Good morning. My name is Darren, and I will be your conference operator today. I'd like to welcome everyone to the Virtus Investment Partners Quarterly Conference Call. The slide presentation for this call is available in the Investor Relations section of the Virtus website at www.virtus.com. This call is also being recorded and will be available for replay on the Virtus website. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference to your host, Jeanne Hess. Please go ahead.

Thank you, and good morning, everyone. On behalf of Virtus Investment Partners, I would like to welcome you to the discussion of our operating and financial results for the third quarter of 2014. Before we begin, I direct your attention to the important disclosures on Page 2 of the slide presentation that accompanies this webcast. Certain matters discussed on this call may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are not statements of facts or guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the statements. These statements may be identified by such words as expect, anticipate, believe, outlook, may and similar terms. For a discussion of these risks and uncertainties, please see the Risk Factors and Management Discussion and Analysis sections of our periodic reports that are filed with the SEC as well as other recent filings, which are available in the Investor Relations section of our website, virtus.com. In addition to results presented on a GAAP basis, Virtus uses certain non-GAAP measures to evaluate its financial results. Our non-GAAP financial measures are not substitutes for GAAP financial results and should be read in conjunction with GAAP results. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the applicable GAAP measures are included in our earnings press release, which is available on our website. For this call, we have a presentation, including an appendix, that is accessible with the webcast through the Investor Relations section of virtus.com. Today, we will begin with remarks from President and Chief Executive Officer, George Aylward, who will review our operating results and accomplishments for the quarter. Mike Angerthal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, will then discuss our financial results in further detail and will also review the balance sheet and capital position. We will conclude by operating -- by opening the call to your questions. Now I would like to turn the call over to George Aylward. George?

Thank you, Jeanne, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate having you on our call with us today. Mike and I are pleased to have the opportunity to talk about our financial and operating results, which were strongest by the challenging market environment in the latter part of the quarter. Increasing concerns regarding the sustainability of global growth and the anticipated rise in interest rates resulted in heightened volatility and negative returns in most of the major market indices near the end of September, and that has continued in October. Despite this, we generated positive net flows across asset classes and achieved our highest levels of average assets, revenue, operating income and margin. These results illustrated cumulative benefit of asset growth and our leverageable and variable cost structure. Long-term assets under management excluding money market assets increased 11% to $59.5 billion over the prior year quarter. Regarding the money market funds, as we pointed out in the press release, they were liquidated in October. These funds were low-fee, noncore and an immaterial part of the business. We made the decision that the economics and requirements to offer money market funds were not compelling, so we exited that business. In terms of asset flows, we had positive flows for the quarter of $0.5 billion, with $0.7 billion in open-end mutual funds, which were balanced with positive flows across the major asset classes. International equities had higher positive net flows in the quarter, due to both an increase in sales and a lower level of redemptions for the Emerging Markets Opportunity Fund. Clients have benefited from the fund strategy of investing in high-quality companies that are expected to grow earnings faster than the market over the long term. The fund continues to deliver strong relative performance in all time periods. The continued positive…

Thank you, George. Good morning, everyone. Today, I'm going to review our quarterly results starting with assets under management, sales and flows. And then I'll review our financial results and discuss our balance sheet and capital position. Starting on Slide 7, assets under management. We ended the quarter with long-term assets of $59.5 billion, which represented an increase of 11% from the prior year and a 1% decline from the prior quarter. The $6.1 billion year-over-year increase is attributable to $4.6 billion of market appreciation and $1.5 billion of cumulative positive net flows. On a sequential basis, the decrease in assets reflects market depreciation of $1.1 billion, partially offset by net inflows of $0.5 billion. Market depreciation in the quarter represented a blended return of negative 1.7% on beginning of period assets under management in a quarter when most of the major equity market indices were down. For example, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index was down 3.5% and the Russell 2000 Index was down 7.4%. Our blended return compared favorably as a result of our balanced and diversified asset base that includes 27% in fixed income strategies. Closed-end fund assets ended the quarter at $7.6 billion, an increase of $1.2 billion or 19% over the prior year, primarily due to the Duff & Phelps Select Energy MLP, or DSE, closed-end fund that was launched in June. In the third quarter with the addition of leverage and the underwriters' exercise of the over-allotment option, we added $231 million in assets to bring DSE up to $700 million at September 30. As a reminder, assets added through leverage are not included in our flows. As mentioned in our press release, last week we liquidated our 3 money market funds, which represented a noncore component of our business. At September 30, 2014, the…

Thanks, Mike. So that concludes our prepared remarks. Now let's take some questions. Darren, can you please open up the lines?

[Operator Instructions] Question is from the line of Michael Carrier from the Bank of America.

First question. Just on the flow outlook and some of the trends that you've been seeing. I just want to focus on the AlphaSector products. And just given some of the issues that have been out there with the subadvisor, just wanted to get an update on how you guys had been working with your distributors with the platforms and how that's been going; and probably more importantly, at this point, any of the questions or the concerns that clients are having versus understanding what the product is, what they're in it for; and as long as the performance is there, you still have demand and interest for it.

Sure. There's a couple of things there. So just in terms of sort of flows and what we're sort of seeing there, right now, as I sit here, in October -- I think everyone would join me in saying October has been a really challenging month in terms of what we're seeing in the equity markets, and how investors have reacted. So right now in terms of what we're seeing in October, it is really about what are the equity markets doing; what is volatility doing; and how are individual investors reacting to that; and just as importantly, how our financial advisers thinking about repositioning their portfolio? So a lot of what we see, at least as we sit here right now, in October, that really is the big thing. As it relates to some of the AlphaSector strategies, there's really not a lot I have to obviously add in terms -- as it relates to the subadvisor for that fund. It's all been in the media related to that. But as you look at those strategies, again, they're domestic equity strategies, so they will be looked at in terms of being domestic equity strategies. And I think as you sort of allude to, these are risk-managed products. And the financial advisers who have utilized them and have utilized them in their clients' portfolios utilize them as generally a risk-managed portion of the portfolio. And we'd like to think -- and the way that these should be looked at is in terms of risk-adjusted statistics, so in terms of standard deviation, Sharpe ratio or max drawdown. And if you look at the biggest -- the largest fund, which is the Premium AlphaSector in terms of, again, standard deviation, Sharpe ratio and max drawdown, since those funds were launched, they're in literally the top decile of all 3 of those metrics and fit really well into a portfolio that you're looking at from a risk-managed perspective. As it relates to the other aspects of what's been going on there, obviously, all the firms are very well aware of what's going on, as are all of the financial advisers. Again, this is something that has again been out in reported media in October last year, May of this year and then obviously again in August. Again, the product is doing what it should be doing. The performance is -- would be in line with our expectations of what a risk management strategy would do, particularly in what has been up until now a prolonged bull market. But again, the bigger backdrop that we're sort of seeing right now in terms of flows is what's going on with the equity markets and how are investors going to react to that.

Okay, that's helpful. And then just as a follow-up, on the liquid alt products to -- I guess, I just wanted to try to understand. Once the products are on most of the platforms, and let's just say it's by year-end, then from your guys' perspective in terms of what you can do from a marketing, from an educational standpoint, when will we expect that process to be ramping up? And then obviously we'll try to gauge the organic growth and the flow outlook. But just want to get a sense on the timing of that?

Yes. No, great question. And again, just in terms of our liquid alternative funds. So we launched them, I think it was late April, and there's always, say, a 6 months to 12-month period to sort of get them through the vetting that is done at the distributors in terms of allowing new products. And obviously, the more complex a product is, the longer it takes. And these are multi-strategy, multi-manager funds. So they are available, as I indicated, at some of the independents, and we still continue to expect that they'll be available at some of the larger distributors by the end of the year. So that's just sort of timing for that. The way I would look at the opportunity, and I think what we said and I believe pretty much anyone who's doing these types of strategies has been indicating, is that the demand has a very high potential. Because I think everyone believes that retail investors should move beyond some of the traditional asset classes and have strategies that have a different type of correlation in different types of markets. And I think, as you know, we sort of have 3 offerings: one, which is a total solution in terms of just a core non-correlated type of nontraditional fund; and then we have an inflation product; and an income product. So again, we think that demand is there. I think this actually dovetails back to what's going on in the markets. Because again, some of those products and how they're expected to perform will have different levels of interest depending upon how volatile the markets are and how investors are thinking. So -- but it is something you need to educate people on because these are products that may not behave in the way that people…

Yours question is from the line of Michael Kim from Sandler O'Neill. Michael S. Kim - Sandler O'Neill + Partners, L.P., Research Division: First, just to follow up on F-Squared, any updates on the SEC investigation? And then from your perspective, do you have any sort of time line as it relates to your relationship with F-Squared? So any thoughts on sort of potential AUM at risk or the costs involved if you were to make a change to maybe some of the sub-advisory agreements?

Yes. And I really have nothing to add again. You've seen what's been in the media related to that. So I have no updates or anything to provide. And to be honest, I'm not going get into hypotheticals in terms of assets or all that. The funds are continuing to do what they're intended to do, and that is really what we consider very important in terms of the financial advisers understanding how to use those products in their portfolio. Michael S. Kim - Sandler O'Neill + Partners, L.P., Research Division: Okay, fair enough. And then not to beat a dead horse, but just in terms of the outflows from some of the AlphaSector funds in September and October, was that more a function of slowing sales or rising redemptions? Or maybe a combination of both? And then looking ahead beyond the AlphaSector products, which strategies might be in a position to pick up some of the slack, if you will, even should the broader market volatility persist?

Well, just in terms of flows and what I had alluded to in my prepared comments, is what we saw in September, the sales for the 2 big domestic products were actually unchanged, essentially. I think there was a 1% difference between sales in August versus September. But absolutely, we did see days of negative -- of redemptions that were greater than inflows throughout that period that resulted in the modest outflows. So we saw that particularly in the second and third weeks of September for that. October, I would actually look at very differently. I mean, October -- and I'm assuming all of our peers are sort of seeing the same thing. With some of those incredibly volatile days and particularly those real negative days, we were basically seeing, across the board, equities just having a bad day. And then the next day when the equity markets roared back, you had a really good day in all products. So we're seeing some days of positive and negatives in all of our equity products. It's not specific or related to the AlphaSector products. In terms of what opportunities are, the point of the -- of having risk-managed strategies like these is that they do have a place in a portfolio. They actually -- in an up, up, up market, you're generally going to have a different experience. So these could be based upon their -- the way they perform could be very attractive as things get more volatile. But obviously, there's a lot of other circumstances that will sort of impact that. So I'm not going to give any hypotheticals on where I think we have the potential in terms of gathering flows on that. Michael S. Kim - Sandler O'Neill + Partners, L.P., Research Division: Okay. And any sort of -- aside from AlphaSector Fund, any strategies that you think might be better positioned in this type of environment?

Again, to the earlier question on alts, I think alts have a great opportunity. And fixed income, I made a couple of references to Newfleet. And I think you've heard me say before, I truly believe that Newfleet is one of the most differentiated fixed-income managers in what they do in terms of playing in the 14 sectors of fixed income, I believe is very differentiated. And the flagship product, the Multi-sector Short-Term Bond Fund, I pointed out the stats, I mean, for over -- and actually, I think it goes back over 20 years or 20 years that fund has done incredibly well at all types of interest rate environments. So we think it's just a really great and it's a compelling story. And it's a complement to some of the other mega funds, for lack of a better word. And I think there's a great opportunity for a strategy like that not only in the environment, but as there are opportunities for people that are sort of rethinking what some of their fixed-income allocations are. And as we also noted, we now extended that product line. Again, we have the Multi-Sector Short. We have an intermediate. But there's the sector-specific funds of senior floating rate, EM and high yield. And even though I've referred to the original fund as the original "unconstrained" bond fund, the new offering, the Strategic Income Fund, actually is a very similar fund, except that it goes further in terms of taking advantage of their ability to pick the right sectors by allowing them to go short. So I've always said that some of those funds and strategies are personally my favorite. And I do think that there's opportunities, particularly when there's some volatility in [indiscernible] markets. And when you're dealing with the shorter-duration fund and you have a different risk in terms of interest rates, I think those are good opportunities. And then obviously, Vontobel and the emerging market. And again, as you know, our offerings are actually overweight products that are either high-quality oriented or downside protection. So in certain volatile periods, some of our managers in Vontobel generally has a high-quality orientation, which in certain kinds of markets will sort of be countercyclical to how some other managers manage. So I think we have opportunities there. Our global REIT. There's a whole bunch of things. And that's why we're pleased. In the quarter, you see we have strong offerings in fixed income, domestic equity and international equity. And hopefully with increased availability, we'll have them on the alt side, too.

Your next question is from the line of Tom Whitehead from Morgan Stanley.

Just wanted to focus on the margin for a second. You said -- I believe you said 3Q is a good illustration of the expense structure and the type of ratios we can expect. Could you maybe, I guess, give us a little more detail on that? Maybe highlight where you think you'll be able to get some of the operating leverage in the business to get up to that high end of that 50% to 55% range. And then within that, if you could help us frame employment expenses into 2015. What sort of growth we should expect maybe kind of a fixed versus variable split out there?

Yes. No, so what we were alluding to is in looking in this quarter, we're not pointing out a lot of, in the operating lines, any unusual things. And remember last quarter, we had a bunch of noise related to new product introductions and the timing of annual equity grants. So actually, the reference is there's not a lot of unusual things in the line items or expense ratios in the operating and the numbers that Mike always highlights are really the employment expense compared to revenue as adjusted and the same thing for other operating expenses. So the ratios we're talking about are you have a pretty good employment ratio and other operating expense ratio that we don't have to point out anything for you to sort of adjust. So we think that those numbers are good. Obviously, resulting in the overall non-GAAP margin of 51%, which we believe is a really strong margin. The 50% to 55% that you're alluding to is over past calls we've sort of -- Mike has given some thoughts on what is the capture ratio or how much incremental margin are we pulling from growth in revenue, and we've sort of guided to that kind of level. So now we're at the 51%. But again, a lot of that -- and that will be very heavily influenced by what's going on in the equity markets, right? Because with any kind of market dislocation, that could be impacted. And obviously, any kind of onetime expense thing could impact that. But as we continue to capture -- have a capture ratio above that 51% to 55%, it could gravitate up. Mike, do you want to go...

Yes. I think -- It's Mike. I think George articulated it well. We've talked about a range in the 50% to 55% range over the last several years, and we're particularly pleased because this is the first quarter where we've achieved an overall margin within that range. So we think we've achieved a strong level of operating leverage and scale. And I think when you look at the metrics of the employment expenses as revenue as adjusted, they're at a sound level, both that margin and ratio as well as other operating expenses. And as we look forward to the growth of the business or the change in the business looking forward, to your point, in 2015, it's important to know we highlighted that about 60% of our employment expenses are variable in nature. So at the level we're at, we would expect those ratios to sort of stay in a tight band as we're variable and able to grow the company very efficiently. So again, we're pleased with the result this quarter and I think we're well positioned going forward.

Great, that's helpful. And just one follow-up. You laid out kind of your capital return metrics going forward, the 55% there. But if you could maybe, I guess, give us some color on what to expect for the dividend there, when it could step up and the sort of magnitude it could step up. And then also with -- given where the share price is, on buybacks, are you guys going to be opportunistic? Or is it a little more programmatic?

Yes. Well, a couple of things I'd say. So you sort of start with -- what we were referring to is when we look at -- as we generate new capital, so when we see incremental earnings that generate some additional capital, we sort of are targeting a range of how much of that should be used to protect the business in terms of beefing up working capital and how much should be returned. And Mike gave you an indication that it's in the range of 50% to 55% in the return of capital bucket, right? So we already have a strong balance sheet. We're generating additional capital. We're earmarking a portion of that to return because we do fundamentally think that, that is one important thing that we need to do for shareholders. And there -- and there's 2 levers to that, right? There's the dividend and the share repurchases, both of which you're asking about. So for the dividend, as you know, that was recent for us. So we instituted our first dividend shortly. But if you take a step back and sort of say, we're earmarking a certain percentage of the economic earnings we generate and, obviously, if we stick with that ratio and as the numbers go up, we'll adjust accordingly. So that generation -- we sort of think as the company grows and changes can allow for that. In terms of share repurchases, it's really the same factor. So you're dealing with the same set of earnings that we're generating and how much we're targeting. And we do look at that -- and this quarter was our highest quarter of stock repurchases in both dollars and shares. And we already said that, that level -- and the dividend was sort of in line with that 50% to 55% economic return. So actually, that's why you actually saw -- you saw a decrease in our share count because that level -- at that level, it's greater than we're issuing in terms of equity in our compensation plans. We still do fundamentally believe that generally offsetting the equity in our comp plans to offset dilution is important, but we are focused on returning a reasonable range of that incremental capital we're generating in the range that we spoke about on an ongoing basis. Mike, do you want to elaborate?

And Tom, it's Mike. It's important when we think of return of capital, really, that's the evolution of our balance sheet since we've become independent. And our capital raise last year really solidified the balance sheet. And we believe moving our return of capital levels to close to or at industry average is an important step for the company. We've historically been below industry averages in terms of our return of capital as we built up the balance sheet and ensure that the company had the appropriate levels of operating flexibility. So we -- when we look at that 50% to 55% level, we're going to continue to evaluate our return level. And where we are today, I think that's the appropriate level. And the earnings growth is going to certainly drive the level of increase in terms of the form of return, as George alluded to. But again, we think the balance sheet is well positioned and returning capital is one of the important elements of our cash, and we expect to continue to focus on that.

The last question is from the line of Steven Schwartz from Raymond James & Associates. Steven D. Schwartz - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Just I'm getting a little bit confused here on this return of capital thing. We're talking about 50% to 55% of economic income, as you defined earlier. And at the same time, we're talking about keeping working capital to annual spend at 55%, is that correct?

Yes. Steve, it's Mike. And they are kind of 2 -- 2 somewhat separate analyses and the 50% of 55% of the return will be in a given period, so we look at it either in a given quarter, where the ratio could fluctuate. But over an extended period of time, like a year, we'll look at the cash that we generate and target 50% to 55% of those earnings to be returned, with the remaining element to be either reinvested in the business or to evaluate the working capital to spend level, which is the other sort of ratio that we pointed out, which is at 55%. And that's -- that level is really a cumulative impact and a different measurement, where it's really like a point in time analysis rather than an earnings over a given period. So they're somewhat distinct but different elements of what we do with our cash generation in any given period of time. Steven D. Schwartz - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Okay. And then a couple of line item questions, if I could. You discussed share-based comp. I probably would have expected it to come down more since the Board of Directors gets their comp in the second quarter. It really didn't. I mean, it came down a little bit. And then I'm also interested in the expense levels for the consolidated sponsored investment products.

Yes. And the stock-based compensation year-over-year was down a bit. And the primary element in our share based, which we break out on our non-GAAP schedules, are -- we do have a component of our employment expense and our incentive compensation in share-based compensation. So that will fluctuate based on the profitability that the company experiences in any given time. So you'll have a certain level of flexibility in that for a given period of time. With respect to the CSIP expenses, again, we consolidate the CSIPs in this period. You have a full quarter impact of the alternative funds that were launched middle to late in the second quarter, so you have the natural increase of those items. And we think this reflects a good -- somewhat of a run rate, but that level will change based on the third-party assets that are gathered in those funds. And we continue to try and provide additional transparency to investors in our disclosures. There's an appendix page that reflects the company's investment in those CSIPs. So some of the expenses are -- the total fund expenses, we'll continue to try and provide transparency because it's kind of piercing through to what's -- the company's component or element of that CSIP investment that we think is important. But the short answer to your question is this quarter, the third quarter, represented a full quarter's impact on the alt funds, which are as you recall a significant component of the seed program. Steven D. Schwartz - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Yes, that makes sense. And then George, just one for you, something I've been wondering and thinking about. The emerging -- what kind of discussion do you have with Vontobel and Rajiv Jain, with regards, I guess, to closing the fund? I mean, it is -- it got to $8.9 billion at the end of August. It's at $8.5 billion now. I think the soft close that happened in March of 2013, was it $9 billion? Are there any discussions there?

Yes. And as it relates to capacity, the real numbers -- the primary number is what is the total amount in the strategy managed by Rajiv and his team, right? Because what will drive capacity is what is the calculation from the investable universe employing their strategy and how much can they manage without having any degradation in their investment strategy, which is key to both Vontobel as well as to us. So earlier when you saw the soft close, it was at that point that, in total, the amounts being managed in that strategy were at a level that both we and Vontobel agreed was one where we wanted to start limiting that. So -- but that was before there were a lot of changes in that asset class and sort of what was going on, so we then had a reopening of the soft close. And in a lot of ways, because it's an open-end fund, there's normal redemptions, it allows you for replenishment. But we continue to have conversations with Vontobel. Our product people and the team at Vontobel are in continuous dialogue, making sure we understand what their total assets are. But right now, there is still room and opportunity to, again, continue to attract assets in that fund.

Thank you. This concludes our question-and-answer session. I'd now like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Aylward for any closing remarks.

Great. Thank you. And I just want to thank everyone for joining us today. And I know we didn't have time to get to all the questions, and we certainly encourage you to give us a call if you have any other additional questions, and have a great day. Thank you.