Good day, and welcome to the Silgan Holdings First Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the presentation over to Mr. Alex Hutter, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, and good morning. Joining me on the call today are Adam Greenlee, President and CEO; Bob Lewis, EVP, Corporate Development and Administration; and Kim Ulmer, SVP and CFO. Before we begin the call today, we would like to make it clear that certain statements made on this conference call may be forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made based upon management's expectations and beliefs concerning future events impacting the company and therefore, involve a number of uncertainties and risks, including, but not limited to, those described in the company's annual report on Form 10-K for 2023 and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Therefore, the actual results of operations or financial condition of the company could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. In addition, commentary on today's call may contain references to certain non-GAAP financial metrics, including adjusted EBIT, adjusted EBITDA, free cash flow and adjusted net income per diluted share. A reconciliation of these metrics, which should not be considered substitutes for similar GAAP metrics can be found in today's press release and under non-GAAP financial information available in the Investor Relations section of our website at silganholdings.com. With that, let me turn it over to Adam.

Great. Thank you, Alex. We'd like to welcome everyone to Silgan's First Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. We're off to a solid start in 2024, and our team delivered another quarter of strong financial performance while making progress towards our long-term strategic objectives and delivering on our multiyear cost improvement initiatives. We delivered first quarter adjusted EPS at the high end of the expected range, with strong operational and cost performance driving our results as the Silgan team remains focused on managing the items that are within our control. While volumes in the first quarter were mixed relative to our expectations entering the quarter. We continue to believe that the broad destocking trends we have been experiencing over the past year are coming to a conclusion during the first half of 2024, and are seeing positive trends early in the second quarter. Additionally, in certain instances, we have seen customers accelerate their first half destocking initiatives to be more weighted to the first quarter than initially expected, and we continue to see positive activities from our customers in the marketplace with increased promotional spending in 2024 that has expanded to include more of the products we produce. Turning to our segments. Our Dispensing and Specialty Closure segment delivered another strong quarter as market demand for our global dispensing products remain strong with significant momentum in the marketplace, our market-leading innovation production and service capabilities and excellent operational execution continue to drive compelling value for our customer partnerships. Consumer demand for our food and beverage products continues to be strong. And we've been encouraged to see increased promotional activity in the market for many of these products as seasonal demand begins to accelerate. As expected our customers' destocking plans for the first half of 2024 impacted our volumes in the quarter. And…

Thank you, Adam. As Adam highlighted, our business continued to deliver strong financial results in the first quarter despite evolving customer plans, and we delivered adjusted EPS at the high end of our expected range. Net sales of approximately $1.3 billion declined 7% from the prior year period, driven primarily by lower volumes in each of our segments and the pass-through of lower raw material costs. Total adjusted EBIT for the quarter of $135.5 million decreased by 9% on a year-over-year basis, primarily due to lower volumes in each of the segments. Higher adjusted EBIT in custom containers offset expected lower adjusted EBIT in the dispensing and specialty closures in Metal Container segment. Adjusted net income per diluted share was $0.69, with lower volumes primarily driving the year-over-year decline. Turning to our segments. Sales in our Dispensing and Specialty Closures segment declined 8% versus the prior year, primarily as a result of lower volume mix of 8%. The decline in volume was driven primarily by first half 2024 customer destocking activities in domestic food and beverage markets, which accelerated during the quarter to be more weighted to the first quarter. First quarter Dispensing and Specialty Closures adjusted EBIT decreased $5 million versus the prior year period with strong price cost, including mix that overcame the negative impact of the sell-through of higher cost of metal closure inventory in Europe due to lower metal costs in 2024 and partially offset the negative impact of lower volumes. In our Metal Container segment, Sales declined 8% versus the prior year, driven primarily by lower volumes of 5% as compared to very strong volumes in the prior year period. Destocking priorities continue to weigh on order patterns throughout the quarter. And similar to our Dispensing and Specialty Closures volumes, we did experience customers accelerating…

[Operator Instructions] And we'll take our first question from Ghansham Panjabi with Baird.

So Adam, on the accelerated destocking in the first quarter that you called out, I assume that was to some extent a pull forward from the -- what you previously expected in the second quarter as well. Can you just give us a bit more color on that, which categories were most impacted as you kind of think of the various operating segments.

Yes. I think you've got the right way to think about it, Ghansham. I mean, we had expected some destocking activity, primarily in food and beverage, again, mostly in North America for our business to impact the first half of the year. And what we saw, again, we talk a lot about our customer relationships. So just kind of in those regular discussions that we have with our food and beverage customers during the first quarter, several made the decision to bring forward that destocking activity. And really, they increase the percentage of their sales from their inventory, and that affected late in the first quarter, our shipment volume. So really, we were really right on plan kind of halfway through the quarter as far as our volume expectations. And so what's interesting is that did happen late in Q1, we're sitting here on May 1. So we've got a pretty good read to how Q2 has started now to at least from a volume perspective. So we've started Q2 strongly. So we are seeing the benefit of that volume returning and the positive inflection that we were anticipating for Q2. That's with the month of April already behind us. And our order book for Q2 is really solid right now. So we believe that we're reaching that inflection point that we've been talking about for some time. Again, product specific. You can think about pet food on the metal container side, and you can really think about our beverage business in the closure, dispensing the Specialty Closure segment.

Okay. Great. And then just as a follow-up question to that. So if your customers pull forward inventory destocking into the first quarter, does that necessarily mean that they've changed their promotional cadence as they look out to 2Q and beyond? I'm just asking because, obviously, you've seen a slight reacceleration of input costs and so on and so forth. So has there been any change in terms of your customers -- the dialogue with your customers as it relates to promotional activity.

Really, there hasn't. We've got pretty good intel into that spend for promotional activity in Q1 and how that compares to the prior year. And so the increases that we were expecting were actually realized in Q1. And I think the important part of that, at least for our product, Ghansham, those promotional activities were pretty effective for our customers. So they were pleased with kind of that very directed targeted promotional activity for the products that they were looking to promote, and it did lead to incremental sell-through. I think the other thing for us is we talk a lot about promotional activity in food and beverage. It certainly has expanded outside of those 2 categories into other segments for us in other parts of our business. And you can talk about home care, you can talk about lawn care, personal care, other products, we're seeing increased promotional activity across those segments as well.

I'll now take our next question from Gabe Hajde with Wells Fargo Securities.

I just had a question. You called out 20% of the pack mix of your metal containers business being fruit veggie. Are you -- would you disclose how much of that might be co-located with your customers? And we asked a similar question earlier today. Just in terms of reading articles about imported full cans of food, just trying to measure risk across the portfolio.

Sure. Maybe for that first question. Look, I think when you think about fruit and vegetables for us, it's just the business model itself, right? We're near site to where those products are growing, right? They typically are grown across certain set of acreage, then they're aggregated to a filling site. We're really close to where the products are actually filled. So that is broadly across our fruit and vegetable category. So that's how I'll answer the first part of that. Clearly, on the import of finished goods, that's something that we've been tracking for some time. We continue to monitor that in fairness, Gabe. We've seen that over time with some fruit products particularly coming from Asia. But as far as what's in our business today in fruit and vegetables, it really hasn't had much of an impact at all. It's really not a material volume that we've seen coming through. And really just not enough to impact our customers' business at this point.

Okay. And then maybe a little bit trying to tie together the Q1, I think segment profit or EBITDA, however we want to think about it was generally in line despite the little bit of weaker volume backdrop -- and so when I think about the rest of the year, and kind of this multiyear cost-out program. Did you guys perform a little bit better on that? I mean I know you still called out $20 million, I think, for this year, keeping another $30 million on the table for next year. But was it just -- what was the offset better performance? And then like I said, that $20 million, is there a potential for this year to be a little bit better than that? Or let's just kind of wait and see?

It's a really good question. And as we look at Q1, what I'd tell you, Gabe, we have a very stable kind of operating environment for the first time in several years. And so we're sort of back to the Silgan playbook. I mean we are good operators at the end of the day. And really, I think the primary impact to the first quarter was really just really good solid operating performance and our normal continuous improvement activities really benefited the quarter and all the other programs that we've been working on. That's in addition to the multiyear $50 million cost reduction initiative. So we made really good progress. We've got several plans that we've rationalized. We've got assets that are if not already in the location, they need to be, they're on their way. So we've made significant progress. There was a little savings in the first quarter from that $50 million project. But really, it was much more about the Silgan operating model and our continuous improvements that drove great operating performance in the quarter.

We'll now take our next question from George Staphos with Bank of America.

I guess, I want to take a different sort of approach to the question of destocking. So to the extent that your customers accelerated destocking in the quarter, Adam, does that -- I know your order books are good. and that's encouraging. But does that give you any concern about what customers are thinking about their volume outlook for the year, their ability to get product whenever they need it through the supply chain, right? I mean you get restocking when -- as a purchasing manager, you're worried, you're worried it's going to caution more you're worried not able to get it, you're worried that demand -- your supply won't keep up with demand. So is there kind of a gray cloud in this narrative that yes, destocking is nearly over. Yes, it was accelerated, and that's all wonderful, but it's probably because your customers are worried a little bit about the outlook in the second half of the year. How would you have us think about that?

Yes, it's an interesting take. I think -- again, what I would tell you is sitting here a month into the quarter, we can talk specifics about maybe pet food as an example, where we did again.

That was coming next.

It was a late -- okay. Well, it was a late addition to the destocking activities last year, right? So it was one of the primary categories that was going to linger into 2024 in the first half. And so -- that was an area where we saw the accelerated destocking activity. April shipments were terrific, and we're seeing the growth in the order book for May and June back to where it should be. So again, as you know, George, we're so close with these customers where we are on site, near site that we've got a pretty good understanding of what they believe their demand forecast looks at or looks like, excuse me, going forward. So I don't think it's a gray cloud. I think actually, the good news is that we're just about done talking about destocking because I think the larger impact in the first half just happened in Q1. And we -- we're sitting here with quite a bit of confidence that we have reached that inflection point for our volumes as we sit here in the middle of Q2. The other thing I would tell you, just as an indicator, we'll run over our containers business for just a moment, and really a different volume story really you're talking about in the other two businesses at this point. And to change the order patterns were in, it's -- there's good end consumer demand. And then there's also short order lead times where one of the items that we were concerned about is as our customers reduced their inventories, they didn't have enough to meet the end consumer demand. We're getting these kind of short order -- short lead time orders certainly in the Custom Container business to support end consumer demand. And so we just think for our products, which, for the most part, aren't discretionary, demand still has been very resilient, and we feel confident about the volume outlook.

Next question that I had is, and I think Gabe had sort of teed it up. And if you had answered that, I wasn't quite sure what the ultimate view was. But are you seeing any concerns? Do you have any concerns about procuring metal, steel or aluminum, given the various trade sanctions and other things that have been bantered about. I know the last few years have probably been very good learnings -- and learning periods for everybody no less than Silgan. I wouldn't imagine it's an issue, but nonetheless, I want to check that box. How do you view that right now?

Yes, sure. I think it's a good question. There's a lot of change going on, particularly on the metal supply base. And as you know, with our size and scale, we feel like we are advantaged in getting the raw materials that we need to support our customers. So it has not been a problem for us. It's something that we actively manage each and every day, but our teams have done a really good job of maintaining that supply chain all the way throughout. And we talked a couple of years ago, particularly one the aluminum side about how we extended our supply chain and the network of suppliers that support our business, and that's been beneficial as we work through any supply chain challenges. But as we sit here today, we're confident in our ability to procure the materials for our customers' products.

Last question for me, and I'll turn it over. Have you seen within your segments, any sort of evidence of -- and maybe you commented on this earlier, if you did, I missed it. In terms of a trade down or a move by the consumer to lower price point, more staple types of products and that showing up in your results are really not seeing that at all various categories and customers. How would you have us think about that from Silgan's perspective?

Yes. Again, another really good question. I think Q1 is probably too early to try to draw a conclusion in our products for that. But I go to our Custom Container segment, where we have seen that increase in the short lead time orders where consumers are seemingly focusing their spend on more nondiscretionary items. And again, that's really where we play with our business in all 3 segments are primarily nondiscretionary spend. So I think our order books would say our products are continuing to do well. Our consumers remain resilient. But I think there is a component of that, George, that these are mostly nondiscretionary products. And I think we'll be able to comment further on that at the end of Q2 as we see those volumes play through.

Our next question will come from Matt Roberts with Raymond James. Looks like [indiscernible] appears to have lost his connection, we'll move to Daniel Rizzo with Jefferies.

You mentioned nondiscretionary spending up, but I was wondering if you look at fragrance from beauty, if that's still kind of intact as well or if consumer trends are perhaps shifting away from that. I think in the past, if you mentioned that, that's kind of fairly stable as well.

Yes. Actually, I think demand for our global dispensing products remains really, really strong. So that's really unchanged for us. And as we think about fragrance and beauty. We've spent some time talking about which part of that market that we play in, and we are at the very high end of the kind of premium luxury end of that business. And those consumers really have not really changed their procurement patterns over some long period of time now. So really, we feel like those are largely unaffected. And then for some of our other dispensing items, we -- as we were preparing for some of our cost out initiatives. There were some instances where demand did outstrip our capacity. We built inventory to move a couple of lines and had quite a bit of demand on those products. So that was part of our shortfall in Q1 that will indeed recover in Q2. And again, part of why we have such good confidence that DSC in particular, is going to see a nice into volume in Q2.

Does the increase in short lead time orders suggest that your customers are willing to live kind of hand to mouth so to speak? Or can we expect a restock cycle, a real restock cycle, I don't know, sometime in the second half or surely thereafter?

Yes. It's a really good question. I probably would try to answer that similarly to how I just answered George's question. I think there's a combination of things, Dan, and -- and again, it's all underlying end consumer demand remains strong for our products. We believe, and we talked about a lot last year that we thought there were instances where our customers were taking inventory levels below historic levels, and we were having good conversations about that and maybe the need to replenish those. So there's a combination in Q1 of that happening. The order book is really strong for Q2. I'm sure it's a combination of those things as well. So I think it's a really good question, we'll have more detail at the end of the second quarter to really provide a stronger opinion of what we really think is happening. But it clearly is a combination of all those.

And last question, do you get a higher price points for short lead time orders? Does it matter really? I mean the length of -- I don't know, like.

It does depend. I mean remember, most of our business model is long-term contractual arrangements. So for that part of our business, no, not really. Those prices are set over a little period of time, but very [indiscernible] pass-through methods, et cetera. For a more transactional business, yes, we do.

We'll now take a question from Matt Roberts with Raymond James.

Quick on the fruit and vegetable customer, could you give us a little more color on the timing of when that occurs? Or is it just ongoing wind down through 2024? And it seems like you reiterated your volume outlook in metal containers for the year versus a couple of months ago. So are there any offsets within that segment we should be thinking of?

Yes. Look, for the time line of the communication and how it impacts Silgan, a couple of things. One, the customer we're talking about announced it publicly kind of in mid-March. So we were working with them a little bit before that, just to understand and, frankly, help them through the thought and planning process of how to implement a change like what they changed. As far as Silgan is concerned, how it affects us. Again, most of our past volume is in Q3. That's when our shipments are, as we talked a lot about, we make -- we build inventory, we make cans all year long. And so really for us, we've got a production shortfall now in Q2 because we would have been building inventory for that particular customer for shipments in Q3, along with the pack. So you've got some lost absorption in Q2. And then as we turn to Q3, that's where you'll see the volume impact. So hopefully, that's clear -- and then just remind me Matt, of your -- the second part?

I was saying are there any offsets within the container segment [indiscernible].

You're exactly right. So in fairness, we're probably to the lower end of the range that we provided now versus maybe being at the higher end of kind of low single digits. So we've got pretty good visibility to it now and feel comfortable that we're going to have growth in 2024.

Okay. And then on the $20 million in savings in 2024, I think you said there was a small portion in 1Q. Is there any change to that or how we should think about the timing throughout 2024? And hypothetically, if volumes didn't recover as expected, have you identified any incremental opportunities that could exist beyond the $50 million.

Let me take the back part of that question, and I'll pass it over to Ken to take the first part. So as far as how we view responses to maybe potential volume reductions later in the year. I mean, number one, we are focused on driving cost out of our business each and every day. It's just part of our DNA, and it is what we do. We're really focused on rightsizing our capacities to the demand that we see with our customers. and really don't think that there's any change to that as we sit here today. But that's an ongoing-iterative process that we really do work on each and every day in each of our businesses. And remember that we've got some nice growth opportunities as we sit here today in each of our segments as well. And with that, I'll throw it to Kim.

Sure. So of the $50 million cost reduction program, we had identified $30 million of cash this year as well as $20 million in savings and most of that savings will be in the back half of the year. But we have fully identified the savings and the cost to achieve it, and we're on track.

We'll take our next question from Mike Roxland with Truist.

I just wanted to get a little more color on where you're seeing demand out [indiscernible] your capacity? And what are you doing to address that demand in those categories, given what seems to be very strong order book on a go-forward basis?

Yes. That's a really good question. I probably should have been clear when I was talking about that. So it is in our global dispensing business. So that is an area where we have been adding capacity over time. In this particular instance, it's a product line that, again, we had a plan that we had worked through with our customers to relocate a couple of assets to increase capacity. And as we get that -- as we took those lines out of production, and we're relying on inventory, our customers' demand picked up just a bit. So they stripped through the inventory that we had agreed upon prior to the asset move. The good news that was in the first quarter, that asset -- those assets are in place and producing now again in Q2. So unfortunately, it's a blip, but it's a good reason for a blip and that our customers demand has remained very strong, and we're now in a better position to supply that from a lower cost and from a higher capacity standpoint.

Got it. And then just continuing on the Dispensing Specialty Closures for what you're seeing. Last quarter, you mentioned some business wins. I think you highlighted that again in the press release. Today -- can you provide some more color on those wins? And maybe what the cadence is on their deployment throughout 2024.

Sure. I think in dispensing and specialty, I mean, it really is more on the higher-value products and talking about new product launches in fragrance and beauty. I'd rather not give the names of what those are. But again, just think about where we play in those segments, again, it's the premium and luxury end of that profile. And it just has continued to experience really good growth for years now, regardless what the economic circumstances are. So I think really that's where we're having tremendous success, and we're having really nice success in other parts of the business. That's the one that we tend to focus our conversations on.

Got you. If I can just slip one more in here because you did mention earlier high single-digit growth in dispensing for the year. You're not really seeing the customer -- your customers paid at all. Although when you look at some of the companies that have reported, in the fragrance side. Their volumes have been a little bit lackluster with certain companies even like this [indiscernible] China. So just how do you reconcile, I guess, your growth in terms of premium or higher fragrance with what some of the beauty companies have posted over the last couple of i'd say weeks or the last few months.

Yes. It's a good question, Mike. And it's a couple of things. One, again, it's the subsegment of that market that we participate in back to that premium in luxury. So that's part of the answer. The other answer is, I mean, our team is doing a really good job. We're winning in that market. Our innovation, our design and research capabilities are clearly advantaged and being rewarded in that market space. We've become sort of the go-to in that market. So with new product launches, we are winning a disproportionate amount of those new product launches. And that's really what's driving our growth that I think is going to look a little different than what those luxury retailers or fragrance companies like maybe the ones you mentioned are going to show in their full company results. We're in a subsegment that continues to grow at a very nice clip.

We'll now take our next question from Arun Viswanathan with RBC Capital Markets.

Congrats on the [SAG] Q1 in the face of continued destocking here. So I guess I wanted to ask about two things. First, I think maybe could you just comment again on what you're seeing on the promotional side. And are you hearing from your customers that they're accelerating their destocking because the interest rate environment is still high and carrying costs are high. And thus, we wouldn't really see any kind of restocking until the interest rate environment normalizes? And then further on that point, are they conversely saying that, look, we're just going to start doing more with lower inventory and operating a little bit more just in time. Is that a structural change? Or I mean you guys have been in this industry for a long time. So just wanted to get your perspective on how your customers are really managing their own order portfolio.

Sure. Regarding promotional activity, again, what we've seen in several categories, and it's not just in Metal Containers, it also applies to Dispensing and Specialty Closures and Custom Containers. There is a notable increase from our customers on their promotional spend in the marketplace. And certainly, I think we focus the next part of the conversation on Metal Containers. We think that spend is being very effective. It's an efficient spend that's very targeted and where they allocate those promotional activities, they are seeing success. And I think the best example of that, we can probably even go back a quarter or two and talk about the soup category that around the holidays, very targeted promotional activity that drove the volume activity that they were desiring, and it was very successful. They are rolling that out in 2024 as part of their meeting campaign as well. So we think it's -- it's a more effective and more efficient spend that's very targeted. And we think so far, the results have been quite good. So we're very encouraged by what that means for our customers in 2024 and therefore, our volumes as well. For destocking, look, I think the interest rate conversation is an interesting one. I think that was part of our discussion last year is really destocking really sort of as interest rates were rising, destocking activity accelerated. And so we're just in regular dialogue trying to make sure we understand where inventory levels are, where they should be and how that compares to historic norms. So I don't think anyone at this point in our customer realm is saying that we now want to live with inventories well below our historic norms just because of interest rate. In fairness, I think our customers are talking about volume growth in 2024 as a key objective for their businesses. And in fairness, they need to have some inventory in place to do that because our lead times just don't support the turnaround that they need to have shorter order recovery of orders from consumers. So -- it's an interesting question. I don't think the interest rates are driving any destocking activity at this point.

Okay. And -- and just as a quick follow-up, is there any way you could kind of quantify inventories, whether at your level or your customer level, whether it's days of supply or weeks? I mean last year, we heard that inventories were at the retail level, destocking from, say, 8 weeks down to 4 weeks or something like that. But I guess, yes, I just wanted to get your thoughts on that. And then you also mentioned something about nondiscretionary. I guess we're a little bit -- I'm just a little bit struggling with that just because it seems like some of these categories that appeared nondiscretionary are inflation sensitive as well. So maybe just give us thoughts on that question around inflation and the impact on your volumes.

I think -- I'll just take the last one first. And just for me, as I sit here and think about our core products, go to food cans for just a minute, and you think about it's a meal. Soup is considered a meal. And that really is not discretionary. It's not a supplement. It's not a snack. It's not something that is an accompany meant to another category. And I'd also go with pet food as an example, those are full meals for pets, and it's half of our volume. So for us, we just don't think that our products really are discretionary by any real stretch of the imagination on the Metal Container segment. We've got functional beverage and other food and beverage products as well. And I think the rest of our business is less discretionary than maybe what some of our competition has as well. So -- and then trying to quantify the inventory levels. I think our commentary on that last year [indiscernible] is that our discussions with customers quickly turned, call it, maybe mid-year from a days on hand to kind of a dollars on hand discussion given all the inflation that they had taken not only in their packaging materials, but everything else that goes through with their products and ingredients, et cetera. And we're starting to transition back now to talking about unit level inventories versus dollars. So I think that's an important point. Unit level inventory is down, and we're now working very closely with our customers to figure out what the right level of inventory is going forward. But I don't believe, again, anyone is believing that they would be operating with inventory levels significantly below their historic norms as we go forward from a planning purpose.

[Operator Instructions] And we'll now take a follow-up from Gabe Hajde with Wells Fargo Securities.

I'll be brief. I just wanted to ask, I think one of the large functional drink customers that you're talking about your service here in North America, restate kind of how they get products from market. Curious if you experienced any impact from that or to a discernible from this "long-term destocking" phase that seems not persist for 18 months, generally seeing across packaging?

Yes, we agree. It's gone on longer than any of us had anticipated for sure. As far as that change in how they're supporting the market, really, for us, it does not touch our business. It's just whether the distribution point is a direct [sole] distribution or through a third party really doesn't affect us in really any way, Gabe. It's more about the end consumer demand that drives our volume versus how the product gets to retail.

And it appears there are no further telephone questions. I'd like to turn the conference back to our presenters for any additional or closing comments.

Great. Thank you very much, Anna, and I appreciate everyone's interest in Silgan's performance in Q1. Look forward to discussing our Q2 performance in July. Thank you.

And once again, that does conclude today's conference. We thank you all for your participation. You may now disconnect.