Thank you for standing by. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Energy Fuels Annual Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference over to Mark Chalmers, CEO of Energy Fuels. Sir, the floor is yours.

Okay. Well, thank you, Morgan. And again, my name is Mark Chalmers, CEO of Energy Fuels. Thank you for joining the call today to discuss our financial and operational results for year ending December 31, 2025. 2025 was truly a breakout year for Energy Fuels. We achieved numerous operational ramp-up growth milestones, and we believe set the stage for significant future cash flow generation, market differentiation and competitive advantages in the critical materials space. We also believe that we are showing the market that we have the financial, technical, commercial capabilities to execute our aggressive plans. I'm just going to touch on a few highlights. In short, we exceeded guidance on all fronts in 2025. Not many in the uranium space can say that. And we even upgraded our guidance during the course of the year, and we beat that guidance. We mined -- newly mined ore over 1.7 million pounds of uranium, and we processed over 1 million pounds of finished U3O8. And it's important to note that there's a bit of a lead lag between when we mine and we process. So really, the processing has to catch up with the amount of uranium we mine. And we also started ramping up our sales volumes. Looking to 2026, we plan to materially increase uranium mining production and sales. We made remarkable progress on our rare earth segment, including pilot production of dysprosium and soon to be terbium oxides and announced plans to expand our commercial heavy production in mid-2027. Our NdPr and Dy products have been qualified for use by major automobile manufacturers and some of that product has gone into electric vehicles and hybrid vehicles as we speak. We received all government approvals for the development of our Donald joint venture project in Australia. We completed feasibility…

Great. Thank you, Mark. Look, as Mark said, the White Mesa Mill, it's the jewel in the crown of our portfolio. It's the only operating conventional mill for processing uranium, but it's also got the capability of processing commercial quantities of monazite producing meaningful amounts of NdPr. We can -- we have a current capacity of 1,000 tonnes per annum of NdPr, but we can also process samarium concentrates, samarium plus concentrate, so the heavies. We've demonstrated the use of our NdPr in various applications. Most importantly, it's been qualified and validated. It's even in some operating electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles coming out of Asia. So it's an exciting aspect of our business. Late last year, we reported that we produced 29 kilograms of dysprosium oxide, and that's been validated by rare earth permanent magnet manufacturers as well. Next month, we plan to produce our first kilogram of terbium oxide. And then following that, we plan to produce pilot circuits for both samarium, europium as well as gadolinium oxides. Europium as well as gadolinium oxides. So we're doing some incredible things at the White Mesa Mill, and it's a credit to our incredible team that we have on the ground there. This year, we're working on our Phase 1 expansion, and that's going to allow us to produce commercial quantities of both mid and heavy REE oxides. That again includes dysprosium, terbium, samarium, europium and gadolinium. We also could possibly produce yttrium. We're planning to install equipment this year that will allow us to produce and process MREC material, mixed rare earth carbonates. So as you can see, we have not only an incredible facility there, but we have an incredible team of scientists and engineers that are allowing us to do some truly groundbreaking work at the…

Thank you, Ross, and good morning, everyone. I'll start with our balance sheet and liquidity, followed by a discussion of our financial performance for the fiscal year '25. So we ended the year in a very strong financial position as we prepare to develop our long-term projects, finishing with $1.4 billion in total assets. Our working capital was $927 million, which includes $862 million of combined cash and marketable securities with the majority of our marketable securities being excess cash invested in highly liquid interest-bearing securities. This also reflects the $621 million in net proceeds received from the convertible note offering completed at the beginning of the fourth quarter. This liquidity and profile provides substantial flexibility to fund ongoing operations, advance our strategic projects and remain opportunistic as market conditions evolve. Now turning over to the income statement. For the year, we reported a net loss of $86 million or $0.38 per share compared to a net loss of $47 million or $0.28 per share in fiscal 2024. Now this year-over-year increase in net loss was anticipated and primarily reflects higher ongoing costs with the expansion of our global operations following the acquisition of Base Resources in the fourth quarter of 2024 as well as continued investment in our core projects. Specifically, we incurred approximately $15 million higher ongoing SG&A expenses, largely driven by our expanded workforce to support the execution of our global strategy. In addition, exploration and development expenses included an increase of $9 million as we advanced priority projects across our portfolio, including the Juniper Zone at Pinyon Plain, La Sal, Bahia and delineation drilling at Nichols Ranch. It also included an increase of $7 million in noncash write-downs related to changes in tax laws and exploration projects that we're no longer pursuing. Finally, market conditions also…

All right. Thanks, Nate. Look, as I've mentioned earlier, we're really excited that we exceeded guidance for mined uranium, processed uranium and sales of uranium in 2025. And I think it would be very rare for a uranium company to do that. And really, it's because we have experience of producing uranium. It was a transition year for us because we were ramping up back into commercial uranium production, and that kind of leads us into our guidance for 2026. And you can see that our projected guidance for mined uranium is increasing materially from 2 million to a low of 2 million to 2.5 million pounds. And I know that for a lot of time, I've been telling people that our first goal is to get to 2 million pounds of production and then go and increase from there. The processed uranium also increasing materially from 1.5 million pounds to 2.5 million pounds. And that really is just a function of how long we run the White Mesa Mill. I talked about the mill produces about 250,000 pounds per month. So you can see that if we ran for, say, 10 months, we would get to the 2.5 million pounds. And I also highlighted that we did 350,000 pounds in December of 2025. And then on sales pounds, we'll have the ability -- well, we certainly have the ability with the process and finished goods to cover all our contracts and also figure out where we're going to find home for those residual pounds, but we can also keep them in inventory. We can also sell them or go into other long-term contracts. So it is materially changing. Our cost of goods sold is going to decrease as we ramp up the production, and we still are focused on basically using our uranium business to fund a lot of the company's expenditures going forward over the next several years while we build out this world significant critical mineral company. So before we go to questions, I just want to talk a bit about CEO transition. And I just want -- and I'm going to tag team this with Ross. So Ross, you just jump in wherever, but I want to just tell people that, that succession plan is proceeding as expected. We've had this in place over the last couple of years. Ross is anticipated to become the President -- well, he's the President, current President. He's worked with us for 7 months and to become CEO in April, and I will be retiring. But I plan to stay around as a consultant exclusively to help Ross, and I'm excited about that. I'll never really -- I mean, I may be shifting from a full-time role to a consulting role, but I'm not retiring as a professional because I still want to give more, but I also want to spend more time in Australia in the coming years. So Ross, I don't know if you want to add anything.

Yes. Look, I just want to express my gratitude to Mark. He's -- when I look at where this company has come from over the last, well, 10 years, but really over the last couple of years, you think about it being a single product, single jurisdiction sort of company to now very much a global company with over a $5 billion market cap. It's a tremendous credit to Mark and his leadership that we've been able to grow. And we've been able to do it without taking on debt, and we've been able to do it with limited resources to grow this company into a truly world-class company with amazing assets. But the other part of it is the team. Mark has been incredibly successful at putting a team together that has been able to execute to this stage. So it's an exciting company, exciting time, but it's a tremendous credit to Mark and his leadership in getting us to where we are today. So thank you, Mark. Look forward to continuing to work with you.

Yes. Thank you, Ross. And we are building that team out even further. I mean, with our office here in Denver, Lakewood, in Australia, in Perth and some of these operations around the world, we're able to attract some remarkable people to grow with the company. And I can say this that we have an aggressive strategy that we're not slowing down. We're not slowing down. There are not enough hours in the day. People are calling us. People are watching us. I was at the BMO conference in Florida earlier this week. And it is amazing how many people are watching Energy Fuels, and they see the progress we're making. So anyways, I'll stop on that note and open it up for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Brian Lee with Goldman Sachs.

I guess, first off, Mark, we'll miss your leadership, Ross, looking forward to working with you closely going forward. But as you think about the projects and having put them kind of in position to ramp up here over the next few years, kudos to you guys for all the work through this point. I guess the question I had would just be around the time lines. Has anything shifted on your heavy mineral sands projects? I know looking through the decks and you guys have some of the most detailed decks out there, it looks like some of the time lines may have shifted out a little bit. I don't know if that's a more updated view or if that's something that it sounds like you may have expressed earlier this month in an updated corporate deck. But can you just kind of talk about what's happening with the project time lines for the heavy mineral sands projects and if there's any significant drivers of the updated views on kind of maybe pushing out the time lines a smidge?

Yes. Look, the Donald Project is our shovel-ready project. I mean, really, the focus there is coming to a final investment decision on that. We're very, very buoyant that the timing of a shovel-ready project like Donald with the -- particularly the heavies in addition to the lights is really optimal, and it's very important for not just the company, but for the United States of America and the world in general. So yes, it's shifted a little bit, but we're very confident that we're very close to making a decision there. We still got to look at sort of the final numbers and looking at homes for the product that is produced there. Vara Mada, we're still making significant progress with the government. We've had meetings even this week with the Madagascar government. We've been working with the communities and kind of rebranding that project. But we're really taking maybe a little slower in the fact that we want to make sure that, that project has all the -- certainly the permits, but also the social license to operate because it's an exceptional extraordinary project. But we couldn't be more excited about it because it's a game changer in the whole rare earth business. Bahia, we're making progress there with -- coming up with a resource there. And then you got Dubbo now another one in the queue. So Ross, I don't know if you want to add anything to that.

No. Look, I completely agree with what Mark has said. I think Vara Mada maybe slowed down by a quarter with the change in government, but this government, we've met with, as Mark said, this week, and they are -- they seem to be very supportive and recognize the value that a project like that brings to the country. So yes, no, I think we're progressing pretty well on all fronts there, Brian.

Okay. That's great. I appreciate the color. And then I guess in terms of timing, Donald, like you said, is shovel-ready. It doesn't sound like anything is really shifting out there. So is the time line still for FID here in the early part of '26 and then deliveries in late '27. Any kind of updated thoughts around the time line for getting volume out of that project?

Yes, that's still the time line. And as we said, it's a very important first major step for us in the rare earth space. And to put it into context that the expected heavies from the Donald project is equivalent to about 25% of the U.S. requirements, and that's the first phase. And the second phase could be up to 50% of the heavies required for the United States. So yes, we're on that time line. We've been doing things behind the scenes to make sure that we can maintain that time line. But we've got to just look at the final numbers and make a decision at Board level on how we proceed.

Okay. Great. Last one for me, and I'll pass it on. Mark, you mentioned you've obviously got a very unique asset, and you just alluded to the fact that you could represent a significant percentage of the heavies for the U.S. With Project Vault having been officially announced recently, what have your discussions with your government contacts? How have they evolved? Sort of where do you sit in the positioning of potentially having some sort of government support or offtake given that heavies exposure in your asset mix?

Look, everyone in the critical minerals space is spending a lot of time in D.C. and -- including Energy Fuels, I can't go into too much detail. But I can say one thing. When people look at the number of assets that we've acquired and how we're advancing, it's getting noticed by everyone, everyone around the world, end users, upstream, downstream, midstream and with the Australian government and the U.S. government. So I mean, I think that the differentiator for us is the quantum and scale of what we put together. I mean, I think a lot of people are used to small little fragments in the business, and we don't have fragments. When you look at the potential acquisition of ASM with up through alloys and you look at the multiple projects, it's just -- it's a good look for the right reasons. Let's leave it at that. And Ross, I don't know if you have anything to add.

No, I think -- well, I would just say that I think -- yes, we -- the attraction for us is that we have a real facility. We have the White Mesa Mill that you can go out, you can see. We have bags of NdPr that are sitting there. We have monazite on the ground there. We are for real. And I think that's caught the attention of a lot of people. And so we're hoping that we'll continue to progress in that area. But no -- nothing definitive on that end yet, Brian.

Yes. One other comment, Brian, but it's not just the rare earths. People are looking at our uranium production and our vanadium production. So there really isn't anybody else that they can compare to that has this multi-element Really, everything we're doing is in the wheelhouse of the U.S. government and these OEMs and stuff in terms of how to re-shore some of these elements and final products. So yes, we're in a good spot, I think.

Your next question comes from Anthony Taglieri with Canaccord Genuity.

Maybe starting at White Mesa. Given your uranium production guidance of 1.5 million to 2.5 million pounds, what factors sort of drive the potential high end of that range, maybe producing for 10 months versus the low end, around 6 months? And if you process uranium for 10 months in 2026, would you still switch over back to uranium in Q1 '27? Or could this be pushed back a bit?

Yes. The -- it's really a function of the run time of the mill. And we also have to be mining fast, too, because the mill is very hungry. When we're doing a uranium run, we really don't want to switch the mill on and off very much because once it gets to equilibrium, it perpetuates, and you get the efficiencies of just continuous operations. So I mean, one of the things that we've -- and we've talked about the Phase 1 -- we have what we call Phase 1b and Phase 1c that will allow us to commercially produce both the lights and heavies in 2027. So we've always given ourselves some flexibility that we can shift the mill to rare earth run if need be. And we're trying to -- well, we are showing the world that we have that flexibility. So I would say it's really a function of the critical mass and maximizing the economics of running longer if required. So we're just giving ourselves some maneuvering room there in that regard.

Okay. Great. Understood. Maybe switching gears a bit. So with your '26 uranium sales guidance, there's obviously some room there for some spot sales. We all know where spot prices are right now, around $87, $88 a pound. Are we at levels where you guys would consider selling more into the spot market? Or do you want to see prices reach a certain threshold before you do that? Could the decision to sell more or less on the spot market be tied to a potential strategic uranium reserve? We talked about Project Vault earlier. Maybe some color there would be great.

Yes. I mean we certainly don't want to sell a significant amount of uranium at low prices on the spot, and we really haven't. I mean if the prices go low, we're a buyer. Prices go high, that helps us with our contract pricing because of the formulas in 5 out of the 6 contracts that we have. And so we always want to try to time spot sales when it makes the most sense. So we have sold a bit under $80, like $77, $70, a little bit here and there, but we're always targeting higher prices. So right now, I still believe that the true replacement value on a pound of uranium is still in excess of where the spot is right now, and we always keep that in mind if we do make a sale. But I also think that companies need to show they're building the revenue and they're moving towards profitability. And so we're not just going to not sell uranium just because we're not happy with the price. If we've got a margin on it and we do have a material margin, when you look at our production cost, we want to keep growing our revenue, our profitability and reducing the burn as we build out the rest of our strategy. So -- and we're in a unique position with the ability to use this uranium business to provide a material bridge for the next few years.

Yes. I would just add, when you look at the long-term supply and demand fundamentals, you can't help but be pretty bullish on uranium. And so we're trying to maintain good optionality between our spot and our term contracts that give us that optionality to play it if it does go stronger like we think it will.

Your next question comes from Heiko Ihle with H.C. Wainwright.

Mark, congratulations on your retirement and on that same token, Ross, congratulations on your appointment here. Mark has done a wonderful job with the firm. Ross, I actually just looked this morning, and we initiated coverage of the company on June 29, 2015, with a $6.30 price target. So that's 10.5 years ago.

We've come a long way, fantastic.

Shows you where we've come. I was a little bit hesitant to ask this question on a public call, but I just can't help myself. The firm has changed so much since then. And presumably, with the near-term appointment of you, some changes will be in the air. And I assume that most of these changes are going to be minor given how well the old company "has done." But do you want to just give us a touch of color on your expectations for the company going forward, maybe things that are not as obvious in press releases or in guidance or anything along the lines of that you think you're going to bring your expertise and maybe change things around just a touch?

I'm letting Ross answer that question.

Yes, it's a great question. And look, when you look at our growth plans, they're pretty ambitious. We're going to have 4 major construction projects going on simultaneously. So I think the key is we're going to have some significant additions to the team that are around execution in multiple geographies. So it's really setting the company up for execution success with some very diverse geographically and commodity projects. So it's all about execution going forward and ensuring that we have the right additions to the team.

Fair. And then just on guidance, and you sort of hinted at this in the prepared remarks. You're building off of a good year. But I mean, the 2.5 million pounds, can you go through some of the factors that could get you all the way to 2.5 million? You mentioned earlier in the prepared remarks that it's obviously dependent on the mill. But besides that, anything that we should be looking out for in our models, please?

Look, I think it's -- we're getting Pinyon Plain into more of a routine when it comes to the mining rate. So we're very confident that we can be in that range or even beat it potentially. And the same thing is happening at La Sal. We've got miners and trained a lot of miners because one of our impediments was getting miners that know how to mine conventionally. So -- but at the same time, we'll have Whirlwind. We're planning to do more work to get it back up and into production. Actually, first time, it's never been in production in 2026, it'd be in 2027. The same thing with Energy Queen. We're still doing drilling and looking at when to start up Nichols Ranch in Wyoming. So it's really with the conventional mining, it's really about having more work areas, more miners, and we can ramp up accordingly. So it's pretty low risk for us right now when it comes to getting there. And also what you're seeing, Heiko, is that we're mining more than we typically plan to either process or sell. So we plan to be building inventories that are quite material. And those inventories, particularly the unprocessed uranium, can be turned into finished goods pretty quickly with the mill restart or if the mill is running at the time. So we have a lot of flexibility that others won't have, and we plan to use that to its fullest.

Your next question comes from Noel Parks with Tuohy Brothers Investment Research.

I just had a couple of things. The additional oxides you're going to be pursuing in Phase 1 that you announced last night, is it -- is that essentially sort of the Phase 1c that you've been mentioning late last year?

Yes. I mean one of the things that we're doing with our Phase 1, which is the existing constructed and operable rare earth SX circuit is we're adding what we call 1b. And I know it gets a little confusing because we got a lot of Phase 1s and 2s and -- but we've got Phase Ibs and cs. So the Phase 1b is to allow us to take the SM+, which is samarium plus is really heavy concentrate and go ahead and separate out the Dy, Tb, and some of these other rare earths as well. And so we see that as a real differentiator to have a commercial plant in the United States and have it quicker, faster than others. The 1c really kind of emerged last year, mid-late last year, and it is really focused on being able to take IMREC. And that is sort of an intermediate product that could come from either other cracked and leached monazite, but it also could come from potentially ionic clays or other sources, which will allow us to maximize the usage of that Phase 1 infrastructure for the rare earths, both for lights and heavies with 1b for the heavy separation and 1c for an IMREC. So it's really giving significant flexibility quicker, faster. And when we talk to people, whether it's the OEMs or government agencies, they want fast. And 1b, 1c is something that we see as fast and quick. Now looking to Phase 2, which should be approved in '27 and going into construction '27 with the FID decision, that will be scaled up about 5x greater and will be the more permanent facility, even though we're planning to continue to have that 1b and 1c for the long haul.

Great. And I just wanted to ask about the progress with -- or toward closing of ASM. And any updates you can give on that? And I was wondering, do you need specific South Korean regulatory approval for the plant there? And also -- I mean, for the sale of the plant there. And also, just wondering if you have any ballpark on the capital requirements for the future phases of the Korea plant.

I'll answer some of it, but also have Ross jump in. We have a scheme document that we're executing that was signed by ASM. And again, we're planning to close June of this year. We have to get the FIRB approval, which is Foreign Investment Review Board in Australia. We had to do the same thing for Base Resources. So the good news is we've gone through the scheme process recently in Australia. We still got to get shareholder vote. We've got to get all the various other approvals in the jurisdictions that they have assets in. So we're advancing that. Ross, do you want to add on things like capital or approvals?

So yes, I should have mentioned this Phase 2 is already funded for ASM. So that's adding the 18 different additional furnaces and the additional strip caster. So that is already budgeted and funded. Yes. And then going forward, if we do Phase 3, we don't have numbers around that just yet, but they're relatively modest numbers. I think the key time line, as Mark mentioned, is really getting the FIRB approval and the scheme document approved by the shareholders in Australia. So it's something we've done recently with the base acquisition, and I think we're pretty familiar with the process there.

Your next question comes from Joseph Reagor with ROTH Capital Partners.

I think most of them might have already been answered, but a couple of small things. I guess on the uranium sales guidance, what's the breakdown there between existing contracts and spot sales for this year? And then if you guys can give any color on what we should expect for pricing either over the remaining, call it, 3.5 million pounds you have under contract or just for 2026 for those contract pounds?

Yes. Look, at this one, I'm going to flip to Curtis because he's on the call here, and he's in charge of our uranium sales. But go ahead, Curtis.

Sure. Glad to hear from you. So we have -- this year, I believe the number was about 650,000 to 880,000 pounds of total contract sales of which we've already done some here in Q1. So that's the number. And that range, we offered some flex on those contracts. These were some of our first contracts that we signed back in 2022 that -- where we had to offer some flex in order to get those contracts in place. But keeping in mind as well as those contracts enable us to get the Pinyon Plain Mine going, which, of course, is the largest, lowest cost mine in the United States today. So yes, the rest would theoretically be on spot, midterm, maybe there's -- sold on the forward price curve or something like that this year. And again, we're not going to -- if the price drops, as Mark said, we're probably going to be buyers of uranium to help replenish inventories. But I'd say we're likely to be price-sensitive sellers.

Okay. And can you give any color on what the contract pricing is kind of set around either for this year or if you are more comfortable just over the remainder of the book?

Yes. We haven't put any guidance out on that. If you look at our contract pricing from the last couple of years, that's a pretty good indication of where the prices are for our first sort of tranche of contracts. We have 3 contracts, 3 were signed kind of in early to mid-2022. And we got a little better pricing on those contracts than what was reported at the time, but they weren't high-priced contracts. And the base and the fixed price component on those contracts, they're hybrid contracts, it has been escalating with inflation. But then we've signed 3 more contracts here in the last 18 months or so, which obviously has some higher prices. And so we still have those 2022 contracts that we're delivering into this year. But we also have -- I believe it's one of the more recent contracts that has deliveries this year. So I think you're going to probably hopefully see our contract pricing increase throughout the year, though Q1 is likely to have a little lower because that's when we had, again, one of our other 2022 contracts come into place. And so we made a delivery there, but that one will be done for the year. So you'll see Q1 come out, but then it will probably start going up pretty significantly after that.

But I will say this, it will be in the $70s plus, okay? And depending on how uranium prices are, it can go into the $80s. So -- but it's not in the $60s, Joe. A lot of people have $60s, and we're not in the $60s.

Okay. That's very helpful. And then -- you guys also provided updated reserves and resources with the K. It looks like numbers went up a little bit. Can you kind of talk through what some of the gains were from? Was there some just stuff that came into resource because of higher pricing or any other revisions? I know Pinyon was a big part of it, but just overall.

Yes. I don't have my geologists here. He's in transit on a plane, I think. But looking on Pinyon, when you look at Pinyon originally, and that's -- at least right now, that's the one that's generating cash flow. The original estimate on the -- what we call the upper zone main zone was like 1.6 million pounds in this most recent estimate, they increased that two, threefold greater on the main zone. And it's really hard. And what's interesting is that main zone that the SLR did the estimate on was the most drilled-out zone I've ever seen in my entire career, and they were off by an order of 2 or 3 or greater. So it's hard to really get what I can say -- I believe is accurate estimates, particularly in the Juniper zone. But -- so what we're seeing is we saw the substantial increase in the main zone, substantial grade. The grade was almost double. So that was one of the reasons that it was off so much as the grade was higher. And in the Juniper, we have an area in the Juniper, which is 600 feet, and we're currently mining the top 200 feet, which is above that. So there's 800 feet of total area to mine. And I see a lot of exploration potential in the Juniper Zone. We already know that we have some very, very high-grade intercepts in the Juniper Zone, but it doesn't have a lot of drilling, particularly 200, 300 feet below the Juniper Zone. It's very open ended. So it's going to be kind of work in progress. I've worked at a couple of mines over my career that had 1 year of resource or reserve, and it just went and went and went. We know that Pinyon Plain isn't going to go for 20 years, but I'm still very optimistic it's going to go for a number of years and going to really materially keep our costs very low because of the grades.

Your next question comes from Matthew Key with Texas Capital.

I wanted to drill down a little bit on the 2026 guide on mined U3O8. I was wondering if you could provide maybe an asset breakdown on that total, particularly as it relates to Pinyon Plain. Should we be expecting a similar run rate in 2026 that we saw in late 2025? Obviously, that mix would be important just as we kind of model out costs. So just trying to get a sense of the breakdown there.

Yes. Look, we're pretty comfortable with Pinyon Plain on its own will do at least 2 million pounds plus just as Pinyon Plain. And so the residual of that would be made up from the La Sal Complex, which is currently 2 mines. And so we do have another mine at La Sal that we're looking at refurbishing and startup, and then we have the Whirlwind mine. So the bulk of the pounds are coming from Pinyon Plain. But it's also interesting to note that the La Sal Complex, right now, all we're doing is recovering the uranium. We're not recovering the vanadium. And the vanadium is about 5x the grade of the uranium. And if the price of vanadium keeps going up, we may start talking about recovering the vanadium and getting another byproduct that drives our costs down even further on the La Sal Complex in our uranium vanadium mine. So what I think you can see is that we're comfortable with that range with probably Pinyon being around 2 million plus and the La Sal Complex topping that up. And then you can see that with Energy Queen, Whirlwind and even Nichols Ranch, you can see we're -- it's really quite possible we can get up towards 3 million pounds if we elect to. And again, this is 3 million pounds with limited capital. We don't need a lot of capital. We need basically working capital to get there. But you could also -- if the price of vanadium starts continues to increase, you could see us getting a credit for vanadium production as well, which can drive costs down a lot because it's significant when the price is up.

Got it. No, that's super helpful. And I just wanted to talk a little bit about the medium-term projects there as well. What market signals would you need to see to make that go-ahead decision on Nichols Ranch and Whirlwind? Would you say it's likely those assets come online sometime in 2027? And if you could just remind me just at a high level, the CapEx requirements to kind of bring online those medium-term uranium projects.

Yes. I think it's very high probability in 2027 that Whirlwind comes on as well, Energy Queen and really depending on uranium prices, Nichols Ranch. So I mean, the capital cost, I mean, if you look at Whirlwind and you look at Energy Queen, I mean, it's like $5 million, $10 million each. It's very, very small. When you look at Nichols Ranch, it's really about putting in the well fields and you're probably talking $25 million or something and thereabouts for Nichols Ranch. And most of that capital is going into the well fields, which is really the mining process, okay? So you put that -- those wells in and then you extract the uranium. So between all 3 of them, it's really small compared to others. And -- but I do think very high probability that a couple more conventional mines come on and Nichols Ranch, I think, is a very good probability it could come on in 2027.

This concludes the question-and-answer session. I will now turn the conference back over to Mark Chalmers for any closing remarks.

No, thank you, everyone, who are listening in and asked questions. I think in closing, we've -- and I've always said this that we've had an aggressive but not reckless strategy. We want to keep a strong balance sheet. We need good people to advance the strategy. We're working on that. And we're really getting a lot of attention globally. And it's really been a pleasure to be a part of this over the last 10 years. I plan to continue to be available to work with Ross and the others because I've spent a fair amount of time with a lot of these assets over the years. But I'm really excited and there's more to come. There is so much going on. I don't want investors to think like we've reached some peak because we're still driving this company to become a $10 billion-plus company. And I'm just looking forward to not working 7 days a week and having a little bit more time to have more fun, to go skiing, to spend time with my grandkids and family and friends, which over the last 10 years has been a little bit short of supply. So Ross, do you want to say anything else to that or...

Well, again, I'd just reiterate that Mark is going to be on a 2-year contract going forward, and I fully intend to utilize his expertise. He brings such an incredible wealth of knowledge. But look, the company is set up for just incredible success, incredible continued growth. To Mark's point, we have a lot of exciting things on our plate right now. And yes, excited for the future of this company.

Thank you everybody.

This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect and have a wonderful rest of your day.