Good morning and welcome to the Worthington Industries' Fourth Quarter 2015 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. I'd now like to introduce Ms. Cathy Lyttle, Vice President of Corporate Communications and Investor Relations. Ms. Lyttle, you may now begin.

Thank you, Greg. Good morning. Thanks for joining us on our fourth quarter and fiscal year-end earnings conference call. As a reminder, certain statements made on this call are forward-looking within the meaning of the 1995 Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. These statements are subject to risk and uncertainties and could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested. Please review our earnings release issued last evening for more detail on those factors that could cause actual results to differ materially. We will have a replay of today's call a little bit later on our website. On our call this morning with you; Mark Russell, President and Chief Operating Officer and Andy Rose, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Andy will begin.

Thank you Cathy and good morning everyone. The company had a mixed year in FY '15. After several years of strong growth, we were unable to achieve our goal of year-over-year growth in earnings. Macro headwinds from declining steel and oil prices and operational challenges in cylinders and engineered cabs hindered profits. After adjusting for restructuring and nonrecurring charges, the company earned $2.12 per share for the year, down 11% from $2.37 per share in 2014. EBITDA adjusted for impairment charges was $327 million, down 6% from $347 million in 2014. The biggest driver of these declines was $0.17 per share of FIFO inventory holding losses occurred in 2015 compared to $0.03 per share of gains in 2014. Adjusting for the impact of FIFO, the company earned $2.29 per share in 2015 versus $2.34 per share in 2014. For the fourth quarter, the company earned $0.53 per share adjusted for restructuring charges. Adjusting further for the $0.10 per share of FIFO losses during the quarter, we would have earned $0.63 per share. The quarter included several unique items. $3.7 million of repair costs related to design fixes on our CNG fuel systems and obsolete inventory in oil and gas. The company benefited from a $5.5 million foreign tax credit related to the closure of our Indian cylinders joint venture which reduced our effective tax rate by 5%. Impairment and restructuring charges totaling $6.5 million or $0.09 per share, resulted from a goodwill write-off related to the sale of our aluminum high pressure business in Mississippi and obsolete intangibles related to our CNG fuel systems business. Equity income from our joint ventures during the quarter was down modestly across most joint ventures, but the big miss was at Serviacero where declining steel prices hurt margins. For the year WAVE and ArtiFlex…

Direct volume in our steel business was down 1% in the quarter compared to last year, excluding in Rome and TWB. Metal Service Center Institute data for the same period showed direct shipments down nearly 8%, indicating our continued strength in the direct market. Demand from our mill and service center customers for toll pickling and galvanizing was even with last year, with the exception of one facility which was still off significantly which pushed our overall toll volume down an average of 18%. By market and excluding our recent Rome, New York strip acquisition, automotive shipments to the Detroit Three were down 1%. Other automotive shipments were flat. Heavy truck continued to show some strength and was up 10%. Construction was our strongest segment, with shipments up 24%. Agriculture was down 39% and again was our weakest segment. The integration of our Rome cold-rolled strip acquisition continues on pace. And the performance of the business is meeting and in some cases exceeding our expectations at this point. Our joint venture strip processing facility with Nisshin at MISI in China remains on track for startup in the first half of calendar 2016. The growth of the steel company's Tailor Welded Blanks joint venture with Wuhan Iron and Steel continues. Our latest new facility in Nashville is on track to start production this fall. TWB has introduced several new products to the market. Curvilinear welded blanks and Tailor Welded coil products for highly efficient coil-fed stamping applications are both now in full commercial production. Friction stir welding of aluminum blanks continues to show promise in ongoing OEM trials. Our Serviacero joint venture in Mexico also continues to grow, with another shipment record on the back of the rapidly growing Mexican automotive manufacturing base. Pressure cylinders, oil and gas equipment sales were…

[Operator Instructions]. Your first question comes from the line of Phil Gibbs from KeyBanc Capital Bank. Please go ahead.

Had a question on the FIFO holding losses, do you have a pretax number there? Just curious as to what tax rate you are using? Some pretext would be helpful, if you have that? And then there was something else that you pointed out, outside the tax piece that may have been special to the cylinders results. Just looking for some color on that?

We'll work on the first part for you, Phil. The second part of your question was?

You had called something out between the tax commentary and the FIFO holding loss commentary that may have been unique to the results?

Our tax rate benefited by about 5%, it was about 5% lower because of a foreign tax credit due to some tax planning around the closure of our Indian cylinders joint venture. It is not in cylinder's operating results. It just affects our tax rate.

Okay. So nothing unique within cylinders itself?

Correct.

Okay, and then in terms of the big outflow of capital into payables, anything unique there as to why that was trued up so aggressively in the quarter?

I don't have a great answer there. Typically when that happens, it is just timing of payables. We buy so much steel, north of $1 billion a year, that depending on when the payment happens and when the quarter cutoff is, that can swing payables pretty dramatically. There's nothing systemic inside the business that is driving that.

Okay. Bigger question for Mark, just on the transformation and DJ and what you are seeing in cylinders right now and why you expect this round to be potentially more successful than the first go-round, I guess and the transformation in that piece of the business?

I feel like what we're doing is we go through the same process where we do it diagnostic and we get the best data we can get and then we start postulating improvements and start driving them. The difference is we used to kick that work off and then leave it to a local team to continue it. What we're doing now is the entire team, including myself, stays. And for the first week we all work together on it, you, me, here, now kind of theme. We try to accelerate everything and get it to go deeper and faster. So far that appears to be working. So that's why we're excited about it. It's the same kind of improvements we've seen in the past, that you saw in our steel company as we did that work starting some years ago. But we think it will -- it can go deeper and faster with this new approach.

The approach of you being more hands-on and then DJ being in the mix, is that the thought process?

Not just me. We have the entire executive team that comes to kick it off. We stay for the week and we all do the work. Actually and there's another tweak, Phil, we actually started the work with two days of pre-work with the commercial team. We bring the commercial team in as well and we work on everything from supply chain operations to sales. The actual process is seven working days if you include the commercial part which happens typically right before the operations work kicks off.

Lastly and I will hop back into the queue, any update on the Turkish Cryo facility and the ramp and then what you are seeing there? Thanks.

It's on track. We're moving from the legacy kind of abounded facility in Istanbul to a brand-new state-of-the-art facility that we constructed in Bandirma which is about two hours southwest along the water from Istanbul. That is a perfect location for us in an international investor park and we're laying that out to be the best facility in the world to produce cryogenic products. It's on track. It's caused a lot of disruption as we're split between the two facilities. The market is not great with the spreads being compressed between LNG and diesel right now. We expect that to continue, but it's going to be gradual. It'll be open in 2016.

Phil, back to a question on for FIFO we're using a tax rate of 35%, kind of the standard corporate rate as opposed to our effective rate for the year.

On that $0.10 number?

Yes.

Your next question comes from the line of John Tumazos from John Tumazos Independent Research. Please go ahead.

Could you describe the CapEx outlook for FY '16, particular large projects or items of emphasis? In terms of acquisition priorities, are there any sectors you're more interested in? For example, while the auto market is near record, flat rolled steeled is depressed with selling prices. We read of service centers going bankrupt in the trade press almost every week. Also the oil and gas sector is very depressed. The natural gas sector is very depressed. It would seem like it would be a better-than-average time to go hunting.

Yes. I mean, maybe just to the acquisition question first, John. I don't disagree that the time to be more aggressive is when prices are low and there is less competition for buying companies or assets. I would say for us right now particularly in the oil and gas, we've invested a reasonable amount of capital over the last three years. We're spending a lot of time working to make that business, to really optimize the footprint, make it more efficient. And also start to cross-sell some of the newer separator technologies across our footprint. So I don't anticipate that's going to be a huge area of focus for us. We continue to look at opportunities. We always look. But at least for the time being, we're in a little bit of digestion period, at least in that segment, really generally speaking, in cylinders. We've grown a lot through acquisition over the past five or six years. We just went through a reorganization in terms of management in the business. So I think we continue to view acquisitions as part of our strategy to grow the company, but maybe not as aggressive right now as we have been over the past five years. It's also a little frothy out there, to be honest. Prices are pretty steep. Low cost capital is available and so there's a lot of buyers. I think we're going to be a little more cautious right now on that front.

I would add that, of course, we're always open to high confidence tuck-in acquisitions in our core. Example of that would be Rome and Fry Reglet deals we just did.

Your answer on CapEx is last year I think we were just under $100 million, John and I would say that's probably a pretty good proxy for next year as well.

Is there any particular projects that are noteworthy in that $100 million?

The good news there is probably 2/3rds of it, maybe even three-quarters is capacity expansion. We're adding facilities in Tailor Welded Blanks we're adding some capacity in the steel company and the cold rolling strip business. We're finishing out the build-out of the cylinders Turkey plant. So I would say the lion's share of the CapEx centers around capacity expansion where we've got bottlenecks and productivity improvements.

If I could ask one last question, is it a fair assumption as we enter the fiscal year June 1 that across all your different businesses, your steel inventories are close to trough prices given the different spot market benchmarks, seem to be bottoming in March, April and May?

I would say we're close. There is always a quarter lag, basically. Prices have recently stopped going down. They appear to have stabilized, maybe a slight uptick. But it will take us a quarter to work through the downward prices. So we do anticipate some FIFO headwinds for the next quarter. But after that, you are right. We should be right at rock-bottom prices and our spreads should level out again.

Your next question comes from the line of Luke Folta from Jefferies. Please go ahead.

First question I had is on the Cabs business. I just wanted to clarify. With the closure that you've had, even if demand stays where it is, you are expecting that business to be profitable going forward? Is that something we should be thinking about as early as this quarter?

No. We have to finish the consolidation first, Phil -- or Luke, sorry. Luke, the plant won't close until the end of September. And then we'll have some ongoing cost as we continue to move guys and close things out. But within a couple of quarters you should see us return.

Okay. And then on the cylinders business, you're not seeing the release, the volumes of the force came down quite a bit, the oil and gas piece of that. Would you say that if you strip out the restructuring stuff, has that business, do think, gotten to as bad as it is going to get with the pullback we've seen in oil and gas? Or is there, I guess, are we still on the way down? Is the trajectory there is still going down heading into the next quarter or two?

Yes. I mean the way I would characterize it is the prices have stopped going down, maybe even ticked back up a little bit to the point where there is some increasing activity. But there was such a backlog of equipment in the sector that I would say our business probably hasn't quite reached the bottom. We're probably pretty close, to be honest. We took pretty drastic action last quarter to scale the business to where we thought it made sense and we could keep it profitable and that's our goal for this business. It's some uncertainty out there in terms of what the E&P companies are going to do, how their CapEx budgets are going to change for the coming year. I think most people are saying is, they are pretty confident that calendar 2016 is going to be better than 2015, but the back half of 2015 is still a little bit of an open question.

Luke, in the short run with completions down in the range of 75%, that can't help but be a headwind for us, that's the bad news. The good news is with that kind of adjustment, that's breathtaking adjustment they will eat through that backlog pretty quickly.

Regarding steel prices, I think I understood what you were saying in terms of steel inventory costs. When you look at the impact of your selling prices in the steel business, I know there's some lags built in there. Would you say in terms of the FIFO inventory impact, is that something we should be thinking about as similar sequentially in the August quarter? And then in terms of your selling prices as reported, has that come down to now fully reflect, I guess, what the spot pricing environment is currently? Is there another quarter of pick-up?

Well you have to tell me what steel prices are going to be in July and August before I can tell you what the FIFO for the quarter is going to be. So a little bit--

Assuming flat.

Yes. I mean, again it's hard for me to say is its the same. I do think we still are facing some headwinds. To be honest, I'm pretty optimistic that hopefully we can have less of a headwind in this quarter, but that being said, the quarter has still got to play out.

If you assume that they are flat, then we still have carryover. It would be less because it would only be on the quarter. If you are going to assume -- again, you said you have to know what the prices to assume what it is other than that.

Yes. As an example and this wasn't called out in my comments. But of the $10 million or $0.10, probably 10% of that was in LCM adjustment which really is a pull-forward to next quarter. So with prices having stopped going down which we hopefully won't have a LCM in the next quarter.

I guess one last question. I know you don't want to project this too specifically, but the pace of share buybacks rather over the last eight quarters or so has been fairly consistent. Is there any reason to suspect that that wouldn't continue over 2016?

We're optimistic or opportunistic buyers, if you will. We did ramp up our purchases the last couple quarters from the run rate pace and that's really a reflection [Technical Difficulty] stock, the trading multiple on our stock went down almost 2 points. I think the decline in oil prices, the decline in steel prices really had an impact and so we tried to take advantage of that. For us it's always a balancing act between capital investment, acquisitions, our debt level and what we think the value is in investing in our stock. I would say where we're right now, certainly feels like it's a pretty attractive buying opportunity. But in terms of the pace, that's a little bit to be determined.

Next we will go back to the line of John Tumazos. Please go ahead.

In your table that breaks down the cylinder business across the five different end markets, I noticed that the consumer segment is $100 million some smaller than it had been one or two years ago. Was there some reclassification of the end markets out of consumer into the other four? And could you elaborate in your interpretation of your cylinder customer basis?

John, we would have to go back and look at it. We have moved the product classifications around a little bit, to try and mirror them with the way we're managing the business, if you will. So there have been some changes. $100 million sounds like a lot to me. So we'd have to go back and look at that and we're happy to do that, but we probably won't be able to do it on the--

Sure. Let me ask you another question. In the annual report footnote, the debt of WAVE at the end of the prior calendar year was just over $200 million. What is the total debt of all the nonconsolidated subsidiaries?

I want to say it is around $300 million, but we will get that number for you.

Your next question comes from the line of Phil Gibbs from KeyBanc. Please go ahead.

I think you had given some color on the tolling volumes relative to last year. Did you say they were down 18% relative to last year?

Yes, they were flat overall with the exception of the [indiscernible] line which was down a lot. And that took the average down 18%.

Okay. And then do you have that mix as a percentage of the volume?

That makes the overall volume, if you count the lump toll and direct together mix, the total mix down 10%.

Total mix down 10% relative to last year, you are saying?

Yes. Again, the toll miss was totally driven by one facility which is -- I don't think that was a market, that's not a market problem. It's something we're working on.

Okay. It was still around the 60/40 type--

We're talking about the mix. 60/40 direct and yes, that is pretty similar.

[Operator Instructions]. At this time, there are no further questions.

We owe John an answer. If we can do it now, we'll do it. We got that?

[Operator Instructions].

We don't have the exact number, but is going to be around $300 million, John. We can get that for you off-line. It's also published in our 10Q, the number will come out. It hasn't changed dramatically from what it was last quarter. I'm sure of that. You could look at last quarter's Q and get be a good proxy for it. All right. Thank you all for joining us. We look forward to speaking to you in September and have a great Fourth of July holiday.

[Operator Instructions]. That does conclude your conference for today. Thank you for your participation and for using AT&T Executive Teleconference. You may now disconnect.