Good day, and welcome to the NCR Corporation Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2022 Earnings Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Michael Nelson, Treasurer and Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Good afternoon, and thank you for joining our third quarter 2022 earnings call. Joining me on the call today are Mike Hayford; CEO, Owen Sullivan, President and COO; and Tim Oliver, CFO. Before we get started, let me remind you that our presentation and discussions will include forward-looking statements. These statements reflect our current expectations and beliefs, but they're subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expectations. These risks and uncertainties are described in our earnings release and our periodic filings with the SEC, including our annual report. On today's call, we'll also be discussing certain non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP measures are described and reconciled to their GAAP counterparts in the presentation materials, the press release dated October 25, 2022, and on the Investor Relations page of our website. A replay of this call will be available later today on our website, ncr.com. With that, I would now like to turn the call over to Mike.

Thanks, Michael, and thank you, everyone, for joining us today for our third quarter 2022 earnings call. I will begin with some of my views on the business and I will also provide an update on our previously announced intention to separate NCR into two public companies. Tim will review our financial performance and then Owen, Tim and I will take your questions. Let's begin on slide four with highlights. In the third quarter, NCR delivered strong performance that included solid top line revenue growth and significant margin expansion. The NCR team executed very well in a difficult macro environment. Additionally, NCR made significant progress against our strategic initiatives with strong execution across all of our KPIs. We continue to build positive momentum in the business as we made progress on our strategy to NCR becoming a software-led as a service company with higher recurring revenue streams. First, we delivered 8% year-over-year total revenue growth on a constant currency basis and 7% recurring revenue growth also on a constant currency basis in the third quarter. Second, adjusted EBITDA increased 15% on a constant currency basis from the third quarter of 2021. And finally, adjusted EBITDA margin expanded to 19.3% and which represents a 230 basis point increase from the second quarter of 2022. Now moving to the business update on slide five. We had strong momentum across our strategic growth platforms, which support our company's transformation. In retail, we continue to deliver on our strategy to be the retail platform company of choice. During the third quarter, we expanded our partnership with a large CFR chain of over 950 convenience stores and gas stations. They extended their use of the NCR commerce platform and converted to a software subscription adding 5,000 platform lanes. This allowed them to unify the online…

Thank you, Mike, and happy birthday. Our third quarter results represent strong performance in the face of continued macroeconomic impacts of persistently high inflation, rapidly increasing interest rates and a historically strong U.S. dollar. Our global team is weathering this economic and geopolitical chaos by focusing on the things we can control. Our team's ability to simultaneously deliver solid financial results and make strategic progress is commendable and the sustained commitment to our customers and to each other is laudable. So let's begin on slide six with a top level overview of our third quarter financial performance. Starting in the top left, revenue was $1.97 billion, up $71 million. Revenue was up 8% from the prior year, and recurring revenue was up 7% when adjusted for constant currency. The very strong U.S. dollar had an unfavorable impact of $78 million primarily within our retail and self-service banking segments. In the top right, adjusted EBITDA increased $28 million year-over-year to $380 million or 15% on a constant currency basis. Foreign currency exchange rates had an unfavorable impact of $22 million. Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 80 basis points from the third quarter of 2021 to 19.3%. While EBITDA margin sequential comparisons are not always illustrative, the outlook we provided back in April after a very challenging first quarter, described a recovery with sequential EBITDA improvements of $50 million to $70 million for each of the remaining three quarters of the year. On a currency-adjusted basis, our financial performance in the last two quarters achieved the high end of that range. The pricing and cost actions that we described in April are delivering the accretion to profitability that we targeted and needed. In the bottom left, reported non-GAAP EPS was $0.80, up $0.11 or 16% year-over-year. The strength of the U.S. dollar reduced…

Thanks, Tim. As I referenced earlier, starting on slide 13, Tim and I will provide an update on our separation activities that we previously announced a month ago. Let me provide an update on our thoughts on separating NCR into two public company, starting on slide 13. On slide 13, you can see the current five reporting segments at NCR. Going forward, as we separate out our ATM business into a separate stand-alone company, we have worked with our advisers and Board on a plan taking into consideration a number of factors that you can see on this slide. As we work through the alternatives for how to affect the separation, we believe the best path forward would be a tax-free spin-off of the ATM business into a separate public company via distribution of ATM SpinCo shares to existing NCR shareholders. Remember, the timing is expected to be at the end of 2023. By that time, we would expect to have generated cash flow over the next four to five quarters to reduce leverage, we also believe that we could execute our spend in a manner which could also provide deleveraging if the debt markets were still difficult at that time. Going to slide 14. This illustrates the separation of NCR's existing Self-Service Banking business segment and Payments and Network segment to form a new entity via distribution of shares to existing shareholders. Tim will cover more details in his section, but let me share a few thoughts on the steps we have taken to prepare us for this action. NCR has made significant strides over the past five years to transform our company into a customer-first software-led as a services company. The actions we have taken to align our organization around customers and markets will help us move into…

All right. So picking up on slide 15. Here, we show the size and scale of each of the two resulting businesses on a last 12-month basis and then an allocation of our five year strategic growth rates that we described on our Investor Day presentation back in December of '21. This chart is a good jumping off point for modeling the two independent businesses. The top of the page recast the results from the last 12 months into NCR RemainCo and ATM SpinCo. These two businesses have similar revenue basis with higher margin rates and less capital intensity at ATM SpinCo and lower margin rates and more capital intensity at NCR RemainCo. On the bottom of the page, we describe the expected contribution of each of these two businesses to the future performance using our five year growth targets. NCR RemainCo is expected to grow at or slightly above the high end of the six to nine point range, while ATM SpinCo will be at or slightly below the low end of this range. These longer-term growth rates will not be linear as the ramp of as-a-service revenue in both of these businesses could outpace our current expectations. We expect both businesses to grow EBITDA more quickly than revenue. And by default then, we expect margin rates for both to accrete up. NCR RemainCo starts with lower margins than the average and should be able to generate more substantial improvements to margin. At ATM SpinCo, they already have high margins and are expected to post more modest expansion. And finally, we expect lower cash conversion at NCR RemainCo as we invest for higher growth, while cash conversion at ATM SpinCo should be strong and predictable. And turning to slide 16. A Here, we remind you of NCR's current capital…

All right. Thanks, again, Tim. Moving to slide 17 with a - looking-forward conclusion. In closing, our priorities for the rest of the year are very clear. First, in a macro environment, which we still believe is challenging, our team will continue to execute at a high level and build on the strong performance we delivered in the third quarter. Second, we have made significant progress transforming NCR to a software-led as a services company. Our strategic KPIs are trending in the right direction, and we will continue to build on positive momentum in the business, maybe said a different way, these first two bullets are stating that our team is winning, and we expect to continue to win in the marketplace. Third, we are focused on improving our cost structure. As Tim mentioned, we have identified efficiency cost actions to streamline our costs. Fourth, we expect to close out the year with a strong cash flow generation, as Tim referenced. And fifth, we expect - with the expected strong cash flow, we will continue to allocate capital to the highest return opportunities. We will balance the desire to delever with the opportunity to repurchase shares at attractive levels. As a reminder, we have a previously authorized share repurchase program that we can tap. And finally, we are focused on separating NCR into two public companies. We are working through the legal and organizational structures and expect to be in a position to execute the separation by the end of 2023. That concludes our prepared remarks for today. With that, we will open the call for questions. Operator, please open the line.

A couple of questions. First, just to close the loop on the guidance. You'd indicated on the July call that you were comfortable at the low end of the range, and we're obviously implying something for the full year around $1.375 billion, plus or minus, I haven't done the exact math yet. But Tim, I want to be certain. Are the two biggest deltas from July to now the cost of cash and as it pertains to the Payments and Network business and the drop-through in incremental FX headwind from revenue to EBITDA, would those be the two biggest delta buckets, if you will.

Yeah. So on the interest side, we expected back then to have about $25 million of pressure across the year. It turned out to be closer to 80. So we've had $80 million of pressure on interest rates that go through the P&L, through EBITDA at the Payments business, much higher than we anticipated. That absorbed a lot of the range, if you will, the 1.4 to 1.5. On the currency side, currency has gotten an awful lot worse in the latter half of the year. We now think that the full year impact of currency will be $260-plus million on revenue and almost $70 million on EBITDA. And in fact, it's going to be $115 million on cash flow. So currency has become a big issue. We could not have anticipated back then. I think if you project forward Q3 and duplicated in Q4, and you give me a relief for the FX numbers I just described, will be safely in the middle of the range on EPS on revenue and on EBITDA. So I think that guidance was reasonably well thought out. I think it was reasonably well executed against. We've taken out more cost than we thought we needed to, to scramble back and cover some of the escalation and interest expense that you described. Also inflation got a little bit worse. So yes, I hope that helps.

But Matt, let me - this is Mike. Just let me clarify your statements. So - so the range we gave 4 to 1.5. When we give ranges of outlook, it's always and FX. I think most companies do the same. So within that range of 14 to 15 excluding FX, we're clearly within that range for the full year.

Got it. And then just as a follow-up, those leverage projections for remain and SpinCo', how is that treating the $500 million to $800 million of free cash flow you anticipate generating between now and when you affect that transaction?

Yeah, it presumes that about $400 million to $500 million of that gets applied to reduce indebtedness prior to execution of the deal.

And then would it be fair to assume to the extent you overachieve on the low end of that range, maybe closer to $7, $800, \would you plan on using any overachievement for further debt paydown or share buyback at $20 or site?

So I think our shares are a very good value right now. And I would hope that once we start proving out that we can generate free cash flow in the next quarter that we can get to work and buy back some shares.

Got it. Thank you, guys.

And we'll go to our next question from Paul Chung with JPMorgan.

Hi. Thanks for taking my question. So just on the spin, what's been the feedback from your customers kind of across the segments? And then also internally, How are teams [ph] is kind of reacting to the uncertainty here? How are you keeping employees engaged and kind of retention levels high?

Yeah, this is Mike. Let me start with the customer side. And I guess about a month ago, we made the announcement. So I probably talk directly to two dozen C-level executives. I know Owen has done many as well. And I think without an exception, the conversation has been very productive when you walk through - led us to this point in terms of our feeling that we're undervalued in the marketplace and that having - if you look, conglomerate with is multiple businesses underneath the umbrella wasn't doing as any favors. So as we've done that, I literally have done that across this country. I've done over Europe, as I met with clients in Europe. They all get it. They'll also look at our business and say, look, I'm a retail POS buyer or by hospitality or I buy banking services drive by ATMs. And I haven't had a single one with a single concern. On the employee side, it's business as usual managing to change, manage through not only difficult 2022 but also getting ready for a spin transaction at the end of '23. We do every other week calls with all of our employees around the globe. We just got on the road and did six in person town halls, including Belgrade, Dundee, London, Atlanta, Dallas and got in front of people, and I'll tell you the same reaction with the customers when we sit down and have a conversation about what we're doing and why we're doing it. The feedback from our employees has been just positive as it has been from our customers. Our employees don't want to know what it means to them and what's going to happen over the next year, but they totally get it. And again, let's go back to customers. I'll just pass it over to Owen, I haven't had anybody concerned whatsoever from a customer perspective.

I would agree with that, like Mike lot of conversations. It's more curiosity once we explained that this is about our frustration of seeing value creation being appreciated in the market, and it's not about the performance of the business or any other underlying issues. Customers are very quick to acknowledge that. They tell us that through conversations. We just had our latest NPS scores. They came up 10% up year-over-year. So we continue to have really, really strong feedback from the market. And at the end of the day, if we're not distracting internally and creating issues with the customers, that's all they care about right now. And to Mike's point, I think our people are very curious as to why we were doing this. We've talked extensively to them. I think there's more uncertainty from our employees about the general economy and the implications of that than there are to where we're going with our two companies. As we've talked in the past, the majority of our people are already aligned within the businesses that we're separating into. So if you're a developer or a support person in banking or in retail, that's where you're going to be post the spin. So I think they're anxious more about the overall economic conditions, and we continue to talk to them about what we're going to do with the business and are alleviating quickly to some of those concerns.

Got you. And then a follow-up on digital banking, you know, a nice rebound here in registered and active users. You mentioned the Wintrust and other regional banks. Was this kind of a competitive win? And talk about differentiation, how the firm is winning deals? And then how do we think about user growth in the near term here?

Yeah. So with Wintrust bank - with Chicago-based bank and then Associated Bank, which is Wisconsin-based bank, and both of those are $140 billion in asset size, $150 billion. It's very large regional banks. And again, collectively, they brought on almost 1 million accounts. So now we've talked about that literally over the last, I think, six months that we've signed them. It takes a little time to bring them on board. Those conversions are shout out to the team. Those conversions went flawless and when I say the team, \we just cut down meeting with the executives of both of those organizations that was the joint effort between the NCR team, as well as the team from those banks. So those accounts came on board throughout the third quarter. So you saw the accounts, the revenue will be coming on board fully in the fourth quarter. And as you - we talked about double-digit top line growth, you'd expect to see the same with the account growth. So going forward, you should expect to see that really going forward. We talked about that in our last - last year's Investor Day, where we said digital banking, the team has done a phenomenal job of bringing them back to be very competitive. Those were both competitive wins in that $25 billion above marketplace. We have taken more than our lion's share of victories out there, and we expect to continue to do so.

Yeah. The only other comment I'll add on to that is our entire strategy on all the businesses, all the industry is the land and expand. So the wins of the digital banking and those customers is leading to really strong growth in our Terafina business. Mike commented in his opening comments about the performance of our channel services platform those institutions we just talked about are embracing that and we'll add that to the portfolio of NCR offering. So we're seeing great land and expand coming as a result of really strong conversions. The other comment I'd make is, as we talk to the digital banking team and we look out to the fourth quarter, we're looking at perhaps the largest order quarter we've had since actually, it will be in the history of the firm. So we're really bullish. Those will take some time. Those will convert through the first half of next year, but the momentum in that business is really strong.

Great. That's great. Thank you.

And we'll move on to our next question from Kartik Mehta of Northcoast Research.

Hey, good afternoon. Mike, maybe thoughts on shared services or the service business and so retail and ATM. I'm not sure how much they're sharing and how you intend to deal with some of the shared services for those two businesses?

Yeah, Kartik, that's a great question. So as we look at where we stand today on work to go to get to the end of the job next year, but with the spend, you know, the go-to-market side that on one been working on literally for the last four years is really aligned vertically within our lines of business, whether it's retail, hospitality or banking. So most of that work is already done. We have remaining shared services, which are a few on the street to do the break fix to do the service and support for hospitality, retail and for banking and then we've got some - obviously, some corporate functions. So on the shared services itself, the teams have put in systems and automation and actually, a lot of those get deployed out of centralized sites in those centralized sites like Belgrade they already focus on either retail or they focus on the banking business. In the field, we have resources that are dedicated to either, for example, fixing ATMs on a full-time basis as a specialist or fixing SCO self-checkout devices on a full-time basis as a specialist. And then we have some generalists who are certified to do both. So our team has gone through and identified where we'd have to make separation, how we would then handle, whether it's through services agreements from one group to the other or whether in most cases, we have enough scale and mass in the geographic area just to have the generals break into the specialty area. So we think we have a pretty good handle on that. We think we have a pretty good sense of what that means in terms of separating those out and where we - where we'll have some - we recognize there'll be some dis-synergies, but we think that will be quite kept a minimum.

And then, Tim, maybe just thoughts on dis-synergies that dollar dis-synergies that you think spinning out the two companies will create. Obviously, I think the slide you showed just showed EBITDA for both companies and separated by segment. I'm wondering maybe your thoughts on just dis-synergies?

Yeah. So we think it's going to be between $80 million and $100 million of incremental expense to stand up to independent companies. I think $30 million to $40 million of that is just direct public company costs and the rest would be duplication of other parts of the organization. Over the next year, probably next six months, we're targeting some pretty significant cost actions inside the organization to more than offset that $80 million to $100 million. I think we'll have actions in place that are probably twofold that to help us cover that and be ready. So in the model that's described on here in the assumptions and the leverage calculations, we've presumed that we get that cost out and that we're able to cover that incremental expense.

Tim, you said that double – or do you anticipate taking out more than the $80 million to $100 million. So could you actually - with better EBITDA than expected?

Yeah. I think there are two separate topics, right? One is getting ready to split. And in fact, as you described, there will be dis-synergies associated with that. As you know, we went through some cost and pricing actions during the course of 2022 that allowed us to scramble back to a decent performance for the full year. As we enter 2023, we expect another difficult year, and we're getting ready for that. Owen and his team have pulled together some cost actions both those associated labor and others associated with component costs and with freight to help us be productive - generate productivity going into 2023. Those actions are north of $200 million and would more than offset the pressure to pervade [ph] you to 104 the spin.

Thank you very much. I really appreciate it.

All right. Pleasure.

And we'll go to our next question from Ian Zaffino of Oppenheimer.

Thank you very much Just one more question on leverage of the SpinCo remain co, how exactly are you arriving at those leverage rates? Why is that the best? And then maybe on the RemainCo what's the opportunity for M&A, especially vis-à-vis the leverage that you're thinking about spinning it out with. So we expecting more organic growth or M&A growth in that area. Just a little color there would be great. Thanks.

Yeah. So on a leverage perspective, we think that the ATM SpinCo can tolerate more leverage, and we believe that it generates a very predictable cash flow stream. And so it's an obvious dividend payer, and it can carry a little more leverage because it's not as capital intensive. From a RemainCo perspective, we need to keep our leverage under our covenants or existing covenants for the two thirds of the long-term debt that we want to keep in place. That's 3.7. We also want to leave ourselves room to continue to invest for growth in this segment. So we think the right leverage here is to be lower than at ATM SpinCo, they're both, as you can tell, they're both wide ranges. We don't know exactly where we'll fall out in either of these two businesses. But that was the thought process. And on the tax - on the...

On the M&A - let me just address the opportunities for M&A or inorganic growth on the RemainCo. So if you look at RemainCo, it's retail POS, it's hospitality POS and it's the digital banking. We think all three of those areas are growth opportunities in the marketplace. We think the spending will continue as - particularly on the POS side as people have an upgrade imperative, but we've already talked about digital banking being an area that we see financial institutions on the retail side, we focus on the retail side, financial institutions, integrating their channel strategies and our products are very well suited to do that. We have seen, on an inorganic basis over the last four years, we've been very successful. We just talked about Terafina, which is account-opening for Digital Banking, D3, which is a product that was successful in winning Associated Bank and Wind Trust Bank, we've had great success in retail with a company that's virtualization. Cozinstra [ph] we brought a company called Freshop, which does the front end glass, which allows you to integrate it order entry of your mobile device into the grocery POS. So we've had a lot of success of acquiring inorganic products to integrate with our platforms and then upsell cross-sell. We think going into '23, a lot of those companies that maybe are underscaled that have had some success building product, but haven't gotten to a point where they're actually generating earnings or cash flow might be more attractive opportunities for us going forward. So we think RemainCo will have opportunities to grow organically as well as inorganic opportunities.

Okay. And maybe just a little bit of a follow-up there. I mean, I guess that was sort of my point that I do think there's all these organic opportunities or inorganic opportunities RemainCo. So should the difference in the leverage ratios between two companies be actually larger than that to meaning RemainCo should take maybe less leverage and then SpinCo should take on more leverage?

Yeah. I mean, we could turn it in its way. I think it becomes an equation of how much leverage we want to put on SpinCo as we get closer to a date where we look at the marketplace, we've got a build in balance sheet for SpinCo. I think we'd look at that. I don't think we would over lever either company. We want both companies to have opportunities to succeed. And so I think we get your point. I think the other thing to keep in mind, when we have a RemainCo, which is a higher-growth businesses, we would hope to establish a currency using equity to be able to go out and do deals that today we simply can't do. So I think getting that balance right, which company gets how much debt, we'll keep that in mind. But the goals a SpinCo to be stable, steady, cash generating to return some of that cash to shareholders via dividend and then RemainCo to be able to participate in growth organically and inorganically.

Okay, perfect. Thank you very much.

And we'll go next to Erik Woodring with Morgan Stanley.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Maybe, Mike, if I start with you, I guess, we're hearing some mixed commentary from our coverage in terms of the impact of macro uncertainty. And so, can you maybe just elaborate on what you're hearing from customers in terms of time to close deals, any downsizing or pushing out of deals? Is there any caution at all? And maybe if you could kind of detail that by end market or vertical if there is any difference that would be super helpful. And then I have a follow-up. Thanks.

Yeah. Let me start, and then I'll have Owen add some color. So as we look at fourth quarter, we haven't seen that yet. And as you look at our numbers that we actually gave end of the first quarter outlook for the full year, we're hitting those numbers. So we haven't seen a diminution in orders. So I want to talk about digital banking has to have extremely strong orders. Let's say, our strong [ph] business remains strong. Our hospitality business has had a very strong year, continues to remain strong through the fourth quarter. So if you look at it through the end of 2022, we haven't seen that. I think we talk to customers, the same conversation in the public media and the macro trends, people are concerned. We just haven't seen red flags, we haven't seen things pop up that would tell us that our customers are going to slow down ordering heading into '23 at this stage. I think we're cautious like everybody else, looking at the future, but we just haven't seen that hit our order book as of yet. I don't know, Owen, you want to add to that?

Yeah. I would say that from a backlog standpoint, there has not been material pushing out of projects or of implementations. Certainly, there's a lot of chatter about what next year will bring. And I think people have raised the flags. The counter to that is labor continues to be probably the most pressing issue that our customers are talking about. And we sit in a pretty good spot with the technology that we can bring to the table for all three of our industry groups as we address technology to offset labor, both labor cost and the labor in the mix, if you will. I know as we have talked to the major retailers, self-checkout and the supporting systems, software, et cetera, is an investment that they're willing to make and we see that across the board. So as of right now, we're just not seeing delays or a pause in terms of project activity, albeit they are anxious like most of us are as to what '23 will bring. That's why we're taking a pretty aggressive approach on the costs that Tim addressed. We're doing that in anticipation. And if it turns out to be an overreaction, then we'll get the benefit of it. But right now, markets and order activities are not waning.

Okay. That is really, really helpful. Thank you for that. I guess maybe, Tim, just to circle back to the 2022 guide. I just want to make sure when you're talking about assuming 4Q looks similar to 3Q from a revenue and margin perspective, was that referencing sequential change or on an absolute dollar and percentage basis? And then maybe just, again, the second part would that be, can you again just detail - again, you mentioned the FX headwinds and the rental cost headwinds. What are the offsets that you're flowing through to arrive back at this kind of guidance that you've guided to today? Thanks.

Yeah, sure. So sequentially similar, meaning not growth rates, but in absolute values. When we post those, it will be about a 3% to 4% growth rate year-over-year on revenue and about a 12% to 13% growth rate on EBITDA. So I feel okay about that performance. The - back to your question on currency. We now expect looking at FX rates today, currency to impact revenue by $262 million to impact EBITDA by $67 million and it impacts free cash flow by almost $115 million. So when I talk about being in our side of our ranges of $1.4 billion to $1.5 billion on EBITDA or approximately $8 billion on revenue, I think you can see with relief, if you just do the math, I described Q3 to Q4, you add up where we are this year, if you add back those FX effects, we're well within those ranges trending toward the midpoint of some of them.

Perfectly clear. Thank you so much.

My pleasure.

And we'll go next to Matthew Roswell at RBC.

Yes. Good evening. A quick question on the expectation for free cash flow to come back. Is that solely timing differentials? Or is there anything in there with either the macro environment getting better and/or you all doing some sort of cost reduction, et cetera?

Yeah. So I think nothing special has to happen. It doesn't presume any change in the quality of our earnings. It doesn't change very remarkable increase in profitability. In fact, we've just described profitability in the fourth quarter, very similar to the third. We've got $180 million of working capital use of cash this year. There was a year in which I thought we'd hold working capital relatively flat, $157 million used in AR and over - nearly $75 million of using inventory. Those folks who own those efforts to collect that cash tell me they can get that back. And so I expect to get at least $150 million of free cash flow out of working capital in the fourth quarter. We'll also generate other cash in the quarter, I think we'll be north of $200 million, is my best guess. That means there's still another couple of hundred million dollars of cash that should have been generated this year that will likely harvest in Q1 of next year. There is - whether it be incentive compensation programs or the way we funded our 401(k) or some other labor reduction, including severance that gets paid a salary continuation. The P&L benefit of some of those things predates our ability to see it through cash flow. And I expect a lift of $150 million to $200 million of cash flow in Q1 just from those effects.

Okay. Thank you very much.

My pleasure.

And for our last question, we will go to a follow-up from Matt Summerville with D.A. Davidson.

Yes, thanks. Just two quick ones. R&D expense looked like it declined materially year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter to an adjusted $21 million. Am I looking at that correctly? Is that the right figure? And if so, from a run rate of 50, 60-ish, how does that happen?

I don't I don't think that's - so CapEx in the quarter...

R&D, R&D...

Matt, I'll have to get back to you...

Yes...

This is Mike - so I would say from an investment in - in software development and hardware development, which we do a lot of. We haven't changed that at all. So quarter-to-quarter, quarter to quarter, we haven't changed that. So if there's maybe a categorization of CapEx from R&D versus spending and product it's not a business action.

So in fact, I'm looking at it now. The total spend – so the total spend cash spend on R&D is relatively flat. The cap rate has changed. So the cap rate was higher, meaning that more of that spend went to CapEx than OpEx.

Okay. Is that sustainable going forward?

I'd say that it was - the cap rate was understated in the first half of this year. We also changed the profile of the projects that we prioritize to make sure that they were capitalizable, meaning that they had future period revenue associated with them. So I'd argue we're getting more bang for our buck out of CapEx and our cap rate should be reasonably close to the average of two and three.

Okay. And then as my final follow-up, product gross profit margin looked to be flat quarter-on-quarter. I guess that surprises me a little bit. So can you talk about the puts and takes there on the roughly 12% product gross margin? And if you're getting more pricing, while that's not getting better mix seemed to be okay. I mean, your skill volumes look good in retail. So help me understand what's going on with product gross margins? Thank you.

Yeah. I think you're just seeing the cost pressure. We've seen all year long go through gross margin, and we're trying to offset it with indirect costs. So we've been chasing indirect cost all year long to offset pressure on the direct side. Obviously, that doesn't come through gross margin. In some instances, it will, if it's direct, it's in the business itself. But for the most part, all the cost efforts we've taken thus far this year were the things we could control more easily, which is our indirect cost. I think you'll see that switch next year. I think next year, we'll start to see the sub-supply chain relief next year. We've done about as much work as we can do in the indirect cost, still some on putting organize - the two new organizations together. I think we can collapse some cost out there. But ultimately, I think the story of 2023 is going to be direct cost management.

Got it. That's it from me. Thank you, guys.

Sure.

And at this time, I would now like to turn the call back to Mike Hayford, CEO, for closing comments.

Thanks. The NCR team delivered an outstanding quarter this quarter. We had 8% revenue growth and 15% EBITDA growth, both on a constant currency basis. But more importantly, we continued our strategic transformation to a software-led as-a-service company, improving our strategic KPIs across all five business segments. Our success is driven by the efforts of every NCR team member to take care of our customers each and every day and I travel around the globe to Belgrade, Dundee, Prague, London, Dallas, Sabon, Tokyo, Sao Paulo, China, Mumbai and many others, including Atlanta, I see what makes NCR a special it's our employees each and every day. I want to close with a thank you to all of our employees who make NCR work and delivered a wonderful quarter, and thank you all for joining us. We'll see you next time.

And that does conclude today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.