Good afternoon, and welcome to the Veeco Instruments Q3 2023 Earnings Call. Today's conference is being recorded Now at this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Anthony Pappone, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, and good afternoon, everyone. Joining me on the call today are Bill Miller, Veeco's Chief Executive Officer; and John Kiernan, our Chief Financial Officer. Today's earnings release is available on the Veeco website. Please note that we have prepared a slide presentation to accompany today's webcast. We encourage you to follow along with the slides on veeco.com. This call is being recorded by Veeco Instruments and is copyrighted material. It cannot be recorded or rebroadcast without Veeco's express permission. Your participation implies consent to our recording. To the extent that this call discusses expectations about market conditions, market acceptance and future sales of the company's products, future disclosures, future earnings expectations or otherwise make statements about the future, such statements are forward-looking and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the statements made. These factors are discussed in the business description, management's discussion and analysis and Risk Factors sections of the company's report on Form 10-K and annual report to shareholders and in our subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and press releases. Veeco does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, including those made on this call, to reflect future events or circumstances after the date of such statements. During this call, management will address non-GAAP financial measures. Information regarding such non-GAAP financial measures, including reconciliation to GAAP measures of performance, is available on our website. With that, I will turn the call over to our CEO, Bill Miller.

Thank you, Anthony. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining our call today. Today I'll take you through our third quarter highlights, provide an update on our markets and discuss a few significant growth opportunities in more detail. John will provide a financial update and guidance, and then we'll be happy to take questions. Veeco reported another quarter of strong top and bottom line results. Revenue totaled $177 million and non-GAAP EPS of $0.53, each above the high end of our guidance range. Our solid financial results were driven by continued strength in our semiconductor business and sequential growth in our data storage business. In addition to our strong results, we're also excited to share several key business wins. First, we ship multiple laser annealing systems to our leading Tier 1 logic and memory customers. Second, we received our first laser annealing system order for a new application to serve the automotive market. Third, we received our first low defect density iron beam deposition system order for a new EUV pellicle mask blank application, and we continue to make progress with our nanosecond annealing and ion beam deposition products for wafer level semiconductor manufacturing. As you may have seen in our press release today, Veeco announced the shipment of our first nanosecond annealing evaluation system to a Tier 1 logic customer representing a substantial milestone for our company. Further advancement of our laser annealing roadmap is an exciting piece of our strategy. I'll discuss this significant opportunity [technical difficulty]. Veeco's laser annealing technology is growing in criticality at our customer's most advanced nodes as traditional technology struggle to meet performance requirements. For example, new gate all-around architectures and shrinking devices require precise higher temperature annealing technology to increase performance and minimize damage. In comparison to traditional lamp approaches, our…

Thanks Bill, and good afternoon, everyone. Today I will be discussing non-GAAP financial data and would encourage you to refer to our reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP results, which you can find in our press release and at the end of the quarterly earnings presentation. Starting with Q3 revenue by market and geography. Revenue for the quarter was $177 million, increasing 10% from Q2. After a record in Q2, revenue from our semiconductor business came in at $98 million comprising 56% of total revenue. In the compound semiconductor market, revenue came in at 14% declining from the prior quarter. Revenue to our data storage customers increased to $34 million during the quarter, representing 19% of revenue as compared to 9% in Q2. And scientific and other meet up 11% of revenue. Now turning to quarterly revenue by region. Revenue from the United States totaled 33% of revenue, an increase from 22% in the prior quarter due to an increase in shipments to data storage customers. Revenue from our Asia-Pacific region declined to 29% of total revenue as compared to 36% in the prior quarter, resulting from a decline in semiconductor sales. As forecasted, the percentage of total revenue from China decreased from 31% in the prior quarter to 23%. We expect an increase in China revenue in Q4 and expect full year revenue from China to be in the low 30% range. And lastly, EMEA was 15% of revenue, an increase from 11% in the prior quarter. Switching gears to our non-GAAP quarterly results. Gross margin came in at approximately 44%, a sequential increase from approximately 43%. Gross margin was positively impacted by higher volume and a more favorable product mix. Operating expenses came in at $46 million in line with guidance as we maintain our focus on cost management,…

Thank you, John. Before concluding our prepared remarks, I'd like to highlight why Veeco is a compelling investment opportunity. We see significant growth opportunities for Veeco in the coming years, and we're investing to take full advantage of these opportunities. Our successful evaluation program has been foundational to our growth in the semiconductor market and is a top priority for 2024. Likewise, we expect our strategic R&D investments in the semiconductor and compound semiconductor markets to further strengthen our unique portfolio of differentiated technologies. As a reminder, our laser annealing technology is well established and our efforts to expand our footprint to new markets, applications and products are gaining traction. We're particularly excited for the opportunity to expand our served available market to new applications as we advance our laser annealing roadmap to nanosecond annealing. In iron beam deposition, our decades of experience and core technology give us confidence as we introduce iron beam for wafer level advanced node semiconductor applications. We believe our iron beam deposition technology has unique advantages versus traditional technologies like PVD, and our team is laser focused on executing. Lastly, we have a long-term opportunity to capitalize on growing demand in the compound semiconductor equipment market for power electronics and photonics applications. And with that, we'll be happy to take your questions. Operator, please open the line.

Thank you. We will now be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. Our first question comes on the line of Charles Shi with Needham. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, thanks for taking my question. Good afternoon, Bill and John. Maybe the first question about that NSA tool you guys shipped out to the Tier 1 customer. Kind of curious, because you mentioned you were expecting maybe repeat orders as early as late 2024, 2025. That seems to be a quite quick turnaround from the first -- from a shipment of a turnaround, but the eval tool to like repeat buys. Can you provide a little bit of context behind the adoption of this -- I mean the adoption of these tools or maybe the evaluation tool here? Is it the dropping, replacing some existing application and why you are expecting such a rapid turnaround from the shipment to the repeat buys? Thanks.

Yeah. Charles, that's a thoughtful, lengthy question there. I would say we are really excited about the shipment of this first evaluation system to a Tier 1 logic customer. I believe it represents a significant milestone for the company to introduce this technology after working on it for a number of years. I think it's important for our investors to understand that this is really a complimentary technology to our existing laser annealing technology. And effectively we can reduce the thermal budget significantly because we have about a 1000 times less dwell time, which opens up a new class of applications that we can compete for. And then I think just to follow up on one of your first sub-questions here, what we have done is we've shipped a system to a logic customer, and these are one year evaluations. And they usually start after the tool is installed. And so let's say we've shipped it now and we could have it installed by the beginning of the year, that would start the clock on the evaluation cycle. If this goes well and the integration runs smoothly, it would not be unheard of for us to receive an order before the evaluation is signed off. But you are right. First orders could be in 2025 very easily as well. So hopefully that that provides the clarity you're looking for.

Yeah. So maybe the second question, I want to ask you to provide a little bit more color on your new application wing for EUV pellicles. Also kind of curious, what do you think about the timing for you to receive high volume manufacturing orders? Is it something that's more tied to the high-end EUV adoption? Or do you -- from your discussion with your customers, do you kind of expect maybe it can be earlier? That's my second question. Thanks.

I would say, Charles, that pellicles are being introduced today. And just for our investors, pellicles, as you know, are a thin, transparent membrane that's mounted on the photo mask to improve yield and reduce defects. So this is a new application for us. Our traditional IBD iron beam deposition, low defect density tool, the industry needs one of these for every three to five ASML scanners shipped. So we're still sizing that market at three to five systems per year as a function of ASML scanner shipped. So we see this as an incremental opportunity. And our thought is this first tool will be used to make production pellicles over in due time.

So, just a slight clarification. One of our EUV tools for every 10 to 15 ASML scanners that are shipped into the market, which then turns into a three to five system requirement for us.

Yeah. Sorry, John. I just really want to follow up onto that, because it sounded like you are expecting pellicles to be introduced today with today's standard EUV tools, not just -- not the heightened EUV tools that maybe just a few years, still a few years down the road. Is that a fair statement?

I don't want to go into too much detail. My understanding is for a small number of EUV mask steps, pellicles are being introduced. I wouldn't want to really hypothesize what that percentage goes to with high NA.

Thanks.

Thank you, Charles.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Brian Lee with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, guys. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions. I had two. I guess the first one on the data storage segment. I know you guys have been talking about in recent quarters, you have enough backlog breadth to kind of support revenues. You had a nice quarter here as well. Can you kind of give us a sense of where you think the data storage cycle is today? And as you think about -- you gave a little bit of a preliminary view here in the Q1, is the backlog extending all the way into Q1? And then kind of maybe beyond that, what should we be thinking about in terms of that business segment for you as we move into next year? And then I had a follow up.

Brian, I would say the data storage industry conditions kind of remain challenging. There's still an excess inventory across the channel that the industry is trying to work off. We have heard commentary from two of our public company customers, talking about maybe early stages of recovery, but clearly we would have -- they would have to see that for some time before we can call it a sustained bottom. I would say, the one thing of interest when I look longer term, both of our customers do project exabyte growth over the next three to five years at about 25% CAGR. And clearly that would be very good, a good tailwind for Veeco. And so your specific question on our view towards 2024, I would say, we're not going to really be able to give quantitative view of 2024, but I would suffice it to say that we do have backlog into 2024 and wouldn't think it would be substantially different from 2023. But we will give more color here in the near future.

Okay. Fair enough. That's helpful. And then, you kind of headed it off as well with your prepared remarks, but as you think about the China exposure, I know there's been incremental concerns across different markets and industries with respect to the China macro and signs of weakness in industrial and maybe some other categories. Can you kind of maybe level set us? I know you're giving us sort of the real time updates around where your exposure is and how you're navigating it, but what are you hearing on the ground there and are you anticipating as you look into 2024? Maybe a similar question, like, should we expect that China continues to fall as a percent of sales that you're making elsewhere and other geos and other end markets? Or do you see some stabilization here as you think about that preliminary view you gave out into Q1? Thank you.

Sure. Sure, Brian, I'll take that. This is John. So we had strong revenue in the first half of this year in China, and we had indicated that we would see China as a percentage of our overall revenue, not as high as the first half of the year. But that being said, is that we were also forecasting about 30% of our revenue coming from China this year. We continue to see that. So we will see a bit of a pickup in the fourth quarter compared to third quarter for our business in China. I think as we look into 2024 at this point in time, it's a bit early and we're not really ready to call. Do we see that business at -- what business levels that we expect to see there for full year 2024. But what I can comment on is that, the current activity with our customers is still pretty strong. We do see ongoing demand for China customers. We are aware that customers are continuing to make investments in several areas for mature nodes. So at this point in time, we still see a pretty good environment for business with our China customers.

Okay. Fair enough. Thanks guys. I'll pass it on.

Thanks Brian.

Thank you, Brian.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Tom O’Malley with Barclays. Please proceed with your question. Thomas O’Malley: Hey, I just wanted to follow up again on the China question there. So depending on what you guys are defining as low thirties for the entire year, you could have China revenue in the fourth quarter near record levels. Could you just describe where that's coming from? Is that in the semi business, I know you're guiding that up for 10% on the year or so, so are you seeing the mix in your semi business move back towards majority of that revenue being in China, or just any comments on that into the fourth quarter would be helpful?

Yeah. Tom, I think that's a, a good question there. So our expectations for where we expect it to be in the second half of the year is holding out, just on scheduled delivery dates. We had more scheduled deliveries in Q4 for these customers than Q3. So I don't really think it's really a change in the demand. There just so happened on how the systems were scheduled to be shipped. So yeah, we expect in the high 30% range of revenue in the fourth quarter coming from customers in China. Thomas O’Malley: Got it. And just as a follow up to that one, is that all coming from the trailing edge? Could you just describe maybe the disparity? Is it a little more leading edge than it was before? Has there been any change in ordering patterns there? Just trying to figure out where that demand's coming from.

Yeah. So no change in the pattern there, Tom. What we've seen this year is as revenue increase to about 30% of revenue coming from China and over the past couple years is about 20% of the company's revenue. It's principally been in our laser annealing product line, is where the growth has been coming from. And that's where we see that continuing into the fourth quarter and into the beginning of next year. Thomas O’Malley: Gotcha. And just one more quick one, if I could sneak it in. So you guys said Q1, your expectations, I think the exact words you used were similar revenue rates to Q3 and Q4. There's obviously a big disparity be between the September and December. Are you kind of saying split the difference for March? And if you could just give any color on -- if you guys have any outlook that backs up that better than expected or at least that flattish guide into March, that'd be helpful. Thank you.

Yeah. I think looking at the average, Tom, we did get over the high end of our guidance, revenue range in Q3. We shipped one or two more systems. So -- but for the whole second half of the year, we're at a number where we expected. We were expecting growth in revenue in the second half of the year. So yeah, I think that's the right way to look at it. Look at the average of Q3 and Q4 and our commentary would be mean, like sort of in the middle there. That's what our expectation would be at this point somewhere of a similar range in Q1 of 2024. Thomas O’Malley: Thank you very much guys.

You're welcome, Tom.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Gus Richard with Northland Capital. Please proceed with your question.

Yes. Thanks for taking the questions. Bill, I think on your commentary, you talked about semis being up 10% year-on-year. And if I just plug in the number for Q4, you kind of got to do $111 million, $112 million to hit 10%. Am I doing the math right there?

Yeah. So Gus, this is John. Yeah. We expect full year semiconductor revenue at the midpoint of our guide to be somewhere around $405 million for the year. That's up roughly 10%. So Q4 revenue numbers should be around $105 million in that range at the midpoint of our guide. So I think you're in the right zip code there.

Okay. Got it. And then, just shifting back to the EUV mask, I'm sorry, EUV blank -- mask blank opportunity and pellicles, just a couple of questions. First of all, is the pellicle customer the fabs, or is it the blank manufacturers? And then as you go to high-end a high NA EUV, you go to like a six by -- six-inch by nine-inch substrate. Is that going to require just a different set of tools when we go, you have to do some modification, the existing tools to accommodate that larger substrate?

I would -- to answer the first part of your question, I would say, this tool we sold for pellicles is not to our traditional mask blank customers. And then I would say, moving to high NA with the larger format size, we are engaging with the industry to be prepared for that on the EUV mask blank deposition equipment. So we are working on that as well.

Okay. And -- okay. I'll take my question -- the rest of them offline. Thank you.

Thank you, Gus.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Rick Schafer with Oppenheimer. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, this is Way Malcolm [ph] on the line for Rick. Thanks for taking the questions and congrats on the results and shipping the first NSA tool. My first question is on customer order patterns. Did you see any customer expedite orders for 3Q? Was there anything that was pulled from 4Q into 3Q?

My first inclination is no. We did over ship a little bit, but I don't think it was anything related to me, any related pull in at the system level. Maybe some upgrades are part in the like, but I don’t know, John, any more color there?

No. I think if you looked at the high-end of our guide range that we gave that it had a couple of more systems in the high-end of the guide range, and essentially that's what we shipped out. During the quarter was the biggest things that drove the revenue for the quarter, but not a new order activity. It was something that was already in that backlog and scheduled towards either the end of Q3 or the beginning of Q4.

Got It.

Just excuse me, I'll add that. I think our on time delivery for systems was, if not 100%, extremely close to 100%. So our factories were getting closer to on time.

Great. Thank you. Appreciate that. My second question is on the NSA system, it looks like things are moving rapidly in the space. So was wondering if you can help us better understand this opportunity as it relates to LSA. Has there been more of a customer shift of interest from LSA to NSA and -- or do you see NSA as a separate green field opportunity? Or do you see NSA taking some share from LSA?

I would say NSA is a really complimentary, incremental served available market opportunity for us in both logic and memory. I would say, if I were to look like today, our LSA served available market is totals about $500 million, $400 million in logic and about $100 million in memory. I would say if I were to click forward to 2027, I would say probably two-thirds of our business will be in LSA, our traditional LSA. We're actually planning to put evals out in the field for customers' next node roadmap. So it's clearly an active product and about one-third from nanosecond annealing. And so we're right now sizing the 27 market at $600 million in laser annealing and about $300 million in this incremental NSA business, both kind of equally split between logic and memory.

Appreciate it. Thank you.

Thank you, Way.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Dave Duley with Steelhead Securities. Please proceed with your question.

Yeah. Thanks for taking my question and thanks for giving us the assortment of helpful information here. I guess, first off on, you mentioned that you were seeing potential for evaluation systems to be shipped into a second high bandwidth memory customer. Could you just remind us how big the high bandwidth memory opportunity or TAM is now, and how much bigger it might be with another customer? And if you had to guess when you might see production systems to customer number two, when might -- when that might be?

Yeah. So we see numerous opportunities in AI overall, split between GPUs, high bandwidth memory, and advanced packaging. And so when -- in the totality, we've kind of sized that all that business at about 10% of Veeco's revenue this year. And I think, obviously as we bring on a second HBM memory provider, I would think that we would -- that would probably drive incremental. I don't have the number right at the tip of my thumb here, but I would say probably $30 million, $50 million over a year, two-year period for that customer. I would say, Dave, at this point, we are in the demo phase and not yet to the point of an evaluation agreement. And so from the time we place an eval, that would probably be a year of evaluation plus integration. So we -- I don't believe we would expect any revenue in 2024, and maybe this would probably be out more in mid 2025 timeframe.

And then could you just help us understand what -- how big you think -- I understand there's several opportunities here, but I think the biggest driver of your revenue now is in the memory area. Could you help us understand how big the high bandwidth memory opportunity is, either in 2023 or 2024, or whenever you'd like to -- how much revenue Veeco should get from that market?

Yeah. It's hard to say, David, here's why. Last quarter, we became qualified with our first customer in HBM. We've now learned that we're qualified in their more -- most advanced generic memory. And so for us, we can't now know before I could say these shipments were going to high bandwidth memory, but now we don't really know what's the mix between high bandwidth and standard memory. So it gets very hard for us to look at it in totality. But if I step back and look at it at a higher level in laser annealing, we see ultimately the opportunity in aggregate for laser annealing to be a $900 million market in 2027. And about half of that in memory. The mix between …

I was going to…

Go ahead Dave.

Just to clarify. So you basically said your first high bandwidth memory customer has now taken your LSA product not just into high bandwidth memory, but into standard DRR5 and other products.

Yes.

Okay. Then just to switch gears and -- or did you have something to add on to what you were saying, because I interrupted you.

No, I'm fine. Thanks Dave.

Okay. And then, this nano LSA, TAM information, thank you very much. That was awesome. Do you think the applications in the founding logic business are going to be tied to backside power and gate all around? Or is that the way we should be thinking about it and that's when we would expect the ramp of that type of revenue? Or maybe just elaborate a little bit more for us. Thanks.

Yeah. I would say, yes, there are opportunities in backside power distribution that customers are very interested in evaluating our nanosecond annealing tool for, but there are also other applications that they're just starting to explore things like void reduction, recrystallization, and really we haven't sized those markets, but when we talk to customers, they're very interested in trying those type applications out with this new product.

Okay. Final question from me just has to do with the epi tool for silicon carbide. Could you just give us a little bit more elaborate update on when you expect demos and evaluations and whatnot? And then just -- you mentioned that you have a single wafer approach. I think the other guys in the market are a batch approach. Why are you pursuing this particular approach and what do you think the advantages are? Thanks. That's it for me.

I would say, Dave, that we are on track with our plan post our silicon carbide epi equipment company acquisition in January of this year. We have a tool operating in Somerset, New Jersey. We are running films. We've demonstrated high growth rate, we've demonstrated good film quality, good uniformity, morphology, et cetera, and we're building out our demo bingo sheet, if you will, and making progress there. Our plan is to be demo ready by year-end, and so we're feverishly working toward that with the goal of putting a few silicon carbide evaluation systems out in the field next year. Because I feel we're on track with the original plan we laid out. Regarding your question on single wafer versus batch, we've spoken to a lot of Tier 1 customers in the industry and we feel very comfortable with our single wafer approach in that. There's really no solution on the market today that meets all of our customers' needs. And they really from -- introducing the tool to customers and having some customers crawl over the tool, they really like the simplicity of the machine. They like the opportunity that the design has to be green to green from going into a maintenance cycle and then coming out of a maintenance cycle. And these tools require today a fair amount of maintenance, which is a real detractor to the cost of ownership, and also the fact they're putting so many machines in these fabs, they really need to be -- they can't all be run by a PhD. And this I think is an area where Veeco has excelled in the past in putting large fleets of equipment in place. And so we feel pretty, pretty comfortable where we stand today in silicon carbide.

Thank you.

Thanks Dave.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Mark Miller with Benchmark. Please proceed with your question.

Thank you for the question. Congratulations. Another good quarter. Just was wondering, in terms of your data storage business, are there opportunities as we transition into Hammer type technology for upgrades that you would expect next year or this year also?

There might be some, but I would say it is probably not a major driver of our business. What would be probably more interesting is, as Hammer becomes more broadly adopted, the view is -- the complexity of the head increases, and therefore the number of deposition and X steps increases as well, which hopefully should be a tailwind for equipment demand as Hammer becomes more broadly adopted.

Okay. Your guidance for this quarter and also last quarter, margins have come up. I'm just wondering about your current backlog. What does the margin profile look like similar to what you've been seeing in the last two quarters?

Yeah. I think, Mark, we've been working quite hard on improving our gross margins. That's been a real focus for the company. And you're right, we've increased our gross margin as the year progressed. We did see some favorable areas in terms of providing that gross margin improvement, and things like, getting better efficiencies, better utilizations, as we think about our manufacturing, our servicing of customers, and we've spent quite a bit of effort on that. I'm not going to specifically give a guide going into next year for gross margin. But I would say that, we continue to make progress against our target margins. And we'll give as much effort next year as we gave this year to improve gross margins going forward.

Thank you.

Thanks Mark.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the floor back over to CEO, Bill Miller, for closing comments. End of Q&A:

Thank you, operator. I do want to thank our customers and shareholders along with the Veeco United team for their continued support as we execute our growth strategy. Goodnight and have a great evening.

This concludes today's teleconference. You may now disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.