Good morning. My name is Stephanie, and I'll be your conference operator today. At this time, I'd like to welcome everyone to Trinity Capital's Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Ben Malcolmson, Trinity Capital's Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, and welcome to Trinity Capital's Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Speaking on today's call are Kyle Brown, Chief Executive Officer; Michael Testa, Chief Financial Officer; and Gerry Harder, Chief Operating Officer. Joining us for the Q&A portion of the call are Ron Kundich, Chief Credit Officer; and Sarah Stanton, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer. Earlier today, we released our financial results, which are available on our website at ir.trinitycapital.com. Before we begin, please note that certain statements made during this call may be considered forward looking under federal securities laws. Please review our most recent SEC filings for further information on the risks and uncertainties related to these statements. With that, please allow me to turn the call over to Trinity Capital's CEO, Kyle Brown.

Thank you, Ben, and thanks, everyone, for joining us today. Trinity Capital is experiencing strong momentum right now, and our investors are seeing the benefits from our diversified platform, our internally managed structure and our continued growth. 2025 was a banner year for us. We achieved records in many major operating categories. Our 5 complementary verticals continue to drive real diversification and our internally managed structure creates accretive value for shareholders. Together, those advantages clearly differentiate Trinity in the private credit space. Major highlights from 2025 include excellent operating results with record-setting net investment income of $144 million, or $2.08 per share, a transition of monthly dividends, providing more frequent income for shareholders as well as continued consistency of our distributions. Sustained momentum with our originations engine as we achieved a record $1.5 billion of fundings and $2.1 billion of commitments and significant growth of our managed funds business through the establishment of several co-investment vehicles, which provide new liquidity to the platform and incremental income to Trinity shareholders. We finished the year with an especially strong fourth quarter. Here are some of the highlights from Q4. We delivered $40 million in net investment income, a 15% increase compared to Q4 of last year. Our net asset value grew 10% quarter-over-quarter to a record $1.1 billion. Platform AUM increased to more than $2.8 billion, up 38% year-over-year. We maintained strong credit quality with non-accruals at less than 1% of the portfolio at fair value. Trinity paid a fourth quarter cash dividend of $0.51 per share and announced a $0.17 per month distribution for the first quarter. Trinity shareholders have now been the beneficiaries of more than 6 consecutive years of a consistent or increased dividend. Trinity Capital continues to outperform in key metrics. Our return on equity and effective yield…

Thanks, Kyle. Our operational and financial performance remained strong in the fourth quarter. We generated $83 million in total investment income, a 17.5% year-over-year increase and $40 million in net investment income or $0.52 per basic share, representing 102% coverage of our quarterly distribution. Beginning in January 2026, we transitioned to a monthly dividend of $0.17 per share, maintaining the same aggregate quarterly payout and aligning the timing of our distributions with the recurring nature of our investment income. Estimated undistributed taxable income is approximately $69 million or $0.84 per share, which we continue to reinvest for the benefit of our shareholders, while maintaining a consistent and meaningful distribution. Our platform continues to deliver top-tier performance, generating 15.3% return on average equity, among the highest in the BDC space. And our weighted average effective portfolio yield remained strong at 15.2% for the quarter despite the declining rate environment. Net asset value per share increased from $13.31 at the end of Q3 to $13.42 at the end of Q4, reflecting accretive capital raises. Full NAV rose 10% to $1.1 billion, up from $998 million at the end of Q3. We further strengthened our capital base by raising $95 million through our equity ATM program during the quarter, at an average premium to NAV of 12%. During the quarter, we also entered into a new secured term loan, extending the maturity profile of our liabilities and further diversifying our capital base. The facility was priced at a spread below our existing revolving credit facility, contributing to an improvement in our overall cost of debt. Additionally, in Q4, we raised $28 million of gross proceeds through our debt ATM program at a 1% premium to par. Our co-investment vehicles continue to enhance returns contributing approximately $3.1 million or $0.04 per share of incremental net investment income benefit in Q4. We syndicated $47 million to these vehicles during the quarter, and as of December 31, we managed $400 million in assets across our private vehicles. Our net leverage ratio remained consistent at 1.18x at quarter end, with strong liquidity, diversified capital sources and capacity across the Trinity platform, we are well positioned to underwrite a robust pipeline, maintain strict credit discipline and deploy capital in high conviction opportunities. To discuss our portfolio performance in more detail, I'll now pass the call over to our COO, Gerry Harder. Gerry?

Thank you, Michael. Our portfolio continues to demonstrate exceptional strength driven by broad diversification across 22 industries with no single borrower representing more than 3.9% of total exposure. Our largest industry concentration, finance and insurance, accounts for 14.6% of the portfolio at cost and is diversified across 25 portfolio companies. Credit quality remained consistent quarter-over-quarter with over 99% of debt investments performing at fair value. On our 1 to 5 scale, where 5 indicates very strong performance, the average internal credit rating was 2.9, consistent with prior quarters and reflecting the addition of high-quality originations and continued strong portfolio management. Quarter-over-quarter, the number of portfolio companies on nonaccrual remained at 4. During Q4, 2 relatively small debt financings were added to nonaccrual status while 2 prior nonaccrual investments were realized and rolled off. As of December 31, non-accruals totaled $15.2 million at fair value, representing less than 1% of the total debt portfolio. At quarter end, 85% of total principal was secured by first position liens on enterprise value equipment or both. For enterprise backed loans, the weighted average loan-to-value remained consistent at 17%. During 2025, our portfolio companies collectively raised more than $7.8 billion in equity emphasizing the strength of our borrowers and their continued access to capital. Across our 5 business verticals, we're seeing deployment begin to smooth out more evenly, a trend we expect to continue in future quarters. The approximate breakdown of our fundings in Q4 was as follows: 27% to sponsor finance, 25% to Equipment Financing, 20% to Life Sciences, 15% to Tech Lending and 13% to Asset-backed Lending. Looking ahead, our portfolio remains defensively positioned with a strong first lien bias and low loan to values. Our momentum, disciplined underwriting and diversified platform allow us to continue delivering consistent dividends and NAV growth. With a shareholder-first mindset, our team remains focused on building a best-in-class BDC that generates sustained long-term value for our investors. Before we conclude our call, we'd like to open the line for questions. Operator?

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Casey Alexander of Compass Point.

On most of these calls so far this quarter, we've been talking a lot more defense than offense. But I think Trinity appears to be in a position to play offense. And because of your 5 verticals, your software position appears to be indexed below most of the peer group. So I'm wondering is there an opportunity that is going to be arising for you to take advantage of the turmoil if other platforms are unwilling or unlikely to continue with software loans, is there an opportunity to convert some of those to equipment finance loans where you have a collateralized position on it in front of the enterprise value and thereby earn some better spreads and better risk-adjusted rates of return.

Yes. Casey, thanks for the question. Yes, we see it that way. I mean, one of the reasons why our percentage of assets in that category is low is because we entered that space really in earnest in the last 2 years. And that's because valuations were significantly too high and pricing was very low. And we decided to enter when we did as valuations started to come down. And we thought that was a great entry point. Our attachment rates could be lower. We could have more aggressive pricing and -- so we are being opportunistic right now. I think, in particular, our kind of sponsor finance, I think, $3 million to $30 million of EBITDA, lower middle market software companies with AI -- that are AI-enabled, it's a massive opportunity. We think there's going to be a lot of consolidation of a lot of these companies that maybe couldn't get to scale. And so with access to the capital markets, with access in our fund management business to private capital, we have liquidity, and we will continue to be opportunistic there.

We'll take our next question from Doug Harter of UBS.

This is Cory Johnson on for Doug. So I was just wondering, are there any parts of your portfolio that give you any concern or either -- perhaps areas that you've lent to traditionally, but you're a bit more cautious around currently? And are there any verticals that you're particularly looking to lean into a bit more during the time?

Cory, thanks for the question. So historically, we focus on industries that are emerging that are disrupt -- have disruptive technology, moats around that technology. They are well capitalized. Equity dollars are flowing into that particular industry that has always been part of our underwriting, and that hasn't changed. So our investment philosophy and kind of where we direct dollars continues to evolve and change over time as new and emerging technologies kind of ramp up. And so we'll just continue to see where the market is going, where equity dollars are flowing. And then, of course, with our loans being shorter-term duration and fully amortizing, in many cases, we continue to get paid off where industries are evolving and maybe not receiving as much equity dollars. And so that continues to bleed off in industries that are not getting the attention they used to and new dollars are being deployed into emerging markets. And so that has been our philosophy. That continues to be the philosophy going forward.

We'll take our next question from Brian McKenna with Citizens.

Okay. Great. So I know the focus today is continuing to go deeper across all 5 of your verticals. I'm curious, though, and you touched on the deployment environment a little bit, but given the pickup in volatility, there's clearly dislocation across the sector. I mean, would you ever think about leaning into any strategic opportunities here if the environment stays like this. You clearly have a strong and liquid balance sheet. You have access to debt and equity capital. So I'm wondering if this would be a period where we could actually see go from 5 verticals to 6.

Great question. And Sarah is kicking me no forward-looking statements here. So it's a great point. We are going to continue to be opportunistic. I mean, we are making sure that we have plenty of ample liquidity available to us so that in a market where there is volatility. And I would say most of the volatility that we're seeing so far has a little to do with kind of portfolio volatility, but much more to do with kind of valuation volatility. Our game plan all along has been to make sure that we have liquidity to take advantage of markets when there is less liquidity, less competition, maybe private companies with funds that have reached their duration where we can be opportunistic and jump in there. And so the answer is absolutely yes, and we'll continue to kind of keep our eyes open and be opportunistic as opportunities present themselves.

Okay. That's helpful, Kyle. And then one more, if I may. I know growth of the RIA and your third-party asset management business is a big focus area for this year. What are you hearing from these LPs, potential investors in some of these third-party funds with all the focus, all the volatility in and around private credit today. And I'm trying to figure out for Trinity, could this actually be a positive for this business related fundraising, related growth as some of these allocators maybe look to diversify away from some of the larger players in the upper middle markets. And really, as folks look to kind of have more exposure to uncorrelated assets and performance.

Yes. I mean I personally love the volatility. There has been a massive amount of inflows for years going into just a small number of upper middle market firms and with rates low, they've been able to deploy and deliver decent returns. Well, that's changed. And now we have an opportunity to stand out in a unique way by delivering outperforming results. And I think investors they're going to love that. And we have the ability to generate higher returns, and we've been doing it consistently. And so there's outflows happening. You're seeing in the news often now. I think what we're seeing is more and more interest and more inflows as we continue to build out our fund management business. So I see this as a really great year and opportunity for us to stand out in a unique way in what has been a crowded space for the last 5 years. And so that's what we're hoping to achieve. And as we wrap up kind of SBIC fund and roll into kind of future fundraising, we're really positive on it right now.

[Operator Instructions] We'll take our next question from Erik Zwick with Lucid Capital Markets.

Just as I take a look at the kind of breakdown of your fourth quarter originations, both in terms of absolute amount in dollar terms more weighted towards the existing portfolio, which I think is just a testament that you selected solar companies to invest in, they're growing and have more needs. Curious looking towards the pipeline today? Is the mix still weighted maybe more heavily towards existing portfolio needs versus new needs and kind of curious also what that might mean in terms of your perception of the quality of new investments that you're looking at, whether tighten spreads or more competition has impacted the attractiveness there?

Yes. I think over the last year, we've been focused on new logos and new investments, and that has been the majority of our deployment and then I think our portfolio is unique. When we are deploying to our current portfolio, a lot of that is going to be equipment financing facilities where they have multiple draw schedules. And if they're hitting their milestones and growing, then we're building out more capacity or if they're delayed draw term loans, these companies have reached some, again, hit milestones, hit hurdles and earned their ability to receive more capital. So it's all new investments to growing companies, and that's the vast majority of our fundings, and that's not going to change. I don't think you guys want to add anything to that?

Yes. I mean, Erik, our backlog, as you've seen, it's over $1 billion, 1/3 of that is to our equipment channel. So as they build out their manufacturing lines, they're going to fund alongside that. And a small percentage of that $1 billion is subject to legal miles -- legally-binding -- most of it is subject to milestones or additional due diligence.

I think it would be fair to the number of -- the number of new logos in Q4 was relatively small, right? And so I think that's idiosyncratic. So I don't expect that to continue at that level. But we're pleased to deploy to those existing portfolio companies.

I appreciate the commentary from all of you there. Just turning to credit quality a little bit. It's nice to see that nonaccrual still remain very low and well below peer averages, as you mentioned, did have 2 realizations, but then 2 new credits added to the nonaccrual. To the extent that you can comment on ZUUM and 3DEO. Anything noteworthy in their developments there that have been moved to nonaccrual and then how you are approaching working with them to get them through the difficulties.

Thanks, Erik. This is Ron. Yes, those two clients, those are legacy borrowers. They've been in the portfolio for quite some time. They're a bit storied and at the highest level, they got in positions where they stop making payments in Q4. So they're put on the nonaccrual list. We're actively working them as we speak. And we expect to have -- as of today, we'll see what the outcomes are.

We'll move now to Christopher Nolan with Ladenburg Thalmann.

Gerry -- I think it was Gerry or Ron. You mentioned that you're seeing portfolio companies raise more capital equity. Can you give a little color? Is this private equity sales or these follow-on investments from existing investors, are these things mostly or tangentially related to AI.

Well, it's all of the above, right? We've got some portfolio companies accessing the public markets. We've got other portfolio companies raising through their VC or PE sponsors. I don't know that within our portfolio, I would say much is directly related to AI.

I mean, yes, I've nothing to add to that.

Yes. This -- I mean, I think what you're seeing is just what you've been seeing for years now, which is the VC market is robust. There's nearly $100 billion deployed in Q4. And so the companies we're lending to, they're growing, they're raising capital and so it's just -- it's really not a surprise that they were able to raise it with the size of the market where it is today.

Yes. The only issue with that point is 70% of the VC dollars going towards AI or AI-related stuff. So it seems to be pretty concentrated.

Yes, I would agree with that, Chris, except if you think about it, right, because our portfolio, we enter at that growth stage, right? So we're entering in businesses that are actively growing revenue base, right, and not sort of new entrants into a space. So I think maybe some of the newer VC dollars are going into AI-driven companies, but companies that were founded, say, 5 years ago that are now in growth stage and are raising equity, that's more what the trend portfolio looks like.

Great. And then as a follow-up question, given all the turmoil that's affecting software and things like that, is there any consideration of having the entire investment portfolio valued more frequently than currently is?

Yes. I mean the answer is no. And I think maybe that would make more sense if you had a significantly larger exposure to enterprise SaaS. Our exposure is relatively low and it's relatively new. With -- in every 1 of those deals already had an AI filter and underwriting filter put into it. So meaning we are looking at these companies and understanding their moat, right, understanding how and what their AI road map looks like and so the investments we've been making, I mean, 2.5 years ago, they called the machine learning, and that's what we were looking at. And now it's called AI, right? And so I think AI will continue to evolve, and it will continue to be tools that a lot of our companies are utilizing, but it's not necessarily changing. And we have not seen within our portfolio any detriment to those companies.

Yes. And I would add, Chris, as Kyle said in his prepared remarks, right, enterprise software is about 9% of our assets. About 3/4 of that is originated by our sponsor finance team, so these will be 18 months or newer cohorts and backed by private equity, where we're in front of their dollars, right? They've got significant cash in these businesses. So from a valuation standpoint, we feel good about where we are in a first lien role there. Now has their equity valuation changed? Probably, right? But from our debt standpoint, we don't see degradation in the debt valuations in that case.

We'll take our next question from Mickey Schleien with Clear Street.

Most of the high-level questions have been asked. Just one high-level question on my behalf. We see different ways of defining portfolios in terms of industry segments across the space. I do see your software allocation that you mentioned of, what was it, 9.3%? Is there software buried elsewhere in the portfolio or is that the total amount?

Yes. I mean the answer is that is the total amount of enterprise software companies that we are currently invested into.

Yes. I mean that's the concentration of where Software-as-a-Service business model, right? Certainly, within other types of portfolio companies, they're going to be using software and AI and machine learning tools. And so yes, there is some embedded inclusion there. But this is something that as we underwrite these companies, we're keenly aware of that they've got to show how this AI revolution is accretive to them and not an imminent threat in underwriting. So yes, pure SaaS, 9.3% embedded elsewhere, sure. I couldn't tell you exactly where and how much, though.

I understand. Could you also give us a sense of the proportion of the portfolio that's invested in second lien investments?

Yes, it's 15%. I think that was in the prepared remarks. So we're going to be 85% attached to first lien on enterprise, equipment or both.

Terrific. And lastly, was there anything nonrecurring in interest expense for the quarter because interest expense went up more than your debt balances and the incremental debt was at lower cost. So I'm just trying to triangulate that.

Yes, Mickey, this is Mike. There was a tick up in early repayments this quarter. So you'll see there was some acceleration of OID included in interest income.

I was referring to interest expense.

On the expense side? No. I mean, I think you'll see that tick up with average outstanding loan balance of our revolver. But yes, on the expense side, it's been -- we actually improved our cost of debt this quarter with the secured term financing. But that's going to be fluctuated. The floating rate is the revolver in the term loan.

At this time, we've reached our allotted time for questions. I'll now turn the call to Kyle Brown for any additional or closing remarks.

Well, on behalf of the Trinity Capital team, thank you for joining us today. Now we appreciate your continued interest and investment in Trinity Capital, and we look forward to updating you on Q1 results during our next earnings call on May 6. Have a great day. Thanks.

Thank you. This brings us to the end of today's meeting. We appreciate your time and participation. You may now disconnect.