Greetings, and welcome to the Simply Good Foods Company Fiscal Second Quarter 2024 Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions]. Please note this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to Mark Pogharian, Vice President of Investor Relations. Thank you, you may begin.

Thank you, operator. Good morning. I'm pleased to welcome you to The Simply Good Foods Company earnings call for the fiscal second quarter ended February 24, 2024. Geoff Tanner, President and CEO; and Shaun Mara, CFO, will provide you with an overview of results which will then be followed by a Q&A session. The company issued an earnings release this morning at approximately 07:00 A.M. Eastern Time. A copy of the release and accompanying presentation are available under the investor section on the company's website at www.thesimplygoodfoodscompany.com. This call is being webcast and an archive of today's remarks will also be available. During the course of today's call, management will make forward-looking statements that are subject to various risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially. The company undertakes no obligation to update these statements based on subsequent events. A detailed listing of such risks and uncertainties can be found in today's press release and the company's SEC filings. Note, that on today's call we will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures that we believe will provide useful information for investors. Due to the company's asset-light strong cash flow business model, we evaluate our performance on an adjusted basis as it relates to EBITDA and diluted EPS. We have included a detailed reconciliation from GAAP to adjusted items in today's press release. We believe these adjusted measures are a key indicator of the underlining performance of the business. The presentation of this information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the financial information presented in accordance with GAAP. Please refer to today's press release for reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. I'll now turn the call over to Geoff Tanner, our President and CEO.

Thank you Mark. Good morning. Thank you for joining us. Today I will recap Simply Good Foods financial results and the performance of our brand. Then Shaun will discuss our financial results in more detail before we wrap it up with a discussion of our fiscal 2024 outlook and your questions. Simply Good Foods second quarter results were led by continued Quest growth as well as strong gross margin improvement. Net sales increased 5.3%, driven by volume and due to the timing of shipments last quarter, outpaced retail takeaway of about 3%. Retail takeaway in measured channels was less than our expectations. E-commerce POS growth for both Quest and Atkins continued to be solid. Quest retail takeaway was on track with our plans driven by strong salty snacks growth while Atkins performance was off versus our estimates. Atkins had solid plans in place, but was ultimately disadvantaged on two fronts during the quarter. First, it left a onetime merchandising and promotional benefit that it had in the 2023 New Year, New You season, due to the out of stock challenges of a category participant. And second, in the 2024 New Year, New You season this category participant had adequate supply to service its base business. It then layered in extensive merchandising programs and promotions during the season, which greatly reduced the overall in-store share of voice for the Atkins brand and others. In March as we exited the New Year, New You season and moved past the difficult lap, Atkins trends improved. More on that in a bit. We were very pleased with the Q2 gross margin of 37.4%. The 280 basis point increase versus the year ago period was primarily due to lower ingredient and packaging costs. Higher gross profit enabled investments in our business, and an increase in…

Thank you, Geoff. Good morning, everyone. Total Simply Good Foods second quarter net sales of $312.2 million increased $15.6 million, or 5.3% versus the year ago period, and was driven by Quest volume growing. North America and international net sales increased 5.1% and 12.3% respectively. As Geoff stated earlier, as expected, net sales growth was greater than retail takeaway of about 3%, primarily due to the timing of shipments last quarter. Recall, in Q1 POS growth of about 8% outpaced the net sales increase of nearly 3%. Moving on to other P&L items for the quarter, gross profit was $116.9 million, an increase of $14.1 million from the year ago period, resulting in gross margin of 37.4%. The 280 basis point increase versus the year ago period was primarily due to lower ingredient and packaging costs. Adjusted EBITDA was $57.8 million, an increase of $6.9 million from the year ago period. Selling and marketing expenses were $34.6 million versus $29.9 million, an increase of 15.7%, largely due to higher marketing investments and growth initiatives. GAAP G&A expenses were $29.9 million, an increase of $4 million versus last year, primarily due to higher employee-related costs, stock-based compensation, and corporate expenses. Excluding stock-based compensation, G&A increased $2.5 million to $25.4 million. Finally, net interest income and interest expense was $4.7 million, a decline of $3.6 million versus Q2 last year. The decline was due to lower debt balances versus the year ago period. Our Q2 tax rate was about 24% versus 25% in the year ago period. As a result, net income was $33.1 million versus $25.6 million last year. Moving on to year-to-date results, net sales were $620.9 million, increasing about 4% versus last year. This is slightly below year-to-date retail takeaway in the combined measured and unmeasured channels, which is…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. Our first questions come from the line of Matt Smith with Stifel. Please proceed with your questions.

Hi, good morning Geoff and Shaun.

Good morning.

The overall active nutrition category growth slowed in the first calendar quarter of the year, that's during the key diet season. You talked about the competitive dynamic impacting Quest and Atkins. But from a high level, was the performance of the overall category in line with your expectations and are you seeing any signs of a pickup in growth in the categories as we move past March?

Yes. No, the category continues to show strong growth. It certainly has slowed versus the past couple of years. If you look backwards, you see a bump coming out of COVID and then you've had a lot of inflation-driven growth. We're now back to around 6% or 7% which is where the category was pre-COVID. And additionally, it continues to be a standout category versus most of the standard store where, as you know, volumes are flat. And that reflects some underlying drivers, health and wellness trends, snacking convenience. It's got low household penetration that we've talked about before and it over-indexes with younger consumers. So we continue to be excited where the category is performing. It's right where we expect it to be. And retailers see that, too. It's why we're working with them on how to even further accelerate that growth.

Thank you Geoff and as a follow-up, the lower revenue guidance includes a 7% reduction in POS for Atkins for the year. Does that outlook consider improving dollar consumption from here, are you looking at dollar consumption for the Atkins brand and believing you can hold that level and then you benefit from easier comparisons in the second half of the year from a POS perspective?

Yes, that's what it is. Obviously, we're disappointed how Atkins performed in January, February. And obviously, we walked into some tough competitive merchandising comps. We still remain confident in the long-term vitality of the business, and as we look forward, we certainly have seen trends improve that have come out of January and February. And certainly, for the balance of the year, we do have easier comps, and that's why we expect the business to return more to that mid-single-digit decline.

Yes, Matt if you look at it by -- for Q3 and Q4, then Q3 is relatively in line with what we saw in Q2, slightly better in Q4 because we get some easier laps as you said, overall. So we're not expecting drastic changes in the trajectory in the next X period of time.

Thank you, I will leave it there.

Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Alexia Howard with Bernstein. Please proceed with your questions.

Good morning everyone.

Good morning.

Just a couple of quick questions here. You've got innovation stepping up and it feels as though we've been through a few cycles of innovation over the last few years, some of which haven't worked, some of which has. What metrics do you use to make sure innovation is successful and sustainable in the marketplace and how do you track that over time to make sure that you're calling things that aren't going to work and obviously supporting things that are?

Yes. I mean, Alexia, I'd probably point to the innovation on Quest, which has been I think, a standout and a major driver of growth and very successful. If you look at chips, for example, we're seeing 40% growth in that business, and it continues to be highly incremental. We're excited about the bake shop platform that we have coming up on Quest. So I'd say the innovation on Quest has been incredibly successful and certainly retailers view it that way and continue to reward us with more space. If you look at Atkins, and I've been quite transparent about this on previous calls, we were very disappointed with the quality and level of innovation on Atkins over the past couple of years, which has contributed to the slowdown in the brand. It's why we have jump started innovation on Atkins. It was certainly one of my priorities coming into the role. And I think the quality of the innovation we're bringing to market on Atkins over the next -- we will cut statin in the fall and thereafter it is much stronger. Where we've tried to push is innovation that's more incremental to the business, more platform focused. But we do know that on Atkins, what we're trying to do is hold on to shelf space and replaced underperforming items with the innovation. So the jobs are different on innovation for both businesses. Right now, on Atkins, it's replacing underperforming items with better items. On Quest, it is about innovation that is incremental to the business and incremental to the category.

Alexia, just to touch on your process question, I think, a little bit there. When we kind of launch any new innovation, we go through a process internally, what the metric we kind of look at as we go out there, our ACV build then turns per week and then related to that kind of repeat purchase. So those are the metrics we kind of model out before we launch anything and then we evaluate that performance, if you want to call it that, over the first six months or so of the launch to see how successful it would be.

Really appreciate the details from both of you. I'll pass it on. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Steve Powers with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed with your questions.

Thanks guys, sorry I was on mute there. Hey, a first question on Atkins and weight management category dynamics in general. You talked about the expectation that the competitive environment, the competitive dynamics would normalize as we go through the calendar year. I guess a little bit more perspective on where your confidence comes from in that and yes, we'll take it from there?

Yes. No, the reality is that this time last year, as we talked about in the prepared remarks, one of our major competitors had supply challenges and that was particularly acute over the January and February period. And as a result, Atkins benefited significantly, particularly in a few customers, from outsized merchandising and promotional support, which we obviously didn't get this year. So that was going to be a difficult lap. And that competitor is now back and able to service the business. So it was an inevitable difficult New Year, New You season, but we will lap that. And as we've come out of January, February trends have improved, and I'd say by around the summer, we should be largely lapped -- that effect should be largely lapped, which is why our comps should get easier.

Okay. Yes. Okay, makes sense. And then pivoting over to Quest, you highlighted, Geoff, the ready-to-drink coffee innovation, which is interesting to me. I guess as you think about the pipeline for Quest from an innovation perspective, what -- how big a role do you think beverages will play versus further endeavors in food and if beverages are envisioned as kind of a material driver of the franchise going forward, how do you think about prioritizing future consumption occasions versus the media consumption occasions and just the complexities of reaching different channels, especially on the immediate consumption side?

Yes, I mean -- the thing that has driven the success of Quest innovation is the brand flipping, we call them flipping the macros on large snacking category. So flipping the macros from high sugar, high carb, high protein, and low sugar, which is what we've done with our Iced Coffee launch, and I'm excited to see how that performs. It's certainly early days, and we'll monitor it closely. And if we continue to do well, we'll continue to double down there. To your question on beverage, despite rest assure, we're looking at it, it's obviously it's a large category. And if we can find a way to go in and disrupt that category in a way similar to how we plan to disrupt sweet baked goods, we would certainly look at that. And even drawing a broader circle, where we see those opportunities to give Quest consumers the same quality and taste that they desire of large snacking categories, we're looking at it.

Okay, thank you. Thank you very much.

Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Pamela Kaufman with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your questions.

Hi, good morning. How are you thinking about your revenue progression over the back half of the year and what gives you confidence that you can deliver on the updated revenue guidance, I guess where do you see potential for upside or downside to your new outlook?

Yes, I'll start and maybe turn it over to Shaun. I'd say the upside is we are moving into easier -- what we believe will be easier comps on Atkins. And we do remain confident in the revitalization plan, the new advertising. We're confident in the new innovation that's launching albeit towards the end of our fiscal. And we're walking to easier comps. So could be some upside there. And on Quest, the momentum that we've seen, just looking at March, mid-double digit is very encouraging. We've just launched new advertising that launched in the beginning of March. So that gives us a lot of confidence. And then Quest too is bringing some pretty exciting innovation to market. So there could be some upside there, but I'll turn it over to Shaun.

Yes. I mean I think if you take a look at the brands, I mean, Quest, we're assuming from a consumption standpoint, low double digits. And as Geoff said, through March, so only four weeks, we're at 13%, a little bit higher than that. So I feel like we're trending a little above what we thought. We'll see what happens. So feel pretty good with that. We also have the advertising we turned on, which I think is going to help overall from a consumer awareness and household penetration standpoint. So I feel very comfortable with where we are with Quest. On Atkins, I think we have put ourselves in a position where we have a, I'll say, realistic target to chase in the second half of the year. As I mentioned, Atkins is basically consistent with the decline we saw in Q2 for Q3, slightly better and as -- in Q4, I'm sorry. And then as it relates to the first month of the quarter, we're trending down about 6%, as I think you saw in the slides, which is better than what we thought from a standpoint of the quarter. So again, early one month in, but feel like we're tracking ahead of where we thought we were going to be.

Okay. That's helpful. And then can you talk about any adjustments that you're making to your strategy this year given the performance and competitive dynamics you saw during the second quarter, you mentioned that you're accelerating some innovation like the protein shakes, can you expand on any other changes in your innovation timing or changes to advertising or promotional plans for the year?

Yes, I mean I said at a high level, we're not really changing our strategy. The impact that we felt on Atkins in January, February, it was a onetime difficult lap, as we talked about in the prepared remarks, but we remain confident in the future vitality of the brand. We remain confident in the revitalization plan we've talked about. The innovation with brand to market, the new packaging graphic work that's underway, the product upgrade work that's underway, the new advertising, and we're certainly going to stay the course there. We'll make adjustments if we need to, but certainly wouldn't overreact to a merchandising -- difficult merchandising lab in January, February.

Thank you. I will pass it on.

Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Jim Salera with Stephens. Please proceed with your questions.

Hi guys, good morning. Thanks for taking our questions. I wanted to drill down a little bit on Atkins Strong offering. Exciting to see you guys expand the RTD shake offering. Obviously, it's been a really hot category. At the same time, it's also a category that has pretty well-known capacity constraints. So if you could offer any color on co-manufacturing partners, how much capacity you guys think you'll have when that product kind of comes to market and if we should expect it to be maybe just in club or just in mass or kind of how the channel rollout will be as you expand that 30 gram offering?

Yes. We're also really excited about this launch. It was designed, as we've seen these weight loss drugs emerge and adoption increase, and we've learned that consumers on those drugs are seeking higher levels of protein to maintain muscle mass when they lose weight. And we've also heard that when they're on the drugs, many experience gut health issue. So we developed this product the primary consumer with those on a weight loss drugs. But we know that there's consumers out there who are seeking higher levels of protein. So we're excited to bring that to market. We're going to put a lot of support behind it. Retailers have been candidly very impressed with how quickly we moved to develop a product for consumers on these drugs. To your question on capacity, we feel we're in a good spot. It is not a limited launch. We will launch it nationally, and we've had extremely strong support.

Yes. I think on the capacity side, just to take a step back, I'd go back about a year, year and half ago, we had some capacity constraints. Basically got another co-man on board in terms of additional capacity. So we have expanded the capacity that we have for Atkins [ph] in general, overall. And we're actually -- I think we have enough to support both that business as well as the continuing business we have overall. So we feel like we're in pretty good shape there.

Okay, great. And then maybe if I could ask a broader question just on the consumer. We've heard from other companies, there's kind of a bifurcation of the higher-income consumers still powering forward and lower income consumer, maybe feeling a little bit more pressured. Since your products tend to skew towards middle to higher income consumer, do you have -- what's your confidence level as the year progresses that the higher income consumer will continue to be resilient relative to the overall kind of economic uncertainty?

Yes. I mean we continue to see the category perform. The category performed year after year after year. And I think a part of this for the reason that you cite is that we do over-index with higher income consumers. So I think we're a little more insulated. I would point to the relative lack of private label in the category. I would point to the relative lack of heavily -- heavy promotional activity in the category. And I think it shows the underlying consumer demand, which, to your point, I think, is reflective that we over-index with higher income or educated consumers.

Great. Appreciate the color guys. So I'll hop back in the queue.

Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of John Baumgartner with Mizuho. Please proceed with your questions.

Good morning, thanks for the question.

Good morning John.

Maybe first off, Geoff, you mentioned the heightened category competition around New Year, New You. I think you called out one specific competitor. But I'm curious, can you expand a bit on competition more broadly. Are you seeing competition based solely on pass-through of lower input costs and that moderates throughout the year as those tailwinds also moderate or is there also any heightened activity from new innovation hitting the shelves or a larger intensity also impacting future display activity?

Yes, I mean, I would probably take a step back and say the level of activity in this category, I think, is what you would expect, right. Innovation, can play a role and we have certainly seen what we've been able to do with Quest chips, which was essentially to create a category or a segment that didn't exist. The heightened level of competitive activity that we talked about in the prepared remarks, really does relate to some out-of-stock challenges on shakes. And the industry was constrained, had been constrained for a couple of years. And obviously, with that being turned back on, you've seen demand being able to be supplied. But I wouldn't say that this is a new level of competitive activity. I think it was an inevitable lap and one that we were always going to be on the wrong side of and in the New Year, New You period. But now with supply back, I'd say we're going to return to a normal level.

Yes. I think, John, if you take a step back and look at last year, with one of the key competitors in this marketplace for RTDs, having less availability or capacity, the shelf space they had was less. So now they got that back, and they've actually added not so much innovation, but if you want to call it, pack size configurations, four packs to eight packs or 12 packs as well as maybe more space devoted to that competitor for display. So you're really seeing, I think, two years of growth in one quarter versus what we've usually see out there. So we stepped up our merchandising activity and programming. It's just the share of voice was less than what it was comparatively to everybody else. Does that help?

Yes, definitely. I guess, sticking with that theme, I guess, last quarter it sounded like your initial perceptions on new marketing coming out of autumn was pretty encouraging in the early days. I guess building on your point there, Shaun, I mean do you get the sense that the ROI and that marketing, does it require further increases in spending from here to sort of maintain share of voice, how do we think about that? And then for the Atkins brand milestones going forward, I guess, how impactful are you expecting the autumn shelf resets to be in terms of jump-starting sales, should those autumn resets really be used material catalyst or pivot point?

The advertising, we're really pleased with the new advertising we debuted in October. We saw the business response. Certainly, it's probably too early to draw a hard line on that. But just given the magnitude of the merchandising lap that I talked about in the prepared remarks, it's very difficult, if not impossible to judge the effectiveness of that advertising in January and February. And as proof to that, we've come out of the New Year, New You period and trends on the business have improved. As I said, the ads tested very well. They tested well with both current buyers and potential new buyers. But with that being said, we'll continue to monitor performance over the coming months and if we've got to make changes in the advertising, we will. To your question on distribution, I recall, we're category advisers to the majority of our key retailers. And as such, we have a lot of dialogue with them about the category and brand dynamics. We recently wrapped up a road show visiting all those customers, talking about the brands and in particular, Atkins, an emphasis of those conversations was the new conversation and renewed cultural relevance, I would say, of weight because of these weight loss drugs and what consumers on those drugs are looking for and how they want an off-ramp. The retailers get it. They appreciate our transparency. They're supportive of the revitalization plan and we're currently in conversations with them about modulars and they will play out over the coming two to four months.

Yes, John, just one more color here. I think as you think about the rest of the year and the guidance we gave on EBITDA, one thing should be clear on that, I hope, overall, the gross margin should meaningfully improve in the next couple of quarters approaching 39% in both Q3 and Q4, a little better in Q4 than Q3. With that, we're continuing to invest in the brand. So we did not reduce marketing spend to get to that number. That wasn't what we did, we basically took the benefit that we had for gross margin in Q2 and what we're seeing in Q3 and Q4 that allowed us to continue to invest, and you're going to see meaningful increases, particularly on Quest with new advertising in Q3 and Q4.

Thanks Shaun, thanks Geoff.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Kaumil Gajrawala with Jefferies. Please proceed with your questions.

Maybe if I could follow up on the comment on ad spend. Can you maybe just talk a little bit more about what's the right percentage of sales for ad spend, particularly in the context of there's so many new innovations this year, does it need to be at some higher level for a temporary period of time and then sort of taper off or is where you're going linked to what you mentioned before, some of that GM benefit that you're about to feel?

So we would historically target spending 9% to 10% on marketing. What I will say is that is a high level of spend in the food beverage category in general. And certainly, a very high level of spend within our category. And that's the role that we play as category leaders. As to your question on how to support innovation as well as the core business, what you'll see in both campaigns is that they have been developed to enable us to do that. So I don't know if you've seen the new ads on Quest, but they've been constructed to enable us to support the multitude of different products on the brands while also driving the overall brand awareness and delivering the positioning of the brand. So what we don't like having a choice between support the core business or innovation. What I'd like to do is have advertising that you can input innovation into that ad and it still works.

A couple of data points for you. Just as you take a step back and look at this, I mean I think our model has been since the beginning in terms of the P&L profile, try to get to gross margins around 40%, try to get to advertising or marketing spend in the 9% to 10% range and EBITDA margins around 20%. And I think we're getting back to that after some issues we had the last couple of years for some commodity inflation. As it relates to the total marketing spend, you probably saw and the results were up 100-plus basis points for the quarter in the first half of the year. That will continue in the second half of the year. So you'll see marketing spend closer to 9-ish% for the rest of the year.

That's useful, thank you. And just a quick follow-up boring question. 53rd week, any context on contribution and do we just take it out of next year?

Yes, absolutely taken out of next year, yes. Let me get to that one first. So then the 53rd week, I mean, I think historically, we've said it's a little bit more a point of growth. You just can't take 52 -- and I say, "Here's how much to work because with the way our fall resets work, we generally speaking, ship those sort of early August, mid-August. So we don't get the replenishment of that probably until mid-September. So it's just a little more than one point of growth overall. We don't have the specifics of that at this point in time. We'll have better clarity on that, I hope, in Q3.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Brian Holland with D.A. Davidson. Please proceed with your questions.

Yeah, thanks, good morning. I wanted to go back to the competitive dynamic component because we're seeing a pretty clear divergence between bars and shakes, the entire bars category has been softer of late. And then within shakes, there's sort of a bifurcation between the weight management and some of the other heavier protein products. So maybe a two-part question here. One, I guess I'm a little bit surprised to hear the attribution for the weakness when it's coming from the -- I guess the growth is coming from shakes that you're talking about, that's where the supply is improving. So the impact it's having on bars and everything else, so maybe a little bit more color around just understanding why you think that is particularly impacting Atkins because I guess I'm surprised that we would see that level of shopping -- cross shopping between those brands? And then the second one is not necessarily a new dynamic. We knew that supply was coming and something that had been communicated, something that's been ongoing. So maybe -- so I guess to the extent that it's hitting your business at a level at a magnitude greater than expected. So -- was the impact of that supply coming back online just greater than what you thought in the consumer response to it greater than you thought because it doesn't seem like something that we didn't know was coming?

Yes, that's fair. I'll address your first question, which is the observation on bars. I guess the first thing I would comment is, while bars growth has slowed, Quest has proven to be an exception to that, Quest bars are up mid-single digits, and we're very pleased with that level of growth. But certainly, you have seen shakes growth outstrip bar growth. And honestly, as we've talked about, that's not really a supply -- not a surprise because supply was constrained for two years, so I think as Shaun said in response from an earlier question, what you're seeing was shaped essentially two years of growth in one. And that dynamic has played out January, February, and will until we're finished with that lap, which is more towards the summer. So -- and then to your question on -- I think your question was, should you have known more than we did about the dynamic that we were going to walk into in January and February? And I'd say the answer is yes. And looking forward, going forward, you should expect us to perhaps be more attuned to competitive dynamics and to think about merchandising as a share of voice versus just looking at our own plan. So you should expect that change moving forward.

I appreciate all the color. And then just back to Atkins, just curious, your messaging has been fairly consistent for the past -- since you talked about the revitalization plan and the potential opportunity over time with the GLP-1 complement. Just curious if you've picked up anything anecdotal to increase your conviction to that end because I do think that seems to be a point of contention with investors who I hear a lot of inbound kind of inquiries about, they feel like this is a head -- this would be a headwind to the business because of the overlap of the consumer and maybe they'd be changing their routine away from an Atkins just using the GLP-1. So clearly, the innovation seems to be the 30 grams of protein that seems to be resolving some of this. But just curious what you've picked up anecdotal that gives you increased confidence that Atkins indeed will be a complement and GLP-1 will be a tailwind for that business?

Yes, I would start by saying we are in the early innings of GLP-1 and we're still learning. We're doing our own studies. We're talking to consumers, we're talking to customers. We do believe that GLP-1 does represent a tailwind for Atkins and the tailwind for the category. We know that when consumers are on these drugs, as I answered earlier, they have a need for higher protein products and they have got health issues, which is why we accelerated the launch of Atkins Strong to market, and we're excited about the launch of that platform. And retailers have given us a lot of credit for moving quickly and coming to market with something that specifically addresses that need. I would say that I'm equally, if not more, excited about Atkins as an off-ramps, as an off-ramp for consumers who want to get off the drugs. There's a battle going on with insurers. As you know, our own research suggests that most people once they've hit their weight loss goal, once you get off those drugs they know there's a good chance they'll put the weight back on, and they're desperate to find some sustainable program or sustainable way of eating to keep that weight off, and I think that's where Atkins can shine. And moving forward, you should expect us to more clearly position the brand as that off-ramp, as that sustainable way to keep that weight off. So I continue to believe that the GLP-1 drugs are a tailwind. But I would reiterate, we are still in the early innings.

Got it. And forgive me, if I could just take a really quick one in, if you stated this earlier, I apologize. Was Quest in line with expectations in the quarter?

Yes.

Yes.

Okay, great, thank you.

Thank you. Our last question will come from the line of Jon Andersen with William Blair. Please proceed with your questions.

Well, thank you very much for squeezing me in. Question about household penetration. You've talked about the category of active nutrition being relatively low relative to other standard store categories. Where are you today with Quest and where is Atkins with respect to household penetration? And then as you look forward, what’s the goal or opportunity around each of the brands, so as you're innovating, as you are marketing, are you looking to drive household penetration and buy rate across both brands, is there a greater opportunity within one of those areas, thinking that, that may -- that opportunity may differ by brand, but a little color around that would be helpful? Thanks.

Yes. I'll start with the categories. Household penetration of the categories are in mid-50s and that compares with high 80s, low 90s with most standard store categories, which is why we continue to see a long-term runway. And if you look at where the category over indexes, it is with younger consumers, millennials and Gen Zs. So we continue to believe that penetration of the category is only going to increase. And certainly, retailers see that which is why they're excited to work with us on initiative to accelerate category penetration. As you look at the respective brands, Quest is around 16% or 17% household penetration. But as we've talked about, for a brand of its size, awareness is significantly below most of its competitors, which is why we're excited about new advertising. And then as you click one level lower, with Quest, we believe there's an opportunity to drive increased household penetration and buy rate. And in particular, the new innovation platforms are helping to drive buy rates, right. Because we're offering consumers additional snacking occasions and that just increases buy rate. So I think as you look on Quest, there's an opportunity to drive household penetration up as we focus on increasing awareness. Advertising is the big driver there. There's an opportunity to drive buy rate up, and in particular, I would point to the new innovation platform salty and the new bakeshop platform, which is offering a completely new usage occasion right, disrupting a sweet baked goods. On Atkins, the awareness levels are quite high. And so that is less of an opportunity on that brand. The opportunity on Atkins, I think, is to continue to ensure that consumers see the brand as a sustainable way to maintain weight. And I continue to believe innovation, better innovation than we have launched in the past is an opportunity with that brand.

Just real quick on the penetration, just a reference point for you. We're at almost 17 points for Quest right now for household penetration. If you go back a couple of years, we're actually a little bit below 14%, right. So I think we've made tremendous -- part of our growth for that brand has been distribution but also household penetration and awareness. And I think we see that for the future as we look at Quest as well as an opportunity.

One housekeeping. So the balance sheet is in good shape. Your leverage ratio, I think, is below half a turn at this point. You paid down more debt in the quarter. What is the -- how are you prioritizing use of excess free cash flow going forward in the business? Thanks.

Yes, we had a great quarter, obviously, for cash generation and cash from operations that we continue to see that as a competitive advantage for us, and we'll continue to see that in the second half of the year. We spent a fair amount of time evaluating the best return of cash for our shareholders, debt pay down, share repurchases, central M&A opportunities, we'll continue to evaluate that for the second half of the year and do what we think is best for return to our shareholders.

Thank you.

Thank you. We have reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the floor back over to Geoff Tanner for closing remarks.

Yes, I just want to thank everyone for their participation on today's call, and we look forward to updating you on our third quarter results in late June. So have a great day.

Thank you. This does conclude today's teleconference. We appreciate your participation. You may disconnect at this time. Enjoy the rest of your day.