Good afternoon. And welcome to the Worthington Industries Third Quarter Fiscal 2018 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be able to listen only until the question-and-answer session of the call. This conference is being recorded at the request of the Worthington Industries. If anyone objects, you may disconnect at this time. I’d like to introduce Ms. Cathy Lyttle, Vice President of Corporate Communications and Investor Relations. Ms. Lyttle, you may begin.

Thank you, Sean. Good afternoon. Welcome to our third quarter earnings call. Certain statements we make today are forward-looking within the meaning of the 1995 Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, and could cause actual results to differ from those suggested. We issued our earnings release this morning. Please refer to it in more detail on those factors that could cause actual results to differ materially. We are recording this call and it will be made available later on our Web site. On our call today, President and COO, Mark Russell and Executive Vice President and CFO, Andy Rose. Andy will start things off.

Thanks, Cathy and good afternoon everyone. The Company delivered another solid quarter with earnings per share of $0.61, excluding restructuring and the impact of the new tax law, up $0.04 or 7% from the prior year. We saw improvement in Steel Processing and Pressure Cylinders, and modest declines in Engineered Cabs’ in the joint ventures. Strength in agriculture and heavy truck helped steel, while cylinders benefitted from the colder winter and hurricane relief efforts. Unique items in the third quarter were as follows: inventory holding gains were $800,000 or $0.01 per share as compared to a loss of $3 million or $0.03 per share in the prior year quarter; Pressure Cylinders had one-time charges of $3.6 million during the quarter, primarily in our oil and gas and oil fuels businesses from obsolete inventory and a legal settlement from a prior acquisition. While our tax rate for the quarter was negative, our current expected annual effective tax rate for the year is 10.3%. We had several one-time charges that impacted our tax rate this quarter that totaled $41.2 million or $0.66 per share. $40.6 million was a reduction in our deferred tax liability and $7.3 million was the impact of the lower tax rate on current year-to-date earnings. These two benefits were partially offset by $6.7 million transition tax on foreign earnings. As we mentioned previously, our annual tax rate for fiscal 2019 is expected to be 24%. Cylinders operating income, excluding restructuring, was up $6.4 million or 58% to $17.5 million. Strength in consumer and industrial products was offset by the previously mentioned issues in oil and gas. Revenue and margins continued to improve in oil and gas overall. The integration of Amtrol is largely complete. And while we still continue to focus on extracting synergies, the business contributed $7.3…

Thanks Andy. Our steel processing business had a record third quarter for direct customer shipments, which were up 5% compared to last year. Our strengthened direct shipments outpace the 3% increase in direct shipments reported and meet the Metal Service Center Institute data. Total profits and volume decreased 17%, reflecting continued softness in the total galvanizing business at our Spartan joint venture. Combined, direct and toll volume was down by 6% and the mix of direct and toll was 57% direct versus 43% toll compared to 50% to 48% last year. Direct shipments were particularly strong in both the agriculture segment, which was up 20% and heavy truck, which was up 15%. Automotive shipments to the Detroit Three decreased 2%, while all other automotive shipments increased 4%. TWB steel processing is laser welding and joint venture with [DOW Steel], transition their new Monterrey, Mexico facility to full production, including two state-of-the-art high volume reverie lines and the traditional continues a feed line there. TWB also continues to expand aluminum welded blank production at their flagship facility in Michigan. Serviacero, our Mexican steel processing joint venture, sell direct shipments of 5% while pole shipments were down 20% with overall shipments combined down 3%. Serviacero started production on their new heavy gauge blanker in their expanded Monterrey facility during the quarter. In our Pressure Cylinders oil and gas equipment business, revenue was up 50% compared to last year as market conditions continue to move to a significantly improve in most U.S. oil and gas producing regions. In alternative fuels, revenue was up 21%, primarily due to higher shipments of LPG cylinders to European automotive manufactures. Market conditions continue to improve in this business, particularly in North America where we're seeing the return of spreads between diesel and natural gas efficient to create…

Thank you [Operator Instructions]. Our first question will come from the line of Seth Rosenfeld from Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Just to start out on the JVs. Can you tell us little bit more about the scale of cost pressure you’re feeling at both WAVE and ClarkDietrich product district. And perhaps give us a bit of sense of your ability to pass on those cost structures to customers in either of those two businesses? You guys looked in the response at the first and perhaps recent second price like WAVE and start there please?

So Seth your question is our ability to pass through the recent price increases at WAVE and ClarkDietrich right?

Yes.

So as I mentioned in WAVE, we already announced the price increase in February and we recently announced another one that will be implemented next month. So that WAVE is easily able to keep up with the price increases. And that’s historically been the case for the WAVE business. ClarkDietrich also has announced price increases with the intent of also keeping up with the price. So both of those businesses we have confidence will be able to pass the price increases to their customers.

I guess, have you seen a differential in your ability to successfully execute those price hikes. I guess, obviously you’re able to announce them. But what’s been the response from customers? Do you see different competitive dynamics in those two businesses?

The competitive dynamics are different between WAVE and ClarkDietrich. The metal framing side of the business historically has been much more competitive. There's a number of -- there is many, many more competitors in that market. I will say that, historically, both of those businesses when there are rapidly rising steel prices are very successful at moving price increase. And I think the one thing that I see in this one is obviously there's not too many people on the planet that aren’t aware that the U.S. has implemented these tariffs, because it's been so broadly displayed across the news media. And so I think the acknowledgment amongst their customer base is this is a reality and at the end of the day, I think not only are there customers aware, but also their competitors are aware and they’re viewing it as an opportunity to move the price up.

So if I’d even say in the businesses where we have a hedge price of steel, we still are going to be able to have some price movements because the environment allows it. And as Andy mentioned, everybody knows that the price is going up.

And then going back to the Steel Processing business please. Can you just give us a little bit more color on the current dynamics within the automotive customer segments? Just what you have the different to be in the Detroit Three and non- Detroit Three customers, if you can perhaps talk a little bit more about your expectations for volumes this year? Thank you.

We use the same kind of forecast for forward volume in terms of build rate than most people do. And so you can see that as well as we can. As I mentioned the Detroit Three volume for us is off just slightly, just a couple of points and the non-Detroit Three, which for us is the new domestics typically it’s the largest component of that, were actually up. So overall automotive is pretty steady for us at the moment.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of John Tumazos from Very Independent Research. Please go ahead.

Recently we’ve had near record steel prices. Why do you think your JV earnings, many of whom are steel processing companies with steel inventory have a surge, nor your steel processing earnings as much as in the past. And your shares, which made a record year or two ago when the stock market was lower before the Trump election, haven’t gone up with the market or the higher steel prices where in the past they had. Is your hedging program that good?

So I guess the first part of your question, John, is the run up in steel prices really hasn’t flowed through the income statement of both the steel company and our other businesses that you call processors. You have to remember there's a lag effect of let’s call it a quarter or sometimes two, maybe a quarter and half, because of the way they buy steel and the way they sale steel. So it’s going to happen. There is just a little bit of a lag there. And then your question on the stock price, it is interesting. We actually just recently ran a correlation between us and the mills. And I think it was around 60% maybe that our stock price moved in correlation. Ironically, today, it seems to be moving in lockstep with the mills. So I think we’ve maybe disassociated ourselves a little bit from the mills and view it little bit more like a metals manufacturing company by a number of investors. So that may explain part of it. But it’s an interesting question, hard to explain sometimes.

Do you know how much of your shares are owned by ETFs that might comp you with the mills?

Off the top of my head, I do not. But it’s a pretty high percentage.

Thank you [Operator Instructions]. And we have a question line of Phil Gibbs from KeyBanc Capital. Please go ahead.

Just had a question on the comments you made on some of the inventory. I think there were some losses in the oil and gas business. And maybe you could explain some of that. I don’t think that’s something we wouldn’t suspect.

So there is really two things going on there. There's about 1.2 million of essentially a legal reserve that we took related to the settlement of an escrow around an acquisition we did several years ago. And then the balance of that 3.6 million, which should be 2.4 million, is basically inventory write offs for products that we were carrying that we thought we can sell that we just couldn't. And it's primarily in oil and gas, but there was also one specific product in our alternative fuels business. So think of it as obsolete inventory that was written off during the quarter.

And maybe Mark if you could give some color in terms of what you're seeing in the oil and gas business right now in terms of your returns in maybe the regions and the backlog?

Obviously much stronger across the board as everybody can see from the publicly available information. We are ideally suited to serve customers in the Marcellus and Utica in the east. And obviously, the strength there with -- the strength there not only coming from the increase in price but also the availability of gathering lines now, so there is so much of that acreage that was not drillable and completeable, because it couldn’t be helped up with the pipeline. That's now caught up and so the strength there is increasing. And then of course we are also ideally suited in the west for the Eagle Ford, the Denver-Julesburg and then in the Bakken. And all of those are doing very well at the moment. So it looks like we're seeing strength return to those markets and that's reflected in our forward order book. It's up significantly double digits.

This is the tanks or the separation equipment or both, is there a differentiation between the backlogs there?

It's both, Phil.

And Andy, any color you could provide us on the potential magnitude of FIFO holding gains for Q4 if we assume that Steel Processing out around call it 800 or 850?

I mean, it's definitely going to be double-digit million, so let's call it north of 10 million. But there is still a few months left in the quarter so the actual number is to be determined. But it's going to be meaningful.

And one more from me if I could. So the toll processing volumes down quite a bit in the steel business domestically, and I think you had mentioned that the Serviacero toll processing business is down quite a bit. Is there any correlation or link that you could draw between the two in terms of why the direct might be strong and the tolling isn’t, is there something broadly speaking going on in the sourcing in automotive? Thanks.

Phil, I don’t think that there is a broad change in the market. I think that the differences in tolling that we’re seeing our more specific to facilities for us. As I mentioned, our galvanizing total business is down at Spartan. We believe that that will turn around in future quarters. Our pickling toll business is down, particularly in our Middle Town Ohio facility, down by Cincinnati and that was really to quality issues we were having on that particular pickle line. We've got those sorted out now. But while we were sorting through that, we had to reduce the volume on that line and of course loss some volume there. So we think those two things are temporary and pretty much individually applying to facilities for us.

Thank you. And we have a question line of John Tumazos from Very Independent Research. Please go ahead.

Could you give us a little color on the Engineered Cabs and other segments, the losses there were each a little bigger?

Engineered Cabs, they are going through a period where they've been transitioning business out from a large customer and replacing that business with a number of smaller programs. The good news and the bad news about the cabs business is when they win business, it takes somewhere between 12 and 18 months to bring those new programs online. And so while their end markets are up as we saw with revenue up 15%, it's taking some time to bring those newer programs online. The other thing that's going on in Engineered Cabs is in one of our facilities, we have a pretty significant labor challenge in terms of finding good labor that we can keep around. And so we've had a lot of temporary labor that has significantly higher costs, which we’re working to address right now. So there the cost of producing a cab in that one facility is way up as a result of labor, that’s something we think we can work through and so expect to decline in future quarters. And then your second question was on the other. There's only one business left in other, which is our energy innovations business, it’s a very small business. Typically, what you're seeing there in terms of fluctuations is related to unallocated overhead that we have as a company. So often times we have accounts that we will accrue things at corporate and then in the next quarter, we’ll allocate them out, a good example is some of our healthcare charges. And so those are a little bit hard to predict but I expect that number to be less negative in future quarters.

Thank you. And at this time, I am showing no further questions in queue.

Great. Well, thank you all for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you in June for our fiscal year-end earnings call.

Thank you. And ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude our conference for today. Thanks for your participation and joining our conference.