Good morning and welcome to the UGI AmeriGas Second Quarter 2014 Earnings conference call. Please note that this call is being recorded today, May 8, 2014 at 9:00 am Eastern time. After the presentation, we will conduct a question and answer session. Instructions will be provided at that time. I would now like to turn the meeting over to Dan Platt, Treasurer of UGI Corporation. You may begin.

Thank you, Ryan. Good morning and thank you for joining us. As we begin, let me remind you that our comments today will include certain forward-looking statements which management of UGI and AmeriGas believe to be reasonable as of today’s date only. Actual results may differ significantly because of risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond management’s control. You should read our annual reports on Form 10-K for a more extensive list of factors that could affect results, but among them are adverse weather conditions, cost volatility and availability of all energy products, increased customer conservation measures, the impact of pending and future legal proceedings, domestic and international political, regulatory and economic conditions, currency exchange rate fluctuations, the timing of development of Marcellus shale gas production, the timing and success of our commercial initiatives and investments to grow our business, and our ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses and achieve anticipated synergies. UGI and AmeriGas undertake no obligation to release revisions to their forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after today. In addition, our remarks will reference certain non-GAAP financial measures that management believes provide useful information to investors to more effectively evaluate the year-over-year results of operations of the companies. These non-GAAP financial measures are not comparable to measures used by other companies and should be considered in conjunction with performance measures such as cash flow from operating activities. With me today are Hugh Gallagher, CFO of AmeriGas Propane; Kirk Oliver, CFO of UGI Corporation; Jerry Sheridan, President and CEO of AmeriGas Propane; and your host, President and CEO of UGI Corporation, John Walsh. John?

Thanks Dan. Good morning and welcome to our call. I trust that you’ve all had a chance to review our press release reporting strong second quarter results for UGI and AmeriGas. It was an exceptional quarter for the company and for the energy sector, particularly for companies like ours with a significant concentration of assets, resources and customers in the mid-Atlantic region. I’ll comment on our key activities in the second quarter, then I’ll turn it over to Kirk who will provide you with a more detailed review of UGI’s financial performance. Jerry will follow with an overview on AmeriGas and I’ll wrap up with an update on our strategic initiatives. Our Q2 GAAP EPS was $1.84 while our adjusted EPS, which reflects a $0.06 mark-to-market adjustment in our midstream and marketing business, was $1.90. This result compares very favorably with our adjusted EPS of $1.51 in the second quarter of FY13. Accordingly, we increased our fiscal ’14 guidance range to $2.95 to $3.05 from the previously stated range of $2.60 to $2.70. Kirk will comment in more detail on guidance and our second quarter performance in a few minutes. Turning back to Q2, these very strong results with adjusted net income up 28% reflect the positive impact of colder weather in most of our service territories, strong operational performance, and more critically the return of significant volatility across the natural gas and electricity sectors in the mid-Atlantic and northeast. It is worth noting that we delivered this strong quarterly performance despite extremely warm weather in Europe where several of our markets experienced their warmest winter on record. While weather, as we all know so well, varies year to year, the factors impacting capacity values and delivered gas costs, particularly on peak days, are more fundamental and far-reaching. Kirk will…

Thanks John, and good morning everyone. John mentioned that it was a much colder than normal winter for most of the U.S. this quarter, but as this chart demonstrates, it was really a tale of two continents from a global perspective. While temperatures in North America were on average much colder than normal, temperatures in Europe were much warmer than normal, in many cases setting new records for warmth. You’ll notice that even in the U.S., the utility with its northeastern footprint experienced colder temperatures than AmeriGas did with its national footprint. While weather for most of the country was much colder than normal, a number of western states, including California, experienced a very warm winter season. Jerry will go into more detail on the operations for AmeriGas in the quarter, so I’ll just summarize the financial performance here. We are reporting operating income at AmeriGas of $285 million, an increase of $18 million over last year. Total margin increased by $37 million, reflecting a modest increase in unit margins and higher retail volumes sold, offset somewhat by lower ancillary sales and services margin. Operating expenses increased by $20 million driven by increased retail volume, incremental distribution cost associated with supply shortages in certain regions, and a greater accrual for uncollectable accounts associated with the higher revenue. We managed our pricing in this high cost environment to achieve EBITDA of $0.70 per gallon, an increase of $0.03 over the prior year. Operating expenses in the prior year period included $5 million of transition expenses associated with the integration of Heritage Propane. Finally, I’d also like to point out that effective April 2014, all propane hedges will be reported as mark-to-market hedges. Existing hedges, which have qualified for hedge accounting, will run off over time. Going forward, we will highlight any…

Thanks very much, Kirk. EBITDA for the second quarter was $331 million for AmeriGas, or 7% above the $309 million earned last year on higher volume and margins, offset somewhat by higher expenses. We have raised the low end of our guidance by $15 million with a new range of $660 million to $675 million in EBITDA for the year. At these levels, our new AmeriGas is literally delivering earnings almost double that of AmeriGas prior to the Heritage Propane acquisition. Volume for the quarter was 475 million or 2.3% above last year. Temperatures were 9.7% colder than last year, and although the news headlines for the quarter included reports of colder than normal winter weather, the actual weather was very different from the eastern and western halves of the country. Cold weather in the eastern half of the country was in contrast to the western U.S., which experienced warmer than normal temperatures during the quarter. In fact, a large part of California and Arizona, where we have significant operations, experienced the warmest January to March period since 1895. Our western operations represent nearly one-third of our business. Although the cold eastern and midwest weather is always welcome for our business, the much publicized shortage of propane and a 51% increase in average propane costs at Mont Belvieu from the same period last year created a difficult work environment for many of our locations. Customers anxious about propane supply and the higher cost created additional customer service challenges for our field teams. Although this is only the second winter operating as a new company following the Heritage acquisition, we’re pleased with how the operation team responded to this challenge. Our integrated operations shared resources and moved propane to where it was sorely needed. This included activating our AmeriGas airborne division,…

Thanks, Jerry. I’d like to briefly review progress on the strategic investments and programs that are critical to our future. Our midstream strategy is progressing rapidly with significant potential for additional investment to address the infrastructure gap created by the ramp-up in natural gas demand. Earlier this week, we announced two additional phases for our Auburn pipeline project and another project in northeast Pennsylvania as well. When completed in late 2015, these investments at Auburn will nearly double the capacity of the system and raise the total capital invested on the Auburn project to roughly $230 million. We’re excited by the opportunity to further expand our midstream network in the Marcellus and we’re actively pursuing a range of new investments. The gas utility received approval from the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission for our Get Gas program. These growth extension tariffs enable us to economically serve previously unserved or underserved municipalities within our existing service territory. The program calls for a $75 million spend over the first five years. The initial response to the program has been tremendous and we’re launching the execution phase for the first wave of main extensions. As Jerry just noted in his remarks, AmeriGas had a strong quarter with adjusted EBITDA up 7% despite significant challenges related to the propane shortage in the eastern and midwest states. We’re continuing to see very strong performance from our national accounts and ACE cylinder exchange segments where our ability to serve major regional and national customers is a clear differentiator. While our domestic business has benefited from cold weather, our European team was faced with some of the warmest weather in recorded history. Weather in France was 16.5% warmer than normal while weather across Flaga was 18% warmer than normal. As Kirk noted in his remarks, our performance in…

[Operator instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Carl Kirst from BMO Capital. Your line is open. Carl Kirst – BMO Capital: Thanks, good morning everybody. Congrats on a great quarter. John, obviously I want to focus a little bit on the midstream and marketing, and some of the themes you hit as far as the enduring infrastructure gap, the sustainability, notwithstanding the severity of the cold weather. I guess one of the things I’m trying to grapple with a little bit is how much of this is, for instance, basis-oriented versus the significant demand that we’ve seen in this past quarter. Perhaps maybe the best way to ask the question is we continue to see very wide basis today in the Marcellus, at least, relative to Gulf Coast. So as we roll forward, the normal optimization activities that are ongoing, are you seeing a significant structural uplift as we go into the fiscal third quarter relative to the same time last year, or is this primarily going to be when there are opportunities to really take advantage and outperform, if you will, that it’s going to be in these peak demand stress periods?

Yeah. As you know, Carl, it’s a complicated equation and you’ve got a lot of variables, so there’s no sort of absolute view. I think these charts that Kirk showed, particularly the one that showed the years leading up to this year and kind of reinforced or highlighted the fact we had really been in a dormant period as we went through the recession in terms of volatility and values, and certainly we see that coming back on the back of significant demand. I do think—our view, as I mentioned in the comments, is that it’s going to be enduring. It will be variable and there will be volatility, but what’s been striking to us – and we’ve commented on it a number of times in calls – is the strength of demand, so I think there’s new capacity that’s coming on-stream that will certainly help in meeting the requirements as they exist today, but we also see a continuing strength in demand that will be a little bit of a moving target in terms of having sufficient infrastructure to satisfy that demand. So that’s what gives us a lot of confidence in seeing continuing value from the existing network of assets that we have, but also in the fact that there’s going to be ongoing opportunities for investment. So from our standpoint, and again we’re historically a marketing and distribution company so we’re tied pretty closely to the demand side of the equation, for the last three or four years we’ve been really impressed and sort of impacted by the strength of demand. So I think in my mind, that’s the thing that’s most often underestimated, is just how much that demand is increasing and the impact that that has on infrastructure and then obviously the value of that infrastructure, and it’s particularly intense in the mid-Atlantic and northeast and it’s going to take time to address it in terms of investments in projects across the industry that will fulfill the need and normalize again. Carl Kirst – BMO Capital: That’s very helpful, so basically even as there are some regional de-bottlenecking projects coming via Constitution or a slew of others, you think what the market potentially is missing is just the demand component, that that is really—that need to serve, if you will, is going to be the enduring piece.

Yes, and I think what was pretty striking this winter, and we did have—I mean, it was quite cold in periods but it wasn’t sort of design cold, as Kirk noted, from a utility standpoint. It was cold, but it was not the extremes that you plan for. But what was striking was the combination of sort of fundamental demand to serve our customers’ needs, which is primarily for heating, coupled with this ramping demand on the power generation side to provide power, so you have this winter peak now that’s pretty intense. So you saw that, coupled with almost every utility in the eastern United States announcing record throughputs, and records that were not 1% above the prior records but like ours, where we were 12% above. We were not unique, so you see again the strength of demand across a large portion of the eastern and midwest U.S. that is pretty intense, and it’s a great thing. We’re excited about it, but certainly there’s a need for a lot more infrastructure to serve the demand, which I think will be ongoing for several years, a number of years. Carl Kirst – BMO Capital: If I could ask one other question, and it relates to the potential investment, the potential for additional infrastructure investment that you cited, and certainly congratulations on Auburn 3 – always good to kind of see that continuing. So I guess my question on that is, as you see opportunities, or perhaps even coming out of this winter and having renewed conversations with producers, do you see the additional pathways that you all can provide or services you all can provide primarily being more in that upstream camp, like expanding Auburn, or does that even potentially put the longer mileage pipeline systems that you guys have visited in the past back up in play?

Yeah, we would be looking at larger projects and projects that would enable us to serve other portions of our service territory. Obviously we’d bring that to customer demand, and I think—so we’d be looking at additional pipeline solutions and opportunities that would enable us to address the need across the remainder of our territories and elsewhere in the region, and I think one thing that this winter did was heighten the focus among producers and on the customer side and the distribution side, heighten the focus on the need for clarity around your solution for capacity. So that’s helpful from a project development standpoint to have that heightened awareness and focus because after this winter, I don’t think it’s clear to anybody in the market that the capacity—it’s clear that the capacity may not be there, so they can’t assume that capacity is going to be available because clearly this winter, they saw that trying to access capacity at the peak was extremely costly. Carl Kirst – BMO Capital: Great. I appreciate all the color. Thanks guys.

Thank you, Carl.

Your next question comes from the line of Chris Sighinolfi from Jefferies. Your line is open. Chris Sighinolfi – Jefferies: Hey John, good morning. Thanks for these slides and the added color – it’s always helpful to understand the magnitude of the relative deltas and drivers, so appreciate that. Just one quick question, maybe for Jerry first, on APU guidance. Obviously I appreciate it’s tough to forecast the future, but if I just look at the sort of trailing 12-month or four-quarter number, EBITDA generation from APU, I found myself above the high end of the new guidance range. So I’m just wondering – you did highlight some equipment repairs and maintenance issues maybe stemming from the challenges this winter, but I was wondering if you could spend a little bit more time on maybe the cautious stance year-on-year with the back half of the year.

Yeah, I think what you’re going to find is Q3 will be the delta from last year, and we’ve already seen, now that April is complete, that the weather in April year-over-year was 12% warmer. So we really did have a terrific spring last year that seems to be unrepeatable, and we do have the flop over all the things I described with the collections process and fixing our equipment, so really I think it’s Q3 gives us concern. Chris Sighinolfi – Jefferies: Okay. In terms of—you know, I know that there was the need to short fill some customers and do some things like that, just based on constrained supplies and inventories over the course of the winter, does that lead—I guess, do you have a sense of sort of where maybe customer inventory balances reside now, and does that leave an opportunity for maybe the first quarter of next year?

Yeah, great question. We talk about this all the time, whether customers are at the point where they are very low in the field inventory, and we don’t have complete visibility to that or not. I am hopeful, though, that we could in fact have a very good Q4 if that is the case, but because I think for the most part our customers are reasonably happy that the heating season is over because of the larger bills that they faced, we really just don’t have clear visibility as to whether there’s going to be a big pop in Q4 or not. So not knowing it, I really can’t project it. I’d say the only thing that’s really good at this point is that cost has stabilized and the winter is starting to become a rear view mirror thing for most of our customers. Our collections are strong, and I really believe once we get into summer that the winter will be something that’s somewhat forgotten by a lot of our customers and we’ll be ready for next year. Chris Sighinolfi – Jefferies: Okay, great. Jerry, one more for me for you. When we had the site visit in October, we were talking about sort of a pilot program on the technology side that you guys might be looking to implement. Probably that took a back burner, I would imagine, over the winter; but as we move through the spring, anything to update on that initiative?

Are you talking about the tank monitoring or— Chris Sighinolfi – Jefferies: Yeah, what you were doing in terms of driver behavior and iPads and things like that.

Oh, okay. No, we’re not slowing that down at all. What we’re doing is going systematically through the country and we’ve got a roll-out that is almost complete of our underlying SAP enterprise software. Once a district has SAP and distribution on SAP, we move to roll out iPads to drivers. The drivers love it. It gives us great visibility to what they’re doing, control over routes and so forth, so really it’s just a matter of how quick physically can we roll this out. It’s going to be multi-year, but we’ve made great progress. I think by the end of this year, we’ll have half of our locations fully iPad-ed out with drivers. Chris Sighinolfi – Jefferies: Great, okay. That’s phenomenal. Thanks very much, Jerry. John, one question, I guess to dovetail off the back of Carl’s questions. Obviously the weather is great when we can get it, and it pads the results and, I imagine, the cash flows as well – we’ll see when the Q comes. But just wondering, given that sort of the use of proceeds at this point—maybe not proceeds, but use of cash at this point given the strength from the winter, obviously we saw the additions of Auburn loop and the midstream projects. But you did have last fall the authorization on share repurchase, so I’m just wondering how things stack up maybe now that a bit more cash than we anticipated, given the weather.

Yeah, I’ll comment briefly and maybe Kirk can comment on the share repurchase activity. Briefly, we consider the share repurchases fundamentally just part of an overall capital allocation program we have in the company. The good news for us, and it’s sort of highlighted in our comments, we’ve got a great range of potential opportunities out there with everything that’s happening, so we feel like we have avenues we can pursue in terms of putting this cash to good use, which is I think primarily what our shareholders expect of us. And with all the changes happening and the evolution that we see in the energy market, particularly in the northeast and mid-Atlantic, we’re excited about putting a lot of that capital to work in the market on high quality projects; but we’re also utilizing, as you noted, in a share repurchase program as part of that capital allocation process. I’ll let Kirk give just a brief update on that.

Yeah. Chris, we’ve repurchased about 110,000 shares at the end of the quarter, and we just keep kind of slowly buying them in. We might be more opportunistic down the road if we feel like it’s a good idea, but we don’t have any plans to be more or less aggressive than what we’ve been so far.

As always with us, it’s a balanced view on capital allocation. We want to make sure we’re making good decisions and using that cash wisely. It’s great for us that with the results we had this year, we’ve got a strong—major opportunity in terms of incremental cash flows coming in, and we’ll work just as hard to put that cash to good use. Chris Sighinolfi – Jefferies: Okay, great. I guess to just feed off of that with one quick additional, John – as we think about—you know, you guys have spent or deployed quite a bit of capital over the last several years, sort of beefing up and building out the European LPG distribution business. I’m just curious as it pertains to some of the things we see occurring in eastern Europe now, does that change—from a political standpoint, does that change at all your view, the board’s view as to incremental investments on the continent, or is this just headline risk that you’re not seeing have any impact on the actual operations or appetite to continue growing there?

Yeah, it’s a good question. We’re still very focused on opportunities for future or further investment in Europe. We have seen no impact to date in terms of any of the issues that are occurring in the Ukraine or the Crimea region. One of the things we said over the years about Europe that is important to us is supply diversity, so that’s an area we’ll focus on. It’s the flipside of kind of the U.S. export question, is looking at it from the European perspective and the more supply diversity we have in Europe, from our standpoint as a distributor, the better. So we’ll continue to look at our sort of supply portfolio, look at smart ways to diversify, and then plan accordingly for any potential disruptions that could occur in supply chains; but we have seen nothing to date. There’s nothing that we see looking ahead that would indicate there’s going to be disruptions, but like a lot of things we do, you plan for alternatives and you over the long term look to diversify and spread in terms of any kind of sourcing strategy, so that’s a fundamental direction in Europe as well. Chris Sighinolfi – Jefferies: Guys, I really appreciate all the added color this morning. Thanks.

Thanks Chris.

Your next question comes from the line of Theresa Chen from Barclays Capital. Your line is open. Theresa Chen – Barclays: Good morning. I have a couple questions on AmeriGas. Now that the winter is behind us, can you give us some color on what you saw in terms of customer conservation, the response to price increases, and if there was any difference between residential versus commercial?

Well, we do a pretty in-depth conservation study but we usually let the whole month of April go by, so we haven’t done that yet so I don’t have hard data to give you. Certainly the winter did create on the residential side some anxiousness by our customers. You know, if you short fill and it’s cold outside, customers are concerned you’re not going to come back. It was a great opportunity for AmeriGas, though, to demonstrate to our customers that we just have more resources than most of the smaller independent marketers. We’re able to get our hands on propane, number one, but also bring drivers from other parts of the country and make sure that we were in fact fully in business and keeping them warm through the winter. I don’t have hard data, but I think probably on our next quarter call we’d have a good sense for whether we really did see year-over-year decrement in consumption. But it will be a tough one this year, just because of what you mentioned. Theresa Chen – Barclays: Got it. In terms of the margin outlook, have you worked through passing most of the higher wholesale costs through, or should we see some more work to be done in the later quarters? Is that what you were referring to in terms of the collection process?

Well, collections is just really bringing the cash in. We laid out all the cash for the propane, we delivered it, we need to get paid. That has gone extremely well, actually. I mean, it’s been very routine for us to collect $25 million to $30 million a day, so it’s been a good spring for us cash flow-wise. So I’m not concerned at all about the collection side of things. Customers are paying and we’re following up, and as I said in the previous question, it’s feeling to us like this whole winter event is becoming a rear view mirror event for a lot of our customers as we talk to them about signing up for next year. Theresa Chen – Barclays: Got it. Lastly, given the difficult operating environment over the winter, do you think this has accelerated some consolidation in the industry? Have smaller players put themselves up for sale at better prices, or is it still too early to see that?

We’re seeing activity. I wouldn’t call it unusual. Usually coming out of the spring, there’s many marketers, whether it’s a retirement event or they found the business to be difficult and offer themselves up to be bought. But I wouldn’t say the quantity of targets is any larger than we’ve seen any random year over the last five. Theresa Chen – Barclays: Great. Thank you very much.

Again ladies and gentlemen, if you would like to ask a question, please press star, one on your telephone keypad. Your next question comes from the line of Brian Brycynski from Bank of America. Your line is open. Brian Brycynski – Bank of America: Hi guys. Congratulations on the quarter. So John, you’ve talked a lot about the infrastructure gap and how enduring it could be. I was wondering if you think it provides sufficient enough growth potential for UGI that you’d revise up the 6% to 10% annual EPS growth target.

Well, we look at that every year, so obviously as we come out in the fall, we’ll be able to update that guidance. It’s intentionally a pretty wide range, the 6 to 10, so it sort of assumes ramp up in growth and change. So no, I wouldn’t comment on that at all other than it will get a hard look this summer and we’ll update all of you in the fall when we talk about our guidance for FY15. Brian Brycynski – Bank of America: Okay, understood. Shifting a little bit, just if you could touch on repatriation. Does the weaker than expected quarter in Europe affect your plans at all or how you see that going forward?

No, it doesn’t. It doesn’t change our plans in terms of repatriation there. We tend to bring the cash—we tend to leave the cash there unless we have some need for it here, so we’re building some cash in Europe right now but the performance doesn’t really affect the decision making on that. Brian Brycynski – Bank of America: Okay. And then last thing from me, given your targeted payout ratio and the dividend or potential for dividend increases of 4% or above, given the windfall from this winter, can you discuss the potential for dividend increase? I know you touched on capital allocation a little bit in regards to share buybacks, but from the dividend side as well, if you could just discuss that.

Yeah, we will step back, as we do every year, and talk to our board about sort of the outlook for the business. We have our targeted payout ratio and our current dividend policy. That all gets reviewed as part of our sort of annual budget and planning cycle that we undertake in the summer, so it will be reviewed in detail. We’ll look at future prospects which are, as we noted, positive, and that’s when we’ll make that assessment. And in doing so, the board certainly will be looking to us for a mid to long-term perspective and view in terms of the company’s performance, so that will all be taken into account as they review and assess the recommended approach on dividend payout ratios, et cetera. Brian Brycynski – Bank of America: Okay, great. I appreciate the color.

Okay, thanks Brian.

Your next question comes from the line of Roger Young from Miller/Howard Investments. Your line is open. Roger Young – Miller/Howard Investments: Thank you. Could you update us on the relationship with Tenaska and the opportunities there, and secondly, how much capital involved in the Auburn loop?

Yeah, in terms of Tenaska, that relationship is ongoing. We have both the—it’s a relatively small investment but an important one, important relationship for us. We’re working with them and they are driving the production schedule. Obviously as natural gas values move up, the future view on production levels is impacted, and they’re also looking at timing of when their second set of dedicated acreage will ramp up in terms of production. On that acreage, that’s where we have the gathering contract to supply the gathering services, so we’ll look at that. On Auburn, we announced the total spend of $80 million. About three-quarters of that is the Auburn portion of the project. Roger Young – Miller/Howard Investments: Speaking of the infrastructure gap, how valuable is UGI’s right-of-way and it’s total gross consumption of natural gas in your getting into deals?

The way we think about our position or opportunities, we think that balanced set of capability, the position we have in the region, I think of the two items you mentioned, the customer demand is the more critical one. The rights-of-way for the most part, we are secure and we’re acquiring those rights-of-way as we put projects in place, so of the two pieces, the demand we service is very important and fundamentally what we’ve done for the northeast portion of our service territory now through these investments is convert that customer base from long-haul supply from the Gulf to Marcellus supply on a short-haul pipe at a much lower cost, so it’s a great solution for our customers and has turned into a very attractive project for us. We’d like to continue to develop projects that enable us to develop a new investment opportunity for the company and provide an attractive solution for customers, so that is what makes that customer demand side so critical for us in terms of us executing our strategies. Roger Young – Miller/Howard Investments: Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Edward Rowe from Raymond James. Your line is open. Edward Rowe – Raymond James: Good morning, guys. A quick question on UGI, and this has probably been asked before but I wanted to get some further insight. We’ve seen a trend of the so-called movement toward MLPs and value enhancement from C-corp utilities using a carve-out of pipelines and midstream assets, and carving them out into MLP vehicles. Can you share with us maybe your thoughts on some of the strengths and weaknesses on using this strategy for some of the pipeline or midstream assets in order to maybe get some uplift in valuations and use an MLP vehicle as a monetization for some of your growth projects?

We have—certainly as UGI, given the relationship with AmeriGas, as a corporation we’re very comfortable with that structure. We’ve been associated with AmeriGas MLP since its inception in the mid-90’s, so we think we fully understand kind of the benefits of and the attractiveness of the MLP structure. We don’t have a stated intent to—we haven’t said that we have an intent to create a midstream MLP. We look at it as one option that we have as a company in terms of if it’s attractive in enhancing our ability to access capital at an attractive rate, it would certainly be looked at. The good news for us at the present time is we are busily developing projects we have exceptionally good cash generation as a company. We can fund a lot of our projects with no debt just from cash we generate from operations, so that’s the good news, and we have attractive projects coming our way so we tend to focus primarily on the fundamentals of the project and the projects and the investment opportunities. But having said that, we will look at any option that makes sense for us. As I noted, we’re very familiar with the MLP structure and it is there as an option, and we would consider that in conjunction with the board if it made sense for us. Edward Rowe – Raymond James: Great, thanks on that. Second question, just kind of a macro kind of question in regards to northeast and NGLs. With no really Y-grade (ph) takeaway capacity coming on line within that region, and the cold winter has brought propane inventories down, but now we’re seeing inventories in pad 1 trend at an accelerated rate upwards. Are you guys seeing an increased demand from producers on using trucking within the region, and how do you guys think that’s going to ultimately play out within the northeast? Thanks.

Yeah, I’ll comment briefly and certainly Jerry can comment with a lot more detail and knowledge than I on the propane side. But just in general, this is from UGI’s perspective on both natural gas and propane even though the logistics, obviously, are quite different, having significant demand, whether it’s for natural gas or propane, adjacent to or basically on top of the significant production levels is quite important and generates opportunities for us to enhance margin, reduce cost, et cetera, by sourcing effectively. So it’s one of the strengths of the company in general – we’ve focused a lot of attention on supply, supply strategies, and making sure we’re linking our operational execution to our supply position. Over the last three or four years now, we’ve seen a huge change in our supply environment and the great thing about it is the new sources that are coming on-stream are right adjacent to significant demand for UGI or AmeriGas. So that’s a great thing, and the key for us is then sort of executing on those opportunities, and we’re doing that on both the natural gas side of the house and on the AmeriGas side. Now I’ll turn it over to Jerry, who can comment on AmeriGas specifically.

Sure. Yeah, we’re talking to all our suppliers now about next winter, and there does seem to be almost an insatiable demand to push propane outside the country as fast as they can do it. The problem is, as you cited, that they can’t do it as fast as they’d like to. We’re hopeful that there is going to be some stranded propane going into next season, which will just give us great stability on the price itself; and absent the kind of crop drying crisis that we had last winter, I don’t see that there’s any reason why we’d experience another shortage situation as long as we’re smart about getting our storage filled going into the season. But I think we’re hopeful that this kind of stranded situation is only going to help us with propane under a dollar.

Your last question comes from the line of Eric Shiu from Wells Fargo. Your line is open. Eric Shiu – Wells Fargo: Hey, good morning guys. Just had two quick questions on AmeriGas. First, can you quantify the incremental OPEX that was required to procure the additional propane supplies; and then second, the quarter reflected higher uncollectables. Can you provide your expectation for the balance of the year?

Okay, well as you saw, there was a—I mean, we’re a middle man, right, so we don’t make the propane, we just resell it. So the market price for propane grew by 50% in the quarter, so that’s the kind of easy quantification of our cost. As you saw in our EBITDA per gallon, we had to recover not only that cost but the additional operating expenses, which really you could point to as being completely represented by overtime, which was working seven days a week, the bad debt that you mentioned, and all the repair and maintenance items that I cited. But our OPEX quarter to quarter was up about 6%, about $14 million, and we were able to price accordingly. Eric Shiu – Wells Fargo: Okay, great, and then just your expectations for the balance of the year on uncollectables?

Okay, I’m sorry. Collections have been very strong, as I said. The last few weeks have been terrific. We had—during the winter season itself, as I mentioned, we did have anxious customers wondering why are the prices going up as they did, and we had to explain that the costs were up 50% and we were simply passing it on, so that’s often hard for customers to understand but once we’re able to at least describe it and maybe lucky for us it was in the news enough, that they understood it. We’ve been able to, I think, solve this problem just by virtue of the fact that the customers are in fact paying well. Eric Shiu – Wells Fargo: Okay, great. Thank you.

We have no further questions in queue. I would now like to turn our call back to the presenters.

Okay, thanks very much, Ryan, I appreciate it. I appreciate all your time on the call this morning, and we look forward to talking to you next quarter on the call. Thank you.