Greetings and welcome to Vistagen Therapeutics' Fiscal Year 2024 Third Quarter Financial Results and Corporate Update. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce Mark McPartland, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations at Vistagen. Thank you. you may begin.

Thank you, Doug. Good afternoon, everyone and welcome to Vistagen's fiscal year 2024 third quarter corporate update conference call and webcast. This afternoon we filed our quarterly report and issued a press release providing an overview of our recent third quarter results and our neuroscience pipeline development. We encourage you to review the release, which can be found in the Investors section of the Vistagen website. During today's call, we will make forward-looking statements regarding our business based on our current expectations and information. Forward-looking statements speak only as of today and except as required by law, we do not assume any duty to update in the future any forward-looking statement made today. Of course forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by any forward-looking statements we make today. Additional information concerning risks factors that could affect our business and financial results are included in our fiscal year 2024 third quarter Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2023, and in future filings that we make with the SEC from time to time, all of which are or will be available on our website and the SEC's website. Now with that taken care of I'd like to thank and welcome all of our stockholders, analysts and everyone taking an interest in Vistagen. I'm joined on the call today by Shawn Singh, our Chief Executive Officer; Cindy Anderson, our Chief Financial Officer; and Josh Prince, our Chief Operating Officer. Shawn will provide an overview of our recent results and our progress across our key pipeline programs. A brief opportunity for questions from our sell-side analysts will follow the prepared remarks. I would like to remind everyone this call is being webcast and will be available for replay after completion. The replay link can be found in the Investor events section of the Vistagen website. I would now like to turn the call over to our Chief Executive Officer, Shawn Singh. Shawn?

Thank you, Mark, and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining our call today. Here at Vistagen, we are pioneering neuroscience, with an intention to deliver first-in-class therapies for psychiatric and neurological disorders, where there are few, if any, adequate and differentiated FDA-approved treatment options to satisfy the widespread needs of patients whose mental health and whose well-being are adversely affected by their disorders. Each of our clinical stage neuroscience product candidates is designed with the potential to establish new standards of care and make meaningful differences in how patients manage their disorders to improve their daily lives. Within the last few months, we've seen a renaissance in neuroscience, marked notably by pharma M&A in the neuropsychiatry space, valued at about $23 billion. We are encouraged that novel, late-stage, neuroscience-derived product candidates with differentiated safety profiles have stimulated renewed interest in large-market neuropsychiatry programs with the potential to change lives. We believe each of our clinical neuroactive pherines, led by fasedienol for the acute treatment of social anxiety disorder, is anchored in novel neuroscience and has the potential to produce differentiated product profiles across multiple and diverse large-market therapeutic areas with high need for innovation and high need to transform the standards of care, including anxiety, depression, women's health and other disorders. Today, we'll briefly discuss our progress and plans for three of these -- three of our five pherine assets in our clinical-stage neuroscience pipeline, facadienol, itruvone, and PH80. As noted, our lead clinical-stage program involves fasedienol, and it's aimed at transforming the treatment paradigm for adults affected by social anxiety disorder, or SAD, which currently affects the lives of about 10% of the US adult population, with very high opportunity costs in their daily life. While the prevalence of SAD continues to grow, there's still no FDA-approved, patient-tailored,…

Thank you, Shawn. As Shawn mentioned, I will highlight a few financial results from our fiscal year 2024 third quarter. I also encourage everyone to review our quarterly report on Forum 10Q filed with the SEC earlier this afternoon, for additional details and disclosures. Research and development expense was $4.5 million and $6.9 million for the three months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 respectively. The decrease in R&D expense was primarily due to a decrease in clinical and development expenses related to the timing of such expenses incurred in our Phase 3 trials of fasedienol and FAD. General and administrative expense was $3.8 million for the three-month period ended December 31, 2023 compared to $3.1 million for the prior period. The increase is primarily due to the increase in compensation-related expenses. Our net loss attributed to common shareholders was $6.3 million and $9.8 million for the three months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 respectively. At December 31, 2023, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $126.6 million. I will also note that this afternoon as customary for development stage companies in our sector, we filed a new shelf registration statement on Form S3 with the SEC to renew a previous S3, which was set to expire next month. Shelf registration statements on Form S3 are standard in our industry and are intended to provide us with broad flexibility to improve our balance sheet in the future as may be needed. As a reminder, please refer to our core report on Form 10-Q filed today with the SEC for additional details and disclosures. I will now turn the call back over to Shawn.

Thanks, Cindy. So as we wrap up today's call, I want to emphasize that we are very proud and very excited to be focused on reaching another key corporate milestone in the near term. That's the initiation of our PALISADE-3 Phase 3 trial of fasedienol for the acute treatment of anxiety in adults with SAD. We will progress through the next phases of our core corporate development strategies with confidence in our team's expertise to execute our PALISADE Phase 3 clinical program of fasedienol and SAD, the potential of our robust pipeline for multiple and diverse psychiatric and neurological disorders, and our steadfast commitment to pioneering neuroscience to develop and commercialize truly differentiated treatment solutions. So on behalf of our whole team here at Vistagen, I want to thank you for your continued support.

Thank you, Shawn. Operator, we would now like to turn the call over for questions from the sell-side analysts participating on the call today.

[Operator instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Paul Matisse with Stifel. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, this is Julian on for Paul. Thanks so much for taking our question. Just a quick one for me; are you still planning on doing a repeat dose study for fasedienol in SAD? And if so, would you be able to provide any color on that? Thanks so much.

You bet. Thanks, Julian. Yeah, we are going to do a repeat dose study. It'll be similar in design to PALISADE-3 and to PALISADE-4, and thus obviously by extension PALISADE-2. It'll be smaller and it'll assess the safety and potential benefit of a second dose of fasedienol that is administered within 10 minutes after the first dose and prior to public speaking challenge. So similar study design, similar endpoint, obviously much smaller and the result of that study, part of it is in agreement with FDA, especially as to any potential safety issue, which we don't anticipate any with repeat dosing, but it really could inform the labelling and provide some guidance as to whether or not a second dose administered within 10 minutes, which might be the case in a real-world setting, is safe and as we anticipated, could be again -- could provide any potential benefit for some patients. So we'll prepare to initiate that study in the second half of this year as we've guided.

Excellent. Thanks so much.

Our next question comes from the line of Andrew Tsai with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, thanks. Good afternoon. Appreciate you taking my question. So maybe the first one on PALISADE-3, PALISADE-4, you're employing obviously some studying improvements to those programs. So could it be fair to assume that the SUDS separation in those studies could be even greater than what you saw in PALISADE-2 because as you're mitigating for placebo effect, could you be further maximizing the drug effect?

Well, thanks, Andrew. As you mentioned, we've done quite a few things to further de-risk the Phase 3 program and a lot of lessons learned on the other side of the prior studies and obviously this is not now a study design and an endpoint that sites and investigators are seeing after a pretty long hiatus in the space of a couple decades. So the things that we've done to improve surveillance, improve and further de-risk execution of the program, certainly that's a possibility. But there are a lot of things. If you compare the world in 2022 to where we are today in '24, just at a minimum taking masks out of the equation is a big difference. Having the ability to have in person investigator meetings, have the ability to do things that ensure rigorous adherence to the protocol, very exacting requirements of that protocol consistently across sites. All those things combined have the potential, of course, to improve even on what we've seen in the past in Phase 2 and in PALISADE-2. Josh Prince, you want to add anything to that?

Sure, Shawn. Thank you. Yeah, I think we're very optimistic about our ability to execute a well- controlled study post-pandemic and it's everything that you talked about, but it's also the things that we're able to do in terms of how we work with our CRO. We're putting feet on the ground in terms of our own monitors going to sites in addition to CRO monitors. We have some additional exclusion criteria to make sure that subjects that are coming into the study have the best chance to have positive results or opportunity to have positive results with fasedienol and even things such as eligibility review, making sure that subjects are appropriate subjects before they're going into the Visit 2 and Visit 3 public speaking challenges. So you put all those things together and it does give us a fair amount of optimism moving into PAL-3 and PAL-4 compared to what we had when we were executing PALISADE-1 and PALISADE-2.

Thanks. And maybe a follow-up on the repeat dose study that you're initiating in second half. As we think about the three arms, what are you and the FDA looking for or said in another way, what is positive data to you?

Josh, go ahead and address that.

Yeah, we expect it to be a smaller study. So, it's not at this point, we don't expect to see, power for statistical significance like you would in the PALISADE-3 or PALISADE-4, but it would give us is, is there any is there any indication that for some patients an additional dose within 10 minutes could provide some benefit and that essentially can inform the label. So, at the end of the day for us positive study is we either see that there is some indication that it could be a benefit or we don't, but either way, there's benefit from the first dose.

Yeah, again, it's really the discussions have been circled around informing labelling downstream and also real-world understanding and some of that taken from open label activity where people might think more is better within a short period of time. So first and foremost, we have to check the box on safety, which again we don't think there's much of if any risk there associated with a second dose within that 10-minute window. For those who don't know, there's three arms before a public speaking challenge. Placebo, placebo drug, placebo drug, drug, each of the second doses within 10 minutes of the first and that's up front of public speaking challenges. So again, taking into account possibilities in the real world that people will use the drug a couple of times rather than staggered as the 15-minute study paradigm required or showed. So we'll see how it goes. Again, it's a dialogue. It's nice to be knowing we're talking about potential labelling benefits. So that's how we took it. These remember -- these receptors are activated in milliseconds. So it doesn't take much time to get them moving in the first instance.

[Operator instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Tim Lugo with William Blair. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks for the question and congratulations on the progress. For fasedienol, given a non-systemic, non-abusable profile and with a positive PAL-2 trial, could you look to gain breakthrough status with the agency? Is it something you're exploring? If you were to get breakthrough status, is it something that could impact your development path at all? And in your discussions with the agency, do you have enough maybe I guess preclinical data around abusability or enough animal data around abusability to have that included in the label?

Thanks Tim. Appreciate those questions. So, first as to BTD or breakthrough, look, that's always an aspiration of any company that's got something in a space that we've got. It's always an advocacy matter with the agency. I think, like I said, we just got done doing something we don't think anybody else has ever done that we've seen and we've certainly got a product profile potential that is different than anything that we see out there. We know the agency is worried about the potential high abuse of benzodiazepines given their drug safety communication on that during COVID. We also know that unfortunately social anxiety disorder and other anxiety disorders lead to depression and then lead, unfortunately, with increasing prevalence that we are seeing to suicidal ideation. So we already know we have fast-track. It doesn't mean that you necessarily fall into breakthrough, but certainly something on our mind. And you're right too that it is important whether or not we see this drug as potentially being scheduled. As we addressed a while back, especially with a drug that is administered intranasally, one might think, well, is it is there some abuse potential there? As we know from the preclinical work we've done and that we submitted to the FDA and also clinical work, a large body of work, including the open label study about 500 subjects with over 30,000 doses, we just were not seeing TEAEs or any certainly no SAEs that are usually associated with abuse liability, even in the longer-term open label. Mechanistically, it makes sense because the drug isn't taken up systemically and most importantly, based on the GABA study that we did preclinically and the C14 studies that we did, there's not tissue distribution and direct activity on the abuse liability receptors in the brain, opiate, nicotine, dopamine and the like and not potentiating GABA, like say a benzo would also worked in our favor. So I think we're very confident as we continue to see clinical data support the preclinical data and the whole package that says this is a differentiated safety profile because of the MOA. We're confident in a go-forward where patients could have the ability to access the drug online on a recurring basis with the drug potentially not being scheduled, no REMS. So we'll see how that continues to go, but what we saw in PALISADE-2, again, no TEA, more prevalent than 2%. In the large open label study, nothing more prevalent than 5% other than headache at 8.7%. So that's remarkably different than what we often hear when we're listening to commercials and side effects that are associated with particular therapeutic options.

There are no further questions in the queue. I'd like to hand the call back to Mark McPartland for closing remarks.

Thank you again, everyone for participating on the call today. Again, if you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us by email at ir@vistagen.com or contacting the individuals listed in our press release issued earlier today or the contact section of our website. Again, we also encourage you to register for email updates on our website to stay connected with the latest news from Vistagen and any future events. Thank you for participating on the call today. We appreciate everyone's interest and support. We look forward to keeping you current on our continued progress. This concludes the call. Have a tremendous day.

Ladies and gentlemen, this does include today's teleconference. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect your lines at this time and have a wonderful day.