Good morning. My name is Christine and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the WhiteHorse Finance Second Quarter 2015 Earnings Teleconference. Our hosts for today’s call are Jay Carvell, Executive Officer and Gerhard Lombard, Chief Financial Officer. Today’s call is being recorded and will be available for replay beginning at 1 pm Eastern. The replay dial-in number is (404) 537-3406 and the pin number is 84043776. At this time, all participants have been placed in a listen-only mode and the floor will be open for your questions following the presentation. [Operator Instructions] It is now my pleasure to hand the floor over to Brian Schaffer of Prosek Partners. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Christine, and thank you everyone for joining us today to discuss WhiteHorse Finance’s second quarter 2015 earnings results. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that certain statements made during this call, which are not based on historical facts including any statements relating to financial guidance, may be deemed forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Because these forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, these are important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. WhiteHorse Finance assumes no obligation or responsibility to update any forward-looking statements. With that, allow me to introduce WhiteHorse Finance’s CEO, Jay Carvell. Jay, you may begin.

Thanks, Brian. Good morning. Thank you for joining us today. As you know, our press release was issued this morning before market opened and I hope you have had a chance to review our results. Starting with a brief overview. We are again pleased to report a strong quarter overall and solid first half results to start 2015 following on the success we had in 2014. Our performance across key metrics such as NII, portfolio yield and NAV lay out the story and strategy we disused with you all since our launch in 2012. We believe this provides a foundation for continued growth and success while also benefiting our shareholder in the long run. I’ll go through some of the high points and our strategy going forward before having Gerhard walk you through our financial results and the capital position. There are two main themes I want to highlight on today’s call, the first being another solid quarter in terms of NII which is up 47.4% year-over-year and 10.4% on a sequential basis. The second theme which we’ve discussed on prior calls is the ongoing optimization of our portfolio which has helped us drive NII. This effort is predominantly focused on cycling out of lower yielding loans and replacing them with attractive risk-adjusted loans that have yields that are more accretive to the broader portfolio. We do this while also looking to balance our portfolio in terms of investment size and industry focus. During the second quarter, we replaced $20 million in five portfolio investments that carried an average effective yield of around 9%. At the same time, we had gross adds to the portfolio of over $30 million in two investments at a combined effective yield of over 11.8% which leaves us at an effective yield of 11.7% through…

Thanks Jay. Let’s begin with our results for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. Net investment income of $5.9 million compared with $5.3 million reported in the first quarter of 2015 and $4 million reported in the second quarter of 2014. This increase in NII is a result of our continued focus on optimization, both in terms of portfolio yield and capital structure. This resulted in NII per share of $0.393 for Q2 2015. As you are aware, our quarterly dividend has been consistent at $0.355 per share. Our investment income continues to consist primarily of recurring cash interest. Second quarter fee income was approximately $700,000 compared with first quarter fee income of about $100,000; average fee income however was $400,000 per quarter during 2014 and 2015 on a year to date basis. So, while current fee income was slightly higher than usual, it was in line with the trend and also with our expectations. Net realized and unrealized losses on investments were $137,000 during the second quarter of 2015 compared with 561,000 reported during the first quarter of 2015. As a result, we reported an increase in net assets from operations $5.7 million or $0.38 per share for the second quarter compared with an increase of $4.8 million or $0.32 per share for the first quarter of 2015. Expenses for the quarter totaled $6.3 million, a slight increase from $6.0 million of expenses reported during the first quarter. Second quarter 2015 expenses consisted of $1.7 million of interest expense on our credit facilities and base management fees and performance-based incentive fees of $3.6 million. When looking at expenses on a year-over-year basis, the increase in interest expense on our credit facilities was due to primarily to a higher outstanding balance on our revolving credit facility and the year-over-year increase…

The floor is now open for questions. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. Your first question is coming from Troy Ward with KBW.

Jay, could you provide just a little more color on the H.I.G. affiliated funds, purchasing the 40 million of stock? Is there any additional information you can give us on that? Is this done through a structured program? Are there any restrictions? Just kind of give us kind of how structurally that is done.

Yes, it’s a little early Troy. We are not been 100% completed. I mentioned we need to confirm a couple of regulatory and legal matters on that to make sure that ducks are kind of in a row there. But I expect that to not take too long and it will be a formal program or we’ve committed that amount and to the extent we can purchase on the secondary market, will do so.

Can you also just give us -- you’ve done a lot of portfolio optimization. Just as you look at the portfolio, you did say you expect slower, maybe slower activity going forward. I’m assuming this is because there are fewer opportunities for portfolio optimization. So, as you look to raise capital to make new investments, can you just speak to how much of embedded liquidity in the portfolio that you see today?

It’s hard for me to put a number on that. And as you’ve pointed out you’ve got some optimization opportunities there. And as we find deals that we like from our risk and return standpoint, let’s are more attractive than what we’re currently holding, then we’ll cycle in to that name and out of another. But in some sense everything is available to be cycled out of it one point or another. And so we don’t try to target a certain next year every quarter; we really try to take it name by name. We’re seeing things that we like. We have there opportunity to be selective here because we also like where the portfolio sits. It’s got an attractive yield and attractive from a risk and return standpoint.

And one final one. Could you just give us some color on the Golden Pear Funding investment? I saw you increased your commitment there quite a bit in the quarter. And I saw in the news that they’ve done senior secured facility energy near facility. Where in the capital stack are you, how much that is in front of you and just give us a little bit color on that investment if you could?

It’s a name that we’ve known for a while. I think you saw in our portfolio last quarter. And we did increase our exposure there that was part of our plan from the beginning on that name that we thought that we would have opportunity to participate in the next facility. We are in the second lien there. And it’s a business that we understand and like we’ve known similar businesses on H.I.G. side for a while and so we’re pretty comfortable increasing our exposure there.

Our next question comes from Dan Nicolas [ph] with Robert W. Baird.

Jay, I was just hoping you could kind of provide an update, high level overview of where the deal sources are coming from now relative to H.I.G. and the broader sponsored to or non-sponsored community, just trying to get kind of a breakdown of what you’re seeing in the recent deals and the pipeline?

We still see a healthy number of things coming across the trend, from the broader H.I.G. platform. As we’ve talked about on other calls, there is a large number of investment professionals around the country who are looking at middle market deals from an equity and debt perspective. They don’t necessarily fit into the fund where the first guy has a look at it. And to the extent opportunity comes up that fits WhiteHorse better than it does one of the other H.I.G. funds, we’ll try those ideas and have a chance to look at that. In addition, we’ve been expanding our direct effort on H.I.G. WhiteHorse side, on the WhiteHorse Finance side. You’ve seen a couple of press releases this quarter where we made some hires around the country with people who are investment professional mostly focus on originating deals in the middle market. And so, you’re getting idea from that front as well. As far as sponsored and non-sponsored, it’s really idiosyncratic; it’s hard to say where each of those is coming from. We tend to lean towards the non-sponsored where we can and sometimes we do end up with sponsored deal. But in general, I would say that our experience for last couple of quarters has been what we’ve seen the prior six that there is a lot of different places that it comes from and it’s lumpy. That’s just the way the business goes. You don’t know exactly where the next opportunity is coming.

And just as you kind of think about the balance sheet going forward, any update on how you all might be thinking about pursuing an SBIC or not down the road?

I think we’ve talked about this on other call that we’re certainly aware that that’s something attractive and that there is other guys who are -- who have that opportunity and can avail themselves of that. We’re looking at it as just like anybody else would but I don’t have anything concrete to talk about today.

And just a follow-up to that; if you were to kind of have, characterize your deal flow now or the current portfolio that sits now, what -- any idea or what percentage of the portfolio or deal flow might kind of fit SBIC criteria or you not kind of got in that far in the process.

I’m not really tracking that right now to be honest with you. It’s something that we would look at closer if you’re going to get very serious about it. We look at it from time to time. And it really does kind of low quarter to quarter. So, some quarter it seems like you’ve got a lot that look like would fit generally and sometimes you don’t.

[Operator Instructions] You have a follow-up question from the line of Troy Ward with KBW.

Just a follow-up on that SBIC question, and I don’t -- again just because I felt like the call was going to be over, I just really like to get your more of in-depth thought process about that, because, I mean as you look at your balance sheet, you are capital constrained, at this point and the SBIC capital does not count against your debt to equity from a regulatory standpoint. So, this would seem like the perfect time to get serious about it and really think hard and understand -- shareholders understand if you are going to apply for that. So, I guess why aren’t you being more active or proactive in looking at the SBIC? Is it a time commitment, what is the thought process there?

I am glad followed up, Troy, because I didn’t want to leave you with that impression that we’re just not taking it seriously because -- there are several things to your point about capital constraint, there are several things that we’re exploring and the support from H.I.G. I think is one of the things that makes -- that helps support the stock and there’s other things that will help support the liquidity of other company and our balance sheet. The SBIC thing is as you pointed out, one of the more attractive options there. We are taking a very serious look at that, but we’re also not inclined to talk about exactly where we are on projects on the capital front, just because -- for competitive reasons. But you’re exactly right. That’s attractive way that BDCs can expand their balance sheet without getting outsized on their regulatory leverage front.

Because internally as we spoke -- or speaking we are in the midst of earning seasons, we’re talking about a lot of different aims. But as we look at your performance since your IPO, you’ve maintained that $15 plus book value. You’ve delivered exactly what you said. And clearly, you’re not being rewarded from a stock perspective. And I know that’s frustrating and to us one of the most frustrating --- from where we sit, it seems like this could be one of the kind of the low hanging fruit that you can just paw ahead and say okay, we’re just going to keep our head down and doing a good job. And here is something we can, again, grow the portfolio, grow what we’re doing without new equity and make a real difference from a shareholder perspective and hopefully it’ll be recognized and you can move closer to book value. So again, just glad you provided additional color and hopefully it’s a path you explore much greater in the next several quarters.

I appreciate it. Thanks for banging the drum for us Troy. We think we have done fairly well since the IPO. So, we’re pleased to have the call this quarter and kind of talk about those results.

This does conclude today’s teleconference call. Thank you for your participation. All participants may disconnect at this time. And have a wonderful day.