Good morning. My name is Virgil, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Ingersoll Rand Second Quarter 2018 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. Zac Nagle, Vice President of Investor Relations, you may begin your conference.

Thanks, operator. Good morning, and thank you for joining us for Ingersoll Rand's second quarter 2018 earnings conference call. This call is being webcast on our website at ingersollrand.com, where you'll find the accompanying presentation. We are also recording and archiving this call on our website. Please go to Slide 2. Statements made in today's call that are not historical facts are considered forward-looking statements and are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of federal securities law. Please see our SEC filings for a description of some of the factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from anticipated results. This presentation also includes non-GAAP measures, which are explained in the financial tables attached to our news release. The participants on today's call are Mike Lamach, Chairman and CEO; and Sue Carter, Senior Vice President and CFO. With that, please go to Slide 3, and I'll turn it over to Mike. Mike?

Thanks, Zac, and thanks to everyone for joining us on the call today. Please go to Slide 3. I'd like to begin with a brief review of the fundamental elements of our business strategy that drives long-term value creation for shareholders. This is often a helpful starting point for those of you listening, who may be less familiar with the company. First, our global business strategy is at the nexus of environmental sustainability and impact. The world is continuing to urbanize while becoming warmer and more resource-constrained as time passes. We excel at delivering energy efficiency and reducing greenhouse gas emissions, reducing food and other waste of perishable goods and generating productivity for our customers, all enabled by digital and other exponential technologies. Our business portfolio positioning creates a platform for the company to consistently grow above average global economic conditions, aided by the strong secular tailwinds that I've outlined. Second, our business operating system is designed to excel at delivering strong top line growth, incremental margins and free cash flow. Our business operating system underpins everything we do and enables us to consistently generate powerful free cash flow, which, when combined with our dynamic capital allocation strategy, drives strong returns for shareholders over the long term. And finally, over the years, we've built an experienced management team and a high-performance winning culture, which gives me confidence in our ability to deliver strong results that are sustainable for the long run. Having a strong winning culture takes years to build and cultivate, and I believe this is one of the things that the market may underappreciate about Ingersoll Rand. As we consistently execute our strategy, we continue to build a stronger company that delivers reliable and consistent financial performance for shareholders over the long term. Moving to Slide 4. Midway…

Thank you, Mike. Please go to Slide #7. As Mike highlighted, strong momentum from the first quarter continued through Q2. Revenue growth in both our Climate and Industrial segments is outpacing our initial guidance expectations. Margins and leverage are improving and the pull-through to EPS growth has been strong. As we look forward to the second half the year, we continue to see good opportunities for growth broadly across our end markets. We expect sustained strong execution of our business operating system to enable us to deliver financial results that meaningfully exceed our initial full year guidance for revenues, earnings per share and free cash flow. Looking at our second quarter results in more detail. Bookings and revenue performance were both strong, with robust growth in virtually every major product category and geography and in both services and equipment. We delivered record Enterprise bookings and revenues with organic bookings up 15% and organic revenues, up 9%. Climate led the way with organic bookings and revenues up 17% and 9%, respectively. Industrial organic bookings and revenue were also strong, up 8% and 9%, respectively. After-market growth outpaced equipment growth, up 12% and 11%, respectively, as we continue to focus on building out a greater mix of high-margin, sustainable revenue and margin streams over time. There's been a fair amount of discussion on the street recently regarding the impact of customers' pre-buying inventory ahead of announced price increases or the anticipated implementation of tariffs, so we wanted to spend a moment addressing this question with respect to Ingersoll Rand. While it is difficult to determine a precise number due to a number of factors, we are confident this was not a substantial factor for us in the second quarter given our channel structure, and the visibility that we do have. We would…

Thanks, Sue. Please go to Slide 19. We believe the company is extremely well positioned to deliver strong shareholder returns over the next several years. Our strategy is firmly tied to attractive end markets that are healthy and growing profitably. Our products and services portfolio is at the nexus of global energy efficiency and sustainability megatrends, which provides a tailwind for growth above average economic conditions over the long term. So unless you believe the world is getting less populated, cooler and less resource-constrained these secular megatrends will continue to create growth opportunities for Ingersoll Rand. We have experienced management and a high-performing team culture that incorporates Operational Excellence into everything we do. Culture is so fundamental to a company's success, yet it is often underappreciated in the short term. For us, it is a sustainable competitive advantage that we invest in heavily to cultivate and maintain. And lastly, our business model generates powerful cash flow, and we are committed to dynamic and balanced deployment of capital. We have a strong track record of deploying excess cash to shareholders over the years. And with that, Sue and I will be happy to take your questions. Operator?

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Steven Winoker from UBS.

Impressive performance for sure. I just wanted to come back to the -- a couple of things. One is, I guess, the order pull forward and the second one is on Climate margins. On the order pull forward from Q3, could you give us a little more color around that, and how we should expect that to materialize over kind of time frame? And do you think this is just a 1 quarter phenomenon? Or do you think there's going to be a little bit more of this? Just anything on that front would be helpful.

Yes. Steve, so half of it would have been really in commercial HVAC and then a small portion would have been residential, a very small balance being TK for the most part. So that would total something in the $80 million range. What I'd say to you is that, and I don't necessarily talk about sort of third quarter, but I will say we looked at what was happening with bookings in the first few weeks of July very carefully, and they came in very strong. So I don't think that there's going to be an issue there for us with any hiccups in the quarter.

Okay. That's helpful. And then on all the puts and takes around the Climate margin performance, can you give us a little more color there, too, in terms -- I know you walked through some of the price cost inflation dynamics, but -- and tariff impact and all these other items. But maybe just a sense for investment, inflation, the pricing is already out there, just something to help us think about that flat margin performance in the go-forward.

Yes, I think -- sure, I think for the full year '18, Steve, the best way to think about that, the headline would be that I'd expect Climate margins to improve, say, 10, 20 basis points overall. And the pricing has been loaded in. And the productivity is something that, across the company, I always talk about the health of the pipeline. We look to make sure that 125% of what we need is in the Q. The calendarized version or the part of the perpetuity pipeline that is being worked comes down to a monthly and quarterly view. And that monthly and quarterly view would support the productivity side. So I would say with bookings where they are and the health of the end markets, with pricing, the effectivity of pricing being good, what I mean by that is the pace at which price was received and to the extent we were able to get the price that we were looking for, it's as good as I've seen. And the productivity calendarization looks good. When you net that all it out, I think you end up with 10, 20 basis point improvement for the full year implying a pretty good back half.

All right, that's helpful. And I could just sneak one more in, on the Trane-Mitsubishi JV that launched, what kind of financial impact are you thinking about on that as you move forward?

2018, it's not necessarily that material to the company. And -- but the early days has been -- it's been excellent, it's been exciting and the teams are off to a great start. They're active in the market and it's performing as we would have hoped. So all systems are go and positive on that front.

Your next question comes from the line of Steve Tusa from JPMorgan.

Yes, can you hear me now?

Got you.

Great. Sorry, yes -- I don't think I was on mute. So guidance implies some slowing in the Industrial margin expansion after really strong, obviously, results here. Anything going on there? Is there a mix impact or anything like that in the second half?

Actually, we think Industrial remains strong. Everything is pointing forward. We're looking at probably a 2-year high now in terms of Industrial productivity. We're seeing strength across the world. We're seeing services grow at about the rate of equipment. So no, I think, for the most part, we see sort of steady as she goes in Industrial.

And any reason why price/cost would be -- why would price/cost decelerate in second half if kind of these price increases are going through? Is the inflation just that much worse in the second half?

Well, you've got a little bit of that first $50 billion in tariffs coming through in July and August, on those 2. So I think that the safe view of that, at this point, would be the original guidance we have, which is a flat back half. We saw great price effectivity in the second quarter. It was beyond what we thought, but I think we need to pace ourselves based on the changes that happened with tariffs, and the dates of implementation and how those lists might change. But we think that we're managing it really effectively and that we've got a plan and contingencies around how to manage changes that we would get on the tariff front. By the way, it's not just tariffs, it's inflation. We really have a region-for-region strategy. And so if you think about the impact we're seeing, it's not so much on the actual tariff, it's on the derivative effect of commodities in the region increasing because they can as a result of tariffs.

Got it. One last quick one on resi. What do you think the market -- I mean, Lennox was up 9, Carrier was mid-single digits. So it's -- the market is kind of all over the place a little bit here. What do you think the market is going to kind of shake out after the second quarter for resi?

Yes, I think the market data was released already, Steve, so we grew share in the quarter. We know that. And If you look across the board, and I know you'd love the detail on this, but let me just tell you that on the Climate segment itself, when you think about the revenue growth rate for the segment, we didn't have more than 1 point of variance globally across HVAC or transport or residential. So it was a really good uniform performance. And then North America specifically, when you look at applied unitary and service, everything there was, say, 15%, 16% plus growth. And so that was really strong across the whole range which probably tells you what you're asking, I think, at that point.

Your next question comes from the line of Jeffrey Sprague from Vertical Research.

Mike, just a little bit more color on price. I think earlier in the year, there was a lot of optimism you could get it in the U.S. but a lot of doubt or certainly less certainty about rest of the world. Your results here do suggest that price is moving up pretty nicely now in those markets, but could you give a little bit more color on kind of the geographic differences around price? And if you're maybe still playing a bit more catch up outside of the U.S.?

There is not a lot of variability around price effectivity around the globe for us at this point, Jeff. And that's part of, if you will, the surprise here. So the margin improvement in China is going really well, and that would've been the points we would have been talking about a couple of quarters ago. But that's going really well and there's not enough differentiation globally to really kind of point out here in that space. Now I mean clearly, we are covering and have been covering material inflation in every business, with the exception of our global commercial HVAC business, and what we're seeing there is that, that gap is flattening and improving with the increases that have been put out in the marketplace.

And how about capacity, Mike? In a good news result in a year like this, I would assume you're sweating the assets a little harder than you thought. Any material change in investment or anything that you need to do to keep up with this?

Jeff, we're ready to build and ship more, so send us orders and we'll get it to you. Yes, no, it's a good time, and we need to make hay when the sun's shine. We all understand that and that's what's happening. So we don't have any capacity issues at this point in time.

I'm sorry, just one other quick one, maybe Sue has calculated this number. But if you're at price/cost parity, how much margin pressure, just arithmetically, does that create?

I'm not sure I -- I'm not sure I understand.

Well, revenues will be higher because of price but profits not up because you're neutralizing cost with price. So there's an arithmetic margin headwind. If you haven't done the math or you don't know it, that's fine. Just curious.

Yes, I haven't done the math. But what I would say, Jeff, is when we think about this through the entire P&L is we're not just working off of that equation, we're working off of all the different elements. And so as we point out to you on productivity, we're continuing to put productivity projects into the pipeline because there are other elements that are inflationary and moving around in the P&L, too. So we can certainly come back to you on that answer. But my general overall answer is, I'm going to manage everything that is on the P&L to get to the guidance that we've provided and that we're going to hit for 2018.

Jeff, a good example here is that it's one of the better gross productivity years, if not the best, in terms of the absolute dollars that we've ever had. So although the bridge shows that to be flat, that's absorbing 20 basis points of freight in that equation, as an example, that would haven't been planned, which will show up a bit in price. So this stuff, to Sue's point, is moving around between price and productivity, and it improves in the back half of the year. But to get to the arithmetic math -- the arithmetic equation there, we'll follow up with you.

Your next question comes from the line of Andrew Kaplowitz from Citigroup.

Mike, obviously your intention in China has been to accelerate growth through moving to the direct sales model, and you did mention that one of the highlights of your overall growth this quarter is China HVAC. Can you give us a little bit more perspective on the growth in the region, maybe how much of it is coming from your own initiative here versus what the HVAC market is doing over there?

Yes. The market is growing something in the 5% range, so we're growing in multiples of the market there. And it's in the areas that we would expect, which is the applied systems and some of the larger infrastructure projects and in some of the geographies that we weren't covering as deeply as in the past. So that is a strategy, that's what's being executed. It's being executed very well, and the margin profile and linkage to service continues to improve. So it's been a great success. It's probably one of the greatest successes we've had in the past year or so has been that whole strategy, and I would continue -- I would expect that to continue.

Got it. And you don't adjust and tweak that strategy given all of the tariff stuff that's going on between us and China, correct?

Well same equation in China applies here. We build about 95% of what we sell in China in China and the supply chain is localized. So yes, it's the same equation as we have here region-in-region.

Got it. And then -- look, you delivered almost 9% organic revenue growth across the first half of '18. You mentioned the 15% bookings tailwind, maybe a little bit of pull forward as you talked about, but it's not affecting 3Q. So the implied organic growth for the second half, let's call it 6% to 7%, is that just conservatism at the midpoint? Or is there anything that you would worry could slow down the second half? Or is it just sort of steady as she goes?

Well, some of the bigger growers in the quarter would have been applied and it would have been compression technologies equipment. So in essence, we're building to 2019 as we speak. And I would say a lot of that is our view toward building a profile for '19.

Your next question comes from Julian Mitchell from Barclays.

Just wanted to circle back on the Industrial segment, if you could give any color within compressors, any specific markets or regions that you thought gave the orders a particular lift? And also on the Industrial segment in general, following up on an earlier question, I mean, the margin guide implies sort of flat margins, I think, sequentially in the second half, which is quite unusual in Industrial, particularly given the sales trends. So I don't know if there is any extra color you could give on why that's the case?

Yes, in terms of the market, we called out Asia specifically, and that's true, it was really across all of the oil-free technologies, which would be centrifugal and oil-free rotary combined, but also strength in some of the quick ship or the quick book and turn business, short-cycle compressors were strong as well. Service growth across the board is really stepping up. That team has done an outstanding job of taking the operating system for sales excellence and really putting that into how they manage for daily improvement. And so the coverage of the market, the activity we're seeing through that coverage in the market is much stronger than we've seen in the past. Well, that's part of the playbook that we actually stole from the HVAC China business, if you will, in terms of how we're thinking about covering the market more fully and differently there. So -- but North America was good. It was strong as well. We saw that in Contact Cooled, it's a technology. We see that implant there. Centrifugal sort of going into general industry, that's been good as well.

Understood. And then just on the margins sort of half-on-half in Industrial. Is there anything particularly weighing on that, that back half in terms of higher investments? Or at this point, you think you've raised the margin guide enough for now, and we'll just see how Q3 plays out?

No. We wouldn't do that, if we thought it was better we'd rolled that through, but that's the roll-off we've got at this point in time, and [ certainly ] that's going to be a combination of mix and timing of projects. So I think it's a good forecast where we think the year is going to end at this point.

Your next question comes from the line of Joe Ritchie from Goldman Sachs.

Maybe just to clarify Jeff's question from earlier, when you guys made the comment around margin parity -- price/cost parity in the second half of the year, you were talking about margins, not on a dollar basis, right?

Somewhat margins, right.

Yes.

Absolutely.

Okay. Got it, got it. Yes, I think that, that probably clarifies it. Maybe talking about the growth that you're seeing specifically on Climate and into 2019, Mike, can you provide maybe some color on some of the orders that you're booking that could potentially be longer cycle that could start benefiting '19 as well?

Yes. I mean, we're seeing, again, there's very little variability between unitary, applied, controls and service. It's just a strong healthy global environment for us, really all regions of the world. There were no large performance contracts in there and something that would skew the results. That's really important to know. So because you're seeing such strength in applied, you're generally finding longer lead projects. And so if anything there, again, you're building quarter 1, quarter 2 of '19 backlog, which we're already well into that based on customer timing.

Cool. That's good to hear. And then I guess my follow-up there is really just price/cost is better than we expected this quarter. I was just wondering, did you benefit at all from like the pullback that we started to see in copper? And then what are kind of like your assumptions for the key commodities into the second half of the year?

Well, really, it's the best price effectivity I've seen in 33 years of going through this, both in the urgency to get it done and in the ability to maximize what it was that we were asking for. So the combination of that got us a bit ahead of the curve, which is great, further along than we thought we'd be in Q2. And then the ability to absorb the first $50 billion into the pricing that we put out in the marketplace would be the success there. As it relates to copper specifically, we ladder and hedge, and so yes, it's great that things are moving down. But as you kind of enter quarter 3 and the back half of the year, a smaller percentage of the spend is really in the spot market, we begin to lock that in. So if it continues, we'll see some benefit, but that would be reflected in the locks that we would be doing going into 2019 at this point.

Yes. I think that's right, Joe. When we think about that, the goal that I would have is to get ourselves to the point where, in 2019, that, that blended rate gets through our locks and that sort of dollar cost averaging that we're doing on a copper buy comes down overall. So we never lock, as we've told you, to the full amount of the commodity, 75% at the beginning of a quarter. So we do get some benefits on any purchase that we're going to make from those prices coming down. But I would look at that as more of an opportunity for 2019 as we go forward. So it's always good because we are always buying all 3 of the commodities. So we'll certainly take advantage of any price drops that we get.

Your next question comes from the line of Nigel Coe from Wolfe Research.

Obviously, you've covered a lot of ground here, and you've provided good details, so I haven't got a huge amount here, but I'm actually pretty paranoid about the sustainability of the strength and obviously 15% growth is not going to sustain. But as you look beyond July and look at the front logs, RFP activity, customer conversations, what do you think you see in the next 6 months or so? Are we still looking at a double-digit type order cadence here? I mean, any cause of concern? Any color there would be very helpful.

Yes, I mean, globally, as we tracked proposal activity, and we look at what's happening in the market, Nigel, things are strong all over the world for us. And it fundamentally comes down to, in most parts of the world, it's a replacement business, 80%, 85% of most -- what we're seeing in North America, Europe, for sure, and the Middle East is going to be replacement business, and even China. And some of the newer economies are 50/50 in terms of replacement/new construction. And so what's happening is when you can build an equation that has economic value and a payback related to energy productivity, energy efficiency. And if we're able to couple that with a story that helps customers achieve their greenhouse gas emission or sustainability goals, there is a demand creation opportunity out there that's really not factored into how people might look at particular put-in-place or market data across the globe. So it truly is a secular tailwind tied to this whole nexus of energy efficiency and sustainability. And I think that, that's a long-lived phenomenon. You heard me in my opening and close that really relates to the fact that I think as you see more urbanization, you see more pressure on energy and the environment and you think about what businesses we're in, where HVAC is such a major contributor to building efficiency and to greenhouse gas emissions, followed by transport and refrigeration, followed by industrial processes, we're in the right businesses to have an impact. And so I think that's a big part of it. The product portfolio, the investments in controls and digital, the investments in the channel really just go to support that model that we think is the right model.

That's great color. And then just on the service trends, we don't typically see service grow in high single digits. And I know that a lot of that is due to your internal initiatives around connectivity, et cetera. And just obviously a lot of investments there as well. But is there any signal here that's -- we've seen utilization picking up particularly on the Industrial side? And is there some sense here that we've got some aged equipment out there which will require [ more and more ] activity and then perhaps that could signal further activity on OE side?

Well, I mean, services was actually mid-teens. And it's so unusual to see when equipment grows mid-teens, you've got services growing mid-teens. But it really comes down to the whole sales excellence work being conducted across the company and that bearing fruit really over time. And even parts of the world, historically, places like China where I can imagine in the next 3 to 5 years you seeing the same sorts of linkage parity that you're finding in Western Europe and in the U.S. And so that is certainly impacting service growth. Rental is another one. We think that's an important part of the strategy to be able to backstop customers' uptime requirements as well as an opportunity to provide seasonal equipment and to create service opportunities through the rental business, and so that's helping us in that regard as well. As far as Industrial -- you might want to just ask us the second part of your question, the point you were interested in, I think it was industrial productivity?

Just -- no, more on the industrial compressors, whether we're seeing increased utilization of those machines driving service or is this more internal IR?

Well, you're definitely seeing utilization rates across most of the economies in the world increasing up to critical points where you are finding expansion opportunities. So to me, what's really happening in the Compression Technologies business is the market coverage we're taking on and the investments we're making in covering the service opportunities in the markets has taken on a whole different sense of urgency. That connectivity strategy that Todd talked about for really a couple of years at this point in time is something that's showing up in the results in a meaningful way.

And then it's a quick one, Mike, on mix in residential. 1 or 2 of your competitors talked about a slight negative mix in U.S. resi, did you see that at all in your business?

No. Not at all. Simple answer, no.

Your next question comes from Rich Kwas from Wells Fargo.

Mike, on the performance contracting project. So nothing this quarter. Earlier in the year, you said some things could hit, but at this point, is it fair to say that's all going to come in '19?

No. I think that we could see Q3, Q4. I think these are -- sort of landing gear is down on a couple of these. So I think that quarter 3, quarter 4 would be my guess.

And would those have some sort of mix down impact on -- and be enough to have a mix -- negative mix impact on Climate on the margin side?

No, no, it wouldn't. The contribution there is going to be just fine. In gross margins, you'll see a little bit, but the contributions will be accretive.

And institutional orders consistent with overall Climate orders growth organic-wise?

Yes. I mean, really you're seeing applied, which I would link to Institutional growing at the same rate as unitary, growing at the same rate as service.

Okay. And then two, just a question on M&A contribution. Earlier in the year, you had $0.05 or $0.06 from deals done in '17 in terms of the EPS contribution for '18 and then something like $0.15, $0.16 for '19. Are those numbers coming in better?

Well, so what you did see, as we look at the M&A activity that has impacted cash flow in the first half, so $286 million. That is the announcement that -- or the committed transactions, the ICS Cool Energy as well as Mitsubishi that we had committed at year-end. But I think one of the things that I would do, Rich, just as you think about this is, I'll step you back to almost a capital allocation and sort of broaden out your question, which, as we think about capital allocation, we think about investing in the business, first, having a strong dividend, second, and then having the remainder split off between M&A and share buyback if the stock is trading below its intrinsic value. If you look at the first half of the 2018 and I follow that along, so we've got heavier CapEx in 2018 related to some of the footprint optimization as well as the new product development that I talked about in the prepared remarks. So that's actually $163 million. We've got the dividends that we talked about of $222 million. We've also got the share buyback of $500 million and the M&A of $286 million. So in the first half of the year, we've actually deployed over $1 billion of the excess cash that we've got. And so M&A is a part of it. We're going to continue to look at the pipeline, but I just wanted to take the opportunity to point out how strong the capital allocation has really been in the first half.

Rich, specifically on the deals done, they're integrating well, and we're achieving what we thought we would achieve, which had a high threshold. So I don't think any changes with the guidance we gave you around '18 and '19 around contribution.

Your next question comes from the line of Steve Volkmann from Jefferies.

Maybe a couple quick philosophical things, if I could. First, on Thermo King. Based on the data we see, it doesn't really look like the fleets of trucks and trailers are actually growing that much, which would suggest that what we're seeing here is kind of a technology upgrade, and I know there's much better energy efficiency with the more recent units. But how long do you think that can last? I mean, where are we in the process of upgrading the fleet, do you think?

Well, I mean, from a U.S. perspective first, you've got tight shipping capacity, you've got regulatory changes, you've got the impact from U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, immediate expensing, all that's going to drive some opportunity. You are right, I mean, technology is a major difference. If you think about what's going across the road in a refrigerated trailer, really any Class A tractor, the need to manage the diesel engine and reduce fuel consumption to manage the refrigeration cycle, the energy and any greenhouse gas emissions coming off those units and to supplement that with auxiliary power units when the vehicles are idling, it's a big opportunity that I think continues for a long period of time. I mean, ultimately like you're seeing with vehicles -- consumer vehicles, you're going to see more electrification of that over time. And that certainly, what we're doing now with some of the hybrid applications as well as the telematics investments that we've made across the portfolio.

Okay. That's helpful. And then even maybe a little more broad picture. At some point, I suppose all these price increases, we should start to worry about some demand destruction in certain end markets. And some of the pricing we're hearing, especially in the HVAC, is pretty impressive. And I guess I'm just curious how you think about when that starts to crimp growth or maybe it doesn't, I don't know, maybe these markets are consolidated enough now. But I'm curious how you think about that and how you might even sort of a measure and monitor it.

Well history would say that it doesn't happen, that there isn't a destruction over time. And so I rely a lot on history, and I would also rely on a lot of the discipline that happens within the industries themselves. And so the structure of the industry is something we do look at, but we're not seeing any changes to historical patterns here.

Our next question comes from Joel Tiss from BMO.

I just had 1 or 2 little ones. Can you break out the bookings in Industrial by the different product lines just because there's been a couple of questions around the edges of that? I think that would just clear a lot of things up.

Joel, Club Car was the weakest, just marginally negative and the strongest would have been CTS and material handling, albeit material handling being a smaller business. But CTS would have been additive, Club Car would have been dilutive and power and fluid management right in the hunt there. So that's the rundown there.

So you won't give us numbers. All right. And then -- and can you talk a little bit about...

I probably gave you enough of the algebra there that a smart guy like you, Joel, can handle that.

Once I run out of fingers, I'm done. And can you just give us a little sense on the second half share repurchases that are baked into the guidance? And also, are there any larger acquisitions that, over the next 18 months, like you can fuzz it up a little bit, but just a little color on anything bigger that might be percolating?

Well, let me do the second part first, Sue can tell you about share buyback. But on the first part, nothing has changed with regard to our methodology, the discipline about how we're thinking about M&A. I think about 80% of what we look at in M&A are assets that we know and think fit the portfolio. 20% are always a good idea that come in from additional sources that get evaluated to see if we're missing something or there's a fit. So nothing has changed there with regard to how we look at the pipeline, how we manage it, how we think about it strategically or how we compare that to other alternatives, including share buyback. And Sue, you may want to comment on share buyback?

Yes, on the share buyback, the way that we modeled this, Joel, for purposes of the guidance is absolutely consistent with where we started out the year. So we put a placeholder in for $500 million, which, as you know, we've completed. But that isn't the capital allocation strategy. The capital allocation strategy says we're looking to deploy the excess cash and that we're going to look at the M&A pipeline as well as more share buyback to absolutely finish out the capital deployment for the year. So the model today with the guidance is consistent with where we started out the year with the $500 million.

Your next question comes from Deane Dray from RBC Capital Markets.

This is Andrew Krill on for Deane. So going back to the trucking and freight shortage and issues, I think, one of your competitors noted they had a pretty -- a meaningful impact in June for resi HVAC. So I just wanted -- did you guys see any of that? And can you just update us on how the costs in freight and shipping are tracking year-over-year? I think you said around 15% up previously?

No, I said actually refrigerated freight mile is up about 30%, which is great for our TK business, and we were seeing dry freight, at that time, up in the market about 15%. I didn't actually say what our rate increases were. I did say earlier on the call though that there's a 20 basis point impact in the productivity/other inflation bridge that we've got. So if you take that bridge, which shows flat, there's a 20 basis point headwind associated with freight in that number. So that's the impact that we're seeing. And by the way, a lot of the [indiscernible] -- Andrew, and lot of the productivity initiatives, not a lot, but a number of productivity initiatives in the third and fourth quarter are looking at ideas that we've got around freight and warehousing. And so that's sort of an exciting thing that we're thinking about. We started that about a year ago. It's a bit fortunate, if you will, that we've got that kind of teed in for the Q3, Q4 this year, so that should help with that equation dramatically.

Got it. And then on the resi, did you have any impact on just shortage of being able to ship resi units in this quarter or maybe in 3Q so far?

No. We'll ship all you want. Again, send us your orders. We're happy to do that, and we've got no problem building them and shipping them.

Got it. And then just as a quick follow-up on the [indiscernible] China HVAC strategic just -- with all the tariffs and, say, [ rounds ] in U.S. and China, have you seen any kind of blowback against the U.S. brands in general? Or is the value proposition still that they really don't care at this point?

Well, we employ a lot of people in China. We've got factories and technology and product built for the market. And so in China, we think of ourselves as a Chinese company. In the U.S., we think about ourselves about -- as a U.S. company. Fundamentally we're a global company, and we've got to act that way in the markets that we serve. So to your question specifically, no. We haven't seen any reaction to that one way or the other.

Your next question comes from David Raso from Evercore ISI.

On the organic sales guidance increase, the 3.25% to 7.5%, how much of that was higher price than you previously assumed?

I have to think about that. There really was a second price increase which would have happened, depending on the business, kind of midway through the year. So we wouldn't have had a lot in there for -- meaningfully on this. Certainly, it would have looked at material inflation and news around freight, 232 and 301, and we're trying to get on top of that as it was happening. So David, we'd probably have to come back and answer that. But it's not something meaningfully popping out on the bridge to say that, that is such a difference that -- from where we were originally.

No. Because -- David, the way that I would think about that is with the pricing and generally your -- again your pricing realization in the neighborhood of 1% to 2% is going to kind of flow through. So it might move the growth slightly, but it's not going to be the biggest factor in changing the growth. It's really coming out of the volume that's occurring out of the end markets as opposed to pricing or FX or acquisitions, which basically are having about the same impact as the original guidance.

David, I'd probably say maybe 1 point to 120 basis points for the full year would be price. Everything else is going to be pretty well volume.

So that's not all new pricing from the previous guidance, right? That's full year, what you had said?

That's all. That's right.

I mean, the reason I ask is when you look at the segments, and I don't know if it's conservatism or, as you said, a lot of the inflation is in Climate, but you just raised your revenue guidance for Climate $475 million, but you only raised the EBIT $46 million, right? So basically a 9.7% incremental profit on the incremental sales you're now looking for. And that sort of begs the question, are we really saying price versus cost maintains the margin? Or price of $100 offsets cost of $100? So just to be clear, we're saying price/cost does not erode the margin the rest of the year, especially in Climate? Or is it, no, it's $100 of cost get offset by $100 of price and yes, that does dampen the margin, but at least we're offsetting it in dollar terms? Just the incremental margin on Climate just seems low on what you just raised the sales by.

But I'm thinking out loud, David, as we go through this. But I think what you have to do with all of this is you can't just parse out a couple of pieces. And it really is important to understand that the majority of the big inflationary items are occurring in the Climate segment of the business and that as we're looking at the Climate segment itself over the second quarter, you're actually seeing an improvement in the overall margins for the quarter. So we're offsetting the headwinds and continuing to improve margins in the business.

David, I guess, our math is a little bit different, too, by the way. I mean, to get to a 10, 20 basis point expansion in Climate for the full year, we're going to have to get something like 50, 60 basis points of improvement in the back half of the year. That implied leverage organically of somewhere between, let's say, 23% and 25%. So we'll [indiscernible]

Is the incremental margin year-over-year -- it is 23%, but I'm talking about literally what you just raised in sales and EBIT. What you would think there was incremental -- that's why I asked the pricing question. If it was simple like I raised revenue in Climate by, you name it, the $475 million but half of it was price and all I'm doing is offsetting cost, then I can appreciate why the incremental profit on that sale is modest, right? We're just trying to understand is there conservatism in that number? Or when you look at Industrial, that same math on the way you raised the sales $114 million, you are dropping through 36% more profits. So is the messaging here that, yes, the inflation is in Climate, that price/cost might be a drag on margin, but we're more than making up for it in Industrial, and thus the whole company has price/cost, no margin drag. It seems that you're trying to figure out.

High level, David, I'd say that, and Sue said, the 232s and 301s really hit the Climate segment much more, if not almost exclusively, with the Industrial business. And so to my mind, you've got more headwind there to offset. There is more price in the back half obviously than there would be in the first half. You've got direct material inflation, which continues in the second half to be a bit larger than the first half. But sure enough, the math for the mid -- showing up -- shoring up the math to the raise, we can work with you later on and kind of compare notes.

There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the call over to Zac Nagle for closing comments.

Great, I'd like to thank everyone for joining for today's call. And wanted to let you know that we'll all -- we'll be around for questions today, tomorrow, this next week and the coming weeks, and we look forward to seeing you on the road in the coming weeks as well. Thank you.

This concludes today's call, and you may now disconnect.