Welcome to the SelectQuote's Fourth Quarter Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers’ remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] It is now my pleasure to introduce, Matt Gunter, SelectQuote Investor Relations. Mr. Gunter, you may begin your conference.

Thank you, and good morning everyone. Welcome to SelectQuote's fiscal fourth quarter earnings call. Before we begin our call, I would like to mention that on our website, we have provided a slide presentation to help guide our discussion. After today's call, a replay will also be available on our website. Joining me from the company, I have our Chief Executive Officer, Tim Danker; and Interim Chief Financial Officer, Ryan Clement. Following Tim and Ryan's comments today, we will have a question-and-answer session. In order to allow everyone the opportunity to participate, we do ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up at a time and then fall back into the queue for any additional questions. As referenced on Slide 2, during this call, we will be discussing some non-GAAP financial measures. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation of the differences between the GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures are available in our earnings release and investor presentation on our website. And finally, a reminder that certain statements made today may be forward-looking statements. These statements are made based upon management's current expectations and beliefs concerning future events impacting the company, and therefore involve a number of uncertainties and risks, including but not limited to those described in our earnings release, annual report on Form 10-K and other filings with the SEC. Therefore the actual results of operations or financial condition of the company could differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements. And with that, I'd like to turn the call over to our Chief Executive Officer, Tim Danker. Tim?

Good morning and thank you all for joining us. We’re pleased to report a strong fourth quarter relative to our initial expectations and we are encouraged by the early achievements SelectQuote has made since we outlined our strategic redesign back in fiscal second quarter. Between the operational improvements we are seeing in our core senior business and continued success of SelectRx there is a lot to be optimistic about for SelectQuote. I'll provide color on each of these strategic initiatives in a minute, but first, let's turn to Slide 3 to review the highlights from our fourth quarter and full-year 2022. SelectQuote drove strong operating results relative to our internal forecast in both our core senior business and on a consolidated basis in the fourth quarter. Senior revenue was 98 million and consolidated revenue totaled 139 million for the quarter. Our net loss for the quarter totaled 105 million or negative $0.64 per share. Operationally, this was the second consecutive quarter of improving trends in our senior business. Trends that we believe are tied to our initiatives to optimize SelectQuote and drive better returns and more predictable cash flows. For instance, our agent close rates increased 31% compared to a year ago and our marketing cost per approved policy decreased 35%. Lastly, our SelectRx business finished the quarter above our original expectation of 25,000 members. We feel these results validate the service we provide to consumers and speak to how well SelectRx fits with SelectQuote and the healthcare services continuum. We're pleased with the better close rates, which aided revenue growth and more importantly, we are seeing [green shoots] [ph] that our customer retention trends are stabilizing and improving. And as mentioned, our results were also driven by continued success and our SelectRx business. Overall, this was a second consecutive…

Thanks, Tim. Let me begin with a quick review of our results and then I can give some context on our senior KPIs, as well as the cohort tail adjustment we recognized this quarter. I'll then follow-up with a review of the key assumptions in our consolidated guide for fiscal 2023. First, for the fourth quarter, as Tim noted, consolidated revenue for 4Q of 2022 was 139 million and consolidated adjusted EBITDA was negative 61 million or negative 13 million when excluding the $48 million cohort tail adjustment recognized in the quarter. Revenue was primarily driven by growth in our senior business and somewhat offset by a reduction in our Life business driven by lower term life premium which was the result of fewer agents and continued COVID pressure on conversion of sold policies to in-force policies. Our Auto & Home revenue was flat year-over-year. Overall, we are pleased with the operating results and believe they are in-line with our transition and show good progress in our strategic goal to drive better returns and cash flow. If we turn to Slide 8, I'll give some context on the key KPIs in our senior distribution business. Total improved policies from the senior division increased to 144,000, up 23% over the same period last year. As we noted last quarter, we saw a ramp in productivity from new and flex agents as the season progressed. As a result, [comparable close] [ph] rates increased 31% and marketing costs per approved policy declined 35% year-over-year. We would largely attribute these improvements to higher average agent tenure, as well as the initial impact of our strategic redesign initiative and the special election period. On the middle chart, you can see the 22% year-over-year decline in our Medicare Advantage LTV, which as we’ve noted, has been…

Absolutely. [Operator Instructions] The first question comes from the line of Elizabeth Anderson with Evercore. Elizabeth, you may proceed.

Hi, guys. Good morning. Thanks for the question. My first question was just regarding you talked about the fact that you have all the agents hired for the 2023 AEP season, can you talk about, sort of what you're doing differently this year with that? I think you mentioned that obviously it's a more tenured group, but, you know, with some of the changes that we've had about some of the, you know, requirements, what they have to do, etcetera, I just want to understand how you guys see that playing out at this point?

Yes, Elizabeth, good morning. This is Tim. Thanks for joining and thanks for the question. I'll make a few opening comments and then maybe turn it over to Bill. I think just more broadly with respect to AEP readiness, we feel very well-positioned this year from an agent perspective and Bill can speak to this. We've secured our flex agents very early this year and we're pleased with their progress and training. From a core agent perspective, we look to the past two quarters, the improvements in close rates. Our attrition levels for our core agents are actually better year-over-year and Bill can maybe touch on other things regarding marketing. Certainly, we note the improvements in cost of acquisition not only in fourth quarter, but in third quarter, so we feel overall very well positioned. Bill?

Yes. So, specifically around the class, what we did to address or prevent the problems from what occurred last year, I guess, we learned a lot from certainly what happened last year and how the market I would say, post-COVID and how they reacted with, kind of the hiring environment, so to speak, I would think – if you remember last year we had a lot of folks that would say, yes, and then wouldn't go through the licensing process. So, we had to move a lot of our ratios around. We started significantly earlier and then we're recruiting less folks. So, all of those things combined, I think led to a much earlier class being hired, as well as we think and believe higher quality and all of our, kind of leading indicators would suggest that thus far.

Got it. And then as a follow-up, what gives you comfort? I know that you talked about some of the cohort analysis on Slide 9. What gives you comfort that 875 really is the right number for fiscal 2023 in terms of MA LTV?

Yes. Thanks, Elizabeth. I think on that slide, as you move from left to right, we had 875 in 2023 and to the right, you saw that in prior periods, it was – the LTVs were much higher. We've obviously brought those down significantly. I think it's important to note that the vast majority of the switching and the highest persistency pressures does occur in the first year to second year. And so, when we look at those older cohorts, we are beyond that point, so we have better visibility into the cash stream we would expect to generate from those policies going forward. As we move, I guess, one other point there is, we have collected 70% of the lifetime value that we'd expect to calculate or generate from those policies. As we move into more recent cohorts, in 2022, obviously it does incorporate lower persistency as a result of the past couple of years and the pressures we've experienced. We've also layered in that incremental constraint of 15%, which is nearly triple what we had in prior periods and worked out to about $100 per policy. That cohort, the fiscal year 2022 is performing very well. When we look to 2023, obviously another year of higher persistency falls off, and so the calculation is a little bit lower. We have decided to maintain that 15% constraint just to keep it conservative. And so overall, we do believe that the vast majority of the back books is secure and the risk is largely behind and we feel good about what the economics that we're writing in the new policy there.

Got it. Thank you very much.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Jonathan Yong with Credit Suisse. You may proceed, Jonathan.

Hi, thanks for taking the question. I know we're not in AEP, but within the context of your guidance, can you give us color on how you're to give out MA enrollment and the number of policies or direction growth rates? I know it will be down year-over-year, but could you give us any color there?

Yes. So, we are assuming in the AEP period a pullback in overall policy production that is part of our strategic redesign. We do have all the agents hired and we feel good as we're entering in the AEP season, but there is a pullback.

Okay. But there’s no color [Multiple Speakers]

Yeah, I might add to that. Jonathan, I think as we looked at 2023 and we've highlighted this on the prepared remarks, certainly a year of transition of fiscal 2022 was a very difficult year for the company yet we certainly see greener pastures ahead. As we looked at it, I mean, the market opportunity is certainly large enough to bear more production, but we wanted to face the pullback on growth where we thought we could drive the best returns on invested capital. As we've committed to, we needed to reduce operating leverage and some of the operational risk factors. that were problematic last year and ultimately put a stronger focus on cash flow. And so, we were very deliberate with the plan this year, how could we drive our best marketing sources with our best, most productive agents and that's really what we've outlined in this 30% to 45% policy pullback, year-over-year and we think that certainly will dramatically improve the cash flow profile of our business And again, we're marching towards cash EBITDA breakeven this year.

Okay, great. And then on the – you increased the cost savings from [200 to 250] [ph] now, fixed components staying the same, but I guess relative to [our models] [ph] and consensus, I guess your EBITDA guidance is actually slightly worse than consensus about in-line with ours. Maybe it was a little bit in this modeling, but I guess with that increased 50 million, I thought there would have been a little bit more pull through in the EBITDA line. So, can you give us any color there on what may have changed maybe its timing or anything of that nature? Thanks.

Yes. So, with respect to…go ahead Tim.

Go ahead, Ryan.

Yes. I think there's [two things] [ph] in place. So, one, when we calculate it in care 200 million, we're actually slightly above that in total, but secondarily, there is some timing. When we look at the AEP and kind of what we're [hearing in early reads] [ph], as well as recent business performance from a cost per client acquisition, you know we do believe that the overall cost is going to come in favorable. So, that's really what's driving the total [indiscernible] savings of 250 million, we are still expecting the fixed cost savings of 40 million at that $40 million range.

Okay thanks.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Okay. The next question comes from the line of Meyer Shields with Keefe, Bruyette & Woods. You may proceed.

Great. Thanks. Good morning. Thank you for taking my questions. Can we get a little more detail on the credit covenant? Is there a change in the interest rate or the dollars that you expect to spend on interest in fiscal year 2023?

Yes. So, we're obviously very pleased to have the amendments in hand and to have lenders who are willing to work with us. As customary with amendments, there is obviously an economic component to that. And with that in the coming year, there is a step increase in the overall interest rate. A portion of that is payment kind and roughly one-third of it is actual cash interest.

Okay. With regard to the tenured agents, is there, in other words, looking at the same cohort, that's the wrong word, sorry, the same group of tenured agents relative to last year or the year before, is there any change to their compensation?

No, Meyer. Good question. There is not any change to their compensation on a per policy basis. We do expect with a more tenured force and just, kind of are planning for AEP that their overall compensation will be a bit higher because the productivity will be a bit better. We didn't necessarily model that way, but we are confident we can drive good results there, but no overall change.

Okay, perfect. Thanks so much.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Daniel Grosslight with Citi. Daniel, your line is now open.

Thanks for taking the question. I'd like to focus a little bit on the synergies that you mentioned between your, let’s call it the core Medicare Advantage comparison solution and SelectRx, I think it said around 70% of SelectRx members are actually introduced to SelectRx through that core MA solution and then there's some more on top of that that didn't actually select the MA policy through you guys, but ended up on SelectRx anyways. I'm curious how the slowdown in MA membership acquisition is going to impact the growth of SelectRx given a bulk of those SelectRx members are acquired through your core MA comparison solution?

Yes, Daniel. Good morning and thanks for the high quality question. We're very pleased with the synergistic relationship we're seeing here, extremely strong consumer demand. We eclipsed the goal that we set up for the year of 25,000 members. And I think we're seeing as we highlighted on our prepared remarks, this is business that we're generating for RX that's fantastic for the consumer and is absolutely leveraging the existing MA spend that we're seeing that across both customers that purchase an MA policy with us, as well as those that ultimately don't purchase the policy, but I might ask that Bob speak more to that and how we're looking at that going into 2023.

Yes. Thank you for the question. Just as a reminder, we didn't – we did not start really growing that business till late in the year. So, we don't think that that will come with any really pull down or anything like that, you know the 70% that we referenced is 70% of the members in SelectRx are ones from our core business, not necessarily 70% in total attachment rate if you look at the two numbers. Therefore, we still have a lot of room for upside with that. So, very, very excited and expect the progress there. And what it does for a customer really helps their overall medication experience. We see really, really strong adherence rates within that. And then also, when eligible, we see really strong MTM rates as well. So, we are very excited about our progress there and the revenue and value that's driving.

Got it. Okay. So, we'll have room to grow SelectRx and that kind of existing MA membership dates. And then I guess big picture question for you guys, if you listen to the earnings reports of all your public competitors and even talk to some of your private competitors too, everyone on the e-broker side is cutting marketing and agent hiring costs pretty dramatically. And then if you look at what the carriers are saying and what CMS is projecting for MA overall, it continues to grow rapidly. So, obviously, a shift in where members are going to be getting their policies from. So, two questions there. Are you assuming more beneficiaries going forward or just going to go direct to the carriers or access through traditional agents? And then secondly, how do you think the slowdown broadly in marketing and agent hiring for the sector is going to impact persistency, LTVs, and CACs going forward?

Yes. Great question, Daniel. I'll maybe address your second question first and have Bill and Bob comment on the first one. I mean, I would say with respect to the competitive environment, we are seeing a pullback in spend and competition. And we do think that that is could – we could certainly benefit from that. It could lead to more rational behavior long-term. But with that said, I mean, we're not – this is in the strategy based on hope. We are controlling the controllables and we certainly think that we can drive better returns in the business and we haven't talked a lot about it on the Q&A here, but the persistency results that we're seeing from a series of actions that we've taken really starting late in third quarter across marketing segmentation to agent retraining to modifications to sales comp to changes in our tech stack. We're starting to see the persistency pressures stabilize and actually are witnessing a little bit of year-over-year improvement. So, we think that that's all encouraging early signs. I maybe turn it over to Bill or Bob on your first question.

Yes. I mean, I can certainly comment from the marketing side. We certainly see it, kind of right now with a tailwind all the way around, both from just the volume that is available, as well as the quality. We've been able to do two things. One, we've been able to decrease cost. fairly significant while getting a better quality customer. As it relates to where the business will go, I think that, kind of see how that plays out and certainly in the combination of carriers that obviously with COVID, kind of winding down some of the FMO channels in terms of the face-to-face agents is coming back a bit, and then certainly the e-channels. I also think that there will be a bit of just less marketing that's driving those call sometime. So, last year, if you look at it, you have the airways we're, kind of being really jammed over and over and over again with ads more and more ads. I think you'll see less of that this year. So, hopefully you'll see with that as Tim mentioned, maybe better persistency or folks jumping plan to plan thinking that there's something better out there for them.

I was going to say, I think Bill spoke to it well, but they're well diversified. Can't necessarily speak to their overall growth strategy, but FMO channel has definitely come back a bit and they're diversified within our channel. So, yes, you've seen the public companies pull back really focus on growth and those things, but don't really want to speak to exactly how they're planning their growth.

Yes. Thank you.

Thank you. The final question comes from the line of Ben Hendrix with RBC Capital Markets. Ben, your line is now open.

Thank you very much. I just wanted a quick follow-up on the credit agreement covenants. Having elected to recognize that additional 48 million of tail adjustment here in the quarter, can you talk about the cushion that you have under the new minimum asset coverage ratio and kind of give us an idea of your tolerance for additional potential tail adjustments should persistency decline further? Thanks.

Yes. I think there's a couple of parts in there. One, with respect to persistency in the 48.3 million, I think it’s worth pointing out that this is not as a result of new persistency pressures. And in fact, we're actually feeling good about some of the positive trends that we're seeing from a persistency perspective. That said, as we are preparing the guide for fiscal year 2023 and doing the quarterly analysis that we do each quarter, it did become clear that some cohorts that had not fully exhausted their constraint would be doing so in the coming quarters ahead, and so it made sense to go ahead and take that at this time. That has been all factored into the covenants and the compliance ratios on a go forward basis. We spent a lot of time with the lenders walking them through our plan for fiscal year 2023, and our covenants are set in-line with those – the [compliance calcs] [ph] that are embedded within our guide. We do have some buffer and we've been intentional about making sure that we have a plan that we can execute against.

Yes, I would just emphasize that last point, Ben. I mean, we – this amendment provides the covenant adjustments and the liquidity we need to operate the business for fiscal 2023 and we feel good about that position and our preparation going into AEP.

Thanks, guys.

Thank you. There are no questions waiting at this time. So, I would now like to pass the conference over to Tim Danker for closing remarks.

Thanks again for joining us this morning. As we've noted before, we take our responsibility to produce improved and more stable financial results very seriously. We're committed to earning that credibility with investors through our results. As we stand here today, we're clearly shifting our strategy for fiscal 2023, but we're increasingly confident of the success in that strategy based upon the early results that we've seen from our initiatives. So, we look forward to sharing more with our – about our progress on that end. We look forward to talking with you soon. Thanks again.

That concludes the conference call. Thank you for your participation. You all might now disconnect your lines.