Good day ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Thermon Earnings Conference Cal. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will be given at that time. And as a reminder this conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the floor over to Sarah Alexander, General Counsel. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Karen. Good morning everyone and thank you for joining us for today's earnings conference call. We issued an earnings press release this morning which has been filed with the SEC on Form 8-K, and is also available on the Investor Relations section of our website at www.thermon.com. A replay of today's call will also be available via webcast after the conclusion of this call. This broadcast is the property of Thermon. Any redistribution, retransmission or rebroadcast in any form without the expressed written consent of the Company is prohibited. During this call, our comments may include forward looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and our actual results may differ materially from the views expressed today. Some of these risks have been set forth in the press release and in our annual report filed on Form 10-K filed with the SEC last May. We also would like to advise you that all forward-looking statements made on today's call are intended to fall within the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may include, among others, our outlook for future performance, revenue growth, profitability, leverage ratios, acquisitions, acquisition synergies, and various other aspects of our business. During the call, we will also discuss some items that do not conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We have reconciled those items to the most comparable GAAP measures in the tables at the end of the earnings press release. These non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to and not as a substitute for measures of financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP. And now it’s my pleasure to turn the call over to Bruce Thames, our President and Chief Executive Officer.

Thank you, Sarah. Good morning everyone. Thank you for joining our conference call, and for your continued interest in Thermon. Today, we have Jay Peterson, our CFO, joining me on the conference call. Jay will follow me and present the financial details of our fiscal 2017 third quarter. To begin with an overview of the financials, after a soft quarter of bookings in Q2, revenue was $64.3 million, fell short of our expectations for the quarter and was down 14% year-over-year and 6% sequentially. We continue to see MRO deferrals, winter arrived late and unlike most years, customers held on to those remaining capital dollars at calendar year end. Despite the revenue shortfall we did see a number of positives in our financial results for the quarter. First, margins improved for the second consecutive quarter by 250 basis points to 44.5% as we have projected in the last earnings call. Second, we had a positive book-to-bill of 130% and the second highest bookings quarter in the history of the company at $84 million. These strong bookings levels drove backlog growth of 30% to $105 million for the quarter. This is the highest backlog the company have seen since Q2 of fiscal 2015 which if you’ll recall was a record year of revenue for the company. The greatest growth was in EMEA and Asia with both geographies reaching record backlog levels. The mix of projects ranges across all of our key market sectors with power and downstream refining projects having the greatest impacts. The cost out measures noted in the last earnings call are on track to realize approximately $3 million of savings in fiscal 2017. The combination of improved margins and better cost controls resulted in $0.16 adjusted EPS for the quarter, or up $0.06 over the prior quarter but…

Thank you, Bruce, good morning. I would like to start off by discussing our Q3 financial results and then conclude with revenue guidance for the balance of fiscal year 2017. First off orders and revenues. Orders for the quarter totaled a robust $84 million versus $73 million in the prior quarter for growth of 15% and marking our second largest bookings quarter ever. This bookings growth was led by EMEA with 111% growth followed by Asia Pac at 60% growth. And as mentioned during our last conference call, we expected our book-to-bill to be positive and we delivered a 1.3 book-to-bill. Our revenue totaled $64.3 million and that’s a decrease of 14% over the prior year’s quarter. The decline was led by continued contraction in Canada with a revenue reduction of 43% and this was somewhat offset by EMEA with growth of 19%. Our MRO/UE mix for the quarter was 67% of revenues whereas Greenfield totaled 33%. Greenfield revenues declined by 25% in the quarter whereas MRO/UE declined by 7% due to a double-digit decline in the US specific to the continued to delay in maintenance spending. Our backlog of orders ended December at $105 million versus $81 million at the end of December 2015 and that’s an increase of 30%. Both EMEA and Asia ended the quarter with record backlogs. As mentioned last quarter, we are experiencing a protraction in the turns in our backlog. Several years back, our backlog would typically turn within 12 months. And at present, construction cycles continue to be protracted and our turns have increased to 18 months or so. Gross margins, margins improved over the last 90 days by 250 BPS and by 330 BPS over the last 180 days. And this increase was due to the higher mix of MRO/UE revenue versus…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Jeff Hammond from KeyBanc Capital Markets.

Hey, good morning guys.

Good morning, Jeff.

Good morning.

So, can you just give a little more detail on what kind of projects are falling into these EMEA and Asia that’s driving the strength in the orders? And then just maybe speak about the quoting activity that would suggest that either that the strength continues or doesn’t continues?

Yes, so, this is Bruce. Looking at the order growth, I noted a lot of our order growth has really been in power and downstream refining. If we look at EMEA and Asia Pacific, a lot of that growth has been in downstream refining, particularly in the Middle East and Europe and in Eurasia. And then Asia Pacific, a lot of that has also been in downstream activity although we have won a very substantial upstream project that – out of Asia that will be executed there, but will be destined for the Caspian. So, that kind of gives you an overview of the type of projects we are winning there in the eastern hemisphere. Looking forward, our quote activity remains active and has been consistent to say, I don’t know we’ll continue to book at these levels, but certainly we are seeing a sustained level of quote activity going forward.

Okay, that’s very helpful. And then, I think you mentioned, kind of into the end of the year, people didn’t spend their CapEx OpEx dollars and you continue to see deferrals of MRO, we are starting to hear, I guess, with the turn in pricing a little bit more optimism, a little bit more discussion about downstream turnarounds normalizing. Just give us your view on what you are – why you don’t think you saw it in the fourth or in the December quarter? And what the tone is as we move into calendar 2017? Thanks.

The general feeling is that, customers, most of them have a calendar fiscal year, so most of them held on to those capital dollars at year-end for cash flow reasons. Typically, we would see the opposite. You would see a flurry of spending trying to get projects completed and buying of materials right at year end and that really just did not materialized this year. So, looking forward, we’d like to see at some point, we have seen at least two years of deferred MRO spending. We’d like to see that recover. I guess, the good news that we’ve seen is our margins in our MRO has really remained stable and you can see that business recovers, it’s been very positive to the overall margin profile of the business. And that’s consistent with the history of the company.

Okay, great, thanks guys.

Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Scott Graham from BMO Capital Markets.

Good morning, Scott.

Hi, good morning. How are you doing? So, I have several questions for you. One of them kind of jumped out when Bruce, you indicated that you are expecting gross margin pressure to continue for the next several quarters. Can you be a little bit more specifically you mean by that, is that a year-over-year thing, is that a sequential thing or are we looking at margins staying 43 and below? Give us an idea.

Let me speak to that. So, margins and backlog is really what I am referring to and here is the good news is, margins and backlog has stabilized and we are seeing them at least for the last two quarters, they’ve been down but have not declined further. What we have seen, Scott, is they are down about seven points from, let’s say, levels two years ago. If you look at that backlog, just by the nature of how we measure backlog, that’s largely Greenfield work. And you can see in our margins, our MRO has actually held up. So that Greenfield is down about seven points understanding that 40% of the mix is around 280 basis points weight on margins compared to, let’s say margins two years ago. And we actually saw that almost perfectly quarter-over-quarter when we looked at our performance in Q3 of this year versus fiscal 2016. So when we talk about that, that’s what we are seeing margins and backlog largely related to Greenfield.

Right. I guess, what I wanted maybe tack on to that is, so when you say margins down 200 plus versus two years ago, margins two years ago were 50%, total gross margin. So, are you saying that margins will be in the 45% to 50% range? But I am not - I just checking a little clarity on this?

No, and so, yes the margins were 50% and I mean, you know this very well, that had a big – the biggest impact to that was the – particularly we look at two years ago, Q3 of fiscal 2015 was a record year in MRO sales and so that really drove. So the mix drove that less, when I speak of margins, two years ago, I am talking about margins and backlogs and it’s largely Greenfield. The margins you are talking about comprehensively for the business were more related to mix at that period of time and we had another seven points of margin in our Greenfield project that did sit in backlog. Does that…

That’s fine. That makes a lot more sense. And Jay, just to bring this full circle, you are expecting gross margin in fiscal 2018 to be up or just the low level of 2017, right?

Yes, it’s a little premature to make that statement. We were literally right in the middle of our budgeting cycle. One thing I would like to reiterate is that the gross margin that Bruce has mentioned in our backlog we have seen those gross margin levels since Q1 of fiscal year 2017 and some of that has already burned off into – for example, the revenue we realized this last quarter.

Got you. That’s no problem. And I do understand you are in the middle of your planning process. So, interest can be limited. Let me also understand a little bit more of a comment that you made, Bruce, you said that given the size of the backlog now, you need more resources and I guess what I am saying, what I am thinking here is that, your MG&A has been running down the last couple quarters, but in fact, not down or at least this quarter, not down as much as sales.

Right.

So, would it be particularly given that, the timing of these things continues to push out, is it not maybe a little bit premature to be adding resources to the business given those two factors?

The resources will be driven by timing for our engineering deliverables. So we will make sure that as we do add resources, it will be commensurate with the requirements for deliverables on projects and backlogs.

That’s great. Thank you for that. And the last question is this, I know you are looking at a $1 billion to $1.5 billion addressable market way back when you initially came to market publicly. What is your addressable market right now? And your desires to increase kind of – just give us the baseline now versus where you expect it to be out several years?

So, today, our addressable market is roughly $1.5 billion. Our goal is to – again, grow it three times. So that would be in the $3 billion to $4.5 billion range. We’ve identified three key periods for growth. They are all potentially with our core customer base. So we don’t have a lot of customer risk and they complement the solutions that we bring to the market today.

That’s great. Thanks a lot.

Thank you.

Thanks, Scott.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Bhupender Bohra from Jefferies.

Hey, good morning guys.

Good morning Bhupender.

Good morning.

So, Jay, just a housekeeping question here on the orders. Can you give us the core number on that 14% or 15% number?

I am sorry, Bhupender I did not fully hear the question.

On the orders, can you give us the organic orders number, gross number?

Yes, it’s a little hard to do that right now, because we have now melded or in a process of melding specific entities together. Let me see if I can double check the records. I just don’t – it might take a little digging.

Did it have any FX impact during the quarter? Like, I mean, if you have the dollar numbers for FX, I can do that.

Very, very nominal. The revenue impact for Q3 was a little over $500,000 negative, $530,000.

Okay, got it.

So I guessing the order impact is somewhere in that same range.

Okay, got it. So the other question for Bruce here, overall, you again – your press release again talked about project delays and deferrals of CapEx and the maintenance CapEx. From a geographic standpoint, can you give us a sense like and from the end-market perspective like, where do you see within your backlog, those kind of things are happening, but Canadian oil sands or is that EMEA or Asia Pacific or the US chemical, petrochem? Anymore color on that? Thanks.

Yes, year-to-date we’ve really seen a slowdown in the US and it’s, we’ve really seen two things. Revenues have been down year-over-year and we’ve seen more margin compression in the US and a lot of that has to do with the mix of Greenfield work we are doing there and higher labor on it of that work. Canada, as we saw some growth last quarter was actually down substantially. The good news there is they’ve done a very good job in cost management and so we are seeing – we are still seeing good profitability on that business despite the lower top-line. The US has been probably year-over-year has represented about 75% of the shortfall and we see that in the type of projects we are getting and just a slowdown when I speak to the chemical, petrochemical beginning to slow, we see some of that activity moderating. Eastern hemisphere has really been the biggest growth and a lot of that is really related, some of its related to independents, but a lot of it is related to state owned entities and some continued spending in investments, particularly in the Middle East, but also in Eurasia and other parts of the Eastern Hemisphere. So, it kind of gives you at least a look at – that the state owned entities are continuing to - just independent of the cycle whereas we haven’t seen the capital spending return in more of the public sector.

Okay, and within the Canadian oil sands, has things stabilized over there? Like, in terms of I think your commentary mentioned about some activity in the SAGD side of your customers?

We are cautiously optimistic there. We have seen some renewed quote activity and some plans with a number of SAGD operators. So that’s certainly positive. We don’t foresee any spending in the large major projects for big mining and upgrading, which can be very large expenditures. We don’t see that in the foreseeable future. But we have seen a lot of improvements in efficiencies and cost there in the Canadian oil sands, particularly as it relates to SAGD and we think with the rising price of oil and some of the efficiencies gained we will see some investments. The real question is timing, will that happen in fiscal 2018 or will that be beyond, so.

Okay, and lastly on the pricing, I think over the last few quarters, some of your conference calls you did mentioned that pricing has been weak. Has anything changed or have you seen stability within the pricing environment?

We don’t see it eroding further. I guess, that’s the good news. We haven’t seen it really improved. The positive sign here that it’s largely isolated to our Greenfield opportunities and the opportunity here is obviously to grow the installed base and then the MRO margins has held up and by growing that installed base we can capture those recurring revenues. And so we’ve been purposeful in doing that during the cycle.

Okay, got it. Just one more here. On the backlog, when you look backlog today versus historical, what would you say in terms of size of the project would be? I think you did mentioned that the size of the projects have come down, especially within your opportunity of like $1.1 billion which you see on your dashboard. Can you give us a sense like, the size of the projects have come down, I don’t know, like 25%, 30% like, is there a number?

When the Canadian oil sands were growing quite strong, I mean, the projects could be in the 20 plus million dollar range, even greater. We really don’t have one project in backlog that is above $10 million. We did book several projects during the quarter that were in the $5 million to $10 million range. Unfortunately, Bhupender, I don’t have the exact statistics or like the median or average project size. All I can tell you is kind of, what we’ve – more anecdotally, what we’ve seen as far as is bookings.

Okay, got it. Thank you.

Thanks, Bhupender.

Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Brian Drab from William Blair.

Hey, Bruce, hey, Jay.

Good morning, Brian.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. So back to gross margin if I could just for a second, and maybe just kind of focusing specifically on the fourth quarter, if you look at what happened in the second quarter and third quarter, the revenue levels about the same, the mix of Greenfield and MRO is about the same and you had this big step-up in gross margin of 250 basis points from second quarter to third quarter. What can you tell us about the mix and what you are seeing, you are almost half way through the fourth quarter in terms of the direction that gross margin goes in the fourth quarter and then maybe the magnitude of the change?

Yes, it’s a little preliminary, but what we are seeing is consistent more so what we have seen in Q3 than in the prior quarters. And – but lot of that is going to be predicated on the mix of MRO/UE.

Okay. Got it. And then, this was discussed somewhat earlier on the call, but as you look out to fiscal 2018, and you are going to be entering that year it looks like with pretty solid backlog, Bruce you just mentioned some good projects coming in, in the $5 million to $10 million range. Does that potentially skew the mix more toward Greenfield and potentially put maybe a cap or some pressure on gross margin as you enter 2018 relative to 2017 and I know Jay, you are going to say it’s pretty much sure, but is that – at least a thought that that makes sense?

So, yes, Brian let take this one. So, looking forward, I guess, as you know this will all be dependent upon what happens with MRO and maintenance spending. And so, because mix has such a big impact on the margin profile of the business and so, it’s really hard to predict. You know, at some point, we have to see some level of recovery in MRO spend. Now, we haven’t finalized our plans for fiscal 2018. So, really not prepared to tell you what we anticipate those spending levels to be and how that will impact mix. But we would expect Greenfield margins to continue at the level we have seen in the last two quarters in fiscal 2018 based upon our current backlog and the length of time it we’re seeing it takes to execute these projects.

Okay. Got it, thanks. And then, can you just may be this is a question for Jay, but talk specifics about the restructuring. I think you said in the past to reduce spending by $6 million or $7 million in fiscal 2018. Where are you again in terms of completing those restructuring actions and is this OpEx level that we saw in the third quarter representative of what we see going forward? Or is it – does it step down in terms of dollars from here as we move forward?

Yes, the total we talked about was $6.4 million and roughly half of that was SG&A and half of that was cost of goods sold. Some of that has – actually most of the SG&A has gone through the P&L and the same with the cost, but I think the comment that Bruce made were we are going to manage our spending based on the level of activity is really the prudent point here. And that, if the business starts growing, there will be additional people required to execute that backlog and we will be able to provide some more comment and guidance on this once we finalize our budgeting plans for this upcoming fiscal year.

Okay. Got it. And then, the last one and that something I’ve discussed with Sarah quite a bit offline, but can you comment on the recent activity regarding the pipelines, more news about Dakota pipeline today and Keystone and how what the opportunity is? And it sounds like it’s modest if anything on the pipeline itself, but what that does for your business upstream and downstream potentially?

Yes, Brian it’s Bruce. So, there are some opportunities on the pipelines and sales particularly around the pump stations and any type of terminals, things like that. But the real opportunity is really on either ends, both in upstream, downstream as that all comes down into the Gulf Coast, the opportunity is around capacity expansions or maybe some shifts in refining capacity to handle the heavier crude and the same would be true in the oil sands and really giving them access to market lowering the breakeven point for their production. They are particularly in Alberta and that will create opportunities for us either – on either end of those pipelines.

Okay. Thanks very much.

Thank you.

Thanks, Brian.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Charlie Brady from SunTrust Robinson Humphrey.

Hey, thanks. Good morning guys. A - Bruce Thames Morning, Charlie.

Just want to go back on the incremental expense or the adding additional resources question, I understand that this is going to be tied to working off the backlog and getting resources in, but, there is generally going to be a lag, and I guess, I am trying to understand the lag time, you’d have to bring people in, engineers in, to in fact effect those orders and the time before you recognize revenue and the profits on it, or is it strictly all kind of percentage of completion would be kind of an immediate offset to that?

Yes, it’s kind of a difficult question to pinpoint an answer on Charlie and that some of the engineering expense could precede revenue and we would put that expense on the balance sheet until we incur the revenue. So there wouldn’t be a significant jump in spending followed two quarters later by the revenues.

Okay. I guess, that’s the point I was trying to get to is really understand the dynamics of how that worked and it sounds like it’s pretty straightforward. If you look at the $105 million impact, while you talked about the duration of that backlog stretching out versus what it used to be, how much of that $105 million do you think ships over the next 12 months?

90% to 95% of it. For example, when we look at how much it’s been protracted, the great majority of the orders have been booked in the last 12 months and let’s say 10% or so preceded that. So, assuming we continue to see the delays that we’ve seen over the last year it will primarily all of it will ship between the next 15 to 18 months. But it’s not skewed to the 18 month mark. I guess, that’s the point I would try to make.

Got it. Now that’s what I was trying to understand. That’s very helpful. Just your comment on the revenue guidance, down 7% depending on the timing of orders and we all understand how this stuff looks around. But I guess, can you give us a sense of the downside risk? I mean, is there – it sounds like there is not a whole lot of really large orders that could really skew it one way or the other right at the end of the year, but I guess, I am trying to understand the potential downside from the 7% if stuffs slips out a few weeks or a month or something like that?

It would be relatively small. I mean, a lot of this will depend around revenue recognition terms and the ability to ship partial. So, it would be within $1 million of revenue. We are not talking about $5 million. So it would be within $1 million of revenue.

Perfect. Helpful. And then just one more for me, your commentary on the holding back of CapEx at the end of the year which is unusual, have you seen those dollars released at all? Are they still kind of holding on to it? It sounds like they are probably still holding on to it?

That’s what we’ve seen thus far. We haven’t seen them being released. We did – if you go back, I am just talking more about the – less about spend, but more around orders. We had such a weak bookings quarter in Q2 of this year. The good news is we saw them release those order in Q3 and so, but we have not seen the spending that year end spending we suspect that, that we are now in a new fiscal year for most of those customers and we would expect this to be a new capital plan for the year and we will watch what happens to overall capital spending in calendar 2018 and our fiscal 2018.

Great. Thanks a lot. That’s all for me.

Thank you.

Thank you and our next question comes from the line of Jon Braatz from Kansas City Capital.

Good morning, Bruce, Jay.

Good morning, Jon.

Have a few questions about your Russian expansion. How big initially are you – is that operation going to be? And should we – two other questions, should we consider the revenue opportunity an incremental opportunity? And then secondly, will there be any significant start-up costs associated with that expansion in the Russia?

Yes, Jon, so, we’ve seen significant growth in EMEA this year and a lot of – a significant piece of that is related to not only in the Middle East but Eurasia. Our investments there in Russia, we will start-up this plant in the Moscow region are really to support the customer base in that region. It gives us a lot closer proximity. It gives us local content. It gives us a cost basis in the ruble. And so, all of those things really position us much better to continue to win and grow our presence in the region. Russia is really a significant producer or probably the second largest producer globally. If you look with roughly 10 million barrels of oil equivalent daily produced there, so, we see a lot of opportunities, cold climate, all of the things that are conducive to being a very heavy heat tracing intensive market. So, as far as start-up cost, we have incurred some of that is been in the spending, but largely the capital expenditures are up on the balance sheet will be, will flow through once we have completed the plant start-up, we are adding staff now. We have already begun a very small levels of production and are producing some assemblies there. But we will begin full production in – by the end of the first quarter in fiscal 2018.

Okay, okay. And secondly, Bruce, there has been a lot of talk about oil and gas opportunities, sort of infrastructure spending in Mexico as they denationalized the industry. And – are the Mexican, assuming money is spent on there, but are there opportunities for you if indeed that unfolds the way some people think it might?

Yes, we believe there are opportunities over the mid to long-term right now. We just have to see where all of this goes and how it moves. Right now, I’ll tell you those – the spending in Latin America in the oil and gas sector has been extremely low and, but we are beginning to see some signs, particularly in Mexico of some spending that maybe forthcoming.

Okay, okay.

Although certainly not at historical levels.

Yes, sure. Absolutely. Okay, all right. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Martin Malloy from Johnson Rice.

Good morning.

Good morning, Mart.

Just looking at the schedule of number of ethane crackers expected to come online this year through 2019, along the Gulf Coast and derivative petrochemical pipes, are there potential opportunities for orders for those plants out in the front of you? Or have lot of those orders already been placed?

A lot of those orders are currently in backlog and we are in the process of executing them. We have three major ethane units that we are currently working on. Some have begun to deliver. Others will be delivered over the next 18 months.

Okay. And then, on the maintenance side, it’s been some time that we’ve seen lower maintenance spending here. Can you maybe talk about practically speaking and looking back your – the history as a company, how long can the customers defer spending maintenance or maintain it at a very low level? Is there some point that, just the corrosion of the pipes and valves that they are going to need to catch up?

That’s a general belief. So, right now, what we’ve seen is, when there have been issues, customers are doing kind of the minimal required to maintain a sustained operation. So, we do believe at some point that there are safety issues, regulatory issues, those are things that will demand and require that maintenance to occur. I mean, there is – there have been a lot of deferrals of turnarounds, particularly in the Gulf Coast. You are beginning to see and hear that based upon crack spreads, refined product inventories, things like that, that these end-users are now beginning to plan and execute those turnarounds. So, based upon that, they’ve got to repair rotating equipment, flanges, valves all types of things like that. Lot of those are then heat traced and so it will create some opportunities for us coming forward or going forward. Again, I’d love to be able to predict exactly when that will occur and to what levels. But conventional wisdom says yes, that spending needs, you will to return at some point.

Okay, thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Charlie Brady from SunTrust Robinson Humphrey.

Yes, just a quick follow-up, one housekeeping one. Expectations for tax rate in Q4?

For tax for Q4, Charlie, we are expecting a little over 24% - 24.2% based on projected revenues.

Great, thanks.

Thank you. And I also show another follow-up from the line of Bhupender Bohra from Jefferies.

Just a follow-up on the Russian manufacturing here, can you give us the size of the revenue capacity for that manufacturing facility? Like, over time, as you start producing and delivering products or how should we think about that?

We would expect the revenue – the production capacity to be, maybe in the $7 million to $10 million range within the first year and then that would grow over time.

Okay, got it. And the other question, somebody did on the call previously talked about regulation, now we have seen some of the regulation-driven businesses like the power business which you have, any issues or anything you have heard in terms of as we hear more about deferred regulation with EPA and with the Trump administration, kind of doing some sorts of things or changes which could delay regulations. Anything which you think would be of any significant impact to you going forward or no?

Yes, I guess, the biggest area around – is around environmental regulations. We see that impact our business in a couple of areas, particularly around the move on cogen facilities and the need to have reduced emissions and monitor those stacks that drives our tubing bundle business and creates really opportunities for those and those facilities we’ve seen that today. The other area is just the tightening of fuel regulations. There is going to new CAFÉ standards in the US are going to drive a whole round of investment in downstream refining. We are also seeing the tightening regulations in Europe drives the need for lower sulfur, cleaner fuels, a lot of the – if you look at the Middle East, the clean fields project is all-time related to that. We are seeing a lot of the downstream spending in Russia is tied to that as well. We also see the new standards on marine fuels and moving to a lower sulfur content that’s going to drive a lot of investment and lower – and sulfur recovery units and things like that over the next three to five years. So, environmental probably is the biggest regulatory driver that impacts our business really in many areas.

Okay, and that would be, could you remind like how much of you revenue would be tied to that kind of…

No, unfortunately, I don’t have that number.

Okay. No problems. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. And that concludes our question and answer session for today. I’d like to turn the conference back over to Thermon for any closing comments.

All right. Well, thank you all very much. We appreciate your continued interest in Thermon. Thank you for joining us today.