Sure. Absolutely. I mean, look. Given the uncertain environment, what we see in terms of science funding in The U.S, but also, you know, just to the general state of affairs these days. It makes sense for us to approach 26 I think, with a balanced mix of discipline and flexibility. And so, you know, our guidance reflects that. A measured view of the macro environment, headwinds from geopolitical risk, we've baked that in policy volatility, global funding trends. It's all baked in in education and in research. And, you know, that said, our business is globally diversified. Half of revenue comes from outside The United States. So much of the portfolio is digital and recurring with multiyear contracts. It gives us a really strong base to plan from. And so, we've made a lot of progress on the cost alignment, the margin expansion, simplification of the platform, the operations. That gives us more levers to pull if the environment. And I think we're preparing for that. And as Matt and Chris have already indicated, the discipline around margin expansion remains constant, remains a robust strategy no matter what in the face of any kind of uncertainty on the revenue side. So we're actively modeling this stuff. We're looking at R&D budget scenarios. As Matt talked about, we're planning with the sales teams to try to go where our customers are, support them if they're in need of support. We're looking at corporate R&D spending trajectories too as a way of, providing new avenues for growth. AI is obviously a new avenue for growth. And, clearly, on the learning side, monitoring things like enrollment. So across the board, I think we're going into this eyes wide open prepared, and I think you know, you'll get updates from us regularly throughout the year on how we're viewing things.