Yes, Scott, great question, and I’ll keep it fairly high level. But I’ll start with this. Dedicated has actually performed very well through the cycle, and that’s exactly how we expected it to, with a couple of exceptions around the margin. So examples of those exceptions, we’ve seen fleet shrinkage across dedicated. So within contractual terms, three trucks, five trucks per fleet kind of shrinkage. And that certainly hurt our defensibility a little bit, because those trucks have to find a home. We’ve stayed disciplined to reference back to an earlier question on the call about increased competitiveness in dedicated on bids this year. We’ve kept our discipline, and as a result, some of those trucks ended up all the way back in one way when we would have preferred that they had found a home within dedicated. But overall, dedicated returns, margins, et cetera, have been sort of as expected in this type of economic backdrop, performing pretty well. One way has been worse than expected. That’s just the simple reality. This one way market is more difficult. It’s been lower for longer. Our spot exposure has been higher than anticipated, and therefore, it has been the predominance of the drag. You couple with that, yes, in the acquisition space, those were predominantly one way plays, but to fill regional gaps within our network. And on the market facing portion of those decisions, it’s been very solid. Our customers have embraced it. We feel like it has absolutely filled out the network in ways that are going to be strategic and important, and we stand by those decisions. But their results have been difficult from a year-over-year perspective, because they’re operating predominantly, actually exclusively in that one way space. And then lastly, in logistics, we’ve talked a lot about, there’s times to where we believe that gaining share and gaining momentum in a space makes the most sense, and doing so and executing with a unified platform that we’ve been working so aggressively on has been paying dividends. But we have digested quite a bit of new business in logistics, and there is nothing like a dedicated implementation cost, I’m not trying to make that case. It’s much shorter in duration, but there is a bit of a digestion that you do as you get the carriers in the roster settled. So those are some of the puts and takes. And that’s why I didn’t shy early on in my remarks, I stated, it certainly doesn’t meet our expectations internally either. But what does is like the way the portfolio is now structured. I know that we’re in the later innings of this cycle and as we come out of it, we’re even further entrenched with a stronger performing dedicated unit than before and a growing and much more relevant logistics business.