Ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon. At this time, I'd like to welcome everyone to the Theravance Biopharma Conference Call. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the company's formal remarks. [Operator Instructions] Today's conference call is being recorded. And now, I'd like to turn the call over to Renee Gala, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, everyone and thank you for joining our Third Quarter 2016 Financial Results Conference Call and Webcast. With me on the call today are Rick Winningham, Chief Executive Officer; and Brett Haumann, Chief Medical Officer. Following our prepared remarks, we will open the call for questions.. A copy of the press release can be downloaded from our Web site or you can call Investor Relations at 650-808-4045 and we'll be happy to assist you. Before we get started, we'd like to remind you that this conference call will contain forward-looking statements which involve certain risks and uncertainties including statements about our product top line, pipeline, expected benefits of our products and the anticipated timing of trial results and regulatory filings, and expected financial results. Information concerning factors that could cause results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements are described further in the company's filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission. And now, I'd like to hand the call over to Rick Winningham. Rick?

Thanks, Renee. Good afternoon, everyone and thank you for joining us. 2016 continues to unfold as an important year for Theravance Biopharma. We were extremely pleased to announce in October positive results from two pivotal Phase 3 efficacy studies of Revefenacin for the treatment of COPD. The Revefenacin program exemplifies our strategy of discovering and developing localized medicines for localized diseases and as a testament to our ability to execute on our goals and milestones. We're also excited by the progress of our two early-stage programs, TD-1473, our intestinally restricted JAK inhibitor for which we initiated a Phase 1b study in ulcerative colitis patients and TD-0714 for our potential best-in-class I Neprilysin inhibitor, which successfully completed Phase 1 multiple ascending dose study, clearing the way for further development. We remain focused on executing our commercial and label expansion strategies for VIBATIV. We are also continuing to track real-world experience from our TOUR registry, which highlights the use of VIBATIV in a range of difficult to treat infections. Additionally, we have multiple programs progressing in mid-stage clinical development, including Velusetrag in Phase 2b -- in a Phase 2b study for gastroparesis. TD-9855 in a Phase 2a proof-of-concept study in neurogenic orthostatic hypotension and TD 8954 or TAK-954, which Takeda is advancing in patients with enteral feeding intolerance. We believe our pipeline of proprietary and partnered assets are in our economic interest and certain respiratory programs being developed by GSK and at Aviva combined with a strong balance sheet and numerous upcoming milestones are enabling us to build a strong foundation for developing differentiated therapies and creating value for shareholders. First I will turn the call over to Brett, who will discuss our priority programs. Then Renée will review our third quarter financial results and our economic interests. And I'll conclude with a brief update on our commercial business and our upcoming milestones. Brett?

Thanks, Rick. I will start with TD-1473, our novel important [ph] early administered and intentionally restricted JAK inhibitor. 1473 is being developed to treat a range of inflammatory bowel diseases including ulcerative colitis and debilitating disease of the lining of the colon that affects roughly 700,000 patients a year in the U.S. Our goal is to develop a treatment option for ulcerative colitis and other inflammatory bowel diseases with a highly favorable therapeutic index and a clinically meaningful benefits. Our JAK inhibitors are designed to remain localized in the intestine to minimize exposure in the systemic circulation and to avoid immunosuppressive liability. This represents a potential novel approach to treating ulcerative colitis, including the potential to be used in patients earlier in the course of a disease, ahead of injectable biological agents. In October, we dose the first patients in our Phase 1b trial of 1473 in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. This follows the successful completion of the phase 1a single and multiple ascending dose studies in healthy volunteers. The primary aim of the Phase 1b patient study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of 1473, as well as to measure the drug levels in the blood following oral administration. An important secondary objective of the trial is to evaluate the early effects of 1473 on a range of relevant ulcerative colitis biomarkers, technological improvements, and measures of both endoscopic and clinical improvements. The findings from this Phase 1b trial will inform our future clinical development plans for 1473. We expect data from the Phase 1b trial to be available in mid-2017. The totality of the safety and PK data generated in the program to date provide support for our strategy of targeting JAK inhibition to inflamed tissues within the intestinal tract in order to achieve desired therapeutic…

Thank you, Brett. and Revenue for the third quarter of 2016 was $19.1 million comprised of revenue from collaborative arrangements totaling $15.2 million and U.S net product sales of VIBATIV of $3.9 million. Revenue from collaborative arrangements is principally due to the recognition of the $15 million upfront payment from Tekada for the license of TD-8954. R&D expenses for the third quarter of 2016 were $32 million representing an increase of $1.6 million compared to the same period in 2015. The increase is primarily attributed to costs associated with the progression of our priority programs. SG&A expenses for the third quarter of 2016 or 20.3 million representing a decrease of $2.6 million compared to the same period in 2015. The decrease is driven by lower costs associated with share-based compensation and timing of other expenses. Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities excluding restricted cash totaled $289.3 million as of September 30, 2016. The quarter end cash balance excludes $22.7 million in total receivables from collaborative arrangements, primarily associated with the mile in collaboration and approximately $316 million in net proceeds from the Company's recent concurrent public offering of ordinary shares and convertible notes. From a guidance perspective, we anticipate our operating loss excluding share-based compensation will be approximately $140 million for the full-year of 2016. The actual amount could be above or below our forecast as a result of a variety of factors including the rate of enrollment in our clinical studies, spending rates to prepare for planned clinical studies and fourth quarter revenue. Now I will provide a brief update on our economic interests related to the GSK respiratory program. During their quarterly earnings call last month, GSK stated they are on track to file the Closed Triple for COPD in the fourth quarter. In both the U.S and the EEU. Based on their communicated timelines, we could begin receiving cash flow as related to this program as early as 2018. GSK is investing in multiple clinical programs to support the success of this product in both COPD and asthma. The Phase 3 fulfill study and approximately 1,800 COPD patients reported positive results earlier this year. The Phase 3 impact study evaluating the Closed Triple in approximately 10,000 COPD patients is expected to complete in 2017. In addition, JFK recently began recruiting for a 2,200 patient study of the Closed Triple in asthma. GSK disclosed this Phase 3 study is expected to complete in early 2018 to support a regulatory filing in the U.S also in 2018. As a reminder, GSK will pay upward-tiering royalties ranging from 6.5% to 10% on worldwide net sales of the Closed Triple and Theravance Biopharma hold an 85% economic interest in those future potential cash flow. Importantly, GSK is responsible for all development and commercialization costs related to the Closed Triple with no cost being born by Theravance Biopharma. Now I will turn the call back over to Rick.

Thanks, Renee. Before reviewing our upcoming milestones, I will provide a brief update on our acute care business. We continue to make progress in implementing our commercial strategy for VIBATIV. We are working to gain traction in all target acute-care settings, including hospital and outpatient settings and infusion centers, which can serve as an important site of care post discharge. our TOUR registry is enrolling rapidly with over 600 of the 1,000 patients enrolled to date. Interim data from TOUR were presented at IDWeek at the end of October and highlighted the real-world experience with VIBATIV in a range of difficult to treat infections. An initial review of the data from the first 200 patients enrolled in TOUR, showed VIBATIV to be generally well-tolerated and demonstrates a clinical response rate that were in line with our expectation and comparable to data included in our current label. In addition, findings show that the most frequent primary infections treated with VIBATIV were complicated skin and skin structure infections, bone and joint infections, bacteremia and pneumonia. For these infections, the underlying pathogen was most often identified as Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus or MRSA. Methicillin Susceptible Staph Aureus or MSSA or coagulase negative staphylococci. We are pleased with the progress of our TOUR study and look forward to generating additional data that can further inform the best use of VIBATIV in the clinical setting. As we’ve noted in the past, label expansion remains a key priority for VIBATIV with the goal of optimizing the product's commercial and therapeutic potential. Our 250 patient Phase 3 registrational study in primary bacteremia is ongoing and is expected to complete in 2018. In addition to our commercial activities to support VIBATIV, we and our partner Mylan are collaborating on the detailed commercial planning for Revefenacin. As the first…

Thank you, sir. [Operator Instructions] We will have our first question from Geoffrey Porges of Leerink Partners. Your line is now open.

Thank you very much and congratulations on all the progress this quarter. Rick, I just want to focus on the JAK program for a moment. Could you give us a little bit more color on what you're seeing is the difference between the two molecule for your advancing 1473 and 714? And is there something that we should anticipate that you should continue to take forward or you think that will leave off into different indications or is it sort of a way of hedging your best [ph] in terms of two shots on the opportunity? That would be helpful. And then, could you just give a little bit more color -- I’m sorry, I joined the call late, a little bit more color on the timing for when you might be into Phase 1b or Phase 2 trial in the other indications that you alluded to, which cause other companies pursuing?

Sure. I assume, Geoff, that second question is also related to the JAK program?

That’s correct, yes.

Okay. So, just on the first question related to 1473 and then 3504, of course 1473 is a compound that has pan JAK activity. JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, as well as three as well as TYK2. 3504 is a specially designed Prodrug of Tofacitinib that’s designed to release only in the intestine, therefore minimizing the systemic exposure of Tofacitinib. So the compounds are different. They’ve different activity. 3504 having less TYK2 activity, importantly because that TYK2 has been implicated in the treatment of Crohn's. So it may be important to have TYK2 activity to have a higher probability of success in the treatment of Crohn's disease. Traditionally, at Theravance, we bring more than one compound into the clinic to course aggressively manage the uncertainty that’s inherent in any development program. Here we have a little bit more special opportunity in the 3504 courses once the CAP more or less the chemical CAP is cleaved, you're dealing with a known JAK inhibitor Tofacitinib you’re just dealing with that known JAK inhibitor in a space that’s primarily restricted to the intestine so -- and 1473 is a novel JAK inhibitor, so there's an inherent difference there in the drug, in the body of knowledge around each compound. I will now turn it over to Brett, to add to my comments. Brett?

Thanks, Rick. I think just one thing to add, Geoff. You may, if you follow the [indiscernible] Tofacitinib has demonstrated success in ulcerative colitis. And so that gives us confidence that the mechanism is precedented and that gives us confidence for both these molecules in ulcerative colitis 1473 and 3504. As Rick has mentioned, there are mechanistic reasons whereas potency reasons why 1473 could also work in Crohn's disease, but there is also a reason why 3504 might work in Crohn's and that relates to the dose of Tofacitinib that’s being used. Tofacitinib dose has been limited, we believe, to try and avoid some of the systemic risks, the immunosuppressive effect that Tofacitinib brings when higher doses are used. But indeed the ulcerative colitis program tested doses above 10 milligram twice-daily and in ulcerative colitis there was a suggestion that greater effect might be seen with high doses. That same phenomena may play in Crohn's disease and for that reason we’re still interested in the Tofacitinib is failed in Crohn's, we’re still interested in procuring this with 3504, because with a broader therapeutic index we may see utility in a disease where Tofacitinib has not been successful. You asked about the timing for upcoming …

That would be great, yes.

So the timing, we announced in our statements earlier on with the 1b study for 1473 is underway. We're dosing subjects. The 1b study for 3504 is planned for early in 2017 and obviously basing on -- based on what we see from those two will then progress into larger longer studies.

One of the things that is important to -- its important as we lay out strategy for this program more broadly as we accumulate information about the efficacy and the tolerability in the 1b is to be able to move quite rapidly into larger longer studies. And I think that's really what the first part of 2017, what we will be doing is we will be really laying the groundwork with the assumption that will be successful in the 1b for larger and longer studies in ulcerative colitis, potentially in Crohn's and then in checkpoint inhibitor colitis. And then we're also investigating a number of other inflammatory bowel diseases in special patient populations that may in fact benefit, because of the lack of immuno -- systemic immunosuppression that is present in our molecules. I will just turn over to Brett one more time to add anything else.

Yes. Thank you, Rick. I think we remain compelled by the opportunities in some of these discrete populations of patients, regrettably there were patients who are actually despite surgery to remove the colon once they’ve had inflammation, continue to have residual inflammation in the pouch that's created from the small intestine to really replace what’s been removed surgically. So there is a proportion of patients who have arthritis [ph] and we think that that is a particular population if we could evaluate the use of this product in. But that’s not to the exclusion of other indications as well. So we continue to evaluate a broad range of opportunities and we’re really excited about the prospects for both molecules.

Okay. Thanks very much, guys. I will get back in the queue.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Joshua Schimmer of Piper Jaffray. Your line is now open.

Great. Thanks for taking the questions. Maybe first to continue on 3504, do you freedom to operate with Tofacitinib Prodrug or that require some collaboration with Pfizer?

Yes, so I don’t want to get too deeply into the intellectual property, but of course Pfizer, there is a company Pfizer that does own -- does have a patent on Tofacitinib and clearly that would be something that we would have to take into account regarding the eventual commercialization of the product. But clearly given the length of time that we're talking about broadly with both 1473 and 3504, in progressing forward, we still believe that it's prudent to investigate the potential of 3504 in different inflammatory bowel diseases. Brett?

And just to add that or reiterate that this is a distinct and separate entity, so it releases active Tofacitinib with the Prodrug itself is a novel chemical entity.

Okay. And maybe just a couple of other quick questions. On VIBATIV, is there seasonality with VIBATIV franchise, kind of new to tracking it along, maybe you can explain the quarter-over-quarter decline?

Yes, great point. There is a bit of seasonality we saw a bit last year of the third quarter, that we present in the third quarter. I think seasonality is one and then I think the trends in surgical admissions probably comprise a bit of that variability from quarter-to-quarter.

Got it. And then, for other, I guess, Velusetrag or 8954, I believe there are 5-HT(4) receptors in the GI tract, since all of your core competencies is topical therapies. Do you have any plans or thoughts on the topical 5-HT(4) agonist or is that too paradoxical to consider in a gastroparesis setting?

Well, I don't know about it being paradoxical. I mean, there could potentially be an element of the medicines of fact that is in fact topical and then another element of the medicines in fact that its clearly driven by delivery of the drug through the bloodstream into the tissues, in the GI tract. I think our program in gastroparesis was really driven by not a topical approach, but really was driven by the systemic effects of that we could have with Velusetrag in gastroparesis and there are some precedents of 5-HT(4) agonist contributing to treatment in this particular condition and as you know and widely reported there are just or not very many good options here for patients that have gastroparesis, whether they have diabetic gastroparesis or idiopathic.

And just one point to add Josh, in the early stages of the disease of gastroparesis, unfortunately one of the dominant symptoms is vomiting. And so we actually in this setting topical application wouldn’t be ideal, we want to have systemic levels really to maximize the opportunity for absorption and minimize the chances of the drug being expelled before its working. So a good question, but I think for Velusetrag the strategy isn't around topical application, it has been a -- the motility of the [indiscernible] we’ve been focusing on.

Great. Thanks very much.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Umer Raffat of Evercore ISI. Your line is now open.

Thank you very much. Rick, I have a few questions today, if I may, but before that just to follow-up on Josh's question on VIBATIV. So I'm just looking at Dalvance or Bactiv, Teflaro, I don't see much seasonality on those franchises. So maybe just to get your perspective on what you’re seeing with VIBATIV? Just so we understand it better and how we model it better?

Sure. So, the one distinction there with VIBATIV relative to the other products is in fact hospital acquired pneumonia as opposed to community acquired pneumonia or complicated skin and skin structure infections, which we are seeing with some of the very long-acting medicines like Dalvance or Bactiv and then Teflaro, probably being used for more community acquired pneumonia as opposed to hospital acquired pneumonia.

Got it. That makes sense. Okay. So then getting to my questions now, a few. Number one, Rick, just very curious your thought process behind the recent financing and its timing relative to the last one. Just wondering to understand how you guys were thinking about the strategy and the timing? That’s number one. And secondly, on UC, my question is perhaps this is for, Brett, but I'm wondering how do you make a decision on what dose you’re going to choose for the next cohort? What data will you have to enable you to make that decision from the first cohort going into the second cohort? And then, finally on NEP inhibitor, I haven't seen, maybe I missed it, but I haven't seen you guys put out an announcement for a Phase 2. So I just want to understand why is that and what should we be expecting there?

Sure. So I will take the raisin and also bring Renee into the conversation and then turn it over to Brett for the other two. When you look at where we stand and the breadth and the depth, the pipeline of the Company, clearly we want to be in a position to move rapidly into longer, bigger studies particularly in the JAK program with --- that with data we think -- important data reading out into the Phase 1b, we want to be in a position to make commitments to longer-term studies at which the commitments would have -- probably have to be taking place in the third quarter, fourth quarter of next year, even if those -- these studies were in fact initiating late this year or early next year. We also, as Brett mentioned believe that there's an opportunity with the JAK program in smaller populations of inflammatory bowel disease that will be investigating through the course of this year and we want to put ourselves in a position to take advantage of those as the data from the program in the Phase 1b is reading out. I think when you look at particularly the first half of next year, but really extending throughout the entirety of next year, when you look at the number of milestones that we have whether it's from data coming out in the JAK program, data coming out in the Neprilysin program, particularly as we progress into the Phase 1 IV studies, the completion of the 12-month safety study with Revefenacin which we'd anticipate somewhere in the middle of next year and then an NDA filing in the latter part of next year. Velusetrag completing the Phase 2b study in gastroparesis sometime likely in the first half of next year and TD-9855 in neurogenic orthostatic hypotension is potential orphan indication also reading out potentially in the first half of next year. You just -- and then as data from VIBATIV continues to roll in, and our publications continue to roll in on TOUR and public presentations of data with Revefenacin, the number of financing windows that we really have in twice '17 are very small. So we wanted to be in a position to have a sizable amount of capital to enable us to move the JAK program and others rapidly through development and to be able to push and when we committed to those studies to have the capital to complete those. We are very excited about where we are with our pipeline, the data reading out and I think that a very well-capitalized Company one that's not dependent upon capital markets, not dependent on partners to advance these programs rapidly, will put us in a much stronger position to realize the value from the portfolio. Renée?

Yes, I think you’ve covered nicely in terms of why, maybe what all do is also comment on the context of what we decided to go into the market with which was something that with the concurrent offering leveraging the fact that there is very little supply in the convertible market and we felt that this was an instrument that we were pretty comfortable with being able to issue equity at a premium relative to what’s relevant to the convert and being confident to be able to do that based on cash flows that we see being generated in the future, both from the Closed Triple and other programs within our portfolio. And then I will also just touch just briefly, Rick's comment with respect to business development, we also want to be in a position of strength rather it be in negotiation of business development transactions, not have to rely on partnerships, because an ill-timed business development transaction can be in fact more dilutive than an equity offering. And also to be in a position where we could bring forward the breadth of the program, because if you followed our Company even prior at Theravance, Inc. we've never put the Company in a position where we had to go out and raise money. We really try to make sure that we're proactively thinking about the strategic objectives and ensuring that we can execute on those by being capitalized in a way that allows us to be able to simply go forward without having that risk hanging over the Company.

Brett?

Umer, you asked two questions. One on the JAK program, one on the NEP program. I will answer the JAK program first. You asked how do you choose a dose from your first cohort? You may recall that the design of our Phase 1 study is for sequential cohort. So we’re testing the first group, then we will evaluate a series of parameters and that will decide or inform our selection for the next dose. So what are those things? Well, they’re the obvious ones, is the drug well-tolerated at that dose? Protection from our Phase 1 program would suggest that the dose we’re evaluating which is below a 100 milligrams is going to be well-tolerated. But of course this is our first assessment [ph] in patients, so we’re going to be confirming that. I will remind you that we tested doses of up to 300 milligrams in our multiple dose study and up to a 1000 milligrams in our single dose study. So we think we’ve lot to cover for safety. One of the other important questions that was, does the drug get into the systemic circulation or not? And these are patients, there may be reasons why the drug moves into or through the colon definitely from healthy volunteers. That will determine our evaluation. And again inform whether we want to go up into or down. So last element there is biomarkers. There is preclinical evidence we have and them so many evidence from Tofacitinib as well that will give us a benchmark on what we should be seeing in terms of biomarker change. And again, if we see the effects that we are predicting, we may choose to go down and dose to see whether a lower dose achieves the same effect, we may choose to go up in dose to achieve a greater effect. So those are the source of parameters we will consider.

Okay.

You asked the question about the NEP inhibitor? I will just -- I will complete the answer to your question there too. So you asked about Phase 2 and why we haven't seen plans of Phase 2? I think even in today's communication was signaling that for the intravenous formulation where we see a path to an intravenous monotherapy. It's actually a position that we can confidently progress into the next stage, which is to evaluate safety and tolerability in healthy volunteers with an eye to moving into patients. The reason that we’ve not articulated the same strategy with the chronic indications is because as we’ve said that really depends on what we coupled the NEP inhibitor too. And so, an articulate strongly held position for the chronic indications does depend on us bringing that together with the best complimentary mechanism, either a novel, some of the mechanism and for that partnership is a key part of our strategy.

Got it. Thank you very much, Brett. And just a follow-up, Brett is partial Mayo score not one of your considerations when you decide the next dose?

It is. It's part of a series of things. I mentioned biomarkers, but -- as we alluded to in the call, we referenced endoscopy histological changes from biopsy and clinical measures as well.

We are hoping to really come through the Phase 1b, which -- with a very rich data set around efficacy of the compound as both directly observed changes as well as tissue biopsy, as well as biomarkers, both biomarkers within the colon and biomarker systemically. And I think the -- it's sort of the triangulation of all of these data sets that are going to provide us with the confidence of a dose range to go into larger longer studies.

Got it.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Louise Chen of Guggenheim Financial. Your line is now open.

Hi. Its Brandon Folkes on for Louise. A number of questions have been answered, but perhaps if you could just elaborate more around the market opportunity for Revefenacin and the market share you think you may be able to capture within that 9% nebulized market? Thank you.

Yes. So the opportunity here is really in that 9% of COPD patients that are on nebulizers for maintenance therapy. And keep in mind, that 9% is on nebulized for maintenance therapy without having a gold standard available to them in COPD, which is a long-acting muscarinic antagonist. So that we think we should be quite successful assuming that we see a continuation of the data that we saw in the efficacy studies come through in the 12-month safety study quite successful in the 9%. And then you sort of look at the market as a bit like layers outside of the 9% and cannily, because of what we've seen already of the efficacy of the drug on top of medicines that either a LABA or a LABA/ICS. Can we in fact grow beyond that core 9%, because of the drugs ease-of-use in any standard jet nebulizer and the fact that it's only dosed once a day. Brett?

Just to add to that, Brendon, I think the key impact for me is, if you look in the handheld space and look at the dominance of LAMA and the use of that as a cornerstone treatment, recognizing that there's nothing in that -- nothing equivalent to that in the nebulize space and you have still 9% of patients who can only use nebulized therapy, our view is that as we introduce the LAMA, as we introduced that standard of care, there is every opportunity to see that sizes of market growth. Bear in mind to that it's defined mainly at the moment by either a very short acting agents or LABA. And in our in Phase 3 data is demonstrated that the LAMA we’re testing could be used on top of existing LABA therapy. So there is every opportunity not only to use the current base, but actually could grow.

Great. Thanks so much and congratulations on the progress this year.

Thank you,

Thank you.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from a follow-up from Geoffrey Porges of Leerink Partners. Your line is now open. Mr. Porges, your line is now open. If your phone is on mute, please take it off mute. Thank you. And it appears I’m showing no further questions on the phone. I’d now like to turn the conference back to Mr. Winningham. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you very much operator. And I’d like to thank everyone for joining us today. We're extremely excited about where we are as a Company and the opportunities that lie ahead for us and the opportunity to make a significant difference in with -- to patients in a number of different diseases and also to make a difference for our shareholders. So have a great day. Thanks again for participating.

This concludes today’s conference call. We thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect. Everyone have a great day.