Good morning, and welcome to Wiley's First Quarter Fiscal Year 2021 Earnings Call. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. At this, I'd like to introduce Wiley's Vice President of Investor Relations, Brian Campbell. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, and welcome to Wiley's first quarter 2021 earnings update. On the call with me are Brian Napack, President and Chief Executive Officer; and John Kritzmacher, Chief Financial Officer. A few reminders to start, the call is being recorded and may include forward-looking statements. You shouldn't rely on these statements as actual results may differ materially and are subject to factors discussed in our SEC filings. The company does not undertake any obligations to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. Wiley provides non-GAAP measures as a supplement to evaluate underlying operating profitability and performance trends. These measures do not have standardized meanings prescribed by U.S. GAAP and therefore, may not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies, nor should they be viewed as alternatives to measures under GAAP. Please see the reconciliation of all non-GAAP measures presented in the supplementary information included in our press release. Unless otherwise noted, we will refer to non-GAAP metrics on the call, and variances are on a year-over-year basis and won't exclude the impact of currency unless otherwise specified. After the call, a copy of this presentation and a playback of the webcast will be available on our Investor Relations web page. I'll now turn the call over to Wiley's President and CEO, Brian Napack.

Good morning, everyone. Right now, educators and students around the world are heading back to school and researchers are heading back into their labs in a world significantly altered by COVID-19. As they do, they're rewriting the playbooks for education and research. From our advantage point, it's clear that they're turning to digital content, platforms and services at unprecedented levels. And they're also turning to corporate partners such as Wiley, who can help them achieve their goals in a changed world. The result for Wiley is that across the company, demand for our digital products and services has grown markedly. This unusual moment is moving our markets and proving that the strategies that we have been pursuing are not only right for the market today, they are right for where the market is going in the long-term. We had a solid first quarter of revenue and earnings performance despite the disrupted environment. This demonstrated both resilience of our business and tight alignment of our strategies with the market's evolving needs. We'll talk specifics about our performance shortly, but it's important to note that today's acute health, economic and social problems serve to reinforce the value of Wiley's mission. Over the past months, we've moved faster to validate and publish more research and have made thousands of critical COVID related research studies freely available. We've helped many university, schools and corporations around corporations around the world to more quickly migrate from traditional to virtual learning. And we spent lots of time in our communities, raised money for causes that address injustice and taking concrete actions to ensure diversity, equity and inclusion within Wiley. We continue to be reminded of the racial inequality plaguing our society and the need for corporate citizens such as us to play an active role in dismantling…

Thank you, Brian. Despite a very challenging environment, we are generally pleased with our revenue and earnings performance for this quarter. That said, our cash flow from operations and free cash flow were unfavorable to prior year by $27 million and $20 million, respectively, primarily due to the timing of changes in working capital. As a reminder, our cash flow is normally the use of cash in the first half of our fiscal year due to the timing of collection for general subscriptions, which are concentrated in the third and fourth quarters. Capital expenditures, including technology, property and equipment and product development spending, declined $6 million to $24 million for the quarter. As discussed on the last earnings call, we expect full year capital expenditures to be approximately $100 million, with investment focused on new product and service capabilities as well as process redesign and workflow automation. With respect to investment in acquisitions, we will remain opportunistic and continue our pursuit of attractive opportunities to add scale and provide enhanced tech-enabled products and services in both research and online education. In terms of our balance sheet, our quarter end debt balance was up $117 million, primarily due to acquisitions. But our interest expense was lower by $1.5 million, as we realized the benefit of the lower interest rate environment. Our leverage ratio at quarter end was 2.0 times, inclusive of all acquisitions. In terms of access to capital, we recorded $101 million of cash on hand, and we ended the quarter with undrawn revolving credit of $650 million. Our strong balance sheet, consistency of annual cash flows and ample liquidity afford us the flexibility to continue investing, acquiring and returning cash to shareholders. In June, the company modestly increased its quarterly dividend for the 27th consecutive year. Our current dividend…

Thanks, John. So, to recap the main messages for today. Our business remains strong through the pandemic, with good momentum continuing in both Research and Education Services. We're experiencing COVID-related disruptions to print books and in-person training. Of course, this represents a smaller part of Wiley today with nearly 80% of our revenue coming from digital products and tech-enabled services. Core trends remain favorable in Wiley's key strategic areas of focus, such as peer-reviewed research, online education, digital content and courseware. We're taking full advantage of this unusual moment to drive improvement in the cost structure and core function of Wiley, focusing on high potential areas, such as our content development workflows, our management of the customer life cycle and the tuning of our real estate footprint for an increasingly virtual workforce. Overall, we're confident in the enduring importance of our Research and Education content, platforms and services. But more importantly, we're optimistic that this challenging moment -- at this challenging moment, because we're seeing compelling evidence in our KPIs that our markets are strong and their strategies are working. To be specific, we're experiencing strong growth in demand to publish in our journals and consumer research. Strong growth in Research platform signings, recurring revenue and content consumption with 98% client retention; strong growth in our digital courseware portfolio; strong growth in enrollment at our online degree programs and increased interest of universities in accelerating the transition to online education. So despite some near-term headwinds, the data tells me that we're tightly aligned with the current and long-term needs of our customers, the researchers, students, professors, administrators and corporate leaders that we serve worldwide. Once again, I want to thank our wonderful Wiley colleagues around the world for their grit, their positive spirit and their remarkable accomplishments this quarter. With that, I'll open the floor to your comments and questions.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Daniel Moore with CJS Securities.

Brian, John, good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. I wanted to start with Research. Obviously, a really solid growth in a difficult environment. How much of the jump in article output and content consumption would you contribute to COVID related research? And as a follow-up, how much of the jump in research revenue and EBITDA reflects things like reprints and backfiles, open access? Just trying to get a sense for that relative to maybe the kind of legacy Research business if you will?

Yes. I'll start, and John can chip in. So we're seeing -- definitely seeing good momentum in Research publishing. The COVID crisis has definitely increased the interest in -- or the output of researchers, and we see no signs of that declining. With respect to specific COVID related research, we certainly are publishing more COVID related papers as you would expect, but as a percentage of our total, it's a very small percentage. It's really a much broader increase in demand that we're seeing at this point in time that's coming across the portfolio. And to answer your second question. A large portion of that is coming in open access. So we're seeing really good growth rates in our open access pay-to-publish models, which as you know is a price times quantity model, so when that happens that translates directly into our revenue base. So we're definitely feeling consistent and increasing demand and the practices that we've taken in the marketplace, which have been very market friendly. We believe are leading researchers to choose Wiley and choose our journal.

Indeed, and I know a specifically is it more article output from the same customers, more interest from new parties. How would you, sort of, weigh those two?

Well, in open access, the researchers themselves are deciding where to submit their articles, and as they do, they are choosing the titles, meaning the journal titles and the publishers that they want to work with. So, increasingly, it's a almost a B2C model in that case, and so things like the reputation, the quality of the customer experience, the research experience as they go through the publishing process, the speed with which the article gets out, and the quality with which it gets promoted are what drives that. So, we believe that we're seeing researchers choose us, quite simply stated. If that answers your question, Dan. If I didn't answer it specifically, please follow-up.

No, that helps absolutely. Maybe one or two quick follow ups. Given the growth in OA, if we were to breakdown research between kind of annual contract of revenue versus more variable or consumption based, what would that look like at this stage percentage wise?

Well, look, certainly, go ahead John. Yeah.

I'll answer this in a way that is also responsive, Dan, to your question about what was the composition of revenue on a quarter. Roughly speaking, about 80% of our revenue comes from the combination of subscriptions and open access, and within that call it 70% of our research publishing business is subscription and about 10% of is OA, the remaining 20% of our business Dan is frankly largely products and services that are derivatives of articles that are published under subscription, such as reprints that you mentioned and such as corporate advertising. So that's roughly the split of revenue that we have today. And, of course, the subscription basis is largely contracted, right? So that's well in play, but we're coming up on a renewal season. You asked whether -- you asked about are there significant backfile revenues or such in the quarter and the answer to that is, no. This was a pretty normal quarter for us in terms of the composition of products and services that drove our revenue.

That's helpful because that can be really high margin. One more and I'll jump out. But you alluded Brian to, obviously, the extraordinary pressures that universities will be facing. Given where the stock is and has been trading, I think there's a lot more fear out there than may or may not until we'll see, but I know you don't want to get into the guidance. But when you think about research, is there a range, I guess, one, how are those initial dialogues going for calendar 2021? And two, is there a range of revenue growth that you might be able to at an extreme high, extreme low bracket to sort of rein in some of the fears out there. Maybe it's too early, but I thought I'd give you the opportunity? Thank you.

Yes, yes. Look, I mean, it's a completely fair question, and it's what we want to know as well. We're talking to our customers very, very closely. And we're trying to get a sense of it. But it's really early in the renewal season. And so it's really is too early to tell. We do expect some price pressure. But we expect that, that price pressure should be offset by this strong growth that you're seeing in OA and in platforms and other areas. So the simple answer is it's too early to tell, but that we believe that the price pressure we face will be modest, and that it will be largely offset, if not more than offset by our Open Access growth.

Okay. Helpful. I'll jump back in queue if any follow-up. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Drew Crum with Stifel.

Hey, guys. Good morning. So Brian, historically, when GDP is fallen and unemployment has risen, enrollment trends have accelerated. And listening to your preamble, it doesn't sound like that's what you're seeing or anticipating for the fall semester, but just want to get more detail around that. And then on a related note, the 4% organic growth for Ed Services that you reported in the quarter, is that indicative of what we should anticipate for the balance of fiscal 2021? And then I have a follow-up. Thanks. A –Brian Napack: Got it. So from the perspective of the demand patterns in higher Ed, this – there's no question that there is a relationship between GDP, unemployment and college enrollment. That – historically, that relationship has been one with a bit of a lag, a 12 to 18 months lag. And so we do expect that to play out here, and we believe we're already seeing it in our leads and our interest in our enrollment. But really, traditionally, that's played out over time. What's happening now in enrollment is different than that, though. What's happening now is literally a practical preclusion on universities from running schools as they normally have and a depression or a downward pressure on enrollment that's come from healthier related to being in large groups of people, as everybody knows. So what we're seeing, the enrollment pressure we're seeing is not some sort of an inverse relationship to the tradition. It's in fact, it's a novel pressure. And that novel pressure was expected in the fall to be in the neighborhood of 10% or 15%, we think it could be on the lower end of that. But from Wiley's perspective, and this is really important, from Wiley's perspective, our – and that has – that by…

Got it. Okay. Very helpful. And then, I know, you spent a lot of time talking about Open Access and it obviously had a very good quarter, just any updated thoughts around the sustainability of that growth? And then, separately, John, can you address the timing-related working capital issues that impacted your cash flow during the quarter? Thanks.

Okay. I'll pick up the OA question first. Long before COVID, we were seeing significantly greater volumes of submissions and consequent volumes of our output. That has continued an increase through COVID. We see no reason to believe that it's not going to continue. There might be a slight elevation now that's related to researchers being at home and finishing up papers. You think that would have been done already, and yet the elevated levels continue. And in fact, they're increasing. So we're very bullish on those volumes levels continuing at a high level on a go-forward basis.

And then, Drew, on your question with respect to cash flow and in particular, the impact of working capital that I referenced in my comments, which were the biggest drivers. I mean, by the way, we had very strong performance in the quarter from a real earnings growth perspective. But then working capital played against us. And in particular, I would note that, our cash collections associated with journals were pretty strong and in line with our expectations. So we're feeling good about collections there. We do have some customers that have requested extended terms, but it's not a material impact to our results, and we feel like that's flowing well. The most significant impact on the timing of working capital has to do with payables. In the March, late March and April time frame, like others, we went into a bit of a cash conservation mode, given potential risks around liquidity in the market at that point in time. And so we put some pressure on payables at that time. And then as things began to ease up in our first quarter, we also eased up on payables. So the ground that we gave up on cash flow in the quarter is particularly concentrated around payables, and it's just the normal flow back to a balance after conserving cash at the end of the fourth quarter.

Okay. All right, guys, appreciate it. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thanks Drew.

Our next question comes from Sami Kassab with Exane.

Good morning, Brian. Good morning, John. Thanks for taking my questions. I have three of them, please. The first one is on a topic that I think you've just touched on, but I would, kind of, like you to perhaps elaborate a little bit more. On open access, what's the risk that the elevated levels of submissions that we've seen actually reflect the fact that scientists have been locked down at home and away from their labs and had a lot of time to write papers, but had no ability to make progress on their scientific research, and that -- those three, four months will actually, six months, 12 months down the road will lead to a slowdown in open access growth as science did not really happen for the lockdowns? Secondly, on China, we've seen the Chinese government communicate new research, appraisal policies, pushing Chinese scientists to publish more into Chinese local language genres capitalizing DAPCs, moving away from challenge like we see. Do you think the China policy and regulatory changes may have an impact? Or is that too small to matter? Is that not something that is big on your radar screen? And lastly, can you elaborate a little bit on how you see the regulatory environment in OPM? We've had the likes of Bob Sherman and Senator Warren look at OPM, do you think the regulatory environment could be at risk of changing? Or do you think it's a solid regime that you have today? And you have no major concerns on the regulatory front for OPM? Thank you gentlemen.

Well, thank you very much for asking three questions, each of which is a dissertation. So I'll take them one at a time. They're very good questions. Excellent questions that I'd be asking if I were you. So the first one, on the risk of the elevated level of OA, sort of, bringing back to some lower level later. We are now six or more months into this pandemic, seven or eight, depending on where you're looking in the world. We continue to see elevated levels. We continue to see researchers putting out papers. Researchers are going back into the labs absolutely. And so we're -- we expect it to continue at some level. Could it come back a little bit? Of course, it could. We're at a very high level right now. But I will remind you that trends in research are very, very positive in terms of overall increasing volume of output in the marketplace. So in other words, we see mid to high single-digit increases in the volume of papers every year. And that strong proceed of the environment, we consider that, that will continue in the future. The second thing is that the – that research continues to be – something that is funded at a very high level in countries around the world. We see no – we see no signs of that declining. So, yes, I mean, there's no question that there could be a little bit of an artificial increase. But those artificial – those increases have continued for quite some time now. The final thing I'd say on that is. We believe that our publishing program and our approach to publishing is extremely researcher and market friendly, and we think we're getting more than our fair share of submissions. I will also…

Thank you very much. I'm sorry, Brian, just squeezing the floor before we move to OPM subscription unbundling, and as said, have you seen some strong kick up assert on one universities and then sub within less than a year. Do you see a trend or risk towards more unbundling of the big deals, especially in the U.S. as universities face budgetary pressure?

Okay. So if the question is about unbundling and whether we are seeing more or we'll be seeing more. As universities face pressure, they certainly are -- they certainly are looking for ways to save costs. I've said, we can't really comment on what we expect that pricing pressure to be, but as we look into the market, we don't see a lot of evidence. We see some one-off cases, but we don't see a lot of evidence of universities and university librarians, saying, we don't need that content, our researchers don't need it, we're not using it. So to the extent that we have a high, which we do a very high quality portfolio of journals that is essential to the success of research, we will continue to be purchased by those universities. I'll remind you that academics make their careers based upon research and universities climb the rankings or descend in the rankings based upon their positioning in the research ecosystem in both the volume and the quality of their output. So research and research content is absolutely essential to the success of our important clients. So while we may see some edge cases, because to be sure, there's pressure in the marketplace. We don't see any evidence of a large-scale trend toward unbundling.

Thank you.

Okay. And let me move toward OPM. So the conversation about OPM has gone on for a long time, and the conversation about the revenue share model has gone on for a long period of time. We start from the position that we have excellent relationships, long-term relationships with our universities, and we help those universities fundamentally to succeed. We help them to succeed by providing extremely high-quality programs, by attracting students and by matriculating those students at extremely high completion rates, higher completion rates than typically they see in their on-ground programs. So insofar as we are doing that, we are helping those universities to succeed. There has long been a conversation about the revenue share model. Our clients seem to be fine with it. Now to be sure, there will be some movement in the marketplace there. And therefore, Wiley has adopted again, as we always do, very market friendly practices of working with universities on terms that they believe are fair. And we have our bundled revenue share model businesses. We have our fee-for-service businesses and so forth. So we believe wherever the market goes, we're going to be fine. Having said that, we participate very closely in the discussions that go on in Washington and elsewhere, on the future of education, generally speaking, and on the future of higher ed and its relationship with service providers. So we've responded to the various inquiries. They have been ongoing. We expect them to continue to be ongoing, but we're very close to it, and we are not -- our confidence in the future is based upon the fact that we're in a consensual relationship, if you call it, with our partners, who are getting a tremendous amount out of it. If we together or if they decide they want to go in a different direction, we're very happy to go in a different direction with them, and we always have been. So we don't view it as a major threat. It's something to be talked about, it's something to be studied, it’s something to be adapted to. But we are confident in our position and more importantly, the position and the quality of the services and the value of the services that we provide to the marketplace.

This is fantastic and all very convincing. Thank you, Brian. You said in your opening remark that you had higher completion rate, did you mean that your OPM programs has higher completion rate than equivalent on-campus programs have?

Typically speaking, our programs, I will say, our programs have very high completion rates for the students that start to this and those that complete the program. I'll remind you that historically, when the industry has come under pressure, it has been for universities and education providers that have had extremely low completion rates, such that students started, but they never finished and therefore, never got value for the education that they paid for or that somebody else such as the government or the taxpayer paid for. That is absolutely not the case in our programs. The completion rates are extremely high, and our clients are happy with them. And clearly, students are happy with them, because they're staying through to completion and achieving career outcomes that perpetuate the demand for the product.

Excellent. Thank you very much for all the time you’ve given me. Thank you, Brain.

Our next question comes from Brett Reiss with Janney Montgomery Scott.

Good morning, gentlemen. The -- prior to COVID rearing its ugly head, margins were eroding. Was that from your conversion from the hard copy to digital? Or did it relate to state cutbacks in education?

John, do you want to pick that up?

Yeah. I mean, just generally, looking back over fiscal year 2020, we did see some erosion of our margin. I would say that, the most significant drivers behind that erosion of margin were two; one was the rapid -- continued rapid decline of print, which has reasonably good margins. But print, as we know, is in decline, and that rate of decline got a bit faster in the past fiscal year and had an impact on our bottom line. We're taking actions, as we discussed in today's review to improve the profitability of that business by focusing and by -- in particular, focusing our future on digital courseware and digital content. The second factor that contributed overall to the shift in the blended margin of the business, there's an increased component of our revenue coming from OPM business that we just talked about. And we recognize that in its current state, the market itself in its current state that operating margins are low. But we've been emphasizing that we are balancing between top line growth, which is very important to us and improving profitability there. And we said that, we would drive that business to a 15% EBITDA margin by next year, and we're well on the March to get there. But those are the two factors that have been putting pressure on our margin, and both of them are being addressed.

If the -- going forward, there are continued high levels of unemployment, is that a tailwind and that there's a tendency for enrollments in school to go up in that, kind of, macroeconomic environment?

Yeah. So I'll pick that back up, John. As I was indicating earlier, there is a long-term, and in fact, I think it was either Dan or Drew that pointed it out, there is a long-term established pattern of when the economy goes down and unemployment goes up, that people go back to school. That relationship is typically a lags relationship, meaning it happens not instantly, it happens 12 months to 18 months later, and we do expect to see that. But we have other tailwinds that are hitting us right now, which is simply that people can't go to school in person. They're physically precluded from going to school fully in person. And so, therefore, we have elevated levels of interest from potential students in taking education in an online world. It also is providing a tailwind, as I indicated earlier, to our digital courseware businesses, which as I indicated in my remarks are seeing record increases in usage and adoption. Because, again, if you're not in a physical setting, you need a learning management system based product, something that where your teacher can make assignments where you can do homework, where you can get the content predictably, the content that the teacher needs, not have to Google for your curriculum. And physical books just aren't as good in those environments. They don't do all those things. And so there's a significant tailwind that hits you in that sense. And again, as I indicated, the – we believe that these are accelerations of long-term trends, so that it won't be a short-term blip. We believe that we're going to see continued elevation of those levels, which is completely – all of these trends that I'm talking about are completely in sync and aligned with our strategy that we've been working on for the last few years. And it's gratifying to see it start to come to fruition at a time when the world needs both education and research more than ever.

Great. Thank you for taking my questions. I appreciate it.

Absolutely.

And I'm not showing any further questions at this time. I'd like to turn the call back over to our hosts for any closing remarks.

Yes, that's me, the host. Thank you very much all for joining us today, and we'll look forward to reviewing our second quarter results in December. Wish you all good luck and good health, and we'll see you soon.

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's presentation. You may now disconnect, and have a wonderful day.