Good morning, and welcome to the Sensata Technologies Holding N.V. Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2015 Earnings Webcast. At this time, I would like to inform you that this webcast is being recorded and that all participants are in a listen-only mode. For opening remarks and introductions, I'd like to turn the call over to Jacob Sayer, Vice President of Treasury and Investor Relations. Mr. Sayer, you may begin.

Thank you, Lauren, and good morning everyone. Earlier today, Sensata issued a press release describing our financial performance for the fourth quarter and full year 2015. You may obtain a copy from the Investor Relations section of our website at sensata.com. To help provide more color and detail on our business, we'll be referring to a slide deck during the course of today's call. These slides are available in the live webcast and the copy is also available on our IR website. A replay of the webcast will also be available in the Investor Relations section of our website. Today's discussion will contain forward-looking statements based on the business environment as we currently see it and, as such, does include certain risks and uncertainties. Please refer to our press release and our 10-Q and 10-K filings for more information on the specific risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the projections discussed on today's call. In addition to U.S. GAAP reporting, we report certain financial measures that do not conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We believe these non-GAAP measures enhance the understanding of our performance. Reconciliations between these GAAP and non-GAAP measures are included in the tables found in today's press release, as well as in the Investor Relations section of our website under Financial Reports. Comments made during today's call will primarily refer to our non-GAAP financial results. On the call, with me today, are Martha Sullivan, Sensata's President and Chief Executive Officer; and Paul Vasington, Sensata's Chief Financial Officer. We'll hold questions until after our prepared remarks, but if you'd like to get in the queue, please do so by pressing the star key followed by the number one. I'll now turn the call over to Martha to review highlights from the quarter and trends in the end markets that we serve. Martha?

Thank you, Jacob, and thank you all for joining our fourth quarter and full year 2015 conference call. Sensata's strategic goal is to win in sensing and, by doing so, to continue to drive long-term value creation for our shareholders. This year, we delivered double-digit revenue and earnings growth. The value creation story at Sensata is intact and we delivered against many strategic goals during 2015. During 2015, we delivered 23% revenue growth and 16% adjusted earnings per share growth driven primarily by acquisitions. Over the past five years, Sensata has grown revenue at a 14% compound average growth rate. In businesses where content is an underlying growth driver, we grew organically faster than our end markets in 2015, thanks to new sensors launched during the course of the year. We are expanding our end market exposure beyond automotives into heavy vehicle, industrial and aerospace sensing end markets. OEM customers in these markets are experiencing the same need for sensing solutions as in the automotive space. With the acquisition of the sensing businesses of CST, Sensata will be a primary supplier of their sensor needs. We continue to improve manufacturing productivity and leverage investments in technology and infrastructure to raise margins. In the core business, which now reflects all prior acquisitions, except DeltaTech, Schrader and CST, our adjusted net income margin was 19.7% in 2015 and 21% in the fourth quarter. Looking back on 2015, there was more end market volatility than we or many others expected during the year. We did not anticipate the degree of the slowdown in China or the slowdown in commodity prices that significantly impacted heavy vehicle markets during the course of the year. This market volatility pushed us off plan for what we anticipated early in 2015. As we look to 2016, we expect…

Thank you, Martha. Key highlights for the fourth quarter, as shown on slide eight, include: net revenue was $726 million, an increase of 3% from the fourth quarter of 2014. Of this, acquisitions contributed 5.9%. Organic revenue was down 20 basis points and changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily the euro, represented a net revenue headwind of 2.7%. Fourth quarter adjusted EBITDA was $178 million or 24.5% of net revenue. Adjusted EBIT was $155 million or 21.3% of net revenue. Adjusted net income was $113 million or $0.66 per diluted share in line with expectations. Integration costs were $8.8 million, including CST. Compared to the prior year, profitability indices are higher in the fourth quarter, primarily due to productivity gains and lower integration spend. Adjusted net income margin in the core business, which include all prior acquisitions except DeltaTech, Schrader and CST, was 21% in the fourth quarter, up 110 basis points from the prior year, evidence of our ability to deliver A&I margins at a targeted range of 20% to 23%. Restructuring and special charges of $10.7 million, added back to our non-GAAP numbers in the fourth quarter, were primarily related to improving operating efficiency, tightly aligning our cost structure and business model to end market performance and exiting non-competitive, non-sensing businesses. These charges appear in the cost of revenue, selling, general and administrative and restructuring and special charges lines in the GAAP income statement. Financing and other transaction costs of $14.4 million were added back to our non-GAAP numbers. These costs were associated with the acquisition of CST and the related debt financing. Cash taxes in the fourth quarter were approximately $10.5 million or 6.8% of adjusted earnings before interest and tax. During the quarter, we recorded deferred income tax benefit of $185 million that was excluded…

Thank you, Mr. Vasington. Your first question comes from the line of Wamsi Mohan from Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please go ahead.

Hi. Yes. Thank you. Martha, Paul, thanks also for all the additional details in your guidance and slide deck. It's really helpful. I wanted to ask you about content growth in 2016, it sounded, from Paul's comments, that it might be slowing down a little bit, maybe relative to 2015. Can you address maybe what the key drivers here are?

Sure, Wamsi. It's not significantly slower. We finished at about 8% in 2015. We think we're going to be in the 6% to 7% in 2016. Just keep in mind, our NBO wins and the launches of new products do not come in a linear fashion. Sometimes they're strong renews of regulations, sometimes it's just the take rates on particular optionality in the vehicles. So there is no specific, sort of, headwind to content growth at this point. We think we've got a good plan in – and a good line of sight to achieving that plan.

Okay. Thanks, Martha. And then, as you look at your Sensing Solutions business organic growth guidance of roughly flat for the year, what are you expecting to see there as you go through 2016? It looks like you exited 4Q at a down 10% organic growth rate, so just wondering how you're thinking about that progression as you go through the year.

Sure. Yeah. We definitely think we're going to continue to see the declines in the early part of the year, part of that is just the comps that we have in the second half of that year. Another element is that we continue to see the China PMI erode. So, we think we have that captured correctly, but those are the primary puts and takes.

Okay. And if I could ask one more, it looks like, from your commentary about incremental EPS growth from M&A, if you are roughly flat to slightly down on integration costs, is the primary benefit all accruing from synergies? And is it fair to say that your expectation of earnings contribution from M&A has also de-rated somewhat given the weaker macro trends? Thank you.

Yeah. No. I would say our accretion expectations have not de-rated. Your first question, I think, the assumption there is correct that, with about similar spend and integration cost, it really is that we are seeing the margin expansion in those business and they're tied to very specific actions as we profiled here in the deck. So, no, it's not the case that our accretion expectations are down.

And I would just add, Wamsi, there's a bit of a mix change. We've got more integration spend on CST, and less so on DeltaTech and Schrader announced by – and you can see in the deck where you can see the nice EPS accretion for DeltaTech and Schrader in 2016.

Thanks, Paul.

Your next question comes from the line of Matt Sheerin from Stifel. Please go ahead.

Yes. Thanks. Good morning. Just wanted to ask some questions regarding the FX headwinds. It looks like based on the EPS guide, there was about 100 basis point headwind on operating margin or EBIT margins and which would imply kind of flattish organic year-over-year, yet your guidance for the first quarter is certainly weaker than that implying that you're going to end the year at a higher level in both segments. So could you give us a little bit more color? Am I right on that? And what is the operating margin look like going into fiscal 2017?

Well, I would say, in terms of the organic growth, if you take our guidance, and you add $0.19 to that you'll see that organic growth is going to be quite significant in 2016. Although, I think, having a – by a 1% impact on revenue is the right, is about the right range. As we get into 2017, we'll see a little more FX headwind, just given where – given our hedging program and rates are, but I think the business continues to drive operating efficiency and many of the actions we've taken to align our cost structure will deliver increased EPS in 2017 and I feel very good about the productivity and the expansion of margins as we go into 2017 from 2016.

Okay. Well, yeah, I mean, obviously, at your Analyst Day last year, you talked about significantly higher margin targets, certainly not near term, but we're still a long way from that. So could we be looking at kind of 22% to 23% range as we exit 2017? Is that...

Well, I don't want to guide on 2017. But I think, our long-term framework is 20% to 23%. You can see the core businesses now delivering at that range as the integrations continue to increase in value as we integrate and drive cost out and improve their operating efficiencies. We will see them start to come up with Sensata levels in terms of A&I margins.

Okay. And then, just on M&A, obviously, your debt is up a bit. It sounds like you're managing the integrations well and generating cash. So what you'll be thinking this year? I mean, are you sort of in the blocking and tackling mode in terms of handling these integrations, let alone you are dealing with some of the macro headwinds that haven't gone away yet?

Yeah. I think we certainly are very focused on execution when it comes the integrations. We are also quite mindful of the macro environment. We are not anticipating any extreme downturn in 2016, but we actually have done scenario planning and understand how we would respond to a typical downturn. So a lot of focus on blocking and tackling in managing our earnings performance on the business.

Okay. Thanks very much.

Your next question comes from the line of Mark Delaney from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Yes. Good morning and thanks very much for taking the questions. First question is on a longer term goal to get $3.8 billion of revenue by 2017. Just given some of the factors especially on the macro that you talked about in prepared remarks, using the midpoint of your 2016 revenue guidance, to get to 2017 $3.8 billion, you need to grow, I think, almost 19%, is that still a number that we can think about for 2017? Or is that too optimistic at this point?

Yeah. Look, I think that the doubling of the business over five years was an important goal for us to set, primarily for our internal team and then to share with our other stakeholders. The intent there was really to drive a fundamental change in the pillars of our growth and primarily that could drive that the opportunity around M&A and to give everybody a sense of scale for what we would be talking about. If you look at the 14% compounded growth rate on the top line that that strategy has delivered over the past five years, we're feeling pretty good about directionally having laid out some ambitious plans. Having said that, we're now at $3 billion and $3.8 billion like religion and so we don't feel forced to go out and acquire to hit a number. We think, the pipeline continues to be really interesting, really aligned to our overall strategy in sensing. At this point, that number is probably a bit ambitious in that timeframe, but keep in mind what really wasn't indented to do and I think is delivered on that.

That's very helpful, Martha. And then, for a follow-up question, by my math, the midpoint of the 2016 guidance implies that adjusted net income margins are actually down a little bit year-over-year and you got to understand FX is a headwind, but maybe you can just talk about are there any other factors that are weighing on the margins in 2016 versus 2015 beyond FX?

Yeah. I think one of the biggest margin headwinds will be CST, given the fact they're contributing $300 million of – $300 million plus of revenue and slightly accretive $0.02 to $0.04. One thing about the P&L itself, we continue to maintain our – and manage our cost very effectively. We expect our productivity initiatives around manufacturing and material things that offset price. So there're a lot of positive levers we're going to continue to drive margins forward.

Thank you very much.

Your next question comes from the line of Ambrish Srivastava from BMO. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thank you very much. Martha, you've been through several downturns. There is a big concern out there regarding SAAR, worldwide SAAR. And I apologize, if I missed it on the deck, which by the way, Jacob, thank you, very helpful. What is your expectation for worldwide SAAR for light vehicles and what are you seeing versus what we saw in the past – and I'll bring up the 2008 downturn. And then I had a quick follow-up please.

Sure. So generally speaking, we are still using third-party forecasters to call production rates and, keep in mind, production is really what drives our overall growth. Having said that, I'll tell you we've discounted in two areas from third-party forecast. One of those is China and the other is North America. So, at this point, we don't think we're going to see more acceleration in growth in North America. We're anticipating about a 2% production improvement and if you look at where inventories land versus where there is strong demand in North America, we think that that's appropriate. So, that's below, for example, where IHS would have called it. To your question about what are we seeing real time on the ground and in our backlog, honestly, we're not seeing anything that feels like a downturn. And so, when we look at sort of the signs on the past vehicle inventories, fill rates, conversations with our customers, we're not feeling the notion that we are going to see a significant downturn, but we think it's important to be prudent in our planning, and now, we'll keep a close eye on that.

Okay. Thank you. And then, HVOR and you're not the only one it's caught everybody by surprise. Can you help us understand where we are – if you look at peak versus peak, where is your HVOR business? And then, if you just compare it to the last – I'm trying to look at peak and trough and a quick relate – actually not related, a price decline, is there something going on this year on the annual price decline that you see versus in the past? Thank you very much, Martha.

Sure. So, on the HVOR front, keep in mind, it traditionally has not been a huge part of our overall business. And so, we deliberately have gone out to gain sensor wins and make that a more meaningful part of the overall Sensata landscape, just because it does have nice content growth available to it over the long-term. And so, relative to peak to trough, it's a little difficult for us to answer that just based on our own profile of revenue. It definitely feels like we're still troughing, and so you can see that where we've called out the overall growth rate for that revenue in our business now being significantly down over the year. We're still doing a bit better than end market just given the content growth that's available to us. And then, what the second question was?

Price decline.

I'm sorry. So, on the price decline piece, no, the actual price declines are very similar to our phenomena in the past. There is one element of that that I would point out as we move into 2016. We are very often in the mode of introducing next-gen products to the marketplace. And often, we'll introduce those products at higher performance, lower cost and better margins for Sensata. So, in some cases, what's falling into that pricing line is actually a new next-gen product that, by design, is being delivered to customer at lower prices.

Thank you very much. Good luck.

Your next question comes from the line of Craig Hettenbach from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Yes. Thanks, and thanks for the color in the slide deck and details. Just a question on autos, specifically to China, there's been a sharp snapback in production in the back half for of the year, a lot of incentives in place. Just want to get a sense of kind of your visibility there, is that something that can sustain the snapback? And then, Europe wasn't mentioned, is that kind of a slow but steady kind of grind-up still in the European market?

Yes. On the China piece, we felt a snapback, had expected some of that and that did come back strong. We are being mindful of the fact that vehicle inventories are a bit high in China as well. And so, to my earlier remarks, we discounted third-party view on production growth in China to a bit. So we're now looking at this being a very low-single digit production growth year in China. And that's just a combination of looking at inventories, recognizing there is a snapback, but being mindful of where that could land throughout the year. On the Europe front, Europe has been on a cadence of steady improvement, now for the past couple of years and that feels good, that continues. We see that playing out in our backlog as well.

Got it. And just as a follow-up on the OpEx side, understand you have cost initiatives through the acquisitions to help improve margins, but on the core business, how are you thinking about just managing in this type of backdrop? I know you guys typically do a good job on kind of the variable expense side, how are you managing the business?

Like I said before, and you can see it in the slide deck when we talked about where we're optimizing our manufacturing network, we're moving manufacturing from high cost locations into our existing sites, where we've a lot of capacity and the ability to streamline those processes. We're restructuring business models, where we're not seeing the end market performance. We are streamlining the operating structure that supports those end markets. We're exiting businesses that are unprofitable. And we continue to improve our process. We continue to hone our operating systems and get more efficiency, more productivity out of the assets and the people that we have.

Got it. Thanks, Paul.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Shawn Harrison from Longbow. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning. Wanted to dig into the dynamic of expanding the buyback, now back to $250 million, with the goal of deleveraging for the year. And can you or do you plan to implement the buyback as 2016 progresses while also be a – while also taking down leverage to the target goal?

Look, we think it's really important in this environment to make sure that we have all optionality available to us to create returns for our shareholders. Our practice is to share with you any buybacks that we do after the fact at the end of the quarter, any of that consideration though is really going to be balanced against the strategic needs of the business, our M&A pipeline and our commitment to return to leverage ratios over time that we think are aligned with capital market appetite.

Okay. I guess that's understandable. Digging into the HVOR business a little bit more, I think you said you thought it was close to troughing, but what do you have for heavy trucks declining in 2016 baked into the forecast?

I mean, well over 20%.

Okay. And just one last clarification, I guess...

Just one clarification, that's North America and that's really Class 8.

Class 8 North America. Europe, what you have that as? Flattish?

Europe up a little bit.

Okay.

Europe to be up a little as they're in a different cycle.

Got you.

business compared to North American business.

And then one clarification, interest expense run rate at the beginning of the year and maybe a – the total number of interest expense for 2016?

I think we're in ....

It's going to be higher and would be in the $190 million range for the year.

Sorry? What was that, $190 million?

$190 million for the full year.

Okay. Thanks, Jacob.

Your next question comes from the line of Rich Kwas from Wells Fargo Securities. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning. Again thanks for the presentation, helpful. Martha, in terms of the longer term outlook, in terms of what you provided last year at the Investor Day, is high-single digit organic growth still viable for this business in a normalized economic environment? I mean, how you thinking about that? I didn't see that on the last slide. I know that was part of the tenant – I mean, part of the pillars of the longer term outlook, so if you could just provide some additional color on that longer term.

Sure. The way we're thinking about that, you can – if you go back to Investor Day, I think our perspective on the underlying secular growth has not changed. And so trying to give you some color on what drives that and why we're confident in that. Our thesis has been that, over time, markets will move up and markets will move down and you really – it really will be that secular growth piece that drives the overall. I think the learnings out of 2015 are really take the time to understand what time is it in the end markets where we play, and by design, we're expanding those end markets. So we're taking the time to really understand the cycles and to understand how that overlays and we'll share those perspectives with you as they continue to develop. So I think the most important piece of this, which is the secular growth driven by growing sensor content, has not changed.

Okay. So the bottom line is, there is a cyclicality of the business that you're factoring that in, in terms of the end market cyclicality?

Yeah. And the point – the thing that I would point out is unlike folks that are all-in in automotive, we're increasing the exposure so that there is different cycles that are phase shifted and I think that strengthens the overall business model.

Yes. Understood. And then, just on – noticed on the Schrader business, the TPMS business, so that's flat now versus the market growth, I know, I think you mentioned – Paul, you might have mentioned price down, but I mean what's – is that business going to grow at a production growth level on a longer term basis? I know that you've got potentially China regulation as a lever out in the future, but how do we think about that from a growth standpoint, normalized?

Yeah. I think you have the first piece of it correctly. So now we're entering the year, we look at price downs, we look at automotive production rates that are globally 2% up and where some of that growth is, there is not TPMS today, so we're giving you a line of sight to how that plays out into the year. Longer term, there is growth in TPMS and China is an important element of it. China standards continue to develop. We are on track with our thesis of that having an impact in 2019, but in addition to China, we're seeing some exciting developments around the use of tire pressure sensing, for example, in the commercial truck space, in trailers and even in places like motorcycles. So, we are very optimistic about content growth in TPMS, at the same time, we've been very clear that that growth is episodic around regulation and so, over the next couple of years, we would expect it to move with production rate.

Okay. That's helpful. And then two last quick ones. What's the assumption for China PMI within the guidance, underpinning the guidance for the year? And then, Paul, for FX for 2017, if spot rates stay where they are, is there any lift on a year-over-year basis as we think about 2017? Or is it kind of just, unless rates go up or the dollar softens, there is really not going to be much benefits in 2017, but you're – it kind of a neutral?

Actually, 2017 will be down, because – we had benefits of the hedges that we put on in 2014, 2015, some of it got benefited 2016, so we've been on this steady decline. The impact will be far less than we're going to see in 2016, but more likely than not, we'll have a little more FX headwind in 2017.

Okay.

Significantly different....

Than what we're seeing....

...the 2015 to 2016 headwind that we're facing today.

Okay, low...

If you got this two year hedging, we're hedging two years out at time, so...

Right. So it's lower headwind than this year?

Still a little bit down.

Yeah. On the PMI, we're not predicting a strong recovery on PMI. We're not predicting a significant declines on the very low levels where it is right now. And we have factored in some of the recent declines into our guide.

Okay. Thank you. Appreciate it.

Your next question comes from the line of Samik Chatterjee from JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Hi, Martha. Hi, Paul. So just on – just wanted to come back to the discussion about content growth. And, if you could put that in context of the cadence of regulations you see on the light and heavy vehicle side in 2016 and beyond, because when we talk to some of the auto suppliers, particularly on the emission side, they talk about 2016 being like a transition year. So maybe you can share your thoughts on that.

We do have content growth expectations on 2016 for the truck, despite really weak end markets. We are seeing a little bit of push-out in some of those programs, which we are used to seeing in a very down market. And so, we're not anticipating that folks are going to comply any earlier than regulation requires them to just given the state of the overall industry. So if you look over the next couple of years, that is an important content driver.

Okay. Great. And so, just going to tire pressure monitoring mix, and I noticed recently another manufacturer, Hampton, I believe, announced that they're opening a facility in China in 2016. And just wondering if there's been a change in expectations for the industry about the timeline of the regulation coming through that could have triggered that. Any updates on that front?

No. Our expectations on regulation have not changed. One development at Sensata I'd point you to is that we've launched tire pressure sensing in China actually last year and are continuing to load that location. And we're continuing to get design wins on TPMS in China. So our expectations for a ramp in China in 2019-ish have not changed.

Thanks, Samik.

Great. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Amit Daryanani from RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Yes. Thanks. Just a couple of questions from me. One, Paul, could you just talk about the free cash flow expectation in 2016? I think you're talking about up 3%, 4% at midpoint. I'm a little surprised by that because I thought free cash flow was depressed because CapEx was ahead of plan, and you have a lot of one-time charges that were flowing through it, so just talk about what are you thinking about 2016 free cash flow, what's your CapEx assumption there?

So the CapEx assumption will be in the $150 million to $175 million range for 2016.

And then, what...

And this year – and in 2015, we did have a fair amount of funding of restructuring and pre-acquisition thing – settlements that we disclosed. Next year, we've taken a bunch of restructuring in this year. We'll be funding some of those programs next year as well. We're going to have higher earnings and so that will certainly help the free cash flow. The CapEx will be down a little bit. We'll have these funding items as well. So I think the $375 million makes a lot of sense in terms of a midpoint of guide for 2016.

At the same time, I would just point to some improvements that we've made on our working capital, so the team is doing a great job of bringing that down on a continuous improvement basis.

Fair enough. And then, I guess, just from the CST benefits, you are expecting of $0.08 to $0.10, does that factor in $15 million, $20 million of integration charges as well so that numbers kind of would be bigger on a gross basis effectively?

So make sure that we understand that that chart shows incremental earnings per share, so it's $0.02 to $0.04 earnings per share in 2016 versus a $0.06 loss in Q4 of 2015, so it's a gross change. With that said, integration, we are going to be integrating the business that we're going to spend – of the $20 million or so that we talked about – $15 million or $20 million we talked about in 2016, CST will represent about a third to half of that.

And so the $0.02 does include integration.

It does include – yes, it includes integration, it also includes the impact of interest expense on the debt that was acquired to fund the purchase of CST.

Got it. And just, I guess, finally, as you look at capital allocation in 2016, it's a bigger priority for you guys to further deleverage your balance sheet or actually do buybacks at more opportune time. Just which one would you guys weigh more heavily as you go through 2016?

Look, I'm going to be really consistent on this point. We will look at balancing against all three of the priorities that I talked about previously.

Okay. I hop off the queue.

Thanks, Amit.

Your next question comes from the line of Jim Suva from Citi. Please go ahead.

Thank you. You mentioned a little bit about Schrader and the tire pressure industry of kind of what is going through and waiting for China and things like that. Can you help us remind us about what your expectations are or maybe the agreed upon legislation of when that should come out to spur growth? And then on the same topic of – I believe that you guys were talking about going into the aftermarket tire pressure business, is that still the case? And what's the status of that because I'm just triangulate around what type of growth you're expecting for that business and timeline of the cadence?

Yes. So we have consistently talked about regulation developing in China. We think that is the largest growth driver of TPMS. And our expectation is that we'll see that early compliance in and around 2019. So we're carefully watching how standards are developing. We're carefully watching the rule making. And what will be important in China is the actual enforcement of that regulation. At the same time, we see other applications that are new, new uses of tire pressure sensing. So that includes commercial truck. For the first time, looking at this as potentially regulatory area. It includes consumer interest and things like trailers, from a safety perspective, as well. So, while China is an important growth driver, it's not the only growth driver.

Okay. And then a follow-up on that. You didn't mention aftermarket and so I didn't know if that has changed or not.

I'm sorry, Jim. My bad. So that I think a really interesting space. We have an aftermarket position today. It represents, I believe, about 20% of that overall business. When you look at how aftermarket grows, it's a function of what is the installed base of that feature in the overall park or the overall fleet that's out there today. And so, given that, for example, Europe mandates on tire pressure are only now a year old. So we have a small part of what's already out there in the field with tire pressure sensors on it. So, each year, that installed base is going to grow. And as it grows, the demand for aftermarket sensors will grow as well. So we do think it's an important component. It's one more thing that drives the growth of tire pressure sensing. So, thanks for the question, and thanks for reminding me. I appreciate that. Having said that, we can think over the next – in 2016 and in 2017, we'll probably see tire pressure sensing content growth will be there, but not at the overall Sensata average.

Great. Thank you so much for the details.

Your next question comes from the line of Joe O'Dea from Vertical Research Partners. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning. First on the incremental $0.20 of earnings contribution from acquisitions in 2017, is that primarily a function of lower integration costs or does it also involve any acceleration from previous timelines and some of the actions that you had for marching margins higher?

I think it's an all-in number. It includes lower integration costs, it includes operating efficiencies and synergies that are being created as we integrate the business and reflects our underlying operating performance. So it's an all-in number for those businesses.

Okay. But versus, sort of, prior timelines that you would have laid out for Schrader and CST, in particular, that doesn't contemplate pulling anything forward really?

No, I think CST is consistent in terms of what we had said about accretion and we did pull forward some of the integration costs into Q4 of 2015 and that's reflective in the integration costs that we report out here of $8.8 million in Q4. As related to Schrader, all along we've been talking about how Schrader has performed extremely well above expectations and so we're very excited about the progress that is going on there and that carries into 2016 and beyond.

I think we don't have the view that the ultimate accretion is higher than what we would have laid out. The pace of accretion has been better, for example, in the case of Schrader.

Yeah. Okay. And then, on slide six, in the $350 million to $400 million revenue opportunity in four years to five years, I know that's not a – I know it's a representation of sort of a full picture of what's out there. But could you talk a little bit about the cadence of that? I mean, Martha, you mentioned that that's not a linear kind of trajectory. And then, how does that generally get affected, if you do see lower market volumes? Is it really just a function of lower unit volumes or is it also sort of a compounded effect of some things get delayed?

Yeah. Good question. So, on six, what we try to lay out here is take out the end market impacts. So, when we're talking about the growth rate of these applications, the first thing to understand is there is no vehicle growth in that and there is no vehicle decline in that. So it's the standalone installation of these applications into the automotive production rate. The second thing I would point out is that, these are not our numbers. For most of them, I think the HVOR is the only place we needed to develop that ourselves, that's actually third-party data. So, the way you can think about that is – look at what third-parties are saying about the growth and the installation of these applications in the worldwide fleet. And if we simply hold our share that we have today, and we've got nice shares in these applications, we're going to enjoy that growth and that will give you a sense of what that overall pace is.

Thanks, Joe.

Great. Thanks very much.

Your next question comes from the line of Will Stein from SunTrust. Please go ahead.

Thanks for taking my question and thanks again for the very detailed and thoughtful presentation today. I'm wondering if you can dig into inventory a little bit. Martha, you mentioned that while you did see a recovery in sales in China sell-through, if you will, that inventory has sort of muted the effect on production. Can you talk a bit about the predictability of the inventory builds and then burns in China relative to the rest of the world? Is that harder to see happen? Did this sort of surprise the company? And when do you think that it gets consumed? And then, maybe the same question relative to the controls business where I think you're still seeing a burn, wondering when we anticipate that ending. Thank you.

Sure. It's a little more difficult in China, for lots of reasons, you get many more players in the business. You have not sort of the same level of reporting visibility. Having said that, our backlog and our engagements with customers give us a decent sense then for what the actual take rates are. And in automotive in China, we get better visibility on that overall order rate than we get in many other aspects of our business in China. So, yes, it's more difficult than mature market, still better visibility than folks might be used to thinking about when you think about China. So, the way we're thinking about this is, we do think that the demand increase is there for the reason that we talked about. If you just look at the impact of low per capita utilization rates particularly in the Tier 2 through Tier 6 cities, we'll see vehicle growth in demand in 2016 on those. If we just do the math on the overall inventory build, we don't think we can ignore that piece of it. And our expectation is that that inventory build will be taken down throughout the year. That's how we got to our overall guide. Relative to other parts of the market, there are a few things, in China, in particular, we've seen a lot of inventory drawdown in most of the applications that affect our Solutions business. What we continue to be concerned about is the eroding manufacturing PMI. And so that will tend to have us expecting more adjustments, although there does seem to be a bit more discipline on those. Keep in mind now, when we talk about Sensing Solutions, in China, we're talking about no more than $150 million to $200 million in overall revenue for Sensata at this point.

It's helpful. If I can follow up with one more, there is a slide in the presentation that highlights your current average and then sort of your opportunity in all electric vehicles, which I think is helpful, and maybe at a higher number than I thought and probably, what others perhaps thought as well. But could you highlight what the total opportunity is in EV versus hybrids versus internal combustion for us today? Thank you.

Yeah. It's beginning to be not so different. We're starting to get a bit agnostic on this point. We're certainly – so let me take you through. I think, the one today that has got the most content opportunity is going to be a hybrid vehicle. And the reasons being that when you're talking about electrified vehicles, and certainly, when you're talking about pure EVs, what we're seeing is a much more deliberate move towards extremely efficient subsystems. And so, that's actually moved faster than we expected and that's why you're seeing these content on pure EVs for Sensata come up. So, if you just look at an extremely efficient subsystem, for example, climate control, braking, and then you conclude that that's going to be on both the hybrid vehicle and in EV and now you throw back the combustion on a hybrid, that's a nice overall content opportunity for Sensata. We're getting to the point though where the EV versus sort of a conventional car with an ICE engine, we're not seeing now – we're seeing a closing gap on overall content opportunity. You asked about what is that overall content opportunity, on EVs today, if we had 100% market share, for example, on the Chevy Bolt of everything we could provide, we would actually have significantly more than $30 per vehicle, which is a pretty good content number for us.

Thanks, Will.

Your next question comes from the line of Steven Fox from Cross Research. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Just a question from me. My understanding is that CST is not included in your organic growth. So can you sort of give us a sense for where you now see organic growth for that business in 2016 and what are the main drivers and what changed since 90 days ago?

On the top line, we'll have 11 months of CST as an acquired business. Right now, the revenue that we – the investment case holds and we feel it's perform – going to perform along with that. It will have a very – have no – very little impact on organic growth next year since we'll count it all as acquired for the most part.

Right. Now, I understand that. That's why I'm trying to understand what the CST as a standalone business would grow organically?

Yes. Just keep in mind, so we're not expecting a lot of growth from what would have been 2015 to 2016, 2015 being under other ownership. The point being when we look at the business and how it was managed, it was – there was not a lot of investment for growth. Our investment thesis is that we get it growing, and that's been a lot of the early days focus on this as well. So the earnings accretion that we're talking about is very well within our control. We're not looking to grow our way into earnings growth for CST in 2016. We do think that we start to see the business move from sort of end market to growth in the two-year to three-year time horizon.

Got it. And that's basically unchanged from say 90 days ago in terms of your view on the...

Yes. That's right. Exactly.

Thank you.

As there are no more questions, I'd like to turn the conference call back over to Mr. Sayer for closing remarks. Mr. Sayer?

Thank you, Lauren. I'd like to thank you all for joining our fourth quarter and full year 2015 financial results call today. Later in the quarter, Sensata will be participating in Goldman Sachs' Technology Investor Conference in San Francisco on February 9, and Barclays Industrial Investor Conference in Miami on February 17. These events will be webcast live and available for replay from the Investor section of our website at sensata.com. We appreciate your continued interest in and support of Sensata, and look forward to speaking with you on the road, and again next quarter. Thank you, and goodbye.

This concludes the call for today. You may now disconnect.