Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Signet Jewelers Fiscal 2016 Third Quarter Financial Results Call and Webcast. During the call, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. After the presentation, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this call is being recorded today, November 24, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time. I would now like to turn the meeting over to your host for today’s call, James Grant, VP of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, James.

Good morning and welcome to our third quarter fiscal 2016 earnings call. On the call today are Mark Light, CEO and Michele Santana, CFO. The presentation deck we will be referencing is available under the Investors section of our website, signetjewelers.com. During today’s presentation, we will in places discuss Signet’s business outlook and make certain forward-looking statements. Any statements that are not historical facts are subject to a number for risks and uncertainties and actual results may differ materially. We urge you to read the risk factors, cautionary language and other disclosures in the Annual Report on Form 10-K that was filed on March 26 with the SEC. We also draw your attention to Slide #2 in today’s presentation for additional information about forward-looking statements and non-GAAP measures. I will now turn the call over to Mark.

Thanks, James and good morning everyone. In the third quarter, Signet comps and total sales both increased by 3.3%. Adjusted EPS was at $0.33 a share, a 57.1% increase over the prior year’s adjusted EPS. There are four key messages that I want you to take away from our results and our guidance. First, in what has been a choppy retail environment for most, we were able to deliver same-store sales growth in line with our guidance. Our total sales increase, which came from all selling channels were driven primarily by branded bridal sales across all of our store banners as well as strong growth overall from Kay Jewelers, Ernest Jones and Piercing Pagoda. We also continued to outperform our industry according to the latest U.S. government and British Retail Consortium data. This was driven by a multitude of strength that separate us from our competition such as advertising, driving jewelry trends, branding and much more. Second, we made significant investments in store operations, systems and training during the third quarter in order to be in the best possible position for the fourth quarter and those investments are starting to payoff. While our sales results in the aggregate were in line with our expectations, we saw some softness at Jared and Zales. This was a result of very specific systems investments, personnel changes and training that we implemented in the quarter. I will elaborate on these changes later in the call, but suffice it to say that this was a lot of change to implement in a short period of time. We thought it was appropriate to push through these changes and investment in our smallest quarter in order to prepare us for our biggest quarter and into the future. The third point I want you to take away is…

Thank you, Mark and good morning everyone. Alright. So let’s begin with our third quarter sales performance. Signet’s total sales and comps each increased 3.3% and on a constant exchange basis, total sales increased 4.9%. Let me add some additional color on our total sales and comp performance by division. Starting with our Sterling division, total sales increased 5.9% to $733.5 million, which included a comp increase of 3.5%. Sales increased primarily due to branded bridal and select diamond jewelry, most notably at Kay. This was partially offset by a comp decline at Jared. The average transaction price in Sterling increased by 3% and the number of transactions decreased by 0.7% due to merchandise mixed shift in favor of branded bridal. Our Zale division Q3 total sales decreased by 0.5%, but increased 2.4% on a constant exchange basis. Total sales were $329.9 million including a same-store sales increase of 2.6%. The average transaction price and number of transactions both increased 1%. The Zales jewelry operating segment saw higher transaction growth at 2.9% and a decrease in average transaction value of 1.9% as we improved sales productivity in fashion jewelry. Piercing Pagoda sales were driven by an 11.6% increase in average transaction value, while transaction count remained flat. The higher average transaction value was primarily due to higher gold sales. Now in our UK division, total sales decreased 1.1% but increased 4.9% on a constant exchange basis. Total sales were $149.4 million, with a comp sales increase of 4.1%, driven primarily by diamond jewelry and watches, most notably at Ernest Jones. The average transaction price increased 3.4% and the number of transactions increased by 2.3%. Now moving on from sales, let’s walk through Signet’s consolidated Q3 performance and then we will turn and analyze Signet’s adjusted results. So on Slide 9,…

Thank you, Michele. So to sum up, we had a good quarter. We had our biggest product launch, which is exceeding our expectations. And we made some smart strategic investments and those investments are starting to pay off in time for our most important quarter. Finally, I sincerely want to congratulate and thank all Signet team members. We believe we are very well positioned for a profitable long-term growth as a direct result of the passion and dedication of the Signet team. And with that, we will now take your questions.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Lorraine Hutchinson with Bank of America. Your line is open.

Hi, guys. This is Stephen Albert on for Lorraine. I guess first question would just be the increase in the bad debt expense that’s due solely to a mix shift and you are not seeing any deterioration in any of your credit metrics, correct?

That’s absolutely correct. And let me just add a little bit more color. Again just to start with, every credit decision we made is done on a very thorough analysis using those predictive and statistical analysis to drive those decisions. And again, we said this before, credit really is a competitive advantage to us that enables our sales and drives a higher customer lifetime value than a non-customer – non-credit customer. And so really what we saw in Q3 and I would just draw an analogy to merchandise mix, where product changes might affect rate, but profit is still flowing through the bottom line. So, when you think about our Q3 which is really our smallest quarter and that our credit earnings are more evenly spread throughout the year, it just has a more profound impact on our Q3. So really, that increase is driven by this mix shift that we saw in Q3 we equated it to about $0.04 per share and our credit portfolio continues to operate profitably. It is stable and continues to perform strong and well within our expectations based on this mix shift.

Great. And then I guess a quick follow-up on the average transaction price decline at Zales that also you seem to indicate that was a mix shift towards fashion jewelry. You haven’t made any sort of pricing investments at Zales that have driven that either, correct?

No, that’s absolutely correct. And that again this is part of our strategic objectives when we look at the Zales. Zales has always done well within the bridal category. And particularly as you moved into the holiday, the Q3 holiday seasons, where they haven’t performed as well as in fashion jewelry. And so that’s been a key area that we have looked to drive. Particularly, we talked about our Unstoppable Love fashion jewelry before the shimmering diamond, which has been a tremendous success for us at Zale. So when you see that ATV change, it really is merchandise mix driving from that bridal to our fashion jewelry.

Alright. Thank you, guys.

You are welcome.

Your next question comes from the line of Oliver Chen with Cowen. Your line is open.

Hi, thank you. We just had a question regarding the Jared comp store sales and looking forward, which comp lever do you think has the most opportunity? And also, Mark, can you elaborate on your earlier comments about some of the transitions regarding the training program and how that will manifest mix, it sounds like you are in really good shape for fourth quarter? Thank you.

Hi, Albert. Thank you. Yes, we do believe we are in very good position in the fourth quarter. And I just want to ground everybody listening on the call that traditionally to serve in the jewelry industry, we take the third quarter as an important quarter for us to train our people, prepare them for all the new initiatives and get them ready for the fourth quarter and the third quarter is our smallest quarter. In Jared, they had more going on than usual, because we were focused on a lot of different areas of business that we are trying to enhance and a lot of it came from our customer segmentation study that we did with Bain to get a better understanding of that Jared customer that settlement of this customer to make sure we are interacting with them the appropriate way what they are expecting. So, some of the things that we did in the third quarter one is we had a major leadership conference, where we get all of our managers and get them trained and ready. And then our Jared team had to focus on some more specific areas, because we are changing our selling process and techniques. And quite frankly, the third quarter is the time when we make sure that we have all the right team members, both from a managerial perspective and on the sales floor, that we have the right team members in place that are ready and prepared to execute our new selling techniques that correlate with our new – our Bain segmentation study. So we have made some changes. We have made some changes in the stores and made it – because we have some team members that weren’t there and weren’t ready. So we made some good personnel changes…

And I would just add to it Oliver, in terms of the comp sales. Again, all of the initiatives that Mark has just talked to, we really believe will drive both the transaction and the ATV from a comp sales standpoint.

Okay, that’s really, really helpful for our models. And regarding the portfolio at large, how are you dealing about the price points in terms of the balance of entry price points versus more elevated, I know it seem like an opportunity this year versus last year, I was curious about that from a product and how you allocate the marketing dollars?

Yes. We feel better this year than last year, Oliver. We do have a lot of new exciting initiatives at lower price points, whether it would be the Star Wars beads and jewelry collection and in case, our Miracle Links collection in Kay’s and at Jared at – in the Zale division, we have more Persona beads. We actually have an exciting new launch with the Snoopy – new Snoopy film, Peanuts – excuse me Peanuts film that’s just coming out now. So we have a good mix of fashion products at lower price points and we have some the new launches and new initiatives and a little bit higher films is doing very well such as Ever Us, which is really doing well for us. So we feel a lot better about the mix of price points that we have available for our customers this year as compared to last year.

Okay. And just a final question is in light of the tragic global events in Europe is that a factor where your customer has an added degree of volatility or are you different just because of your bridal and your domestic exposure?

I mean I don’t think we are different. I mean obviously, with these tragic events that happened around the world has everybody concerned. And we have a benefit because our product is a more preconceived purchase than that of other retail products, but we need customers being feeling secure and feeling good about that there is their security when they go shopping. That being said, we have a lot of let’s just say, promotional opportunities in our toolkit. And that we really have a good understanding, we have tested over the year a lot of different elastic type of opportunities to promote if and when needed as continue to see if things get a little bit more challenging. But it’s important to note that we don’t have the big tourism factor that other businesses have and that we see as benefit to us.

Thank you. Happy holidays and best regards.

Thank you, Oliver.

Your next question comes from the line of Annie Samuel with JPMorgan. Your line is open.

Hi guys. Thanks for taking the question. You spoke to a strong start of the quarter in November, particularly at Zale and Jared, given Jared was a little softer this quarter, can you speak to maybe what incremental is improved in November to-date. And then also across the chain any November standouts?

Sure, Annie no problem. Yes. Jared, it goes back to kind of our prepared statement. Jared has a lot of going forward. And that again, we have made so changes to the team members working in the stores of making sure everybody was in unison and understood the new way of selling to our Jared clients. We have the benefit of Vera Wang Love rolling into all of Jared stores was tested very well, so it’s an incremental bridal option for them. We have Miracle Links in those stores, which is a new program for the birth of a child, which is a little lower price points that we are happy with. And also we have a great partnership with Pandora and you will see some new Pandora ads and we are partnered with Pandora and Starting to sell Pandora jewelry and pushing that opportunity even further and taking that to next level. And you will see the TV ad this fall actually with Pandora with the beautiful Pandora ring that will be on. So Jared is ready for a good fourth quarter, there is a lot of incremental initiatives and product launches. And again, they have increased TV marketing spend year-on-year and they new creative, which we believe is getting better reaction from our customers than last year.

Great. Thanks so much. And then you guys spoke to a choppy retail environment, given expectations for a choppy and promotional landscape kind of across retail this holiday period, can you speak to your stance on promotions, how you plan to position yourself competitively?

Yes. Well, first of all we start off with that we have unique exclusive brands, which aren’t offered by our competitors, whether it would be Ever Us or it would be Vera Wang Love or it would Neil Lane or it’s the Open Hearts by Jane Seymour and there is a lot more that we have. So just by having brands that are only available to us and they cannot be discounted by our competitors is a huge benefit to was. That being said, as I shared with Oliver, we always have a toolkit. We are continually testing opportunities for different type of promotions and understand the elasticity of those promotions. So we have a toolkit of promotions that we know or at least we understand the lift that we can get from sales and incremental gross margin dollars if the market gets a little bit more competitive, we will determine if and when it’s appropriate to use one of those promotions that we have in our toolkit.

Great. Thanks so much.

Thank you. Have a good holiday.

Your next question comes from the line of Simeon Siegel with Nomura Securities. Your line is open.

Thanks. Hey guys, good morning.

Good morning Simeon.

Good morning.

So I know you don’t normally give it, but just given the planned acceleration in guidance, can you quantify the November improvements you are seeing at Jared sales at all, I mean any color on the current trends by concept. And then just can you talk about the margin puts and takes at Sterling, what they look going forward a little bit, any help Michele you can give on how we should think about that sales mix shift impact on credit, commodity benefits, I guess general merch margin, full price of our commercial selling, etcetera, kind of anything along there would be helpful? Thanks.

Sure. So let me start with – Simeon, as you know we are not going to quantify our results to-date other than the commentary that Mark and I have already shared out. We are seeing we are off to a strong start, which is factored into our guidance, particularly at Jared and Zale. So we feel very confident and good with the accelerated guidance that we have given up 3.5% to 5% comp sales. In terms of the margins again and I say this every quarter. We are not going to guide on particular gross margins, but try and give you some additional color to help with your model. On the Sterling side, we would expect that we will continue to see benefits related to lower gold costs. We did see benefits in the quarter related to that and that was as I said in the prepared remarks, entirely offset by this mix shift that we saw in Q3. So as we think about the Q4, what I would expect is still to see benefits flowing through on the gold side on our commodity side. A little bit of headwind I would imagine, coming through on this credit mix shift. It’s something that we will work through, but given the size of the Q4, that will be definitely less pronounced. And so I would expect that we will see the expansion.

Great. Thanks. And then if I can just ask one more, so it looks like you got leverage this quarter, which I don’t know if it’s just a simple of your lapping four quarter of Zales, but can you just talk to anything that might be going on there, because just given all the color about the initiatives that are going on, which makes complete sense to use this Q3 for the kind of get ready quarter. I just would assume that we would have deleverage, so is there anything going on there or you found some savings or opportunities that we should think about?

Yes. I think part of it is really just that we have kind of have fully lapped the Zale acquisition. And particularly SG&A, as we talked about we are making significant investments on the Zale division and we know that there is a lag between when we are making those investments and when we are seeing the lift coming through on our sales and our gross margin side. So I think it was more so due to the fact that we have lapped the quarter, but there have some targeted cost savings reductions that we have been looking across the business to help from a leverage standpoint. As we move forward, the investments will continue to be there. Again, we will have a little bit of this lag effect when you look at your sales and gross margins in the way those are flowing through. Importantly, though, what I would say and what we are really pleased when we think about the Q3 is we did realize net synergies in the third quarter. And Mark and I both talked about our operating margin expansion of 90 basis points in Q3 that was in part driven by the modest net synergies that we realized during Q3. And those synergies primarily are coming from our sales and our gross margin. And again, they are partially being offset by the investments that we are making within our SG&A.

Perfect. Thanks a lot, guys and best of luck for holiday.

Thanks, Simeon.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Scott Krasik with Buckingham Research. Your line is open.

Yes. Hi, everyone. Thanks for taking my questions.

Sure.

I jumped on the call a little bit late. Did you quantify what the contribution from the change in the accounting for the extended service plan was to comp and EPS this quarter and then just maybe reaffirm what you think it will be for 4Q and maybe 1Q?

Sure. So in – for Q3, the change in our extended service plan and again just the operational change we had made related to that had an impact of 40 basis points on our comp sales at Signet and had a $0.03 impact to our earnings per share. As we look into Q4, previously what we said and this continues to be the case is that we would anticipate about a $0.07 impact on earnings per share. And then from a comp standpoint, it’s just factored into our comps. If you kind of go back between Q2, I believe there was a 60 basis point impact, 40 basis point impact in Q3 you can kind of do the math and come up with an estimate on the comps. And at this point, we haven’t quantified the impact going forward after our fourth quarter.

Okay. That’s fine. Thank you. And then just – can you just remind us what percentage again of the synergies you expect to achieve in fiscal ‘17? And I know it’s early, but does it seem like you are on plan, is there a high degree of confidence? Some people are complaining that you are not accelerating the synergy now, but we are just really hitting the first quarter. So, I just want to keep people’s expectations in check.

No, I appreciate that. We are extremely confident in our ability to achieve our synergies of the $150 million to $175 million by the end of FY ‘18 as well as the original targets on how the synergies should flow. And that was again 20% this year, which equates to about $30 million to $35 million. What we realized in Q3 was really on track with what we are expecting to see. The remainder will flow through in our Q4. When you go to FY ‘17, it’s an incremental 40% or said differently, we should realize a total of 60% of our net synergies by the end of FY ‘17. And again, we remain highly confident with those targets and those goals and everything that we are seeing to-date just reinforces that level of confidence.

That’s awesome. And then just last, you were going to be a secondary lender or make Zales credit file, how did that play out in 3Q?

So, in our Q3 which was primarily our test period in October, we started testing to our select Zale U.S. stores, very successful tests. So that was fully rolled out for the holiday season to all of our Zale U.S. stores. We are seeing great results. And so there will be more to come during our fourth quarter call related to that program.

Okay, good luck. Thanks.

Thank you. Appreciate it.

Your next question comes from the line of Brian Tunick with Royal Bank of Canada. Your line is open.

Thanks. Good morning, guys. I guess a couple of questions. On the Ever Us rollout, I guess first off, can you give us some idea of what kind of contribution can one product category have for the quarter and when do we see a bigger rollout of SKUs or marketing spend just curious? And should we assume it’s the Kay division primarily that should see that kind of benefit? And then the second question on the capital allocation side, I think you mentioned how much stock is left under the current program. You mentioned CapEx coming down this year, but should we expect some of that CapEx dollars got deferred into next year and just give us a thought on the capital allocation and share buyback viewpoint maybe for next year? Thanks very much.

Sure, Brian. I will take the Ever Us question and Michele will do the capital allocation. As it relates to Ever Us, the contribution we don’t share that information with you or anybody outside of internal of our company. But I will tell you that it is the as of yet and as early, we have a lot of business to do yet, but as of yet, we are projecting to be the biggest rollout we have had of any new program in the history of our company. And I am talking even if you pull out Zales. So, it’s a very, very strong rollout for us, but we do not give specific contributions. The company will tell you though that historically when we have an exciting program like this, it really does excite the store teams and the customers. So, it puts a good emphasis on the business let’s just say that. As far as the rollout where we are going next is we will start testing different items, whether it be in the earring category or the necklace category or different ring styles, we will be starting testing in the first quarter and the second quarter of this year with the hopes of finding a winner being able to extended out into all of our brands into the fall season of next year, a year from now. And it’s not Kay division primarily this is all of our brands. It’s in Kay, it’s in Zales, it’s in Peoples in Canada, it’s in Ernest Jones and H.Samuel in the United Kingdom, it is in Jared. So, this is not Kay only. This is a brand and an offering that crosses over all of our customer segments and it’s working well in all of our brands and all of the countries of which we operate.

Yes, in terms of – I will pickup on the capital allocation side. As you heard in their prepared remarks, we have repurchased 112 million of our shares to-date. The guidance we had provided was 100 million to 150 million of a share buyback as it relates to FY ‘16, and that was really on the heels of our capital allocation policy that we had unveiled last March with one of those tenants being that we would return 70% to 80% of our free cash flow to shareholders either in the form of dividends and/or share repurchases, again always subject to any strategic initiative that will come along. So, we really have met that guidance. We anticipate in the fourth quarter that we will continue to purchase our shares. We have currently 154 million that remains under that authorized program. So, I think you need to stay tuned and you will be hearing more on our fourth quarter call as it relates to our capital allocation plans moving into FY ‘17 and what that means. From a CapEx standpoint, you are right, a number of these – we reduced that guidance from what we originally had. We are at $275 million to $325 million previously and that has now $260 million to $280 million primarily driven by timing. So, we would expect a number of these products, particularly as it relates to IT will be moved over to FY ‘17 and we would expect to see elevated levels of capital expenditure for FY ‘17 given the amount of initiatives we have in place, particularly as it relates to IT. And so we will give you an updated capital expenditure guidance when we close out the year in our fourth quarter.

And if I could just throw in one last one. So, the Zale comp looked a little light for the third quarter. Was it a lot of what you said around Jared and the training? I mean, you are calling it out that it’s strong here in the fourth quarter. Can you maybe just talk about what learnings you had in the third quarter on the Zale business and how it came in versus your expectations?

Yes, Brian. As you stated, Zales trend run-rate was a little lower than it was in the first and second quarter. Of course, we weren’t satisfied with that, but we understood why. And some of the reasons why and it’s even more emphasized in Zales than it was in Jared and in our main baseline of stores. There is a lot going on in Zales. We have a lot of training going on. We have some training whether it be on our new discount controls. We have a new repair information system that we have started to train our people on. We have a new custom system we are training our people on. We have labor scheduling that’s new for Zales. We have compensation changes that we made with Zales. We actually even have different price tagging and we have a new test management system in place. And compounded on all of that, we also have new products that we are launching. So Zales, it’s a lot for those stores to take on, but because we have to add the experience in a lot of these systems and trainings that we have done in our U.S. Signet business from the past, we knew we can make it happen, but it was a lot of take on. So that being said, it was constantly done in the third quarter and we feel very good about the position that Zales is in the fourth quarter. And as we stated, they are starting off just very well so far, very good so far going into the fourth. So, we believe we made the right decision on getting our people trained up in the smallest quarter of the year to get the Zales team members right into the fourth quarter and so far so good.

Super. That’s very helpful. Thanks our much. Good luck for the holiday, guys.

Thank you, Brian.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Lindsay Drucker-Mann with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Thanks. Good morning everyone.

Good morning.

Good morning.

I wanted to ask about traffic, could you give us any insight into what your portfolio of stores are seeing as far as traffic goes maybe on versus off mall or across the different brands?

We really don’t share that kind of information Lindsay. I will tell you that, obviously we experienced the experience of the traffic dropping in the malls and in retail affects us, but we believe it doesn’t affect us as much as our other retail competitive set because again, we have a product that people are thinking about before they come into the stores and doing a lot of shopping online. So the traffic does affect us, but we believe we are a little insulated as it relates to other parts of the retail world. But again, we feel very good about the amount of advertising we have got this year, our new creative that we have this year, our new initiatives as it relates to selling and our new product launches that should hopefully increase the traffic into our stores for the fourth quarter.

Maybe asked a different way, to the degree that Jared and Zales slowed versus expectations sequentially, was that a traffic or conversion issue?

We believe it was a conversion issue more so than a traffic, obviously it’s a combination of both but we believe because of all of the training and all of the tactics we are working with our team members in Zale and Jared, there was more conversion in youth than it was a traffic issue.

Okay. Thanks. And then secondly, can you talk a little bit about your outlook for pricing on a like-for-like basis or excluding maybe mixing up to higher priced products, how you are thinking about that in the fourth quarter, I know you have talked about Jared’s first ever sale event. Zales had one more preferred customer event, but maybe offset by more promotional discounts in an industry that’s getting – seems to be getting a lot more promotional in jewelry into the fourth quarter, how you are thinking about that?

Yes. It’s a good question. First of all, I keep on always going back to one of the things that we have that kind of insulates us from promotion is our brands. And that our brands are not all for our competitive set, it’s things programs like Ever Us, and Vera Wang Love and Neil Lane that if customers are excited about those brands, they are not going to get anywhere else and so they are not going to get a discount. So it insulates us. That being said, you are right. We have increased the amount of promoting specifically in Jared because when we have learned more about the Jared customers through segmentation studies, there are sentimentalist customers they care about the product, they care about being engaged as it relates to when they are purchasing the products. But they still want to make sure that they are getting a value and they still want to make sure they have an opportunity for that value. So having a sale every once in a while and Jared like some other type of non-jewelry competitors to Jared, is very normal for them and we think we are actually out of sync by not having those sales for our sentimental customers. So you will see a little bit more promotions with Jared. As far as Zales goes and the rest of our brands, we are just targeting our promotions better. We are understood we have a promotional kind of treasure chest what we have for dollars there. And what we are doing better with Zales, we believe we are targeting those promotions better and that we are using those promotion dollars more succinctly and more effectively. So as far as the fourth quarter, are we promoting more as a whole, I would say no. But in the Jared business, we are being a little more thoughtful to do to that segmentations understanding of that customer is looking for some event sometimes.

Great. And then just last question, could you give us an update on what you are seeing in the diamond supply chain, whether it’s pricing of rough and polished stones and then also just generally, what you are seeing from liquidation of some of the middle men that compete in the diamond supply chain and how that industry is transitioning? Thanks.

Yes, it’s a good question Lindsay. There are some dynamic shifts happening in the diamond supply chain right now, specifically those of you have read De Beers had a very not a good second quarter, there has just been some writings in our industry about the last sites, meaning the last production or sale of goods coming out of their mines was substantially below the previous years. And it’s primarily coming from the lack of demand from the Far East and from the Middle Eastern part of the countries, who have a demand for primarily user demand of higher quality goods than we are using. So right now, there are opportunities to make buys in the rough market and potentially as polished market on the higher quality of diamond called the VS type of goods by GIA terminology. And that’s just not the goods that we use here at Signet, we are a house that uses I1s – heavy I1 and some SI2s. So the opportunities that are coming from the market right now are more in the higher quality because of the lack of demand from the Far East. It’s not something we are seeing now. Well, will there be opportunities in the future, can there be opportunities and supply chain opportunities for our company who has got a consistency of how we order our products, we will see and we are investigating those opportunities. But as of right now, those opportunities are really for better buys are really in the higher quality rough and polished diamonds that we don’t use at this point.

Great. Thanks so much.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Paul Lejuez with Citigroup. Your line is open.

Good morning.

Good morning.

Paul Lejuez, your line is open.

Okay. I think let’s take the next one please operator.

Your next question comes from the line of Bill Armstrong from CL King & Associates.

It’s actually Jennifer for Paul. Sorry about that, having some headset difficulties. First Michelle, I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about the kind of the third quarter EPS miss relative to guidance, was that due primarily to the investments at Zale and Jared or the increase in bad debt expense or both and then any commentary on the semi-annual sale that Jared?

Yes. Hi Jennifer, so let me start with your first question in terms of the guidance. The $0.33 was impacted and quantified in terms of the prepared remarks about the mix shift related to credit that we saw from Jared over to Kay. That equated to about $0.04 per share. So if you take your $0.33 and you add $0.04 that gives you a sense of where we would have been. And then as Mark had talked about just on some of the softness that we saw on Zale and Jared, driven by the intentional investments and our objective to use Q3 to really get prepared for the fourth quarter also have somewhat of an impact, but it was primarily we saw from this mix shift on the credit side of $0.04.

Okay, great. And then any commentary on the semi-annual sale at Jared and then kind of maybe a longer term picture, what are you seeing in terms of cannibalization any kind of now that you have had Zale for a year any new learnings there? Thanks.

Yes. As far as the Light Up the Holiday event, Jared did well. It did well as well enough we would tell you that we believe we are doing better in the fourth quarter, so it did well for us. We are happy with the results of the first event. And as far as the cannibalization effect, it’s minimal. We studied this over and over again. And just a little bit of data for you all, from our research, 65% or more customers that shop at Kay or shop at Zales have never stepped into a Kay or Zales stores. And we also track this weekly. We look at stores that have Kay and Zales in the mall versus stores that only have a Kay or Zale in the mall and we are seeing minimal cannibalization. And we believe the more we get involved in our segmented differences from Kay and Zales and Jared, the better it’s going to get, but we are seeing minimal cannibalization at this point.

Alright, great. Thanks and best of luck.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Our last question comes from the line of Bill Armstrong of CL King & Associates. Your line is open.

Good morning Mark and Michele. So just a couple of quick points of clarifications. You discussed the impact from the shift to Kay from Jared on bad debt expense, to what extent if any, was there an impact on merchandise margins from that mix shift?

In terms of merchandise mix, I would say there was probably a lesser impact as it relates to that sales shift from Jared over to Kay. It was just more pronounced from the credit shift moving over to the Kay customers.

Got it. And then on the ring sizing extended service plan change, just to clarify that was a favorable $0.03 impact for the quarter, correct?

That’s absolutely correct, Bill.

Okay. And will we see a favorable impact in Q4 as well?

That’s correct, it’s a favorable impact.

Thank you.

You’re welcome.

Thank you.

And we have no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back over to Mr. Light.

Thank you. And thank you all for taking part in this call. Our next scheduled call is on January 7 when we will be reviewing our holiday sales results. From all of us at Signet to all of you, have a very happy and healthy holiday season. And thanks again and goodbye.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today’s call, you may disconnect.