Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the Westport Fuel Systems First Quarter 2018 Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to turn the conference over to Ms. Caroline Sawamoto, Manager of Investor Relations and Communications for Westport Fuel Systems. Please go ahead.

Thank you, and good morning. Welcome to Westport Fuel Systems First Quarter 2018 Conference Call, which is being held to coincide with the press release containing Westport Fuel Systems financial results that went out last night. On today's call, speaking on behalf of Westport Fuel Systems is Chief Executive Officer, Nancy Gougarty; and Chief Financial Officer, Ashoka Achuthan. Attendance at this call is open to the public and to media, but questions will be restricted to the investment community. You are reminded that certain statements made in this conference call and our responses to various questions may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of U.S. and applicable Canadian securities law, and such forward-looking statements are made based on our current expectations and involve certain risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements, so you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these statements. Information contained in this conference call is subject to and qualified in its entirety by information contained in the company's public filings. I'll now turn the call over to Nancy.

Perfect. Thank you, Caroline. Good morning, and thank you for joining us at Westport Fuel Systems First Quarter Results Conference Call. We continue to see a rapid transition in the transportation industry towards environmentally friendly fuels and technologies. Traditional fuels are decreasing in the market, especially diesel. In the first quarter of 2018, the European Union diesel car registration fell 17% compared to the same period last year, while the market for natural gas, propane and ethanol had a 12% increase year-over-year. This only means that there is a tremendous opportunity in front of us. Consumers demand clean vehicles and there is a greater urgency for market-ready solutions. We still need to stay focused on deploying alternative fuel solutions for transportation vehicles. One way is to continue to review our portfolio and look to divest noncore businesses However, today, I'm going to focus on our core business. If you would please turn to Slide 2. Westport Fuel Systems has a complete product offering that addresses a broad range of alternative fuels including [indiscernible], propane, natural gas and nitrogen. We have LPG and [indiscernible] kits for the aftermarket conversion and we have 25% of the global market share. Our kits include a complete range of products including our most advanced systems for direct injection engines. For the aftermarket business, Westport Fuel Systems continues to invest in targeted R&D to stay paced with new technologies introduced by transportation OEMs and their engineering evolutions. We have zero-kilometer conversions for delayed OEM solutions for LPG and CNG conversions. This is a great solution for our OEM partners to provide alternative fuel vehicle in their showroom. In some countries like Italy, Turkey and Sweden, Westport Fuel Systems has a dominant market share. If we look at the OEM Light-Duty solutions, LPG and CNG components and…

Thank you, Nancy. I'll begin with Slide 3, which provides a summary of our first quarter 2018 performance. On a consolidated basis, we ended the quarter with $67.6 million in revenues and an adjusted EBITDA loss of $3.5 million. Our gross margin for the quarter was impacted by costs related to the HPDI 2.0 product and significantly lower engineering service revenues compared to what we had both in the first and the fourth quarters of 2017. As expected, our operating expenses continue to decline, primarily on account of lower R&D expenses for the HPDI 2.0 program. We are well on track to achieve positive consolidated adjusted EBITDA during the second quarter of 2018 as stated in our last earnings call. Please note that we have now realigned our reporting segments into Transportation, CWI and Corporate. Turning to Slide 4, which shows our Transportation segment. Revenues for the quarter improved by $7.6 million compared to the same period last year. This was on account of the relative strength of the euro versus the U.S. dollar, sales of our HPDI 2.0 product and stronger European independent aftermarket and DOEM or delayed OEM demand offset by lower engineering service revenues. As stated earlier, gross margins were impacted by costs related to our HPDI 2.0 product and lower engineering service revenues this quarter. As expected, however, we have a significant drop in our R&D expenses as much as 25% over the first quarter of 2017 and 24% sequentially. Our SG&A cost trended lower as well. Our adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was a loss of $0.6 million, a significant improvement over a loss of $2.4 million in the first quarter of 2017 and a loss of $4 million in the fourth quarter of 2017. Turning to Slide 5, which shows the results of CWI,…

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from Eric Stine of Craig-Hallum Capital Group.

So let me start with just a two-part question on HPDI, now that you've launched, you've got trucks on the road in Europe. Just curious how the OEM pipeline has come together or has changed as a result of that. And then when you look at what those OEMs are looking for, I mean, any clarity you can give on whether those are skewed more towards a similar engine to what is now in the market? Or are they looking for more of a unique solution and just what that would mean in terms of time-to-market or development?

Well, let me try to answer the first part first and that in terms of the reception of the product in Europe, I think that it has been quite good. We're very pleased. As you know, as anytime you're launching a new product with new technologies, we've got to make sure that the entire system is ready and up and running. And so I think that all of those attributes are getting a slice and you're starting to see country-by-country more and more vehicles on the road and that will continue throughout the calendar year '18. In terms of - the second part of the question, Eric, in terms of what people are looking for. I would say they're different customers that have different approaches to the market. Some people are very comfortable with me-too products, which means that there would be minor innovations and quick-to-market solutions. And in some cases maybe even I'll say some delayed OEMs modifications and others are looking for differentiating products and technologies. Obviously, those would take us longer to get to market.

Got it. I mean, is it fair to say that now that it's 2.0, part of that is with the goal that you can get to market quicker. If it is more of that, as you put the me-too version, it's a 18 to 24 months, time frame?

Absolutely. Yes.

Okay, good. Maybe just turning away from HPDI a little bit. I mean, I know that gets a great deal of focus as it should but just curious about the - your high-efficiency spark programs there as well. Just curious, where that stands. How would you characterize the interest levels? And is that something where you potentially - and I know you're not in charge of this, it's the OEM but there's potentially some news flow on that front in 2018?

Well, I would say that again, we're part of being whether regardless of whether it's in the trucking side or the [indiscernible] its market-ready solutions or things that can go fast to market. I think that a lot of OEMs are finding that they don't have a full portfolio and for markets whether it's cars or trucks. And the perfect line of products does great in the medium duty space and I think that that's where we're going to see most interest but what I would say this what we're finding now is the fact that we can move to market so rapidly. As I mentioned in my speech and as Ashoka mentioned in his speech, also the upswing that we've seen in the late OEM or 0-kilometer conversions that we see, we feel that, that's a great way for the OEMs really could speak quickly to their product portfolio and I think that with the enhanced market [indiscernible], that's going to be one of those products that can come to market in a more rapid fashion.

Yes. Yes. Okay. That's great. Maybe just last one for Ashoka, just in terms of CWI, I know you had the warranty adjustment there which impacted margins. Is that something that we should kind of view onetime in nature? Or is that something that you'll have that for a little bit now that you've launched the 12-liter Near Zero?

Yes. Eric, I don't want to make too big a deal about that warranty adjustment. Bear in mind, we had significantly lower revenues this quarter than we had in the fourth quarter of 2017 or for that matter any quarter last year. So there was an impact there as well. But yes, we did have a warranty adjustment. No reason to believe that that's going to be an ongoing issue and that did impact our margins slightly. But net-net, as I mentioned, if it weren't for those adjustments, our quarter gross margins for our current quarter would have actually been higher than the corresponding gross margin in a prior period quarter.

Our next question comes from Rob Brown of Lake Street Capital Markets.

Sticking to your CWI for a second, maybe, could you give us some color on the cadence of the unit shipments as the year goes on after the kind of pull-forward last quarter? How does that recover throughout the year?

No. I think we are beginning to see recovery already, Rob. And the pull-forward last year was essentially on two grounds: One, the fact that we had fleet owners who wanted to prebuy before the OBD compliance requirements kicked in and also because there is a fair amount of vehicle integration work that needs to be done once you have these OBD-compliant engines installed in your truck. So there was some, shall we say that's what I meant when I said vehicle readiness issues in the first quarter. That is largely behind us and what we're seeing now is very strong recovery or a pickup in volumes. So we are reasonably confident that we're looking towards a strong year in 2018 at CWI.

Okay. and then what's your view on the demand growth that can come from the new lease program that Clean Energy discussed yesterday?

Absolutely. Of course, we're not counting on too much on that front this year because we would expect that it would be third quarter or early fourth quarter by the time the mechanics of the lease program are in place, but we are extremely encouraged by the developments at Clean Energy. The investments by Total and more importantly, the financing, the $100 million financing program that they plan to put in place. So we expect to see that - the effect of that more in real late 2018 and 2019, but - and beyond. But irrespective of that, with the extremely strong product offerings that the company has, Near Zero options on 6.7, 8.9, 12 liter and all OBD-compliant, we would've seen a significant uptick in - we would expect to see a significant uptick in volume growth anyway.

Okay. Good. And then on your automotive business, you mentioned some good growth in the European market, but how was your sort of core automotive business growth? Was it sort of similar to the market? Just some comments on how the automotive growth of your business is doing.

We are seeing strong growth in particularly in the independent aftermarket and the DOEM or the zero-kilometers conversion parts, very strong in Europe, matter of fact. We've said in the past that we expect to see low to mid-single-digit growth in this business. We have clearly out done that and our presence in the market is clearly playing its part in helping us grow there.

Let me just answer that. I think what we're seeing as an independent aftermarket is just as Ashoka said, but what I think that the other news is - Rob, is that we're starting to see content increase for some of our OEM customers as well. And we think that the combination of that is getting more content for vehicle as well as the [indiscernible] for them to have a portfolio that is more broad than just petrol and diesel is also helping us on the OEM side as well.

Our next question comes from Jeff Osborn of Cowen and Company.

A couple of questions on my end. Ashoka, the parts revenue on CWI was pretty high. Was that - is this a new run rate? Or was there some onetime items that's related with the OBD compliance issue?

I wouldn't say there was any onetime items. I mean, bear in mind the engine population increases as we sell more engines into the market and as they come out of warranty, it is extremely favorable. So we expect to see continued growth in the parts revenue in this business.

Got it. And then shifting gears to the 2.0 program, is there any sense of perspective you can offer in terms of, which market your partners having the most success in? Where the bulk of the infrastructure has come online and people can move forward with?

You want to take that, Nancy?

Let me see if I can get it started. I think at this point in time, it's still early days and where I think that we are starting to see some good kickups for sure in the U.K. and what I would say in areas where they have LNG as a really known fuel commodity. We're also seeing it in countries where there is relatively high incentives, which are Italy as well as in the Nordic countries.

Got it. And then the last question I had is just the feedback from the ACT show is there's certainly a lot of pent-up interest in the 12-liter Near Zero. But it sounds like some of the OEMs haven't qualified the engine. Can you just give us a sense of where we're at in terms of partners of Cummins that qualified that? And how we should think about the revenue ramp? For that I think Eric had asked about that before but safe to assume it's more of a back-end loaded year?

No, I wouldn't necessarily call it a back-end loaded year, Jeff. I think it will be - we are seeing a pickup already, as I mentioned. So we will see more or less, shall we say linear growth is not unreasonable to expect.

[Operator Instructions]. Our next question comes from Colin Rusch of Oppenheimer.

Obviously, you're approaching this EBITDA breakeven very quickly. Can you talk a little bit about what's going to change in the financial statements to get you there? Is there an incremental margin increase here? Are you just looking at a bit of revenue growth? Or are there some meaningful savings all the above, but if you just get into the granular details on that, that would be great.

Absolutely, Colin. I mean, simplistically, I could say all of the above but frankly it is a three-pronged approach. I mean, as you have noticed, our automotive - former automotive segment continues to perform strongly particularly on the IEM and the DOEM side, we're seeing strong growth there on the top line, stable to positive growth in the margins as well as a result of all the integration and productivity measures we've put in place since the merger in 2016. So that is clearly a strong contributor. The second contributor is CWI. Make no mistake, CWI is a very significant contributor to our bottom line, and you can see in our results that the strength of CWI was a long way in helping us get to where we expect to get to in the second quarter. The third prong, of course, is the reduction in R&D expenses. We have said in the past that with the launch of HPDI 2.0, we expect the R&D program in, what we then called, the corporate and technology segment to come down by 50%. We are beginning to see that as well. So the net result of these three, as we expected, is getting us to where we think we need to be, which is starting off with consolidated adjusted EBITDA positive in the next quarter.

Great. And then just in Europe, as you see the new trucks rollout, could you talk about what you're seeing in terms of preparedness and the service infrastructure? The kind of breadth and density of the service infrastructure, just from a country-by-country basis? How wide is it? Are we going to need to see some real investment in that to really see adoption on the trucks?

You want to take that, Nancy?

Yes. I'll try to take that. And so I would tell you that at this point in time that their launch has taken a significant, I would say, effort and had [indiscernible] for a lot of people their organization instead of doing train the trainer and then moving it to each of the service networks independently, they have decided to do it by bringing in multiple people from different locations. So we are - arguably said that strategy will help get out the trade technicians in a much faster way, and we'll be able to embed the technology and the capability as more trucks move actually out into, I'll say, truck fleets' hands.

This concludes the question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Caroline Sawamoto for any closing remarks.

Thank you, everyone, for joining us today. If you have any follow-up questions, feel free to reach out to the Westport Fuel Systems Investor Relations team. Thanks again, and have a great day.

This concludes today's conference call. You may disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating, and have a pleasant day.