[Call Starts Abruptly] year-end and fourth quarter results presentation. As a reminder, all participants are in listen-only mode, and the meeting is being recorded. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. If you wish to ask a question, please click the Q&A icon on the left-hand side of the screen. You will see the options to raise your hand, to join queue and ask your question verbally, or write a question to submit your question in writing. When you are introduced, your line will automatically be unmuted. For analysts who have joined us today into the conference, you can click on 1 on your telephone keypad and join the question queue that was as well. I would like to now turn the meeting over to Stephen Mullowney, TRX Gold Chief Executive Officer. Stephen?

Yes. Thank you, Christina. Before we begin the call today I'd like to recognize that our Founder and Chairman passed away during the quarter and during this year and all of us here had a good relationship with Mr. Sinclair and he'll be greatly missed. So with that, this is our 2023 year-end conference call. Obviously, we'll have an Annual General Meeting conference call in the new year as part of the Annual General Meeting, and I'm quite excited for what we have in 2023. We had a significant amount of growth. We're really starting to see what the potential is for the Buckreef Gold Project. We had another plant expansion. We have another one underway. We're getting a much better sense for the geological potential of the property and are quite excited for that and where that can go over time, particularly hopefully increase the resources on our property quite significantly as well as continuing to increase the production profile of the property as well. So 2023 was a great year. We're quite excited for today's call and for where we're going as a company as well. So, obviously, there's cautionary note. We will be talking about forward-looking statements, so I'd ask everyone to go to our website and our corporate presentation to read the cautionary note. Today's speakers obviously are myself; we have Andrew, raise your hand, our COO here in Toronto; we have Mike, our CFO here with me as well; and Christina is joining us from Montreal. So TRX, a lot of you will hear this in our presentations. We're a very growing company. We have experienced management team that continues to deliver a rapid growth both on a production side, specifically on the production side, and we have a exciting blue sky potential on our…

Thank you, Stephen. Good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us. As Stephen touched on, it was a record year operationally for us at TRX. We produced almost 21,000 ounces on the year that was in line with our full year guidance of 20,000 to 25,000 ounces and that was after us having brought the 1,000 tonne a day plant online back in October of last year. We sold all of what we produced during the year at an average realized price of $1,845 an ounce for the full year. You can see in Q4, gold prices exceeded $1,900 an ounce and are now trading beyond $2,000 an ounce. In fact, this morning, we were up over $2,050. So record levels and certainly suggest record growth going into next year. In terms of financials, the record production drove record financial results as well. As Stephen touched on we had record revenues of over $38 million. Our cost of sales came in at just over $20 million which meant a gross profit of over $18 million or almost 50%. So a very cost effective high margin operation. We had record net income of $7 million, EBITDA of almost $14 million and importantly operating cash flow over $17 million which got reinvested back into the business, so I'll touch on that. But again for investors who've been tracking this story, this is the third year of growth since we've come on board. It's been year over year over year growth and we certainly expect this growth to continue into next year as we expand to 2,000 tonnes a day. On the cash cost side, we recorded cash costs of $904 an ounce for the full year. Now this was above the high-end of our previously guided range of $750 to $850 an ounce.…

Excellent. Well, thank you, Michael. That's great. Financial metrics are improving significantly and we continually expect those financial metrics to improve into this year, which we'll get into guidance again and these are, I think it's fair to say projects that you get it going and then you're able to expand it much more quickly over time. So it's almost like pushing a snowball off a hill. It gets bigger and bigger and bigger as it goes down that hill, and it gets easier to do. Yes. So we're quite excited for that. And one of those factors is the sulphides. So we were in an extremely wet season last year. It was raining. I think it was once in a 100 years or something like that, Andrew, with regards to the rainfall in the spring. And so when you're into that environment, hard rock is easier to process than oxide rock, because hard rock is not as sticky, doesn't have clay in it, and sulphides -- sorry, oxides do. So we pivoted a little bit to the sulphide to see how they would work. They worked out just fine. I believe 2019 or 2020 metallurgical study, 2020 preliminary metallurgical study said that we should get recovery rates in the mid to high-80s. That's what we experienced when we put the mill feed through our mill. And subsequently, that will go into the long-term mine planning now and into the current mine planning. So this is significant, because 90% of the resources on the Buckreef Main Zone are in sulphides and we are hitting the sulphides. Who's that on top of the -- in the pit there, Andrew, on top of the harder rock?

Well, that's, Paschal. That's our Senior Mining Engineer who is clearly demarcating the sulphides, which you can see, which has come from rock is -- that's kind of gray color. And that particular rock is actually running at 5.8 grams a tonne.

And so, Andrew take -- in the picture on the bottom, can you take the investors through what they're really seeing in the pit? Because you could see the transition zone, you could see the oxide zones, and you could see it started sulphide zones.

That's right, Stephen. Thank you very much and good morning to everybody. So in the photograph on the bottom, obviously if you look at the pit itself you'll see the top part of the -- very top part of the pit you'll see the brown layer. That is our top soil. Then we go into sort of the ochre orange colors, that is our oxide zone. It's about 20, 25 meters thick. And then if you just look right at the back of the bottom of the page, you'll see the gray rock. And that is sulphides and so we've started to expose the sulfides in the very deepest part of our pit, which is what you've been talking about here with the whole example.

Yes. Exactly. So on to the next slide, the 2,000 tonne per day mill expansion. So as I've explained to lots of investors over time, we are on a pay as you go program, and what does a pay as you go program mean? It means that as the business generates cash, it will be reinvested into the business to grow it. So that essentially means that timelines can move up and timelines can move backwards, depending on hitting target. So as Mike mentioned, in Q4, we ran into power issues, which have subsequently been resolved. And we also had a motor go down which was really related to power issues from a bus. So we didn't hit the production profile. Although we hit year-end guidance, we were a little bit behind on where we were ideally hopeful to getting to. So that has delayed and the pay as you go program, the mill expansion a little bit, but not a lot. And so we expect this project to come on or -- in the first half of fiscal 2024. The mill is on site. The other long lead items have been ordered. We are going to expand, and this is a little bit of a switch from what I explained previously. The crushing circuit will be expanded first to over 2,000 tonnes a day. That will enable us to put in place a expanded crush stockpile which will give us more consistent mill feed and I'm hopeful and I'll be pushing the team to get over a 1,000 tonnes a day while we have that crushing system up and running. We have budgeted for that, but that's the goal. And then subsequently to that the rest of the system will come online, including electrical works. The plinth will be…

Thank you, Stephen and thank you, Mike. And as you know I particularly like this slide. We're going to be here for a few minutes folks and do bear with me. As you can see we did have a program that was just under 7,000 meters of drilling including infill sterilization and pure exploration. As Stephen you already mentioned that we've been able to extend mineralization to the North a little bit deeper to the South. It's right underneath the South pit, about 500 meters there to the Northeast and Southwestern at depth. And we've also been able to get some exploration results through the drill bit now on the Anfield and Eastern Porphyry which has confirmed multiple zones of strong mineralization that is subparallel and in close proximity to the Buckreef Main Zone. And this is a very, very important opportunity for future mineral resources. Why do I say that? The way to sort of secure continuous increases in throughput is probably to have several pits available to us. We'll have the main pit, we'll have the South pit in time. We will also be going underground and I think this is the first time you've heard me talking about this deposit brought to underground. Through archaeological work we have been able to delineate and define 2 to 3 high grade shoots and so I'm very confident to say this deposit will go underground and that also talks to a much longer life of mine. But in multiple pits Main Zone South pit, and then, Anfield and Eastern Porphyry, that gives us optionality and continuity of our mining.

I'm just going to pause you there, Andrew, for a sec before you get into that. So why don't you explain to the investors when you determine how you switch from open pit to underground and the importance of strip ratio in that and just so the investors can understand how you make that economic decision?

It's a really, really good question, Stephen. It's also a very, very important part in our mine planning and scenarios that we're currently in the middle of doing. So once the strip ratio gets say high maybe 6, 7 to 1 or that kind of number, it becomes more economical to go underground. And we have to find those high grade shoots. And when we go underground, we also would be mining at a higher grade over those 20 to 30 meters. Those widths we have made for very economical mining and underground environments in the stripping that we'll be doing. So it will be a cost tradeoff between strip ratio, so all turns plus the widths we have to mine, versus the developments that we have to put in place to go and mine the stopes underground.

So given we have a vertical deposit.

Perfect.

As you go around and you go deeper, you have to strip out and you have to get your valves angled properly. So given that we're vertical and 20 meters wide, this deposit is very susceptible and good rock continuity. It's very susceptible to underground mining. And it probably will be cheaper over time, the underground mining at the pit.

It will be and also the quality of the underground. We've seen already from preliminary reports, it's very good. And I can also talk from my own background as an underground miner that the rock is very, very good for underground mining.

So we won't need to see as we were talking about this morning, all kinds of underground, steel supports that add up to the cost because we -- where you got very common of rock where you put bolts and mesh in.

That's right. We won't. And just as a quick comment you know we are mining through some very, very small amounts of old stopes from the old days that's in the reports. And that those stopes and that development has stayed open for the last 40 years. No. It's still there.

Yes. I pictured that the other day. That's an important point. How the old stopes have been there 40 years, they've been flooded, not dried up. We've pumped them out, and they're still very intact.

That's correct. It's been very good. So, very quickly one of the highlights -- and I've -- of course you'd expect me just to choose 2 of my favorites and I have. On the Eastern Porphyry what have we seen here? Our best result here was a 14 meters great width at 3.5 grams a tonne including 3 meters at just under 11. And do note that, that is from 27 meters below surface. It's very, very close to the surface. In addition to that, we've got the Anfield Zone. So it's about another 1.5 kilometer away. We intersect at 2.9 meters at 13.7 grams a tonne. Again, quite shallow from 43 meters. And some of the investors that have been with us for a couple of years, you might -- and I think it's the end of the presentation though Christina, we still have the picture of a guy holding a rock and that is from the Anfield Zone. So we drew all that position and here we are just under 3 meters. That's nearly 14 grams a tonne. A great result very early in the program. I still remain very, very bullish on that overall trend. And then underneath the South pit, we've been very pleasantly surprised by getting wide zones of mineralization at between 1 to 2 grams a tonne rate, similar to our main deposit. And we're actually currently doing water in the South pit, trying to get that back into the mine plan later this year.

Excellent.

Thank you, Stephen.

So with regards to guidance for the year, obviously, as everyone knows and hearing the TRX story, we're able to build mills and capacity relative to the market, extremely cheaply, Mike. Like, I don't see anybody able to put up a 2,000 tonne per day plant. If we look at all of the costs of that, including our expansions, it's less $20 million. It's more around $16 million, $17 million. We challenge people to go and see where else that has been done for because I haven't seen anything less than $50 million, $60 million, $70 million for a similar type of asset in other parts of the world.

And I think we had studies suggesting as well. So this has been very capital efficient to your point.

Yes. Exactly. So we're going to be doing that as the third mill expansion. The production guidance for the year is going to be 25,000 to 30,000 ounces. That's not the run rate of the 2,000 tonne per day plant. That's a 1,000 tonne per day plant operating for over the majority of the year and then the 2,000 tonne per day plant coming online, so the 2,000 tonne per day plant is higher than that guidance. Cash costs will come in at $800 to $900 an ounce as of next year. And, again, we expect that to probably be a little bit lower when the full plant comes online as a run rate.

Well, I might just make a couple of comments on that, Stephen. I mean, we talked about power and being connected to a grid, a substation that's substantially closer to site, so expect some benefit that way. But importantly, we expect to receive significant economies of scale from a larger plant. We've been telling investors this for quite some time. We don't need to expand the workforce substantially to grow from a 1,000 to 2,000 tonnes a day. So inevitably, things like your processing cost per tonne and your cash cost per ounce come down because you're able to use the existing workforce to produce twice the output.

Yes, exactly. So the numbers that we're presenting here are blended numbers between 1,000 tonne and 2,000 tonne today.

And I may just make one final comment. You touched on our mantra, our pay as you go mantra. And we explained how to the extent there had been unexpected variances to the downside like no motor breakdowns or power connectivity issues, it can go the other way as well. If the team is able to exceed some of the targets and guidance figures that we've put on the slide here, we move up some of that capital expenditure and try and bring that plant online ahead of time.

Yes. When we look at the models, it makes sense to do that.

Yes. 100%.

100% So it really makes sense to do that. So again, our business plan is pretty simple. Produce gold, pay for exploration to drilling, pay for additional capital programs, and enhance our social license as we do that over time. That's the goal that we have. In 2023 we're able to do it and I'm hopeful that in 2024 we're able to do it again and thereafter. So mindful ESG, when I say ESG, we are good corporate citizens. I've always said this that a mine has a lot of inputs in mining, construction and capital costs and things of that nature. Thus, as you can see in our operating cost plus capital would be over 50% of the revenue because you got to put your capital expenditures in there too. And the biggest beneficiaries of that should be local people. We're able to do that and we're a 100% Tanzanian on site and we procure as much as we can in Tanzania and they are great workers and have done a good job in building out our assets. That helps to reduce local social risk, we also have our traditional miners in this area around Buckreef, that is not abnormal for Tanzania or Africa, and we work with them and we reinvest into schools and into health facilities. We have to -- it may call a joint venture partner and overall goal is to have a much more clean, smooth and efficient operation as a result of utilizing as much local content as possible and adhering to the highest corporate governance as possible as well.

Stephen, if I may. I mean, it substantially reduces our supply chain risk as well.

Yes, it does. And inflation risk as well, which you're seeing in the Western world. So with regards to news flow upcoming, the mill expansion is underway. We will have a updated study or at least modeling of the Buckreef Gold Main Zone. So everything we've been talking about around production is Main Zone only. We have metallurgical geotechnical studies underway currently that will feed into that and then we need to give to market a much better sense of where this Main Zone can go and what our business plan is around increasing resources to have much longer life project here at Buckreef. With regards to share price over the last year or so, our share price relative to market participants I believe has held up decently well. We're in a cash position of $7.6 million as of August 31, 2023. As of today we're a little bit above that. So we've been maintaining our liquidity profile in this environment and we're covered by 3 brokerages out of United States. I believe some of them are on this call and will be asking questions. So all in all, I'd like to see a higher share price. Everybody always likes to see a higher share price. Tough market conditions, I think we're weathering the storm fairly well, but ultimately we do want to make sure that we get to a higher share price over time. We believe that we can do that by driving the current business plan, may take time because we're on a pay as you go program, it could move up or can move back a little bit. And now I'd like to hand it back to Christina and the operator, for any questions. As you can see from our slide and a lot of participants would have seen this slide, always a lot of activity happening at Buckreef.

Thank you, Stephen.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Heiko Ihle with H.C. Wainwright.

In your press release, you state and quote, lower cash costs are expected in the second half of year once the ramp up is complete and the processing plant achieves a steady state. Can you maybe quantify the lower cash costs that you think we might see? I assume there is some sort of modeling you've done. And then also just conceptually, would it be fair to take the first half of the year at the higher end, the $900 mark of your range, and then assume the second half will be closer to the lower end of the range, or is the delta even bigger in a way that the first half is over the $900 and the second half below the $800?

Mike?

Yes. I mean, we've obviously not guided to that level of detail, but -- yes, Heiko. But inevitably as I mentioned, we expect to realize economies of scale as we move towards 2,000 tonnes a day. So certainly expect Q4 to be amongst the lowest cost quarter once the 2,000 tonne a day plant hits its steady state capacity. But I think the way you're thinking about it is right. The front-end of the year will be towards the higher end of the range, and the back end of the year towards the lower end, and certainly average out over the course of the year.

Okay. In your internal model, the 2,000 tonne day processing plant, when do you think that will become cash flow positive on a monthly basis? Is there any sort of modeling that's been done?

Q4.

But monthly?

When you say monthly, Heiko, you mean, is it cash flow positive on a monthly basis?

Which month is more money coming out than going in?

I'd say the start of Q4 is the expectation if it comes online in Q3. So in our case, that's probably June.

Yes. So, Heiko, the way this is working and -- it's always operating cash flow positive. It's significantly operating cash flow positive. It's just that operating cash flow is being reinvested into CapEx to build it out. And so it will -- once the new plant comes online, obviously, we're moving -- we're using all operating cash flow to bring this plant on as quickly as possible or predominantly most of it.

So it'll be -- based on the current schedule, it'll be built and commissioned and sort of ramping up over the course of Q3 and then fully operational towards the start of Q4 at which point it starts generating excess cash.

The next question is from Jake Sekelsky with Alliance Global Partners.

Just building on Heiko's question a bit in the ramp to 2,000 tonnes a day. Are you able to touch on the anticipated grade profile at the higher levels of throughput? I mean is it going to be similar to what we've seen over the last year or so? Any color there would be helpful.

Do you want to comment on what the grade profile at the strip?

Yes. So Jake as we get to 2,000 tonnes a day, you'll see a little bit pull back on the grade. There's two reasons for that. Obviously we are fast-tracking the high grade so that we can build the plant. As a result of that we end up with a medium to lower grade stockpile which is available for us to process. Of course, we might be incurring the mining costs on that because it's already mined. So we expect to see some pullback on the grade in the final quarter.

And then just looking out over the medium-term, looking at additional expansions beyond the 2,000 tonne a day plant, do you expect to continue to scale gradually like you have been? Or do you think you might try and step up to call it, the 100,000 ounce a year range in a single expansion scenario?

So that's -- we're prepared to do it both ways, as long as it makes valuation sense from a shareholder perspective. So, right now, as I mentioned, the cost of us able to build these plants has been very good. We are aware where to get plants that can get us there quicker. And so then it comes down to a financing question around the capital requirements for that versus the pay as you go program and the ability of bringing in external sources of financing such as bank finance, project finance, those sort of things would need to be procured if you were to go a lot quicker. But certainly, I think we're going to look at that and we're going to go in the most shareholder-accretive fashion. Our goal is, is to have the highest NAV per share that we can, the highest EBITDA per share, those type of metrics and to do an evaluation for the expansion project and we're currently going under that looking at some of that analysis now, Jake, and it will be done in that fashion. But certainly, that option will be fully on the table if it makes sense for shareholders.

And then just timing for that. I mean, it sounds like you're looking at both options now. Is that something we might see news on in the first quarter or towards the middle of next year?

I would suspect that's going to be more towards the middle of next year looking at that. And just because, we put a particular type of scenario into the market, we always adjust if it makes sense. So it can change over that particular period of time and we're getting now as we get a good feel of the asset and it's taken us a while to do that. The -- now that we have a really good feel of the asset, we should be able to get sort of any pivots into the market a lot quicker.

The next question is from Mike Niehuser with ROTH MKM.

I just want to congratulate you on your discipline, Stephen, since you've come on and particularly over the last year how almost the operating cash flow equals your investment. It's pretty clear that you're keeping to putting all the money back into the project and really pushing it out in all directions it appears. So, most of my questions were answered on either your presentation or the other analysts, but if I could just throw out -- kind of re-ask in a general way to get a little bit more comment, I would appreciate it if you don't mind. One thing you mentioned was the gold price and cost in Tanzania. From a U.S., North America perspective, how do you look at the benefit of working in Tanzania from an operating cost basis?

Yes. I would say, look, we have this debate a lot between -- well, I guess the market does between what is a Tier 1 jurisdiction? And I look at Tanzania in the case of the social infrastructure is in place. So what does that mean? It means that you get qualified people to run and operate your business and they have good experience in mining -- world class mining operations elsewhere particularly throughout Africa and come back home. So the educational system is in place before that. Also the skilled labor is in place to build tanks and plinths and electrical works and all that. And so that's very important as well in building out an operation. There's lots of contract miners. Remember, we haven't bought a fleet to do our mining here. We’ve 100% contract mining. And then you have the cost profile of just what labor cost in Tanzania versus elsewhere. What electricity cost? Obviously fuel is a world product versus a local product. And so you have to excel, you're a cost taker on that front. So I would say in our experience we've had a very positive experience in operating in Tanzania versus some of the risks that you have in the supposed Tier 1 jurisdictions of cost overruns, labor disputes. A lot of assets in North America have been picked over. So you get into operational issues too on recovery rates and things of that nature. So, with regards to operating in Tanzania, it's been nothing but a positive experience. A lot of the noise that you do hear from a Tanzanian perspective is at the national government level on Dodoma. So I kind of separate what's in the press versus the actual operating experience on the ground a little bit because we manage the Dodoma atmosphere quite well. And that's easier to manage than the operational aspects of things on the ground. So on the ground, it's been very good. At the Dodoma level too, it's been extremely good. Thus far, it's been a good experience. Does that answer?

Illustrated with one very good example, Mike. The reference is made to the old power line being somewhat unreliable. We approached the regional commissioner. The mining commission said, hey like it's just not working for us as well, as we look like. And in no short order, we were put onto another power line which is extended just a matter of a few kilometers. And now as of November, we've been having substantially better power reliability.

Yes. TANESCO built that line. They built that line. And we didn't pay for that line.

Yes. But again, the ability to work with the government was very much there.

They want to see this be a big, big producer at the end of the day. Lots of royalties, lots of jobs and economic activity around it. That's our goal, like ours.

Yes, and Stephen, the other way to think of things is as we continue to work in Tanzania, so it's consistently de-risking the project.

Well, that's a very complete answer. It made me want to follow-up. I think that -- isn't the -- I was curious with your comment of also about going underground and I'm not really familiar with Buzwagi, but I think that was shutting down. And is that an underground mine or an open pit? And could you talk about your timing with going underground and how that's going to impact culture at least on an operating level?

Yes. So it's a good question, Mike. Look at the end of the day, we are talking about Buckreef Main Zone right now. So I fully expect my gut feel and I'm pretty confident in it is this will be underground Buckreef Main with pits and satellite pits all over the target. And so that will be ultimately where it is, hopefully forms out. Obviously, there's some exploration and drilling to do that because, I personally don't like having people go and dig up the earth where there's no gold and lots of projects do that so it does need to be drilled. And so ultimately that is the case. And Buckreef Main, as you're familiar, it is a vertical deposit. It is quite wide, so you're not going to take a lot of dilution on mining of that. It won't make sense to go underground. I like underground, it reduces your footprint on surface and it's easier to manage things like security risk when you're underground versus being an open pit environment. So over time, I think the project gets de-risked more by going underground than staying open pit. And tailings too have environmental factors as well. It needs backfill, all happens with underground.

Well, I imagine this year as you say, you're still a 100% focused on mining Buckreef Main. But by the end of the year with you coming on with the additional ball mill in the last quarter, you're probably going to be really leaning heavily into making sure there's enough mine development from either Buckreef Main underground to the South or these other pits, to make sure that it's fed and with more growth in mine. I know it's too early to say, but how do you see prioritizing the resource development outside of Buckreef Main?

Mike, I can quickly answer…

Well, actually, I think the question goes into -- so the priority right now is expansion. Taking that cash flow expansion into a robust exploration program, which Andrew has delineated, the targets of where we believe to be most prospective around the property. Did I get that right?

You got that right. And, again, Mike, you look at the slide that we have, the Anfield Zone is only about 200 to 250 meters to the East of our Main Zone. Very early stages, we've got some spectacular grades results there. If you remember, just over 3 meters at 14 grams a tonne. That's sitting in a much broader zone of mineralization as well. But this -- you ask your priorities, you obviously go for the most attractive results to start off with.

I missed the last sentence you said.

You go up to the most attractive results and that's why I put them up there, Mike, is Eastern Porphyry and Anfield, our main focus and then the South extensions of the main pit.

Excellent. So really, for the dense analyst like myself, and it'll become more apparent as we move through the year that the priorities will naturally emerge. Well, that's pretty much the questions I had. I just wanted to say one more thing about Jim Sinclair to add is that his involvement in Tanzania back to Sutton, really was making him, not just Mr. Gold, but Mr. Tanzania in terms of bringing exploration to this part of the country, and I'm sure he was very pleased with your activities in the last year and probably, they are well priced on it. But I'll stop there and thanks for taking my questions.

The next question is from Craig Sutherland with Conceptual Solutions Limited.

Majority of the questions I had have already been answered. But first and foremost, congratulations on the progress. It's really been amazing to see how much you guys have fast-tracked this in a way that we were all hoping for. But I guess the question that I had was, our focus is on the Buckreef Main, but also now looking out into future possibilities, like you said, with the Anfield and the Eastern Porphyry, are you identifying anything beyond gold in your drilling or what you're looking for such as silver, copper? Are there any other possibilities that would increase the value of the property or not change the scope but enhance the scope as we go forward, do the geologicals and the rest?

Yes. So currently, what we're seeing is in our doré bars, there's only a small portion of silver here because you do pick that up in the processing and there's a small little amount of copper. We're not seeing anything in the assay results that would indicate that this could be a copper gold project for instance. It's just not that type of geological formation. Andrew, do you want to get into that just a little bit deeper, please?

Yes. No, we're in an Archaean greenstone system. It's predominantly gold. I'm assuming you summarized it. There's a little bit of silver that comes with it, but this is a gold play.

Yes. It's a gold play. And in the region, it's almost all gold plays as well.

The next question is from [Steven Reiser with Assembly Office].

Firstly, I do want to congratulate the team on the strong effort for 2023 in terms of the cleaning up the balance sheet, increasing production, the exploration work, and of course, the very strong stewardship of shareholder capital and funds. That's clearly evident from the discussion. The question I wanted to ask the team is really centered on market positioning and customer acquisition, a little bit of the softer issues in an environment where there really is tightened liquidity in the gold market industry and many miners that are competing for capital. From an asset manager standpoint, as you all will readily be aware, there will be some natural wariness to investing in Africa, particularly for U.S. asset manager or hedge fund or family office, when there are miners like, for example, Snowline Gold or Hercules Mining in Vancouver and in Idaho, for example, that have high intrinsic potential ounces, and are in regions that might be perceived as easier to work within. So I wanted to understand what the team is doing on: One, in addition to the rhetorical discussions in past on Africa and that it's safe and one can drive the car successfully, what might be going on from a more structural standpoint to see reports or information published, even put on the website that cast aside some of these concerns about Africa and Tanzania? And then secondarily and related point, what's being done in terms of acquiring additional investors? I know that 15% institutional slice and the 15% friends, family, and officer slice have been fairly steady for a while. But given the intrinsic value of this firm, there is value in very strong programs to acquire additional investors and customers. So again, market positioning and then structural things to overcome perceptions that may exist about Tanzania and Africa and also the active cultivation of really deep pocket investors.

So with regards to the first risk around Tanzania, there's been a lot of progress at the government level towards foreign direct investment. As you're fully aware of the former President Magufuli passed away just over 2 years ago, the new President is all about foreign direct investment. We've discussed -- where the government is going on foreign direct investment and where it wants to go and how Tanzania is improving as an investment jurisdiction, you're seeing it in the funds flows. I think we've had that in presentations before around the investments that Barrick is making. There was just recently, acquisition of OreCorp by Silvercorp, and we're starting to see a lot more investment in the infrastructure of Tanzania. You are correct. There's not a lot of that on our website. And as we've spoken before, we need to get that onto our website a lot of the positive articles that are around Tanzania. I think in my conversations and the team's conversations with investors, that's starting to come through, with regards to see a reduced risk in the current administration in Tanzania versus the prior administration and that is starting to resonate a little bit. I think you will see that come out in ratings around such as the Fraser Institute and other ratings over time. Kind of similar to the road -- the analogy that I like to use is Ecuador, 10 years ago, not a lot of investment. Today, kind of put up there with other jurisdictions. With regards to the acquisition of -- basically, what you're asking is new shareholders. When we go through the shareholder register, I do see a turnover in shareholders and new shareholders. I even see it -- and I just go down the screen here today and look at the…

Yes. It does. And certainly, we're going to be grateful and look forward for further fact-based insights on the site that dispel some of the perceptions that might exist for particularly Western asset managers about Tanzania and Africa.

Yes. And look, it's helpful too, Steve, that you have acquisitions of mining properties starting to occur in Tanzania as well. That means that there are larger sources of capital that aren't afraid to make investments there. To your core property, the envisioned CapEx for that is $0.5 billion. So that's going to be a large equity check there written by somebody.

The next question is from John Tumazos with John Tumazos Very Independent Research.

Your press release is probably succinct and may simplify. Is the 1,000 tonne a day ball mill installation all that is necessary for the expansion where excess mine capacity exists and excess capacity exists in other parts of the process plant, flotation cells, et cetera, and tailings capacity exists or are there other parts of the expansion underway too?

Yes. So there's other parts of the expansion underway as well. So the crushing circuit is being expanded first. And so that equipment should arrive onshore this month and then be going to Buckreef, so that's jaw crushers and things of that nature. The plinths need to be built for the ball mill that should be built this month as well. There's electrical opponents that need to come in as a result of the expansion and that's going to come online in the new year. Capacity does need to be expanded. We have a plan for that as well, that'll be locally done. And with regards to tailings, we do need -- and I have told lots of our participants that after about 2 years, we do need a longer term tailings plan. We are in a process of doing that, putting that together, looking at a lot of dry stack options whether it's through dry stack tailings in filter presses. We're also looking at thickeners and all those sort of type of processes as we speak to put that in place over time. But we can also expand our wet tailings facility if so desired in that period of time as well. So, rightfully, your question is right. I think we got all the components to that on mining. We can maintain current mining rates to achieve our output. We did a lot of mining last year and in our prior MD&A said that opened up the deposit for the medium-term and that is the case.

And just a point of clarity there, John, we don't have a flotation cellular this time.

In terms of regional exploration, could you talk about what your drilling programs might be in 2025 and 2026 as the cash flow comes in from the production or other uses of funds that may be priorities?

I will let Andrew talk. The regional program will develop over time, but…

Certainly -- maybe if I could ask us to go back maybe, Stephen, just to the one slide of exploration.

Yes. Give me a second. Just, we have to go on the Q&A. I can't…

You can even scroll on the bottom there. Just go to one of the arrows.

And there we go. There we go.

John, it's a bit easier with this slide to talk about it. As you can see, the Main Zone with all the colors there in the center is very clear. Just to the immediate East of that, all those white dots. So far we understand there's 3 zones over 3 kilometers anchored in the Northeast with the Eastern Porphyry deposit which is still open to the Northeast and in the South by an intermittent mining operation by some locals under the Chinese group. There is so little drilling in that, but there's so much opportunity that we have to test. Outside of that, you can see some additional red arrows. I'll start off with the East. We've identified another trend just off to the East side, you can see that red set of arrows. You'll notice also that it's on the same trend as both the Eastern Porphyry, Anfield and the Main Zone. And similarly, if I then take your eye over to the extreme West or the left, again we've identified through field work an additional 2 trends there. So '25 to '26, there's no shortage of targets to go and drill on that. Broadly in the region as you'd expect and I always like to use the phrase John, we obviously keep a track of who's who in the zoo around us. And as opportunities arise there, and so there may be some further activity.

Yes. A lot of guys have approached us too. So, like, when I think through this and as I said, this business plan will develop more fully over time is once the processing plant is up and running, is there a hub and spoke model that can be had here? Because there's a lot of high grade smaller type of pits and when you think about successful companies have done that, Calibre is one that comes to mind in Nicaragua. So, it's a human capital constraint at this point in time, but certainly, that we need to focus on the processing plant, first; what's on our property, second; and then go out look to how that all integrates into the region.

Yes. We have new drivers too. We have mostly been receiving, John, inbounds, which we assess, both locally and within Eastern Africa.

If I can ask one more? As gold rises above $2,000, probably other projects advance in Tanzania, the graphite industry is also active in East Africa, are there shortages of skilled labor or any inputs to production?

Yes. So on that -- on the inputs, we've been good thus far. On skilled labor where I think there is some and I think this is a global thing versus just a Tanzanian thing. There is a lack of highly skilled mining engineers, and that's more of a global shortage than it is a Tanzanian shortage and we supplement our mining engineer skill set with professional services firms and individuals and supplement that with site. But with regards to the other disciplines around metallurgists and geologists, we haven't seen a shortage in that skill set or a shortage of skilled labor in Tanzania to execute. I would say there's excess supply of those skills in Tanzania but the one that is shortage and that's global is mining engineers.

Yes. I think you said also, John, we have been able to attract key people and we also have a very modest turnover.

Yes.

So we've been able to retain very well, as such we wish to retain.

Yes. And I think, when you're in a growing project it's easier to attract and retain people as well. So as long as we continue to grow and pay people well, then we should be okay in that regard on the HR side.

I was just going to hand it over to you, Stephen, for questions in writing.

Yes.

No. We don't have any text questions, Mike. Just Q&A maybe.

There are. You just need to click on the text column in the Q&A.

Yes. Can people see the questions or should we read them out?

No. They cannot see them.

Okay. So Stephen maybe you can read the question.

Yes. I'll read the question. So, we have from private investor and I think this comes -- I get asked this question all the time and it's a question from the past. Is there a realistic possibility to get future dividends paid in physical gold? Right now in the short- to medium-term, I would say that, that is not something that we are looking at. As you're aware, the Tanzanian government does put a royalty on gold. It does track its gold fairly closely and we have a joint venture partner in the Government of Tanzania through STAMICO. So I don't see a dividend in short- to medium-term in physical gold. The second question from the individual is based on the grade exploration numbers the Board presented, would you agree with my personal opinion that there's a high possibility TRX Gold has about 5 million to 10 million ounces of gold under the ground? So obviously we are traded on the public markets. That would be a personal opinion versus a fact-based opinion at this point in time. We do need to do a lot of work on the exploration potential of this property to drill that out to 5 million to 10 million ounces. Personally, I'm hopeful, that that property will come to that sort of level. Andrew is hopeful that the property will come into that sort of level, but it does need to be proven out through the drill bit.

That's correct, Stephen. It's very much a personal opinion. I would say again, we've had very positive early results. And there is no shortage of exploration potential on our special mining license.

Exactly. But it does need to be proven out.

There's a lot of drilling to be done but that's the name of the game.

That's the name of the game. Yes. So the next question is when do you expect to bring out an updated indicated and inferred resources report? How would you describe? Okay. So two questions there. So with regards to updated indicated and inferred resources report, what we are doing is looking at what is the economic potential of the Buckreef Main Zone? And as part of that, there would be an update on resources that are currently in the Buckreef Main Zone. Did I get that correct, Andrew?

Yes.

So that is expected to come out in the first half of fiscal 2024, by June.

Yes. Sorry, calendar.

Calendar, yes. So not fiscal. Yes. Sorry. Calendar. Yes. So the next question to that is, how would you describe the current relationship with the Tanzanian government since there were rumors some rumors of the old aggressive Tanzanian President not being so friendly to foreign investors. And I think we did it in [Steve Reiser's] question, we did answer this. The current relationship is good. We have a good relationship with the mining minister and the old mining minister as well who's now the Vice Prime Minister. We have a good relationship with the permitting secretary. We have a good relationship with the mining commission and with our joint venture partner. Reality is in countries in Africa, if you put an asset in production, you continue to grow it, you become a good taxpayer, become a good employer, have a good reputation. You generally have a good relationship with the government. They want to see the asset grow just as much as we would and that's in, what I'll say aggressive regimes and more not so aggressive regimes. And you're right, the old president was not as friendly to foreign investors. When we started, I came on Board with the old president in power and as soon as we started to build the asset, that relationship was fine. So, I think that I've often said this to people is when you go into foreign countries, and I've been to a lot of them, and I've done business in a lot of them, particularly my prior role of managing government relationships both on the government side and on the investor side, the world is open. And so what does that mean? Everybody has a smartphone. Everybody has an Internet connection. Everybody has access to the same information, which wasn't the case 30 years ago. And so in that and then a lot of the people now are very mobile and are educated in the same educational institutions, particularly in the West. As long as you have a fair, open, and transparent relationship, generally, you have a good relationship, an asset approach that we've been taking.

Well, I think, you know, you talked about foreign direct investment, Stephen. It's fairly well publicized but one of the key metrics that the new government has put into place is growing mining as a percentage of GDP.

That's correct.

And they put in some targets and numbers around that. So certainly a new regime and Stephen’s point, we're getting along well. And as long as we continue to execute, don't expect that to change.

And so the next question is when and how are shareholders going to be rewarded? So markets go up, markets go down, markets sometimes are good, markets are sometimes bad. And what's within our control is not so much what the markets are, what the market value companies at, it is what's in control of us is to reach out to as many investors as possible, put forward a story to as many investors as possible, but also come up to a business plan that is investable and a business plan that could survive those ups and downs from market perception, I think we've managed to do that. That was one of my -- and I was asked this a lot over the last couple of weeks is why did you go with the business plan you went with? And a lot of people don't realize, but a large part of my education is in economics. There is the full realization that interest rates could never be at zero forever. They never were in the history of mankind. And when interest rates go up, generally, valuations go down. It's a pretty simple equation. Liquidity usually dries up as well and the ability to access capital usually dries up with it. And so you need to have in place a business plan that will survive those ups and downs. And in the junior explorer, I could tell you, when I joined, the business plan would not have survived this market. Today, the business plan does survive this market. It's predominantly a self-funding operation. We wanted to slow it down and build up liquidity we could. We don't see that as being necessary at this point in time, but the business plan can survive this type of market. And over time as…

There are no further questions at this time. So, I'll hand it back to you for your concluding remarks.

Yes. Thank you. So, as everyone has heard from us, we are a growth company. We've grown quite well in 2023. We're hopeful that, that growth continues into 2024 and stay tuned for a lot of news to come. I think 2024 will have a lot more news than 2023. We have a lot underway. We have the plant expansion. We have the formation of the business plan for the Buckreef Main Zone and we will then start to really turn the drill bit, and that will produce a lot of exploration results. As I said, I like to be flexible. The management team really likes to be flexible. What was presented today is the current business plan for 2024. But if a new one and better one emerges, there will be a pivot. And so we will always want to make sure that we keep shareholder value in mind and attempt to minimize dilution as much as possible. And I thank everybody on today's call for being a shareholder and sticking with us. Thank you.

This concludes the meeting. You may disconnect. Thank you for participating, and have a pleasant day.

Thank you.