Good day, ladies and gentlemen. And welcome to the Vulcan Materials' Fourth Quarter 2007 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Frances, and I will be your coordinator for today. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. We will conduct a question-and-answer session towards the end of this conference. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to turn the presentation over to your host for today's call, Mr. Don James, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Please proceed.

Good morning. Thank you for joining this conference call to discuss our 2007 results and our outlook for 2008. I'm Don James, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Vulcan Materials Company. We appreciate your interest in Vulcan. We hope our remarks and dialogue will be helpful to you. A replay of this conference call will be available later today at our website. Joining me today is Dan Sansone, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Before I begin, let me remind you that certain matters discussed in this conference call contain forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Description to these risks and uncertainties are detailed in the company's SEC reports, including our most recent report on Form 10K. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date here of and the company assume no obligation to update such statements. Vulcan achieved record results in a challenging economic environment. These record results included net sales of more than $3 billion, operating cash flows of approximately $700 million, operating earnings of $714 million and EBITDA of $982 million. Despite weaker demand for our products, principally from residential construction, these results underscore the fundamental strength and resiliency of our businesses. To put this in perspective, a historic look back five years ago might be informative. The comparison to 2002 results is worth noting for two reasons. First, higher earnings on similar levels of aggregate shipments and more importantly what our current profitability could mean to margin improvement when volumes began to recover. In 2007, the absolute level of aggregate shipments were similar to 2002's level. Construction activity in 2002 is hampered by an economic slowdown calls by the tech bubble in the 2001, 2002 timeframe. And as a result…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. Your first question comes from the line of Ajay Kejriwal with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed.

Good morning, gentleman.

Good morning.

On your pricing guidance of 8% to 10%, I guess that includes Florida Rock, but --

Yes, it does.

Okay. So, wondering if you could help us with what you expect for Florida Rock versus legacy Vulcan, just so if we can make apples-to-apples comparison?

Well, the rate of increase in aggregates prices will be higher in Florida than in other markets in 2008. That's already in place, as you know. I don't have a breakdown between, as you know, Florida was also a part of the legacy Vulcan business. And so, it's depending upon where we source the material that goes to Florida, it could be counted as part of the Florida Rock or Florida legacy Vulcan. So, that's one of those distinctions that get increasingly difficult to make. But, our 8% to 10% does include additional volumes in Florida whether sourced from Florida Rock, legacy quarries or Vulcan legacy quarries.

Okay. So, I guess, if you could help us understand what you're looking for in Florida? So, legacy Vulcan plus Florida Rock volumes, if you combined that together, what would be pricing just in Florida?

Well, it's substantially above the 8% to 10%. But, as you know I guess last year, SYMEX announced a $5 per ton price increase for aggregates in their facilities in Florida. I believe that increase has taken affect and certainly that's depending upon which market you are in Florida and because of the difference between the pricing of imported aggregates and domestically produced aggregates, that rate of increase is different from market-to-market. But, overall it is substantially above 8% to 10% overall price increase. I can't give you a breakdown of exactly how much that is.

I mean the SYMEX number we all heard was about $5 last year, so is $2 to $3 a fair number to use for all of your operations because the $5 apparently was just in the Miami portion?

I don't think that's correct I think that would apply to Tampa and Jacksonville and Orlando as well. Again we are trying to draw distinctions between whether the price increase is coming from a Florida Rock legacy quarry our Vulcan legacy quarry is just not something, I mean we can guess but as the year progresses those things are going to move around a great deal. Suffice it to say that Florida will have a significantly higher rate of price increase than other markets in the U.S. largely based on the shrinking reserve base there.

I got it. Moving to volume, residential '07 volume of 43 million could you provide us similar numbers for non-res and the infrastructure pieces please?

Well, we published the percentage that or we will publish it as soon as we put out our 10-K but I'll give you those numbers. In '07 we estimate and I emphasize we estimate because when a truck load of rock leaves our gate we cannot be certain where it ends up but we estimate that 47% of our shipments went to public, publicly funded infrastructure projects of about 19% in the residential both single family, multifamily, 31% in the private non-res, then about 3% in the other which would include railroad ballast and agricultural and chemical uses.

Okay. So it sounds like you are assuming 15% decline in residential and low single-digit increases in non-res and infrastructure buckets?

Correct.

Okay. Great. Lastly on your guidance which includes $0.47 to $0.50 from the divestiture of those nine assets --

It includes more than that, it includes earnings from sites to be divested until they are in fact divested. It includes the earnings from properties we will get into swaps, it includes interest savings that we project from being able to pay down debt with cash proceeds and it includes gain on the two properties that are legacy Vulcan, as you know, we will not record a gain on the Florida Rock legacy assets to be sold because we will first write them up to fair market value which by definition will be the amount we them selling for. So the… how well that breaks out is still uncertain we are moving along with the buyers and people who will be swapping for those properties but we do not have firm contracts yet and so that's just an estimate and I don't think we are prepared to try to be any more precise about how much of that is coming from earnings and how much is coming from interest savings and how much is coming from gain. We will give you that information once these transactions are firm and final but at this point, there is a lot of moving parts in that number.

Great. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Garik Shmois with Longbow Research. Please proceed.

Hi, good morning.

Good morning.

Just wondering if you could talk a little bit more about infrastructure volumes for '08. And just maybe break it out between some of the states that you are more confident and some of the states that you are seeing a little bit more weakness? And also, if you could discuss just some of the concerns out there with respect to states discussing budgeting problems and if you think that that could be a risk to your infrastructure outlook?

By far, the most significant state for public infrastructure as we look at '08 is California. You, I'm sure are aware of the bond funding for infrastructure that's been approved. You are aware of the program there that I referenced in my remarks. One of the bright spots of state infrastructure funding is that as we understand it at this point, even though California is projecting a significant budget deficit overall, it will have very little if any impact on this infrastructure program. We expect to see some benefit in shipments resulting from that program, certainly by the second half of '08, but that program has got a lot of momentum, it will have a very significant impact on shipments of construction materials in California for years and years and to the future. And as I've said, it appears at this point that it is not tied to the overall 10% reduction that Governor Schwarzenegger has asked for from the various departments in California State government. Virginia as you probably know has substantially increased its commitment to public highway funding. There is some more sensitivity in Virginia, I think to the state budget than in California, but that program is still going forward with substantially increased commitment to public infrastructure spending. On the flip side, the State of Tennessee remains weak and its commitment to highways, most states if you look at the combination of highways and public infrastructure are in the sort of low-single digit increase in demand over '07.

Okay. Thank you for that. And can you talk about your aggregates pricing expectations in California. I know you have been able to achieve some very significant increases there over the years with volumes off. In residential business, there can be infrastructures still holding in there, are you expecting another significant perhaps double-digit price increase in some of your larger California markets?

That is, the rate of increase in California is probably going to be less than it has been historically until the public infrastructure projects pickup, as you know southern California has been one of the markets that has been affected most by the decline in residential construction. We have added new production capacity at Corona, California, which can serve both the L.A Basin and San Diego. That plant is now fully on stream and we have additional capacity to serve the market. Once the infrastructure program start consuming construction materials in California, we expect the price momentum to resume, but at this point with the slowdown in housing it is less than it has been historically.

Okay. And just lastly if you can discuss this expectations for synergies from Florida Rock a year ago when you announced the acquisition for 2008 you were looking at a figure above [ph] $43 million, would you be able to guide us in some direction of what you're expecting for '08?

Sure. I think at this point we are right on the projections we gave earlier. We think by the end of '08, we will have in place all of the synergies that would yield annual savings of about $50 million a year. We have achieved or by the end of this month, we will achieve the full $80 million of one-time cash synergies that we projected that has come along very nicely. I think there we're working very hard to identify and achieve additional synergies. They will come largely through operating improvements in both concrete and aggregates as we collect the best scale of knowledge in both companies and put our heads together on ways to work together. There are some additional opportunities that a combined company can pursue in '08 that neither company alone could effectively pursue and we are working hard to get to those. We will give you additional guidance as we can identify and quantify additional synergies, but at this point we are right on track for the $50 million we initially projected.

Great thank you very much.

Your next question comes form the line of Dan Oppenheim with Banc of America Securities. Please proceed.

Hi this is Mike Woods. Can you talk about the price increase that you have got towards '08, whether or not that includes any additional increases beyond what you've already announced, the clients generally out there.

I am not sure I follow your question.

I understood, within that expectation there is additional price increases that you are planning to put through mid-year or the shift what you've already announced in January that you expect to take effect over the next few months.

There will be contributions from both as we I think have tried to explain before, we don't have a company wide pricing strategy. We do have a company-wide pricing strategy. We do not have a company-wide price increases that go into affect at certain times of year. This is a market-by-market, product-by-product, customer-by-customer pricing strategy. And we will have price increases in various markets for various products throughout the year. But, in answer I think, if I understand your question, the 8% to 10% in price improvement we expect in '08, some of that is already in place through announced price increases and some of it will be the result of price increases that occur at different times of the year in different market.

Okay. And can you just provide more color on what your thoughts are with converting some of the short terms debt that you took on as a result of Florida Rock. And what we should think about modeling in for interest cost associated with that debt in '08?

Let me; let Dan Sansone respond to that.

I can answer that question a couple of ways. At this point in time, you probably are aware that we issued about $1.2 billion of debt in December of 2007. That still leaves us today with a considerable amount of short-term debt. Our current plan is that we will term out somewhere in the neighborhood of $600 million to $700 million of additional long-term debt. During the course of 2008, the exact timing of that is going to be really driven more by market conditions than it is anything else. We... in terms of guidance, what I would offer is that, we're looking at... and what's embedded in the earnings guidance we just provided is about $178 million of net interest expense for 2008. And the key assumption there is that we term out the $600 million of additional long-term debt in the middle of the second quarter. To the extent that we deviate from that timing, there will be a modest affect on the interest cost. But, that’s our current modeling assumption in planning, if you... if we do term out $600 million in the middle of the second quarter, and if rates stay where they are today, we would then be looking at a kind of an all in run rate of about 5.6% for all of our incremental financing referable to the Florida Rock transaction. That would be the combination of the long-term debt and the portion that would stay short and is based on current rates.

Okay. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Tim Martinez [ph] with UBS. Please proceed?

Yes. Hi, thanks for the detail Don and Dan. Wanted to ask on the volume side for a little better color. I'm just trying to understand the macro assumptions that you might be making to get to a 0% to 2% decline. Given that some of the highway budgets, you appointed to the public spending tend to be fairly fixed in nature in terms of the budgets, and given that and assume the 8% to 10% increase, how is it possible that there could be enough, I guess, availability to spend another 10% increase given the rest of the cost that are rising? So, are you assuming a pickup in demand at the second half of the year like Martin planned out?

Yes. In public infrastructure, overall I am not.

Yes, I mean I was pointing out public infrastructure where I think budgets can be tighter but if you could comment on the different segments, particularly non-res and public infrastructure?

Well if you break out public infrastructure into highways and other, we think the other is probably going to be stronger than highways. We think buildings whether they are public or private will increase slightly in '08 over in '07 and I'm talking about a tonnage… tons, more so in dollars than in tons because as you point out, the cost of all building materials including steel and liquid asphalt and other things are moving up. Residential, we think will be down probably another 15%. One of the things that you should factor in of courses is that we have added 3 million tons of production and shipping capacity at our CALICA quarry and that whole thing is basically sold out for 2008. So we will pick up some volume from that, our Corona quarry in Los Angeles now has… it will give us additional capacity and we’ll pick up some volume from that. I think if you look at as we try to point out the Vulcan served states on both public infrastructure and private non-res, based on contract awards in '06 and ‘07 are stronger than the rest of the country. So when we say flat to down 2%, we take into account the relatively stronger contract awards in our markets, we take into account the additional capacity we now have and we factor in highways being flat to down 1% other public infrastructure being up 3%, public and private buildings being up 1% and residential being down about 15%. That's the basis of our volume outlook.

Great that's helpful, and then can you remind us of your exposure to Lake Belt and give us any update on the discussions are going there?

Our exposure to the Lake Belt is a single quarry in Miami that has about 4 million to 5 million tons of production capacity. I think it has never shipped more than about four, it is now continuing to ship from either material that was mined prior to the last court ruling or from material that's mined in a portions of a quarry that are still available for mining. We do not have any update. The case was argued in the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in Atlanta back in November and there will be some ruling at some point. Then after the court ruling, presumably the core of engineers will then have… will exercise its jurisdictions over the permitting and issue whatever permits it deems appropriate. But at this point we don't have any prediction for that outcome.

Okay Great thanks for the color.

Your next question comes from the line of Jack Kasprzak with BB&T Capital Markets. Please proceed. Jack Kasprzak - BB&T Capital Markets: Thanks. Good morning, Don.

Good morning, Jack. Jack Kasprzak - BB&T Capital Markets: On the question of synergies that you addressed a little earlier, I just wanted to ask is that contribution assumed in the '08 guidance?

Some portion of it. Jack Kasprzak - BB&T Capital Markets: Okay.

I want to be clear, we are saying by the end of '08, we will have the entire 50 million run rate in place. I think the impact on '08 is less than that, because all of that is not in place on January 1. Jack Kasprzak - BB&T Capital Markets: Right.

But substantial portion of it is, but not all of it. Jack Kasprzak - BB&T Capital Markets: Okay. And then with regard to the $0.47 to $0.50 a share, that's included in '08 guidance referable to the various transactions you mentioned, is it the case that there will be some portion of that although we don't know how much that will go away as part of the ongoing Vulcan operations due to the divestiture process unless you could swap a 100% [inaudible] earnings?

Let me… there is… assume for a moment a closing at the end of the first quarter. There will be some earnings contribution from the divested assets during the first quarter, that's included. That will not continue for the rest of the year because those assets will be divested. And we will get some assets in exchange, so we will have nine months of earnings from those assets, then there will be some cash, which we would use at debt reduction, so our interest charges will be reduced for the last nine months of the year, and there will likely be some accounting gain on the legacy Vulcan assets that will be sold even though, as you know, in the miracles of purchase accounting you can sell one quarry and have no gain if it was legacy Florida Rock and you can sell another quarry that’s just like it, that was legacy Vulcan and you will have a gain. So, there will likely be a significant gain from the Vulcan assets that are in the exchange and no gain from the Florida Rock assets that are in the transaction. So, I wouldn't… you shouldn't… we are saying that's the full-year impact of all of this stuff working together. So, we believe the $0.47 to $0.50 per share is part of our full-year '08 earnings, some portion of that will be continuing and some portion won't. And at this point, we've got to get deals closed before we can do those calculations, but we will give you some additional guidance on that. But, I wouldn't… I don't think it's correct to say some portion of that goes away after the transaction, that's the full-year impact to us from all of these… from the impact of all of these transactions plus the purchase accounting. Jack Kasprzak - BB&T Capital Markets: Okay. That's very helpful. Thank you. And with regard to concrete in Florida, how are prices of ready-mix concrete in Florida, I think the last public release by Florida Rock before you closed the deal, it seems to be holding up fairly well in the face of a severe residential decline? Can you characterize it for us now?

Well, I think pricing for concrete (52:04) is going to be a challenge. We certainly don't… our philosophy is there will not be a single additional house built in Florida if concrete prices are $20 per yard lower than they are today, that's not going to move demand, there are so many other much more significant factors in the determination of whether to build a house than what the concrete prices are. But, we have to be competitive. But, at this point, as I have said in my remarks, we are pleased with the resiliency of concrete prices in the face of substantially lower demand. I think we realize that demand won’t be created by lower prices. Jack Kasprzak - BB&T Capital Markets: Okay, great. Thanks very much.

Your next question comes from the line of Trey Grooms with Stephens Inc. Please proceed.

Good morning. You touched on, after Jack's question, the pricing environment kind of in Florida and then you've also talked about pricing with aggregates. Could you talk a little bit about the demand environment in Florida for aggregates, concrete, and then also cement which in the quarter… also if you could touch on the… a little bit of detail on what was going on there, it seems like it came in a little bit weaker than kind of what we would have expected it to come in?

With respect to aggregate demand in Florida, obviously, aggregate demand in Florida is off significantly from the past few years. But, what is also off significantly is the supply of aggregates in Florida, which is the reason that you're seeing above average price improvement for aggregates in Florida. Housing is obviously very weak, public infrastructure is pretty good in Florida. It's very difficult for us at this point to have any visibility into when the housing market stabilizes and begin to recover. Different economists have different views on that and in our view it would not be any better than the views of others in that regard. With respect to overall demand for aggregates, the fourth quarter is a… as you know… the first quarter has so many factors that affect aggregate demand, principally weather and the impact of people either deciding to try to get projects finished or to carry them over. Our fourth quarter shipments were lower than we thought they would be, that is overall, but not of any great concern to us at this point because of the seasonality of our business.

And you're talking about aggregates there?

Yes.

Okay. Could you touch more specifically on maybe the non-res, what's going on in Florida there with non-res? I know you touched on housing and then infrastructure a bit.

I don't have any specific... well... let's see I have got my little sheet here, let me take a look at that. Non-res and that's… our view is that in North Florida buildings will be up about 2% and in South Florida they will be flat. Infrastructure, which includes both public and private, in North Florida we believe it will be up about 4% and in South Florida up about 1%. These are aggregate tons not dollars of spending. Of course the dollar of spending would have to be higher on a percentage basis because price of aggregates has moved up in those markets. These are our internal demand projections or aggregates by region. As I've said, these are our best estimates, but you know we could... they could vary obviously from these views.

Okay. Thanks Don, it's very helpful. And then just one the cement in the quarter, I know it was a stub period, and you had holidays and so forth going on, but still the revenue seems I guess fairly low coming out of the cement operations and volumes seem lower. Is there something particular going on there, but that's just weak demand or is there something else that happened in the quarter?

Yes. We had our cement plant outage that was scheduled in the fourth quarter and we went ahead and took it.

That was after closing.

That was in the stub period and that's… you didn't follow us back when we were in the chemicals business, but once or twice a year when we took our chemical plants down for annual maintenance outages you saw a significant impact on earnings in whatever quarter that occurred and you will continue to see that with the cement plant. But, the stub period in the fourth quarter was significantly impacted by the annual maintenance outage, which occurred in the last six weeks of the year in cement. So, that accounts for what you see at revenues.

Okay. Is there any way you could maybe quantify that a little bit?

I don't have the data in front of me to do that, but...

Okay. Fair enough. And then the other question is you kind of touched on your thoughts that energy would be… and asphalt cost would be trimming. Could you give us any more color on kind of your expectations and kind of what is baked into guidance as far as your outlook for energy and liquid asphalt for the year?

Yes, just a second. I think… as we said, the fourth quarter cost of diesel fuel was up about 41% from the fourth quarter of '06. We expect that level to continue, at least that's what we’ve built into our '08 projection that the fourth quarter diesel... fourth quarter '07 diesel fuel pricing will continue throughout '08 to the extent we get some price relief that will improve our earnings. To the extent diesel fuel gets higher than it was in the fourth quarter, it will have some negative earnings impact and predicting diesel fuel pricing with this market is... has a lot of payroll, but that’s what’s build into our projection is, diesel fuel pricing in '08 equal to the fourth quarter '07 level.

Okay. Great. Thanks, Don.

Your next question comes from the line of Chris Manuel with Keybanc Capital Markets. Please proceed.

Good morning, gentlemen. A couple of questions for you. First, Dan, just a couple of housekeeping items. Can you tell us what the CapEx and the DD&A and interest rate assumptions are for '08?

Yes. For CapEx, I would use $485 million.

Okay.

For DD&A, we see that settling in at right about $400 million for the combined company and that includes our best estimates as of today any way with respect to the purchase accounting step up in the Florida Rock assets. What was the third variable? Interest rate, yes.

Tax rate.

Pardon me.

Tax rate.

Tax rate, I'm sorry. What I would use for 2008 is 32%. We will be in that neighborhood plus or minus rounding.

Okay. Thank you. And Don, one of the pieces that… you've given us the synergy and you've given us an update on the synergy target, that appears reasonable. Another piece of guidance at the time of transaction that you gave us was to anticipate, I believe, it was over the '08 to 2010 timeframe of average EBITDA in the $2 billion range per year over that timeframe. Clearly the markets have turned a bit worse with respect to Florida and housing. At this point, it maybe appears, at least by my math, that maybe you can get two or two-ish billion range by the end of 2010. Can you give us a comment or thought as to how you think about the combined entity over the long period at this point?

We don't have a projection of the combined company, at this point, for the period beyond '08. I think it's a fair statement that our EBITDA projection for '08 today is lower than it was a year ago. That's the result of not only the Florida Rock business, but the bulk and legacy business. We believe the combined company will be a strong cash generating organization, but we certainly can't affirm the three years of average $2 billion EBITDA because our '08 number is lower than what we had in that roll up as we indicated at the time that was an average over three years and it was projected to increase. Certainly, we think there is a lot of upside both the legacy Vulcan business and the legacy Florida Rock business, but more importantly, there is even more upside to the synergies in the combination. But that's… when we get to that number, it’s going to be largely dependent upon what the markets do and the wild card there is when residential markets began to stabilize and recover. We will have a new President within the year. There is a great deal of discussion already about the under funding of public infrastructure in the US. I think that will... we will see that increasingly as a subject of discussion. There is a lot of stuff going on in Washington about public infrastructure. You are aware of the Commission report, the Commission that was established as a result of the last highway build to talk about funding. We are not sure what the outcome is going to be, but we expect there'll be a great deal of dialog and possibly a very significant change in the way public infrastructure is funded and the levels at which it is funded and that will have a very significant impact on us going forward. We don’t know what the outcome is going to be, but we are certainly going to be engaged in a dialog.

Okay, that is fair. And with respect to... I'd like to follow-up on Jack's question earlier from the $0.47 to $0.50, I appreciate that you are... it's difficult to fare it out, each of the individual pieces, but is it safe to assume that a sizable portion of that or was it ... would it be a sizeable portion or a smaller portion that would be represented from the gain on the sale of assets?

You will be...

Effectively, what we are trying to get at is, what would be a recurring piece?

I think there will be a significant gain, at least, if we close the transactions that we are contemplating at this point, there will be a significant accounting gain on the portion of the divested assets [inaudible] from legacy Vulcan. But that's not all of it, there is continuing earnings from the swap properties, there's reduced interest cost from utilization of cash. But, as I have said earlier, there are a lot of moving pieces in there and until we get these deals closed, we can't tell you...

I understand and realize there are a lot of moving parts, but directionally would you characterize the gain as greater or less than say half of that amount?

I think it's... it would be more than half.

That’s very helpful. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Mike Betts with J.P. Morgan. Please proceed.

Yes, hi.

Hi, Mike.

Hi, Don. I have two or three questions I guess all related to Florida Rock. First one is just to clarify because $0.32 that you indicated hit the fourth quarter earnings or for the year rather, they were all kind of financial items or stuff like that. Was there no operating contribution in the six weeks?

Yes, there was. It was not huge but it was... there was an operating contribution, there was also an offsetting purchase accounting... additional depreciation on all of the Florida Rock assets over and above what would have been had they remained within Florida Rock. As I mentioned, we had our annual cement plant outage that we took in that stub period. Yes, there were some contributions, earnings from the operations in that period, but they were not significant in light of the whole $0.32.

Okay. And my second question relating to Florida Rock was, you talked about the synergies, but... and this may be just my view, the managements have been somewhat slow last year to just cut cost to the reflect decline in volumes because you know they were seeing 30% to 50% volume declines. So, even if they hadn't done a transaction with you, you would have expected fairly significant cut-backs. I guess you've been implementing that cost cutting in the last six weeks and you got more to go. Are you able to sort of indicate over and above synergies? What sort of cost cutting you've done within that business to reflect the deteriorate… the worsening outlook there?

Certainly, there have been cost reductions. I do not have a quantification of that that I can give you my colleagues. The one metric… and I can't break it down between synergies and cost reduction, but both legacy Vulcan and legacy Florida Rock headcounts are down. Florida Rock, I think, there are about 350 people both hourly and salary that are no longer in the combined organization. Some of that is included in the synergy and some is operating businesses as a result of the issues with demand.

To what percentage that was of the workforce?

About

11% or 12%.

11% OR 12%:

Okay and final question. Because we talked a bit… we mentioned earlier the ready-mix concrete price issue. Have you announced price increases… or what's happening I guess is my question is, in Q1 in Florida? I mean, we would begin to see some pressure on ready-mix concrete prices there and I guess more generally in the US. Have you seen any change in trend in that in the first quarter or is there still some downward pressure on ready-mix prices?

I don't think there is a lot of downward pressure that we've been able to see. I think it is likely that by the end of the year '08 compared to '07, because of the contracts with pricing rolling of and new contracts going out that there may be some discernible change there, but I can't tell you at this point what those likely to be.

Okay, that's great. Thank you very much.

Your next question comes from the line of with John Fox with Fenimore Asset. Please proceed.

Hi. Good morning everyone.

Hi John.

Believe it or not I have a few questions left. First, I just want to confirm on all the discussions about tons in terms of guidance of legacy and the percentage of shipments, that's total tons both internal and external?

Yes

Okay great. And then maybe if you could tell us a little bit more about the cement business, you gave some guidance on a concrete shipments combined for '08. Do you have any thoughts on cement shipments, number one? And number two, can you tell us what the CapEx is this year for Newberry?

Cement shipments… from legacy Florida Rock there are two sources of cement shipments, one is the Newberry plant, the other are imports.

Right.

I think the tonnage from imports will be significantly reduced. The tonnage from the Newberry plant will be largely the same. The second line of the Newberry plant will come on stream probably by the end of the year. So, I don't think we’ve built in any incremental volume from that second line in our '08 outlook, but it will be available in '09. Certainly, the volume reduction is in imports. And I think that's been the view all along that the domestic cement capacity in Florida would displace imports because it is lower cost than imports. On CapEx in '08, we're projecting plus or minus $50 million at the Newberry cement plant to get that second line up and running and then the regular CapEx that would be necessary. As you know, it’s a brand new plant, so there is not a lot of other CapEx that would have to spent there.

So, presumably that go away in '09?

[inaudible].

Okay. And then for Dan, you said 178 of net interest expense, is that net of interest income?

Yes.

Okay. And you've mentioned $80 million in one-time cash synergies, I think occurred in January?

David, they've been occurring since closing. We think by the end of the first quarter virtually all of the items that we identified will have been put in place.

Okay. So, I can add $80 million to the year-end cash balance that's been coming in both last year and this year.

That's correct. We have not received all of the... for example, there is one item, $33 million that we'll receive at the end of February, just as a point of illustration.

John, that’s a net number.

Yes.

There is cash out and there is cash in. That's a net number.

Right. I'm just trying to get a cash collections and ability to deliver and that type of thing.

Right.

So, some of that can come in in '08?

Yes.

John, we're reasonably comfortable that we are going to be able to take debt down probably $300 million in '08.

By the end of '08?

Yes.

Yes.

And that includes the effects of divestitures etcetera?

Yes.

Yes. That's everything all worked in together, operating cash flow, net cash, synergies we just discussed [inaudible].

Those cash synergies for the rest of '08. Is there any GAAP accounting gain or is that included in EBITDA or is that a forecast?

Any impact of that is included in our guidance. But, most of it is not going to have a big GAAP accounting impact.

So, there would not be a significant earnings impact from those cash synergies, is that fair?

That's correct.

That's correct. There would not be.

Okay.

John, I don’t remember whether you were with us in the years following the CalMat acquisition, but we had the same thing. We were generating a lot of cash that was not showing up as accounting earnings and then at some point it started becoming accounting earnings, as well as cash as the fair market values of the properties started exceeding the purchase accounting write-off. So, we will see that here as well, but for initial year or two you'll see cash but not much GAAP accounting earnings.

Okay. Thank you.

There are no other questions in queue at this time. I like to turn the call back over to Mr. Don James for closing remarks.

Thank you very much for your interest in Vulcan today. We've got a lot of work to do in 2008, but we're excited about the prospects of the continued opportunities of bringing these two businesses together. We look forward to talking with you again at the end of the first quarter. Thank you very much and have a good day.

Thank you all for your participation in today's conference. This concludes the presentation. You may now disconnect and have a great day.