lower. Is that a good run rate now when you look at those line items going forward?

Yes. Look, G&A is -- obviously, as we try to portray on our 4Q call, right? There's a ton of noise and clutter in the annual SG&A number, and we had a lot of confidence that would come down. To the extent the strategic review is paused, obviously, some more costs will come out of the business. But it's at a pretty good level, considerably lower than where we were. And again, some of these productivity initiatives that we've been taking take a little bit of time to move through the system. You can't shut off all costs at the end of the year. Some of that stuff bleeds. But the goal is to keep a very draconian approach on all costs. If you talked to me recently, what I say is I really love $1,200 a ton spodumene because we can generate cash and we can grow in this market, but it also keeps everybody honest on costs. And so, you should expect the same level of -- I can't use the word draconian, but intensive cost control internally at Sigma to continue to deliver on these numbers to the best we can.

And do you think this is -- as the environment for pricing improves, are we going to see -- like how will the provisional pricing situations change as we move through the year?

I'll take that. Hey, Matt, it's Anna. The provisional pricing is, we believe, a commercial element of the past. And in our case, it doesn't really connect with as much with the market environment, but it's 100% connected to us basically beginning in the marketplace. A lot of what our clients experience of our product have been to what we call bulk samples, 100-ton, 200-ton samples. But this last 12 months was the first time they actually got to try full tonnages. And as it happened, the clients experienced the 20% to 30% cost savings, our product brought to them by themselves. So, they actually measured in their own refineries, the cost savings. So, that actually moved our commercial conversations to a completely different level because as we like to say, lithium prices globally, you're still in its infancy. It is as if copper concentrate nongame, and lithium prices for concentric would borrow from each. Like you would borrow purity from copper concentrate and you would borrow lump size from iron ore. And we don't -- we weren't seeing any of it in our high-purity course, lumpy product. So, we believe that as the clients experience the product and saw for themselves, the cost savings we brought to the refineries, they will be more amenable to a nonprovisional and final price conversations. And we demonstrated that first with the fixed pricing that we delivered last month. It was fixed and final, just like the great players in the industry like ALB and others. And then we now, this month, we moved to what we call the best place, the holy grayer of pricing, which is the fixed floating formula, where we work with our clients. That's how we say it's a partnership. We're not fixing their expense. We're floating to their quote, which is hydroxide LME, but we're fixing our value capture to their quotes. So, we're being friendly with the industry because it floats with them. So, we're not squeezing anyone's margins, but we're capturing what we believe to be our premiumization in those prices. And that's how we would like to stay throughout the year.

I'd say, Mac, I think the last thing, right, it's a little switch, right? April was locked in firm price. May, we have the firm 9% lock. But on the floating, look, we're fairly confident we're towards the bottom end of the cycle here on price. So, we want to retain some of the optionality of that as the cycle improves over time. And so, locking the commitment on the 9%, but keeping some optionality on the cycle, and that's, we're a low-cost producer, and you're investing in a lithium company. We want to give everybody and everybody should have the economics on the upside. So that's all.

Exactly. This is essentially the core building the customer partnership, which, again, you look at the copper concentrate industry, the iron ore industry, that's how this industry has evolved into the premium pricing. And so, we believe in partnership with our customers, and this is exactly what we're doing.

Thank you. Yes, Dennis, if you want to re-prompt, but otherwise, we can close it down.

[Operator Instructions]. And at this time, you may continue with closing remarks.

So, I'll just leave it there. Thank you, everyone, for joining our call. We look forward to updating you as shipments and the company progresses through our 2Q bill, and we look forward to reengaging on 2Q earnings. So, enjoy the rest of your day. Thank you.

Thank you. Thank you, everyone.