Greetings. Welcome to the CVR Partners LP Third Quarter 2021 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I'd now like to turn the conference over to Richard Roberts, Director of FP&A and IR. Thank you. You may begin.

Thank you, sherry. Good morning, everyone. We appreciate your participation in today's call. With me today are Mark Pytosh, our Chief Executive Officer; Dane Neumann, our Chief Financial Officer; and other members of management. Prior to discussing our 2021 third quarter results, let me remind you that this conference call may contain forward-looking statements as that term is defined under federal securities laws. For this purpose, any statements made during this call that are not statements of historical facts may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. You are cautioned that these statements may be affected by important factors set forth in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in our latest earnings release. As a result, actual operations or results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except to the extent required by law. Let me remind you that CVR Partners completed a 1-for-10 reverse split of its common units on November 23, 2020. Any per unit references made on this call are on a split adjusted basis. This call also includes various non-GAAP financial measures. The disclosures related to such non-GAAP measures, including reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are included in our 2021 third quarter earnings release that we filed with the SEC yesterday after the close of the market. Let me also remind you that we are a variable distribution MLP. We will review our previously established reserves, current cash usage, evaluate future anticipated cash needs and may reserve amounts for other future cash needs as determined by our general partner's Board. As a result, our distributions, if any, will vary from quarter-to-quarter due to several factors, including but not limited to, operating performance, fluctuations in the prices received for finished products, capital expenditures and cash reserves seem necessary or appropriate by the Board of Directors of our general partner. With that said, I'll turn the call over to Mark Pytosh, our Chief Executive Officer. Mark?

Thank you, Richard. Good morning, everyone. And thank you for joining us for today's call. The summarized financial highlights for the third quarter of 2021 include net sales of 145 million, net income of 35 million, EBITDA is 64 million, and the Board of Directors declared a third quarter distribution of $2.93 per common unit, which will be paid on November 22, 2021 to unit holders of record at the close of the market on November 12, 2021. During the third quarter of 2021, we operated the plants safely and reliably with consolidated ammonia plant utilization of 94%. We experienced approximately five days of downtime at the Coffeeville facility due to an outage at the third-party air separation facility and approximately two days of downtime at both facilities due to externally driven power outages. During the handful of unplanned outages at Coffeeville this year, we used the downtime to complete enough maintenance work that we were able to safely defer the plant turn around, allowing us to take advantage of the current strong market conditions. Our combined operations produced approximately 205,000 gross tons of ammonia, of which 65,000 net tons were available for sale for the third quarter of 2021. This compares to production of 215,000 gross tons of ammonia, of which 71,000 net tons were available for sale in the prior year period. We produced 314,000 tons of UAN in the third quarter of 2021 as compared to 330,000 tons in the prior year period. During the third quarter of 2021, we sold approximately 322,000 tons of UAN at an average price of $305 per ton and approximately 52,000 tons of ammonia at an average price of $507 per ton. Relative to the third quarter of 2020, UAN and ammonia sales volumes were down slightly driven by decline in production volumes, due in part to the previously mentioned outages during the quarter. Year-over-year pricing was 119% higher for UAN and 110% higher for ammonia. The rally in nitrogen fertilizer prices that began earlier this year extended throughout the summer, and prices have continued to move higher in the fall. Fertilizer inventory levels remain tight across the US, as high turnaround activity over the summer and multiple plant shutdowns following Hurricane Ida further reduced available supply in the market. With the energy crunch in Europe and Asia causing a number of fertilizer plant shutdowns and reducing supplies even further, the primary concern in the market is availability of fertilizers and that is fueling the persistent move in higher prices, which I will discuss further in my closing remarks. I will now turn the call over to Dane to discuss our financial results.

Thank you Mark. For the third quarter of 2021, we reported net sales of 145 million and operating income of 46 million compared to net sales of 79 million and an operating loss of 3 million in the third quarter of 2020. Net income for the third quarter of 2021 was 35 million or $3.28 per common unit and EBITDA was 64 million. This compares to a net loss of 19 million or $1.70 per common unit and EBITDA of 15 million for the prior year period. There were no adjustments to EBITDA in either period. The year-over-year increase in EBITDA was driven by higher UAN and ammonia sales prices, offset slightly by higher feedstock costs and operating expenses. Direct operating expenses for the third quarter of 2021 were 48 million compared to 39 million in the prior year period. Third quarter direct operating expenses include an additional $1 million charge for electricity expenses allocated to us by the city of Coffeyville related to Winter Storm Uri. Excluding this charge, as well as inventory and turnaround impacts, direct operating expenses increased by approximately $11 million, primarily related to higher electricity and natural gas costs and higher stock-based compensation, as a result of the increased unit price. Turning to capital spending, during the third quarter of 2021, we spent $7 million on capital projects, which was primarily growth capital related to the urea capacity upgrade at Coffeeville. We estimate total capital spending for 2021 to be approximately 20 million to 23 million, of which 14 to 15 million is expected to be maintenance capital. This excludes turnaround spending, which we expect will be approximately $2 million to $3 million of expense. Looking at the balance sheet, as of September 30, we had approximately $136 million of liquidity, which is comprised of…

Thanks Dane. Crop conditions were stable throughout the summer, and the harvest is nearly complete. The USDA currently estimates planted corn acres were 93 million, with expected yields of 176 bushels per acre, and soybean acres were 88 million with yields of 51 bushels per acre. The expected 2021 inventory carry out of 8.3% for corn and 5.7% for soybeans continues to be at the lower end of the 10 year range. For the 2021-2022 crop year, the USDA estimates the stocks to use ratio to rise to 10.1% for corn and 7.3% for soybean. Crop prices have been a little higher over the past month with December corn at $5.70 and soy beans at $12.50 a bushel and we still expect to see good prices for farmers next year. The big story for the nitrogen fertilizers has been on the supply side of the market. As we discussed on our last earnings call, many North American nitrogen fertilizer producers delayed major plant turnarounds scheduled for 2020 into 2021. Many of these turnarounds started in the third quarter and some resulted in longer outages than expected. Additionally, several other plants had unplanned outages as Hurricane Ida caused multiple plants to be down for a few weeks in September. The result of all this downtime is US nitrogen fertilizer production being much lower in the third quarter of 2021 compared to 2020. In the international markets, an energy shortage developed in September, in both Europe and China that caused natural gas and coal prices to spike forcing these regions to curtail a rush [ph] in energy usage for certain industrial sectors to preserve energy for power generation. In Europe, natural gas prices have spiked to around $30 a MMBtu, making fertilizer production uneconomic and forcing a significant amount of nitrogen fertilizer…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Brian DiRubbio with Baird. Please proceed.

Good morning. First question, Mark, how much of Q4 results - or how much of your production in Q4, do you think will be forward sold?

I'm not really sure I understand the context of that question. Let me try to explain, we sold the third quarter mostly in July and August and that would be typical for seasonal. And for the ammonia - portion of ammonia that we sold, that was done in August, September. In the fourth quarter, we'll pick up some escalation from the rising market, but we'll feel more of that in the first quarter from where - because it didn't really start escalating until the end of September and in October, so we really, at that point, had sold a good chunk of the fourth quarter.

Okay. So when we entered this year, first quarter results were a bit disappointing because you had forward sold a lot of your volume at lower prices. How should we think about that dynamic going into 2022?

Well, this year, typically, we would have sold a lot more in the second half in July and August; we did not do that this year. We sold more just for the third quarter and then the market was escalating into the fourth and so we were sort of capturing that escalation and then it went, I'd call, vertical in October, but we only capture a part of that in the fourth quarter.

Okay. And then switching gears, early this year, you were contemplating possibly converting Coffeeville from pet coke feedstock to natural gas, potentially. Has that thought process changed, given the current environment for natural gas?

Yeah, obviously, the economics have flipped there and pet coke is now more attractive than natural gas. And so we expect that to continue. We always really have that, I call it, option available to us, it's not really that difficult to switch ultimately to natural gas if we choose. But last year, we were looking at $2 natural gas, now we're looking at $5.50 natural gas, so it's not really that attractive to move over, so pet coke is going to be a very competitive feedstock going forward. So it gives us good diversity in our portfolio and we're going to stay the course on pet coke.

Okay, good, because I thought it would have been a mistake to switch over to natural gas personally, but I know I'm only an analyst. Just in terms of debt reduction, did I hear you right, that you've reserved $50 million for another pay down to the 23 notes for next year.

So the reserve in the distribution this quarter was for another paid out of the $50 million, correct.

Perfect. Thank you so much. Appreciate the time.

Thanks Brain.

Our next question is from William Stein, private investor. Please proceed.

Hey, Mark. Thanks so much for taking my question. It's about pricing but it sounds like you've already noted that prices are rising, so that shouldn't be a surprise as we move forward. But there's an aspect of your reporting that I just want to better understand. In the press releases, you have this section that refers to key market indicators. I think there are a lot of investors that view that as current spot prices but I suspect this relates more to retail pricing. Can you give us maybe just walk through an example as to how your prices realized that gate in a given quarter relate to those key market indicators? Are those at all forward looking or is that just more informative about the quarter that's already closed and should not be relied upon for sort of forecasting?

Well, the prices that are in there are, I would call it, current spot price. And so to the extent that we would sell spot loads today from either of the two facilities, that would be I think representative there the green markets is a retail price, so you have to take away the markup there from a retail perspective but if we were selling - if we sell spot loads today or this week or next week, that's kind of representative of the current pricing. Generally, we would have sold a good portion of a quarter in advance of coming into the quarter. We don't generally sell everything spot but, as an example, we're going through the ammonia run at East Dubuque, it'll be this week and next few weeks and there will be, we think, incremental demand and the demand will be spot, there'll be spot loads, and those will be at smart prices. Now, we installed previously a part of our ammonia back in kind of the August, September timeframe and obviously, prices have escalated quite a bit, so the spot price will be much higher than the contracted price. But we've been in a rising pricing environment really since the spring and we've been capturing it as we go. But, again, as I mentioned in the previous answer, as we get into the first quarter, we're going to see the kind of the full brunt of that, the vertical pricing that's occurred here in the fourth quarter.

Thanks, Mark and one follow-up, if I can. I think many investors noted with great interest and excitement that you bought shares on the open market during the quarter. I'm guessing that that might relate to your view as to the longevity of the current cycle and certainly the better trajectory that we're in now than we've been in the last few years. Can you talk about the longevity of this cycle, as you see it? Thank you.

I think the key to longevity of any cycle is the underlying customer economics and so crop pricing is really critical for length. And I feel really good about 2022 because you look out at demand for grains, and actually the kind of sleeper [ph] out there is wheat, wheat has emerged here in the last couple months, at probably a 10 year high prices. Wheat is a good crop for us around the Coffeeville facility in Kansas. Kansas is wheat country. And so grain prices are key to longevity. If farmer economic stay high like they are now, I think we can have an extended cycle and to me, I feel very good about just generally the demand over '22 and even starting to think about '23 because of the farmer economics. And obviously, we have a lot of major global energy issues to deal with, which is creating even more pressure on the production for fertilizer, and I don't really see an easy answer to fixing the global energy shortage here in the next quarter. So I feel really good about where we're headed but we're not going to lose any focus. We're going to do what we do well, which is run our plants well and market our product well.

Great. Thanks for taking my questions.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question is from Rob McGuire with Granite Research. Please proceed.

Good morning, Mark, Dane and Richard. Can you just talk a little bit about the anti-dumping and countervailing duty investigations? And do you have a view as to - with this impact pricing, would a favorable ruling result in higher prices or is this more removal of a threat of negative - potential negative imports negatively impacting pricing?

Rob, this Mark. I think that what I would see there is if it is a favorable ruling that it probably just extends the supply issues we have in the United States because if that - if we did reduce or eliminate the Russian and Trinidadian UAM, I think that that would create additional supply issues in the US over time, but the market globally is trying to adjust to this and so, it's kind of hard to say that with that factor alone really change the pricing environment compared to the energy issues that we see globally. It would be a factor, but it would be one of several factors there. But from my perspective, typically in these cases I think if they decided to go forward with it, they, in many times, they do end up imposing some sort of duty here and I think it's very clear that that product is subsidized from a natural gas perspective and you can see that globally kind of where prices are in the markets where they're producing versus, like European gas pricing. So I think it would just - it would probably just extend out the supply issues that we have in the US compared to current market. So, it could extend out this supply issue.

Thank you. I've no further questions.

Thanks, Rob.

We have reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to management for closing comments.

Well, thanks, everybody for being on the call today and we look forward to sharing with you our fourth quarter results in February. Thank you very much.

Thank you. This does conclude today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time and thank you for your participation.