Good morning. Welcome to Tenet Healthcare's Fourth Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. After the speaker remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session for industry analysts. . Tenet respectfully asks that analysts limit themselves to one question each. I'll now turn the call over to your host, Mr. Dan Cancelmi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Tenet. Mr. Cancelmi, you may begin.

Thank you, Operator. Good morning. We're pleased to have everyone join us this morning. Tenet's senior management with me on today's call include Ron Rittenmeyer, our Executive Chairman; and Dr. Saum Sutaria, our Chief Executive Officer. Our webcast this morning includes a slide presentation, which has been posted to the Investor Relations section of our website tenethealth.com. Listeners to this call are advised that certain statements made during our discussion today are forward-looking and represent Tenet management's expectations based on currently available information. Actual results and plans could differ materially. Tenet is under no obligation to update any forward-looking statements based on subsequent information. Investors should take note of the cautionary statement slide included in today's presentation, as well as the Risk Factors discussed in our most recent Form 10-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. With that, I'll turn the call over to Ron.

Good morning. Thank you, Dan. And thank all of you for joining us today regarding our fourth quarter earnings, and also all of 2021. Before I turn this over to Saum and Dan, briefly I would like to touch on a few aspects of 2021 and highlight what we believe are fundamental and sustainable changes we've made over the last several years that will continue to carry us forward. As I stated in my comments in the earnings release, the fourth quarter delivered strong, consistent results with adjusted EBITDA of approximately $1 billion for the quarter and very strong cash flows, both ending 2021 above guidance. We closed the significant SCD transaction on another 86 centers, established an exclusive development relationship with their team for the next five years, and acquired their ASC service group to further muscle build the USPI organization. Additionally, our internal development team also added more than 20 centers. This further solidifies USPI as the market leader and we are projecting approximately 50% of our earnings to come from this sector of the business by the end of 2023. Hospital performance except for Massachusetts due to the strike which is now settled performed above expectations across the board, while dealing with a continued COVID surge. And Conifer continues a positive delivery of consistent results, while expanding its offerings and gaining additional point solution opportunities in the marketplace. When you reflect on the overall Tenet business, it clearly has made a paradigm shift from the end of 2017. The fundamentals built on an analytical data-based approach, coupled with detailed and disciplined expense management in every aspect of our business, have proven our ability to handle volatility effectively. Every hospital group has now achieved positive contributions consistently. USPI should, as we said, continue to represent a larger more in fact, impactful portion of our earnings, and Conifer has improved its margins by over 1,000 basis points in the last four years. Coupled with consistent strong core growth, detailed and objective portfolio management as represented by the number of divestitures in ambulatory acquisitions we've successfully accomplished, supported by a stronger and well-designed balance sheet, the Tenet Enterprise is now positioned to be an organization with multiple consistent sources of revenue, free cash flow, EBITDA growth quarter-after-quarter, looking forward and then year-after-year. Having said this, I just have to comment, it is somewhat difficult to understand why Tenet remains classified mostly as a hospital company. The recognition of USPI's growing contribution, and Conifer's cash flow generation, for some reasons seem lost in the broader question of Tenet being recognized as more than a hospital company, with corresponding dialogues and/or multiples remaining caught in this time lapse. It appears that the transition of what Tenet has become and the de-leveraging we've accomplished are not fully recognized in the valuation of the company. We believe it's a point of view worthy of consideration. So with those comments now, I would like to turn it over to Saum.

Hi, thank you, Ron, and good morning, everybody. I'd like to start off with a personal thank you to our physicians, nurses and staff, their resolve to deliver high quality care through the recent surge of Omicron has been nothing short of excellent. Turning to our release, as you saw in the report posted yesterday, we ended the year with strong results. In Q4, we delivered adjusted EBITDA of more than $1 billion and $877 million excluding Cares Act funds. This is higher than the midpoint of our outlook and higher than consensus. We also drove a strong companywide EBITDA margin of 18.1% in the quarter. We continue to manage effectively through COVID. In Q4, COVID admissions were approximately 7% of the total. While the highly transmissible nature of Omicron had a greater impact on staffing, our operators continue to effectively balance resources and maintain strong COVID safety protocols. In addition, we remain focused on quality and safety across the portfolio. Serious safety events and hospital acquired infections declined in the fourth quarter despite the COVID surge. Average length of stay in our emergency departments was reduced given our focus on better patient service and easier access. And finally, USPI's surgical hospitals had zero hospital acquired infections in the fourth quarter. Our accomplishments in the quarter and the year reflect a commitment to executing our strategy and a continued positive trajectory for Tenet. At USPI, we acquired interest in or opened approximately 160 facilities since December of 2020. This included the SCD acquisitions, the acquisition of Compass, buy-ups in multiple surgical hospitals in addition to tuck-in acquisitions and de-novos. I want to reiterate a few points about the SCD acquisitions. We anticipate the portfolio of 135 centers from the two SCD transactions will have approximately $540 million in EBITDA and…

Thanks, Saum and good morning, everyone. To echo Ron and Saum's comments, I'm very pleased with how we finished the year with fourth quarter adjusted EBITDA coming in well above our expectations. Our outperformance was particularly notable given the many challenges we faced, including the spike in COVID cases due to the Omicron variant and the continuing inflationary wage and labor availability pressures providers across the industry are facing. For the fourth quarter, we generated consolidated adjusted EBITDA of $1.017 billion, which was $183 million or 22% better than the midpoint of our Q4 guidance. Even excluding the $140 million of grant income we earned in the quarter, our consolidated adjusted EBITDA was $877 million or $43 million higher than the midpoint of our guidance. For the full-year of 2021, we produced consolidated adjusted EBITDA of $3.483 billion, and a 11% increase over 2020, and a beat of $183 million compared to the midpoint of our most recent guidance. As a reminder, we raised our guidance three times during 2021 based on our outperformance each quarter, and we outperformed again in Q4. Our strong results for the year were driven by high patient acuity, a favorable payer mix as well as very effective cost control. In fact, our consolidated SW&B costs in Q4 as a percentage of revenue was lower than Q4 2020, about 45% in Q4 2021 compared to 45.3% in Q4 2020. Also our consolidated EBITDA margin for 2021 was 17.9%, an improvement of 510 basis points compared to our 2017 margin of 12.8%. I'd also like to highlight a few key items for each segment beginning with USPI. USPI delivered a solid 3.2% increase in surgical revenue per case in the quarter and surgical cases were 4.4% higher than Q4 2020. Q4 cases were 100% of pre-pandemic…

Thank you. At this time, we'll be conducting a question-and-answer session. . Our first question comes from Kevin Fischbeck with Bank of America. Please proceed with your question.

Okay, great. Thanks. I wanted to go to a comment I guess that Saum made about the outlook for labor. Saum, I think you talked about labor returning back towards normal, but not being normal as COVID recedes. Can you talk a little about where you expect, I guess what you're seeing right now as far as labor growth or wage growth and kind of where you expect that to shape up and stabilize? How should we think about that heading into 2022 and 2023?

Yes. Thanks for the question. I think that we're still in the throes of this current COVID surge. And so labor rates are higher than you -- otherwise like them to be, in particular, for contract labor. And then the shortages of staff that Omicron is created, because the staff have been affected by Omicron just exacerbates. And that's a pretty -- I mean, that's unique relative to what we saw with Delta or other COVID waves. And so I think the -- what we anticipate is that by the end of the first quarter, assuming that there are no more COVID surges that come up, with new therapies available, and other things that affect hospitals. So substantially, we ought to see the labor market start to normalize a bit. And it's a combination of both the rates and the stability of the staff that we're really looking for. I mean, during the surges, the rates become the biggest issue. As the surge goes away, and we refocus our energies on building the business back and managing to capture things that may have been deferred or delayed. Obviously, the availability of staff becomes the paramount issue at that point, and being able to get that staff in and retain them at that point. So that's kind of how it looks. I think it'll be the end of the first quarter before we have a real read on what the impact will be for the rest of the year.

The next question is from Pito Chickering with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed with your question.

Hey good morning, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. If you could give us a bit more color on the first quarter guidance what are you seeing at this point on surgeries rebounding back as COVID cases decline? As you look at your OR scheduling for February are we seeing a similar rebound, what we saw during the first quarter of 2021?

Hey, it's Saum. Again, I think it's a little bit early to say, the COVID surge is declining, I mean, the new incidence of cases, but it's still actually pretty high. I mean, relative to before this surge, we're still sitting at 4x the number of inpatients that we had. So I'm a little bit cautious about projecting forward. We still have states like Massachusetts that have elective surgery bands or effectively elective surgery bands. So we've -- some have suggested, we may be a little bit cautious in our Q1 guidance, but there's a lot going on right now, both from a regulatory perspective and an Omicron perspective. Now, that being said, we have put a premium on making sure that we are allocating staff into the service areas that we think are most important to remain open from an access standpoint. And as obviously in an acute care hospital organization that's focused on higher acuity service lines, we're putting a premium on allocating staff to operating room ICU and other places that that we think it would be important to maintain access. We feel very good about our outpatient surgery volumes in the hospitals, for example, at this stage of the game, and it's just a result of how we're allocating staff. Let me ask Brett to comment a little bit further on USPI.

Yes, thanks, Saum. No, on the USPI side of things very consistent with what Saum shared. Obviously, in January, we did see the impact of Omicron in terms of volume, in terms of staffing, but we are starting to see that subside a little bit going into February and starting to see the schedule folk up at the end of February and going into March.

Okay. And then a follow-up question on the margin side. Excluding sequestration, you're guiding hospital margins to be increasing year-over-year, despite a very strong comp from COVID in 2021. I guess, besides being able to deliver dynamic how should we think about margins as it relates to the favorable commercial mix you've had with a high acuity mix today, as you know, it's an expensive more into government and in the lower acuity settings? Thanks so much.

Hey, Peter it's Dan. Listen, we still obviously, very good about our margin improvement in our hospitals over the past several years, as I mentioned in my remarks, 200 basis points improvement about. And we're -- that's what we're continuing to focus on, driving improved margins. Obviously, this year the sequestration obviously does have an impact on year-over-year basis, but we would continue to focus on growing the higher acuity higher margin services, that's been an area of focus, and it's going to continue to be an area where we allocate capital and we think that's really beneficial. That's an addition to all the other cost management initiatives that we've been focused on over the past several years, whether it's in the supply chain side or in our other operating expense line where we've been going through renegotiating contracts, terminating contracts, if we don't get the right terms. There's more to do there. As we've talked about, we've been transitioning rules to our global business center in Manila. That's going well, and there's more to do there. And listen, we think we're well-positioned from a contracting perspective too whether its supply chain or with insurance plans.

Our next question comes from Sarah James with Barclays. Please proceed with your question.

Thank you. So just kind of following up on the questions in the moving pieces. You guys gave us a lot of detail around the bridge from 2021 to 2022 and there's different portions of it that are under your control, like what you guys are doing with supply expensing your strategy on labor. So I'm wondering if you can give us some insight on how you think about the seasonality first half versus second half compared to a normal year compared to last year. Just how you see some of the moving pieces that are under your control seasonal ?

Hey Sarah, it's Dan. I think I caught everything it was sort of hard to hear. But I think your question relates to, how we view seasonality this year, maybe versus other years. Certainly starting the year off, obviously, as we mentioned, we have seen an increase in COVID cases so far this year, even compared the end of December, and there was an elevated cases in December as well. So, that's we've taken that into consideration. I mean, there's some math be related to some items that we won't be able to recognize, in all likelihood in Q1 that I pointed out the Texas funding, but we're assuming that that comes back, and it gets approved, and we'll recognize that later in the year. So that will impact the timing of and the earnings as we move through the year depending on when it ultimately gets approved. But as COVID cases wane and assuming we don't have another big spike, we think, as we move through the year, there will be growing earnings second, third, fourth quarter. Now third quarter is typically, seasonally, somewhat softer than the other quarters. So, you need to take that into consideration, but also we've fully expect the fourth quarter to be very robust. That's typically the strongest quarter for our ambulatory business. And so that's the -- that's how we're viewing this year from a -- just sequential basis.

Great. And in your negotiations with the payers are you think any recognition of the current labor environment come into play as you think about price escalators and in future years?

We I don't think we want to get into specific negotiations with payers. The only thing I would say is there hasn't been any material changes in terms of negotiations.

Our next question comes from Justin Lake with Wolfe Research. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks. Good morning. I wanted to follow-up on a couple of the moving parts for 2022. Specifically, you gave us a lot of detail on sequestration. I'm curious about, the benefit you saw you had in 2021 from the extra COVID bump that 20% plus HRSA payments, and how you're thinking about those and what's built in for 2022 assumptions?

Hey, Justin, it's Dan. Let me take that one. For our assumptions, in our guidance this year, for COVID cases, let's start with that, assumes COVID cases for the full-year, we'll be roughly 5% or less, first quarter could be a little bit north of that, depending where how this ultimately lands. But so, we're assuming that there are level of COVID case. If not at the same level as 2021, when there was about 8%, or certainly not 2020. But, we are assuming, again, 5% or less of total admissions. In terms of the funding, and as I pointed out in my remarks, we are not assuming any grant income in our guidance. Any of the -- if there's additional funding, we'll have to evaluate whether we earn it. But right now, we're not assuming that. In terms of your other point about, the Medicare add-on. The one thing I would say is that, with that funding, comes a lot of incremental costs, not only for caring for those patients, there -- the expenses associated in the length of stay is typically longer, and the costs are higher. So, if those cases start to come down, then presumably, the expenses associated with those cases also come down. So, again, I think it's sort of a high-level, how we're viewing this year from that perspective.

Okay. And anything on HRSA dollars how much did you get in 2021? And what do you expecting for 2022?

Well, it's the same thing there. Those -- that reimbursement is for patients who have COVID. And that funding, as that funding dissipates, they also those, presumably, those cases also would no longer be there. There is a question as to, how long the funding will be there. Now, we've continued to receive funding, at least so far this year. And we'll see where that will ultimately lands this year. Again, it'll be depending on available funding, as well as the level of cases obviously.

Our next question comes from Josh Raskin with Nephron Research. Please proceed with your question.

Great, thanks. Good morning. Trying to figure out sort of long-term, sort of days for earnings and sort of within the 2022 guidance how you're thinking about the net impact of COVID, I've heard a couple of things. So I understand 5% of total volumes, et cetera. But I'm trying to weigh sort of those admissions and treatment against, the typical pause that you've seen in utilization and sort of what the totality of the impact of COVID is, on Tenet overall. And do you think that, that pause in utilization that you tend to see with surges will be less impactful in the future, as Tenet just continues to get better and better at managing through it?

Hey it's Saum. Let me attempt to address that, which is projecting, I mean I'm cautious because it projects forward and understanding of what types of variants may emerge, and that's where Omicron I think, surprised us a bit relative to Delta in terms of the nature of it's clinical course, right, it's been more of a broad infection not as severe, but based upon the number infected, it drove hospitalizations up again in a way that we might not have expected. So here's -- here a few things I would say. One is the therapies that have become available to treat COVID even on an outpatient basis, if those drugs are available from a supply chain standpoint that will probably reduce hospitalizations going forward. In my view, that's probably, among the primary things, other than the vaccinations, which have been by far the most impactful things in reducing COVID hospitalizations, and mortality. The new drugs are probably the second, most impactful things that will reduce the impact of COVID in the hospital environment. So at some point, I think we're going to return to a world where COVID hospitalizations become like other respiratory illnesses that we end up seeing that affect the hospitals probably to some extent, becoming seasonal as well, just like the flu from that standpoint. Dan's -- the point that Dan makes is really important. The way we have setup ourselves and just kind of the hospital industry to take care of COVID has involved adding a lot of costs to do that, right. It's significant isolation, expenses, et cetera, et cetera. The question becomes when this becomes, can you take care of COVID as a more regular respiratory virus infection that ends up in the hospital without all of those extra costs over time. And that'll probably help manage the ongoing impact of the COVID expenses on the hospitals. I mean, that's really where we have to get to. The other big point I would make is COVID dissipates. There is an unknown about when utilization in the sector will return to normal, like pre-COVID levels. Is it going to spring back immediately? Or is it going to take some time for those cases to come back? We obviously are making an assumption into 2022 that those other non-COVID cases will spring back partially as a result of utilization and demand and partially as a result of our strategies. And that's why we're tracking those non-COVID volumes carefully as I described.

Okay, I understand it's an impossible question, I guess, at this point. But just, it doesn't sound like COVID is necessarily a big impact one way or the other. It sounds like, yes, you see the increase in volumes and revenues. But there seems to be a lot of cost against that. Am I reading your comments right on that net-net COVID is not a big impact on the totality of $3.5 billion of EBITDA?

For 2022, it's not I mean, it's not it's -- the cases are declining. Dan's guided to less than 5% is what we're assuming. And a lot of what it will take to deliver on the $3.475 billion is our strategies in the hospital segment and the ASC segment delivering the kind of growth that we've described and then the ongoing efficiency initiatives that we have at Conifer.

Our next question is from A.J. Rice with Credit Suisse. And also -- thank you.

Hi, A.J.

Hello, Conifer sounds like that the bate case is probably no longer a spend sometime this year it sounds like it's an ongoing evaluation. I just wanted to see the clarify that a little more and what you're taking on maybe change in that direction slightly is. And then I'm sympathetic with Ron's comments at the very beginning, but you've created a lot of value seemingly in the USPI operation, the inventory business in the market has been slow to give you credit for it. I'm sure, private equity guys and other guys are noticeable about the opportunities commensurates your current valuation with that. And also even your leverage gains is your view on that, if you're just going to let time pass and as you prove out the SCD transaction upside and so forth, that hopefully the market recognize it or do you have any sense of urgency that maybe we need to look and figure out ways to unlock the value that we believe we've created more near-term?

Well, this is Ron. I'll talk about Conifer a bit separately. We think we've already unlocked value in terms of the performance and returns we've had. We're not out there looking for other vehicles or other ideas at this stage. I mean, the company is performing well. We think there's still more for us to do. And we'll keep doing it, or I think our focus is more on how do you have -- how do you keep evaluation backdated, when in fact, you've had consistent year-over-year and month-over-month, quarter-over-quarter performance that would suggest that or not suggest, but prove that what we said is true. And all we're -- the only comment I was really trying to make was, at some point, the thought process has got to leap forward. And especially when you have other surgery centers valued at unbelievable at these high numbers. And our numbers don't reflect any of that. It just makes no sense. So let me just stop there on that. On Conifer. Look we're not going to answer the question, what's the plan today. We spent a lot of time on this, and have spent a lot of time. I always go back to the same statement. 2018 at JPMorgan, we agreed to do this, because the army was at the door. And our performance did not support ignoring them. Today, going ahead, we haven't ignored the Conifer asset by any means. 1000 basis points, I can't imagine a lot of companies that wouldn't feel good about that, especially given the size of Conifer. But clearly COVID has slowed us down in terms of the accomplishments we wanted to make with Conifer. Partially because you can't be out in the marketplace selling at the same level we've really been working on the IT…

. Our next question comes from Jason Cassorla with Citi. Please proceed with your question.

Great, thanks. Good morning, guys. Most of my questions have been asked already. But maybe could you delve into trends around payer mix in the quarter and how sustainable those trends are going forward? And maybe what the puts and takes out of payer mix as we think about 2022. Just to that point, does 2022 guidance assume any consideration around the resumption of Medicaid determinations at this point? Thanks.

Hey, Jason, it's Dan. The payer mix in the quarter was pretty consistent with what we've saw pretty much throughout the entire year commercial trends more favorable than our overall aggregate trends. And some of that is makes sense given the concern of certain individuals to seek care and unless it's absolutely necessary. So, no major change in payer trends in the quarter compared to what we were seeing throughout the year and really the back half of 2020 as well. And then that sort of position, we took that into consideration when we were developing our guidance for this year, although, we do anticipate some of the lower acuity cases recovered stronger than they have so far. So that'll have some impact on the mix. But the trends in the quarter were not surprising and they were pretty much consistent with our expectations.

Our next question is from Brian Tanquilut with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, good morning, guys. I guess my question is for Brett. As I think about total joint performance across USPI, both in the legacy businesses and SCD assets. How should we think about the opportunity to embed the SCD skillset so to speak into USPI's ASCs we have heard one of the commercial payers flagged a 55% shift in joint replacements to outpatient. So just trying to figure out how you can harness that opportunity and expand it across portfolio and how you think, how much opportunity you see ? Thanks.

Hey Brian thanks for the question. This is Brett. And look I mean, we have continued to experience a significant growth in our total joint business I mean you think about for the year, and as Saum mentioned that we added 89 new service lines across the portfolio in 2021 and a significant number of those related to total joints. And just to put that into context with some numbers, total joints in Q4 showed significant improvement growing 146% over prior-year, and 130% year-over-year growth for 2021. And so, I think in any context, those are pretty significant growth rates. Obviously, SCD does a great job, has historically done a great job in expanding their total joint footprint. And of course, we're going to continue to learn from them and vice versa in terms of how we expand not only in total joints, expand across a wide variety of higher acuity specialties, including spine, including cardiac. So we'll continue to learn from one another as we integrate their business into ours. And obviously, with our five-year partnership with SCD, we will continue to work together as they build out their portfolio and partner together on a go-forward basis with essentially everything they do from a development perspective over the next five years.

Hey, Brian, let me just add one other point to that which is that just remember the strategy working with SCD in orthopedics was very deliberate, I mean USPI's core platform in orthopedics was already the leader in the Ambulatory Surgery space. So our ability with Brett and team to build and grow in the orthopedics, bone and joint pain and other related spaces is not limited to the portfolio of centers that we've recently partnered with an SCD, it's the whole portfolio. And that's why we think this aspiration that we had of being the unquestionable leader in outpatient orthopedic surgery, including innovating and adding new procedures in the USPI environment has been very important strategically, to where USPI is headed.

The next question is from Ben Hendrix with RBC Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, good morning. Thank you for taking my question. Just had a quick one to follow-up on Justin's earlier question. Is it possible for you to quantify kind of what you had received in 2021 in total from the COVID-related subsidies, 20% add-on the sequester relief and HRSA and then kind of what do you have baked into guidance, at least from a magnitude perspective and directionally for 2022? Thanks.

Hey, Ben, it's Dan. We haven't put a specific number out there for the Medicare add-on, or HRSA. I would here's the thing, the funding yes it has been very helpful, let's take HRSA for example very helpful for patients who otherwise would be uninsured. But it's Medicare reimbursement for patients that we're providing care for. And again, the cost profile for caring for those type of patients is higher than a typical admission. And so, yes, the funding is there, but also the costs are there. So it's not necessarily a matter of all the funding goes away, and then but the cases are still there. We certainly hope that's not the case. But we'll ultimately have to wait and see in terms of where the funding ultimately lands. So I would tell you that we get the question a lot. The HRSA funding is approximately for 2021 was approximately $75 million. But again, there's costs or you just, you can't assume that, okay, the revenue goes away and that's a massive headwind. We certainly hope that's not the case.

Our next question is from Whit Mayo with SVB Leerink. Please proceed with your question.

Okay. Two really quick ones. First, just a clarification on the SCD disclosures, what's the difference in the old guidance of $175 million and the $140 million that you're getting to now? I wasn't clear and then if you could give us an update on the Baylor put call, thanks.

Hey Whit, it's Daniel. In terms of the difference between the $175 million and the latest estimate of $140 million, keep in mind when we announced the deal, and in November, we were targeting 92 centers based on subsequent due diligence. We made a determination not to invest in six of those centers. So that's a fairly large portion of the difference. And then other thing, too, is based on, is we learned further information on timing of buy-ups that also was a factor and updating the estimate. More importantly, is the fact that our overall fully ramped, consolidated EBITDA estimate from the portfolio, which is six centers smaller than originally planned is 86 versus 92, we still feel very comfortable with our overall fully ramped estimate of $275 million, fully ramped. So even though six centers aren't there, we think long-term, years three to four, we will still achieve $275 million. In terms of your other question about the Baylor USPI call put, we'll obviously when we get to the point of finalizing that, we will disclose that. So there's nothing really to add at this point.

Our next question is from John Ransom with Raymond James. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, good morning. How many ASPs do you think you end up consolidating this year through buy-out versus unconsolidated at the start of the year?

John, just to clarify, are you asking vis-à-vis the latest SCD transaction?

Yes, how many centers you think to buy-out this year to get the majority position?

So John, we've accomplished well over -- well about 16 year-to-date. And we expect to do another 30 this year, 30 plus this year.

Does that gets to your end goal, are there more to do after the end of this year?

It gets us to our estimate, our expectations. I think over time, if you go past 2022, we'll end up consolidating more of the portfolio then that as you know there's a total of 86 facilities but quite a few of those facilities that are part of the 86 are yes less than a year old and some of them are still under development. So when you go into 2023, 2024 we will consolidate, we will end up consolidating more of the portfolio as those centers mature.

Our next question is from Andrew Mok with UBS. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, good morning. CapEx in the quarter accelerated meaningfully to $200 million. Can you help us understand where you allocated the growth CapEx in the quarter? And how do you view the runway to expand higher acuity service lines within your hospital portfolio?

Well, I mean, the runway to continue making the -- I mean, this is a longer-term strategy for us, right. And it was one that we haven't stopped. So, it obviously has multiple prongs capital, infrastructure expansion, but very thoughtful. Clinical technology is probably the heart of it. And getting the right complement of caregivers to be able to deliver essentially high acuity services in a community hospital based setting, that's really the foundation of what we're trying to do. And there's plenty of runway there. I mean, the cardiovascular neurosciences, surgical suite of procedures are all growing and developing. And it's also true at USPI, I mean we stay on top of the number of things that are being innovated in an ambulatory setting, and then we work to create the right environment for that to happen safely. So we think there's a lot of room to continue along with this technology and service evolution that's going on in the high acuity space. The other thing about high acuity is you have to be focused on medical cases, not just surgical cases as well. And obviously, that's more of a hospital based, hospital based priority.

Okay, operator, we're going to have to end it now. Thanks. Thank you so much everyone for joining us today.

This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and we thank you for your participation.