Thank you for standing by. My name is Krista, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the US Foods First Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. I will now turn the conference over to Mike Neese, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. Mike, you may begin.

Thank you, Krista. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the US Foods First Quarter Fiscal 2024 Earnings Call. On today's call, we have Dave Flitman, our CEO; and Dirk Locascio, our CFO. We will take your questions after our prepared remarks conclude. [Operator Instructions] Our earnings release issued earlier this morning and today's presentation can be found on the Investor Relations page of our website at ir.usfoods.com. During today's call, unless otherwise stated, we're comparing our first quarter 2024 to the same period in our first quarter fiscal year 2023. In addition to historical information, certain statements made during today's call are considered forward-looking statements. Please review the risk factors in our Form 10-K for a detailed discussion of the potential factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in those statements. During today's call, we will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. All reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP financial measures are included in the schedules on our earnings press release as well as in the presentation slides posted on our website. We are not providing reconciliations to forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures. Finally, we're excited to host our Investor Day on June 5 at our headquarters in Rosemont. If you're interested in attending, please reach out to us in Investor Relations. Thank you. I'd like to turn the call over to Dave.

Thanks, Mike. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Let's turn to today's agenda. I'll start by sharing the progress we've made executing on our strategy and several key achievements from the first quarter, which set us up for a strong year ahead. I will then hand it over to Dirk to review our first quarter financial results and our fiscal 2024 guidance. Following a slower start to the year due to adverse weather and labor disruptions, our first quarter earnings came in as expected. The continued execution of our strategy and long-range plan resulted in adjusted EBITDA of $356 million, representing approximately 6% growth. As we highlighted in February, adjusted EBITDA was negatively impacted by approximately $20 million from increased cost to serve our customers and volume headwinds from labor disruption and weather-related issues in January. Of the $20 million impact, approximately $15 million was incremental operating expense to support the business during the labor disruption. Excluding this negative impact, our underlying adjusted EBITDA growth was approximately 12%, and we remain confident in achieving our full year guidance. This performance demonstrates the strength of our business model, the commitment of our 30,000 hard-working associates and our ability to win in any environment. Total case growth was 4.2% for the quarter with share gains continuing in target customer types, and our independent case volume grew 4.6%. In fact, for independent restaurants, our share gains accelerated from the fourth quarter to the first quarter as we grew share for the 12th consecutive quarter. In early April, we closed on our previously announced acquisition of IWC Food Service, and we are excited to have them on our team. As a result of deploying capital towards our tuck-in M&A strategy, we did not purchase a significant number of shares in the…

Thank you, Dave, and good morning, everyone. Our performance for the first quarter was consistent with our expectations as we executed well despite the challenging start to the year, highlighting our strong financial discipline and staying focused on what we can control. Starting on Slide 10. First quarter net sales increased 4.8% to $8.9 billion, driven by total case volume growth of 4.2% and food cost inflation of 1.5%. Mix was a headwind of nearly 90 basis points. Independent restaurant volume increased 4.6% overall and 2.9% organic. Health care and hospitality grew 6.4% and 0.9%, respectively. Health care growth remains strong while hospitality growth was less than we expected due to softer same-store sales and a tougher compare versus a strong prior year. We expect hospitality to accelerate through the second quarter and the second half of this year as we onboard new customers. Adjusted EBITDA grew 5.6% from the prior year to $356 million. This was slightly above the high end of our guidance, driven by a combination of profitable volume growth, strong gross profit gains and solid expense management. Adjusted EBITDA margin remained largely unchanged at 4% despite the headwind of incremental costs to serve our customers during the January labor disruption. Absent these costs, plus the volume headwinds from labor and weather, which altogether totaled approximately $20 million, we estimate that our adjusted EBITDA growth rate over the prior year would have been approximately 12% and adjusted EBITDA margin would have increased approximately 20 basis points. Turning to Slide 11. We increased adjusted EBITDA per case again this quarter despite incurring higher incremental costs related to the labor disruption. Adjusted gross profit per case growth continued at a strong $0.17 improvement over prior year, driven by our cost of goods sold initiative and disciplined pricing. On an…

Thanks, Dirk. Looking ahead, we remain intensely focused on executing our strategy, and we'll maintain our disciplined approach to capital deployment to drive long-term shareholder value. We see tremendous opportunities ahead as we focus on what we can control and continue to deliver on our commitments regardless of the operating environment. Our future is promising, and I am highly confident in our ability to continue to outpace industry growth over the long term and to leverage that growth effectively to the bottom line. Finally, we are excited about our upcoming Investor Day on June 5, where we will share our new long-range plan targets and why we believe we have the right strategy and the best associates in the business to execute that plan. We hope you can join us here at our company headquarters or via the webcast. With that, Krista, please open up the call for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line of Alex Slagle with Jefferies.

I guess a question more on the macro, just high level. I mean in some segments, the management teams of companies we cover ratcheted down their growth expectations because of the softer traffic environment. Just trying to figure out, I mean, has this impacted your internal targets to a certain degree? And maybe you could talk to some of the incremental offsets that you're seeing that allow you to reiterate your outlook?

Yes. So look, I think it's well documented that there have been some foot traffic challenges in the industry. But as I continue to say to you all and I say to our team internally, we have so much opportunity to continue to focus on the things we can control like gaining profitable market share. And look, I couldn't be more pleased or proud of our team on the performance in the first quarter. Obviously, the well-documented weather situation was out there. On top of that, we had a labor disruption that lasted for the majority of the month of January. And still, we outperformed the market, accelerated share gains. And so that is what gives me confidence in our ability to continue to outpace the market growth regardless of what's going on in the world around us. And then secondly, you heard a lot this morning from both me and Dirk about our continued work around self-help, and there's so much of that going on. And again, with all the distraction we had in January, our team's ability to stay focused and put out the productivity numbers that we talked about here this morning just gives me great confidence that, that momentum will continue. We have a strong pipeline of initiatives, as you heard, and we're continuing to stay focused.

Congrats on the progress.

Thanks a lot, Alex.

Your next question comes from the line of John Heinbockel with Guggenheim Securities.

I want to start with -- there's a lot of noise, right, unusual amount of noise in the first quarter. Where do you think the trend line on independent case growth is? I know it was the organic piece, right? So that was 2.9% impacted by weather and strike. Do you think we're 4% to 5%? And wherever we are, is all of that coming from new account growth, right? So penetration for everybody, right, has kind of stalled out. Is that kind of where we are composition-wise?

Yes, I think in that mid-single-digit range, John, kind of as you framed it is probably the right trajectory. We were relatively flattish in January year-over-year, which I thought was a win for the team given the challenges that we had and then it accelerated from there. As we flipped into the second quarter, it's roughly on par with the way we exited the first quarter. And so, yes, the foot traffic is a challenge, but our ability to generate new business is key to our success. Penetration is a challenge just with the foot traffic piece of it, but we also have an opportunity to shore up lost business, which hasn't been a problem for us, but there's always opportunity to do a better job there. So that combination of net new account generation, that difference between new accounts and shoring up the loss is where our team stays focused and, obviously, continue to look for every penetration opportunity we can. You heard me talk this morning about the Pronto Penetration opportunity. That's new for us. We're excited about it to take that offering to our existing customer base. And we think that's going to mean good things on the penetration front as we ramp that up across the company.

I think, John, the other thing that shows through in our first quarter results was our 1.4% organic total case growth, which is sort of faster than the industry and others, is really -- I think it highlights the diverse mix of customers that we have. And so it's about our target customer types in that overall smart, profitable growth.

And maybe the follow-up, right, the -- I think you maybe sized for the first time the 60% of the product base that you've gone through $120 million of savings. So when you think about the next 40%, and I assume that's not as productive as the first 60%, which may be wrong, and then you'll go back around again, so when you think about on a go-forward basis, in aggregate, is there a lot more than $120 million to go over a multiyear period or no, do you think?

Well, I think you're thinking about it right, the 40% won't likely be as large as the 60% just to size that a little bit for you, John. But there is a lot to do going forward. And to your point, around cycling back, I think there'll be existing -- more momentum than we've had on the existing side. And look, the beauty is, in a month, we're going to lay all this out for you at our Investor Day on June 5 and talk about that contribution and where it comes from over the next 3-year time horizon.

Your next question comes from the line of Brian Harbour with Morgan Stanley.

I'm sure we'll talk about this next month, too, but just what's the source of some of the additional kind of cost savings opportunities that you mentioned in your comments, Dave?

Well, 2 I'd point to: one, I commented on and the other one, I didn't. But the work that we've done around replenishment yield is $15 million of expense reduction. That's been an ongoing piece of work. I think there's likely still more to come there as we ramp up technology in that part of the business. And so we're excited about that. The team has worked hard to achieve the numbers that I spoke about. But importantly, also, Brian, you've heard me talk over the course of the last year about shifting our focus and our resource back into the field given the responsibility to the P&L owners and unwinding a bit of the centralization that has been done over the company over a number of years. And with that move back to the field comes efficiency gains. I'm a firm believer that the folks that own the P&L are going to determine whether they need the headcount, whether it's adding value or not. You've seen some of that initially pop out from the work that we've done here, particularly over the last 6 months, and there's likely more to come on that journey as well.

Okay. Just on the health care and hospitality side, too, how quickly do you expect some of this new business to pick up on the hospitality side? Is health care sort of outsized still? Or do you think a similar pace can sustain? How do those pieces sort of factor into your case growth outlook for the year?

Yes. I think let me take hospitality first. We're a little over-indexed in our hospitality mix around lodging. I think that was challenged a bit with same-store sales and foot traffic. Even in spring break, we didn't see the uplift that you normally see. I think there's probably some more international travel that's happened this spring break versus prior years coming out of COVID and things like that going on. But look, we've got line of sight to a very strong pipeline and not just in health care and hospitality, but also in our independent business, and we're in the process of ramping up that business here in the second quarter. And that's what I point to when I shared the confidence in the earlier question about the momentum continuing here, really good progress, lots of momentum, strong pipeline that we expect to convert in the second quarter and beyond here.

Your next question comes from the line of Edward Kelly with Wells Fargo.

Nice quarter in a tough environment.

Thank you.

I wanted to ask you about the spread between gross profit per case and OpEx per case, slightly negative in Q1, which is obviously uncharacteristic for you and there was a strike issue. Maybe [ tease ] out Q1 performance a bit more. And then what I'm really interested in is looking ahead, there's obviously a ton of self-help that you've been talking about, mix benefits, inflation is coming back. Can you just maybe talk about how you see that spread evolving? And what's a realistic target for the remainder of the year?

Ed, this is Dirk. So overall, we do -- I'm not going to give a specific number, but we do expect to continue to have that healthy spread as part of our balanced growth strategy. I think the overall inflation, although it's picked up some, it's still pretty modest at 1.5% for the first quarter. So as you've heard me say a number of times, when it's like that, it's going to be a small contributor, but it's not going to be the key thing you hear us talk about driving the overall growth. I expect continued improvement in GP, expect continued productivity to offset a good portion of inflation. And each of those impacts really come from the things that we're doing within our 4 walls on the different activities and initiatives. But we do continue to expect adjusted EBITDA per case to continue to increase.

Maybe just a quick follow-up. I wanted to ask you about M&A real quick. It looks like you had about a 2.8% benefit in the quarter from M&A. IWC comes in, in Q2, so I guess that's going to ramp. But the guidance, I think, includes a 2% benefit from M&A. So maybe could you just talk about how that's layering in? And then from a pipeline standpoint, like how are you -- you've done a few deals. So how are you thinking about the outlook from here? I did note that it looks like M&A is kind of below share repo on the priority list on that slide, I think.

Sure. Well, Ed, why don't I start with just the overall M&A. And so yes, IWC will come in, so we'll have a couple of months of overlap, but Renzi will roll off later in the second quarter. So it really will be one on, one off over the period and then Saladino's through most of the rest of the year. So I think overall, we expect it to be pretty similar. And I think as Dave talked about with our organic case growth, we're getting past some of the January challenges and some of the things that we talked about in our pipeline, and that's why we feel so good about our -- reiterating our guidance on volume outlook.

Yes. And Ed, on the pipeline, it remains strong. We'll give a little bit more color on that at Investor Day here coming up on June 5. But I will just reinforce a couple of points that I've always said around M&A. First of all, I think it can be an accretive add to the business for the right deals with the right management teams at the right time, but we don't need to do any of them. And so we're not going to force anything, and we're not going to overpay and we haven't in the 3 deals that we've done. And to your point around share repurchases, look, we've done 3 deals here in less than 12 months. We've got some integration work ahead of us. You'll likely see us take a breath around M&A here for a little bit and lean in harder to share repurchases as the year progresses, as we said in the script.

Your next question comes from the line of Jake Bartlett with Truist Securities.

My first is on the channels and the organic growth within them. So you've given overall case growth in independent organic. But how do the acquisitions impact health care, hospitality and chain? And then building on that, chain case growth accelerated pretty meaningfully. If it's not acquisitions, what is driving that pretty strong acceleration? Then I have a follow-up.

So health care and hospitality, the acquisitions had very little impact to either of those from a growth rate perspective. Chains did have a much more significant impact, and that's primarily, as you may remember from our discussions before, around Saladino's which have had a stronger chain base of the business. So we talked about 3.7% overall chain growth, but organic was down around 4%. So very similar to what Black Box indicated for the first quarter, so really not too different from a trend there.

Okay. So you said organic was down 4%, just maybe repeat that?

The [ chain ] is down 4%, which was pretty much right in line where the Black Box data was for the quarter.

Got it. Great. And then my other question was just about the size of your sales force. And I believe you're growing your sales force slower than your 2 largest peers. And so just wondering what your thoughts are on how that might impact your share gains going forward? How much of the share gains do you think has been driven by investments in your sales force? And could that become a headwind as your larger competitors, I believe, are adding to their sales force quicker?

So first of all, I'll take the second part of your question, no, I don't think it will be a headwind at all, Jake. We reiterated last call and I'll say it again, we believe low- to mid-single-digit addition to our sales force on an ongoing basis is the right number. We've got that built into our algorithm and the productivity around that and the time it takes new hires to ramp. I think I'd point to a couple of things maybe relative to others. First of all, our digital platform and the efficiency gains that, that enables for our sales force and the focus it allows them to have on the customer in selling our great products and penetrating that business and, importantly, helping our customers solve problems. So I would point to MOXe and the advent of that as a real productivity help for our sales force. And the other one is our team-based selling, which we've been at longer than others. And for a very long time, that's part and parcel to how we go to market. And that also affords our territory managers with efficiency gains because of the help and support that they get from the specialists and the restaurant operation consultants on a day-to-day basis in front of the customer. So we feel really good about it. I don't think there will be any headwind at all in our ability to drive growth based on our algorithm.

Your next question comes from the line of Kelly Bania with BMO Capital Markets.

Congrats on a good quarter here.

Thank you.

Just wanted to ask, you gave some of the figures here on the Pronto initiatives that were interesting. With the numbers that you disclosed here, I'm assuming this is really impacting independents. Is that initiative kind of driving a low- to mid-single-digit lift for independents? Correct my math if I'm wrong there. But can you just talk a little bit more about how that's working, if that's new accounts, increased wallet share and how that impacts the P&L?

Yes. So first of all, we've been ramping up Pronto over the last 18 to 24 months. And so we've progressively gotten increased benefit and felt like it was time to disclose the importance of that business to our total, and that's why we quantified the $600 million we anticipate this year. But I tried to make that distinction, and let me be clear, up until now, Kelly, Pronto was only focused on attracting new customers. We had not deployed that to our existing customer base until we were confident in the model and we knew that we had all the bugs worked out in that model. And so now when we go to Pronto Penetration, we are offering that to existing customers on their nonstandard routed days. We think that will enable us to continue to penetrate those accounts, give our customers less reason to go to specialty and other suppliers to get their needs met. So we're excited about not only the ability to continue to attract new customers through Pronto, but now importantly, penetrating our existing customers further. So more to come on that, but we're really excited about the model and what it's meant so far and where we can take it.

Great. Can I just add one more? Just on the hospitality, if I missed it, I apologize, but can you just help us understand the magnitude of what you expect in terms of new wins coming on over the course of the year? And also just maybe incorporate what the competition looks like for those contracts, the profitability level of those contracts.

Kelly, so overall, we expect hospitality to meaningfully accelerate sort of some in Q2 and then more in the back half of the year. And that a lot of the -- that comes from really visibility to customers that have started to onboard already here in the second quarter and more that we know are coming. And so those numbers will show up as we go over time. And it's -- the reason that we keep talking a lot about independents, our core key customers highly profitable, but also health care, hospitality and other, is those are all valuable customers that are attractive, profitable. Our differentiation shows up. And so really, our growth in those 3 target types and then opportunistically in other customer types are key to growth, and we're going to continue to be thoughtful. And like I said, that resulted in stronger than the market's Q1 overall growth rates and stronger than overall from a target customer-type perspective.

Your next question comes from the line of Jeffrey Bernstein with Barclays.

My first question, Dave, just on the broader restaurant industry, we've talked about how the macro is a little softer than expected at the start of the year. It seems like it's changed more than independents. But you get a chance to look at all segments. I'm just wondering big picture, to what do you attribute the slowdown? There's been lots of talk about outsized restaurant industry menu pricing may be hurting and the lower-end consumer may be feeling incremental pressure. Just based on your 30,000-foot view, what would you attribute the slowdown? And then I had one follow-up.

Yes. This is why I'm not an economist, Jeff, but I'll give you a perspective, for sure. I think it's more around the challenges that the consumer has, given what's happened around inflation over the past few years, and they're thoughtful about how they spend their disposable income. And so I think that's really driving a lot of the foot traffic challenges we've seen. Certainly, our customers have experienced inflation over the same period of time, and those challenges persist. I really think at the root of it is a consumer issue. I do think -- and I believe this long-term trend will continue. I think independents will win over chains. And I think the foot traffic is certainly reflecting that, not that independents don't have challenges, just the same, they do, but I just think their model is more in line with the big culinary desires and the experiential dining that the consumer is looking for. So we're bullish on independents over the long term. And whatever short-term bumps in the road there may be, we think they're going to win.

Understood. And then just my follow-up is on the broader industry, just the number of doors in America. I feel like through the pandemic, many people talked about losing roughly 10% of the restaurants or at least having them closed. I'm just wondering, where do you think we stand today relative to that peak pre-COVID? Do you buy into that 10% reduction? And where do you think we are now relative to that?

Yes. I think roughly that number is in line, maybe plus or minus, but there's been a strong rebound, obviously, from the pandemic and it has thereof. But I do still think there's -- while it's increased quite a bit, I still think the count total was still down versus pre-pandemic levels, which obviously keeps things very competitive in the industry and [ customers ] increasingly challenged to attract folks into the restaurants, but probably still down a little bit from pre-pandemic levels.

Your next question comes from the line of Mark Carden with UBS.

To start, I wanted to touch on CHEF'STORE. How is this business performing in the current macro backdrop? Have you guys seen demand pick up much just given some of the pressure on the lower end?

Mark, so we have seen CHEF'STORE return to case growth, which has been encouraging. As you remember, we talked about with some of the ERP and related challenges from last year. I would say, so overall, the fact that if the business is back growing, we are encouraged by that. And our focus is to continue to work through and accelerate that growth over time. And we're continuing to add stores with 5 stores planned for this year, and it does play a niche in the overall market for us, especially that customer base that you're talking about as well as fill-ins.

Great. That's helpful. And then just on the labor backdrop, are you guys seeing the impact from California just given the shift to the $20 minimum wage for QSR workers? And really, any related wage pressure that might have caused in the state?

No, not really. Most of our associates are paid well above that, so a pretty limited impact from our perspective. I'd say from an overall customer volume, it's pretty early to tell and really talk much about what that may do to overall demand more broadly.

Your next question comes from the line of Peter Saleh with BTIG.

Congrats on a good quarter. I did want to ask about the increase in the private label penetration. Can you just talk a little bit about what drove that this quarter? And how much of that you think is attributable to the change in the sales force compensation that you indicated, I guess, earlier this year?

Yes. I think, Peter, it's a combination of factors, the compensation being one that I think will be a meaningful one for us going forward. So I'm very excited to see that increase. But as we said, coming out of the pandemic, the manufacturers were challenged to supply those products for us. And it's just really been over the last couple of quarters that we've gotten the confidence of the sales force back to go lean into those products more aggressively than they have over the past few years. And we had a good performance in the fourth quarter. Excited to see us -- our penetration up over 52% in the first quarter. And as I've said before, I don't really see any near-term ceiling for that, and I feel like the momentum will continue to build on our exclusive brands.

And then just on MOXe, you indicated that your customers are buying, I believe, 10% more. But I suspect you have some customers that have been on the platform longer than others. What's the -- is the behavior of customers that have been on it longer, are they buying more? Or is that 10% kind of a good figure to use going forward?

Yes, I think that's roughly a good figure to use going forward. And our goal is to get our customers -- the new customer onto that platform immediately, if not sooner, once we get into the account because of all the things that we've talked about here in terms of benefits both for the customer and for the productivity of our sales force. And so that's why we disclosed that figure. I think that's a solid one to think about going forward.

And your next question comes from Andrew Wolf with CL King.

Just wanted to start with a point of clarification. Dave, I think you said -- or maybe it was Dirk, that cases were flat in January. Just wanted to make sure, was that with reference to independent organic cases or total cases? Just what is the reference point when we think about when to compare the flat January to?

That was specific to independents, that comment. Overall, we did see some stronger case growth just more broadly through the quarter, but that comment was geared to independents.

So it's more like an organic thing, your typical distribution center not impacted by it. Okay. And was it all weather? Or did any of the labor actions also had an effect on January sales?

Yes. As we said, it was a combination of both. That was kind of the net impact in the month of January where we had the labor disruptions for about 3 weeks of the month overlapping the weather challenges that everyone experienced.

Okay. Because I thought it was just -- I wasn't sure. Okay. So it was both monetary impact and the sales impact. Okay. Dave, on the new cases per mile metric, is that purely logistical, it sort of falls out from what you're doing in logistics? Or does it -- can it sort of help drive sales and marketing, let's say, to increase customer density in other ways? Or is it purely logistical and the sales and marketing people are going to do their own thing and not be influenced by this getting the logistics cost down?

Yes. The root of it is we're helping ourselves in terms of efficiency of getting the products to the customer. But importantly, there is a very positive customer impact because as we take miles out of our system to get the products from our distribution centers to the customers, we're more likely to be on time and show up when the customer has requested it. So that -- there's a double benefit there. So it very much impacts the customer in a positive way. And so we're excited about continuing that work.

[Operator Instructions] And your next question comes from the line of Fred Wightman with Wolfe Research.

I wanted to come back to the independent case growth numbers. And if we just go back and look at what you guys disclosed for 2Q from last year, you talked about a softer March and April and then some sequential improvement in May and June. So I'm just wondering how we should think about the net impact of some of these headwinds from 1Q. So the weather and the labor that you just touched on rolling off, but then also facing some of those tougher compares on a monthly basis later in the quarter.

I think as you pointed out, Fred, that the weather and the labor are largely behind us. We have a few of the labor impacted markets that haven't fully recovered as far as lost customers, but that's a minority. And those teams are laser-focused on getting that back. I would say, overall, I'm not going to specifically comment beyond what Dave did where he talked about April volume being pretty similar to March. Our focus as we get to this normalized environment without the weather, without labor, et cetera, is to get back on pace for the strong independent growth that we've generated and continue to take share. As you heard Dave said, we accelerated our share gains in Q1, and we don't expect to slow down on that versus continuing to charge ahead.

Great. And then on Pronto, I think you guys made a comment that that's a $600 million top line contribution currently. Is there a way to size the potential market for the Pronto Penetration? Is that bigger, smaller, sort of in line with the core Pronto offering?

It's early days. We'll have more to say about that through the course of time. We're just -- we're really getting started with that, Fred. And so we're excited about it. We think it's got a large potential, but it is very early days there.

And your next question comes from the line of Rahul Kro with JPMorgan.

It's on Pronto again. Like you guys did mention the ability to compete against specialty and local. Is that mostly because of the delivery window flexibility? And we also saw that many operators succeed here because of the ethnic meats, produce and whatnot. So are you considering adding more SKUs to the offering or you can compete with the current assortment?

I think we've got great product line that falls on right on top of the line of the specialty suppliers. What this gives us, Rahul, is the ability to actually get that product in a more timely fashion to the customers versus our maybe couple deliveries or standard deliveries per week. We can deliver those products every day now with Pronto at whatever frequency the customer needs it. And obviously, delivering it on the smaller trucks gets us into some of the more urban tight areas that are more challenging to take a larger vehicle into. So I think there's good upside there and allows us to compete in a way that we haven't been able to prior to Pronto.

Understood. That's helpful. Is there a sense of how the profit per case is in this -- in these deliveries being very different from what you have? Or is it very comparable on gross profit per case?

It's comparable to overall independent margins. So in this case, there's a -- the customers are willing to pay a slight premium because of the flexibility, which mitigates our slightly increased delivery cost. So it's profitable, it's attractive. And as Dave said, when you pair this up with our larger truck delivery service, it really allows the right service for the right customer.

[Operator Instructions] And with no further questions, I would now like to turn the call back to Mr. Dave Flitman for any additional or closing remarks.

Thank you, Krista, and thanks for joining us today. We're excited about the underlying momentum that the business has and certainly the focus of our 30,000 associates on continuing to drive that momentum. We look forward to seeing many of you at our June 5 Investor Day. Have a great week. Thanks a lot.

And ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's call, and we thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.