Good morning, and welcome to the Service Properties Trust Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to Kevin Barry, Senior Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you for joining us today. With me on the call are Chris Bilotto, President and Chief Executive Officer; Jesse Abair, Vice President; and Brian Donley, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer. In just a moment, they will provide details about our business and our performance for the third quarter of 2025, followed by a question-and-answer session with sell-side analysts. I would like to note that the recording and retransmission of today's conference call is prohibited without the prior written consent of the company. Also note that today's conference call contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other securities laws. These forward-looking statements are based on SEC's beliefs and expectations as of today, November 6, 2025, and actual results may differ materially from those that we project. The company undertakes no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to the forward-looking statements made in today's conference call. Additional information concerning factors that could cause those differences is contained in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which can be accessed from our website at svcreit.com or the SEC's website. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance upon any forward-looking statements. In addition, this call may contain non-GAAP financial measures, including normalized funds from operations or normalized FFO and adjusted EBITDAre. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP figures to net income is available in SVC's earnings release presentation that we issued last night, which can be found on our website. And finally, we are providing guidance on this call, including adjusted hotel EBITDA. We are not providing a reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure as part of our guidance because certain information required for such reconciliation is not available without unreasonable efforts or at all. With that, I will turn the call over to Chris.

Thank you, Kevin. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining the call today. Last night, we announced our third quarter earnings results, which reflect continued momentum on our strategic objectives. I will begin today's call with a brief update on our key initiatives and share operating highlights from both our hotel and net lease businesses. Jesse will provide further details on our net lease platform and recent acquisitions. Brian will then discuss our financial performance, balance sheet and quarterly guidance. Starting with our strategic priorities. We had another productive quarter, completing previously announced hotel sales, advancing our capital recycling initiatives and taking decisive steps to strengthen SVC's balance sheet. Since our last earnings call, we have been active in the capital markets, raising over $850 million in proceeds, including $295 million from asset sales during the quarter, $67 million in asset sales in the months of October and November, and approximately $490 million from the issuance of our new zero-coupon bonds. The proceeds were used to fully repay our revolving credit facility and retire all of our 2026 senior notes. Each of these steps further improved SVC's debt maturity profile, enhanced our financial flexibility and strengthened our covenant position. Turning to current dispositions. Earlier this year, we committed to exiting 121 hotels totaling nearly 16,000 keys for gross proceeds of $959 million. We remain on track to complete the balance of these sales, including 6 hotels that sold in October for $66.5 million and 69 hotel sales expected to close in November and December for $567.5 million. Proceeds from these remaining sales will primarily be used to initiate the repayment of our February 2027 senior unsecured notes. With respect to acquisitions, we continue to advance modest growth supporting our net lease portfolio, which Jesse will expand upon. This is…

Thanks, Chris. In support of SVC's strategic shift toward the net lease space, during the quarter we continued to focus on portfolio growth and curation, driven largely by our acquisition platform. Although they will remain relatively modest in the near term, our acquisitions are intended to scale our net lease business, optimize portfolio composition and unlock value through accretive financing opportunities. Our investment thesis continues to revolve around necessity-based e-commerce-resistant retail assets that offer strong rent coverage and require minimal capital investment. During the third quarter, we acquired 13 net lease properties for a total of $24.8 million. Accounting for closings subsequent to quarter end, year-to-date investments totaled $70.6 million. These deals have been funded with a combination of cash on hand and proceeds from net lease dispositions. Our 2025 transactions to date have a weighted average lease term of 14.2 years, average rent coverage of 2.6x and an average going-in cash cap rate of 7.4%. Consistent with our investment criteria, the acquisitions include a balanced mix of quick service and casual dining restaurants, automotive services, fitness and value retailers. At quarter end, SVC's net lease portfolio consisted of 752 properties with annual minimum rents of $389 million. The portfolio was more than 97% leased with a weighted average lease term of 7.5 years. We have 178 tenants operating under 139 brands across 21 distinct industries. Aggregate rent coverage was just over 2x for the trailing 12 months, unchanged compared to the prior quarter. From a credit quality perspective, 2/3 of our annual minimum rents come from TA Travel centers backed by investment-grade rated BP. Rent coverage at these assets was also stable compared to the prior quarter. Annualized base rent increased 2.3% and NOI increased 50 basis points year-over-year, largely a function of our recent acquisition activity. Our asset management team executed 10 leases this quarter, totaling 187,000 square feet and averaging over 10 years of term. Looking ahead, we have a robust pipeline of investment opportunities aimed at further enhancing portfolio metrics with respect to tenant and geographic diversity, weighted average lease term and coverage ratios. To that end, we are currently under agreement to acquire 5 additional properties totaling $25 million, which we expect to close in the fourth quarter. Incremental disciplined growth will continue to be the focus for the net lease side of the business, generating reliable cash flows designed to endure throughout economic cycles. And with that, I'll turn it over to Brian to discuss our financial results.

Thank you, Jesse, and good morning. Starting with our consolidated financial results for the third quarter of 2025, normalized FFO was $33.9 million or $0.20 per share versus $0.32 per share in the prior year quarter. Adjusted EBITDAre decreased $10 million year-over-year to $145 million. Overall financial results this quarter as compared to the prior year quarter were primarily impacted by a $13.1 million decline in adjusted hotel EBITDA and an $8.7 million increase in interest expense. For our 160 comparable hotels this quarter, RevPAR increased by 20 basis points, gross operating profit margin percentage declined by 330 basis points to 24.4%. Below the GOP line, costs at our comparable hotels increased 7.6% from the prior year, driven by insurance claims at certain hotels. Our hotel portfolio generated adjusted hotel EBITDA of $44.3 million, a decline of 18.9% from the prior year as a result of softer demand and expense pressures. These results came in below the low end of our hotel EBITDA guidance range by $9.7 million, primarily due to a $6.6 million impact from hotels sold prior to September 30 and a $2.9 million impact from fire-related disruption at 2 full-service hotels. The 76 Sonesta exit hotels not yet sold as of quarter end generated RevPAR of $72, a decline of 1%, and adjusted hotel EBITDA of $8.3 million, a decline of $3.2 million year-over-year. The 84 hotels in our retained portfolio generated RevPAR of $114, an increase of 60 basis points year-over-year, and adjusted hotel EBITDA of $36 million during the quarter, a decrease of $7 million year-over-year. Most of the decline year-over-year in the retained portfolio is related to elevated labor costs, repairs and insurance expenses. Turning to our expectations for Q4. We are currently projecting fourth quarter RevPAR of $86 to $89 and adjusted hotel…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Jack Armstrong of Wells Fargo.

We're coming up on the halfway point in Q4 and there's still 69 hotels left to get done by year-end. How realistic is it that all these are going to close in time? Based on our prior conversations, the operators that are picking them up can only handle so much at a time from an operational perspective there. So curious your thoughts on the actual execution there.

Yes. Thanks for the question. This is Chris. I think as we've talked about historically, with respect to these sales, there was a phased negotiation or a rolling close with an outside date in December, meaning kind of the last close would occur across all the assets in December. And so I think the best way to look at it is right now, based on information we have, we're tracking to close 40% to 50% of the remaining balance in November. And then the rest will be in December, no later than the outside closing date. So everything planned for 2025.

Okay. And if they don't close by the closing date, kind of what's the procedure there? What should we expect?

Well, contractually, they're obligated to close. And so if for some reason, they don't close, then there's deposits and other remedies at risk. So again, I think that's -- at this stage, just given where we are and the work we've done, I think that I would view that as highly unlikely.

Okay. And then you took a $27 million impairment in the quarter. Can you talk about what that was in relation to and the likelihood of further impairments as we get through the rest of these sales?

Jack, this is Brian. That was more shifting of the purchase price allocations amongst the portfolios. I wouldn't read too much into it. Overall, we're still on track to produce a significant book gain on these sales. Most of it -- all of the rest of it will be a gain in the fourth quarter. Again, a lot of these contracts and the way the sales were phased in with the individual purchase prices and how those are allocated amongst the portfolio ended up resulting in that impairment. But it's -- again, I think it's more noise than anything.

Okay. And then last one for me. Rent coverage continues to decline in the travel center portfolio. Do you have an expectation of when or if that might improve? And at what level of coverage would you say it's concerning to you, acknowledging that it's guaranteed by BT?

Yes. Jack, this is Jesse. I'll take that. I mean, certainly we're seeing a couple of sequential quarters of degradation in the TA coverage. I think some of that is just kind of we're rolling off that kind of post-COVID high with respect to the freight demand driving a lot of their business. It does seem to be moderating that decline and kind of flattening out, particularly within the last couple of quarters. So given the BT credit backing of those leases, I don't think we're particularly concerned at this point. We're in regular contact with TA. We continue to see them invest in the sites and continue to make them more competitive. So I think it's something we're watching, but I don't think anything above one, it doesn't drive us towards any particular degree of concern at this point.

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Tyler Batory of Oppenheimer.

A couple on the hotel portfolio first. And I'm just trying to evaluate the performance during Q3. I know lots of moving pieces with asset sales and whatnot. So just talk about how the EBITDA specifically came in versus your expectations internally. I know it was a little bit below the guidance, but I'm not sure perhaps how much of that was driven by asset sales and some of the other moving pieces you have going on right now.

Tyler, it's Brian. Thank you for the question. I think from the disposition standpoint, the timing of those sales and when they close was the biggest driver. When we provide the guidance and the guidance I provided today for the fourth quarter, doesn't assume asset sales because we can't always predict the exact timing and how much earnings will come off the plate. So about, just call it, $7 million, I think, is the number for sales from what we had guided for Q3. There were some other onetime impacts in the quarter. We had a couple of insuranceable events, fires at a couple of properties in New Orleans. There was an electrical fire that caused significant disruption. We also had a fire on Silicon Valley, same story. It took -- the hotel was closed for days. And then there's just been general disruption from reopening and some other renovation disruption. Some softness in Cambridge, for example, was a big driver this quarter at our Royal Sonesta. So there's different stories within the story. But I think to Chris' point in his remarks, there is definitely a softness in the industry and the travel industry in general. We continue to see cost pressures. So put all of that together is where we landed.

Okay. And then just to follow up that in terms of the guide for Q4, helpful to hear that that doesn't assume any asset sales. But when I just look at the sequential progression Q4 versus Q3, the seasonality is a little bit worse than normal. If I'm doing my math right, it implies about a high single-digit EBITDA margin there. Just talk a little bit about kind of what's going on in Q4 and just what you're seeing in terms of travel trends, costs, et cetera, moving into the fourth quarter that's informing that guide.

Yes. I mean I think at a very high level, from the travel trends, things have generally moderated quite a bit. Where we are seeing kind of some pockets are with respect to kind of the group pace. I think overall, we expect that to be up 3% for the year, give or take $5 million. And then we're also starting to kind of see some opportunities with contract business, more specifically at a lot of the renovated hotels. And so that's providing additional lift. But I think we -- a lot of our business comes from the OTA market. That market too is getting a little bit more competitive, which is putting pressure on rates just given as travel demand has lessened more broadly, there's just a lot more brands exercising that market. So there's disruption on that front, let alone just kind of with the broader industry. And again, with the bright spots being progress we're seeing from the renovated hotels and then more specifically on group and contract business. And then on the EBITDA side, Brian, I don't know if you want to add any more color there.

No. I mean I think it's really the combination of what we've been seeing in the last few quarters with continued cost pressures lower demands, the seasonality in Q4, we're also taking out our focused service hotels, which had much more of a smoother trend, if you will, across all 4 quarters. It's a little more steeper bell curve for our full-service hotels coming into Q4, and that's a typical pattern for our portfolio as we sell these hotels. And then the impact of the rest of the dispositions, as we talked about, as Chris mentioned, that most of these properties are going to close in November and December. So how much EBITDA we retain versus leaving the system still remains to be determined based on timing. But there will be a similar impact to Q4's EBITDA removing hotels and raising those proceeds for us.

Okay. Great. And then moving on, could you talk a little bit more about some of the recent movements on the debt side, just the rationale behind doing the zero-coupon bonds. And I know it's a little while until you have upcoming maturities, but it's always something that people are focused on. So just kind of talk about how you're thinking about strategically handling those in the future.

Sure, Tyler. The zero-coupon bond, the primary goal there was to give us some headroom with our covenants, specifically the 1.5x interest coverage, the minimum coverage. So we get the benefit of having zero-coupon interest to that covenant. So we got an immediate lift. And we drew down the revolver in July to protect liquidity because if we're below that 1.5x, we can't use the revolver. It's an incurrence test, incurrence of debt, including borrowing from the line of credit. So we had drawn down the line defensively in July. We started working through the strategies as we saw hotel EBITDA slipping further as the quarter moved on, executed on the zero-coupon transaction. We've repaid our '26 notes and we brought ourselves back in check. So those are the primary drivers. The zero-coupon bond basically gives us 2 years of runway on our debt maturities, our next debt maturity. Once we complete the rest of these asset sales, we're paying off the early '27 notes that are coming due in February '27. So our next debt maturity will be those zero-coupons in September of 2027.

The next question comes from John Massocca of B. Riley Securities.

Maybe just a quick clarifying question on the guidance. Does that include the impact of host health sales closed quarter-to-date?

No. We just -- the projection is based on the portfolio as of September 30. So the few hotels shouldn't make a big difference, the ones we've closed so far, but it just assumes all 76 that haven't sold are still in those numbers.

Okay. And then as you think of kind of the pro rata impact of sales in 4Q and maybe even the final impact coming into 2026, is the overall amount of hotel EBITDA you expect to kind of lose in these sales still at the $53 million or so mark you laid out in August?

Roughly. I mean, yes, I mean, it's hard to predict what those would have done without the sales process impacting those properties. But generally speaking, around $50 million is the right number for the whole portfolio.

And then in terms of hotel sales, it sounds like everything is expected to be wrapped up by the end of this year. What's the outlook for potential further dispositions in 2026, particularly given you're not going to have debt repayment needs until '27? Could we expect another strategic process maybe as you look at the zero-coupon bonds? I know they're secured by net lease assets, but just kind of curious as to the opportunity set for more hotel dispositions. Could it be structural like it was this year? Or is it going to be more opportunistic going forward?

Yes. So the short answer is we are planning to continue with dispositions in 2026. As I mentioned kind of in my prepared remarks, we have a quantum of hotels that are negative EBITDA drags and these are on the full service side. And our initial plan is just to focus on a portion of those for launch of a sale earlier in the year. And we're going to kind of take a more incremental approach to kind of how we think about layering in the sales. I think it's important just to note, I mean, selling negative EBITDA hotels in itself takes time. And given kind of the overall backdrop of where the hotel kind of performance is going more kind of sector related, we just want to strike the right balance of timing to be focused on transactions. So it will be very much incremental in next year, but with the caveat that we will be selling hotels. And our plan is to really provide more definitive information as we round out the year, likely with our NAREIT presentation update on kind of the hotels themselves, how much in proceeds we expect, how much negative EBITDA in the cases for the initial round, we expect to see come off the books when these transact and other details supporting that initiative.

Okay. I appreciate that detail. And then one last kind of one on the hotel front, purely the hotel front. The margin decline kind of quarter-over-quarter obviously, but even year-over-year, was that just driven by some of the fire disruption and insurance issues you talked about earlier on the call? Or were there other kind of factors going into that?

Yes, that's part of it. I think labor continues to be a big headline number for us and for every hotel company, frankly, continued growth in wages and benefit costs, market impacts, the availability of labor has a bigger outsized recurring impact to the portfolio and some of these other things. These insurance items were definitely an impact this quarter, but eventually, we'll get some business interruption proceeds, but that process takes a long time to offset. So there are other costs within the portfolio that continue to weigh on margins as revenues have been relatively flat.

Okay. And then on the CapEx guidance, I appreciate all the detail. It still feels like the 2025 CapEx guidance is calling for a pretty significant ramp in 4Q versus what you've done in the last 3 quarters. Is there something driving that, particularly now that the Nautilus renovations are going to move to 2026 purely?

Yes. There's a significant amount of stuff that we have in the pipeline at various hotels that will have an outsized impact, including one of our large Royal Sonestas in Cambridge. We're starting a renovation project there that will carry through into next year. Same thing down in New Orleans. The Nautilus, the biggest part and the actual swinging of hammers and doing the rooms and the public space will happen next year, but there's still a significant amount of dollars going out the door in fourth quarter by FF&E releases and that sort of thing as well as other maintenance type capital that we're working through across the portfolio. So yes, it is outsized compared to the trend and -- but that's part of the rationale why we brought the guidance way down.

And diversely kind of on a 2-year stack, I think the way guidance kind of changed is calling for overall CapEx to decline. Is that just a product of hotel sales? Or is there something else going on there where you're thinking you need less CapEx spend?

Certainly, having less hotels, there will be less overall capital. But I think generally speaking, we have less kind of renovations planned during the year and just bringing down kind of the overall capital spend. So I think net-net, it's focused on just trying to kind of be more strategic about the deployment of capital going into the year. So this is -- Brian kind of alluded to the numbers going into 2026, and we'll continue to evaluate that with the goal that we can kind of see further reductions in out years as well.

Okay. And just to be clear, the CapEx spend guidance does take into account the asset sales, correct?

Correct. We're not projecting anything related to those sale of hotels.

No, no, I meant -- so I guess the number for 2026 includes assets that are planned to be sold. Or is that -- are you factoring in the fact you're going to sell these assets before you need to spend CapEx on them?

Yes, correct. Yes. So it's -- I guess we'll answer it in 2 parts. For the '25 dispositions and the capital guidance, that's all factored in. There's no capital with -- specifically tied to what we're selling at this stage, just given where we are in the process. The capital guide for 2026, it's going to have some capital for the hotels we're selling. I mean, by the time we transact on those hotels, we're going to have to continue to make sure we're taking care of any mission-critical work. So there's going to be some numbers in there. But as we dial into the timing of the sales, then we would kind of rightsize that number. But I wouldn't view that as kind of an outsized amount that would fall off given some of those initial sales.

Okay. And then maybe as we think about '26, bigger picture, is there a leverage target you kind of have in mind post some of these continued hotel dispositions?

Yes. I think with the completion of the 113 Sonesta sales, we've been quoting one full turn off of leverage when the dust settles, and that's still where we expect things to shake out. On the flip side, as you've seen in these numbers, EBITDA has eroded a little bit and really depends on where we come in next year, short of any other sales. So from a leverage target standpoint, we're going to -- when we get more specific as far as what we might sell in '26 in some of the full-service hotels and what the EBITDA impact is to the portfolio, we'll have more clarity on that. But at this time, the full turn of leverage from what we've done this year is sort of the benchmark in the short term.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Chris Bilotto, President and Chief Executive Officer, for any closing remarks.

Thank you, everybody, for joining the call today. We look forward to seeing many of you at NAREIT in December. Please reach out to our Investor Relations team if you're interested in scheduling a meeting with SVC. That concludes our call.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.