Welcome to the Vornado Realty Trust Earnings and Webcast for First Quarter of 2022. My name is Vanessa, and I will be your operator for today’s call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I will now turn the call over to Mr. Steven Borenstein, Senior Vice President and Corporation Counsel. Steven, you may begin.

Welcome to Vornado Realty Trust first quarter earnings call. Yesterday afternoon, we issued our first quarter earnings release and filed our quarterly report on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These documents, as well as our supplemental financial information package are available on our website, www.vno.com under the Investor Relations section. In these documents and during today’s call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are included in our earnings release, Form 10-Q and financial supplements. Please be aware that statements made during this call may be deemed forward-looking statements and actual results may differ materially from these statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors. Please refer to our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, for more information regarding these risks and uncertainties. The call may include time-sensitive information that may be accurate only as of today’s date. The company does not undertake a duty to update any forward-looking statements. On the call today from management for our opening comments are Steven Roth, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Michael Franco, President and Chief Financial Officer. Our senior team is also present and available for questions. I will now turn the call over to Steven Roth.

Thank you, Steve, and good morning, everyone. Let me begin by saying I thought we had a very good quarter with FFO up 22% from last year, reflecting the continued recovery in our business, and we continue to see many positive trends across the business. To my eye, the streets of New York are back to pre-COVID in terms of pedestrian count and our beloved traffic congestion. Borders are full and by full, I mean, literally full with long waiting lists, restaurants are booming and office utilization is climbing. We are now over 46% utilization as we speak. There are a couple of things I’d like to highlight. First, we have more floating rate debt than most, and that strategy is correct nine out of every 10 years, but this is the 10th year. The economy is now in the hands of the Federal Reserve in their role as inflation fighter and appropriately so. If past is prologue, we expect rates to climb quickly up a mountain, slow the economy and inflation, and then quickly fall down the other side. Second, for the first time this quarter, our GAAP financial statements reflect the balance sheet and income statement effect of the pending June 2023 PENN 1 ground lease renewal. We have estimated $26 million as the new ground rent pending the actual arbitration proceeded. While these two numbers are substantial and will slow our growth short-term, we believe that as Farley, PENN 1, and PENN 2 come online growth will be very, very substantial. Now, over to Michael.

Thank you, Steve, and good morning, everyone. As Steve mentioned, we had another strong quarter. First quarter comparable FFO as adjusted was $0.79 per share, compared to $0.65 for last year’s first quarter, an increase of $0.14 or 22%. This increase was primarily from rent commencement on new office and retail leases and the continued recovery of our variable businesses. We have provided a quarter-over-quarter bridge in our earnings release on Page 2 in our financial supplement on Page 5. As Steve mentioned, this quarter for the first time, we are recognizing in our financials the impact in the pending PENN 1 ground lease renewal. Under GAAP, we are required to record the present value of the estimated additional lease liability on our balance sheet and start recognizing the straight-line impact in our earnings. This reduced our earnings this quarter by approximately $4 million and we’ll reduce it by $21 million overall in 2022 and $23 million on a full-year basis. The reduction in earnings will not impact cash FFO, however, until we actually start paying and increase rent in June of 2023. Looking ahead, we had initially expected to deliver double-digit percentage FFO per share growth in 2022, driven primarily by previously signed leases in both office and retail, particularly metal platforms at Farley, and the continued recovery of our variable businesses. We now expect the impact of projected interest rate hikes by the Fed and our variable rate debt to be a greater headwind to this year’s growth than we originally anticipated. We had assumed the LIBOR would move up this year when we gave a preview of 2022 last quarter, but it now looks like it will move up more than we expected this year. Keep in mind, we’re also earning more on our cash balances as…

Thank you. We will now begin our question-and-answer session. [Operator instructions] We have our first question from Manny Korchman with Citigroup.

Hey. It’s Michael Bilerman speaking. Michael, leasing has definitely kept pace start the year. You talked a little bit about pipeline. I was wondering if you can sort of unpack some of those numbers in terms of where you’re seeing the activity? How much of it’s on vacant space versus existing stuff that’s going to roll just to give a little bit more detail about the momentum in leasing that you’re seeing?

Yes. Why don’t you take that one?

Hi, Michael. It’s Glen. How are you?

Good.

So the 1.2 million feet Michael mentioned in his remarks, I mean, it’s a very healthy mix, I would call it, 50-50 of new expansion versus renewals. A lot of the activity is in PENN and a lot more of the activities in the financial service building. So in terms of looking forward, as we said, we expect occupancy to continue to improve throughout the year, continue to fill spaces, but we’re seeing a real good mix across all types of PENN types in the portfolio as we sit here.

Great. And then maybe just on PENN 1, Michael, you talked a little bit about the ground lease in terms of recognizing the value that you’ve put in, which is obviously now it sounds like subject to arbitration. Can you just sort of walk through sort of the math a little bit? It would seem as though that 12.2% targeted return would probably come down, call it, about 500 basis points for the extra ground lease. But maybe just help us understand what the process is, given the fact that you’ve gone through 330 million West 34th that’s in arbitration and just trying to understand the timing of how all this will work through and ultimately its impact on financials.

Look, we – as we stated in the opening remarks, right, we put it on the balance sheet, straight-line in earnings. I think in Steve’s comments, he stated that the number we put down is $26 million. There’s a lot of data out there in terms of what the FAR is, et cetera. I’m not going to get into that. The process is going to commence near-term and so we’re going to continue to not get into details here publicly. But it’s our best guess based on where the site on PENN 1 is probably one of the largest sites to be valued. It’s three times the size of 330. Larger sites tend to be valued at lower prices than smaller sites just given the nature of the size and what can be built and the risk and so forth, construction costs, et cetera. The process is different on PENN 1 versus 330. And it will start, as I said, later this year and be finalized by the middle of next year. And so the new rent will take effect in June of 2023. As you stated, we have from the outset on PENN 1 put the return gross of any renewal rent because we don’t know exactly what that will be yet, instead it could be material. We’ve now daylighted our best guess as to what that may be and it will be finalized over the course of the next year.

Is that the right math, though, Michael, just thinking about that?

Michael, I’ll hang on for that. We chose to disclose our returns on the investment we’re making in PENN 1 on an incremental basis. Why? Had we not done – if we – the program is going to yield, let’s say, it’s a 2.5 million square foot rent that we’re building and the rents are going to go up somewhere $35, $40 or something like that. So let’s say they go up $30 on 250,000 square feet as the leases roll out over the next four or five years. That’s $75 million that approximately drops down to the bottom line, okay? So the ground rent would be – we think it will be $25 million, $26 million. And so we could easily handle that and easily get a return on the $400 million-odd we’re investing. Furthermore, we – the building together with its partner in the campus two PENN creates the nexus of what we’re doing in the PENN District. So it’s very important. We have a totally unique largest in-town amenity package, which is now complete and open to rave reviews from our tenants and the brokerage community and prospects. So we think it was absolutely the right thing to do. Now the arbitration that is going to see there are two different kinds of – 330 offices was a baseball arbitration. And what that is, is very simply, one side puts in a number, the other side puts in a number. And the arbitrator – and the neutral arbitrator decides, which number is more correct. In other words, the middle – if you’re $1 above the middle and the arbitrator is fine, then you win, et cetera. One PENN arbitration is different. It’s too arbitrated and a third is more of a negotiation and so it’s a totally different kind of business. We believe that the number that we have selected and chosen is correct for lots of different reasons, including comps in the marketplace, and that will all prove out over the next months and years. I expect the arbitration to start sometime before the – just before the end of the year. So that’s the way we look at it.

Michael, just to come back to your comments specifically on the math, right? If you take the 12.2 and you take the incremental rent that the $26 million implies we’re paying 2.5% today, so you’re 12.2 go down to 7%. Your math is correct.

Right. And then Steve’s point is that the reality is this is one massive complex where that ground lease supports a lot of other rent that’s being generated. And so it has to be looked at in totality rather on an individual basis.

Absolutely. And one other thing, okay? We’re in the process now of doing budgeting, which we do all the time. It’s my belief and Glen’s belief that if we – the building as offered in the marketplace now is worth in the 90s, I believe, $100 a foot. If you go out and look at what’s going on in the market to the west of us, at Manhattan West and Hudson Yards, rents are higher and substantially higher. And we believe our nexus with transportation creates a site, which is the best in the neighborhood. So we believe that we will start at in the 90s head of $100 a foot and three, four, five years from now, this asset will grow in value with rents that will go into the hundreds. So the 7.5% or 5% or 8%, whatever the return is at the opening is just the beginning of a more healthy investment period for this asset.

Okay. Thanks, Steve.

Thank you, Michael.

Our next question comes from Jamie Feldman with Bank of America.

Great. Thank you, and good morning. Steve, I want to go back to some of the comments you made in your Chairman’s letter. First, you said the last domino will be when employees and employers resolve hybrid work schedules and the office districts are teaming with activity, which will come sooner than you think. You also said tenants tell us they want less formal creative office west side model. Only half of New York’s 400 million square feet of office space fits that description. So as you sit back and think about these comments and think about the future of office in New York City, what else can you tell us about how Vornado plans to invest or maybe how your current portfolio does or doesn’t fit this description? And then also just what do you think office usage? It looks like a year from now in terms of days of the week and how people are going to use the space?

I’m going to shift back that off to Michael and Glen to start. It’s a very extensive question. I’m glad that you read my letter. Thank you.

Good morning, Jamie. So in terms of predictions of what utilization will be from now, it’s anybody’s guess, higher. We continue to see the trend higher, and there’s a fairly consistent pattern of Monday through Thursday higher; Tuesday through Thursday, the highest; and Friday, no one feels like commuting in the city. So absent their boss have come to get in the city, Friday will probably continue to be the low market. But that number continues to trend up, and I think it will continue to do so. I don’t – I’m not going to sort of make a prediction. I don’t know if Glen will in terms of what the number is. I think Steve’s comments on the type of space people want – the companies want, that trend started pre-pandemic, accelerated post-pandemic. I think what we’re doing in PENN is exactly what companies want. I think that’s why we’re seeing the reception we’re seeing with PENN 1 and now PENN 2 and even PENN 15 as they’ve seen the plans, although that’s still a bit off. So – but it doesn’t just go up the west side, right? We’re seeing demand at the 770s and the 85 10th the 350 Park and so on. So – but that being said, and we talked about, at least in my comments, selling assets, Long Island City, that was an asset that clearly doesn’t fall in that category. 40 Fulton, which we’re going to bring to market shortly. It’s a fine building, but that’s not an asset that we think is consistent where we want to own in 5, 10 years. So we’re going to prune the portfolio. We’re going to continue to upgrade, make sure we own assets that we do believe are going to reflect what tenants want or we can push rents most importantly, right? We want to have assets where we’re going to see rental growth over time and of assets we believe are not going to fall into that category, then I think you’ll see us actively prune those over time. Would you add to those?

I think Michael covered it, Jamie. And it’s not a one size fits all answer. It’s very PENN-specific. It’s very industry sector specific in terms of the tenant and what their business is. But I will tell you, we see positive momentum. So number one, people are coming back more and more week to week. Leasing velocity is much higher this year than this time last year. There’s a lot of large deals out there, a lot of large deals, which have been signed and other global banks on the new deal yesterday on the west side. So there continues to be momentum. And I think more and more people are coming back into the office market wanting new space, that’s definitely a theme, recreating their culture in terms of talent recruiting people, improving their brand, et cetera. But I think you’re seeing now what we had predicted last year: it will be an unwinding back to the office. People are now starting to come back, getting more comfortable and I think month to month, it’s continuing to improve out there in terms of the environment.

Jamie, I think in your question, there was implied the culture of work and what the design of space that the employers and the employees want. This is something that our company and our teams have been focused on for a long while. So we believe that the tie and suspenders and striped suit are a thing of the past in the business community today, whether you’re in the finance industry on Park Avenue or whether you’re in the tech industry on the west side. So what we have done, we think, very successfully and tried very hard at is to focus on the hospitality aspect of our buildings and our space. So if you go through the amenity package in One Penn, which is 160,000-odd square feet. So it’s enormous. And one of the strategies that we have is that if you have a cluster of buildings in a campus, you can afford to put – to have a much larger amenity offering than if you have a single building. And so if you go through there, we have food offerings. We have places to hang. We have places to chat. We have gyms. We have health facilities. We have all manners of things. We also have a conference center so that a tenant can take 60,000 square feet and not have to devote 4,000 of those square feet to conference rooms. We have it. We also have co-working space in the building. So we think that that’s the future. And the other part of it is that we want the staff in the building to treat our tenants as if they were guests at a hotel. Know their names, welcome them, greet them and treat them as they want to be greeted. So there’s an entire cultural thing the way work will be done in the future. And this is pretty universal, by the way, not only in New York, but the better owners are sort of doing what we’re doing. We think we’re at the front of it, but we’re not unique.

All right. Thank you for everyone’s thoughts on that. So I guess just following up on Two Penn. Can you talk more about just the leasing demand? I know you signed the big MSG lease, but how do you think that stack works out based on the discussions you’re having? Or do you feel like it’s still just kind of early to have a view on that? And then similarly, there’s just so much buzz around crime and safety around the PENN District. How would you gauge it today versus maybe where it was a year ago and maybe some of the initiatives that could improve it further?

In terms of leasing at PENN 2, the building is at the very top of the list for any user coming into the market looking for either new construction or the very best of the redevelopments in the market. So we’re in continuous meetings with tenants, brokers presenting the asset. But we are in no rush. The bustled structure has just gone up. As each month goes on this year, Jamie, it’s going to just get better, better and better physically. We’ll then start bringing people into the project to get a feel just how unique and spectacular this space will be. So we’re seeing everybody. We’re showing it to everybody. The reception has been A-plus. We’re on every tour of every important client who’s walking around New York for space. As it relates to the district, I think we’re – the streets are noticeably improved from this time last year. We’re, of course, working daily with all the jurisdictions between the NYPD, the Mayor’s office, the business improvement districts, our colleagues and the district, other owners or major tenants, et cetera, and really focused, of course, on safety in the neighborhood. And I do think it has improved year over year. We still got work to do and we’re, of course, on it every day in terms of that mission. But the reception of PENN 2 has been excellent. And at PENN 1, as we’ve said in the remarks, the action is enormous. The rents continue to rise, and we’re seeing tenants coming into the building for tours. They’re coming from every submarket in the city, from Park Avenue, Sixth Avenue, downtown, I mean all over the place, honing in on the district and into this campus amending program that we’re offering.

I would just say, I mean, Glen talked to the year-over-year. I think that quarter-over-quarter, the Streets are better, right? Is the Street, the activity level on the streets has increased more traffic to the station. That is, I think, made the streets feel safer. It’s made it feel better, right, push some of the other elements to the side, maybe out to other areas. So I think you’re I don’t know in the last time you’ve been through district, I know you’re going to walk in the area soon, but I think you’ll see a noticeable improvement. Still work to be done though.

Thank you. We have our next question from Steve Sakwa with Evercore ISI.

Thanks. Good morning. Steve, I was wondering if you could just comment a little bit more about your appetite and desire to still be part of a casino project or licensing agreement. If New York City were able to get one. I’m just curious if you’re looking to be part of the operations or you’re looking to more be of a landlord. And if it’s on the landlord side, how big of an integrated resort do you ultimately think the winning bid needs to be? Does it need to be hotel rooms and convention space? Or do you think it can just be a stand-alone casino kind of in the heart of Manhattan?

Well, some of the answers to your questions are at the current time unknowable. This is going to be a political process and there are going to be government officials who are going to make these decisions. With respect to the idea of a casino, we are aggressively pursuing it as we should and as we must. And I’ve said in the last two letters I’ve written that we believe that the – there are going to be three downstate licenses. We believe that the best place for the third license, one goes to Yonkers, one goes to Aqueduct probably, although that might be contested as well. But we believe that the third license would be best served to go into Manhattan. When you think about it, Manhattan is the center of everything. It’s the center of the hotel industry, the entertainment industry, the restaurant industry, the business industry the theater industry, et cetera. And one of the anomalies is while it’s the economic engine of New York by far, the voting population who is of interest and the political leadership, of course, is not necessarily in Manhattan. So that’s an interesting thing. We are in the process of talking to multiple people as our – and the casino industry operators are talking to multiple landowners. We are in the process of debating whether we would be just a landlord and that we’re just as an understatement, being a landlord or being part of the operation or being a hybrid, which is a landlord with a kicker or whatever. So we’re in the throes of thinking about and talking about and debating the financial arrangements. With respect to whether the winning bid, so to speak, would be a small isolated casino or an entire Las Vegas-style complex with hotel rooms,…

Great. Thank you for that. I guess, second question. Michael, could you maybe just speak a little bit more to the financing markets. It sounds like 770 Broadway is in for refinancing. Can you just maybe give us a sense of kind of where the market is today for kind of mortgage debt. And just give us an update on kind of size and pricing and how that market has changed?

Yes. Look, it’s – anytime you get into periods of volatility, which we’re clearly in right now, you get hesitancy on the part of, I would say, in particular bond buyers, and to some extent, the banks although I think it’s really much more so in the CMBS market. So I think you started the year with a heavy supply of CMBS volume and then you had rates cap out or economic uncertainty that caused the spread to gap out. So you had a bit of a double any both on spreads and rates. CMBS market’s open, but if you don’t have to issue in that market in size, it’s probably a market you prefer not to going to right now, and we don’t need to go into that. So 770 will end up getting done in the bank market. It’s an asset that’s – it’s a high-quality asset with a great tenant and so well received in the bank market and we’ll roll that over at a spread. I think pretty comfortable to where we’re at today on that building. So spreads aren’t where they were 6, 12 months ago, but still attractive for high-quality assets. And as I said, I think the bank market much more liquid than the CMBS market, but that can only handle so much. So again, our assets on a one-off basis, there’s good demand in both markets, but for 770, it’ll go in the bank market, which I think has more stability right now.

Fixed or floating.

So given the bank market…

Steve, I’m going to ask a few questions now. Fixed or floating?

Well, given it’s the bank market, it will be a floater, but we’ll likely as we’ve done in a number of other situations, swap that out for portion of all the terms. I don’t have anything else in the financing market. Hopefully, that answers your question. I mean beyond 770 – we don’t really have any other material finance. We had a couple of small things will get done, but no other material financings for 2022 and 2023. So that’s – we did a lot of that opportunity last year. We obviously had a number of maturities last year. So even notwithstanding the markets, we really didn’t anticipate being very active in 2022.

Got it, okay. Thanks.

And thank you. Our next question is from John Kim with BMO Capital Markets.

I think you just answered my question. But Steve, in your opening remarks, you did mention that having a high floating rate strategy works 10 years and rates will come back down again. So I just wanted to confirm that you’re comfortable maintaining a high floating rate strategy in the near-term.

Yes. We think we spent a great deal of time on our balance sheet is very important. Liquidity and safety and the ability to be defensive, but even more the ability to be offensive is extremely important to us in running this business. So every time that you look at a financing opportunity, the – if you compare a floating rate debt to a 10-year fixed rate debt, the spread is enormous. It goes to, what was the 2.5% most 2.5 points, 250 basis points, most of them time. So what happens if you elect to go 10-year fixed, you are for certain costing yourself 250 basis points more. And during the life of over the last 30 years, I think one of the firms that we used as an advisor on financing said every single month for the last 30 years, the right decision was to go floating rather than fixed. So the answer is that you pay 250 basis points or you go floating. Now there’s other parts of it, too. If you’re in a fixed-rate loan, you are locked in. And if you decide you want to sell the building or refinance the building or whatever before the end of the term, you have to defuse that, which is normally a very, very expensive proposition. So it takes away all of your flexibility if you are going to sell or improve or whatever the asset. So and that’s an extremely important thing. Now while we have floating rate on our books now and our interest expense is increasing, if we would have had all of that debt at fixed, it would have been substantially more in interest expense than we are currently paying or we expect to be paid. So we think that the fixed-rate strategy, while it seems safer, it’s for certain much more expensive, for certain much less flexibility, which is why in the heat industry, most folks seem to like the unsecured debt route where you are not encumbering the asset with a mortgage or what have you and you can get that flexibility. But we still believe – I still believe in the floating rate strategy as being a superior strategy.

I’m just wondering with inflation at four-year highs, if there’s a risk that rates could remain higher for longer. And with 770 Broadway in particular, is that contemplated at all to have that as a fixed-rate mortgage for fixed-rate fixing?

I couldn’t understand your question, John, which 770?

With 770, have you decided to definitely have that floating and hedge it near-term? Or is heading…

Yes. The base loan will be a floater because it’s going to be in the bank market, but our intent is to swap that at the corporate level for a period of time.

Okay. And then one final question. With the ground lease reset addressed and the retail guidance already provided, why not provide FFO guidance going forward just given the amount of uncertainty there is in the market and with your company in particular?

The answer is like real estate is a long-term business, there’s a lot of ins and outs. We’re in a heavy development phase generally, and it’s difficult to do. We gave you some preview at the beginning of the year and now we’re walking that back a little bit, given rates. So it’s a difficult thing to do. We’ve given you, I think, reasonable sense for 2022, mid to high-single digits. So that’s – I think that’s pretty good guidance for this year. That’s our best guess. Things change. It’s a fluid business, but that’s our best guess for this year.

And thank you. Our next question is from Alexander Goldfarb with Piper Sandler.

Hey, good morning. Good morning, Steve. So a few questions here. The first is, you guys had the $1.7 billion of cash. You bought some T-bills, but why not use a portion of that cash to pay down some of the floating rate debt as opposed to just buying the T-bills?

Alex, the – good morning.

Good morning. Good morning, Michael.

The answer is we did deploy some of that cash in T-bills in order to get some of the benefit of earning more than what’s in the banks. And a lot of that capital is still left we intend to deploy into our development activities in PENN. Since the quarter end, by the way, we put a little bit more in T-bills. Those are staggered maturities, six, three, nine, 12 months. But a lot of the capital is going to go into PENN 2 and to finish up what was left at Farley and PENN 1. So that’s the rationale in terms of why it wasn’t all the flows in all pay down debt. In New York, you have the additional issue on the mortgage debt, you do have mortgage recording tax, which costs you 3%. If our intent is to have financing on those assets over the longer-term, right, that would be wasted money that we’ve paid once before that we would never have to pay again. So we don’t want to do that lightly.

Alex, in this market, where the financing markets are extremely choppy and hostile, if we pay down short-term debt, replacing it if we need the capital later on is going to be more difficult. The other strategy is you can hedge it. And if we take the cash, which we need and we have places for and it’s all allocated in our capital plan and our budgets. And so if we pick cash and hedge it by my treasuries, so let’s say, we can arbitrage it. So the interest expense on that particular slug of capital is 100 basis points less than we would earn on the treasuries. So 100 basis points, let’s say, on $1 billion is $10 million. That’s a lot of money, but it doesn’t move the needle. So I’d rather have the liquidity rather than pay down the debt and not be able to replace it easily and quickly when we need it. So I think we are…

Yes. That’s helpful. And as we look – Michael, as we look at the – I know that you’re not giving distinct guidance, but from the $0.81 run rate that you gave in fourth quarter, you’re now having an extra $750 million of disposed higher interest rates. There’s a ground lease reset. So just sort of ballpark, are we talking an extra $0.05 lower from that number, an extra $0.10 lower than that number? It sounds like the number is lower given all these moving pieces, but you guys did bake in a fair amount into your guidance when you did say $0.81 despite Facebook coming online. So just trying to get a gauge for collectively how much off of that $0.81 run rate we’re looking at.

Yes. I don’t want to be that precise, Alex, just because, again, we’re in a fluid environment. I mean we did assume originally at the beginning of the year the LIBOR was going to go up. The curve is steeper today. So it’s up – look, we don’t know where it will end up, but it’s certainly steeper than what we originally projected. The $750 million of sales, there’s not tremendous earnings that are coming off a lot of that. So I don’t think that’s going to have a huge impact. There are a lot of the smaller assets that are not producing a lot of capital. So there’s a lot of earnings, so I don’t think that’s material. But in terms of – look, I think we gave you a range, mid to high-single digits, and you can sort of deduce the run rate depending on what you plug in for that coming off of the $286 million last year.

Alex, I’m going to go out on a limb and my financial guys are going to whip me, so…

They would never whip you, Steve. The whipping goes the other way. The whipping goes the other way, Steve.

No, no, no. Let’s get serious. Our internal budgets, which are highly detailed and revised frequently show that with interest rates rising, even rising at a faster rate than we had expected as recently as three or four or five months ago, by the way, I believe that – as I said in my remarks that the economy is now in the hands of the Federal Reserve as it should be. The Federal Reserve makes business, they always win. And they will handle inflation, and this too will pass. But anyway, so our internal budgets, which are expensive show that even with the One Penn ground lease reset and even with a reasonably predicted rising interest rates taken off the yield curve – and by the way, 95% of the time the yield curve exaggerates the actual facts. So that’s another statistic, we believe that we – our earnings will grow through and we will have maybe wanting a couple of years out as – but otherwise, our earnings are going to grow right through it. Now I’m going to give you something that I know they’re going to whip me for. Our budgets show well in excess of $300 million a year of NOI coming in from Farley, One Penn and Two Penn above our current numbers over the next period of time. Your job is to predict what the period of time is, okay? My job is to get those earnings. It will not come in a quarter or even a year. But during the – as we complete this program, without touching another piece of land in the PENN District, our earnings will increase by well over $300 million just from those three projects.

That’s annually or aggregate?

Annually.

$300 million?

Now that I said that, I’ve got a lot of people throwing knives on me in here.

And I thought some…

That’s the math, okay.

Okay. Steven, if I – no, that works, Steve, if I can end on a high note, the studio business that you’re contemplating with an operator, would you be just a landlord? Or would you be active in the participation of those studios?

Well, the answer is that it’s going to be a development deal in New York, that’s what we do. We do better than anybody. So we will be – we’re a full partner. We’re a full decision maker. There’s a skill to designing these things so that the customers and the tenants – they work for the customers and the tenants. So we hooked up with a very talented experienced operator and he’s going to do his part. We’re going to do our part. And we think it will have a very fine result. We believe that studios in Manhattan are a unique asset as opposed to studios in the boroughs or across the river or down or somewhere else.

And we have our next question from Daniel Ismail with Green Street.

Great. Thank you. I’m just curious, given the discussion of interest rates and the plan to dispose of $750 million through the course of the year, how do you think that’s impacting cap rates both overall and on the assets you’re looking to dispose of.

Daniel, it’s – in terms of what’s the impact, I think it’s too early to tell. Look, if financing rates are higher, is it going to impact cap rates, certainly. But it depends on where rates settle out and so forth. So I think it’s too early to tell, but it will have some impact. Sure, it will affect the $750 million. The answer is a lot of those are small assets. Some are value-add in nature. I don’t think it’s dependent on the last basis point is where somebody borrows. So I think we have a pretty good sense as to where we can execute that, but we didn’t necessarily say it was going to happen all this year. So I want to just clarify that if you said it. Certainly planned to go into the market this year. But when it will close, TBD. So I think, Daniel, we’ve got to wait and see. This is – if you’re financing literally in this market right now, I think you’re paying more than you probably will. I mean if you look at the financing markets historically, as rates rise, spreads do tend to compress somewhat so that the all-in rate doesn’t go up basis point for basis point. We’re in an environment right now given the uncertainty that’s existing with what exactly is the Fed going to do, what’s going to happen with the economy, et cetera., where spread the gap out, rate expectations have risen. So it’s not a great market to be borrowing in. I think that will change as we get – as it settles down here. And so what the impact on cap rates will be TBD. But look, if borrowing rates are up, it will have some impact.

Daniel, I would much rather have put these assets on the market two years ago when interest rates were lower. But it is what it is. It’s the right strategy for our company to sell these assets if we get 3% more – higher price or 4% lower price at the margin, it just doesn’t matter. These assets are for sale and we will execute.

Got it. That makes sense. And thanks for the clarification on the timing, Michael. Just a last question for me on PENN District and rezoning, there’s been a variety of news articles going back and forth about the potential additional density there and the states versus the cities plans. I’m just curious, can you give us an overall update as to what’s going on with any potential rezoning and any potential timeline on that as well?

You’re talking about the GPP and PENN District?

I am, yes.

Yes. I think we’ll stand pat on that. I mean, this is a – basically, the City of New York and the State of New York are partners and government. The MTA and the transit is basically a state asset, the capital plan that will be expended and Penn Station is basically state capital. So it makes lots of sense and there’s multiple, multiple historic precedents for this for the state to be in – I’m going to use the word in charge, that’s really not an accurate word, of the zoning and the development process. The city at the state are cooperating on that. There’s been extensive public hearings on the plan and the proposal. The political leadership in terms of the governor and the mayor have both endorsed the plan. And I think that’s about all that I have to say about it. Obviously, we support it.

Got it. Appreciate the color.

Thank you. Our next question is from Ron Kamdem with Morgan Stanley.

A couple of quick ones for me. One is just on sort of the CapEx. I think you mentioned in the K that you were looking for about $275 million this year. 1Q sort of a $36 million range. Just – I know you talked about the leasing pipeline that’s potentially accelerating, but just how are you thinking about CapEx more for the rest of the year.

Michael, I don’t know.

That I would say on the $235 million, I mean I’ll let Glen comment on the CapEx for the rest of the year. It depends on whether it’s a new lease, renewal lease, the $235 million is that’s our best estimate at the beginning of the year based on both what’s in process and what we expect to come down the pipe, right? It’s obviously dependent on actual transaction volume. And so while this quarter was lower, obviously our leasing volume is lower as well, and we talked about being significant. So that number will normalize. I wouldn’t vary from the $235 today. I think we’ve commented on the tenant improvements generally having stabilized higher than we like, but they’ve stabilized. They’re not going up any further. What else would you add to that?

Look, the leasing quarter-to-quarter, it’s always very fluid. We’re always looking ahead, blocking and tackling way ahead of our expirations, creating opportunities in the buildings on core value with all releases coming up, whether it’s this year, next year or two years or even further away. So it’s really not a completely predictable quarter-to-quarter number. But certainly, the TIs, we definitely believe have stabilized and that’s always due to the mix quarter-to-quarter of the new deals and expansion deals weighted against renewals.

Got it, okay. All my questions have already been asked. Thank you.

Thanks, Ron.

We have our next question from Caitlin Burrows with Goldman Sachs.

Hi there. Earlier, you mentioned a lease at PENN 1. I was just wondering, was that included in the reported 1Q leasing spreads? And if so, could you share what New York Office spreads would have been excluding it?

The answer was – I’m sorry, you’re saying on the – you’re talking about the stats for first quarter?

Yes.

Yes. If you exclude the PENN 1 deal because not all the leasing activity in PENN 1 had a mark-to-market to it. The high-single digits would be low-single digits. So it’s still positive. It was in that 3% to 4% range.

Okay. Got it. And then…

It involve the PENN 1 deal.

And then just regarding the ground lease at 330 West 34th and the increase there. I was wondering if you could go through how much of a catch-up of retroactive payments does this represent versus the amount you had been accruing while it was in arbitration and whether this will impact financials going forward?

That’s all been recognized and trued up already.

Okay. Okay, thank you.

That happened last quarter, I think. Yes. Thank you.

And thank you. We have our next question from Vikram Malhotra with Mizuho.

Thanks so much for taking the questions. Just maybe first to clarify. Can you confirm was the Farley and Facebook specifically, was that recognized GAAP revenue, was that recognized in 1Q? And if not, when will GAAP and cash be recognized?

Yes. Vikram, that was recognized first quarter. GAAP cash will be at some point in the second quarter.

Okay. Great. And then just more broadly on street retail, can you help us just understand where you think we are in this rent correction cycle now specifically on Fifth Avenue and Madison in terms of occupancy costs and what you’re hearing in terms of specific demand for some of your vacancies on Fifth?

Vikram, we’re just coming off the bottom. And so what – and I think I alluded to this in my recent letter. If you go back 18 months ago, there was no demand, no tours, no interest whatsoever in prime, prime, even in prime, prime, prime retail on Fifth Avenue. That’s changed. There is now a fair amount of demand, but it is still at what I call characterized the bottom fishing pricing. What we expect is, and this is the way markets generally work. The vacancies will be absorbed at low rents. The markets will get tighter business, and this happens over some period of years, business will improve, demand will accelerate and the rents will go up. And we are right now at the point in the beginning of that market cycle where we’re just coming off the model.

Okay. Great. And thanks so much. And then just last question, your updated thoughts on co-working and WeWork specifically in your tenant roster. How are you thinking in this, I would say, not new, but maybe evolving environment? What’s the room for co-working in your portfolio, either your own or partner’s?

Hi, it’s Glen. So we certainly think there is a long-term role for co-working flex space in our portfolio. And we’re seeing great success early already at PENN 1 with the 80,000-foot co-working operation we’ve opened up there earlier this year. We expect to roll more of that in the portfolio as we go building to building. So I think certainly, there’s a role. There’s certainly a need out there for more short-term flexible space opportunities. One thing we’re seeing at PENN 1 specifically is that our existing tenants in the district are utilizing the facility to their benefit as it relates to folks coming in for short-term projects from out of town or if they’re reconstructing their space in one of the buildings or coming into our co-working facility to park themselves there to operate their business while they’re rebuilding. We’re even seeing cases where new leases we’re signing where tenants want to home now while they’re waiting for their space to be built. They’re coming into PENN 1 operating there with us as they wait for their space to be built. So I certainly think there’s a role, and I certainly think what we create at PENN 1 is by far the best operation in Manhattan. And we expect to roll that out more and more in the portfolio as we see those opportunities arise.

Kudos to Barry and Glen for creating our amenity package in One Penn and the co-working space. We believe that co-working is – as an asset class is here to stay. The interesting thing is the strategy of how you use co-working. So we put a 80,000 feet of co-working space into One Penn. And you got to remember, that’s in a 4.5 million-square-foot complex. We believe that for our clients, whether they be an existing tenant in PENN 1 or PENN 2 or an entrepreneur that is looking for space or in the neighborhood that the advantage of having that co-working facility inside our complex where they have a huge amenity package that they could use, they have gyms, they have food, they have other offerings. They have conference centers, they have everything that they could possibly want is an enormous advantage. So our strategy is in 4.5 million-square-foot complex to put the better part in round numbers, 100,000 square feet of co-working, which is available to our tenants and to the neighborhood as well, and they can use all of the facilities that are in this massive complex. So we think that, that’s a competitive advantage than going into a co-working space that’s seven blocks away and has 80,000 square feet of couches and nothing else. That’s our thinking.

And this concludes our question-and-answer session. I will now turn the call over to Steven Roth for closing remarks.

Thank you all very much for participating. We look forward to the next call, and we will see you then. Thank you, and have a great day.

And thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes our conference. We thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.