Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for holding. At this time, we would like to welcome everyone to CSN conference call to present results for the Q3 of 2023. Today with us, we have the Company’s executive officers. We would like to inform you that this event is being recorded, and all participants will be in listen-only mode during the Company presentation. Ensuing this, we will go on to the Q&A section, at which time further instructions will be provided. [Operator Instructions] We have simultaneous webcast that may be accessed through CSN's Investor Relations website at ri.csn.com.br, where the presentation is also available. There will be a replay service for this call on the website for a period of one week. The slide presentation may be downloaded at this website. Before proceeding, please be advised that some of the statements herein are mere expectations or trends and are based on the current assumptions and opinions of the Company management and the performance and events may differ materially from those expressed herein, which do not constitute projection. In fact, actual results, performances, or events may differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements as a result of several factors, overall and economic conditions in Brazil and other countries, interest rates and exchange rate levels, future rescheduling or prepayment of debt nominated in foreign currencies, protectionist measurements in the U.S., Brazil, and other countries, changes in law and regulations and general competitive factors at a global, regional, or national basis. We will now turn the floor over to Mr. Marcelo Cunha Ribeiro, the CFO and Investor Relations Officer, who will present the highlights of CSN for the period. You may proceed, Mr. Ribeiro.

A good day to all of you and thank you for participating at the CSN call. First of all, we will go on with the presentation and then give the floor to Mr. Benjamin Steinbruch, the Chairman of the Board. We begin with the highlights of the period. Referring to a soul thing of CSN of its business model, which is its diversification, and this quarter, it became very important allowed for a robust growth of our [capital] (ph) of 25% despite a pressure on the scenario of the steel companies worldwide. We were able to increase our profitability and increase cash generation that reach more than [R$1 billion]. This led to deleveraging and reduction of our agenda. These are the highlights we will discuss during the presentation. We go on to the next slide showing you the sequential evolution of our EBITDA. And you can see the enhancements of this quarter 25% improvement. And on the other hand, we see that we are still in a semester of transition. There's more to improve to enhance especially in the steel segment that this quarter felt the pressure of imported steel in unfair conditions, because of the global price and impacting the domestic market. The EBITDA had a drop of 64% offset with a positive evolution in all of the other businesses with the highlight of mining more than 76%, where we also see an excellent advance in our logistics center and our cement sector that has the best EBITDA in its history. We reached R$2.8 billion with over R$552 million sequentially. Now we continue on. We go on to operating and financial indicators. Here you see CapEx with evolution of 20% already expected as part of our annual evolution. R$304 million high and steel because of important projects, especially the…

Good morning, everybody, and thank you for allowing me to be here. I would like to share the highlights for the quarter. As you know we have had very specific guidance in terms of our indicators, our qualitative indicators and our performance in terms of ESG. The main highlight for the period and this was mentioned in the CMIN call, is the completion of the stability of our town and the conclusion of the de-characterization of civil works for the [indiscernible]. Now we will undergo a two year monitoring, and of course, we have made great price on this. We're also evolving in terms of our operational management. We ended in terms of health and safety at the lowest accident rate, 13% better than it was last year even express a reduction in terms of our accident severity rate and 44% in the number of loss is due to accidents involving our own employees. Now, we have figures that have been incorporated into all of our operations and we have an accumulated reduction of 7% in our figures vis-a-vis last year, in environmental management, you will see the excessive reduction in the use of water. We had a great deal of rainfall and we had a minus 19% in water consumption for the CSN group compared to the nine months of 2022. Now we were able to generate 1.2 gigawatts of our own energy. I would like to very quickly refer to the part of diversity that continues to grow. The women's representation now reaches 15%, an increase compared to last year. And we continue to comply with our goal of 28% in 2025 and you will see the constant evolution of the Company in terms of [MCI] (ph). Now we had the first operation of a sustainable linked finance of BRL500 million with Bank of Brazil for cement. And finally, the publication of our first Climate Action Report, it's a document that we'll include all of the details in terms of our de-carbonization, and you will be able to see this at Investors Day, and it will also be published in the site. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Helena Guerra for the highlights. With this, we would like to end the presentation and open the floor for questions and answers. I give the floor to Benjamin Steinbruch, the CEO, for his comments.

Good morning, everybody. It's always very satisfying to speak to you after the presentation of the results for the third quarter. I'm very quickly going to make some remarks on the sector. We begin with mining that was presented in the morning. We had a record of production. The prices aligned with the market, very good prices that we found to be somewhat surprising and they ended up being higher than we expected, control costs, this was a very good quarter. And the last quarter well the price is given of [$130] (ph) per ton. This is the market price which will certainly enable us to have a solution in this segment in the fourth quarter. We'll continue on what happened in the third quarter in terms of the improvements in the amount and the prices that have already been established. And of course, we're going to continue on with enhancements in terms of mining. When it comes to cement, we had a growth, although the market has become ever more difficult, we believe that the market for the fourth quarter will continue to grow as part of what has been foreseen. We're in mid-November already, and we do believe this will be a good quarter with a price recovery and with higher consumption of cement. As you will know, since the beginning of the year, we have been working arduously be in terms of maintenance. We have problems as you know, in the last quarter of last year in terms of our steel mill and we're working arduously on processes that are quite lengthy. We're beginning to see the initial results. And after the work in all of the quarters of this year, I believe that we have finally returned to a situation of normalcy. With this, our production…

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you. We will now go on to the question-and-answer session for investors and analyst. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Caio Greiner from BTG Pactual. Caio, you may proceed. Caio, your line has been unmuted. You can post your question. Our next question comes from Guilherme Rosito from Bank of America. Guilherme, you may proceed.

Good morning, everybody. My first question to Marcelo refers to capital allocation. It usually is very expressive at CSN, but we see that CSN is inventing in very relevant things. Now you have increased your buyback and in which operations will the company allocate capital and continue to pay very good dividends. My next question is to Martinez. If you could comment on price and distribution and what is happening in terms of negotiations to increase the rates of steel? Will this apply to the rate for all products?

Guilherme, thank you for the several questions. This discussion of dividends and buybacks, I don't think this has a black and white answer. We have seen our own preference that is to work with buyback to recover the price of a share. The effects are rather transitory and what happens deep down is to pay the shareholders. So we believe that this is a policy that can work better instead of using these buybacks that is quite discretionary and not very foreseeable. And we have mentioned this in some of our investor days. We would like to pay higher dividends to pay the investors but within a certain logic. And this is what we have done with the dividends that have just been announced of R$2.5 billion and the buyback alternative is there, but for us, we prefer to maintain consistency during the quarter. I will give the floor to Martinez.

Guilherme, I understood the first part of your question referring to price and distribution. The scenario that we're working with for the fourth quarter is of stable demand until the end of the year at stable prices. This is a scenario we're counting on in terms of parity. Nowadays, we imagine a BQ in China of $533, $540. We sometimes reach $550 and in the domestic market, the variation will be R$3900, R$4000, I will represent 15%. So there's no reason, therefore, to try to work on recovering prices what we have to do is sell the product. There's still a great deal of imported material in the market as Benjamin has just remarked, this is an unfair, unloyal, and a normal situation comes with peaks of 25%. So the trend until the end of the year is to have a drop in the imports. This is the scenario that we're faced with until the end of the year. I'm sorry I was not able to understand the second part of your question.

If you could give us more color on your negotiations to increase rates and if these rates will apply to everybody in terms of steel.

Well, when we think about an increase of rate, I don't have an update on what is happening as Benjamin mentioned, we're working in all front. We're specifically involved in negotiations with all of the government stakeholders, which in one way or another have influence in this process. What is more important is what Benjamin mentioned, you don't need science or technology for this, simply copy what is being done abroad. We live in decarbonize a globalized world. And what we need is a minimum of protection at present. The U.S. at present, we clearly perceive that they are fully protected with their anti-dumping 308 rate Europe. They worked with anti-dumping, and now they have safeguards implemented. So, Brazil is standing on the outskirts of the world. This situation is ridiculous what is happening in Brazil that the industry participates with 11% of the GDP. What we truly expect is for the government to do its job and to increase these rates to a minimum of 25%, which is what we're claiming for, and even that way for many projects, if we take away the shipment price, we will still have difficulties from the plant inwards, everybody is competitive besides the Brazil cost that still exist. We face difficulties as Benjamin mentioned, and in the case of CSN specifically. What we have done is heroic in truth, and forgive me for the word with a drop of 5% in price. We're fighting against the imports with unloyal competition with products that do not comply with specifications in enormous amounts. I think the drop was small. We have been struggling strongly against this material coming in to Brazil. And CSN is directly involved to give you an idea, Guilherme, of the imported material coming into Brazil 63% impacts CSN. It doesn't impact other market players. So, those who are bearing the brunt, our CSN in terms of pre-painted material, the galvanized material, the tin plate. If you look at the drop of 5% in maintaining volume, this is quite positive considering what we're facing. We're working like crazy. We're changing our portfolio products, thickness, clients, and amount to be able to exist, otherwise, the drop would be much greater in galvanized materially by seek of a premium of 15% in 3Q. It reaches twenty 7% premium in the imported nationalized product. Luckily enough, we still have a group of clients and a service portfolio that enables us to distinguish ourselves and make our package irresistible to the client. This is a more complete package and justifies what we presented in the results.

And more question for Martinez, the NAV discount?

There are two relevant actions that we're adopting to reduce this. We look at the value of the assets in CSN. The example of [CMIN] (ph) is very clear. It has been appreciated in a rather expressive way with a stable value, and we have carried out some actions at CSN, and we're doing the same with our cement units to unharness this value. Now this is part of our plans, and we hope to do this when the capital market is stronger in 2024. And secondly, we have to reduce our leverage. The leverage, of course, brings about concern of CSN compared to CMIN and the relative performance of their shares. A reduction of leverage will enable plus to materialize at NAV.

That was very clear. Thank you very much.

Our next question comes from Caio Greiner from BTG Pactual. You may proceed, Caio.

Good afternoon to everybody, and I do apologize, I had to disconnect. Only two questions here. I would like to further explore the margins in steel. And if we look at what is happening, you had a drop in slabs of 13%. But in terms of tonnage, the drop was minimal. And this is reflected in the cost. I would like to understand how you view the margin of this new plant in the evolution in the coming quarters, if we'll see the impact already benefiting the margins this next quarter and in 2024. Now if we do assume that we're in a highly binary scenario, what will happen with stable prices and what will happen in 2024, so, if you could help us set up that equation of the margins for the steel plant for 2024? The second question, I would like to explore your leverage guidance. And where do you foresee achieving these reductions until the end of 2024 to below two times?

When we carry out our accounts we see the EBITDA for 2024 being very similar to that of 2023 and the same holds through to cash generation with the same levels of appetite amortization for the payment of energy and the payment of minimum dividend. You wouldn't have a great deal of cash for deleveraging, perhaps we're working with the wrong premises or assumptions. And that is where the reduction in leverage would come, or if you're thinking of other variables in terms of cash or the sale of assets.

Once again, we would like to gain a better understanding of those two points. Thank you very much.

Thank you. I have very good questions, for the margins of the steel plant, they still have that internal effect is not only cost and price, but also the share of our business in Germany. The share in Germany was generating a two digit margins because of the situation in Europe, the positive situation and the spreads. And there was a normalization, a very rapid normalization between the second and third quarters. The markets went back to a situation of normalcy and seasonality in Germany is in July, August, and September. So, when we compare the second and third quarters, there's a negative contribution of Germany that is significant and it's difficult to compare this with price and cost domestically. The good news is that the volumes in Germany are growing once again. Prices are stable. Scrap, we also see a reduction. So, it's become interesting in Germany. And the situation here, which is more relevant, is one of price stability, and that range will help us a more positive performance of production, the fixed cost. This happened at the end of the quarter, closer to September and because of this, the cost of production is filling the inventory and this will translate into cost of merchandise sold. And while the third quarter, the margin will be very positive in the fourth quarter, and we're going to seek that double-digit in the coming quarters. Regarding our outlook for margin, that is it. Now your question on deleveraging is very pertinent. It's a difficult thing to do. It includes uncertain premises for example the cost of iron ore the coming year. But you're right there is no consensus. We are going to fix to be below two times with the risk capital of the group. We have been very vocal about this. We have cement. We're going to it's a partner in terms of energy, and this is how we're going to make sure that our accounts are correct. Now we are working with a future and this is what we believe will happen in 2024.

Thank you Marcelo that was very clear. Thank you very much.

Our next question comes from [Ricardo Monigail from Safra Bank] (ph). You may proceed, Ricardo.

Good morning, everybody. Congratulations for your results. I don't want to be too insistent on steel in Brazil, but I'm trying to understand the carryover of the steel price in the last month. Well, the price of steel in the last month in the past and how this compares with the averages in the past. And if you could give us an outlook of what happened in October November already, which will be the evolution in the fourth quarter? The second question is about the results in cement. How much of the increase in profitability is due to synergy and which is the mix that you expect -- and without expecting a higher growth, your base case I believe is 3%.

Ricardo, when it comes to price, as I mentioned formerly. There is no carryover. We're working with a situation of price stability for the fourth quarter. Now eventually, of course, we may have a slight variation because of the mix of products, but there will be no significant variation in terms of price. This is [indiscernible] Ricardo about Cement. Basically, we already have a very positive evolution in terms of the synergies. We have already remarked this in another column. We after the LafargeHolcim operation, we were able to foresee even better opportunity, and we're evolving in all the possible fronts for synergy. Now these synergies are incorporated in the results of the Company through time. And we see an evolution and incorporation in the third quarter. Benjamin and Marcelo himself mentioned that cement in the last few months, in the last quarters, well, had to face a more difficult market. And we see a price recovery in the last quarter and we hope there will be a recovery in coming quarters and we will see a more vigorous evolution of synergy regarding the margins that we expect. We had margins of 30% in cement. Now with the incorporation of LafargeHolcim, these margins dropped immediately because Holcim was working with a 20% margin. But once again, by incorporating these synergies in the coming quarters, we will be seeing a normal recovery, unexpected recovery with a potential of having margins greater than we are quoting here. Thank you.

Thank you. Thank you very much.

Our next question comes from Daniel Sasson from Itau BBA. Daniel, you may continue with your question.

Hello and good afternoon to everybody. My first question is perhaps to Martinez or Marcelo. You remarked that in terms of costs, the benefits of that reduction in the cost of slab will be become more visible beginning in the Q4. I would like to understand if in the cost of production of slab that already had a good drop, there is still room for further reduction. And we spoke about the price of BRL4000 per ton in steel and this expense has extremely contracted margin for the quarter. My second question to insist further on the previous question of cement. It is although, it is clear that the capture of synergies becoming ever more evident as a margin recovery, the EBITDA going to 23% margin. Now going forward, do you still detect opportunities to grow through M&As in the sector? Is this still a route that you can explore? Or do you believe that as of now, the restrictions of the antitrust agencies couldn't make negotiations more difficult, simply to see which is your outlook for the next steps after the capture of energy and the growth of the business. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Sasson, for the questions. Regarding the cost, yes, there is room for further drops, in truth, it has been reduced more. If we look at October, we see the price lower than those [3,400, 3,500] (ph), and there have been some movements in raw materials that might make it more difficult to have subsequent troughs. We've seen what is happening with coal, iron ore and others. But yes, the cost will continue to drop and aid in a bit our margins. Now regarding cement and the consolidation, the cement sector in Brazil continues to be fragmented compare it to other large and more mature markets. And therefore, we can't put aside the new opportunities may come about, at the top of the ranking, at the bottom of the ranking. We believe that all of these opportunities, of course, would be worthwhile looking at if there will be limitations because of the law of competition, that doesn't refer only to cement. We know how this logic operates. In the discussion with CADE, the antitrust agency, we had long discussions during LafargeHolcim. So, it depends on the regions where we would like to implement new opportunities for growth and inorganic growth.

Well, thank you very much, Marcelo.

[Operator Instructions] As we have no further questions, we would like to end the question-and-answer session. We will return the floor to Mr. Marcelo Cunha Ribeiro, CFO and IRO, for his closing remarks.

I would like to thank all of you once again for your attendance, for your questions. And of course, before closing, I underscore our conviction that we're on the path to recover our results so can have even more positive results. I do invite you to the CSN CMIN day that will happen in a month. You will, of course, receive a same day message so that you can follow-up on this. Once again, thank you, and have a very good day.

The CSN conference call ends here. You can now disconnect and have a very good day. Thank you for using chorus call.