Good afternoon. My name is Denise, and I will be your conference facilitator. I would like to welcome everyone to the Cara Therapeutics’ Second Quarter 2022 Financial Results and Update Conference Call. All lines have been placed on-mute to avoid any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that this call is being recorded. At this time, I would now like to introduce Iris Francesconi, Chief Strategy Officer and Head of Investor Relations from Cara Therapeutics. Ms. Francesconi, you may begin your call.

Thank you, Denise, and good afternoon. Just after market closed today, we issued a press release detailing our corporate progress and financial results for the second quarter 2022. The press release can be found on our website at www.caratherapeutics.com. You may also listen to a live webcast and replay of today's call on the Investors section of the website. Participating in today's call are Chris Posner, Cara's President and Chief Executive Officer; Rick Makara, Cara's Interim Chief Financial Officer; and Dr. Joana Goncalves, Cara's Chief Medical Officer. Before we begin, let me remind you that statements made on today's call regarding matters that are not historical facts are Forward-Looking Statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Examples of these Forward-Looking Statements include statements concerning the Company’s ability to successfully commercialize KORSUVA injection and Kapruvia, risks that KORSUVA injection and Kapruvia revenue, expenses and cost may not be as expected. Planned future regulatory meetings and/or submissions and potential future regulatory approvals; the performance of the Company' commercial partners including Vifor; expected timing of the initiation, enrollment and data readouts from the Company’s planned and ongoing clinical trials; the potential results of ongoing clinical trials, timing of future regulatory and development milestones for the Company’s products candidates; the potential for the Company’s products candidates to be alternatives in therapeutic areas investigated including NP; and the potential for Oral difelikefalin to address additional pruritic indications, the size and growth of the potential markets for pruritus, the Company’s expected cash reach, and the potential impact of COVID-19, geopolitical tensions and macroeconomic conditions on the Company’s clinical development and regulatory timelines and plans. Because such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Risks are described in more fully in Cara Therapeutics' filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the risk factors section of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2021, and its other documents subsequently filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission including its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2022. All Forward-Looking Statements contained in today's call speak only as of the date on which they were made. Cara Therapeutics undertakes no obligation to update such statements to recent events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they were made except as require by law. With this, I will turn it over to Chris.

Thanks, Iris, and good afternoon, everyone. The second quarter was truly foundational for Cara building the base for our continued growth this year and in the years ahead. We made big strides towards our goal of creating a differentiated Company and becoming the world leader in pruritis. Our focus is on treating this distressing underserved condition that affects millions of patients across many diseases. The second quarter showed us we are on the right path with concrete validation of our strategy. Along with our partner Vifor Pharma, we made significant progress in the launch of KORSUVA injection. For the second quarter, we recorded total revenues of 23 million. This consisted of eight million in profit sharing revenue from KORSUVA injection, and 15 million in a milestone payment from the EU approval of Kapruvia via in April. In addition, our strong Phase 2 proof-of-concept data in notalgia paresthetica highlighted the broad potential of our oral difelikefalin platform. I will get more details on our progress this quarter and Rick will follow with a review of our 2Q financial results. After that, we will take your questions. In the first quarter on the market KORSUVA's adoption dynamics are in-line with our expectations and in-line with the only recent branded product launch in the setting. Specifically, independent and midsized dialysis organizations have been the first to adopt and administer KORSUVA injection. The more rapid product adoption by these organizations is predominantly due to A, shorter contract negotiations. B, simpler technical implementation of product information, pricing and reimbursement in respect of EMR systems. And C, faster establishment of treatment protocols. We have heard positive anecdotal feedback from the field on the performance of the product. Week-to-week we have seen an increase in the total number of clinics ordering and we have seen repeat orders…

Thanks Chris. As a reminder, the full financial results for the second quarter of 2022 can be found in our press release issued today after the market closed. Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at June 30, 2022, totaled $204.7 million, compared to $236.8 million at December 31, 2021. The decrease in the balance primarily resulted from $30 million of cash used in operating activities. For the second quarter of 2022 net loss was $4.2 million, or $0.08 per basic diluted share, compared to a net loss of $30.7 million or $0.61 per basic and diluted share for the same period in 2021. Total revenue was $23 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022. There was no revenue during the same period of 2021. Revenue consisted of $15 million of licensing milestone fee revenue related to the milestone payment earned for the approval of Kapruvia by the European Commission in April 2022 and $8 million of collaborative revenue related to the profit sharing revenue from before sales of KORSUVA injection to third-parties. There was no cost of goods sold during the three months ended June 30, 2022 or 2021. As there was no commercial supply revenue for either period. R&D expenses were $19.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022 compared to $25.2 million in the same period of 2021. The lower R&D expenses were principally due to a $10 million milestone earned by Enteris during the three months ended June 30, 2021, partially offset by increases in direct clinical trial costs, and related consulting costs during the three months ended June 30, 2022. G&A expenses were $7.6 million for the three months ending June 30, 2022, compared to $5.7 million in the same period of 2021. The higher G&A expenses were principally due to increases…

Thanks, Rick. With that Rick, Joe and I will be happy to take your questions. So Denise, we can now open the call up for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Daniel Wolle with JPMorgan. Your line is now open.

Hi everyone, congrats on the quarter and thank you for taking our questions. Three questions. First one, can you help us understand the wholesaler number of 1,812 files and how that translates to 16 million in net KORSUVA sales? Second, can you provide us with some color on the cadence of coding establishment or reimbursement establishment at different dollars centers during the quarter and how that might evolve in the following quarters. And last but not least is the leader to that can you qualify for us your remarks regarding the net sales that are mostly due to wholesaler versus end user demand? Thank you.

Yes, Daniel, great hear from you. So let me let me take those one at a time. So the first is around the net sales number. It is about revenue recognition. Essentially, it is a timing thing. So we book revenue, when the wholesaler or sorry when Vifor ships product to the wholesaler. So that is when we recognize revenue. The 1,812 vials are what the clinics order from the wholesaler. So there is two different things in the in the revenue recognition, so that is an important part. And the second question you had was around coding and essentially what we are asking is, are the dialysis organizations ready to provide access to this product, are they set up? And the short answer is yes. On the LDO front, they are ready, the systems are updated. And in fact, as I mentioned, we are actually seeing orders beginning in the third quarter. So we are actually quite optimistic about what we should expect in the months to come.

Right. And last, but not least, if you can quantify for the remark that there mostly what you saw, was wholesalers talking versus end user demand?

Yes. So again, the way we book revenue Daniel is we recognize that when Vifor ships vials to the wholesaler, so that is the 16.8 million in net sales. So what we are also then providing, if you remember, I committed to providing the number of units that the dialysis clinics have actually ordered from the wholesalers as we believe that is a good proxy for end user demand. So that is the 1812 vials. So two different things, so it is not as simple as just multiplying the whack price times the number of vials two different things.

Okay. Got it. Thank you.

You got it.

Thank you [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Chris Howerton with Jefferies. Your line is now open.

Great, thank you so much for taking the questions. I think, I have two. One kind of related to the line of questioning that Daniel had about the wholesaler in the stocking, I guess, how can you - can you give us some more color, I guess, on kind of the expectations, we could have the organic demand from the larger institutions. And I guess if you could comment at all about Fresenius versus DaVita. My assumption would be nice. That Fresenius would be easier to execute on that side, given the relationship with Vifor. And then the second question that I have is related to the NP indication. Just what types of features would you seek to gain alignment with on the FDA regarding, presumably the Phase 3 design? And then as it correlate to that in the past there was discussions about getting a very broad label for oral KORSUVA for just broad anti-pruritic. I'm curious if you are still on-track for that in relation to the different domains of indications? Thank you.

Great Chris. So let me - I will tackle the first one, I will turn to Joe to tackle NP. So let me be crystal clear, I will be crystal clear, I will try to be clear, crystal clear in terms of channel stalking and demand, I'm going to take both of those separately. So channel striking or channel strategy. It is an important part, as you probably know of any launch strategy. And levels are defined in accordance with future demand as projected by Vifor. So Vifor put product into the channel anticipating future demand. That is the channel the strategy and I'm quite pleased with how that progress and that is how we booked the 16.8 million in total sales. And obviously Cara's profit is eight million. But the key is demand and essentially what I'm saying is the future demand is going to be really dependent on the LDOs coming online, and that is exactly what we are seeing that came online just more recently, and we are seeing ordering already. So it is on formulary, we are seeing ordering. I can't comment specifically on the different customers, you mentioned Fresenius and DaVita. I can't comment specifically on those two customers. But I will say that we are quite pleased, I was quite thrilled with the addition of the Fresenius Salesforce to the mix that is additive and complementary to Vifor. So we would fully expect the LDOs, gradually adopting this product and really contributing to the majority of growth moving forward. And you know, Chris it is a very similar pattern, we actually saw with Parsabiv, where the MDOs and mid size and the IDOs with the initial uptake - with more gradual uptake in the LDOs, and then becoming the majority of the growth, and I would expect that same sort of sequence. And that is exactly what we are saying. So in the MP, Joe, if you want to tackle that one.

Thanks, Chris. So with the FDA, we plan to have further discussions about our clinical development program before the end of the year. This year and it would really be focused on what the clinical development program would look like. We know we will need to do some dose finding the discussion will be what that program would look like. Of course, Cara will try to see if we can accelerate, you know the program to include that dose findings as well as validated studies. So we expect that to revolve around typical questions that need to be asked of the FDA for developing a clinical program. As far as the broad label goes for difelikefalin at the board level, we will first tackle the NP pass and then take it from there and give further updates after that meeting.

Okay that is great. that is excellent. Thank you so much for taking the questions and congratulations again.

Thanks Chris.

Thank you. [Operator Instruction] Our next question comes from a Joseph Stringer with Needham & Company. Your line is now open.

Hi thanks for taking our questions. Congrats on the quarter. Can you comment on the initial - the margins from Vifor here coming from net sales down to you know, before the profit loss share is applied, just in terms of what the sort of percentage there and is that in-line with sort of what you would expect going forward in subsequent quarters. And then on the Kapruvia launch, can you kind of walk us through the cadence of when you would expect sales contribution from that as country specific reimbursements come online? Thanks for taking our questions.

Yes, Joe, absolutely. Let me let me give the financial profit sharing to Rick and then I will tackle the Kapruvia one. So Rick.

Yes, thanks for the question, Joe. So we don't provide specific guidance on the profit share calculation. But what I can tell you is that based on the net sales for the quarter, the profit share was within line with our expectations. So we were not surprised by it. If that helps.

Yes, and Joey on Kapruvia, obviously we are quite excited. We got approval in April of this year and we are on-track to launch in several countries in the second half of this year, obviously, with our partner Vifor. So I would anticipate seeing some launch countries come online, in terms of kind of the market development, I would say, Vifor has done a very nice job in terms of developing the market, as they did in the U.S., and they are doing a similar cadence of market development activities outside the U.S. And as countries come online, that is really going to be dependent on reimbursement and their negotiations with the national payer. So I would expect again, a few countries to come online in the second half of this year.

Great. Thank you so much for taking our questions.

Thanks Joey.

Great, thank you. [Operator Instruction] Our next question comes from David Amsellem with Piper Sandler. Your line is now open.

Hey thanks. So I had a near-term focus question and that is about the quarterly sales and profit sharing cadence. So you mentioned Chris, the wholesaler stalking, so I apologize if I missed this, but is it stands to reason then that perhaps the recorded sales and profit share in 3Q might be somewhat softer, or because you are getting buy-in from the largest dialysis organizations that you are going to see Vifor continue to sell into the channel. So just help us understand how we should think about cadence in 3Q and I guess fourth quarter as well? I have a follow-up, thanks.

Let me tackle that one. With any launch, especially the way we record - we record revenue, and obviously Vifor ships to wholesalers and then there is the demand generation. So it is really a matter of timing. So here is what we would expect, we would expect obviously demand to accelerate given that Fresenius and DaVita, the LDOs are really online now. We are on formulary protocols in place, systems updated, and we are already starting to see some ordering at those clinics. And it is a marketplace dominated by really to customers, they account for 75% to 80% of all the dialysis patients. So demand will accelerate, I would fully expect to launch inventory, as mentioned on the call to get drawn down accordingly in the third quarter and into the fourth. But to me, it is really about demand and that is where I'm encouraged, and I'm excited that when you layer on the Fresenius Salesforce coupled with obviously getting on the formulary and getting protocols in place and the staffing train. I'm very optimistic that we are going to experience a good acceleration. And as with most launches, you know between the trade inventory and the end user demand that will reach some sort of steady-state in the next few quarters.

Okay that is helpful and then the follow-up is regarding inventory. Can you just talk about what we should think about in terms of steady-state, how many weeks in the channel is steady-state and is it fair to assume that inventory levels are, you know customarily going to be tightly managed here?

Yes, I would take the latter part of your question. And when I say steady-state inventories, I would say it is more customer, clearly Vifor putting product into the channel with the anticipation rightfully so of demand and that is the channel strategy at launch. And that is exactly what we saw. And that is exactly what they executed. I would exactly as you said, I would see steady-state with inventory at very tight. And where sales, net sales is probably more congruent to end user demand during steady-state.

Got it. Okay, that is helpful. Thank you.

Thanks David.

Thank you [Operator Instruction] Our next question comes from Oren Livnat with H.C. Wainwright. Your line is now open.

Thank you so much. I have a couple. If I could follow-up on the earlier question about margins and obviously, you can't give guidance for Vifor, but we can all do math here. And I think you reported collaboration revenue of 47%, about of net sales, which assuming at the 60% profit split at non Fresenius accounts, I can back into a nearly 80% operating margin for the sale to-date. And I just want to make sure before we get silly and carry numbers like that forward. Should we assume that there maybe are some material costs that were not grossed against those numbers this time around considering was just channel fill from a, I guess, a before accounting perspective, or can we just go ahead and say, wow, this as this drug grows, it is only going to be at least this profitable going forward. And as we start thinking about as we model of revenue, how much we estimate it is close to you. And I have a follow-up.

You got it. well let me give Rick the first question.

Yes. So on the profit share, yes, I mean you did the math, right. And like I said, in when I got the initial question based on net sales of just under $17 million of profit share of $8 million was within what we expected. So that wasn't a surprise for this quarter and going forward. It shouldn't be that much difference.

That is why somebody bought Vifor.

What is that Oren, go ahead.

I said it gets that is why somebody acquired before, because that is a lot of profit.

Yes, it is in the horseshoe ring, as they say Oren, kind of what we call this quarter.

Alright. And you can if you had something else to follow-up on that. And I have another question unrelated.

No, go ahead, go ahead Oren.

Okay. Sorry about that. Just regarding the timing of the large dialysis centers that is coming on board, I mean, I had assumed sort of right out of the gates that Fresenius I guess, would be the most likely earliest indicator or earliest adopter, just given the setup. And it sounds like they are just coming online into the third quarter. I'm wondering if there was any hang up there, because I thought in early May, you talked about having all this sort of reimbursement and pricing data sort of online or in systems, which I assume you mean Fresenius and DaVita as well. So what would be the reason why it would take months to sort of start seeing the first orders coming in from the LBOs?

Yes. So Oren, I would say this, I mean, Vifor has done a really nice job working across the Board with, LDOs, MDOs and IDOs, I mean, this is not sequential. They do this all at the same time. MDOs and IDOs, we fully expect it to come online earlier, just smaller organizations, typical MDO may have 200 clinics. And so what has to transpire is obviously and you probably know this is not to get on formulary, you got protocols in place, get on formulary contracts in place, and then ensure the systems are updated. And the staff is trained, because we are changing the way dialysis is done. So that is a much quicker process in the MDOs and IDOs. On the LDOs, I mean, it took - they are more complex, quite frankly. And they took a little longer, as we expected, versus the MDOs and IDOs. And I wouldn't say there is any hang ups, it is just part of the process. And you are taking like a Fresenius that may have 2,800 clinics, and you are not only getting protocols and contracts in place. You are making sure all the staff is trained, and the systems are updated, so they could order. So that is what I mentioned in my prepared remarks, I'm actually quite pleased that they are able to implement these contracts that quick and given now that the Salesforce of Fresenius is also on board. It provides me and our team here as well as Vifor obviously, with a lot of optimism now since the LDOs are the market essentially.

Alright. Thanks for the clarity. I appreciate it.

You got it Oren.

Great. Thank you very much. [Operator Instructions] Next question comes from Jason Gerberry with Bank of America. Your line is now open.

Hey guys, thanks for taking my questions. I was wondering, if can you talk a little bit about the two large Dos and just the sort of treatment protocol decision-making. Is this sort of a singular, top down decision that permeates all the clinics within the LDO or is the decision making more fragmented just sort of wondering if you can kind of shed a little more light on that dynamic? And then thinking about this the commentary about 3Q with the ordering patterns, I mean, are we talking about sort of small, medium large in terms of this the indication of demand that you are seeing for 3Q? Thanks.

Hey Jason yes certainly. So the protocols, especially if the LDOs are centralized. And then they are pushed down to the individual clinics. So in terms of protocols, I can't speak specifically to protocols on Fresenius, DaVita or any of the MDOs. But what I can tell you is that they are not rate limiters, if a physician identifies an appropriate patient, they get the product. That is the good thing. And I think the other thing I would comment on is why we are so encouraged is that the systems - getting the systems and getting folks trained up across all these clinics is a process. And we are actually seeing that come to fruition and actually with some speed. So we are quite thrilled about what we are seeing in terms of the dynamics and demand generation. When it comes to Q3, as I mentioned before, I mean, given the channel strategy and the launch inventory, we would fully expect that to burn down in Q3 in congruence with the acceleration of demand. And how that looks in Q4, we will have to see a demand transpires. But as you know, right now, you know between us and Vifor, we are not giving any forward-looking guidance around sales and demand.

Got it. Okay, thanks.

You got it Jason.

That was the end, I have no more questions. At this point, I would like to turn it back to Cara management for closing remarks.

Well, thank you, Denise and really thanks, everyone for joining us today and I'm wishing everybody a great week ahead.

Thank you for your participation in today's conference. This concludes the program. You may now disconnect.