Good morning everyone, and welcome to the Sensata Technologies Q3 2020 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After today’s presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions]. Please also note, today's event is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference call over to Mr. Jacob Sayer, VP of Finance. Sir, please go ahead.

Thank you Jamie, and good morning everyone. I'd like to welcome you to Sensata's third quarter 2020 earnings conference call. Joining me on today's call are Jeff Cote, Sensata's CEO and President; and Paul Vasington, Sensata's Chief Financial Officer. In addition to the financial results press release we issued earlier today, we will be referencing a slide presentation during today's conference call. The PDF of this presentation can be downloaded from Sensata's Investor Relations website. We will post a replay of today's webcast shortly after the conclusion of today's call. As we begin, I would like to reference Sensata's Safe Harbor statement on slide 2. During this conference call, we will make forward-looking statements regarding future events or the financial performance of the company that involve certain risks and uncertainties. The company's actual results may differ materially from the projections described in such statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in our Forms 10-Q and 10-K, as well as other subsequent filings with the SEC. On slide 3, we show Sensata's GAAP results for the third quarter of 2020. We encourage you to review our GAAP financial statements in addition to today's presentation. Most of the subsequent information that we will discuss during today's call will relate to our non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of our GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures are included in our earnings release and in our presentation materials. The company provides details of its segment operating income on slides 10 and 11 of the presentation, which are the primary measures management uses to evaluate the business. Jeff will begin with key highlights of our business during the third quarter and first nine months of 2020. He will then provide an update on recent progress in our key Smart & Connected and Electrification Megatrends growth areas. Paul will cover our detailed financials for the third quarter of 2020, including organic and market outgrowth by business unit, describe our financial and balance sheet progress in the quarter, and then provide select financial guidance for the fourth quarter of 2020. We'll then take your questions after our prepared remarks. Now, I would like to turn the call over to Sensata's CEO and President, Jeff Cote.

Thank you Jacob, and welcome everyone. I'd like to start with some summary thoughts on our performance as outlined on slide 4. The rebound from lockdowns and quarantines instituted by governments around the world was dramatic in our end markets during the third quarter. Our revenue grew 37% in the quarter sequentially to $788.3 million even higher than the updated financial guidance that we provided on September 8. It is a strong testament to the flexibility and resiliency of our manufacturing model and supply chain that we were able to capitalize on improving markets and support our customers as they rapidly ramped up production during the quarter. I'd like to recognize the agility and hard work of our entire team in achieving these results. We continue to deliver a strong market outgrowth. For the nine months of -- first nine months of 2020, we delivered 840 basis points of outgrowth in our heavy vehicle off-road business and 610 basis points in our automotive business. We now believe that the inventory build by our automotive customers in the first half of the year was consumed in the third quarter. We continue to be confident that we will sustain our market outgrowth for 2020 in the range of 600 to 800 basis points for our heavy vehicle off-road and 400 to 600 basis points for automotive consistent with our long-term goals and supported by our higher levels of new business wins. During the quarter we closed over $95 million of new business wins bringing us to more than $320 million year-to-date. This pace is tracking ahead of last year and we believe our ability to close new business despite the disruptions of the pandemic or caused by the pandemic clearly demonstrates the mission-critical nature of Sensata's products. Sensata today is in a…

Thank you, Jeff. Key highlights for the third quarter as shown on slide 8 include revenue of $788.3 million, a decrease of 7.2% from the third quarter of 2019. Organic revenue decreased 7.5% largely due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Changes in foreign currency increased revenue by 0.3% and sequentially for the second quarter, reported revenue increased 36.7% reflecting a substantial rebound in our markets. Adjusted operating income was $154.8 million, a decrease of 22.4% compared to the third quarter of 2019, primarily due to lower revenues, lower productivity in our manufacturing operations, revenue mix and higher incentive compensation aligned to improve financial performance, partially offset by savings from cost reduction programs. Adjusted net income was $103.6 million, a decrease of 28.3% compared to the third quarter 2019. Adjusted EPS was $0.66 in the third quarter, a decrease of 26.7% compared to the prior year quarter. On September 8, we updated our financial guidance for the third quarter based on shipments to date, our order book and market information available at that time. Throughout the quarter, we saw continued strengthening, especially within our North American and European automotive end markets, which enabled us to exceed a higher revenue and earnings guidance that we provided in September. Now I will discuss our performance by end market in the third quarter of 2020 as outlined on slide 9. Overall, we reported an organic revenue decline of 7.5% year-on-year against an overall end market decline of approximately 12.3% representing market outgrowth of 480 basis points for the company. Our industrial business decreased 2.2% organically as global industrial end markets remain weak. Strong growth in factory automation and medical equipment, which includes sensors ventilator manufacturers mitigated some of the market decline. Our aerospace business decreased 24.4% organically from reduced OEM production and…

Thanks, Paul. I'll wrap up with a few key messages on slide 16 before we go to Q&A. Sensata has responded very well to the rapid upswing in many of our end markets. Demonstrating the flexibility of our manufacturing base and the resiliency of our supply chain, enabling us to capitalize on the improving end markets. Our ability to respond quickly to shifting demand positions us very well as a trusted source for our customers. We are delivering attractive end market outgrowth. We remain confident in our ability to continue to deliver this end market out growth for full year 2020 and expect to maintain this performance into the future based upon our strong new business wins. We continue to deliver strong free cash flow, which demonstrates Sensata's resilient financial model. We continue to invest in Megatrends and other growth initiatives that are opening up large and rapidly growing opportunities for Sensata across all of our end markets, and we are making excellent progress as evidenced by the first commercial fleet adoption for our Smart & Connected fleet initiative and by the $140 million in electrification new business wins so far this year. In addition, we continue to believe that the overall market environment may provide interesting opportunities to further strengthen our portfolio through strategically important value-creating acquisitions. We are pursuing technology collaborations and partnerships with third parties to expand our technological capabilities and accelerate our Megatrend commercialization. And finally, as we emerge from this recessionary period caused by the pandemic, while we may not return to peak margin rates in the short term, we do expect to deliver industry-leading margins for our shareholders, while increasing investments in our growth opportunities and in our people. Now, I'd like to turn the call back to Jacob.

Thank you, Jeff. Given the large number of listeners on the call, please limit yourself to one question each and a follow-up. If we have time, we'll circle back to the group for further questions. Jamie, please assemble the Q&A roster.

Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question today comes from Mark Delaney from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead with your question.

Yes. Good morning. Thanks very much for taking the question. The revenue guidance for 4Q is well above The Street and trends a very good improvement. I'm hoping, the company can speak a bit more on some of the recent order trends that it has been witnessing. And I think the fill rate that's implied in that 4Q outlook is 96% compared to about 88% last year. So hoping to understand, is there something that Sensata has seen in its order book that is suggesting order rates are going to be slowing in the fourth quarter compared to what it experienced a year ago? Or is that simply conservatism to account for some of the uncertainty for factors such as COVID?

Yeah, Mark, thanks for the question. This is Jeff. And so there was a sequential recovery again into the fourth quarter about a 5% sequential that leads us to about 2% off for fourth quarter versus last year. Obviously, auto continues to recover. HVOR notably turned positive from a revenue standpoint quarter-over-quarter that's been an 18-month trend on HVOR. Industrial tends to be a little seasonally lower in the fourth quarter. And obviously, the aero business as we know is still lagging, it's 23% down from last year. You noted the fill rate 96%. Absolutely that's higher than it typically is. We do remain conscious regarding lockdowns. We all see the news about what's going on. On the positive side, we feel as though all of our customers have done an amazing job of figuring out how to continue to stimulate demand with their end customers. We've also all done a tremendous job in terms of keeping our supply chains open. But given those concerns and also given that the last couple of quarters have seen some volatility in order rates from the time, we entered the quarter until when we exited the quarter we are remaining a little cautious. But I'm very optimistic about where things would go. October started off quite strong, which gives us a view that things will continue to be strong. But just watching the news and making sure that we're being cautious about where things could go, Mark.

That makes a lot of sense. Thanks for that. And for my second question, I was hoping to better understand the EBIT margins. And Jeff, you made some comments about just being an industry leading margin but maybe not quite peak rates. Maybe you can dive a little bit more into that topic. I mean, is there anything in the fourth quarter impacting margins that we should be aware of you're investing in some of these Megatrends and talked about a lot of really exciting things there but any incremental investments or other factors influencing margins in the fourth quarter? And any kind of commentary about what you may consider to be industry-leading, but not peak margins as you're thinking about next year especially as you're starting to implement this more fully implement this cost reduction program? Thanks.

So, Mark, and Mark, its Paul. Just thinking about the movement sequentially, we're going to see increased investment in Megatrends. And we've got some integration spend related to the PRECO acquisition. We still have the COVID sort of disruption that's happening in the supply chain. And then a little bit of higher incentive comp as our numbers continue to improve. So those would be the kind of headwinds against the stronger volume growth that we're seeing sequentially.

Thanks, Mark.

Our next question comes from Joseph Spak from RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead with your question.

Thanks very much. Just wanted to talk about the restructuring to align to the demand and that is saving you $65 million. When you announced that, you talked about, meeting some lower end market demand. But now it does appear that, demand is recovering faster than expected at least in some end markets. So are those numbers still valid? Or does some of that go away as you look forward?

So Jeff, I can take it. It's Paul. The numbers are valid they're related to restructuring actions, a lot of savings is people-related service to continue to execute on those restructuring programs, but not all done as we said, we're implementing over the course of this year. And well into next year. But the plan is to continue to implement those programs. And generate that savings. Some of that savings ultimately may get offset with a higher investment in our Megatrend initiatives, but that's to be determined, as we develop our 2021 plan.

Okay. And then just on the electrification, I was wondering, obviously some positive developments here with the awards and the higher CPV commentary. Can you just remind us, how big the electrification business is today? And then aside from the higher CPV, what about the margin profile of that business? Because I assume it doesn't have the scale of the ICE business today. So where are they today? And where can they go in the future?

Yeah. So when you think about the total company, that's the way we think about the current electrification business and the opportunity for the business, in terms of that $6.5 billion SAM. Electrification represents only about 5%, when I think of the new trend of electrification. Obviously we've got a -- our legacy control business that serves, as a self-setting circuit breaker in the market. And I wouldn't necessarily include that in the broader electrification theme. But it's a small portion today. But it's very rapidly growing. And it's a target area, that we're looking at around high-voltage components and broad grid infrastructure, which will be needed to really allow the Megatrend to continue to move in this direction. We're seeing very positive signs from our customers. Everybody has continued to invest in this trend regulation continues to support this trend. Big NBO's almost half of our -- almost half of our NBO's thus far this year were in this area. And we're continuing to develop not only organic capabilities, but also look at M&A to focus on this as well.

Thanks, Jeff.

Our next question comes from Nik Todorov from Longbow Research. Please go ahead with your question.

Hi. Good morning guys. Thank you. And congrats on, great results, I was wondering if you can talk a little bit about the -- you mentioned unfavorable mix in both performance and in sensing. Maybe can you unpack that a little bit and talk about, the puts and takes into the fourth quarter gross margin? And maybe how much of COVID costs expect into the fourth quarter? I think Paul you mentioned about, $60 million or $65 million in the third Q. Thanks.

Yeah. The mix is -- we've got performance sensing business that's auto and HVOR and that the Industrial Aerospace business the latter being more profitable. As we look for Q3 to Q4, you can see this is pretty significant decline which is seasonal and normal in nature in our industrial business. And our aerospace business still continues to be down, as Jeff mentioned, almost 22%, 23% year-over-year. So those two parts of our business are driving down the unfavorable revenue mix to some extent. It's also our automotive business is really recovering very quickly. And that is our lower-margin business when you think of the four segment business units that we have. So it's just a dynamic of, where they are in terms of recovery cycle. And the probability across the portfolio of businesses, so far that's driving that mix.

COVID cost was the second question.

Yeah. So COVID cost. They've been running somewhere, in the $5 million to $10 million a quarter. It's just depending on, just -- its labor inefficiencies, or logistics inefficiencies, the supply chains have been disrupted. And it's all the elevated costs related to protecting our place. So they're running $5 million to $10 million on average, in every quarter. Some more -- some quarters were a bit higher than that, somewhere in the lower end of that range.

Okay. I got it. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Amit Daryanani from Evercore. Please go ahead with your question.

Hi. Thanks for taking my question guys. I guess first off just on the December quarter guide, I think the implied assumption is auto production is down 4%, 5% in December. Could you just maybe talk about, what are the geographical assumptions, over there for auto production? And I'm curious, do you think this guide could prove to be as conservative as the one you had in September, because inventory in the auto ecosystem still seems to be fairly lean at this point.

Yeah. So let me touch on, where we think automotive will be -- I think you got it right about 4%, 5% down year-on-year, in the fourth quarter. North America we're calling it about down 3% versus fourth quarter last year Europe 2%, so a pretty significant snapback in terms of performance sequentially in Europe. China is down right? So that's another big change, as China was in a growth mode and now is down 7% versus fourth quarter of last year. And then Japan and Korea are down 8%, 10% as well. I note that, from an overall production rate, it is an improvement during the fourth quarter about 1.7 million units based upon Sensata's mix. But still lower than where they were fourth quarter of last year.

And I would just add that we're pretty much on top of the IHS estimates for Q4 that we adjust our business mix compared to the production that is in the IHS estimates you'll see a little bit more negativity on the market than what you would see on pure IHS numbers when you exclude tailwind.

That's really helpful. And I guess as a follow-up, I mean, you guys have had a really impressive recovery I think from the bottoms of COVID over here operationally. So I'd love to get your perspective on what do you think gets you to go back to the buyback program and reinitiate that? What triggers that? Are you trying to wait for end market and demand to get better? Or are you trying to wait for the debt pay down to happen? I guess, what triggers the buyback to come back would be helpful to understand?

I think, we tried to lay out for you how we're thinking about capital deployment going forward. Really excited about the opportunities on the M&A side and continue to grow our businesses and into the megatrend issues either organically or inorganically. So that's probably -- if you think of the priority that's where the priority is right now. The call of the 6.25% is a highly NPV driven transaction. So we like the economics around doing that. But that will be determined like if assuming economic conditions remain good certainly would be interested in getting that value for the company. I think share repurchases are still an important part of our capital deployment strategy. You see them as a third leg in the third of the three options that we have right now, still important but probably deemphasizing that a bit from work from the other two.

Thanks, Amit.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Samik Chatterjee from JPMorgan. Please go ahead with your question.

Yeah. Hi, thanks for taking my question. This is Bharat on for Samik. So just one question from me. If I look at your 4Q guidance. Sensing solutions you expect the end market to decline 13% to 14%. So if you could just help us think about between industrial and aerospace what are you thinking about like each segment? How much improvement you're expecting in industrial? And within aerospace I mean defense continues to be strong like are you seeing any signs of hitting in the other sub-segments there within aerospace? Thank you.

Sure. Yeah, sure. So on the industrial side fourth quarter is still about 9% down from prior year on a revenue basis. That's seasonally usually the fourth quarter is a little bit lower for the industrial business. And then on the aerospace side it's still down pretty dramatically 26% versus prior year. So that's what we're seeing in terms of the end markets there. So Paul do you want to add anything to that?

No I think that covers it.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Luke Junk from Baird. Please go ahead with your question.

Good morning guys. Thanks for taking the question. First, just wanted to better understand the first commercial agreement for your heavy vehicle and off-road Smart & Connected fleet management offering. Maybe if you could just comment on how the revenue breaks down from just a model standpoint between the more one-time aspects in terms of sort of front-end sales and the recurring piece? And then you also cite $90 million of Smart & Connected business wins in total year-to-date. And just wondering if you could provide a little more color on that as well. Thanks.

Yeah. I'd be glad to. So it's a first commercial experience with this in terms of closing business. And as I'm sure you know fleets don't do a big bang in terms of how they roll this out. They start with a pilot, they roll it out to additional vehicles and then they continue to expand that over time. And that's what we would expect across not only this one fleet manager that we've engaged with but the others that we're in the process of having pilots with. So it's a small start. That's a small revenue base to start with but it's a clear indication that the solution provides value and the fleet managers are engaging with us to roll it out. And as I mentioned a lot of these fleets in the aftermarket have tens of thousands of vehicles right. So the magnitude of the addressable market that we've talked about of $6 billion is real based upon a conservative view of fan-out across that market. And so different fleet managers will choose different business models and contract structures on this. So this particular fleet manager wanted a full subscription basis. So in that environment, we buy the equipment or build the equipment. We work together to install it and then they pay us on a subscription basis over a six or seven-year time frame. Others will choose to buy equipment upfront and then just pay for data services. So every model will be slightly different and will tailor it to the interest and the desire of the individual fleet manager. I'm very excited about the opportunity, very excited about bringing it to commercialization in a very short period of time and looking forward to providing more updates as we continue to fan this out with other customers and with this particular customer.

So Luke had mentioned as well the $90 million in MDOs. It is important to note Luke that's in the OEM market rather than in the aftermarket. So those will be with the truck and trailer manufacturers rather than the fleet manager. So more traditional hardware sale from Sensata.

Right, great point Jacob. So it's important to note and we've talked about this in the past but the foundation of our Smart & Connected initiative here is around tire pressure and in an on-road truck environment there are unique requirements associated with enabling tire pressure which introduces the notion of a hub or a vehicle area network which is the foundation for collecting lots of additional sensor data to feed information and insight into the cloud. So that's the part that's being implemented in OEM's and we're doing the same thing in aftermarket with a broader suite of offering.

Okay. Thank you. Thanks for all of that. That's super helpful. And then maybe just as a follow-up maybe more of a hypothetical. So the U.S. election coming next week, if of course there's a change of administration. Biden has signaled that he would move to rise fuel economy standards fairly sharply above even the prior level contemplated under the Obama administration. Can you just talk about what that impact might look like in your business in terms of the clean and efficient driver? And ultimately how does Sensata win the stricter fuel economy standards in the U.S. potentially?

Yes. It's -- regulation and environmental policy is a long-term game. And it's not something that can change overnight. But the trends are very positive in terms of being favorable to what it is that we offer as a company what our value proposition is. And I would view that a tilt toward more environmentally friendly and more regulatory-driven policy would over time be quite positive for us as a company. And so hard to know exactly how that will fan-out. But certainly we feel as though even with the current administration the opportunities are significant if there's a shift toward more conservative policies from an environmental standpoint it could -- it has to help us in the long run.

Thanks, Luke.

Our next question comes from David Kelley from Jefferies. Please go ahead with your question.

Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking my question. I guess first one starting with automotive. I believe in the prepared remarks you referenced challenges to support outsized customer demand ramp. Just curious, if there were any onetime costs such as overtime in the quarter to meet the more aggressive industry snapback than we all expected?

No. No, David. It's just -- we run our business very lean managing our cost of demand as tightly as possible. And with the rapid improvement in the end market and we weren't able to serve all the demand that our customers were ordering for product. And so that had some of an impact on the amount of revenue we were able to generate in the quarter. Long-cycle business we've got some long lead-time items. It takes a little time to get caught up and we'll get caught up, but it did create a little bit of a bump in terms of our ability to generate all the demand that was out there.

Yes. And the only thing I'd add to that is that in the third quarter, you know, that the trend improved dramatically through the quarter. And so given the guide that we provided when we -- in July you could probably sense that July was strong, but not as strong as September. And so the growth of demand during the quarter was quite strong. We're going to approach that a little bit differently in the fourth quarter given that the demand is there. So October we're starting out strong to make sure that we don't have a December that has a high demand that creates challenges to deliver. But again, you want to go back to the team's efforts on this managing through a very steep decline in the second quarter and managing costs and everything that needs to be done as a result of that and then the snapback managing that a real testament to the team's capabilities.

Okay. Great. Thanks. That's super helpful. And maybe as a follow-up in line with that demand discussion. Should we think about outgrowth in auto is beginning to normalize? You target 4% to 6% -- 4% to 6% range go forward or should we expect some ongoing variability as production slowly or perhaps continue to aggressively returns back to normal?

We had called out that the third quarter would be a little bit lower for auto given COVID-related launch delays right in the second quarter as customers were preparing for launch in the third and fourth quarter. They had some challenges in terms of people being able to do what they needed to in terms of testing products and so forth and preparing for launch. So we called that out. That became true 290 basis points of outgrowth in the third quarter for the automotive business. Fortunately, our other businesses offset it. So as a company we were at 520 basis points of outgrowth. There's always some level of variability by quarter, by business. But again, I would point to the fact that given that we are a long-cycle business for most of our end markets that we serve, we are able to see what that outgrowth is going to look like. They plan for these launches. And we know what the new business wins are. So we have a high degree of confidence in long-term being able to maintain in that range not necessarily in any given quarter but long-term for sure.

Thank you, David.

Our next question comes from Brian Johnson from Barclays. Please go ahead with your question.

Yes. Thank you. Very quick housekeeping question and then the real question. The housekeeping question is there anything changing between operating income and EPS in the fourth quarter? Just my math I'm getting a little lighter EPS than implied by the EBIT upside versus consensus.

Brian, I think for all the lines you have three things that drive it. It's balance sheet hedging of currency exposures. Obviously, interest expense is rising because of the new bond deal, which is a higher coupon than the revolver. And taxes are arising a little bit in terms of mix.

Okay. Thanks. Second question on the electrification offset that you outlined, are those in actual vehicles right now? Or is it more the products on your shelves have those potential?

I'm sorry, the potential for what? In terms of the...

For PPP offset.

I got you. So the $50 of content you're referring to?

Right. Is that something that actually customers have filled on?

Yes.

Or you just have a shelf in your store that they could if they wanted there to get back to?

No, no, no. So these are designed in products for vehicles -- for battery electric vehicles that have 50 or greater of content in them. And it's not just we have a product for when and if they choose to buy it. So it's designed in it's sold business that generates that content per vehicle.

Okay. And if you were to think about the market share of these opportunities versus what in your sensors that go in the combustion engine equipment. Do you see any meaningful difference more concentrated less concentrated spots?

Yes. Well a little -- the wins on the electrification side tend to be a little more lumpy. And what I mean by that is they're bigger because the platforms that our customers are creating tend to be larger and panned out across a larger number of vehicles. So the wins are a little bit more lumpy. Therefore, the product categories tend to be a little bit more lumpy as well in terms of the overall opportunity. But there are many opportunities in the electrified vehicle space that we're either serving today or pursuing that we believe will continue to allow us to -- that will benefit from this trend that we're seeing.

Yes. And just final follow-up question there. GM announced the LTM skateboard with wireless battery sensing. It was a different company though they highlighted publicly acquired by Spring like that for the solution. Does that mean that -- do you still have an opportunity on the GM platform? Is that a competitor in a year? Or did they just choose to highlight a different part of the platform that's not quite the same as what you're selling?

For battery management, it's not us that's doing battery management, but we're certainly, we have an opportunity to serve other components within GM for that platform.

Thanks, Brian.

Our next question comes from Wamsi Mohan from Bank of America. Please go ahead with your question.

Yes. Thank you. Can you maybe talk about how we should think about incremental margins heading into 2021, especially given that you have some material cost initiatives that you have underway going into next year? And I have a quick follow-up.

Wamsi, its Paul. So we're not going to be obviously giving guidance yet for 2021, but I will say that with the growing volume, we do expect if the volume does continue at this pace that it would drive nice incremental margins from that incremental volume if we stay at these levels. Obviously, the repositioning actions will help. We're going to continue to invest in the Megatrends in our growth initiatives and as Jeff talked about we are continuing to invest in our people. We have a paper performance model. So with greater profitability, greater incentives, compensation within the P&L next year. So I do think margins will expand next year, if revenues continue at these levels.

So Paul, just to clarify though the conversion rate itself -- the incremental margin conversion rate itself, the drop-through should be higher than historical on those incremental?

For a period of time, that's right. For a period of time maybe I would say it's got to look a lot like what we've seen on the way down. By the way, we'll see incremental margins higher than normal. At some point, we're going to have to put investment cross back into the business. So that will start eating into the incremental. But right now, we're working in an environment where we have the capacity margins dropped a lot because we weren't able to just get out our semi-variable and fixed costs kind of same phenomenon on the way back up. So more of a variable model rate.

Right. As a follow-up, I mean just sort of segues into this, but more on a 2020 basis. And if you look at the revenue guide that you gave at the start of the year pre-COVID and where we're ending up. It's about $500 million lower on revenues and about $1.50 lower on EPS roughly. Would you say substantially all of that is COVID for revenues? Or do you think that there were other moving pieces in there? And then what about on the decremental margin side, can you maybe parse that again into COVID versus the restructuring versus the megatrend spends or anything else that you think is material? Thank you.

At a high level, I think we've done a good job delivering on our outgrowth targets. So I think we executed the things that were in our control and so the outgrowth has been strong. I think most of this is -- not all of this is market-related and I would suggest that it's all related or mostly related to COVID-19. In terms of our cost structure, we've talked about a few times that, in the first half of the year, we weren't really able to get at our semi-variable and fixed cost. So, we were seeing our cost structure moving in line with -- our volumes move more aligned with our variable costs. We took actions in Q2 around temporary furlough. It generated $22 million in savings, so that was a temporary benefit. It didn't repeat in the second half. Now, we're doing permanent cost actions because the demand levels are lower and they will be lower for some period of time. I think those are the major drivers of profitability. We're adding -- we are investing more in Megatrends because we see a lot of opportunity to grow and we want to pursue those opportunities for long-term sustainable growth. So, that is a lever as well. But for the most part, I mean I think we're just cycling through a much -- a very depressed end market that's now starting to recover and we're showing strong results because of it.

Thanks so much.

Our next question comes from Jim Suva from Citi Investment Research. Please go ahead with your question.

Thank you. Can you just talk a little bit about any visibility you have on channel inventory? Or sometimes you sell into a middle harness maker or a middle aggregator whether it'd be Delphi or other, both on the automotive side as well on the HVAC side?

Yes. So the auto side is a lot more transparent to us. To be candid, auto, HVOR, aerospace is a huge amount more transparent. We talked about the fact that we believe, we built about $25 million of inventory in the channel in automotive in the first half of the year. We believe that that has unwound in the third quarter. We had originally expected that to unwind over the balance of the year, so it unwound quicker than we had thought. We don't see any evidence that in aerospace HVOR and in auto that there's any significant inventory builds. And candidly Jim, we judge that based upon discussions with our buyers, but also calls we get if something doesn't ship on a Friday and it was supposed to. And that supply chain is fairly tight. We don't believe there's a lot of inventory. On the industrial side, it's a little harder. You point out that's the one area where we do sell-through some distributors. The indications that we get is that, there's not a ton of inventory build there. I think, we all experienced this being consumers in terms of going to try to buy major home appliances or other goods. There is a backlog in terms of demand that has not been able to get fulfilled. And I would use that as a proxy for belief in terms of at least our products, whether or not there's any significant pent-up inventory in the system. We're not calling anything else that we're viewing will unwind in the near term.

Okay. And so unwinding, does it get you back to equilibrium? Or is unwinding get you back to a little bit too lean than where you'd like to be?

There isn't anything to unwind. And so, I would say that we're probably about an equilibrium now in terms of inventory in the supply chain. I would say that with the increased demand, you might see customers trying to build a little bit more inventory to make sure that they can serve end market demand rather than in a mode of cutting back on inventory. That would be where I think we are on the continuum.

Great. Thanks so much for the details and clarifications.

Thanks, Jim.

Our next question comes from Michael Filatov from Berenberg Capital. Please go ahead with your question.

Hi guys. Thanks for taking my question. I was just wondering, if you could update us sort of on the revenue for GIGAVAC and sort of how that performed in that business and the high-voltage contact has performed relative to the rest of the business? And then also, sort of broadly speaking, I know there's more high-voltage contactors on sort of higher performance electric vehicles. And I was wondering, how many contactors generally speaking on average do you guys have right now on EVs or BEVs and how that -- you see that trending over time for your business?

Yes. So, a couple of points in there. So, on the GIGAVAC business although, we're not calling it out directly, I would say in a significantly down market GIGAVAC has continued to grow quite nicely. And that's driven based upon the content growth that we're seeing for the offering that they have. And so, we had a -- when we bought this business, we knew what was going to be a very fast grower, very accretive growth rates to Sensata overall and that's what we're targeting from an M&A standpoint. The businesses that can have differentiated margins but also be growers that grow at rates much faster than the core business. GIGAVAC has fulfilled that. In terms of the number of contactors, that's a platform system architecture question. There are a number of vehicles out there today that have four to six contactors in place others have two contractors in place. Given the magnitude of the cost associated with contactors, I would expect that over time that will -- the architecture associated that will push down to fewer numbers. But going in the other direction or pushing in the other direction for more protection and therefore more contactors is that, understanding what this application does. It protects the most valuable asset in the vehicle battery and it also protects the charging equipment and the person applying the charge. So, it performs an incredibly important function. OEMs will always look to take out cost to be more competitive, but we don't view that as being anything that would be unusual or a negative toward our investment case on this particular acquisition.

Thank you, Michael.

Our next question comes from Joseph Giordano from Cowen. Please go ahead with your question.

Hey, good morning. This is Robert in for Joe. Thanks for taking my questions. I just first wanted to see if you could provide a view of what you're seeing in terms of underlying investment in auto production facilities. Is this more like filling existing capacity? Or are you seeing anything different across the various regions?

In terms of our customers, Joe is that what you're asking or how we're building out our capacity. I'm sorry, just -- if you could be a little more specific on the question.

Sorry. In terms of your customers like at their facilities where their underlying investments being directed?

Yes. I don't see any meaningful change in terms of our customers where they're designing, manufacturing, assembling vehicles. And no major change on our part, either in terms of how we're doing this. We just talked about GIGAVAC. We now have automated high-speed lines in both China and in Mexico to serve the global automotive market. And so we've navigated through some of the challenges in terms of trade and so forth that have expressed but we -- I just haven't seen it result in any major change in terms of supply chain development.

Thank you, Robert.

Our next question comes from Craig Hettenbach from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead with your question.

Yes. Thank you. Jeff, looking at the industrial market beyond what looks to be kind of an industrial kind of recovery here. Can you maybe just frame the growth expectations in that market? I know autos get a lot more attention given the significant size, but just across the portfolio you have kind of in the mid to longer term, what type of growth opportunities do you see in industrial?

Yes. Great question. I appreciate the opportunity to talk about some of the other end markets that we serve. Obviously, industrial is an enormous market, highly fragmented. We have a number of different products and end markets that we're serving there. You know that the third -- it's actually the market that's gone down the less, but it also has recovered the least amount during the year. So that different that -- market concentration in terms of a lot of different areas has been very helpful. So third quarter was a very strong quarter for our industrial business. It was only down about 2%, really driven based upon the demand for medical device, a small portion of that overall business, but had really helped it. It's a target area for us. So when we start to talk about things like smart grid infrastructure that would fall more squarely in the industrial business, certainly we'll continue to explore all industrial IoT-type applications within that business. So lots of opportunity. It's important also to note that the biggest component of that business is the -- our legacy controls business. And it's a very profitable business, a very sticky business, but a slower growing business. And so when you look at that business in total, our target areas will be on the faster-growing areas as opposed to the core businesses that we have in there that are GDP-like growers. Hope that helps.

Thanks, Craig.

Our next question comes from Deepa Raghavan from Wells Fargo Securities. Please go ahead with your question.

Hi, good morning all. Jeff, can you talk about the Megatrends investment in terms of autos versus HVOR versus industrial? And I assume autos obviously investments are increasing, but can you also talk about any -- our spends -- our investments in industrial accelerating as well? How do you think about that Megatrend investment portfolio?

Yes. So I apologize. I think I got the nature of the question, but let me repeat it just to make sure. So it's -- where the Megatrend investment is being focused across end markets? Is that the nature of the question?

Yes. I mean is that accelerating in the industrial portion and auto portion as well?

Yes. Okay. Okay. Yes. So we're being very purposeful that our Megatrend, our investments are company-wide initiatives. And because we believe that these Megatrends will impact all of the end markets that we serve. Now it's critically important that we have a very strong position in electrification in auto. So as the trend from combustion engine to electrified platforms continues that we're well positioned for that. But make no mistake, we are targeting capabilities that can serve the broader market. And so, clearly as we look at the organic development that we have ongoing that will serve auto industrial, the HVOR market a little less so the aerospace for obvious reasons. I think electrification is a little further out, but it serves all of those end markets. And you'll see that both our organic and our M&A-related activity will be focused on all of the end markets as we pursue these Megatrends. And yes that applies to the Smart & Connected as well. More concentration in Smart & Connected around transport and logistics chains. But certainly, the focus would be to look at it pretty broadly across a number of market segments.

Got it. One on potential costs heading into 2021, I think since you were able to talk about, any early thoughts generally, but also how do you think about momentum exiting 2020 entering 2021? And if you can also focus a little bit on the inventory situation in HVOR here in the U.S. or elsewhere, do you think the OEMs would have replenished efficient inventory by end of the year? Or should that continue to influence production into 2021 also and thereby benefits suppliers like yourself?

Yeah. So, obviously, we're not going to provide specific guidance on 2021. But if you look at all of the third-party forecasts, it would suggest that the growth will continue from 2020 where we landed into 2021. If you look at all of our end markets even at the fourth quarter guide, they were down fairly dramatically from 2019, and candidly, nowhere near peak levels, right? So, if we pick the automotive market specifically, we're forecasting, call it down, close to 20% year-over-year. The peak auto markets were back in 2016, 2017. So we're nowhere near peak automotive market. So, our view would be that 2020 is a fairly good little point in terms of to recover from. We're not taking that for granted. Everybody is watching signals to see whether or not there could be a double dip or other impact, but the feeling is that, from here there will be some nice growth potential over the next year or couple of years, depending on the rate of recovery. Certainly, the recovery thus far this year has been stronger than, at least, I would have anticipated. Thanks, Deepa.

Our next question comes from Matt Sheerin from Stifel. Please go ahead with your question.

Yes. Thank you. Just a couple of quick ones for me here. Just regarding the commentary around M&A, Jeff, and that being a priority for cash use, you've also talked about focusing on areas of growth emerging markets all the things that fit into your technology themes. But could you talk about a little bit more on that strategy, particularly, are we continuing to expect more tuck-in acquisitions versus the larger deals you did four or five years ago?

Yeah. I am glad you asked that to sort of clarify. So, we've kept the pipeline for M&A quite full during this time. Although we've been for obvious reasons cautious in terms of capital deployment in the area of M&A other than the one small transaction that we did with PRECO. The near-term focus will be on more bolt-on byte sized type M&A. So, nothing in our sort of target zone of that $1 million purchase price or $1 billion purchase price type range. The target areas will be around the electrification and Smart & Connected areas. So, electrified equipment, broadly, not just auto, electrified equipment and smart grid infrastructure. And also around Smart & Connected transport and logistics, so that is a focus. We're also going to be focused on, not only high-growth segments, but businesses that will be highly accretive to Sensata's growth rate, right? So, they're not value play where we're going to buy something, we're going to extract cost. We believe that the businesses that we're targeting can have differentiated margins, perhaps not at Sensata's margin, but differentiated margin, but very high-growth rates and where we have the ability or the right to play, right? So, solutions or competency is that we have or end markets where we have specific knowledge regarding bringing mission-critical solutions. So, that's our target area. Not big bang type transformational stuff more bolt-ons to further our strategy.

Thank you, Matt.

Our next question comes from Shawn Harrison from Loop Capital. Please go ahead with your question.

Good morning everybody. And thanks for taking my question. I guess my inability to remember to hit star one got me a…

…lot of inbound e-mails, asking…

Exactly, more on the guidance specifically a lot of inbound e-mails, just asking about if we could even further define Paul the step-up in the OpEx sequentially, I know you cited incentive comp and more investments and some other factors. But just is there a way to quantify the exact dollar amount, you're seeing step-up in OpEx into the fourth quarter to kind of level set us as we start to then think about 2021?

I'd say it's -- so we're up sequentially from Q3, Q4 around $13.5 million. And I would have said if without the incremental investment, we would have been up about $20 million with improved volume. So it's probably $7 million, $8 million, incremental that's when you consider the items I mentioned earlier, on the call.

Very helpful, okay.

That's a same question.

Okay. And then as a brief follow-up, just on the electrification side of the color Jeff. Maybe if you could speak to three years out its $50 of content now. I think we all expect range to go up, charging time to come down. What would that potentially -- and maybe other items you can add into the vehicle, take your content up to from $50 on average now to say three years out?

Yeah. So I think it's a question of the item that you pointed out. How quickly, our customers migrate toward, these harder to do applications. I believe strongly, that it's the direction that everything will go. And that requires the types of capabilities that we have. Given the fact that we believe, on those vehicles today we have $50 of content based upon where we're sold in. Obviously we're not stopping there. And we'll have a number of organic initiatives underway that will continue to drive that north. And we'll also without question target other M&A-related activity that we'll continue to move that north of that number. And so, its large portals out there, in terms of the target opportunity, don't want to make a specific call on what our target content per vehicle is. But there's ample space if you will for us to pursue, that can continue to drive that in a very positive direction for us as a company.

And ladies and gentlemen, with that, we've reached the end of today's question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference call back over to, Jacob Sayer for any closing remarks.

Thank you, Jamie. I'd like to thank everyone for joining us this morning. Sensata will be participating in the upcoming R.W. Baird, Industrial Investor Conference on November 10th and the Melius Industrial Investor Conference on December 9th. We look forward to seeing you at one of those events, or on our fourth quarter earnings call in early February. Thank you for joining us this morning and for your interest in Sensata. Jamie you may now end the call.

Ladies and gentlemen, with that we will end today's conference. We do thank you for attending. You may now disconnect your lines.