Good morning and welcome to the Worthington Enterprises Second Quarter Fiscal 2025 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be able to listen-only until the question-and-answer session of the call. This conference is being recorded at the request of Worthington Enterprises. If anyone objects, you may disconnect at this time. I'd now like to introduce Marcus Rogier, Treasurer and Investor Relations Officer. Mr. Rogier, you may begin.

Thank you, Regina. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for Worthington Enterprises’ Second Quarter Fiscal 2025 Earnings Call. On our call today, we have Joe Hayek, Worthington's President and Chief Executive Officer; and Colin Souza, Worthington's Chief Financial Officer. Before we get started, I'd like to note that certain statements made today are forward-looking within the meaning of the 1995 Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. These statements are subject to risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from those suggested. We issued our earnings release yesterday after the market close. Please refer to it for more detail on those factors that could cause actual results to differ materially. In addition, our discussion today will include non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of these measures with the most appropriate comparable GAAP measure is included in the earnings press release, which is available on our Investor Relations website. Today's call is being recorded, and a replay will be made available later on our worthingtonenterprises.com website. This point, I will turn the call over to Joe for opening remarks.

Thank you, Marcus, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Worthington Enterprises fiscal 2025 second quarter earnings call. Our second quarter marks the end of our first full year as Worthington Enterprises. I'd like to start by thanking our entire team for their hard work, building this strong foundation and for embracing our philosophy that prioritizes a people-first, performance-based culture to drive shareholder returns. Financially, we had a solid quarter despite mild but persistent macro headwinds. We grew both adjusted EBITDA and earnings per share year-over-year and sequentially from Q1. While we're pleased with our results in Q2, we continue to set our sights higher. We're taking a fresh look at how we do things across the organization, we're thinking more like a startup and we're pursuing initiatives to optimize our margins as we grow Worthington. One of the things that sets Worthington apart is our ability to understand our customers' businesses and to partner with them to help drive their success, innovate and open and expand new markets. A great example is our partnership with 3M on the PowerCore engineered cylinder. Our team's engineering prowess, collaborative approach, and relentless energy enabled 3M's October launch of a new water-based adhesive using our power core cylinder, which is intended to make commercial adhesive work for construction and repair remodel roofing more efficient and effective. Innovation like this is a key element of the Worthington Business System that anchors our growth strategy. We continue to innovate in consumer products as well and our HALO Versa pizza oven was recently named one of this year's best gifts for the holiday season by Food and Wine magazine. We have a number of new product launches planned in calendar 2025 and we are committed to continuing to bring innovation to our markets and our customers. Inorganic…

Thank you, Joe, and good morning, everyone. In Q2, we reported GAAP earnings from continuing operations of $0.56 per share versus $0.36 in the prior year quarter. There were a few unique items that impacted our quarterly results, including the following. The current quarter was negatively impacted by net pre-tax restructuring charges of $3 million or $0.04 per share, primarily due to charges related to an executive retirement. Results in the prior year quarter were negatively impacted by $0.21 per share due to several items, the largest being corporate costs eliminated at the time of separation and transaction costs associated with separating our steel processing business. These were partially offset by a pre-tax gain within equity income from a divestiture and our CABs joint venture. Excluding these items, we generated adjusted earnings from continuing operations of $0.60 per share in the current quarter compared to $0.57 per share in Q2 of the prior year. The current quarter was also negatively impacted by $2 million or $0.03 per share due to an increase in our bad debt reserves specific to two customers who recently declared bankruptcy. Consolidated net sales in the quarter of $274 million decreased 8.1% from $298 million in the prior year. The decrease was largely driven by the deconsolidation of our former sustainable energy solution segment which contributed $28 million in sales in the prior year quarter. Our gross profit for the quarter increased to $74 million compared to $63 million in the prior year quarter, and gross margin increased approximately 580 basis points to 27% in the current quarter. Adjusted EBITDA in Q2 was $56 million, up slightly from $55 million in Q2 of last year, and up sequentially from $48 million in Q1. Our TTM adjusted EBITDA is now $235 million and TTM adjusted EBITDA margin…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question will come from the line of Kathryn Thompson with Thompson Research Group. Please go ahead.

Hi, thank you for taking my questions today.

Good morning, Kathryn.

Good morning. First, I wanted to get kicked off on your gross margins, which were up a healthy clip in the quarter and definitely higher than most recent quarters. And you've touched on some aspects of it in the prepared commentary, but could you help us understand the larger drivers, even if you have, say half is from some categories or another, but really looking at mix shift from the stock and comps, M&A, or just better environment. Just help rank order what drove the margin performance.

Sure. Thanks, Kathryn. So just a few more details there. You know, the gross margin was up 580 basis points. If you recall, you know, we had a -- recall of a product in the prior year quarter. And then we're also excluding sales and margin from our SES business unit, which we formed a joint venture here in our Q4. And that really led to 300 basis points approximately of margin expansion just with those items. And then we layer on the inclusion of Ragasco, which we acquired in June. And then in addition to that, some positive kind of makeshift in our higher margin products. So we're overall pleased with [where margins] (ph) are this quarter at 27%. And that's about what we would kind of expect our margins to be at this time.

Okay, helpful. And with the addition of Ragasco and just kind of the shift overall structurally this year, how should we think about SG&A, kind of just give a different focus as we look forward?

So, Kathryn, when we think about SG&A, it's really in the context of how we're running the business, right? And so a lot of the things that we've been after strategically are bearing fruit. You look at the way that we've strengthened our value propositions over the last year. We talked about the 3M partnership in the consumer business. We continue to work with our partners and bring point-of-sale data and analytics to them so that they can have adequate levels of inventory as they prepare for winter weather or storms and so that's really helping think about things you did mention this earlier on the kind of [de-stocking] (ph) having run its course. That's more on the large format propane tank. But when we think about SG&A, obviously we inherited the SG&A that comes from Ragasco, but we're really focused on thinking about things and taking a fresh look at things. When we think about kind of optimizing and growing Worthington, we have taken a step back and we're thinking about things a little differently and that's going to allow us to be successful in any demand environment. You know, the one that we're in now, we characterize as kind of flat and steady sequentially, but when some of the markets that we participate in return to growth, that discipline is going to really manifest itself, we think, in some great things.

Okay. Great. Thank you. Just to follow up on WAVE, the WAVE JV, it continues to perform well, double digits for six of the past seven quarters. Obviously, there's more than just office and -- but could you talk about just expand on trends that are driving this performance and how we should think about growth as we face tougher comps going to the next calendar year? Thank you.

Sure. Well, WAVE, as you know, is a terrific business with a great leadership team and it's a great JV that between ourselves and Armstrong that I think both companies are very proud of. And one of the reasons that they can continue to do as well as they're able to -- is their value proposition which really comes back to understanding their customers and being able to create and supply reliably solutions that save their end user contractors time and labor. And so you can buy the WAVE product, which is a portion of the overall spend, but then as you're installing those ceilings in different areas, your labor costs is an even bigger spend. And so, we think about, you're right, commercial and on offices is a little soft. We've seen continued of strength, and this applies to an extent to ClarkDietrich as well, but education, healthcare, data centers, and transportation, specifically the larger airports or train stations or things like that. And so, you know, I think we would expect on a WAVE to -- WAVE and ClarkDietrich to both kind of be around here sequentially for the next couple quarters with on the ClarkDietrich side, you know, a caveat being what happens with steel prices. But based on what we can see, you know, we think steady as she goes for both of the JVs.

Okay, perfect. And then just final question, you know, one thing that we have seen in terms of talking to some of our industry contacts in the field and the construction industrial value chain is that it just transfer kind of lackluster in the spring and into the summer. But [mainly] (ph) over the past one to two months, you've seen a definite [pay cut] (ph) in activity. What are you seeing in terms of your businesses, or are there some areas that are performing better more recently versus others? Thanks so much, and best of luck.

Thank you, Kathryn. Yeah, I think it's probably a little bit of a similar answer to the one that we just walked through. I think that some of the infrastructure-oriented spending and some of the stimulus from, gosh, now a couple, two years, three years ago has started to make its way into projects. The CHIPS Act and some of the money that's being allocated for some of these infrastructure project has helped with some of the larger projects that are out there. Generally speaking, when we get into talking about residential spends and things like that, it'll be a little different. But yeah, I would absolutely agree that there's still some, as we referred to them, it's kind of mild but persistent headwinds, but we are starting to see some green shoots in certain areas.

Great. Thanks so much.

Our next question comes from the line of Daniel Moore with CJS Securities. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, Joe. Good morning, Colin. Appreciate the color.

Good morning, Dan.

Maybe start with building products. Just elaborate and maybe differentiate from what you're seeing. I said building products, but just more generally, I should say, on the heating and cooking space, you know, between I guess the large format on the one side and, you know, kind of smaller consumer on the other. And I know this is, you know, seasonally not the strongest period, but, you know, what are you seeing in terms of maybe bottoming and expectations as we think about calendar 2025?

Yeah, great question. And Colin mentioned it when we talk about heating and cooking. One of the core tenets of our growth strategy is transformation. And we have been focused pretty resolutely on our, I call it the gas grill market, the barbecue market, right, the smaller kind of propane tank market. And we saw in the quarter a return to growth and return to more seasonally normal and growth in the large format heating tanks. You know, in the smaller tanks, we had a handful of things that we needed to get done on that facility modernization project. And in the quarter, that hampered our ability to produce as much as we would have liked to. And as you would imagine in a manufacturing environment, volume matters both because there are sales to be had and there are also conversion costs and things like that. So through that transformational project and as that's completed, we upgraded that facility, put in robotics and automated that facility. And so as we look forward, that project is done. And we feel much better about that business moving forward. Given that one, we finished that project, and two, we've had some market share wins in the interim.

Really helpful. And maybe kind of taking it back up to 30,000 feet, but one of the comments you made was trying to think more like a startup. I'm wondering if you can elaborate on that and then just talk about any meaningful differences or in strategic direction now that you've been at the helm of CEO for a couple of months and both organically and in terms of where you're focused from an M&A perspective.

Sure, so It's a great honor and a privilege to lead this company. And I would say we start with what's not going to change our culture. I get people first performance based culture. It's a huge advantage for us. It's something that we're pretty proud of and we're pretty protective of, but it's also something that we leverage. We have great people. We also have really solid strategies and value propositions. We talked about the example I gave you in building products and then what we talked about in consumer. And so those things are fundamental to who we are and it's something we're very proud of and we're not going to change. With respect to thinking more like a startup, we're a 70 year old company, but we're a one year old company as Worthington Enterprises. And so it gives us the opportunity to look back and to think about what, you know, we want the next five years to look like and what we're trying to do ultimately is optimize and grow the company and as you optimize sometimes you need to reset a little bit and think about things differently. The way that we have historically done things matters a lot, but the way that we do things now and trying ultimately to optimize our business in the current environment is going to prepare us to really be able to focus on growth. And as we look at what's possible for us from a margin perspective, if we are able in the next 12 months to 18 months to really position ourselves the way that we want to, it's going to lead to really good things in any environment, but particularly as growth returns to some of our end markets.

It's helpful, maybe one or two quick ones. Just housekeeping, but the sustainable energy, now JV, was just above breakeven. You expect to remain around those levels. Just wondering if you expect it to be a modest drag or a modest contributor as we think about the next sort of four to eight quarters.

I'd say you're right on it'll probably be flattish.

Got it. And then lastly, from a capital allocation perspective, you know, bought back 200,000 shares, still have, you know, well over [5 million] (ph) remaining on the authorization. The shares still trading relatively depressed valuations. My words, not yours, but wondering what their aggressiveness from a buyback perspective might be going forward. Thanks again for all the color.

Yep, no, it's a great question. Dan, when we think about capital allocation, you know, we still have a bias for growth. If you look at our CapEx in the quarter on, I'll call it our run rate CapEx was closer to $5 million on top of $5 million in Q1. And so you're kind of run rating at a CapEx level of, you know, [$25-ish million] (ph) to $30 million in relative to our sales. When we get through our facility modernization projects, we're going to be able to generate a fair amount of additional free cash flow. And we have, as we've talked about, we have kind of goals for our free cash flow conversion rates that are out there. So when we think about capital allocation, we're still going to have a bias for growth. But when we look at M&A, the M&A market in 2024 was expected to be a big, breaking of the logjam and it turned out that interest rates were stubbornly high and then there was some uncertainty around the election. That's passed us. And so now I think a lot of folks are suggesting that 2025 will be that more active market for M&A. Our M&A criteria, I think, we've talked about companies that make us better, improve our margins and our free cash flows. But if ultimately we look at our stock price or our ability to think about what that looks like from a buyback versus how expensive M&A is or how attainable M&A is, that's always a toggle that we can go back and forth on. I would expect us to at least buy back shares that will offset dilution, but anything above and beyond that, our authorization is still pretty healthy. And we have that lever we can pull if we deem it appropriate.

Our next question will come from the line of Susan Maklari with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone.

Good morning, Susan.

Good morning, Joe, and congrats to you and Colin on both of your new roles there.

Very nice of you to say, thank you.

Yeah, my first question is, can you talk a bit about price cost as we think about the deflation that's come through steel, just where we are in that process of realizing those moves and then how you're thinking about price as we look to the next couple of quarters?

Sure. So, input costs, you know, for us, you know, part of transformation for us is ultimately thinking about how we approach our inputs, right, how we approach manufacturing, how we approach purchasing, and things like that. Relatively speaking, the deflationary environment, I think you're probably mostly talking about steel, we would expect that to be relatively flat year-over-year. We are absolutely doing everything we can to keep our costs down, to decrease what we need to put into getting our products out the door with deficiencies and things like that. But the market for pricing generally is I would say okay. I don't think that it, you know, as it is more of a macro-economic statement that -- nobody wants reignited inflation. You know, we'll see what comes in the next three months with the new administration. But I don't think that we anticipate our prices going up, very, very significantly, because we're working on the back end and our efficiencies and trying to be sensitive to the elasticity that's out there as well. Okay that's helpful color and then maybe thinking about the administration that will come in next year and some of the policies that they could implement, as you think about the global competitive environment that you operate within and the potential for some tariffs or some other trade actions to come through, what could that mean for Worthington? How are you positioning the business relative to that? Any thoughts there strategically on how things could come together?

Well, it's a great question and you know, we don't think anybody actually roots for tariffs, but I think it's that everybody wants a level playing field so that their businesses can compete on their merits in it, we don't speculate on being incoming ministrations goals or their likely actions but I think they're smart people and in our senses that they want that same thing which is that level playing field so in that context you know the Susan the majority of our revenue in the US comes from products that we manufacture domestically. And we do absolutely face price competition from imports. And so we potentially be a net beneficiary of actions that help create and sustain that level playing field and support U.S. Manufacturing. We have spent a lot of time on this and will continue preparing for various scenarios around trade policy, so that we can more effectively anticipate and adjust to dynamics as they present themselves but bottom-line, I think which is your question is that we think, we were pretty well positioned in any scenario. And we also think that the -- and we're pretty confident that the incoming administration is really focused on what we think would be the best case scenario, which is creating that level playing field while not igniting new inflationary pressures, which wouldn't be good for anybody.

Yeah. Okay. I appreciate all the color. Thank you. Good luck with everything.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our next question comes from the line of Brian McNamara with Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.

Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking our questions.

Absolutely, Brian, good morning.

Congrats to Joe and Colin on the promotions. I'm curious, was this the plan all along in terms of succession, and does anything change in terms of your longer-term financial targets, particularly the 6% to 8% kind of top-line growth target?

Yeah, well, you're nice to say that, Brian. The plan ultimately is typically the plan right before a plan happens. And so timing-wise, we're very blessed and appreciative and grateful for the work that Andy did and our entire teams continue to do. But to your other question, as we look forward, you know, those targets, I would say that based on the way that we're trying to drive the business and we're trying to optimize the business, our goal ultimately is to kind of, maintain or grow our gross margins and over time work down our SG&A, as a percentage of sales. That's going to create margin expansion for us. Again, this isn't happening tomorrow, but as we look out into the next kind of 12 months to 18 months, 24 months, we think that's something that we're going to be pretty committed to doing. And really the only place where maybe we need a little help on those goals that we have out there is just the markets themselves. You note that we're relatively flat year-over-year and that's a function of markets that are flat, steady. I think actually I've heard this I think maybe Susan mentioned this on one of her notes but repair model markets is steady but slow and so our growth in in those environment is more around our value propositions and our ability to take share. It's certainly around de-stocking having run its course. But ultimately, it'll be much easier to get to those targets, and it won't be necessarily linear. So if you think about five years, if you're flat for a couple, there's likely to be a catch up at some point. And so that six day clearly isn't where we're at right now. But as we've talked, Brian, some of that's from M&A, and some of that's organic. And the markets as they get on stuck, will help us really drive that top-line organically and we're certainly focused on making good strategic M&A decisions which hopefully kind of gets us the rest. But that's really the one thing I would say right now is as you look at it, we're probably not where we'd like to be, mostly because of the markets that we're in.

Great. Appreciate the color on that. Secondly, on gross margin, I just want to confirm, I think Colin said 27% is where you expect to be moving forward. Is that, did I hear that right?

Yeah, I don't, yeah -- without sort of giving guidance, quote unquote, we were at 27% and you know as we look forward the dynamics that he mentioned that were the year-over-year comp will be in place as we go forward.

And then just one final one, M&A, particularly in consumer, you know, you're in three pretty different end markets with tools, outdoor living, celebrations. Where are the M&A opportunities as you see them today and kind of where in consumer do you want a bigger presence and order priority? Thank you.

Sure, it's a great question. Our consumer business is doing exceptionally well and their value proposition is so sophisticated. And so when we think about consumer, we think about adding companies to our umbrella, it's really one companies that we can make better. And so that is utilizing our relationships with either our retail partners or distribution partners if it's going into the more the professional channel. You know, this, Brian, a lot of our customers in the consumer space are do-it-yourselfers or their contractors that happen to shop in various places. And so we want to be where they are. But again, it's, I would say, it's more going to be focused on the value added tool space and in those markets as opposed to some of the others that we're in today.

And that will conclude our question-and-answer session. And I'll hand the call back over to Joe Hayek for any closing remarks.

Thank you, Regina. And thank you, everyone, for joining us this morning. Please have a safe and a very happy holiday season. We'll look forward to speaking to everybody again soon.

That does conclude our call today. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.