Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Thomson Reuters Second Quarter 2014 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] And as a reminder, today's conference call will be recorded. At this time, I'll turn the conference over to your host, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations, Frank Golden. Please go ahead.

Good morning, and thanks for joining us this morning as we report our second quarter results. We'll begin today with our CEO, Jim Smith; followed by our CFO, Stephane Bello. Following their presentations, we'll open the call for questions. [Operator Instructions] Now throughout today's presentation, keep in mind that when we compare performance period-on-period, we look at revenue growth rates before currency as we believe this provides the best basis to measure the underlying performance of the business. Today's presentation contains forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially due to a number of risks and uncertainties discussed in reports and filings that we provide to regulatory agencies. You can access these documents on our website or by contacting our Investor Relations Department. Let me now turn it over to the CEO of Thomson Reuters, Jim Smith.

Thank you, Frank, and thanks to those of you on the call for joining us. Today, I'll discuss the second quarter's results, our first half performance and our expectations for the balance of the year. Stephane will then review the second quarter results in more detail. Now for results for the quarter. The second quarter results built upon the good start in the first quarter and our performance for the first half of the year was consistent with our full year expectations. We remain focused on our overarching objective, which is to build a platform to achieve higher and sustainable growth in the future. Our approach targets 2 areas: first, increasing organic revenue by improving execution and fostering innovation; and second, simplifying the business to drive scale and provide the resources needed to fund our growth. I'm confident that this approach will enable us to improve earnings and free cash flow per share. For the quarter, total revenues were up 1%, reflecting another exceptional quarter for Tax & Accounting, strong growth from IP & Science and improving underlying growth for Legal, partly offset by Financial's revenue decline, which reflected the lagging impact of negative net sales for the prior 12 months and a decrease in transaction revenues. Despite this revenue decline, our Financial business continues to make progress and broke into positive net sales territory for the quarter. Net sales have now shown year-over-year improvement in 6 of the last 7 quarters. And we do expect this improving trend to continue over the balance of the year. On the cost side, we continue to make good progress as evidenced by a 210 basis point improvement in Financial's Q2 EBITDA margin if you exclude charges for both periods. At the consolidated level, both EBITDA and operating income growth were tempered by…

Thank you, Jim, and good morning or good afternoon to you all. As we always do, I will speak to revenue growth before currency throughout today's presentation. This first summary slide provides a snapshot of our second quarter and 6 months results, which do reflect the impact of the charges we took during the first half of the year. As mentioned in our press release, these charges had a $30 million impact at the EBITDA level for the second quarter and a $40 million impact for the first 6 months. For the comparable periods last year, we incurred charges of $9 million and $87 million, respectively. And we still expect full year charges to total approximately $120 million. Now second quarter revenues were up 1% with flat organic revenue growth. This is in line with our guidance for flat revenue growth for the full year. Our Financial & Risk segment declined 2% and was down 3% organically, while our other businesses grew 5% in aggregate during the quarter and 3% organically. Adjusted EBITDA in the quarter was up 2% with an EBITDA margin of 27.8%, up 20 basis points from the prior year period. Excluding charges from both periods, the EBITDA margin was 28.7% in the second quarter compared to 27.9% last year. This 80 basis point improvement was primarily the result of cost savings related to the ongoing simplification efforts in our Financial & Risk business. Foreign exchange had a 10 basis points positive impact on the margin this quarter. Finally, underlying operating profit increased 2%. And excluding the charges, it was 6% with the margin up 70 basis points from last year. We continue to expect margins for the full year to be within the guidance we provided in February with the second half a bit lower than…

Thanks, Stephane and Jim. And we'd like to open the call for questions. So operator, if we could have the first question, please?

Our first question is from the line of Sara Gubins with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

Could you provide us a bit more color on net sales, particularly what you're seeing in Europe in F&R? Really nice to hear that the declines continued to get better there. Maybe breaking it out between regional versus larger players and just the tone of what they're talking about has been [ph] to the back half of the year?

So Sara, let me try to address that question. As Jim said, I think net sales were positive in the Americas and Asia for the second quarter, and they were still negative in Europe. But actually, Europe saw the biggest improvement. They were significantly better in Europe than in Q1 and than in Q2 last year. I'd say, generally speaking, the positive trend we are seeing in net sales is driven both by a slight improvement in what we call gross sales, but primarily driven -- and improvement is like single-digit, I would say, in percentage terms, and a strong improvement in cancellations. That is the cancellations are declining at a rate which is double-digit in the first half. So that's really what's driving the sales performance, so it's driving by an improvement in our retention rate overall.

Great. And then separately, on Legal margins. The margins have outperformed our expectations for the first half of the year, which is good to see, given the declines in print. Could you talk about how you're getting there and help us think about what Legal margins might look like in the back half of the year?

Yes. I mean, I would give you the same guidance as we've always given, which is that we expect margins for Legal for the full year to be roughly flat in aggregate. So I think that what you see in the first half reflects really pretty strict cost control from the Legal business. We do want to continue to invest behind the growth areas of the business as we're doing elsewhere in the business. So there will be some investments for growth in the second half. But overall, within that constraint that I just mentioned, we want to essentially maximize investment for growth while maintaining margins in that business.

So given the strength in the first half, margins might be down in the second on investments?

They might be. Yes.

Next question comes from the line of Drew McReynolds with RBC Capital Markets.

Just a quick follow-up from the previous question, just on net sales. Stephane, can you just comment broadly, are you seeing an improvement in the operating environment? Or are you getting kind of more market share gains within each category? Or is it a combination of both? And just -- can you comment on the Thomson ONE migration? Obviously, this one is going to take a few years as customer contracts roll off? Are you gaining reasonable visibility on retention rates as you migrate that Thomson ONE terminal to Eikon?

Yes. Let me -- Jim here, Drew. If you don't mind, let me provide a little color on that one and Stephane can follow up on any specifics that I miss. I don't think there's any one thing that I can point to. We do not see a marked improvement or change in the market dynamics. That said, we have seen now for some time, the past several quarters, a better market environment in the Americas, a strengthening market environment, in particular, our sales execution in Asia. We've seen it, as I mentioned, I believe, on the last quarter call, if you looked at the long tail of our business in Europe, that began to stabilize over the last couple of quarters, and now we're seeing some bottoming out, I think, of activity with the largest European players. That said, it's also been down to some really good sales execution by our sales teams. And frankly, it's the better product that we're rolling out leading to increased retention rates. So it all kind of goes together. If I had to sum it up, I would say it's a result of us executing better in a still-tough environment. That's the headline I'd wrap around it. And I think as we now move to the buy side, it will be a longer process. And I mentioned that earlier in my remarks because it's not the same process as going through just switching out Eikons at same price points. We're moving multiple products on to common platforms. And I think, as I said, we're very early into this journey, and we're working with our customers as we begin that migration. We're encouraged by the way it's starting out. We're encouraged that we're going to have an opportunity to construct some attractive product offerings and services, particularly on the buy side. But it's still early -- it's still early days to talk about what that will look like and they have a track record there, just in early days encouraged.

Our next question is from the line of William Bird with FBR. William G. Bird - FBR Capital Markets & Co., Research Division: I was wondering if you could just give us your thoughts on the durability of the positive net sales for F&R. And separately, could you also talk about kind of how the business is trending in desktop? Are there any proof points that you'd highlight that suggest improved competitiveness?

I think -- boy, we've been floating around that positive line over the past -- over several quarters of even up, down, up, down. I think what I do believe is that the trends of improvement against prior quarters will continue. That's certainly what we expect. We're seeing improvements because when you look at the dynamics driving that, we expect to see continued improvement. As to whether or not that is positive improvement in any particular quarter in the current environment, that can turn on 1 or 2 contract negotiations. So I'm hesitant to call each and every quarter, particularly in the fragile kind of environment that we're dealing in right now. All that said, underlying, I do believe we're going to see continued improvement in that sales performance. And we're pretty confident in that, Bill. And as far as proof points go, the only ones I can point to -- and I don't want to get into specific customer examples. I can just say that we have improved competitive position across the board. We monitor our head-to-head bake-offs with our customers. And we're in a position now where we're winning our fair share of those competitive, head-to-head bake-offs with competitors. William G. Bird - FBR Capital Markets & Co., Research Division: And just to clarify on the positive net sales, did you see improvement in both desktop and enterprise?

You know what, I don't have these details handy. Let us check on that and get back to you, Bill. I don't know what the answer is on that. I would suspect the answer would be yes, but we will confirm.

Our next questions will come from the line of Manav Patnaik with Barclays Global.

This is actually Greg calling out for Manav. I want to talk on Legal. During your Investor Day, you talked about potential synergies from integrating your information assets, like Westlaw, with some of the software and solutions offerings. I was just wondering what inning we are there and what you view as the ultimate opportunity.

Sure. I'd say that we're in early innings there, as we're just beginning -- as we're really beginning that journey. And I think that the ultimate opportunities is pretty big. And again I guess, for competitive reasons and the fact that we're in the early earnings, I don't want to telegraph exactly what the product pipeline might look like there. But we've already begun to put more software solutions around Westlaw in going into the small law firm market. We see great opportunities to take commercial data from our Financial business and wrap that into solutions for law firms as well. Those are active products that we have in development and testing with large law firm customers right now. We think there's great opportunity in the corporate sector to combine both legal information around business development tools and analytics. So we think there's a very solid opportunity there, but we're in early innings of focusing our resources behind those development efforts.

Okay. And maybe big picture on what you're seeing from the U.S. legal industry, both in terms of profitability and headcount, what you're seeing there and how that's impacting the business.

Look, I think it's still a challenging environment there. And we're obviously very closely woven into the fabric of that industry and very in tune with trends there. I would say there is a recognition across the industry that the world has changed and that we are operating in a different environment. That said, we've seen demand now up for a couple of quarters in a row, which is encouraging, not massively so. We've seen some of the big profit drivers, the drivers like litigation in the U.S., be subdued, continue to be subdued. So that's putting a lot of pressure on. But we've also seen some hiring pick-up it looks like as well, which would be in front of the trend of demand pick-up. So I would hope that a lot of firms are anticipating things, getting, I think, steadily better in the space. But I think it's going to be a challenging environment in the Legal space. It's a changed environment in the Legal space, like most everything else since 2008.

Next, we will take questions from Vince Valentini with TD Securities.

If I can just pin you down specifically, if the trends in net sales in F&R continue to get better every quarter, you were positive in Q3 last year. So does that mean you would explicitly expect positive again in Q3 this year?

Vince, it's a good question. As Jim said, we do expect the positive trend to continue. We do really don't want to call 1 quarter separately. But we certainly do expect that if you look at the second half as a whole compared to second half of last year, it will be better.

Okay. And given you continue to get better retention, and I think your customer satisfaction is improving as you get the new products rolled out, do you have any thoughts about rate increases for January of 2015? Do you think you could start to sort of harvest some of this better product quality you have with better rate increases?

I think it's way too early to be thinking about that as we put our plans together. I frankly think that we -- if you look at the overall installed base that we have, I'm more focused on what a 1 percentage point improvement in retention could do for our business, plus constructing attractive packages for people who aren't customers today. So I think we're going to be very, very cognizant of the market that we live in. And frankly, there are a lot of other benefits that we can get on price that come from just broader price discipline across the whole of the organization, as opposed to what a headline rate increase might look like. So that wouldn't be our top priority at the moment, Vince.

Yes, that's fair. And last one, Stephane, just a clarification. The foreign exchange in this quarter, you've got a bit of a boost to revenue. Was there any material impact on EBITDA from FX swings?

I think I mentioned it was about 10 basis points for the quarter. It was 10 bps positive, yes.

We'll go now to the line of Ato Garrett with Deutsche Bank.

I just have a question on the timing of restructuring costs because looking like with restructuring costs coming in at about $40 million year-to-date, so it seems like for the $120 million, that things are going to be a little bit more back half-weighted for the year. Just given that back half-weighting of the restructuring costs, should we continue -- or do we need to change how we should continue to think about the 30% EBITDA margin target that you previously stated for F&R? Or would there be like a timing change there, or should we still think about that in the way you originally phrased it?

No. I don't think you should -- that should trigger any change to the target. As we get the cost in this year, we should see the benefit next year.

Next, we'll take questions from Toni Kaplan with Morgan Stanley.

You've been buying back a lot of stock over the past few quarters. And so how should we be think about the trajectory for the next $1 billion program? Should we expect it would be a slower or a similar pace?

Right. So that's a hard question to answer, Toni. I mean, you see what we've done, right? We announced the buyback. At the time we announced it, we got questions on whether our intent was to complete that buyback or not. Our actions speak louder than words, obviously. So I would say we have absolutely the same intent for the second buyback that we just announced, which is to complete it. How quickly can we do that? That will depend on a number of factors, market conditions and elsewhere. But we do intend to continue to buy the stocks certainly.

Okay, great. And then your adjusted EBITDA margin in the first half was 27%, so the top of your guidance range. Just walk me through, like did you consider raising the range? And why or why not?

So we're keeping the guidance very much where it is. And as I mentioned in my remarks, I would expect margins probably to be a bit lower in the second half than they are in the first half. And the biggest factor for that is what the prior question was getting at precisely, which is if you look at the one-time costs, our margin guidance does include the $120 million of one-time costs that we expect for this year. In the first half, we spent $40 million. So if you make the math, that indicates that in the second quarter (sic)[half], one-time costs should be $80 million or thereabout or twice the level what we spent in the first half. So that will have an impact on margin, of course.

We'll go to the line of Tim Casey with BMO.

Tax & Accounting, obviously the fastest-growing business. Can you talk about the sustainability there and your efforts to expand that franchise geographically?

Sure. We think it's imminently sustainable because -- and the growth rate -- to start with, we have a very solid professional business serving the professional accountant space in the United States, and that's been a consistent mid- to high single-digit grower for us kind of year-after-year. And we're very, very pleased with that business. The real growth has come from our expansion outside of the United States. And we've been able to do that pretty dramatically over the last few years from basically being a U.S. domestic business to now almost 20% of the revenues are now coming from outside the United States. And we're doing that really by following our corporate customers around the globe in the build-out of that Global Tax workstation, which was a combination of organic build to put it together and some key acquisitions over several years. And as the global economy gets knit tighter together, more and more corporate customers need solutions for multiple geographies. And we've got a great platform that scales and some good businesses, capabilities and analytics on the ground that we just think that, that's a very attractive business that has all kinds of room to grow. And as I think Stephane mentioned in his remarks, we've actually added resource there to hold -- while we've seen underlying margins in that business had expanded, we've allowed that business to hold margins flat, so we can invest in feet on the street, particularly in growth geographies, so we can gain even greater scale there. So we think there are a lot of good -- we talk about headwinds in certain sectors of our business that are out there. We think our kind of Global Tax and trade businesses have a lot of tailwinds there pushing them along. And we're investing heavily behind those. At the same time, we're working to control cost across the business.

Do you notionally have any targets as to what you think the non-U.S. business -- do you think of that 20% ratio becoming 50%? Or do you think about it in those terms?

Well, I hope the U.S. business continues to grow as well. So I hope it becomes bigger. I suspect it will become a greater percentage. But I'd like to see the U.S. business continue to grow as well. So the percentage might not get to that kind of -- same kind of level. But it well could be -- get to a place where it's 1/3 of the business or so, I would guess.

Our next question is from Peter Appert with Piper Jaffray.

So Jim, I'm trying to understand the arithmetic of the positive net new sales. You've highlighted 5 of the last 6 quarters have been positive. But it doesn't look like the total organic revenue growth number has really moved meaningfully. And I think that's true for the subscription-based revenues, too. So am I missing something?

Peter, I mean, we haven't said that net sales have been positive over the last 6 quarters. We've said that net sales showed an improvement in 6 out of the last 7 quarters. But if my recollection is correct, they've only been positive this quarter and in Q3 of last year. So they've been negative for most of the quarters.

Okay, I got it. Sorry, my mistake. And then Stephane, can you remind me the mix in your business in F&R between buy side and sell side? And would you call out significant differences in performance in the 2 businesses?

Sure. It's been predominantly on the sell side, which has been obviously under more pressure from a market perspective than the buy side. As a matter of fact, we are now, as Jim said, in the process of starting to convert and migrate our buy-side customer base on the new unified platform, but that's a much smaller proportion of the total segment.

Okay. And then just one last thing, at the risk of incurring the wrath of Frank here, the comment on the tax rate, Stephane, I think you said 13%, 14% for the year. You're obviously running below that in the early parts of the year. So implication is tax rate takes a fairly meaningful step-up in the second half?

No. The guidance is 13% to 15% for the full year. And year-to-date, I think we are about 14%, so [indiscernible].

We'll go to the line of Doug Arthur with Evercore.

Yes. Jim, the F&R results are pretty impressive, given, as you cite, the transaction pressure in the low-vol environment. So I guess, my question is, if low vol continues in the second half, what is sort of in order of importance, FX, commodities, et cetera? What are sort of the top 3 vulnerabilities for you on the transaction side of the F&R business?

Sure. Let me try to answer that question, Doug. If you look at the transaction revenue base of F&R, it's about $800 million a year, right? I'd say above -- and that's divided by what I would broadly speak about buy side and sell side. So about 40% of that base is more buy side-related. These are things like FXall, for instance. And the buy side is not that affected by the volatility levels in the market. Corporate treasurers will continue to hedge on whatever rolling basis they have, 12 months, 2 years, whatever, regardless of market volatility. It's on the other side that the lack of market volatility essentially -- I mean, volume rather is driven by the need of portfolio managers or asset managers to rebalance the portfolio. When there's no volatility, there's much less need of rebalancing, which drives trading volumes down. So where we are most impacted by that would be our foreign exchange dealing platform. Tradeweb, on the foreign exchange transaction piece of the business, is also impacted. And as I said, that's about 60% of the transaction revenue base. So hopefully, that helps you calibrate what we're dealing with here.

Next, we'll go to the line of Aravinda Galappatthige with Canaccord Genuity.

Just with respect to the cost reduction in F&R, I mean, we've seen a fair bit of restructuring, particularly in Q4. How should we think about the cadence of the lower cost? I mean, I saw a lot more cost reduction in Q2 if I look at the OpEx in F&R that we saw in Q1 on a year-to-year basis. Does Q2 sort of encapsulate all the restructuring work in Q4? Or is there more to go as sort of the timing scales down?

It's a very good question. As we've said, right, we are on a trend towards that goal of nearing 30% margin that we've stated before. The progress that you're going to see on a quarterly basis will be uneven because it really depends on when you can retire a product or -- it really happens in like big shifts here and there. So Q2 was a very good quarter, most definitely. I would say there's going to be like probably if you look at what we've discussed in terms of platform shutdown, we should see an improvement towards the -- I would say the end of the first half of next year should be quite -- that's where I would expect like another big improvement related to the elimination of these platform we talked about, the band [ph] optimized network platform. That one is in the process of being converted to Elektron. We've got to run the platforms on a dual basis for a while. And then once our customers are comfortable with the new platform, essentially you can shut down the old one. And that's when you see a lot of the savings. So a long-winded answer to say you will have some variances from quarter-to-quarter. What's important to look at is really the trend and what happens over a 12-month period.

And just a quick clarification. Americas and Asia with respect to net sales, do you see a quarter-over-quarter improvement there as well?

Yes.

We'll go to the line of Matthew Walker with Nomura.

The question I have is on the Legal side, which is you pointed towards the Peer Monitor improvements. My question really is do you think -- or over what timescale could we see an improvement in the online research growth rates? That's really the question because obviously you've got quite a lot of products within the Legal business. So when you're talking about improved headcount, slightly better environment in Legal, how quickly could we see an improvement in the online legal research business?

Sure. It's a good question. Online research is really 2 components: the print base, which is about $500 million in annual revenue base, that one I would characterize as being in structural decline, so we are going to continue to see declines every quarter; and the online piece, which is obviously much larger, about $1.2 billion or so in the U.S. And we're starting to see some improvement there. If you look at the rate of growth of that component in one of the slides we have in the presentation, you can see that the decline was 1%. And that was a progress from last quarter, where the decline was 2%. So you're starting to see some progression there. And I think that's a reflection of the improving market environment we've seen over last 4 quarters.

And do you think that will continue in the next -- so you're thinking maybe Q3 or Q4, we might see a sort of a flat or a positive number for that business?

It's going to be gradual, but we hope that we're going to continue to see improvement. Yes.

Okay. I believe that was our final call. So that will -- that was the final question rather so that will conclude this quarter's call. So thanks very much for joining us.

And a reminder, today's conference call is available for replay beginning today at 10:30 and running through August 6 at midnight. You may dial into the replay service 24 hours a day using the toll-free number of (800) 475-6701 or the international U.S. number of (320) 365-3844 with the access code of 330612. And that does conclude our conference for today. We thank you for your participation and for using AT&T Executive TeleConference. You may now disconnect.