Welcome to Select Comfort's Q4 2016 Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed in listen-only mode until the question-and-answer session. Today's call is being recorded. If you have any objection, you may disconnect at this time. Now, I would like to introduce Mr. Dave Schwantes, Vice President of Finance and Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin.

Good afternoon and welcome to the Select Comfort Corporation fourth-quarter 2016 earnings conference call. Thank you for joining us. I am Dave Schwantes, Vice President of Finance and Investor Relations. With me today are Shelly Ibach, our President and CEO; and David Callen, our Senior Vice President and CFO. This telephone conference is being recorded and will be available on our website at sleepnumber.com. Please refer to the details in our news release to access the replay. Please also refer to our news release for a reconciliation of certain non-GAAP financial measures and supplemental financial information included in the news release or that may be discussed on this call. The primary purpose of this call is to discuss the results of the fiscal period just ended. However, our commentary and responses to your questions may include certain forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties outlined in our earnings news release and discussed in some detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and other periodic filings with the SEC. The company's actual future results may vary materially. I will now turn the call over to Shelly for her comments.

Thanks, Dave. Good afternoon and thank you for joining our fourth-quarter call. My SleepIQ score last night was 80. Today I will share highlights from our 2016 performance and our key growth drivers. We are very encouraged about the year ahead and excited to launch the most significant product innovation in our 30-year history, Sleep Number 360 smart beds. 2016 was a year of progress and recovery for our company. We completed our multi-year transformation, which strengthened our consumer innovation leadership and competitive advantages. The investments we've made were coordinated and paced to drive both brand demand and business leverage in a dynamic marketplace. In 2017, we expect greater leverage on lower sales growth rates, which is an important element for sustainable, profitable growth. Despite a worsening consumer environment beginning in the third quarter, net sales increased 8% for the year to $1.3 billion, and earnings per share increased 13% to $1.10. We had positive comparable store sales for the full year as we have for the past three years with a 1% comp increase and also generated seven percentage points of growth from new stores. In addition, we delivered 80 basis points of gross margin improvement for the full year. Still our 2016 earnings per share were $0.05 below the low end of our guidance range as sales fell short of our internal plans. We generated a 40% increase in operating cash flows in 2016 to a record $152 million, illustrating the strength of our business model. We also delivered a $71 million increase in free cash flows while increasing our store base 11% and returning $125 million in cash to shareholders through share repurchases. Full year ROIC of 12.2% exceeded our weighted average cost of capital by 54%. Turning to the fourth quarter, earnings per share were $0.25…

Thank you, Shelly. Though our Q4 top-line growth was below our target, we continued to deliver operating efficiencies, which were especially evident in our gross margin expansion and cash generation. Q4 net sales of $313 million grew 46% over a challenged Q4 of 2015 and were up mid single digits on a two-year basis, excluding the extra week of 2014. The composition of our Q4 sales growth came as expected with 50% growth in company-controlled units and 3% lower ARU. Comp store sales grew 34% in Q4. Notably, four points of our comp growth versus last year came from our online and phone sales business, which grew 91% in Q4 and was up 15% on a two-year basis. New stores contributed 12% of our growth in Q4. We opened 72 new stores in 2016, ending the year with 540 stores in 49 states. We look forward to leveraging our larger retail portfolio for greater productivity going forward, as we move toward 600 to 650 stores by 2019, complemented by strong online business. Our trailing 12-month average comp store sales normalized as expected to $2.4 million, essentially even with the prior year. We continue to target average sales per store of $3 million longer term. We see this as an important margin expansion opportunity of our strategy, since comp stores growth generates as much as 40% incremental four-wall profits. Our Q4 gross margin of 63% improved 680 basis points versus the prior year. After adjusting out the ERP-related challenges from last year, we delivered efficiencies throughout our manufacturing and logistics operations at slightly favorable product mix and saw 50 basis points of favorability from incentive compensation. And over two years, since Q4 of 2014, the 260-basis-point improvement shows the meaningful progress resulting from our initiatives. Our operating expenses were in line…

Thank you. Our first question is from Budd Bugatch from Raymond James. Your line is open.

Hello, Budd, are you there? Bobby Griffin - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.: Yes, this is Bobby filling in for Bud. I appreciate you guys taking my questions.

Hey, Bobby. Bobby Griffin - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.: Yeah, I was hoping just to get a little bit more color on how the quarter progressed, I guess, versus your expectations from the last time we spoke. Was it kind of centered around the election that surprised you, or was it kind of demand throughout the quarter was a little bit surprising, any more detail there that could help us frame how trends went through the quarter would be real helpful?

Yes, Bobby, the trends throughout the quarter were sluggish and choppy. I would describe them as worse from Q3, and there were some periods of strength like Black Friday and when we hold (27:16) of our contingencies, but these were certainly not sustainable before the quarter. And I would also highlight that post-election, we did see some improvement. But, again, it remains sluggish, difficult to move the consumer, and choppy. Importantly, flipping the calendar to January, we've experienced a very steady and more responsive consumer since the 1 of January. So from day in and day out, week after week within a market share period or outside of a market share period, and that's very encouraging as we think about the year ahead, and different than we've experienced in the last 12 months. Bobby Griffin - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.: Shelly, what do you think changed with flipping the calendar, did you guys do something different with your marketing message or targeting a little bit different, I mean, what exactly changed if it was sluggish throughout the fourth quarter, then all of a sudden, come January 1, things started to improve?

Yeah, well, I think we all experienced the GDP worsened in Q4. But then, as Q4 progressed, we started to see some of the more macro trends coming up, but the retail environment really did not follow until January. So consumer sentiment improved to a high point, but again, we didn't see that until we got into the month of January. For us internally, we progressed our media initiatives throughout the quarter. So we remained steady, we focused on continuing to learn and advance and strengthen our initiatives against the higher spend from the competitors, and we made progress all throughout the quarter and certainly have continued to here in the first quarter. So we're really excited as we think about launching the 360 later this year and how that will help us. Bobby Griffin - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.: All right. Appreciate it. And Dave, the tax rate this quarter looked like it was in – around 25%, 26%. Was there some moving parts in there to cause that?

Yeah, Bobby. There was an initiative we took on related to the BAM Labs acquisition. We had some NOLs that were trapped that we were able to take advantage of. Bobby Griffin - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.: Was that something you guys didn't realize back in October?

We had reserved against those NOLs, Bobby, and we did some homework and found a way to take advantage of them. Bobby Griffin - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.: Okay. And there's nothing – for 1Q and kind of moving forward, we should kind of think of more normalized type cadence for tax, right?

That's right. 34.5%, yeah. Bobby Griffin - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.: Okay. All right. I really appreciate the color. I will jump back in the queue. Best of luck going forward.

Thanks, Bobby.

Next question is from John Baugh with Stifel. Your line is open. John Baugh - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Thank you for taking my questions. Just curious, Shelly, if you had any thoughts about the developments last week between Mattress Firm and Tempur Sealy, and specific to you all, we don't know what's going to transpire there yet, I suppose. But if advertising spending for the Tempur brand specifically were to decline out in the future, how do you think that might impact you favorably or unfavorably?

Hey. Well, John, as we think about this change and other changes in the mattress marketplace right now, we really believe in the combination of our innovation and direct-to-consumer strategy. And this is why we've been investing in strengthening our competitive advantages, and we feel very strongly about being able to deliver superior shareholder value for the long-term with the strategy we are executing against. Then we'll continue to make some big progress this year with 360. Regarding the spend from Tempur or others, we've modeled our year ahead from media spending, assuming the elevated levels of media spend in the fourth quarter that we experienced, and that our initiatives are tracking against that level of spend. With fluctuation, we will adjust as we did in the fourth quarter. There was a step-up in the competitive spend from third quarter to fourth quarter, and we did adjust. We may not be able to combat everything within the quarter we're in, but we're going to find our way through it, especially having a vertical model like this, you can see things and react faster and more precisely, and we're making the progress and you can see that in early 2017. John Baugh - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Okay. And we go back to ERP and BAM, of course, they deleveraged and they were supposed to have leveraging positive. And then I guess we're going to do a little less store activity this year than last year and yet the flow-through is still fairly low in the low teens. I guess, we've now got additional costs with the logistics and the increased spend, I guess, on 360. Where are we in terms of accelerating that earnings growth, or do we just have a more competitive environment, and we've got to spend more on selling and marketing, and we're just not going to get the leverage that we thought, in particular to your longer range EPS target? Thank you.

Yeah, thanks, John. No, the Labs acquisition is absolutely expected to be accretive for us this year. We are very happy with that acquisition. It's been providing us support for the new products that we're coming to market with, as well as helping us take some costs out of our products. And so we definitely feel great about that acquisition. In terms of the flow-through rate at mid-teen while absorbing $10 million to $15 million of transition costs, I think we're talking about at the midpoint of our guidance an 18% increase of EPS inclusive of those costs and these costs are necessary to make the changes to the business that are going to position us for accelerated profits and growth. In terms of just where does this leave us and our trajectory toward our long-term plans, if you take the midpoint of the guidance of $1.30 and you add the $0.18 midpoint of the transition costs which are one time in nature, you're talking about a mid-30s (34:37), kind of, growth CAGR at the EPS line to achieve our 2019 guidance. That's directionally in line with where we were at the investor conference. And the growth drivers and profitability drivers are still in place, and we're leaning into them.

John, you also asked a question about the sales and marketing and if that was going to impact our expectations, and the answer would be no. We continue to expect media, as we've guided all along to be around 14% of sales. We're not counting on additional leverage to achieve the $2.75 from that particular line item. And the increased competitive spend – we continue to advance and pivot with our initiatives to operate more efficiently and effectively in that type of environment. You're seeing in 2017 a little pressure on the top line based on what we know of the consumer environment sitting here today. So, therefore, we're guiding to mid- to high-single-digit growth. And as we improve the consumer environment, we certainly have some great momentum upside from 360 and our other initiatives. John Baugh - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: And my final quick question would just be – you still have, I don't know, the exact percentage of mall-based stores and mall traffic has been horrible. I understand that it's worse at low-end malls than high-end malls. But is there any thought here as to how mall traffic is impacting you and what is sort of the longer-term real estate plan there? Thank you.

That's a great point, John, because we really saw an impact on Q4 that we hadn't seen before, frankly. Our mall base in 2014 a few years ago was 60% of our portfolio. At the end of the year, it was 47%. We saw a shift. We were expecting Q4 sales to be 90% of our Q3 sales, which was our historic norm. What we're seeing is the shift in traffic patterns related to mall versus non-mall stores impacted that sales alignment. And so we saw an 85% relationship, and we've adjusted our models accordingly. John Baugh - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Thanks. Good luck.

Thanks, John.

Next question is from Peter Keith with Piper Jaffray. Your line is open.

Hey. Thanks, everyone. Thanks for taking my questions. Just to follow up on John's question just around the flow-through and the outlook for the growth. I seem to recall that this past year had about $0.30 of ERP disruption in the first half of the year. So, if we were to add that to where you finished at $1.10, we are coming out at $1.40 of normalized earnings. So just thinking about the $1.48, David, that you gave as an adjusted EPS if we add back some of the expenses, it's really not a lot of EPS growth this year. So I'm wondering if there is something beyond the launches that's maybe restraining a bit of the growth opportunity off of what was a challenged 2016.

Right. Let's take a step back and talk about the elements. I highlighted that the net ERP impact was $0.18 for the year. The build-out of that is in Q1, the thing you are missing in your assumptions is that we benefited from a higher than normal backlog that we carried into 2016. It benefited our Q1 sales by about $21 million and $0.10 of EPS. In terms of trying to triangulate on the ERP impacts on the first half, those were estimates. And I would say that in the end, we are talking to them about $0.25 in ERP impact in Q1 and $0.03 in Q2. That's where we've landed, so the net impact of all of that is an $0.18 drag on 2016 earnings.

Okay. Thanks, David. And just to understand on ERPs, as we look on a go forward basis for benefits now, so you gave the gross margin guidance of 30 basis points to 50 basis points, and then there is some floor model clearance that's probably restraining that. What do you think, if you can isolate operational benefits from ERP and supply chain manufacturing, et cetera, what do you think that looks like for this coming year, and can we see that for a couple of years?

Yes, we highlighted in our Investor Day in November that we see an opportunity of about 200 basis point of gross margin improvement at least in that one example. We, frankly, are just tapping into some of these things. And there may be more. We're certainly looking for more. But the 30 basis points to 50 basis points of margin improvement backed on the 80 basis points we achieved this year. It's a pretty healthy rate, and that does have some, as I highlighted, some transition costs, and as well as some call it one-time pressure from closeout sales built-in during 2017. So we expect some of that to be relieved going into 2018 and beyond.

Okay, great. One last one for me. So you should generate a fair amount of free cash flow this year. Do you have share repurchases factored into the guidance at this point?

We do. We're assuming about $0.10 of benefit from share repurchases.

Okay. Thank you very much and good luck this year.

Thanks a lot.

Next question is from Brad Thomas from KeyBanc. Your line is open.

Thanks. Good afternoon, everybody.

Hey, Brad.

Hey, Brad.

I wanted to ask about the first quarter and any guidance you could give us in modeling the first quarter. David, as you alluded to, there is an element of a tough comparison and you being up against some deliveries that last year had slipped from 4Q into 1Q that might make bit of a tough sales comparison. On the other hand, there were a number of appeasement costs. Any color that you can give us on how to think about the first quarter, specifically.

Yes, definitely, Brad. How we're thinking about sales, first of all, is given the consumer environment that we've been operating in and what we've been seeing so far, we feel good about the mid-single-digit top line growth expectation on a year-over-year basis, all elements included. And then in terms of margin improvements, et cetera, the run rate that we saw in Q4 benefited from lower incentive compensation than we had expected by about 50 basis points. If you take that adjusted rate into Q1, you're probably in the neighborhood. And then overall, some of those transition costs that I highlighted are expected to flow through. You could spread it evenly throughout the year in your model. That's a reasonable approach.

Great. And then with respect to new stores, an interesting time where this growth rate that you've just wrapped up 2016 with one of the highest that we've seen out of the company. Could you just give us some color on how the new stores are performing? What level of cannibalization that they're driving to the comp? And what, if any, notable maybe earnings ramifications you have from having this front-end loaded year where the store growth is so strong at the start of the year?

Yes, so we're really pleased and we continue to be very pleased with our new store performance. It contributed seven points to our growth in 2016. But with the cannibalization, we've assumed that it impacted our comp growth by 1.5 points to 2 points.

And then, Brad, regarding the new stores, for the full year we will have the benefit of all the stores we opened in Q4, of course, for the full year so that we do expect maybe (43:28) four to five points of growth this year.

Great. Thank you so much.

You bet.

Our next question is from Jessica Mace with Nomura. Your line is open.

Hi, good afternoon.

Hey, Jessica.

My first question is about your forecast for unit growth next year of mid-single digits. The ARU that that implies is flat to positive. Can you give us a little color about what should go into that? Whether it's the closeouts you mentioned or how the pricing of the 360 bed will compare to your current lineup?

Yeah. Well, the unit growth, as I mentioned in my remarks, we are driving to bring more new customers to the brand. That's one of our key initiatives that we've been making progress against, and you'll see that in unit growth this year. We have guided that ARU would be fairly flat or down (44:30). That's one of our assumptions as we're looking ahead. At the same time, we're assuming a muted consumer environment and with some improvement there and/or momentum from 360, then we would certainly expect some ARU growth as well.

And for the long-term, of course, our guidance assumes we'll get growth for both, units and ARU.

All right, great. And then for the unit performance in the fourth quarter, is there a normalized or maybe a two-year growth number you can give us or maybe excluding the ERP impact from last year?

You know, Jessica, that's a little bit messy because the year before that had an extra week in it as well. So it's a little bit dicey to pull out all of the impacts.

All right, great.

But having growth in our units in Q4 was what we expected to have. It was planned. And you'll recall from last year that we leaned into ARU because putting units through the system when we're putting up the new ERP was a strain that we were trying to avoid. And so we leaned into ARU last year. So there is a directional relationship to why our ARU in Q4 this year was a bit lower than it was last year.

Makes sense. Thanks very much.

You bet.

Next question is from Keith Hughes with SunTrust. Your line is open.

Thank you. Couple questions. I guess, first, I'm a little confused on the last answer. I think I'd heard kind of mid-single digits in terms of unit growth for the year, but low-single digits in terms of same-store sales. That would imply kind of negative ticket. Is that right or do I have the numbers wrong?

Keith, can you say that one more time? Sorry.

Yeah. So is the expectation for the year that units are going to grow mid-single digits and that same-store sales would be up low-single digits, implying kind of a negative ticket for the year?

No, we're assuming ARU will be about flat.

Okay. But is that correct, units will be up mid-single digits and same-store sales up low-single digits?

Yeah, we're expecting the growth next year to come from units, not from ARU.

Okay.

And we're expecting most of the growth to come from new stores and comp stores to deliver low-single digit.

Okay. So what's the delta between the two that would get the same-store sales to the low-single digits?

It doesn't imply anything regarding our comp unit growth if that's what you're getting at, Keith.

Okay. So the mid-single-digit number is not a comp unit. That's total units across the store...

That's total units. That's...

Okay. Well, that's the offset. Okay, that's what confused me.

Okay. Got it.

Looking at the launch for the year, so it was a major launch for you. When it's said and done, will the number of SKUs available be roughly the same as what we have today, just different SKUs. Is that how it'll work out?

Yeah. The SKUs will be similar but different, as you mentioned. So we'll have consistency in our series with the C Series, the Performance Series, and the Innovation Series. But we did close out our x12, so we will have one less bed overall. We have seven in our new lineup.

And...

But one of the advantages, Keith, that we highlighted during the investor call is the design of the 360 beds in the common parts across the line.

Right.

So there's some advantages on that side.

Okay. In terms of pricing, is the expectation for the pricing to come in similar to the models they're replacing?

Yeah, we're still working on our pricing, research, and studies. Right now we're just completing them, so we haven't communicated exactly how we're going to move forward. There is incredible value. We see that and it's finding that right balance between driving and optimizing the demand along with the pricing power we have with exclusive distribution and the innovation.

Okay. In terms of the process for you in terms of launching, how long does it take once you've made the decision to put the bed in the stores to clear out the space, get the inventory in place to be able to ship? How many weeks, months does that take?

For us, because of our primarily make-to-order business model, we can make those changes quite quickly, especially compared to a traditional wholesale to mattress retailer. So it's a matter of weeks.

Okay. Thank you.

Our next question is from Seth Basham with Wedbush Securities. Your line is open.

Thanks a lot and good afternoon.

Hi, Seth.

My first question is just understanding the guidance for the first quarter a little bit more clearly. You're looking for comps in flattish to slightly down. I guess if you're implying about 10% average store growth and contribution from that of about 60% on guidance for mid-single-digit sales growth. Is that the way to think about it?

It is. Yeah.

Okay. And the confidence of seeing an improved comp rate through the year at this point in time is driven by what again?

So, again, as we launch our new product line and have closeout sales of our legacy products, we've had some experience with this in the past, and we believe that there's an opportunity for us to grow higher sales in the last three quarters of the year as a result.

And, Seth, I would also add, just what we've seen thus far in 2017 with the steadiness of the consumer behavior, the effectiveness of our marketing initiatives. And then as we get into 360, our ability to market to our loyal insider base, we have a proven formula there that has worked successfully for us through other product launches.

All right. This is quite a big innovation, quite a big launch that you have planned. And I guess you're not baking in too much of an improvement in your sales rate from this product. Is that just out of conservatism?

It is, Seth. Considering the environment that we were a little surprised with in Q4, certainly taking onboard what we're seeing and the steadiness that we're seeing since January 1, but giving ourselves room to be able to perform in the consumer environment that's more muted.

Okay. With all these innovations in the 360 bed, why not take the price up? Where is your pricing power? How are you thinking about that dynamic?

Yeah, we haven't said that we're not taking it up. Our prices will be similar, so directionally similar to all-in if you add a number of features today. However, we are aware of the value. We see the pricing power of our innovation strategy and exclusive distribution, and it's matching that with creating a level of demand. We have a phased approach to our 360 launch and this is where the nimbleness of the vertical model is very helpful as well. So we'll have the additional benefit of some in-market real-time testing as well.

Got it. Okay. So when you're thinking about the ARU guidance of flat for 2017, there may be some pricing on the mattresses, but you're expecting a change or a decline in attachments of other products? Is that the way to think about it?

Well, as you think about ARU, the ARU assumption we have in right now doesn't assume much for pricing. So maybe that would be a good way to answer your question.

Got it. Okay. And last question is just on the it bed and the Kids bed, other innovations you guys have had in the last two years. Can you give us a little bit more insight into how you're thinking about those contributing to your growth in 2017?

Yeah. Our primary focus is definitely on 360, which is our core, our profitable core, and we'll have the biggest impact. Both the it bed and Kids we see as adjacent brands, adjacent markets to our core business. They take a backseat to the core. They've helped us advance many aspects of our business, and we do continue to have a robust pipeline for innovation and ways to grow our sales in the future between those adjacencies as well as international.

Got it. And can you give us an update on the tests that you guys ran with the it bed in 50 stores? Where are you with that and plans for 2017?

Yeah. First of all, the good news is that the it bed is attracting an incremental customer to our brand. The 25- to 34-year-old tech savvy have a similar income level, a little higher income level than we had anticipated, but it's certainly additive to the core brand. We are seeing some of the customers move into – perhaps about 30% of the customers moving into the overall Sleep Number brand, but they're still coming in through the it bed brand. And the stores we've been showing the it bed in, I would say that the sample is still in a place where we're not seeing a significant insight that would tell us to make a change there. So it's early. We still are benefiting from learning, and we're going to continue to prioritize 360 this year, but focus on a limited number of large markets with the it bed. We will set in a few more stores.

Got it. Thank you so much.

Thank you.

Our next question is from Curtis Nagle of Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Your line is open.

Thank you very much for taking the question and good afternoon. Just a quick question, if you could give a little more detail on average ticket for 4Q. I guess what was driving it down a little bit, was it primarily promotion, the compare, or perhaps mix, maybe something else?

Yeah, hey, Curtis, I just want to make sure that we're clear. When we talk about ARU, it is not ticket. It's our average revenue per unit. So that's a very different metric than ticket. So we don't actually disclose an average ticket. When we talk about ARU being down 3% on a quarterly basis over prior year quarter, the biggest driver there was really that, ahead of the ERP, we leaned into ARU, meaning that it was not prudent for us to push any more units through the system than necessary in our Q4 as we were launching our ERP.

In 2016.

That was in Q4 2016 last year. So our ARU is higher in last year as a result, and the year-over-year comparisons came down a little bit. In total for the year, 2016 was flat to the prior year ARU.

Understood. And then just thinking about I guess store growth and your target by 2019, would it imply a reacceleration in I guess 2018 to 2019, or I mean, how should we think about that?

We're on track with the guidance we have provided and still continue to expect between 600 and 650 stores by 2019.

Okay. And then if I can just slip one last one in. Your expectations for inventory, I guess, by store for the year?

Well, we don't typically provide that, Curtis, but I do talk about inventory in total. We ended the year with $75 million. During the middle part of the year when we were in the bulk of the transition and the launch of the product line, we'll probably have some elevated inventory maybe between $5 million and $10 million, and then expect to be close to where we are now by the time we get to the end of the year.

Very good. Thanks very much for taking the questions.

You bet.

Thank you, Curtis.

Our next question is from Michael Lasser with UBS. Your line is open.

Good evening. Thanks a lot for taking my question. You indicated that you expect to see 50 basis points of leverage from media. Where is that coming from in light of the rising customer acquisition costs and the spend you're going to be making for the new launches and the existing business?

Yes, Michael, we summarized three key initiatives at our Investor Day that we continue to work against and make progress against. One is our overall focus on our loyal insiders for repeat and referral business, which is our most efficient form of media. Also, as we advance our internal buying capabilities and this helps us with both agility and efficiency which ultimately gets to the effectiveness. We've been focused on search capabilities in this area, and we're expanding that now to video and social as well, all internal, which allows us to be able to move much quicker and more efficiently as we move forward. And this is where a source of escalating cost is certainly in search on basic terms. And then finally, some initiatives where we've been advancing against around our TV, find and efficiency in that area?

Okay. My other question is on the overlap that you have with Tempur-Pedic. What does your research show on the frequency that customers shop both your products and Tempur-Pedic? How often are you both in the consideration set?

We haven't shared the specific research, but certainly we both offer premium products to consumers that are differentiated. Ours from a differentiation includes adjustable air and, of course, the SleepIQ technology. So we have been very progressive in our innovation agenda with our products and are delivering increased sleep benefits.

Okay. And if there is a dislocation in the market, would it make sense to increase your advertising in order to attempt to capitalize on that dislocation?

Michael, we will compete aggressively with all of our assets in this marketplace. We will compete aggressively.

Understood. Good luck.

Yeah, thank you.

Thanks very much.

I see no questions at this time. I will turn the call over back to the company for any closing remarks.

Thank you for joining us today. We look forward to discussing our first quarter 2017 performance with you in a couple of months. Sleep well and dream big.

That concludes today's conference. You may disconnect at this time. Thank you for your participation.