Welcome to Teekay Tankers Ltd’s Second Quarter 2021 Earnings Results Conference Call. During the call, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this call is being recorded. Now for opening remarks and introductions, I would like to turn the call over to the company. Please go ahead.

Before we begin, I would like to direct all participants to our website at www.teekaytankers.com where you will find a copy of the second quarter 2021 earnings presentation. Kevin and Stewart will review this presentation during today’s conference call. Please allow me to remind you that our discussion today contains forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from results projected by those forward-looking statements. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to materially differ from those in the forward-looking statements is contained in the second quarter 2021 earnings release and earnings presentation available on our website. I will now turn the call over to Kevin Mackay, Teekay Tankers’ President and CEO to begin.

Thank you, Ryan. Hello, everyone. Thank you very much for joining us today for Teekay Tankers second quarter 2021 earnings conference call. I hope you and your families are all safe and healthy. Joining me today on the call today are Stewart Andrade, Teekay Tankers’ CFO and Christian Waldegrave, Director of Research for Teekay Tankers. Moving to our recent highlights on Slide 3 of the presentation, Teekay Tankers had negative total adjusted EBITDA of $6.8 million during the second quarter, down from $15.9 million in the prior quarter. We also reported an adjusted net loss of approximately $42 million, or $1.23 per share during the second quarter compared to an adjusted net loss of $22 million or $0.65 per share last quarter. Our results are largely due to weak spot tanker rates, heavy drydock schedule period during the quarter, and the expiration of fixed rate time charter out contracts secured during the strong tanker market last year. Despite a challenging quarter, we continue to have a strong balance sheet, with pro forma liquidity of $274 million and a net debt to capitalization of 36% at the end of the second quarter. In addition, as previously announced, we are in the process of lowering our cost of capital by refinancing vessels that have been in higher cost sale leaseback structures, which Stewart will elaborate on later in the presentation. Lastly, spot tanker rates continued to be very weak in the second quarter due to the ongoing impact of COVID-19. This weakness has continued into the early part of Q3. Looking ahead, although the near-term outlook is uncertain due to COVID-19, we believe many key indicators for tanker market recovery continue to improve, which I will touch on in more detail later in the presentation. Based on our forward view, we counter-cyclically…

Thanks, Kevin. Turning to Slide 7, we highlight the company’s strong financial foundation. As Kevin mentioned in his opening remarks, we continue to have a strong balance sheet, which provides us with financial strength and flexibility. We have a pro forma liquidity position of $274 million and a net debt to capitalization of 36% at the end of the quarter. Since November 2020, the company has declared options to repurchase 8 vessels that were under higher cost long-term sale leaseback financings. In May, 2 of these vessels were repurchased for $57 million using existing liquidity and thus remain unencumbered, while the remaining 6 vessels are scheduled to deliver in September for $129 million. We have signed term sheets and during the documentation stage to refinance all 8 vessels with lower cost sale leasebacks for a total refinancing amount of $142 million, which we expect to close in the third quarter. As mentioned in prior presentations, one of our strategic priorities is to reduce our cost of capital and this refinancing will result in an estimated interest expense savings of approximately $11 million in the first 12 months. Lastly, having reduced significant amounts of debt in 2020, our debt repayment profile is very manageable in the coming years, with no significant debt maturities until 2024. With that, I will turn the call over to Kevin to conclude.

Thanks, Stewart. As I have said in past quarters, I would again like to thank all of our seafarers and shore-based staff for their continued dedication to providing safe and uninterrupted service to our customers during these challenging times. We continue to focus on the safety and wellbeing of our seafarers as we look forward to the continued transition to a more normalized world. With the strong financial position and high operating leverage, we believe that Teekay Tankers is well-positioned to continue to weather the current market challenges and benefit from an anticipated tanker market recovery in the quarters ahead. With that, operator, we are now available to take questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And we will go first to Jon Chappell with Evercore ISI.

Thank you. Yes. Good morning and good afternoon. Kevin, first question, you mentioned the second half values are up 20% and it seems like the disconnect between asset values and the actual market itself is widening almost by the week. And you guys have a pretty diverse fleet as it relates to age. So, it’s almost like the market is kind of giving you a gift. And I understand you want to keep your operating leverage given your view on the market, but whether it’s scrapping or selling maybe some ships that are a little bit less core than the more modern ones. Have you thought about taking advantage of that opportunity and monetizing some of your ships in a market that’s kind of still really difficult?

Yes, it’s a good question, Jon. I think we have said in the past we are open-minded in terms of how we approach our sales strategy on some of the older units. So, if the right opportunity comes up at the right price, it’s something that we will definitely consider. At the moment although asset prices are up, the activity levels have dropped off in the last couple of months. So, as of now, we haven’t really seen anything that we can conclude on, but it’s certainly something that we keep an eye on.

And Stewart, I kind of asked the sale leaseback every quarter I feel, but maybe I will just ask it a different way this time, if this lasts longer than most of us think and you’ve certainly laid out a thesis on the recovery in the market that’s in line with ours, but it’s also continuing to be pushed to the right a little bit. How many unencumbered vessels do you have? What’s your opportunity to maybe refinance some other vessels, just other liquidity triggers that are not the obvious sale and leaseback refinancing that you have accomplished over the last year?

Hi, Jon. So in total at the moment, we have 3 vessels which are unencumbered, 2 of them that we just repurchased in May and we intend to refinance in September as I have mentioned in the prepared remarks. Aside from that, we have one other vessel, which is unencumbered at the moment. In terms of other levers to pull, as you can see from the sale leasebacks that we are currently doing there, we do have a group of lessors who are happy to work with us and that we can do higher leverage financings on if we choose to do so. So, I guess the main lever I would point to is the number of vessels that we have in commercial debt financing that we could move into sale lease backs and that market is quite diverse in terms of the loan to value can achieve depending on the counterparty you go with and the interest rate you are willing to or think is prudent to pay. So, I think we still do have a fair amount of headroom there. As you mentioned, we have laid out the thesis for market recovery. And we have taken some sort of taking vessels on longer term time charter, I guess, which underlies our confidence in the market improving in the short and medium-term.

Okay. If I can just sneak one last quick one in Kevin on the third quarter to-date rates, you laid out the repositioning issues associated with the Suezmaxes, was there similar in the Aframax? And then also, is there anyway to quantify the impact of those, because usually the numbers that publicly traded companies like yourselves put up are much better than maybe the industry benchmarks and that’s not necessarily the case this quarter, so a little bit surprising by just how low those figures are?

Yes. I think, I mean, obviously, we’ve got to acknowledge that the market is at historic lows. And as a result of that, it is challenging perhaps more so on the Suezmax side than on the Aframaxes to keep to keep the tonnage moving and to get the right voyages. So yes, the differential there on the ballast portion is definitely more of a Suezmax issue than it has been on the Aframaxes. And that’s really a function of the fact that the Suezmax is more of a global trading ship. And in our case, we happen to have a number of ships that were coming out of drydock in China as well as we positioned a few ships into the Asian market in the prior quarter. And we found with the lack of supply coming out of Saudi Arabia despite their increase in production, we felt that it was best to reposition ships further our field and to stretch our program out. So this quarter, we had quite a number of ships that have the ballast leg issue. So, it’s more confined to Suezmax than anything else. In terms of quantum, I don’t have the exact figure with me, but it was a couple of thousand dollars a day at least have an impact, which we – as the quarter goes on and those ships get into position and are fixed away, we will get the revenue to offset that and we should come up to more market related levels than what we are posting here at this point in the third quarter.

Okay, that’s great. Thanks, Kevin. Thanks, Stewart.

Thanks, Jon.

Thanks, Jon.

We will go next to Ken Hoexter with Bank of America.

Hey, great. Good afternoon. Can we just talk a little bit about the – Kevin, the – is it typical to see asset values climbing ahead of the inflection in spot rates or typically do you see the spot rates move and then see the asset values climb, it seems like we are doing a little bit of backward, is that just the typical anticipation or is this an abnormal part of the move here?

Now, the asset values typically, we will look at a number of factors, one being newbuilding prices and the other one being where the forward market is likely to go as opposed to where the actual market is right now. And I think both of those factors have come into play. We are seeing asset prices are – quite significantly in the first half of this year, driven off of a very increase – very large increase in newbuild prices on the back of constrained supply. So, that has been a big driver. I think also, its sentiment driven, although the current spot market is historically weak, people are looking at the fundamentals that continued to show improvement month-on-month. And it’s a question of timing, as to when the spot market catches up with where people’s perception of where the asset price, and the time charter price has been going. Christian, do you want to give any more detail in terms of the newbuilds or secondhand price increases over this last few quarters?

Yes. I think it’s not unusual to sometimes see the asset values move ahead of the freight market. I think the degree to which it’s happened this year has been a bit unusual. And I think as Kevin has pointed out, it’s due to various factors, some of which have nothing to do with the tanker market. So, the newbuild prices have definitely rocked it up this year. And it’s not really due to tanker orders, it’s due to all the container ship orders are getting placed, and the highest steel costs and then that kind of filters into the modern secondhand values. And then at the older end of the spectrum, as well, we have seen high – very high scrap prices. They have been the highest since I think 2008. And then you have also had this year, a few state owned companies that have been active in the secondhand market and are probably more willing to pay up and push the market there. So, several factors that have driven the pricing up, as Kevin said, I think it was also in anticipation of some better times ahead. But I would say that the degree to which they have decoupled this year has been a bit unusual.

It’s helpful. I appreciate that Christian. Thanks. Kevin, just one follow-up, the move to more Saudi local production, as COVID creep-on, on kind of demand that’s going on with Delta. What signs do you see for the recovery? I guess maybe I am trying to figure out your timing thoughts. As John mentioned, it keeps getting pushed out to the right, so what’s your thoughts on when you see this inflection in the market rates, right? Just especially given the low numbers here, you are talking about what you are seeing in the market now?

It’s going to be really difficult to capture it towards the exact quarter. But as we pointed out on slide 6, some of the things that we look at in terms of global oil demand, relative to where it’s been, inventory levels coming down, global oil production, both from OPEC+ as well as non-OPEC, that is starting to come back. And that just opposed with the ever improving sort of tanker, or the book relative to fleet five picture that we are seeing fleet supply going forward. And if you look at all of those, all the metrics are heading in the right direction. I think, what we have highlighted in our commentary is we are having said that going to see some regional dislocations because of COVID. And you will see as this is happening right now, in a few parts of Asia, where companies or cities, sorry, not companies, countries or cities are going into some form of reduced mobility and restrictions on travel and things like that. And we think that will continue. But overall, the macro picture seems to be continuing to improve quarter-on-quarter.

Great. I appreciate that. Thanks for taking my questions.

Thanks Ken.

We will go next to Randy Giveans with Jefferies.

Hi gentlemen. How is it going?

Hi, Randy.

Hi. Two questions for me. First, you chartered in those three Aframaxes to crude oil product for 18 months to 24 months, I guess how did this come about? Why these vessels in this segment and why that duration?

Yes. I think we have spoken about it in the past in terms of our capacity to look at expanding our spot exposure through the use of in charters. We have done it a number of times quite successfully. And then it’s always been incremental or accretive to our bottom line. So, we are always in the market looking at the potential to bring in ships. And at this point, looking at where spot markets are, it’s obviously there is a disconnect between the time charter rate and the current spot market. So, looking at short-term, six months, 1 year deals were obviously off the table, but given our conviction that over the course of the coming quarters, and certainly over the next 2 years to 3 years, we do see a return of some better freight rate environment. So, timing can – you can never time it perfectly. I don’t think in 2013, or 2014, when we did a large in target program, the last time that we called it exactly right on the quarter. But the duration allows us the ability to absorb somewhat of a weaker market at the front end so that we can take advantage of what we think will be attractive rates in comparison to where spot rates are, 2 years to 3 years out. It was really putting our toe in the water and starting to build our book. And then seeing what develops over the coming quarters. And we will probably make a decision whether to add to that or to continue to sit on the sidelines from here.

Okay. And then in terms of your vessels and industry wide, there has certainly been a subdued nature of scrapping despite low rates, high steel prices, when do you think that turns? What causes that to turn? You have some 17 plus year-old vessels? I guess, at what age do you start looking at scrapping those? And then how big of a discount are those older vessels earning relative to a more modern eco build?

Christian can probably give you a better rundown on the scrap environment right now. But in terms of the way Teekay looks at our fleet, obviously, we have a couple of ships that are getting up to the 17 year – 18 year range. So, we are constantly looking at what is our forward view of the earnings on our ships versus either selling them at today’s pricing or trading them out to scrap. At this point in time, we haven’t made any decisions to send those ships to scrap. We still believe that this market will return in time for our ships to be accretive. But as I said to John on his question, we are also at the same time looking at the sale market. And if the right price comes along for those older ships, we will certainly execute on them. Christian, do you want to give some more color on the actual scrap macro picture?

Yes. I think earlier in the year scrapping looked quite large, you said, Randy. I think that’s probably a function of owners maybe had some deeper pockets after the good run we had at the end of 2019, in the first half of 2020. But we definitely have seen an acceleration in the last sort of three months, four months. I think, if we look at script – scrapping year-to-date, we are getting close to 7 million deadweight, which has already doubled what we had last year. We had about 3.5 million deadweight last year and the same in 2019. So, I think the very low freights rates we are seeing now as you pointed out, the high scrap prices are just starting to kick start a bit of that scrapping. And I think that will then continue into the next couple of years, because we are starting to get into kind of the part of the fleet – age profile there would be a lot of ships turning age 20-year or hitting that kind of 17-year, 18-year to 20-year old bracket over the next 2 years, 3 years. And it’s another reason why we are sort of more positive on the market looking ahead to next year and particularly 2023. If you look at that year on the Aframax as I think we have got 72 ships that are turning age 20 years. So, I think this is we are kind of at the beginning of this kind of scrapping phase. And definitely has been a little bit of an uptick here in the last two months or three months.

Got it. That’s it for me. Thank you.

Thanks, Randy.

We will go next to Magnus Fyhr with H.C. Wainwright.

Yes. Thank you. Good afternoon. Just a follow-up question on these chartered in vessels, I mean, the rates have been pretty flat on the 3-year. Have you seen much changes on the 2-year rate or did you feel like you have got a really, I mean, the rate here hasn’t changed at all in the last couple of months as you have been looking at these opportunities?

Yes. Hi, Magnus. Yes, we did actually – we have seen some movement on the 2-year coming off to the levels that that we took the ships in on. And that was why we felt that maybe now it was a time to start executing. The 3-year rate has held up pretty strongly. And that’s why looking at our 2-year deals with the options to extend for the third year. That gave us the optionality to carry it through, which we believe will be a pretty strong market at that point in time. But yes, I mean, earlier in the year, when asset prices were up higher, there was maybe a bit more conviction in the time charter market that the second half would kick off in earnest in June. We saw the 2 year rate is certainly higher than where it is today. And that was why when it came off, I think we did the first – the first ship at the end of Q2. And then early in July, we pulled the trigger on the next two. So yes, it’s come off a little bit, could potentially come off further if the spot market doesn’t improve in the coming weeks. But there is also not that much activity, and it’s fairly quite across the market.

Got it. So, I mean, so I guess this is a kind of one-off deal. But you think there is what’s the – you said the liquidity is quite low. But you think there is appetite to do more of these charter, I mean, from the other side?

Appetite from ship owners to give us ships, you mean or?

Right. Right, at these levels? I mean, including more, if you want it?

I think we probably could. Certainly, we were looking at another one. And we decided not to pull the trigger. From our standpoint, as I said, we have in the past we have built up quite a large in charter portfolio. And going into the stronger market, you may see us do more or be a bit more active in terms of building up some scale. But I don’t think we should be pulling the trigger all at one time. And we felt that doing one or two, ended up doing three at this point. As I said, the market, if the spot market continues to be weak for the coming weeks, you may see the numbers come off a little bit more, or reassess our forward view and what pricing we are seeing. And we may take some more or we may, as I have said, sit on the sidelines and wait till the green shoots in the spot market actually start to bear some greener color. And maybe then we will go back in and do some more of it. Where – it’s something that we constantly look at, on a daily basis. And I don’t think we are going to get the timing perfect. But it’s certainly something that going into a stronger market. It’s an area or a lever that we have pulled in the past that I think we can certainly pull again, was more than just the three ships.

Great. Thanks for the additional color.

Thanks Magnus.

And at this time, there are no further questions. I will turn the call back to the company for closing remarks.

Stay safe and we look forward to speaking with everyone in three months time. Thank you.

This does conclude today’s conference. We thank you for your participation.