Sure. So for the first question, in the leisure segment, we have -- to be honest, we have seen no signs -- so far, we have seen no signs of consumption downward. And the average travel spending on our platform continues to exceed the 2019’s level, both for new and existing users on a like-for-like basis. In the business segment, corporate travelers have also been spending more than what they did back in 2019. Looking at the long run, we are still confident in China’s travel demand because on the supplier side, the ongoing expansion of air, rail and highway networks, along with investments in other travel infrastructures in China, lay a strong foundation for the travel industry’s prosperity. While on the demand side, we see leisure travel spending evolving from cyclical to more secular, driven by increasing disposable income and a consumption shift from goods to services and experiences. In addition, OTA stands to gaining from increased online penetration. Although the business travel is typically more close tied to the economic activities and maybe impact by economic concerns, but we also see significant opportunities for us as more businesses will adopt managed corporate travel services to optimize their travel budget. For the second question, the sales and marketing expenses, our marketing efficiencies have seen significant improvement this year, primarily due to enhanced conversion and cross-selling efforts. Additionally, we made significant savings due to the strong release of pent-up demand. We do expect an increase in marketing spending as a percentage of revenue in the Q4 following a typical low seasonality in the next -- in the fourth quarter, and also as part of our efforts to normalize the marketing spending to stimulate future growth. And in the long run, we are quite consistently to have -- to commit it to an ROI-driven marketing investment approach, striving to balance the efficiency gains and the long-term investment needs in the overseas markets as well as the opportunities in the lower-tier cities in China. And with regard to the competition with the content platform, I think, so far, what we observed, the competitive landscape in China domestic market is generally steady with some seasonal fluctuations in the marketing intensities among players. And I think OTA and content platform have totally different core competence. Content platform excel at producing creative content and sharing information, make them effective at promoting trending products. However, most of the content platform, they lack very strong back-end system to fulfill the booking capabilities, while OTA’s core competence in the -- firstly, in the supplier chain -- standard supplier chain and also, more importantly, the capabilities to provide reliable services. Therefore, of course, we will always be sensitive in terms of the competition in the market. But at the end of the day, what we need to always focus is to strengthen -- further strengthening our core competence. Thank you.