Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the GeneDx Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Sabrina Dunbar, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and thank you to everyone for joining us today. On the call, we have Katherine Stueland, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Kevin Feeley, Chief Financial Officer. Earlier today, GeneDx released financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2025. Before we begin, please take note of our cautionary statement. We may make forward-looking statements on today's call, including about our business plans, updated 2025 guidance and outlook. Forward-looking statements inherently involve risks and uncertainties and only reflect our view as of today, July 29, and we are under no obligation to update. When discussing our results, we refer to non-GAAP measures, which exclude certain items from reported results. Please refer to our second quarter 2025 earnings release and slides available at ir.genedx.com for definitions and reconciliations of non-GAAP measures and additional information regarding our results, including a discussion of factors that could cause actual results to materially differ from forward-looking statements. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Katherine.

Thanks, Sabrina, and good morning, everyone. Today, I'm incredibly proud to share that our team's work not only met but exceeded expectations, achieving a major milestone of delivering over $100 million in revenue in a single quarter for the first time. Our strong second quarter performance was driven by our core business, underscoring its strength and resilience. These results, coupled with the ever-expanding opportunities ahead, demonstrate that we're just beginning to deliver on the promise of how our genomic technology can fundamentally transform health care. Our vision is for a world where genetic information is delivered as early as possible to prevent unnecessary suffering and lead to healthier lives for all. Today, we're waiting for symptoms to develop and for disease to progress, not only over the course of months, but over the course of years. We've never been more resolute about our commitment to radically change this. Shifting from sick care to health care, driving better health outcomes, better economic value and a better health care system for us all. At a recent all-company meeting, a patient advocate reminded us why we do this. His diagnostic odyssey lasted nearly 2 decades before he received answers. History highlights a systemic issue. Care often starts too late, with children waiting an average of 5 years for a genetic diagnosis. This is totally unacceptable given the solutions we have in hand today at GeneDx. Thanks to our investment in innovation and scale, genomic testing, once considered slow and costly, now delivers answers not in weeks or even days, but sometimes hours and at costs lower than ever before. Our technology is shifting health care from reactive to proactive, benefiting both patients and the health care system. GeneDx is uniquely positioned to bring genomic information into mainstream medicine. We diagnose more rare diseases…

Thanks, Katherine, and thank you all for joining us today. We reported second quarter 2025 revenues of $102.7 million, a 49% increase year-over-year. That total includes a record high of $85.9 million in revenue from exome and genome, up 69% from the same quarter last year. The average reimbursement rate for exome and genome was over $3,700 a test in the quarter. That's up from approximately $3,400 last quarter, and there's nothing I would call out in the second quarter results as unique or onetime. We're driving sustainable reimbursement rate improvements across both commercial and Medicaid payers by demonstrating the value necessary to expand policies. Our use of technology and process design are helping to avoid unnecessary nonmedical documentation and procedural denials. As I've often said, revenue cycle improvements aren't always linear. Some periods outperform others. Q2 was one of those standout quarters though, reinforcing our durable long-term improvement trend. As we sit here today, business fundamentals have never been stronger, and our serviceable market continues to expand. We remain on track to deliver our full year guide of at least 30% year-over-year volume growth. We reported 23,102 exome and genome tests in the second quarter of 2025, up 28% compared to the second quarter of last year. The first half of the year has continued to play out as anticipated, providing conviction in the back half and with several catalysts to come. This quarter, the majority of growth came from existing docs, and we are seeing strong early signals that new indications like cerebral palsy are driving increased same-store sale. And importantly, our expansion into new indications makes GeneDx even more attractive to new account targets. In the back half of this year and beyond, we'll begin to layer on new growth curves from the NICU and from pediatric…

Thank you, Kevin, and thank you to our entire team for their continued dedication to the patients and families we serve. We believe the future of health care is about proactive personalized care. That means understanding as early as possible whether a person has a genetic condition so that care can be tailored, risks can be managed and outcomes improved. This is the future of medicine. This is the genome era, and we're proud to be leading the way. With that, we welcome your questions.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question for the day will be coming from David Westenberg of Piper Sandler.

Congrats on such a great quarter. My first one here is for Kevin. ASPs [ trounced ] estimates by a lot. You kind of mentioned there's no onetime thing in the quarter, but it was a pretty big move. So can you maybe go back a couple of quarters, assuming this is ebbs and flows, are there a couple of discrete drivers to think about over the last 4 quarters, maybe like a few states that went that all covered all at the same time? Or anything to think about your benefits that may be manifested this quarter that we could think about maybe comping or any other thing in kind of the go-forward basis?

Yes. Thanks, Dave. I'd say if you were to roll back the clock, you go back towards the end of 2023, we made major overhauls to the team and processes across the revenue cycle to identify ways to more closely adhere to documentation requirements on a payer- by-payer basis, and that's paid off handsomely. And so as it relates to reducing denials across commercial payers, it's more so our continued ability to improve payment rates by reducing what I'll call unnecessary documentation or procedural denials. That work has been ongoing for a year, and we continue to invest in finding ways to adhere to necessary requirements to get paid fairly for the work that we perform. And of course, on the Medicaid population, a large portion of our business does run through Medicaid, state Medicaid programs, and there's been a steady flow of new states picking up Medicaid coverage over the last year to 2 years. We're now up to 35 states that cover exome and genome on an outpatient basis, which includes just 2 new ones this quarter that picked up coverage and 17 that cover rapid genome on the inpatient side. So there's no doubt that we're benefiting from more and more state Medicaid coverage. That's, of course, volume that we've been serving well ahead of coverage. So it was always there in terms of volume but not necessarily paid volume, and happy to see that pulling through. My comment on the second quarter is more so to say there's nothing I would call out that's leading to that higher rate in the second quarter as anything outside of us just continuing to collect better by reducing denials. So no major appeal wins to call out, just the good hard work to ensure that we're boosting collection rate by avoiding unnecessary denial.

Got it. And this is probably more for Katherine. As you're thinking about going after the pediatric market in 2026, can you talk about balancing an economically sound approach with going after this really big opportunity and how we should think about kind of the ramp in investment there? Maybe that's a little bit of Kevin, too. But anyway.

Yes, that's great. So the general pediatric opportunity is, of course, a massive one, and it's one that we have to build. And so I think your question about how do we balance particularly -- the core of our business and growth in ped neuro, where we've been continuing to see great success versus building a market is really important. The runway on the ped neuro side of things continues to be a really critical opportunity for us. So we're going to continue to put the vast majority of our focus, of course, there for the remainder of this year and into 2026 and '27 as well as we start to build this broader general pediatrician market. The first step for us beyond the guidelines being published really comes down to a number of things. So one, our sales team will continue to focus on ped neuros, but we've got a very targeted approach to the pediatricians who are ordering testing from us today. So we feel like we've got the right balance, keeping our eye on the ball for the near-term opportunity. I would say, second, will be at AAP, which is in September, we'll start to educate the general pediatricians at that meeting through local chapters and through medical education. Our market access team is bringing the guidelines to all of the payers to ensure that the medical policy really gets updated to be in line with AAP guidelines. And then we'll continue to extend our marketing investment that we kicked off in June of this year to raise awareness. So we think that we're taking a really prudent approach to the investment in the current market expansion in ped neuros and other specialists while we take on the future market on general pediatricians. I'd say the other piece that we have an eye on is how do we continue to make it easier for a nonexpert to order our testing. So we've begun to invest earlier this year, in fact, already embedded in our plans for 2025 in simplifying the ordering experience, making it easier for a nonexpert to understand the results and the clinical action plans, the next step. So our product and technology team has, I would say, a really important road map that we need to realize to fully be able to take over that general pediatrician opportunity.

Congrats again.

And our next question will be coming from the line of Dan Brennan of TD Cowen.

Congrats, obviously, on a really strong quarter. Maybe could you speak a little to -- and Katherine and Kevin, you both touched on it during the prepared remarks. But just as you think about volumes, which were good in the quarter, you talked about the bridge to the second half. Just give us a little color on how the NICU is going, kind of what's -- how do we think about the impact in the back half of the year from the EMR integrations as well from some of these newer indications? Just wondering how the early progress has been and kind of what we assume to kind of bridge to the 30% volume growth.

Awesome. So starting with the outpatient opportunity. As we said, most of the volume that we saw in the second quarter came from our core, meaning pediatric neurologists who had been ordering from us. About 25% of the volume growth came from new clinicians. And so I think what we saw in Q2 was continued great growth in terms of the existing indications starting to be amplified by new indications as well. We kicked off cerebral palsy in March. We started calling on pediatric immunologists in April. So we expect that those are going to continue to really pick up. We saw some early indications that amplified Q2, but we think Q3 and Q4 are going to be when we start to see the additional benefit from new indications. So as we think about the contours of Q3 and Q4, we think volume growth will be bolstered by new indications in the second half of the year. On the NICU side of things, that's such an important new market for us. And we're really pleased with all of the progress that we've made. We have 3 health systems that are live with Epic, and we're seeing volumes come through those 3 health systems. And we'll have 12, at least 12 in the second half of the year. So the sales team will really be focused, and this is the enterprise sales team, so it's different from the outpatient team. They're focused now on pulling those volumes through once Epic sites are coming online. So we'll see some contribution in Q3, but I think the real boost will be in Q4 in terms of the few thousand tests for the full year.

Great. And maybe if you can hear me -- hopefully, you can hear me okay. Just on price. So Kevin, obviously, a really strong price quarter. Would you be -- could you give us a sense of what the prior period collection was in the quarter? So we can kind of do our math. It looks like you're kind of guiding for the back half of the year somewhere between, call it, [ 3,450 ], like low [ 3,600s ] in order to get to your exome/genome revenue growth. Obviously, it's a bit of a step down but still super solid. Just wondering if you can help us think through what's baked in, in kind of the prior period impact this quarter.

Yes. So what's -- if you look at pricing for the remainder of the year, you take the [ 3,718 ] we just posted in the second quarter. I think that's a good number, Dan. And the reason I didn't call out anything kind of unique or one-off is that number, I think, is reflective of our cash collection experience in the second quarter and today and should be relied upon. Now from a guide perspective, the guide does absorb the ability as we enter into new indications or new call points to see a higher denial rate on the new stuff, if you will. And therefore, if you do the math on the guide anchored in achieving the 30% for the full year, which we remain convicted in, it does -- the guide allows for that rate to step down some in the back half of the year. We have no particular reason to believe that, that rate would step down other than the inherent nature of submitting things for the first time to payers on the new indications and new call points. The level of out-of-period adjustments have been fairly consistent over the past 2 years. The numbers disclosed in the quarter, it ranges anywhere from like $3 million to $6 million. But I think important to properly characterize the Q2 performance as really representative of the collection rate and frankly, a function of the fact that we continue to reduce denials and improve collection.

And if I can just sneak one more in. Katherine, you said in the prepared remarks, I think you said less than 5% of pediatricians already order for GP and IDD. So kind of if you do the quick math, that's like over 2,000 pediatricians that's sort of maybe your target early. Do you think you can begin to see some volume impact this year from those pediatricians? Just trying to solve for like what that early opportunity might look like.

Yes. So we are going to be talking to pediatricians who are ordering from us today, but we don't want to distract our team from ensuring that they are really focused on the ped neuro and other specialists that are embedded into our plan. I would say contribution to this year from general pediatricians is going to be very minimal. And I think we'll start to see some more volumes in 2026 without a doubt. But I would say, minimal for this year because we do want to make sure that the team continues to focus on the important growth opportunity that we have from the core.

And our next question is coming from the line of Subbu Nambi of Guggenheim.

Amazing quarter. A follow-up to Dave's question, you are targeting 60,000 or so pediatricians. First, how do you go about identifying pediatricians who have ordered genetic test at some point? I know you're going to use a targeted commercial approach where you're going to learn before scaling up. What are the signs you're looking for? What would make you expand quicker or slower?

Wonderful. So just to zoom out, so the general pediatrician opportunity, really, if you think about it, there's 60,000 pediatricians in the U.S. About 25,000 of them see about 600,000 patients who have DD/ID. So as we think about that target group of pediatricians that we'll first focus on as we start to enter the gen peds market, it would be the 25,000 who today are diagnosing patients with DD/ID. Of course, we want to see a day where all pediatricians are ordering the testing, but we think that from a segmentation standpoint, that 25,000 is the right area for us to focus on. And so as we think about the sales force and planning to expand it as we enter into 2026, the 25,000 will be the area that we really stay focused on in the beginning.

Got it. This is -- this one is for Kevin. The other panels were pretty strong compared to our estimate. What drove that strength? I thought you were deprioritizing targeted panels. And then along those lines, how should we think about it in Q3 and Q4?

Yes. So you're thinking about it correctly. The sales team is not out there targeting and not incentivized, frankly, for the past 2 years to bring in anything other than exome and genome. That said, as we activate new accounts, there are some non-exome, non-genome orders that come along for the ride with new doctors, which then tells us there's an opportunity to educate physicians around the clinical benefits for exome and genome to continue our efforts to really move the industry away from individual gene tests and multi- gene panels on to exome and genome. So the growth there, I would say, is nothing more than some success on activating new accounts and gives us an opportunity to further educate those physicians now that they're active [ orderers ] of GeneDx. The back half of the year, we tend to expect since we're not incentivizing the commercial team to grow the other panel lines, so tend to expect flat or some slight attrition in that other panel line with pickup in exome and genome. While at the same time, I'd say, as we move further down the road to pediatricians, we'll have to learn some of the initial experience to see if we see an increase in CMA, chromosomal microarray orders as we first start to approach pediatricians, but none of that expected to impact volumes in the second half of the year in a meaningful way.

And Kevin, just to be clear, you're doing all of this passively, not incentivizing, but you're taking in orders when it comes?

Correct.

Got it. And last one for me, guys. During the last quarter, you mentioned that there is a waiting room of clients for Epic Aura. And did you make meaningful steps to onboard all those clients? And is there still backlog, so to speak, of systems leading to integrate?

Yes. We absolutely have made progress. So as I said, we have 3 that are live, and we're continuing to bring more Epic Aura sites on, and we continue to build the pipeline there. So we're really pleased with how that business is continuing to shape up. And as I said, we're contemplating that the fourth quarter, we'll see the impact of those Epic Aura implementations in a more meaningful way than in Q3, but we're pleased to see volumes coming through when we're bringing on Epic Aura sites.

And our next question will be coming from the line of William Bonello of Craig-Hallum.

A couple of things. Kevin, I know you don't give quarterly guidance, but given the commentary about a lot of the impact, at least on the NICU side really being more Q4 than Q3 and the hopes to avoid a repeat of Q1, can you give us any kind of sense of how you think volume growth might shake out between the third and the fourth quarter?

Yes. Bill, look, the guide is anchored on our conviction today to deliver that 30% or more volume growth for the full year. So if you take last year's test count at 30% or more, that gets you to about 96,900 tests. If you were to back out what we just resulted in the first half of the year, that leaves roughly 53,200 in the back half of the year. There is a seasonal dynamic that I'll remind everybody about with Q4 invariably being the strongest of any quarter throughout the year. Q1, the lightest of any quarter during the year, and Q3 does have some summer calendar effects to it. But we sit here today reaffirming that 30% full year year-over-year guide because of our conviction in it. So you might expect the second half of tests to kind of fall out with about 54% of that back half number in the fourth quarter.

Okay, that's really helpful. And then just on that number, and I know you addressed this a little bit in response to Dan's question. But I mean, it still is a really big ramp that's implied in the back half of the year. And I guess if it's based on Katherine's comments about maybe a few thousand NICU tests, that doesn't really quite get you there. So maybe just give us a little reason -- a little bit more color on your level of confidence and why you feel so confident that either the new indications are really going to be kicking in or you're seeing an acceleration in the growth from the pediatric neurologists or allow us to believe that, that ramp is going to happen.

Yes, the majority of the second half ramp coming from outpatients, although that's not to understate the long-term importance of the NICU or our confidence to win that market. But if you look at the second half of the year, some of that confidence comes in the acceleration of growth we've now had in the second quarter, right? First quarter was 24% year-over-year, second quarter, 28%. In order to get to the full year guide of 30% or more, the 30% mark would infer about 33% in the second half of the year and has available to it a lot of levers that the first half didn't, which includes some more time for new indications like cerebral palsy and others that we'll be launching into -- to mature in terms of ramp from existing docs and new account activation. The first half didn't have available to it any impact from pediatric immunologists, that will begin to see an inflection in the second half of the year. And we continue to see a growing increase in same-store sales, as I called out. So a nice signal we saw in the second quarter was some of the talking points around new indications and a broader focus on education for physicians, we think, is making us more attractive to new accounts, but also just giving us a great reason to get back into the doctor's office to reeducate them on the benefits of exome and genome first. And with a broader set of indications to talk about, we're seeing signs that that's going to help increase same-store sales.

And our next question will be coming from the line of Mark Massaro of BTIG.

Congratulations for a very nice quarter. I know in Q4 of '24, I believe your payment or denial rates were somewhere in the 50% range. And then I think in Q1, I believe you made some improvements, your denial rate, I think, was somewhere around the high 40s or so. Kevin, you talked about improvements in revenue cycle management. So I would just be curious where you're at today with the denial rate or the pay rate percentage.

Yes. The paid rates now -- and you're tracking correctly, Mark. So thanks. The paid rate is now mid-50s. So a nice step-up of a couple of hundred basis points this quarter over last. And I think we remain convicted that there's still a lot of room to run -- to reduce denials over time. Like I said, the guide assumes that on the portion of volume coming from new indications or new call points, there's just an inherent nature. And therefore, we've left some conservative room in the guide. But as we sit here today, the team is more well- armed to have that back-and-forth boxing match with payers than we've ever been. So yes -- but I think you're tracking correctly and appreciate it.

Awesome. I know -- I think you guys have touched on this, but there were some inbounds this morning about the rationale to increase the exome and genome revenue guide, but to hold the exome/genome volume guide. I'm pretty sure it has a lot to do with the success with the higher ASPs on exome/genome. But can you maybe just fill that rationale out a little bit further just for folks?

Yes. I think it reflects our best estimate of how the year is going to play out. Obviously, we're very pleased with the performance in reimbursement rates. We think those rates are durable, and we'll expect to see them rise. And so felt it's important to reflect our confidence in the overall reimbursement dynamic to raise the revenue number, while at the same time, our outlook for the year has been and remains today even more confident in that 30% or higher volume mark, which is why we reaffirmed that.

Awesome. And if I can sneak one more in. I'd be curious if you guys could expand a little bit more about how the Fabric Genomics is tracking relative to your expectations. I know that there were some customers that Fabric had that you guys may not have had. So I'd just be curious how that's going? And to what extent can that expand some of your opportunities?

Yes. Fabric, we're really happy that we acquired it. So just out of the gate, it's a fantastic team. Our team has begun really mapping out what integration looks like from porting our data into Fabric in order to ensure that we can really drive better diagnoses in a decentralized way, putting our data to work for more patients as well as how do we think about the best of Fabric, the best of GeneDx and our ability to really put the strongest AI features into our interpretation capability. So we're excited about it. They're on track with our plan this year in terms of their revenues, their gross margins. The teams have had a fantastic time collaborating and really starting to work together. So we're excited about it. And again, as we think about the potential for where Fabric can really help us drive the business, we've begun hiring sales reps for the international opportunity. So we're excited about the potential to start driving utilization of Fabric via GeneDx in international markets. It's also a really important asset as we think about how to solve newborn screening and ensure that patients have standardized results, whether a baby is born in London or in Los Angeles. So we're really excited about the future potential within the capabilities of GeneDx. So it's off to a great start.

And the next question will be coming from the line of Brandon Couillard of Wells Fargo.

Kevin, do you think the second quarter volume growth benefited from any catch-up benefit from the -- after the weather-related disruptions you encountered in the first quarter at all?

Yes. I think in the first quarter, we said weather might have impacted Q1 1 to 2 days, let's call that 400 or 500 tests. And we also said at that time, missed appointments due to weather events in our space are not typically lost, but just deferred and sometimes deferred for weeks or even months. And we saw that play out as expected. So yes, equal to the 1 or 2 days we called out as weather in Q1 and carried over to Q2, and then we saw a nice good growth on top of that.

Okay. And then how much of the sequential OpEx growth came from the Fabric deal as opposed to kind of organic investments? And how are you thinking about OpEx in the second half?

Fabric was about $1 million of OpEx in the quarter. That's a partial quarter where we've owned the asset for 2 months in the second quarter. Look, as I said in my prepared remarks, certainly where we see opportunities to invest, to seize a leadership position in all these new markets, we will make those investments. I think at the same time, we want to signal that we think we have ample room for the business to drive leverage such that we can make some substantial investments to dominate these markets while still driving a profitable business. We think that's important to do in the long run for shareholders, and we thought important to call that out.

Great. Last one, Katherine. The data business picked up a little bit in terms of revenue. Anything to watch out for on the pharma partnership front? Any milestones to look forward to later this year?

Certainly. So I think that business is healthy, and we're really happy to see same-store sales there, both in terms of patient matching and in terms of people interested in GeneDx Discover, which is our data visualization product. So we're bringing on new customers. We're continuing to sign more contracts within existing customers, and I expect we'll continue to print and repeat that throughout the course of this year. We remain really optimistic about the future ability for us to put data to work in a much more meaningful way. And we're starting to turn our attention to what that can look like in the future in terms of much broader collaborations with pharma companies. But today, we're happy with the way that, that business continues to perform, and we remain really optimistic about the potential for it in the future.

And our next question will be coming from the line of Tycho Peterson of Jefferies.

I appreciate all the color you guys have given on the AAP guidelines. Just one question we've gotten is just on the reliance on geneticists' readiness to interpret reports, pediatricians are spread thin, workload, et cetera. Maybe just talk a little bit about the role you think they might play and to what degree that could be a rate-limiting factor for adoption.

Yes. That is a fantastic question, Tycho. So a couple of things. Pediatricians, their time is indeed tight. I think they have on average about 12 minutes per patient. We need to really make it easier for one of those clinicians to have access to testing. So when we talk about our customer experience, making it a best-in-class customer experience, it includes simplifying the entire ordering process on the front end as well as on the back end, how do we simplify the report to make it easier for them to understand so they're not reliant on a genetic counselor or a genetic expert. So what -- how do we simplify the report? How do we make the care plans really easy to understand as well? So part of our customer experience that our product team is building out really, I would say, streamlines and simplifies that entire experience. So they're not needing to be beholden to a genetic counselor or another genetics expert. And part of that includes taking the knowledge base of genetic counselors and ensuring that whether it is through chat capabilities or otherwise throughout that entire customer experience that we can really scale the knowledge base that is currently existing within only about 2,000 genetic counselors that are out there. So we think that customer experience, talent and opportunity is real, and we're really excited about building that out. Importantly is also how do we take some of the workload off of the pediatrician and empower parents? So how much of the parent portal can we build to make it easier and even more informed by a parent who's super motivated to make sure that their child gets an answer. So there's really kind of this nice push and pull between how we simplify the ordering and report and customer service experience for the pediatrician, but also how do we engage with parents in a really smart way to offload some of the work from the pediatrician as well. So that is really an important part of what our team has started building, and we expect that we'll start to see some of those features in 2026 that we think will help unlock the market.

Okay. That's helpful. And then maybe just following up on the pediatric market. Just commercial payers, how do you think about the time line to really get them on board? What's needed to operationalize? Obviously, guidelines put a lot of pressure on them to come on board. But what -- how do you think about the time lines?

Yes, you're right. Guidelines do put a lot of pressure. They don't guarantee, but it certainly is an important tool that we will use to make the case to payers. Look, as we outlined, that 18 to 24 months from the time point between guidelines and inflection in terms of pull-through is to build the product features Katherine just talked about. It's to educate physicians, get them aware of the benefits and the guidelines, frankly. There's a lot of buy-side analysts who probably follow AAP guidelines more closely than pediatricians. So there is education for us to do, while at the same time, that gives us the lead time to build the dossier to approach payers to ensure they're up-to-date with the latest literature, with the latest clinical and economic data to show that the use of these tests frontline not only alleviate suffering, gives better insights to physicians, but can help avoid unnecessary cost for the health system and for insurers. And so rest assured, we'll be making that case in earnest and are already getting started on that.

Okay. Last one. As you kind of lap some of the biomarker bills that got added over the last 12 months, what should we be watching on kind of the state front for the back half of the year? And then on Medicaid, have you sized the potential headwinds from the Big Beautiful Bill cuts that were laid out?

So we were pleased to see additional states come on this past quarter. And -- so we're now up to 35 in outpatient, 17 in the inpatient and our -- we've expanded our government affairs team on the state side of things. So we're full court press in terms of continuing to drive the statewide. On H.R. 1, I think the reality is not a material impact directly on our business. But of course, any changes in Medicaid impacts every hospital system. I think what is beneficial for us is the health economic data that we have generated and that our field continues to generate that ensures that we're actually making the health care system in every dollar that is allocated towards it go further. We're making the health care system more efficient. Going back to that pediatrician opportunity and the NICU opportunity, the 5 years on average that a child is undiagnosed is costing the health care system a lot of money today. And getting an answer as early as possible is going to save the health care system dollars. So the health economic data that we are putting in front of Medicaid, in front of payers, in front of health systems, in front of policymakers is part of what is making the GeneDx opportunity, one that is beneficial both from a clinical care perspective, but also in terms of the overall health care spend in this country. So we think that there's only strength ahead in terms of our ability to both impact and effect change for the better for these kids, get an earlier diagnosis and save everyone money along the way.

In terms of [indiscernible] states, Tycho, as Katherine said, look, we picked up 2 new states with outpatient coverage despite some of the headline noise out there. I think, a strong signal. Go back a year, there were 28 states, and we're now to 35 covering the test, outpatient. So significant progress. In terms of what that number will be a year from now, it's hard to tell. A lot of factors outside of our control. From a guide perspective, we don't count on any new states picking up coverage, and we take those as they come. But certainly, the momentum is there.

Thank you. And that does conclude today's Q&A session. I would like to go ahead and turn the call back over to Katherine Stueland for closing remarks. Please go ahead.

Thank you all for your questions and for joining our call today. As we look ahead, we remain focused on execution, innovation and expanding access to genomic insights that can truly transform care. Thank you for your continued support and belief in our vision. We look forward to updating you on our continued momentum next quarter.

This does conclude today's conference call. You may all disconnect.