Mike Thomson
Analyst · Jefferies. Please go ahead
Look, I would say Kellen first, thanks for the question. I think the diversity not only from a geography perspective, but also from a sector or segment perspective is true. We are seeing our solutions and frankly our strategy is our solutions, although geared to a specific industry, when we have dialogue on how it applies, are homogeneously applied, right. So I don't think that there's any kind of one sector, or region that dominate that spend, which is great, right. We want to have solutions that are universally applied. They always have, a very specific industry slant or sector slant, or even region slant when we tailor it to our clients. But in general, I would say we're seeing a much more combined offering, when we go to market and the success that we had. I mentioned on one of the other comments earlier here, most of the new logos and the new business that we're signing, are either adding a component to an existing base that gives us a cross-sell component to it, or the business itself when it's a new logo, has both, our DWS and CA&I component pieces in it. So, one of the beauties of our strategy I think is that regardless of the starting point. There's a connection to the other solutions that we do, and it really depends on the scope of the client, RFP or RFI that comes our way and we can pivot our messaging, to be tailored to that specific ask. So I guess the macro view, it's pretty diverse both regionally and by industry and can be tailored to those. So our solutions in general are resonating. And I think that you could look at that, how it resonates both from the industry analyst perspective, and the things that Peter mentioned around kind of how we sit in those various quadrants. And then in the solutions that we've had success in penetrating, this soft market with.