Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Winnebago Industries Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2012 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Lisa, and I'll be your operator for today. [Operator Instructions] Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host for today, Ms. Sheila Davis, Public Relations and Investor Relations Manager, Winnebago Industries, Inc. Please proceed.

Thank you, Lisa. Good morning, and welcome to Winnebago Industries' conference call to review the company's results for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 ended August 25, 2012. Conducting the call today are Randy Potts, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President; and Sarah Nielsen, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. I trust each of you have received a copy of the news release with our earnings results this morning. This call is being broadcast live on our website at winnebagoind.com. A replay of the call will be available on our website at approximately 12:00 noon Central Time today. If you have any questions about accessing any of this information, please call our Investor Relations Department at (641) 585-6803 following the conference call today. Before we start, it's my duty to inform you this presentation may contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Investors are cautioned that forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from these statements. These factors are identified in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission over the last 12 months, copies of which are available from our SEC -- from the SEC or from the company upon request. Now, I will turn the call over to Randy Potts. Randy?

Thanks, Sheila, and welcome, everybody, to our conference call. Sarah will get into the details of the financials in a minute, but first, I'll make a few general comments about our fourth quarter and fiscal 2012. We're very pleased with the positive reaction of dealers and retail customers to our new 2013 products. As demonstrated by the growth of our sales order backlog, we've been particularly successful with our Class A products, with a 140% year-over-year increase in forward orders for those products. New entry-level Winnebago Vista and Itasca Sunstar 26HE model were very successful. New model, introduced early in the summer, is allowing price-conscious customers to affordably get into a high-quality Class A product. In the opposite end of the price spectrum, we continue to have tremendous success on our high-line Class A diesel products. The Winnebago Tour and Journey and the Itasca Ellipse and Meridian, particularly the 42-foot tag-axle models, have experienced market share growth. We plan to keep the momentum in our motorized product lines going by enhancing our product development process. This process will use product managers to further strengthen our ability to reduce design cycles and bring innovative products to our dealers' lots and showrooms in a timely manner. Winnebago Industries Towables revenue increased during the fourth quarter. Unfortunately, they were not profitable in the quarter for a number of reasons, primarily due to operational challenges. We're working to correct the operational headwinds and still believe the Towables Group poses significant growth opportunity for us going forward. As a result of the positive response we've received from dealers and retail customers on our 2013 products and as a reflection on the improved RV market, our sales order backlog has dramatically improved over last year, up 116% in motorized and 40% in Towables. We believe that the level of dealer inventory is also lower than what it should be given the improved retail demand for our product. To meet this increased demand, we've been ramping up production and hiring additional employees, increasing headcount by approximately 12% in the past fiscal year. We plan to continue the increase in production during the fiscal year 2013. We're very encouraged by the positive signs we see in the general economy. Past experience has shown that motor home sales mostly correlate to both consumer confidence and new single-family housing starts, both of which are now showing real signs of improvement. We believe that is translating into an improved RV market, with recent dealer and retail shows showing record attendance and increased sales, all of which are very encouraging for the recovery and growth of the RV market. With that, I'm going to turn the call over to Sarah for the financial review.

Thank you, Randy. I'll now review the financial performance of the company's fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. Net revenues for the fourth quarter were $162.5 million, a 24.5% increase from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 (sic) [2011]. The net increase in revenue was primarily a result of the increased motor home deliveries, which were up 233 units, or 21.4%, as compared to the fourth quarter of last year. The other significant increase in our net revenue was derived from our Towable division, which produced an incremental $8.1 million on a year-over-year basis. In the fourth fiscal quarter, we increased gross margins by 350 basis points on a year-over-year basis. Several factors impacted our margins, one nonrecurring and several which we believe will be sustainable. In the fiscal quarter, we recognized a $1.5 million LIFO benefit versus a $900,000 LIFO expense in the year ago quarter, which resulted in a 110-basis-point improvement to quarterly gross margins. This is a noncash benefit, and we do not expect this dynamic to be reoccurring. However, the increased volume in motorized sales, coupled with the ability to better absorb our overhead expenses, allowed us to improve margins by 220 basis points. The margin improvement we experienced in the fourth quarter is also up on a consecutive quarter basis when compared to our fiscal 2012 third quarter. In the third quarter, we achieved gross margins of 7.8%. Excluding the fourth quarter LIFO adjustment discussed a moment ago, the gross margins increased 130 basis points on a consecutive quarter basis. Once again, this is directly related to better fixed overhead costs absorption and highlights the impact of incremental sales on our margins. We did incur $2.7 million of additional expense in G&A in the fourth quarter. The majority of this incremental expense relates to bonuses accrued…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Kathryn Thompson with Thompson Research Group.

First question is on gross margins, and I appreciate the clarity you gave in the prepared comments. And of the roughly 130 basis points that you decided for the consecutive quarter basis improvement, how much was driven by the bump-up in inventory? I know you talked about that you saw about higher inventory levels. And then to what extent was driven by overall lower discounting or lower -- or any other material changes in raw materials?

Kathryn, this is Sarah. In regards to the sequential comparison, notably what's been a positive impact in our fourth fiscal quarter is -- same-store overhead absorption is significant. We produced a similar level, incrementally more that we sold. And in addition, we have a dynamic where we are selling primarily model year 2013 pricing, or priced products, not the prior year's model year product. And so there's an element there that that's improved margins somewhat across the board. And from an inflationary standpoint, when we compare where we've been tracking, and we really evaluate that monthly but reset standards twice a year, that was actually kind of was a huge contributing factor to our LIFO adjustment because we were seeing deflation. And when we compare our parts and pieces cost from August of '11 to August of '12 and when we compare where we were in the second and third quarters and where we are in the fourth quarter, notably it's not just in our materials, it's in our labor as well because we have hired so notably inside our fourth quarter, just slightly under 200 people. That's also introducing a lower average hourly wage, and that's also been a help in regards to our cost structure.

And also, obviously, this is the second big quarter of outsized backlogs. Clarify better, are you seeing channel fill or is this driven by retail? We actually do our own survey work and are seeing definite improvement, but this is definitely seems to be above and beyond a feedback from retail demand.

Well, I will quickly comment. Then maybe Randy would like to add to that. From -- we definitely don't see enough inventory yet at our dealer level, at our dealerships. Our dealer inventory went down in the quarter, and it's down year-over-year. We have in the low 1,900 units on hand at the end of August. Our retail, notably inside the fourth quarter, retail registrations of Winnebago products increased almost 11.5%. So it was definitely a pop for us inside the fiscal fourth quarter, and a part of that I think is the excitement that Randy touched upon with some of the new product introductions that we've had. However, a lot of that wouldn't have had that opportunity to our retail throughout the entire quarter, as we started shipping some of that product in June. But we think our dealer inventories could definitely -- it would be helpful for that to move up quite a bit in light -- and then that's also reflected by our demand just continuing to build. I think our dealers are interested in having more on their lots.

Kathryn, I've been to a few shows and several dealer visits throughout the fall and late summer. And there's a lot of excitement building around our products. We're hitting price points in market segments very successfully that just we haven't hit in a while. And as I've said all along, our goal is to outperform the market, and that remains our goal.

Okay. And then finally, what exactly are the Towable production issues? I mean, is this -- maybe a little bit more clarification on that.

We have accomplished some things very well. We've got a lot of appealing product out there. We're generating the revenues, as you can tell, which is very important to get the cash flowing through the business. We need to go back and clean up some of the supporting activities around that, notably bills and materials better capturing the cost of the goods sold. I think that's fair to say where our biggest challenges are. And it's all mechanical. It's doable. Our challenge now is to go back and fix some of those things that we didn't do a very good job of to date.

Your next question comes from the line of Greg Badishkanian with Citi.

This is actually Alvin Concepcion in for Greg. We've seen some pretty strong retail sales growth lately and wondering if you've seen a change in retail demand since then. Historically, in election years, we see consumers hold off on purchases until there's some certainty. Are you seeing that at all, or would you expect to see that?

I think it's fair to say that it remains quite robust.

That's great to hear. And also I was wondering about the commentary on the retail credit environment over the past couple of months. Have you seen changes there?

I think there's access for those that are creditworthy. I don't think that there has been any change. It's still a dynamic of that someone is willing to borrow to purchase a discretionary item such as this. But I don't think there's any availability issues in the marketplace.

That's great. And then with regards to the competitive landscape, are you seeing any changes in the promotional or discounting environment? Has it gotten better since the end of the quarter, given the strong demand?

It was really pretty reasonable at the end of the quarter, actually. And I don't think it's changed much.

Your next question comes from line of Mark Altschwager of Robert Baird.

A couple of questions. Starting with the buyback, Randy or Sarah, could you just discuss your philosophy behind the capital allocation? And is the buyback sensitive to a valuation model? Is it all the 10b5-1, or how are you thinking about that?

Well, I'll begin with the general perspective of why that's the avenue that we took, and Sarah could probably explain some of the details of the tools that we're using more appropriately. We've discussed this early in the fourth quarter as to -- we achieved a point where we thought that was appropriate to start to utilize our cash in a way that went back into the stock. And naturally, the 2 most popular methods for that are through dividends or buyback. And we debated that, and we had a lot of discussion with the Board, and we had discussions with some of our investment-banker relationships. And we just arrived that given the situation of where our business is that, where the stock is at, what we see going forward, we think this is the best method right now for accomplishing that. And it gives us a great degree of flexibility. Going forward, we still have, and we've stated this on many occasions, that we have this open share repurchase authorization. And even to date, we have $49 million left on that authorization. So it gives us a lot of flexibility, and I think that's what was most appealing to us.

From the standpoint of your question as to how we're executing as we move forward on that, in the summer, before our self-imposed blackout time frame began, we were doing open market purchasing. But we're following a formula, using a grid to concentrate, that's the logic. And it's definitely based upon what we project the future to hold. And then once the blackout period commenced, that -- a grid was provided and that will end tomorrow. And on a perspective basis, it's not at that point where we have to evaluate and refresh our calculations, and you'll see where we want to go prospectively.

And jumping to the backlog, just following up there. Couple of quarters of very strong backlog. If a dealer places an order today, how long does it take for that dealer to receive the product? And then maybe talk about how that lead time compares to a year ago or a couple of years ago.

Well, first off, it would depend on what product he orders, naturally. Some products take longer just to get through our system than others, simply because there's more labor involved and more processes involved. So in -- a year ago, where the backlog wasn't much present, we have production offsets if it was a special ordered unit. Our production offsets, say, from the time we receive the order to the time we physically build the product, is about 4 weeks. And then, of course, there's finishing and shipping involved in that. And that would be the simplest of products. Products that require more value-added content would take longer than that. Naturally, our order position and our ability to respond to increases in production rates change that and lengthen that. So it varies dramatically. Right now, if it's a series that's not as popular as another, we could still be close to that timeframe for delivery. But if it's a product that has higher labor content and has a stronger order backlog, naturally, that could get pushed out to many weeks beyond that. And then also keep in mind that some of these order positions aren't necessarily for immediate delivery. We may have some dealers placing orders for winter delivery. So it's not like everything in the order bank is necessarily for immediate delivery either. But I don't want to get into a lot of specifics of exactly where that puts us, but it does stretch things out, as you would anticipate.

Jumping around here, I see you recently hired a new VP of Sales and Product Management in the Towable division.

Yes.

How does that addition influence the strategy, if at all?

What we're trying to do by accomplishing that is to address exactly what I spoke about to Kathryn. We needed to go back and do some tightening up of builds and materials and those types of things. And we think this person is going to bring that discipline to the table, and that's a big part of it.

And one last one, Sarah, just housekeeping on the tax rate. It's been quite volatile the last few quarters. Just for modeling purposes, what's a good tax rate to use going forward?

For now, with our deferred tax assets reestablished, ideally that will eliminate a lot of complications on a prospective basis. So we would think a reasonable range of rates to be using going forward to be in the low 30s.

Your next question comes from the line of Morris Ajzenman with Griffin Securities.

Question -- first question on cash flow. Clearly, this year, with the buildup in inventories, it was good a reason that you had the buildup because of demand, but it caused a drag on cash flow even before CapEx -- I mean, excuse me, before share repurchase. How does that play into next year? Again, demand's still pretty strong, things are building. Are inventories, I think you said it was a work in process that kind of drove it up. How does that play for next year, inventories, without tipping a hand as far as looking at revenues and earnings? But how does that play out, do you become much more cash flow positive or are inventories of working capital still going to consume a lot of the capital, et cetera, et cetera?

Yes, inventories definitely have been an area in this past fiscal year where on a cost -- on an annualized basis, we've grown FIFO inventories over $17 million. So if we continue to see demand move dramatically, that could drive inventory levels up to some degree. On an annualized basis, another element that is depending on what additional progress we make are on the stock repurchase front. And that was a use of cash inside the fourth quarter. And as I mentioned, it's continued to be a use of cash here outside of the operational activity cash flow. But when I look ahead to the next fiscal year, I think inventories -- it's going to be dependent upon demand. So, and to your point, without trying to go into any kind of guidance on the top line, I mean, there's differently going to be cash generated from operations. Our goal would be from a cash provided -- to be in a cash provided by operating activity net position at the end of the fiscal year.

All right. Just switching gears, unrelated to that question, can you give us a feel, Class A diesel particularly, what sort of price increases you experienced in the quarter, and how that plays out going forward?

Do you mean pricing to our customer or the pricing of the components we use to build that product?

The pricing to your customer.

It's -- in the transition from our model year to the model year 2013, which was primarily what we delivered inside the fourth quarter, there's always a dynamic of a price increase. But it's going to be a function of what did we change to the product if at all and what kind of other features or option changes that did occur. And on a unit-by-unit basis that was not material. We're talking in low single-digit percentage ranges in our diesel category. But we do have a very wide range of diesel price points. And so our average diesel ASP, for example, can move quite significantly inside any particular quarter depending on which products we do deliver, because we have a price point that's for our base diesel product that's in -- around $100,000 all the way up to a 42-foot tag-axle, that's $250,000. So that thing of what is ordered and delivered can really influence it. But on an individual products basis, there weren't material increases to the pricing to our dealers.

I would now like to turn the presentation over to Mr. Randy Potts for closing remarks.

Thank you. We believe we are seeing positive signs in the marketplace: dealer inventory continues to be conservatively low, inventory on the dealer's lots is fresh new product, and the RV market continues to recover. I'd like to thank everyone for joining our conference call today. I look forward to talking to you again on December 20, when we report our results for the first quarter of fiscal 2013.

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect. Have a great day.