Greetings and welcome to the Sunoco LP’s First Quarter 2023 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Scott Rachel, SVP, Finance and Treasurer. Please go ahead.

Thank you and good morning, everyone. On the call with me this morning are Joe Kim, Sunoco LP’s President and Chief Executive Officer; Karl Fails, Chief Operations Officer; Dylan Bramhall, Chief Financial Officer; and other members of the management team. Today’s call will contain forward-looking statements that are subject to various risks and uncertainties. These statements include expectations and assumptions regarding the partnership’s future operations and financial performance. Actual results could differ materially and the partnership undertakes no obligation to update these statements based on subsequent events. Please refer to our earnings release as well as our filings with the SEC for a list of these factors. During today’s call, we will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow as adjusted. Please refer to the Sunoco LP website for a reconciliation of each financial measure. I’d like to start the call by looking at some of our first quarter highlights. Sunoco delivered a record first quarter, with adjusted EBITDA of $221 million compared to $191 million a year ago, an increase of 16%. The partnership sold 1.9 billion gallons in the first quarter, up 9% from the first quarter of last year. Fuel margin for all gallons sold was $0.129 per gallon compared to $0.124 per gallon a year ago. Fuel margin results include the benefit of the 7-Eleven makeup payment of $24 million. Total first quarter operating expenses were $127 million, an increase of $3 million from the same period last year. We spent $29 million of growth capital in the first quarter and $8 million in maintenance capital. First quarter distributable cash flow as adjusted was $160 million compared to $142 million in the first quarter of 2022, yielding a current quarter coverage ratio of 1.8x and a trailing 12-month coverage ratio…

Thanks, Scott. Good morning, everyone. Our team delivered yet another strong quarter, supported by continued margin strength, consistent expense discipline and solid operations across our business, including our recent investments. Starting with volumes, we were up about 9% in the first quarter versus the first quarter of last year. Even though industry volumes remain lower than last year, we have continued to see improved volume performance relative to prior years as we have realized volume contributions from our capital deployed both organic and through acquisitions. With respect to margins, the strong margin performance over the last few years continued in the first quarter as we delivered margins of $0.129 per gallon. I will point out a few items that contributed to these margins. Some are consistent with prior discussions, namely higher industry breakeven margins as well as continued volatility in the fuel markets. Specifically for this quarter, we also received the 7-Eleven makeup payment that occurs annually in the first quarter, which contributed over $0.01 per gallon to our reported margin. Moving on to our growth. Yesterday, we closed on our second acquisition in the past 6 months with the addition of 16 terminals from Zenith Energy. We are excited about the combination of these assets with our fuel distribution portfolio and are looking forward to growing our presence in each of these markets. The majority of these terminals overlay our existing footprint, providing synergies with our fuel distribution portfolio. The remaining terminals provide us with new market opportunities to expand our fuel distribution reach. After synergies, we expect a mid single-digit EBITDA multiple on this investment. This acquisition is yet another example of our ability to deliver growth that fits into our strategic objectives and deliver solid returns. Finally, a comment on expenses. You have heard me constantly talk about our ability to manage expenses. Controlling expenses remains one of our core strengths and first quarter expenses were in line with our 2023 guidance we provided in December. We announced today an update to that 2023 guidance. We put a lot of thought into our guidance last December and we remain confident with those numbers. However, we want to include the impacts of adding the Zenith Energy acquisition to our portfolio. The changes include: increasing adjusted EBITDA by $15 million to a range of $865 million to $915 million, projecting operating expenses of between $540 million and $550 million, an increase of $15 million, and increasing our maintenance capital spend by $5 million to approximately $65 million. Before turning the time over to Joe, I will wrap up by stating that we are off to a strong start to the year and we will continue to focus on delivering results for our stakeholders through our proven strategy of gross profit optimization, tight expense control, solid and efficient operations and growing our business. Joe?

Thanks, Karl. Good morning, everyone. We delivered a strong first quarter. Scott and Karl have walked you through the key details. However, there are a few items that I would like to provide some additional commentary. We continue to have confidence in our business model, both short-term and long-term. Before this year started, we provided guidance, and we stated we expect to have another strong year. Third of the way into 2023, our expectation remains the same. Our base expectation has been enhanced by our most recent acquisition. As a result, we increased our guidance. These types of investments give us confidence that we will continue to deliver strong results year after year, thus, we announced a distribution increase. Over the last 7 years, we have demonstrated our commitment to a secure distribution. We have never cut distributions even through unforeseen and challenging economic environments. Given that this is one of our key pillars, we’re very thoughtful as to any distribution increase. The decision to increase has to meet the following criteria, stay above our target coverage ratio, protect our balance sheet, remain a growth company, and, finally, a clear path to increase distributions again over a multiyear time frame. We’re confident the answer is yes on all of these factors. Operator, that concludes our prepared remarks. You may open the line for questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Gabe Moreen with Mizuho.

Hi, good morning, guys. Maybe if I can start off on the Zenith acquisition. Can you just talk about timing for getting to that mid-single-digit multiple post-synergies? And then also, I’m just curious as far as integrating the assets, how much you see being, I guess, Sunoco business versus third parties? And also whether you’re particularly excited about doing anything with any of the specific terminals from a growth standpoint?

Yes. Good morning, Gabe, this is Karl. I think on the – this acquisition, our synergy capture is probably a little faster in the past. We’ve talked about our synergies being captured over the first 2 years of operation. I think by the end of the first year, we will probably be at our synergy run rate. So by the time we get into next year, we should be in those mid single-digits. As far as the asset profile, I talked in my prepared remarks about kind of a nice combination between overlay our existing fuel distribution portfolio and some new. I’ll just give one example of an area we’re excited about, not that this is the only place we’re excited about, but the Salmon, North Carolina terminal in that asset mix is a good terminal. And we have some business in North Carolina. It’s just not quite as big as we’d like it to be. So that’s just one example of an area. But I think the whole network and our combination of, as you mentioned, being able to put our own volumes in the terminals, but again, I think we’re a little different in companies that have fuel distribution businesses with our terminals in that we welcome and love third parties in our terminals, and I think have a good track record of purchasing terminals with a large third-party presence in keeping and growing that business with our third-party customers as well. So I think it’s going to be a good mixture of both.

Great. And maybe if I could just follow-up in general thoughts on the M&A market right now, what you’re seeing out there? Should we expect additional deals through the rest of the year?

Hi, Gabe, this is Joe. I think what I’ve said probably for the last 2 or 3 years is still highly appropriate today. We see opportunities. We see value plays. We believe it’s still a buyer’s market, especially for companies that bring synergies to the table. And I think our track record shows that we can buy stuff at attractive multiples, and on top of that add synergies and finally, deliver on those results. So the market looks good for us. And I think what we saw this year – last year, I think we will see again this year.

Great. And then maybe, Joe, you had mentioned kind of the different boxes you need to check for those – that distribution increase. I’m just curious as far as arriving at the 2%, it seems like you would have a lot more latitude to maybe be a little bit more aggressive than the 2%. How should we think about kind of staying at that level? What you’d need to see, I think, to maybe accelerate the 2% growth rate? And I assume when you say mean stay a growth company, a lot of that refers to giving yourself flexibility in the M&A markets. So maybe you can speak to that, too.

Yes. I think the way you characterize it very last time is very appropriate that we want – our pillars remain exactly the same, secure distribution, strong balance sheet and growth. So at the 2%, it provides a lot of flexibility for us. Depending on evolving value creation opportunities that we see, it gives us the ability to continue to do 2%, grow 2%, put more into growth capital if there is an opportunity on the balance sheet. So we like the flexibility. And if you just look at – and I think I know where you’re going with this. If you just look at our coverage and look at our history of performance and our confidence in the future, I think it does bring up the question, is there possibilities for more? But at the 2% that we set right now, we’re sitting in a really good position where it gives us the ability as our business continues to perform, we can allocate that in different fashions.

Got it. Thanks, Joe.

Our next question comes from Spiro Dounis with Citi.

Hi, this is Chad on for Spiro. Just one question for me. Just curious with the distribution growth commencing, does this change anything about the way the IDR features view at SUN?

Chad, this is Joe. No, I think like every company, we have multiple stakeholders, and ET is one of them. They have been an incredibly supportive GP and also very patient. So our obvious goal is to create value for all our stakeholders. And I think our track record shows we’ve done that. And more importantly, on a going forward path, we intend to create value on a going-forward basis for all our stakeholders.

Okay. That makes sense. That’s it for me. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Ned Baramov with Wells Fargo.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. You mentioned growth opportunities in and around the acquired Zenith assets. Could you maybe talk about the CapEx requirement around these opportunities and maybe the time frame of the potential investments?

Yes. Ned, in our updated guidance, as I have mentioned in my prepared remarks, really those changes all had to do with the Zenith acquisition. And so there is some maintenance capital that comes along with those assets, but there is not any material growth capital necessarily associated with these assets, which is why we didn’t update our growth capital guidance.

Got it. And then I guess on your updated OpEx, maintenance CapEx and EBITDA guidance ranges that does reflect the Zenith acquisition, but any change on how you think about volumes and margins for 2023?

Yes. As we sit right here, I mean we just finished four months of the year. We have eight months left, and we still feel really good about the guidance that we put together back in December. If you look back at that, right, we modified how we gave guidance a little bit in that in the past, we gave volume and margin ranges, where this year, we just gave a kind of singular volume target and a singular margin target, not that we expected that, that was exactly where we were going to end up, but we thought that, that was a good midpoint when you multiply those together for our fuel gross profit. And so as we sit here now, we are still comfortable with that and don’t think there is anything that would materially change that. As I have talked in the past, there might be a slightly different path. So, if volumes are a little stronger than we assumed and margins are a little weaker or vice versa, we still expect to come in the same range of gross profit and EBITDA.

Thanks for that. That’s all I had.

You bet.

[Operator Instructions] And our next question comes from John Royall with JPMorgan.

Hi guys. Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. So, the Zenith acquisition looks like it’s spread across some different geographies and kind of begs the question on that front, recognizing there is some interplay here with driving growth in the distribution business, do you have a focus geographically at this point on maybe where you think you have some holes that you would like to fill on the acquisition side?

Hi John, this is Joe. Yes. I think as far as geographically, it still comes down to, I think some pretty basic criteria that we look at when it comes to acquisitions. Stable income, alright, that’s one, growth opportunities and so – and synergies. So, if you look at those three, I think layering on top of our existing geographies, that could – that would fit the criteria and also new geographies. When we did Puerto Rico, that was obviously outside our geography. But we thought it was stable income. We saw growth opportunities. And for more from kind of an administrative side, we saw synergies. So, I think those are probably the more overriding criteria versus just being focused on one particular geography versus another.

That makes sense. Thanks Joe. And then maybe a higher level question. You guys have had good insights in the past on kind of the structural trends around gasoline demand and miles traveled and how they are impacted by COVID and work-from-home dynamics. I was wondering if you have any thoughts on, are we permanently impaired in gasoline demand from sticky work-from-home dynamics? And then maybe if you stripped out acquisitions, where is your business today from a volume perspective on kind of same-store sales relative to 2019?

Yes. John, it’s a really good question. And I think many of us in the industry have been thinking about that and looking at our own volumes over the last few years. And I would say, for the most part, our network is in line with the numbers you can see publicly where there is a – you are still off versus 2019 on the gasoline side and even off versus last year. And so our strategy has been that, one, with the higher breakeven margins, we think that more than compensates on the overall gross profit side. And then we feel like it’s an opportunity for us to pick up market share, whether it’s through acquisitions like we did in the last 12 months with Gladieux and Peerless with the criteria that Joe just talked about, or whether through it’s our organic growth capital or whether it’s through just commercial activity. So, as far as the drivers behind that fuel demand, you look at – by a lot of measures, vehicle miles traveled is pretty close to what it was in 2019. If you look back in the history of the last 15 years, it’s generally been an upward trend in overall fuel efficiency. And so we have seen that pick up slightly over the last couple of years. But I don’t know that our crystal ball is necessarily a lot clearer than anyone else’s on exactly what’s going to happen. So, for us, it’s really about the stability of our portfolio, where, even with different scenarios, we can put up predictable results.

And John, I will add a couple of things to that. I think what Karl said is that, if you look at our base business, it’s probably tracking similarly very close to the U.S. average. But obviously, as evident by the number we put up in the first quarter, our growth capital is working. So, we are outpacing the U.S. average materially. As far as, I guess the heart of your question about kind of overall U.S. trends, I think there is probably one data point I think the Street should probably consider as far as potential upside for overall U.S. volume. One of the data metrics that we track is from a company called Kastle with the K. And they are the office security and access company, everybody has kind of a key code that allows you into office. They track the 10 biggest metro markets in the U.S., and they track it from pre-COVID to kind of say, on a monthly basis. Right now, we are still sitting 50% of pre-COVID level of people actually coming to the office. If you have – if you make an assumption that more people are going to start – that work from home is going to become less and people are going to come into the office more, I think that does give the industry more upside when it comes to volume returning.

Very helpful. Thank you.

We are closing our question-and-answer session. Now, I would like to turn the floor back over to Scott Rachel for closing comments. Please go ahead.

Thanks everyone for joining us on the call this morning. As always, if you have any follow-up questions, feel free to reach out to me. Thanks.

This concludes today’s conference call. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation and have a great day.