Sure, Patricio. And hello, Yuri. Let me give some more details in order to answer your question regarding cost of risk and provisions. As you mentioned, for the bank, which is 94% of our loan portfolio, we apply IFRS 9 and the expected loss model for the impairment of financial instruments. Following this rule, we have our expected loss models, which are reviewed periodically, and during the second quarter, we enhance out our models adding new economic variables that better predict consumer or corporate behavior and the probability of default. We added, for example, the Economic Activity Indicator, the EMAA, and so, these require, for us, higher provisions which is what you see in our increased coverage ratio, in our increased total provisions to total loan book of 7.7% and this AR$560 million provisions that were mentioned earlier. We also updated our macro-economic scenarios and we expect to do that continuously, always continuously reviewing our macro assumptions in our forecasts, and for instance, GDP growth in the first quarter, we had a negative 3% in our basic scenario and a negative 6% in a pessimistic scenario. Now we updated those values to negative 6% and negative 11% in our basic scenario and negative almost 15% in a pessimistic scenario. So, we weigh those scenarios based on the probability of occurrence, and of course, they give us a higher probability of the fall for certain customers and increased provision. So, now we are comfortable with the levels of provisions we have as of June 30 as we took a careful look on our expected models as I said before, and we also carried out a top-down analysis by industry sectors. So, we are weighing differently each sector based on the exposure which we believe is high or very high to COVID and related measures. It's important also to bear in mind the collateral of our portfolio, which of course, the impact in the level of provisions required by IFRS 9. So, for example, 44% of our commercial loans are collateralized while 66% of the NPLs in the commercial loans portfolio are collateralized. So, this continues to be very dynamic. We continue to review our models our forecasts and we’ll continue also to build up provisions during the third quarter and that's what we did. For example, in July where we increased also our coverage ratio even when our NPLs are still stable or even declining. So, you may see our cost of risk begin maybe in the next quarter or during the second half of the year until we reach a point where we start to use those provisions instead of creating more coverage, but it's still very dynamic.