Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the PNM Resources Third Quarter Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jimmie Blotter, Investor Relations Director. Ma'am, you may begin.

Thank you, Candace, and thank you, everyone, for joining us this morning for the PNM Resources Third Quarter 2014 Earnings Conference Call. Please note that the presentation for this conference call and other supporting documents are available on our website at pnmresources.com. Joining me today are PNM Resources Chairman, President and CEO, Pat Vincent-Collawn; and Chuck Eldred, our CFO as well as several other members of our executive management team. Before I turn the call over to Pat, I need to remind you that some of the information provided this morning should be considered forward-looking statements pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We caution you that all of the forward-looking statements are based upon current expectations and estimates, and that PNM Resources assumes no obligation to update this information. For a detailed discussion of factors affecting PNM Resources' results, please refer to our current and future annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q as well as reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC. And finally, let me say that we are looking forward to seeing everyone in Dallas next week -- week after next, excuse me. With that, I will turn the call over to Pat.

Thank you, Jimmie. Good morning, everyone. It's another beautiful day here in New Mexico and I hope wherever you are, you're also having a beautiful day. We'd also like to wish you a happy Halloween from everyone here at PNM Resources, and I promise, no tricks today, only treats, at least on my portion of the call. We'll begin on Slide 4 with the headlines from the third quarter. We remain on track financially as ongoing earnings for the quarter increased $0.04 over the third quarter in 2013. GAAP earnings were up $0.01 per share compared to the same period. Today, we are affirming our 2014 consolidated ongoing guidance to the range of $1.44 to $1.51 per diluted share. I'm pleased to say that there has been a lot of progress regarding PNM San Juan BART filings. The EPA issued its final approval of the revised state implementation plan for San Juan Generating Station, and the company also reached a settlement agreement with several of the parties involved in the San Juan BART case that was filed with the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission. PNM has filed the proposed stipulation for approval by the commission, and I'll discuss that in more detail in a moment. We turn to Slide 5 and take a look at the individual utilities. In the third quarter, load at PNM was flat from the same period in 2013. Residential load increased for the second quarter in a row, up 1.7% in the third quarter over the third quarter last year. And remember, last quarter it was up 0.5% compared to the second quarter in 2013. We are encouraged by these numbers which could indicate that load is stabilizing, although I think it's still too soon to know definitely. Economic development efforts at the state and…

Thank you, Pat, and good morning to everyone. Let's begin the financial review with the third quarter results, beginning on Slide 9 of the presentation. Third quarter ongoing EPS was $0.68, up $0.04 compared to the third quarter of 2013. TNMP was up $0.02, and both PNM and Corporate and Other were each up $0.01. Corporate and Other benefited from lower interest expense. Now for more detail on PNM and TNMP's drivers on Slide 10. Starting with PNM, we closed on the Delta Generating Station in July of this year. We have renamed this asset, the Rio Bravo Generating Station, and it contributed a $0.01 to the earnings this quarter. We continue to expect this to add $0.02 on an annualized basis for earnings. Palo Verde Unit 3 market prices and nuclear decommissioning trust gains were each up a $0.01 compared to Q3 of 2013. In relation to the BART negotiations for San Juan, last year we made a contribution to the Navajo workforce training initiative that was not repeated this year, this added a $0.01. Higher capital spending resulted in higher depreciation and property taxes this year, bringing earnings down by $0.01. The termination of the Gallup FERC generation contract caused results to be $0.01 lower compared to the third quarter of last year. We continue to expect to be down a total of $0.03 this year compared to last year for Gallup. Weather at PNM was also down $0.02. Cooling degree days were 9% below normal and 5% below Q3 2013. At TNMP, we saw an improvement for the rate relief from the semiannual TCOS filings of $0.01. Load is up $0.01, and we also had a $0.01 from the $1.5 million 2013 Energy Efficiency bonus, which was approved this quarter. After changes in the Energy Efficiency rule in 2008, that allows utilities a bonus for exceeding goals. TNMP has consistently met and exceeded our Energy Efficiency goals. This is the fourth consecutive annual bonus we have received in recognition of these efforts. Offsetting these items is weather, which was down $0.01. Cooling degree days were 3% lower than normal and 4% lower than Q3 2013. Now turning to Slide 11. We are affirming our guidance range of $1.44 to $1.51. TNMP continues to deliver strong results and expected to be at the upper end of the range of $0.43 to $0.45, driven by load growth and TCOS rate recovery. At PNM, we expect to be at the lower end of the range. Fourth quarter load is expected to be seasonally lower. This and the mild weather that we have experienced in October, will temper the fourth quarter results. In total, however, we remain confident that we will end up the year in the middle of the guidance range. And with that, I'll turn it back over to Pat.

Thanks, Chuck. To wrap things up, we are working on the rate case filing for later this year, and we remain focused on successfully completing the important regulatory cases already underway. We are cautiously optimistic about the load numbers and economic activity in New Mexico, although as I mentioned, it's too soon to know if things are stabilizing. In the meantime, we continue to effectively manage the business, and we expect to be at the midpoint of our guidance. Operator, we'll now open it up for any questions.

[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Ali Agha of SunTrust.

Pat, as you mentioned on the load trends at New Mexico, still too early to tell how things are going to play out. But can you remind us for planning purposes, as you budget out the next few years, what kind of load growth assumptions do you bake into your budgeting and planning for New Mexico?

Ali, we haven't given any numbers out past this year 2014, where we expected to have a 2% to 3% down at New Mexico and up in Texas. So when we give guidance on our Analyst Day, we'll give them to you then.

Okay. Fair enough. Okay, I'll come back to that. And then, also, you've got the rate case filing coming up later this year and then the BART settlement set you up for the next rate case or filing in '17, right? Rates in effect '18. Can you give us some sense of what kind of upside or sort of what kind of rate increases roughly we should be thinking about as these rate cases are coming up now?

Ali, this is Chuck. Obviously, we don't want to really get into detailed discussions of our rate case that we haven't filed at this point. And really, given the fact that we intend to discuss the details and the rationale behind our intent for that 2016 rate case at the Analyst Meeting in December, I think it's really best not to get ahead of ourselves in discussions that others might not be informed, particularly staff and others at the commission. So at this point, we're going to not really focus on questions regarding the 2016 rate case until we have a discussion after we filed and the Analyst Meeting in December.

Okay. but if I recall correctly, Chuck, just for the BART settlement alone, I believe in the past you guys have talked about the kind of increases that would go with that. Am I correct?

That's correct, Ali. What we've talked about is the entire price tag for BART is 7%, but that's over 2 rate cases, and it also doesn't include the other things that we would be including in the rate case. And as Chuck said, it's never good to get out in front of your stakeholders in the case, like the staff and the Attorney General and the Commissioner. So we'll file in December, and then when we have our Analyst Day, we'll go through it in excruciating detail.

Understood. Last question. Given that the rate increases are going to be in effect in '16, in New Mexico right now, how much support do you need from load, generally back to kind of earn your authorized retail ROE at this point? Or should we assume there will be lag this year and next, and then you accrue it up in the rate case, is that the way to think about the ROE trend there?

Yes. Ali, I think again, we -- Pat was pretty clear that we feel like we're beginning to see some indications of improvement in load, but we're not at a point yet till we get through the end of the year to really internalize what we think of projections going forward, but it's also evident they were probably getting to the lower end in the bottom of what we think would be the recent trends that we've had over the last couple of years in load. So we'll just kind of wait and see how things go for the fourth quarter this year, and again discuss our views in December at the Analyst Day.

And Ali, you always true up volumes in a rate case. So wherever we end up, we will true up in 2016.

And our next question comes from the line of Brian Russo of Ladenburg Thalmann. Brian J. Russo - Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc., Research Division: Maybe you could just, I know you don't want to give specifics on the 2016 test year rate case, but maybe you could talk more broadly as to what the key components or drivers of the case will be.

Sure. I mean, obviously, as we just discussed, we'll true up volume in the case from wherever we come in. Palo Verde leases also go into half price at that point in time. The 40 megawatts of solar comes in at that point in time.

Yes, we also have the -- as you know, the Palo Verde lease buybacks. We mentioned $160 million that we'll look to purchase 64 megawatts that goes into the rate base in 2016. We'll address fundamentals of the business, depreciation and rate change, the continuation of the renewable rider. We also have a stipulation on the La Luz gas turbine, which is a 40-megawatt peaking station that will be included into 2016 rate case. And everything is really mostly the fundamentals of the business and address load, as Pat pointed out as well. So that's pretty much it, Brian. Brian J. Russo - Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc., Research Division: It seems pretty straightforward. Are you -- I think in the past, you've contemplated, maybe filing for decoupling. Is that still a possibility?

Brian, we're still in the process of taking a look at decoupling, other rate design issues and also the issues around net metering, which you guys are all too familiar with. So those are the rate design issues that we're looking at. And again, we'll have our announcement in December, but we're studying all of those issues. Brian J. Russo - Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc., Research Division: Okay. And I hope -- just -- what's your level of confidence in your weather normalized modeling in the third quarter? Sometimes you see anomalies, one way or the other, just curious what your thoughts are on that.

Well, as much as the forecasters don't like it when I say this, there is some art in weather normalizing. But I don't -- we don't really see any anomalies in this quarter. There have been other quarters where something has really stood out, where there was an anomaly. We don't see anything in this quarter, but take weather normalization with a grain of salt.

[Operator Instructions] And our next question comes from the line of Paul Fremont of Jefferies.

Can you quantify year-to-date what the nuclear decommissioning trust gains are?

Yes, Paul. It -- year-to-date is $0.08.

Okay. And so that was -- and your annual guidance for the gains was -- so in other words, have you realized all that's in your guidance in terms of NDT gains?

Yes, we talked about guidance having 0 to $0.02. And so, we -- some of that includes the additional year-over-year increase in NDT, and we'll just see how fourth quarter goes in realized earnings off of the fund to see whether or not there's an additional contribution or not.

Okay. And then it sounds like the next case or the case you're about to file will not include the gas peaker. So the gas peaker we should assume is going to be part of the '16 case?

Yes. The gas peaker would not go into rates until 2018. So it would be in the case that's filed either in December of '16 or January of '17.

And I'm showing no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the call back over to Pat Vincent-Collawn for any further remarks.

Thank you. And thank you, everyone, for joining us today. We look forward to seeing many of you face-to-face in Dallas at the EEI meetings, and then again in New York on Analyst Day, on December 15. We hope you have a very safe and very happy Halloween. Thank you all.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude the program, and you may all disconnect. Have a great day, everyone.