Afternoon and welcome to TD Bank Group's Second Quarter 2014 Investor Presentation. My name is Rudy Sankovic. I am the Head of Investor Relations at the Bank. We will begin today's presentation with remarks from Ed Clark, the Bank's CEO and Bharat Masrani, our COO; and after which Colleen Johnson, the Bank's CFO will present our second-quarter operating results. Mark Chauvin, our Chief Risk Officer will then offer comments on credit quality after which we will entertain questions from those present in the room and prequalified analysts and investors on the phone. Also here today to answer your questions are Tim Hockey, Group Head - Canadian Banking, Auto Finance and Wealth Management; Mike Peterson, Group Head - U.S. Banking, Bob Dorrance, Group Head - Wholesale Banking; and Riaz Ahmed, Group Head - Insurance, Credit Cards and Enterprise Strategy. Riaz is also responsible for the capital and treasury activities of the bank. Please turn to Slide 2. At this time, I would like to caution our listeners that the presentation contains forward-looking statements. There are risks that actual results could differ materially from what is discussed in that certain material factors or assumptions were applied in making these forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements contained in this presentation represent the views of management and are presented for the purpose of assisting the banks' shareholders and analysts in understanding the bank's financial position. Objectives and priorities and anticipated financial performance forward-looking statements may not be appropriate for other purposes. [I probably should put my glasses on.] The bank uses non-GAAP financial measures to arrive at adjusted results to assess each of its businesses and to measure overall bank performance. The bank believes that adjusted results provide readers with a better understanding of how management views the bank's performance. Ed and Bharat will be referring to adjusted results in their remarks. Additional information on items of note, the bank's reported results and factors and assumptions related to forward-looking information are all available on our Q2 2014 report to shareholders. With that, let me turn the presentation over to Ed.

Thank you, Rudy. You can see I do have my glasses on. Good morning. Good afternoon everyone and welcome. Bharat and Colleen as mentioned, are going to talk about our second-quarter results, but let me give you my thoughts about our performance and how the year looks going forward a bit. The second-quarter really had a very strong quarter for TD. In fact, an outstanding quarter, earnings were up 14% year-over-year and earnings per share were up 15% to $1.9. This impressive performance was driven by strong results in all our business segments. Earnings were up 10% for the first half of the year and EPS was up 11%. Again, a very good result and one that does put us on track to deliver full-year adjusted EPS growth inside our medium-term 7% to 10% target range, after adding back insurance losses we announced in the third quarter 2013. Now, this is a better outcome than we were expecting when we started the year and it reflects positive developments on a number of fronts. Our core businesses continue to deliver good organic growth. Our acquisitions are also performing well. With the latest addition to the roster, the Aeroplan portfolio operating ahead of expectations with respect to new account quote. We also benefited from broad-based improvement in credit quality in the quarter. Credit has continued to be strong and more favorable than we expected across our retail and commercial portfolios and on both sides of the border. We said before, this trend cannot continue indefinitely, but it may have a while to go. Finally, we've had support from a stronger U.S. dollar which increased the contribution of our U.S. retail earnings at the total Bank level . It all added up to a very strong first half and we are feeling good…

Thank you, Ed, and good afternoon everyone. As Ed said, the second quarter was an outstanding one for TD, and we are pleased with where we stand at the midpoint of the fiscal year. We are generating good organic growth in a core businesses, our acquisitions are performing well and you we have reaped the benefits of a continued improvement in credit. Let me review how this is playing out in each of our key businesses. Our Canadian Retail segment had a great quarter. Net income was up 12%, driven by strong results in a core banking, wealth management and credit card businesses, as well as continued improvement in credit. Personal and commercial banking turned in another strong performance supported by solid personal loan and deposit volumes and double-digit growth in business lending. Our wealth business benefited from good asset and fee income growth and increased trading activity. The first full quarter of Aeroplan, followed strong growth in the cards business as well as an uptick in net interest margin, we were pleased that the insurance business showed more stability this quarter while absorbing the effects of the severe winter. We had excellent results on the expense front, recording positive operating leverage. Looking ahead, the outlook for the Canadian Retail segment remains good. Personal lending has moderated, but is still expanding at a reasonable pace and we had strong momentum in growth businesses. For the first half of the year, earnings were up 9%, and with Aeroplan in the mix for the second half, Canadian retail is well-positioned to contribute to the bank 7% to 10% adjustment EPS growths target this year. Our U.S. Retail segment had a strong quarter with U.S. dollar net income up 15% from a year ago, including TD Ameritrade. Excluding TD Ameritrade, earnings were up…

Well, thank you, Bharat. Good afternoon, everyone. Let me take you through our results. For Q2, we delivered adjusted EPS of the $1.09, up 15% year-over-year. This was a record quarter despite fewer days. Total bank adjusted net income of $2.1 billion was up 14%. Our segment results include retail adjusted earnings of $1.9 billion, a new record, up 16% over last year including the impact of a stronger U.S. dollar. Wholesale net income of $207 million was down 6% from a strong quarter last year and the Corporate segment posted a loss of $30 million. Overall, a very strong result for the bank this quarter. Please turn to Slide 5. This next slide presents our reported and adjusted earnings this quarter with the difference due to two items of note. Both of these items will be familiar to you. You should expect to see items of note related to Aeroplan in the second half of the year since our conversion is expected to take place in June. Please turn to Slide 6. Canadian Retail delivered a strong quarter with record adjusted net income of $1.3 billion, up 12% year-over-year. The increase was driven by solid loan and deposit volume growth, higher fee income primarily in the wealth business and the addition of Aeroplan. Loan and deposit growth was solid this quarter. Total loan growth was 6% year-over-year, with real estate secured lending up 4% and business lending growth up a strong 12%. Card growth was strong at 25%, due mainly to the addition of Aeroplan. Personal and business deposits increased by 4% due to strong growth in core checking and savings accounts, partially offset by lower term deposit volume. NIM increased three basis points sequentially, primarily due to the Aeroplan card acquisition. We expect margins to be relatively stable…

Thank you, Colleen. Good afternoon, everyone. Please turn to Slide 12. Consistent with my comments last quarter, credit performance across the bank remained strong as we continue to see broad-based improvement across all credit portfolios. Notable highlights during the quarter include, annual loss rates in Canadian real estate secured lending and business banking continued to run at very low levels. Credit quality remains very good. While it's early, the Aeroplan portfolio is performing as expected. The U.S. picture continues to improve in both, the Retail and Commercial segments with no immediate signs of concern ahead. The net result of a general improvement in credit metrics during the quarter was a five-basis point reduction in the bank's overall PCL loss rate to 35 basis points. While further improvement in credit quality is not anticipated, loss rate should remain stable over the balance of the year and into fiscal 2015 based on current economic forecasts. With that, I will turn it back to Rudy.

Thank you, Mark. We will now open it up for questions. To give everyone a chance to participate, please keep to one question and then re-queue if there is time. For those participating in person, can I ask you identify your name and firm before asking your question? Before ending the call today, I will ask Ed to offer some final remarks. Why don't we get started in the room with any questions? Rob.

Hi. It's Rob Sedran from CIBC. Mike, I have got a question for you on loan growth in the U.S. For the last few quarters, I guess, the personal lending in particular has kind of gone sideways, seen a little bit of progress in C&I, but the personal side has gone sideways, for a period of fairly strong relative performance. Are you settling into a level where the industry trends are starting to affect TD, and you are basically going to grow with the sector or do you think there is a period of performance still to come?

That's not my expectation, Rob, so overall we have had continued strong growth year-over-year in deposits and loans. As you allude to, in the second quarter, we did see some slowing of that particularly on the personal side. I think there's some seasonality there in the cards portfolio for example. I also think there is a winter effect, particularly given the footprint we have. That's certain what I hear when I'm out in the field. If you look at that personal line, so Auto Finance and Target were actually down and our mortgages grew very modestly, so it is to take each of those in turn. On Auto, I think, you all know that we've been evolving our strategy a little bit and are being sharper in terms of the business and the dealers that we are targeting. That should stabilize going forward and there maybe some upside for growth again. On Target, we had the volumes there on cards rather the volume slowed down due to the Target breach. There was obviously lower spend. There was a slowdown in card sales and there was card reissuance and so on, so you know that that definitely had an impact in the quarter. We've already seen that start to come back in terms of sales and card sales going into the third quarter. Then on mortgages, as I said this, I think partly due to weather and particularly given our footprint, but the overall mortgage market is clearly challenged in the U.S. as you've seen some signs that that's frightening right now in terms of application volumes through the industry and so on. I think as you look at the overall lending outlook and in TDs case, some of this Q2 slowdown on the personal side was due to what you might think of as non-recurring factors whether that's the weather or the seasonality or Auto and Target portfolios and I'm hoping that our loan growth will be a bit better in the next few quarters. As I said, we are already starting to see Target sales improving. We saw some HELOC improvement in the late part of the quarter, maybe linked to this lock-in phenomenon that you hear about where people don't want to move because they are locked into really low rates, but they are renovating and improving their current houses and so on. Commercial lending as you allude to is still fairly strong both, year-over-year and through the quarter, so if the mortgage market improves, I think we will get more than our fair share going forward as we have in the past. In general, I think, we are well-positioned to continue to outperform.

John Aiken, Barclays. Mike, just because I am sitting beside Rob, I am going to tag on to his question. Good commentary about the mortgage market and of course we have been hearing that commentary from your U.S. peers, but are you starting to see any improvement in the levels of activity in the mortgage market or is this winter season carrying on through and it's still early to tell? Secondarily, if we are in environment where revenue growth remains challenged for the U.S. side of the business and is commentary still willing to invest in the U.S. Retail platform. How long are you willing to invest in the platform with flat to negative operating leverage carrying on.

Well, on the mortgage portfolio I don't want to give you information that's not sort of solidly empirically rooted. I can tell you that anecdotally you are starting to hear about a bit of an uptick. I do think there's some pent up demand, the Federal Housing Association did change some of their rules around put-backs and so on, so I think there's a scenario here where things get better and I do hear a little bit of that, but nothing I can kind of statistically hang my hat on. If there was a winter back up, we should see some of that in the late spring months and into the early summer. In terms of investing in the business, if you step back from the current difficulties that the industry is facing in the U.S. I kind of think about the fact that we are still, you know, in terms of the macro trends outgrowing the competition in terms of acquiring customers in the deposit side and checking accounts, in the lending side and that we have a wonderful footprint with good competitive advantage relative to our service, so you can't react to a momentary tough situations. I think, we are very well-positioned in the U.S. and we will continue to invest, because we think that there's lots of medium to long-term upside growth in this business.

Okay. Thanks Mike.

Thanks, John. Anyone else in the room? Okay. Operator, why don't we go to the phones please?

Yes. Sir. We have a question from the line of Steve Theriault with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please go ahead.

Thanks very much. Question for Mark, please, on the U.S. credit side, the $155 million this quarter, certainly well below recent run rates. Can you talk a bit about the sustainability of losses at these levels where you expect second half of the year? I think in your general commentary, you suggested overall loss rates should remain relatively stable, but I'd be interested in your view on the U.S. specifically, and if you could give us a little more detail on what drove the sharp improvement this quarter in the U.S. specifically that would be very helpful.

Yes. Certainly. In the U.S., what you are seeing after a period of several years of relatively high loan losses, we are in the period, especially in the commercial bank, where we are seeing charge-offs lower than our expectation and recoveries actually higher, so commercial by nature will be somewhat lumpy, but it's going to be probably lumpy on the positive side as we go into this period. The actual commercial loan losses in the quarter were quite small. If I go to the Personal segments, Credit Cards and the TD Auto Finance, both of those are holding very stable in terms of loss rates. In fact TD Auto Finance is actually reducing a bit going forward as we kind of reposition the strategy focusing on more super-prime, so I'm looking for those to be relatively stable and continuing at same or slightly lower levels going forward. Then the other Personal segments, we entered the year in the U.S. somewhat worried about the of the end of term issue in HELOC, but that is proving to be not as much of an issue as we thought, so the loan losses are slightly lower than our expectations and I think that will continue. It's hard to predict an absolute run rate, but I would look for probably continued improvement, but I wouldn't look for significant reductions in the absolute number, but less than you would have seen in the previous quarters.

Okay. Thanks for that.

Thanks, Steve. Next question please operator?

Our next is from the line of Meny Grauman with Cormark Securities. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good afternoon. One, focusing on trading, you made comments about how we can expect trading revenue to move to a lower run rate from what we have seen lately and I am just wondering what are the factors that have driven it up over this past quarter and the previous quarter was also very strong. What are the factors that are going away that makes you be a little more cautious on that trading line?

It's Bob Dorrance. I all answer that. I think, what Colleen said is that, our normalized guidance on trading revenues has tended to be in the $300 million per quarter range. In the first half, that's been exceeded. I don't think she was making a forecast necessarily that it was going to be reduced in the second half and indeed it's very hard number to forecast, so. I don't know why we give that guidance in the first place, but anyway. We gave it I think, because people wanted to get a sense of what one might earn in a normalized year and that's what it's meant to be. The trading in the first of two quarters, the trading related revenue has been strong and it's been driven significantly by the origination markets, so the issuance markets in fixed income investment grade bonds, non-investment grade bonds, equity et cetera, had picked up significantly in Canada as we got into the latter part of the last calendar year in the first five months of this year. With strong origination, the post-market trading that has resulted from that is what's causing the outperformance in our case. If you look at the actual marketplace liquidity, on a secondary basis, in most markets it's relatively weak, but the advents of a strong origination markets leading to better trading is the reason for the outperformance and that may well sustain itself in the second half, so I wouldn't read anything into the $300 million guidance other than that what is norm. On a normalized basis, and if you look at last year two of the four quarters were slightly under $300 million.

Thank you.

Thanks, Meny. Next question please?

The next question is from the line of Sumit Malhotra with Scotia Capital. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon. A couple of questions regarding the Corporate segment please. It's probably for Colleen. Page 10 of the supplement, we see that on the all bank level, net interest margin was up about nine basis points, sequentially, and it looks like there was $100 million swing in the Corporate segment NII. I know this isn't the easiest segment to talk about, but there was some commentary about tax related item and some I think it was hedging and treasury activities. Could you put a little bit more color on that, because $100 million swing obviously had a big impact on the aggregate net interest income number?

Sure. As you cited, we had a tax related item in the Corporate segment this quarter, on a net basis, it was a very small addition to the - core positive addition to the Corporate segment, but there were two lines that were significantly impacted. One was on the NII line, so there was a, again, tax related item there. Related to the same settlement, we had a larger tax expense, so what you would see in fact is that all bank level, our margin increased by nine basis points. That was pretty much due entirely to this item and then you would also see that our adjusted effective tax rate for the quarter was about 19.5% and that was about two point higher than it would have been otherwise. Again, on a net a small basis, this was a small number, but it did distort those couple of lines.

For NII specifically is it reasonable to believe that in this segment, which usually runs at a negative, we are likely to be back there in the foreseeable future?

Yes. I think that's a pretty reasonable assumption. Again, it's hard to predict. It will vary, but it should look more like prior quarter levels.

Secondly for this segment, the gains on sale, the bank has been booking as a result of the Ameritrade sales. Now, correctly if I am wrong, but I think part of the reason that these sales are being undertaken was to give Ameritrade some more room on their buyback activity. I think, they have been a little bit more quiet on that, your ownership stake is now about as you mentioned to around 40%, so are we at the end of the selling Ameritrade shares in the market or is that going to continue in the near-term?

It's Ed here. I think, we are at the ownership position that we thought was appropriate and I don't expect us to sell any more shares.

I am sorry, Colleen. Where was this being booked on a fee income basis? Was it in the other line that?

It's in the famous other, other category in revenues.

Thank you very much for your time.

Thanks, Sumit. Next question please? Our next question is from the line of Peter Routledge with National Bank Financial. Please go ahead.

Hi. I have a question on Ameritrade too. Just a clarification, the deduction at Ameritrade makes on your CET1, is that about $2.6 billion, Colleen?

Net of the basket, that's about right.

Yes, so I think about Ameritrade, and I think while there is $2.6 billion in the deduction and then it looks like you have got a pretty substantial gain after taxes, call it, 1.7, so there is somewhere north of $4 billion in capital effectively in your Ameritrade investment. Delighted I am sure you are with the performance, I just wonder if $80 million quarterly in earnings is a little low in light of the amount of capital that's locked up. Have you ever thought of or are you now thinking of your Ameritrade investment in that light?

It's Ed again. I think the simple answer is no, but I don't know whether it was you or Riaz, I think can leap in and explain the capital base for you.

Yes. Peter, the deduction of the capital is the capital investment, so the basket helps take care of the part of the book value, so as you know we carry that $5.1 billion. The way the basket works is some portion of that book value is in the deduction and the rest is risk-weighted, so I think the way you are thinking of the capital number is, it's too high.

Yes. I mean, it just seems like there would be an opportunity to liberate more capital and you wouldn't give up that much in earnings.

Yes. I think what I would lob in is that we have the earnings. You see the equity earnings in and call that the $80 million a quarter or so, but we also do have earnings in the U.S. Retail segments related to sweep deposit, which obviously you don't see that number separately, but that does add to the return on capital on that particular investment, so we are I think fair enough to say we are satisfied with the overall return if that's your question, Peter.

Yes. That was. Thanks.

Thank you, Peter. Next question please?

Next question is from the line of Gabriel Dechaine with Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good afternoon. Just a quick one, I think, Colleen, you mentioned there were some accretable yield in the U.S. I didn't come across that in the note. Could you quantify that please?

Yes. On a net basis, we had the impact of accretion was a positive four basis points in the quarter. That was more than offset though by a mix issue and normally people glaze over when you talk about mix, but in this particular case, because of the decline in the target balances on quarter-over-quarter basis as we have called out related in large part to the security breach that actually had a six-basis point impact, so a negative. On a net basis, the two of those - that was a net minus-2 in the quarter of the minus-6. The remainder being more loan margin-driven.

Okay, and minus-6-type target is just a balance of it going down sequentially?

The mix impact of the lower balances in target.

Okay. Then speaking of cards anyway, Aeroplan your initial guidance was for 2014, the earnings contribution on a core basis, I guess, to be about $90 million. I get the sense that you are running ahead of that now. I have tried to back into it, but the limited exposure, it's difficult, but I get to somewhere $100 million. Is it materially higher than the $90 million, or fractionally higher, or incrementally higher than $90 million?

Gabriel, we are doing somewhat better than the $90 million, but I think it's early days to think of giving you any different in terms of guidance as you know we have had a fantastic start in our distribution system on new card additions and the portfolio that we acquired is also doing somewhat better than expected, but it is early days as new card portfolio matures and then have a conversion ahead of us, so I think we are happy with the guidance that we have given.

Speaking on the conversion, I am just trying to figure out the moving pieces here. That when those customers get a new card in the mail. That's a TD or Aeroplan on it and is it there is a cost associated with all that, maybe some help the transition them. We noticed that pick up in expenses and do you expect any losses along the way from lower retention I guess at that point?

Look, this is a large conversion. It's 550,000 accounts. On June 16th, the TDRO plan card will be available for use by those cardholders and then their existing card will not be, so I think that journey ahead in terms of communicating with our newly acquired customers is already underway and the card distribution is also already underway and yes there will be some additional cost as Colleen pointed out in the third quarter, so you can expect to see some upticks and some items of note related to the conversion as well.

Items of note, they will be excluded from card then?

Some expenses, I mean, it will be done in accordance with our accounting policy. Some will be items of note and some will be in the ordinary course.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you, Gabriel. Next question please?

Our next question is from the line of Sohrab Movahedi with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Sohrab Movahedi – BMO Capital Markets: Just wanted to go back to the U.S. segment quickly and see if there are any pending costs there as you gear up for the U.S. stress tests stuff. The fed stress test, are you systems compliant or will there be incremental costs that we are not seeing right now as you go through that process a year or so from now?

As you know, we participated already in the DFAST process and you would have seen the results, which were good and they showed the resiliency of our model and our balance sheet. We don't have to file or participate in CCAR until early 2016, so we are gearing up all of that process, have been for a while. That's a gradual thing. I don't expect that you will see anything significant over that time period, but obviously there will be additional costs and capabilities created as we get there, but a lot of that spend and capability has already have been built to be where we are today. Sohrab Movahedi – BMO Capital Markets: Nothing noticeable to us, Mike, as far as the expenses?

I don't think so. Sohrab Movahedi – BMO Capital Markets: Thank you.

Thanks Sohrab. Next question please?

Our next question is from the line of Mario Mendonca with TD Securities. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon. Colleen, can you take me through the NII discussion in Corporate. Rudy, did a good job of explaining it to me before the call, but I think I got a little confused. You referred to the lift in the margin, the all bank margin of nine basis points as being entirely related to that interest refund. Nine basis points would imply a number approaching somewhat like a $150 million $170 million refund, but that seems awfully high. Could you help me think that through?

No. That is too high. The number is about half that amount.

The nine basis points that - I could certainly take this offline, but the nine basis points would amount to a number higher than half that?

It shouldn't. I would be happy to go through the math with you.

Thank you very much.

Thank you, Mario. Next question please? Our next question is from the line of Darko Mihelic with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Just thought I would lob this question in, because as I look at this result and judging from the body language although not in the room just from the sense of getting on the phone is that you are particularly delighted with the quarter. It looks like some strength will continue into the back half of the year, so as I look at the dividend versus the quarter, 42%, should get some strength into the back half of the year. What about a dividend increase? Maybe you can just revisit the changed dividend sort of messaging from last quarter and does it preclude perhaps the dividend increase in the next quarter or two or just perhaps outline for us, Ed, your thinking on what you would recommend to the board in the back half of the year given the strength so far this year?

I would probably recommend to the board that my successor make that decision, so I wouldn't expect on my watch to see another dividend increase.

Okay. Thank you very much.

Thanks, Darko. Next question please?

Our next question is a follow-up from the line of Sumit Malhotra. Please go ahead.

Just wanted to check on something here, in terms of risk-weighted assets flat quarter-over-quarter, it look like securities were lower and that seemed to help market RWA, but was surprised to see, if I am not mistaken credit RWA was down sequentially as well. Was there anything that I missed in terms of model refinements or approvals that you received that had a positive impact on the RWA trend sequentially?

Foreign exchange was partly a factor, but yes there was a model approval that we did receive. Maybe I will just ask Mark to elaborate on that.

Yes. We brought our wealth margin loans under ARB, so it did result in the slight reduction in capital - allowed us to open standardized RWA was a seven-basis point impact on CET1.

I know these things tend to be quite active. Is there anything else that you expect as a near-term meaningful impact in terms of model/process reviews in terms of RWA or is it basically the business trends that are driving it right now?

Yes. I wouldn't see any modeled, I mean, you have ongoing of parameter updates that can have some impact, but generally speaking as you get deeper into the process, they tend to not beat result in increase, so it's kind of refinements, so generally it's a reduction, but I wouldn't see other model impacts that would have a positive impact over the near-term.

Last one from me. This is probably for Ed. I think you had about 9.25 on the CET1 now. The bank was quite active on its share repurchase program in 2013, and have now been - I think you have paused on that since September. Is there a level that you need to see before you are comfortable and reactivating that program? What will that level be and are you there right now?

I think the answer is, we are there. There is a $200 million left in that program and I think we would expect to complete the program. As we said, when we started it that we will do what we said we do.

Thanks.

Thanks, Sumit. Next question please?

Our next question is a follow-up from the line of Gabriel Dechaine. Please go ahead.

Just going back to market actually and talking about the credit, do you think like you are indicating there is a kind of cyclicality to the recovery cycle? If I look at page 30 of your supplement that recovery's line has been moving steadily upwards. I know it's probably difficult for you to forecast that, but is that plateauing. Is it going to trend higher? What's the outlook there?

I kind of have to divided North and South. Canada has been a relatively stable portfolio for a fair period of time. Especially in the retails side, I would look for quality say the same, but not big fluctuations unless there is a change in the economy of course, but my comments were more focused towards the U.S., where you’ve had a period of dealing with problem [long] resolution for an extended period of time and there is a longer for resolution of whether it's a mortgage or whether it's commercial loans. As you exit that period, what you do find is you get a series of recoveries. Generally speaking, you tend to reserve to a level that is appropriate and sometimes you are surprised on the upside, so that's what we saw in the last quarter and I'd expect to see in a few quarters to come, largely driven in the commercial bank, not so much - not at all in the larger unsecure portfolios, the card portfolio or TDRO finance, but in that one but it can be lumpy but it's going to, I think, surprise on the positive side.

Is there like a size of portfolio that you can point to, like that were problem loans that you are working hard at resolving?

No. It's just a commercial. I mean, you have seen dramatic reduction and loss rates in the commercial bank over the last --in the Commercial segment, the U.S. portfolio over the last five years and you are just seeing - and those loans can be $5 million or $10 million. They tend to be lumpy. If you look at the South acquisition, I mean, at the end of the day those played out, there were recoveries on them and we had the benefit of those in last couple of quarters, but they are running out and I would see a bit more coming in that direction and what we are not seeing is new problem, so we are not seeing things replacing at a higher charge-off levels.

Okay. Thank you.

Thanks, Gabriel. Why don't we move to Ed for final comments?

Great. Thank you. I think, as I said at the start, I think by any definition, this was an outstanding quarter. I think it underscores that our conservative franchise-driven model does have enormous resilience in it. On the other hand, we would caution that I wouldn't drive any change of the fundamental operating environment, which we are faced which remains I think a tough difficult environment, but in response to that environment I think we are going to just keep doing what we did which is invest in the franchise, because that's worth the way to get shareholder value over the long run. Thank you.

Thanks, Ed, and with that we will conclude the meeting and thank everyone for joining us. Thank you. We will see you next quarter.