Good afternoon, and welcome to the Twilio’s Q3 2019 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Daphne, and I will be your operator for today's call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later we will conduct a question-and-answer session. I will now turn the call over to Andrew Zilli, Vice President of Investor Relations. Mr. Zilli, you may begin.

Thanks, good afternoon everyone, and thank you for joining us for our third quarter fiscal 2019 earnings conference call. Our results press release, SEC filings and a replay of today's call can be found on our IR website at investors.twilio.com. Joining me today are Jeff Lawson, Co-Founder and CEO; George Hu, COO; and Khozema Shipchandler, CFO. As a reminder, some of our commentary today will be in non-GAAP terms. Reconciliations between our GAAP and non-GAAP results and guidance can be found in our earnings press release. Additionally, some of our discussion and responses may contain forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Should any of these materialize or should our assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual company results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements. A description of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions and other factors that could affect our financial results are included in our SEC filings including our most recent report on Form 10-Q, and our remarks during today's discussion should be considered to incorporate this information by reference. Forward-looking statements represent our beliefs and assumptions only as of the date such statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements made during this call to reflect events or circumstances after today or to reflect new information or the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law. With that, I'll hand it over to you, Jeff.

Thanks, Zilli, and welcome everyone to this quarter’s earnings call. Before I begin, I'd like to take a moment to recognize and thank the nearly 5,000 brave firefighters and other first responders doing their best to keep the fires in Sonoma County at Bay protecting the lives, homes, and livelihoods of our neighbors to the north in absolutely horrifying conditions. Thank you, now onto our call. Our third quarter results were strong with total revenue growing 75%, tremendous growth that this scale that reinforces our view that we are still in the early days of this market opportunity. And while we are the leader in the category today, we have much bigger aspirations. We are investing across the business in new products, new regions, and much more to position us for long-term success to take advantage of this fast growing market. We're very confident that the demand environment for our customer engagement platform and the inputs to our business are strong. I recognize that base revenue came in slightly below our guidance and Khozema will go into more detail on that, but that doesn't change our perspective that we've only scratched the surface and are excited about what lies ahead. We continue to help companies reimagine their customer engagement as every company needs to focus on building great digital experiences for their customers. Our commitment to innovation and customer success is driving relationships with companies of all sizes as the breadth of our product offering and our developer first approach position Twilio as the platform of choice for building meaningful relationships with customers. I'm particularly excited about some of the new companies we've started working with in Q3, which George will talk about shortly and nowhere with this developer first approach more evident than at our annual customer event SIGNAL,…

Thanks, Jeff. Our team delivered another strong performance in the third quarter as we continue to build out the go to market foundation for the future for multiple initiatives, expanding our enterprise presence, expanding internationally and building a strong partner community. And these investments are paying off. In fact, during the quarter, we signed new or expansion agreements with more than 50 global 2000 accounts. A great sign of the traction we are seeing in the enterprise. Internationally, we opened an office in Japan hiring a strong executive, Yoshihiro Konno, to lead the region. We continue to see success with our Engage Roadshows, where we bring together a community to learn and develop the future of communications. We're holding Engage events around the world with stops coming to Washington D.C., Toronto, London, Paris and Tel Aviv in the coming weeks. At SIGNAL, we heard from great customers like Netflix, Lyft, Morgan Stanley and others on why they chose Twilio to power their customer engagement. Now let me highlight a few of the exciting deals from the third quarter. We entered into a new relationship this quarter with the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Finance Center, the shared service provider for financial and HR services were approximately 650,000 employees. The USDA is using programmable messaging to authenticate their employees via SMS when they are logging in to review pay stubs, W2s, 401K allocations and more. In addition to onetime password authentication, the National Finance Center will use SMS to periodically send account notifications and reminders to their employees. This is an exciting new relationship with one of the largest departments of the federal government. We also expanded our relationship with Chime, the fastest growing U.S. challenger bank platform focused on helping their members to achieve financial health. To accommodate their incredible…

Thanks, George, and good afternoon everyone. Q3 was another strong quarter for the business. High growth of this scale is a testament to the power of Twilio's platform and showcases how our customers continue to choose Twilio as their trusted customer engagement platform. Now diving into the numbers, base revenue, which includes Twilio SendGrid, grew 79% year-over-year to $276 million in the third quarter. Organic base revenue for Twilio was $227 million growing 47% year-over-year. Twilio SendGrid grew 31% year-over-year to approximately $49 million. As Jeff mentioned, while the growth was very strong, base revenue came in a bit lower than we expected. We've experienced rapid growth and with that come some growing pains. Consequently, a few of our older systems sometimes fall short of where we'd like them to be. We have faced some of these growing pains in the third quarter as we discovered some errors in our billing processes that resulted in a few onetime credits being issued to customers totaling approximately $5 million, which will also impact our ongoing run rate. Importantly, our internal controls identified these errors and we understand the root issues and are working to improve our billing related processes and other systems. We will continue to invest in systems to support our strong growth trajectory into the future. Let me take a moment to discuss our current revenue disclosures and the change we are planning to make. Given the size and scale Twilio has achieved, we believe the variable revenue designation has become less meaningful and that total revenue is a better way to evaluate the overall business. Variable revenue has materially declined as a percentage of the total, 7% this quarter, 7% last quarter and less than 10% in 2018 prior to the closing of the SendGrid acquisition versus 16% in…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Ittai Kidron from Oppenheimer.

Thanks. Hey guys. Khozema I just – Khozema I wanted to really focus on this, the systemic issue of the $5 million credit. Just make sure I understand this. Is this a cumulative effect over multiple quarters that had to be clear in the quarter? Or does this just happen in this quarter itself and hope me get me get my hands around this?

Yes, it's a little bit of both, so thanks for the question. As we said on the call, I think just based on the growth that we've experienced as a company. I think one of the things that we've looked at is that our systems are going through some growing pains as we explained. And this particular issue was related to our billing system where specifically some order forms were input incorrectly in sort of a manual fashion. And obviously this is not the experience that we want for our customers given that customer trust is really paramount. And we went back and did a thorough analysis of the problem. And once we found some of these manual inputs, we promptly issued credits to the customers that were impacted. And there were a couple of them that were in the quarter, there were a couple of them that were preceded a couple quarters. We think we've got a good handle on what caused the errors historically and we've got controls in place now to address this going forward.

So just to make sure as I think about the shift from September actual results to December, the September results already take this credit into effect, fully into effect. And December is now guided with this in mind. So still there is very little quarter-over-quarter growth in your core business from September to December. And I understand that last year you had that onetime the political, the midterms and the onetime large customer. But it seems like business activity or the volume of transaction is still decelerating quite substantially from September to December. Is there anything else in here that you think requires highlighting in understanding this?

Yes, I wouldn't characterize it that way. Let me give you a little bit of the financials and then I'll have Jeff give you a little bit more the detail and George as well maybe from a customer perspective. I think in terms of the December quarter, we did take our guidance down by a bit more than the ongoing run rate. I think we feel like we've got a good handle on the issues and we're certainly actively working to correct them, but I think we felt it was warranted to put it in a little bit of an extra buffer until we're absolutely certain that all the issues are addressed. And we're not necessarily quantifying that, but I think we felt like it was prudent to do so as we work through the fixes that are entailed with that. As it relates to kind of the year-over-year I mean – any way that you look at it really, we feel like that we've got terrific growth at scale that it's really impressive. The comps, as you mentioned, we've signaled for a long time, we're going to be difficult in the back half of the year. You pointed to the political traffic. I think we really read it again for example, that we had kind of a onetime customer that ticked up particularly last year. And I think we've been pretty clear that around our expectations that the growth rate and the expansion rate would slow down a little bit in the back half of the year. Just maintaining these rates is obviously hard at this size. And then again, the credits that we referenced, those impact a little bit our base revenue growth as I explained a moment ago. And we'll have a little bit of an impact on DBNE too. But we still feel great about where the business is headed. And let me turn it over to Jeff maybe to add a little bit more color.

Yes. Hey, Ittai. So, I mean, despite the manual errors, I think we turned in a quarter growing 47% year-over-year organic at nearly a billion dollar run rate. And so, I'm really proud of what we've accomplished. So we're one of the only companies growing at this scale, at this rate. And we're very proud of that. We're focused on the long-term opportunity. This is one of those once in a lifetime changes that's happening and how companies engage their customers using all of these new digital channels and we're here to capitalize on that mega trend. And we're hearing all the right things from our customers about what they need and our ability to provide it. So, I look at it, it's a great market. We've got a great business model. We've got a great team and I see them all getting better as we grow. So I'm really excited about what lies ahead.

Very good. Good luck guys.

Thank you, Ittai.

Your next question comes from the line of Bhavan Suri from William Blair.

Hey guys, thanks for taking my question and thanks for the billings target, Khozema. I guess I did want to touch on the dollar base net expansion rates here, even if we had a few hundred basis points from the credits to billing issue. It feels like it decelerated reasonably quickly. I guess I just like to understand sort of obviously scale matters, but it was 100 basis points or 100 bps or 200 bps. And I’m just trying to understand if you could provide some common dynamics that have effect this metric. I guess, are you seeing changing spending habits within customers? Or was it just the volatility of how applications have launched that drives it up and down the speed of that? I guess just some of that color would be helpful.

Yes. Again, let me provide a little bit of the math and then maybe I'll have George comment from a customer perspective in terms of what he's seeing. But I guess just as a starting point, I would say the short answer is no. Again, maybe just to reiterate, Bhavan, I think from our perspective, I mean the growth at the scale that we've reached is really strong. And I think again, we always knew that we would have pretty difficult comps in the back half of the year. If you recall Q3 2018, we had growth that was approaching 70%. And then going into Q4, we had growth that was approaching 80%. And we had a little bit of political traffic in there that was elevating that. And then we had this onetime customer that we actually tried to back out of the results last year to try to normalize it a little bit. That had an impact as well on the expansion rates back in that period. And so, as we lapped the year, I think we've been pretty clear in our expectations that that DBNE would in fact fade over time in part because of the comps, in part because the business is just becoming a lot larger and we're running into the law of large numbers. And then the footfall in this if you will, this is manual error issue that we elaborate it on as it relates to billing associated credits. And so, you put all that together and that's what kind of results in the map that you saw on the DBNE that we got in the quarter. But I don't think it's anything related to some of the issues that that you pointed to. But let me turn it over to George and he can color on that a bit more.

Sure. Thanks, Khozema. I mean, I would say that we don't see any fundamental change in our demand environment. We still see a lot of interest from customers and we haven't fundamentally seen a shift except for some of the dynamics that Khozema talked about, which are nothing to do with really our customers. We're excited, we're investing and we still plan to capture the big opportunity in front of us.

Okay, helpful. Let me quickly just ask a follow up with Flex here. Obviously, nice wins there. I guess maybe George for you maybe touch on what sort of demographics are you seeing from the early adopters? And then how were the initial conversations going with the VAR channel. This is something you and I have talked about multiple times in the past. Just if I can get color on those two. Thank you.

Yes, great question. So, I mean, in terms of the demographics of the customers, I would say generally speaking, it was consistent with what we said before. It's still a newer product. So we're still mostly in the early adopter phase. We have a lot of interest from kind of digital economy customers and very tech forward companies. We're excited now with Allianz and CompuCom to start to see the beginnings of expanding that more towards the mainstream. But I would caution that this is not the normal pattern. We’ve not yet – we haven't yet crossed the chasm. It's still a newer product. But we're excited about these green shoots. And I think it speaks to the power of the value proposition of the product. In terms of the partners, we're excited about the facts we're seeing there. And, as I've mentioned, I believe in the past, we've not really historically that Twilio had a strong reseller motion or frankly infrastructure for resellers. We've been investing in that this year and are bringing some, some initial resellers onto that platform. We're testing it right now. I think it will be something that we'll be able to onboard more in 2021. I don't think it will be material for a while for us, but we are investing in it. And certainly, I think, Flex is definitely the catalyst that is growing interest in that for us.

Great, thank you guys.

Thanks, Bhavan.

Thanks, Bhavan.

Your next question comes from the line of Mark Murphy from J.P. Morgan.

Yes, thank you. Khozema, the $5 million billing impact to Q3, is it also $5 million in Q4? And I'm just wondering for how many quarters do you think that would continue into 2020?

Yes, thanks for the question, Mark. Good question. I don't think we see it necessarily continuing into 2020 in the way that your question intimated. I mean, obviously, it will impact kind of the way that we evaluate our run rate from an FP&A perspective. But in general, I mean, we feel pretty good about how things look after Q4. We’re obviously not guiding for that today. So, I don't want to get too far down the road on that one. But as it relates to Q4 itself and the way that we characterize our guide, as I said a moment ago, it definitely does have an impact on the ongoing run rate. It's about a full $5 million. I think as you probably understood based on the comments that we gave a moment ago, it is a little bit – we have put a little bit of a buffer, if you will, into the way that we've guided into Q4 just until we have our arms fully around the issue. We just felt like that that was the smart thing to do in terms of the way that we communicated the way that things would play out for investors. And while we feel like we have a good handle on the issue, we do want to get through all the fixes. But it's kind of a onetime thing in nature we feel. We caught it ourselves and we think we're more or less out of the woods, but we want to be smart about the way that we convey it.

Okay, great. And then how many customers will be receiving the credits?

I don't have that number off the top of my head, Mark. It's pretty small. I mean we're talking about a single digit number, so I don't know it off the top of my head, but it's in that realm.

Okay. The other question I had for you, I think we're looking at base revenue growth. If we look at it sequentially, it's around 7% in Q3 and then you're guiding about 9% for Q4. And if we trended that out and just considered how that would look across four quarters, I think it would get us to something like low 30s to mid 30s. And so, I'm just curious, would you view that as a fair assessment of the glide path on the base revenue currently? And maybe how we'd trend it into next year? Or would you look at this and say it's artificially constrained, I guess, again due to the billing errors and what sounds like a little extra cushion for Q4?

Yes. Mark, I'm just not going to comment on anything into 2020. I mean we'll guide it that obviously when we do the Q4 call. I would simply say that in the back half of this year, we have some tough comps as we've signaled previously. We obviously had the political. We had that onetime customer that we've alluded to previously and we've got this billings thing. And so, you're going to have to kind of put that together in your model. But I think we just not in a position to be able to guide out to beyond 2020. I will say is that we feel great about what the results were in the current quarter, 47% organic in spite of the comp, in spite of whatever the self inflicted issues and we feel great about the overall inputs to the business.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Brent Bracelin from Piper Jaffray.

Thank you and good afternoon. One for Khozema and one for Jeff, if I could. Khozema, I wanted to maybe take a little different slice at the – that the slowdown you saw here. If I just look at the top 10 customer contribution versus the revenue outside of the top 10, it looked like the bulk of the slowdown and the fact you had an $11 million sequential decline in revenue at the top 10. But growth outside of the top 10 actually accelerated from about an 84% growth to 85% growth in the quarter. So as you think about the cohort of top 10 customers that did decline, is it safe to assume that that's where some of the bulk of the credits were applied? And maybe could you just talk about net expansion rates looking at this cohort outside the top 10 that actually accelerated in the quarter? Is there broad-based change to net expansion rates? Or do you think some of these top 10 customer decline sequentially or having a bigger impact on just that calculated net expansion rate? And then again, one quick follow-up for Jeff.

Okay, a lot in that. It’s a good question. So just to start off with in terms of the credit itself and where that was placed or the credits. As I said earlier, there were a handful of them, single digits. There were a couple of different customers that would have been in our larger customer base off the top of my head, I don't think they were in the top 10, maybe top 20, but among our larger customers to be sure. In terms of the overall dollar value generated from that top cohort of customers, or in terms of trying pulling that up here, but I think overall that was up actually on a quarter-to-quarter sequential basis. And so, we feel good about obviously the fact that the percentages of total was about flat, which speaks to the concentration of our overall top 10 kind of holding steady or declining as time goes on. But, I think, the premise of the question is incorrect. We'll follow up on the exact map with you offline or in the callbacks, but I don't think that's right.

Got it. I thought it was 18% last quarter, 13% top 10 next this quarter. It was 13 last quarter, 13 this quarter.

That's right, that's right.

Okay and then Jeff, for you getting some questions around RCS. Obviously, we saw four months ago, Google going kind of direct with RCS four months later, when I was in Europe four months later, now you have Verizon, Sprint, AT&T and T-Mobile joining up. I guess the question we're getting from investors here is how should we think about the potential impact of pricing relative to kind of this next gen SMS RCS service, this new consortium? And what that has to do? And what potential impact it could have on the overall business as you think about the next couple of years? Thanks.

Yes, absolutely, Brent. Thanks for the question about RCS. So, first of all, Twilio has supported RCS since early 2018 and we're a strong supporter of RCS as a channel. And just as a reminder, you alluded to this. But think of RCS as an upgrade to SMS, right. So the reach is similar, the economics are similar, but it adds new capabilities that you can do within the message, things like commerce or maps or call to action buttons and more. And this is really exciting because we and the developers building on Twilio can build even more rich experiences inside of the core messaging app that's already on all the Android phones. And so that's really exciting. It opens up new opportunities. Now, the CCMI, the cross carrier messaging initiative that was announced by the four carriers in the United States this week is about building inter-op between those four carriers, which we view will hasten its implementation and its rollout, which is good. So that we and our customers can really start leveraging it because the promise of RCS has been out there for a long time. It's just all been dependent on carriers rolling it out. And when you get the top four carriers in the United States agreeing on rolling it out and how they’re going to do that and inter-operating with each other. That's good. It means that our customers can get the benefit of RCS probably sooner than if the four carriers weren't inter-oping and cooperating on this effort.

Your next question comes from the line of Nikolay Beliov [Bank of America Merrill Lynch].

Hi, thanks for taking my questions. My first question is for both George and Khozema. When you look at the expansion rate and specifically the customer cohorts outside of the top 10, what do you think – are the newer cohorts trending in line with the older cohorts? And part B of my question is, are you happy with the expansion rate of the older cohorts?

Hi. This is George. Yes, for our newer cohorts, I wouldn't say that the expansion rate characteristics of them have changed materially from quarter-over-quarter.

Okay. And I guess a different question for you both. Sales and marketing as a percentage of revenue picked up for the first time about 25% for a while versus historically 20% to 25% of revenues. Is 25% to 30% kind of like the new normal in terms of like sales and marketing spend as you guys overlay a direct sales force?

Yes. This is Khozema. I wouldn't say per se that it's the new normal. I mean I think what we've said for a while is that we feel like that we want to continue making investments in the sales and marketing engine, so long as we believe those investments are efficient. I think the one particular outlier as you look at the Q3 numbers is SIGNAL, which shows up as a large onetime expense and also is a driver for the loss that we took in the quarter. So I think you're comparing a little bit of an apple and an orange there in terms of Q2 to Q3.

Got it. Thank you.

Yes, thanks.

Your next question comes from Alex Zukin with RBC Capital Markets.

Hey guys. Thanks for taking the question. So maybe just on the favorite topic of dollar based net expansion, again. In terms of the guidance for Q4, if we add – and I know this has been asked a little bit, but I'm going to try it a different way. If you add back the credits, you do still see a fairly material drop-off that I think, I mean, by our math, which correct me if I'm wrong, it looks like it's in the very low 120s for Q4. You mentioned both the extra cushion and the bounce back in Q1 in terms of dollar based net expansion and then the anniversarying – completing the anniversarying. So is there any way you can help us just understand kind of which zip code should we be thinking about for a sustainable dollar based net retention? Is it in the 120s? Is it in the one teens? Is it higher than that? Just any help there would be appreciated and then I have quick follow-up.

Yes. I'll give you – this is Khozema. Thanks for the question. I'll give you a little bit of a directional math. We don't guide on DBNE specifically, but I'll try to help you in terms of updates to your model. I think the way to think about it is that, in Q3 and Q4 both, as I mentioned earlier, we had extremely elevated growth rates in Q3 2018 and Q4 2018 and approaching 70% in Q3 and then approaching 80% in Q4. And as a result, you had this onetime political dynamic obviously, which contributed pretty significantly and then you also had this onetime customer that we called out. And so, those impacts are obviously stripped out in the back half of this year in the absence of an election and with that customer behavior having normalized. The second dynamic is that as you pointed out, you do have this credit issue, which also affects a little bit our revenue run rate into Q4 as well. And so, you do have a little bit of a fade in both Q3 and Q4 relative to prior periods in terms of that overall DBNE. And so again, we don't guide on that number specifically. I think you're a little low based on the way that you marked it, but I don't want to provide any real specificity beyond that. As we get into Q1, it becomes a little bit more complicated obviously because you've got a January stub month, and then you've got the anniversary of the SendGrid acquisition, at which point we'll start to fold in that DBNE with our overall DBNE, which just by definition is going to make it come down a little bit. But based on the way that we're currently calculating it, what I will say is that we don't expect that combined rate to come down as much as I'd previously suggested. And again, we're not providing guidance around it for Q4 or out into 2020, but we feel quite good about continued expansion out into 2020.

Got it. And then maybe just a follow-up for Jeff or George on Flex adoption. You signed a nice costumer Allianz. I think you guys have previously talked about this business potentially being a pretty meaningful contributor to overall revenue over the next few years. And I'm just curious how should we think about this business over the next two years from a contribution to revenue perspective on a decent timeframe?

This is George. So, without commenting specifically on like revenue timeframes, I'll let Khozema to take that on. The question adoption, we are excited about the adoption we're seeing of our customers. And I think that obviously people that are interested in buying Flex are obviously talking to our existing customers. And I think that's a sign that we are seeing success with existing customers in the field. And, yes, we're encouraged by certainly these data points kind of continue us on our journey. And like I said, it's a long journey. We're early, but with a huge market opportunity, we think we have a very differentiated value proposition. And yes, we definitely think that this is something that has a potential for the long-term to be meaningful.

In terms of its contribution to revenues, this is Khozema, I think it's in our revenue today obviously. We generate revenue off of the product today and obviously that will continue to grow as time goes on. It's not really a material contributor to revenue yet. We certainly expect it to be over time. I think what I've signaled in the past is that that our expectation is certainly that that would happen over the next several years. And we expect that to be a fairly material number as time goes. But I think in terms of its material contribution to revenue, I wouldn't really anticipate that until really the back end of 2021, maybe 2022. But as George said, we feel great about where things are headed and some of the most recent customer wins.

Perfect, thank you guys.

Thank you.

The next question comes from Heather Bellini with Goldman Sachs.

Hi, this is Dan Church on for Heather Bellini. I just have a quick question. It's been about nine months since the SendGrid acquisition. Any color or commentary you could give us on in terms of how cross-selling initiatives have tracked relative to expectations?

Hey, this is George. Yes, I mean, I think you heard our example of the airline that we closed in Q3. So I would say generally speaking, we're on track. I think we've fully integrated at this point the sales forces and we are going together to existing customers and new customers to cross-sell the products. So, yes, I think I would characterize them as on track.

Helpful, thanks. I think the rest of mine have been asked. Thank you.

The next question comes from the line of Meta Marshall with Morgan Stanley.

Great, thanks. I wanted to refer to kind of the expansion agreement you’ve alluded to in the prepared script. And just to get a sense of timeline of those contracts closed or perhaps more broadly like as you had an applications, what you're seeing around sales cycles when you're not dealing directly with the developer? And then maybe on my second question, gross margins obviously remain very healthy in the quarter. Is there any customer account term we should be kind of thinking of from pricing competition or deals that you kind of walked away from? Thanks.

This is George. So, I would say that in terms of the sales cycles, I think, you asked a good question in the sense that we definitely do see two types of sales cycles. I think the ones where we have a developer self-service start in the account, definitely can be relatively shorter cycles. And in our commercial segment, those can be intra quarter transactions at times, so start and complete within the quarter. As we've said, for example, on the other side of the spectrum, for Flex, which typically is not going to be started by self-service developers start, it's more of a sold product so to speak. We've been saying now that for enterprises, these are going to have longer sales cycles. And I think we're seeing that to be true. They're having, what I would describe, even more normalized enterprise cycles and I think that's frankly to be expected and I think that's totally fine. In terms of – can you remind me the second half of your question again?

Gross margins.

Gross margins, in terms of customer, we haven't seen like a material change in like churn or logo churn, customers leaving from that perspective. So I don't know if Khozema is providing more gross margin color, but that's what we're seeing in the field.

Yes, I mean, as it relates to churn, I think George answered the question. I think the only other thing I would say about gross margins is it's in the zone that we have been signaling for a long time. It's kind of where we expected it to be. The only thing you really call out is that it was clipped by about 60 bps due to the billing issue that we've talked about a lot during the course of this conversation. But otherwise it moves around a little bit within that zone due to a variety of factors and we've talked about this in the past.

Great, thanks.

Your next question comes from the line of Nandan Amladi with Guggenheim Partners.

Hi, thanks for taking my question. So as you merge the basic and variable revenue streams, what maybe the way to think about leading metrics as we head into next year?

Well, I mean, I think maybe just to take a step back for a second. I mean, I think, the reason that – we're doing that in the first place and I think that variable revenue designation has become a lot less meaningful, certainly in terms of the way that we manage the company internally, the way that we run the company. And so, I think, it was a change that we felt like we should make. It was certainly something that I've been thinking about a long time since I joined the company. But kind of wanted to see the way that it would play out this year in terms of that particular metric, it's also declined pretty substantially 7% of revenue now. So, I think, what you'll see from us going forward around growth is simply that total revenue instead of necessarily breaking out base variable. We talked about the fact that we would continue to provide some data around WhatsApp given what a significant percentage of variable revenue that's been in the past. But otherwise I think we feel pretty comfortable around total revenue as the metric. We'll obviously report on things like DBNE and ARPU, et cetera, but otherwise that – that's the suite of metrics that you should expect from us.

Thank you.

The next question comes from the line of Will Power with Baird.

Great. Thanks. Yes, just a couple of follow-up questions. Khozema just come back just quickly to the dollar-based net expansion rate. I guess the one other piece that maybe I missed. I think you have said you pulled the variable revenue into that calculation as well. Is that going to begin in 2020 that you do that? And what's the anticipated impact just in terms of kind of level setting in front of that from again WhatsApp and variable revenue being part of that?

Hi, Will. You mean on DBNE specifically? What's the impact associated with folding and variable as part of the total calc?

Yes.

Yes. I think it's going to be pretty de minimis honestly. I mean, I think, that's one of the many reasons that we've been thinking about doing this for some time. I think you won't see immaterial impact. I mean there could be an impact plus or minus 100 basis points, but I don't really think it will be material and something for you guys to think about.

Okay.

The second part of the question I missed.

Yes, I know that that was it. I just wanted to…

The timing of the change – the timing of – sorry, the timing of the changes, we'll make that change in Q1. And we'll provide you all with a bridge to make sure that you can see the different moving pieces, so that we're not just bringing a number on you guys for the first time. We'll kind of walk it through.

Okay. And then maybe just a question for Jeff or George just the conversations API, it seems like a lot of excitement at SIGNAL from that. I recognize in beta here. But any further color you can provide on early use cases, customer feedback, how you're thinking about the excitement you're seeing? Is that kind of moves into 2020?

Yes, absolutely, Will. This is Jeff. So just a quick background, we launched conversations to help companies to connect better with their customers, right. We have – like we've all got experience. A few years ago, it was kind of novel when you got a text message saying your flight was delayed or your flight was boarding or your package got delivered and that was exciting. And then when you reply to the message, it was like nothing would happen. You get back an automated thing. That said if you need help, call us, like it's not a great experience. And so, what we're seeing the leading companies out there do is say, hey look, obviously there's a lot of alerts and things like that and then you should be able to apply and the companies can route it to the employee, who can best help you, sometimes it's an in-store employee, sometimes it's a contact center employee. It's a variety of workers who instead of like 20 years ago all of these people may have been sitting at desks with a desk phone and now people are out and about. They've got a BYOD device in their pocket and messaging is the preferred medium. And so, really the way consumers connect with the employees of the company has changed and conversations is the product designed to capture that change and enable every company to be able to service their customers in the way that those customers really want to talk to the company. I’ll say that it's brand new product. Obviously, we just announced it at SIGNAL, so it's a beta product. So it’s the very early stages of that product. But I think there's a macro trend here going on. It starts as often happens in the consumer world with how we engage with each other and then bridges into how we want to engage with companies. And like that notion that I want to text with the company is not necessarily new, it’s just in the past, it's been a one way thing for most companies. And with conversations we're trying to answer the call of making that a two way dialogue. And what I'll say is that since we announced the conversations, no pun intended, it's created a lot of conversations with our customers. And so, I think we've struck a nerve there and it's started to peak interest from customers, but it's super early in the life cycle of that product.

Yes, thank you.

And your last question comes from the line of Rich Valera with Needham & Company.

A follow-up question on SendGrid. Doing the math, it seems like it grew just over 30% in the quarter, which is I think a little better than it's been growing recently and well above, I guess, the 25% sort of bar you'd initially set. So I'm just wondering, given that you're still, I think, somewhat early in the cross-sell process, where you think the growth rate for that could go and could we see that sustained at a 30% plus growth rate in next year as you kind of really flesh out the cross-selling initiative?

Yes, Rich. Hi, this is Khozema. In terms of the growth rate for the quarter, it came in at 31%. So your math is right, just about 30%, 31%. We feel pretty good about the growth prospects of the business. I mean, again, we're not going to guide out in the next year, but I think as I've said previously, we would be disappointed I think if the growth rate fell below that. And I think we have a really great shot at it being above that. And so that's kind of in the zone of our expectations. Again, I don't want to provide any like detailed guidance around the number, but our expectations have consistently been somewhere in that range.

That's great and just one follow up, if I could, on the expense side. Should we think of the 4Q expense levels as sort of the run rates for going forward and sort of scale upward from them as we head into next year? Is there anything exceptional in Q4 that we would back out? Or is it sort of a good run rate to serve as a base going into the next year?

Yeah, that's a good question. I mean, I think we're still figuring out what the 2020 plan is going to be, right. So I wouldn't one way or the other read anything into Q4 necessarily. What I will say is this – is that I think the way that we think about it is, is that so long as we see multi-year elevated growth at scale, we certainly see great opportunities to put investable dollars. And so, there is an opportunity for us to continue investing and continue generating great returns for investors. There's nothing onetime per se. But otherwise, we're looking at our investment deck for 2020 as we speak. And those are the kinds of returns that we're expecting is kind of what you saw in the Q3 from us 47% growth organic at scale. And hopefully we can deliver something elevated in the future.

Okay, thank you.

There are no further questions at this time. Thank you for participating in today's conference. You may now disconnect. Good bye.